After reading the comments i understand how many dogs are barking to my neighbour house 🏠 The end time is near so prepare yourself my neighbour and don't listen the dogs barking. ~ Demonplays
@@TanveerKhan_19 I used to think the same. The 7 Ahruf of the Qur'an: All have same ayāt. The 10 ways to read the Qur'an: All have same ayāt but many are recited differently since the time of the Prophet, ṣall Allāhu 'alayhi wa ālihiy wa sallm, without changing the meanings of the ayāt of the Qur'ān. They:
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
@@lamlabib487Madrasa chaap don't comment anything if you don't know about it Rukmini was an incarnation of Lakshmi and she was already married to hari the difference is just that they took birth as humans it does not affect fact they are Married already Second All Maulana took false translation of that verse I checked it myself and besides there was no mother of Saraswati and well if you take the same case that god created all humans and if every one is our brothers and sisters so this statement is baseless Third Same as the first and more thing is that in our ancient times when kids both male and female were ready for education it was considered a rebirth so that is where this age number comes from but ofcourse this pea sized brain cannot think or research on its own Instead of cross questioning us tell me about that pdf file momo give me clarification on this topic
Jai shree ram Jai shree Ram Jai shree Ram Jai shree Ram Jai shree Ram Jai shree Ram Jai shree Ram Jai shree Ram ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤❤ ❤❤❤❤❤
suddhi Karan to Tum karte ho 😂😂 aur Bakra eid me bohut se ghareeb logo ko faida hota kisaano ko in logo ko jinke Ghar gosht ata aur Tum hum musalmano ko bura bhala kehte ho jab ke McDonalds wale Roz lakho janwar mar kar ameero ko khilate hn tab tumhara sanatan dharam Kahan jata ha
Bhai maine bhi bhagwat word search kiya aur mujhe bhagwat word indian origin sanskrit word mila jiska matlab hai 'devoted to god' Lagata hai tera Google kisi moulana ne banaya hai😂😂(once a illiterate be always illiterate)
Google khud confuse ha kabhi bhagavat ka matlab bhagwan batata ha kabhi blessed one aur kehta ha yeh buddism me bhi istamal kiya jata ha toh Uski baat sahi ha kuch kehte ha hinduism buddism se copy ha kyunki valmiki Ramayana 109 sarga 34th verse me buddh ko theif kaha gaya ha khud jaake search karle
Har har mahadev Har har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadev
tumhe pata bhi ni k Mola Ali ke Walid ka Naam kia tha aur woh kon Zara parhna unke bare me tumhari seti peti Gul hojai gi Aur Humare Mola Ali AS tu real the history bhi manti ha par tumhare bajrangbali tu real bhi ni the fictional character ko real Hero se compare karo ge 😂
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
Quran Tere Ghar ke pas wale Ghar me ha tu real bajrangbali real ni TU Mola Ali ka Walid Hazrat Abutalib hn aur Muhammad saw sab se influential Man hn history k khud google khool lee
@@SamiAhmed-vo2vi Akhī! Allāh forbade us, in the Qur'ān, and commanded us to not utter things like these. Delete your comment, for Whose Sake you wrote this? Answer: The Divine. Now delete this, on their vision is a cover, and seal is over their eyes and hearts.
So called knowledge 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 i think didn't read Quran right if you have then you have would know about a prophet named Noah who existed 9500 years ago before your dhaarmaa came 😂😂😂😂😂
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
Altamas shaikh I would like to ask you a question that if I had to choose between true friends and a future, who would I choose? Please help me i am confused😢😢😢❤
I would like to say future its more about your parents who invest a lot on you bro .i know true friends are good but thing about it bro you can come back to your true friends make your last photos with them and say them good bye. Future bro in world anyone can make joke of you.❤
Go and check the meaning of 'Ali: Exalted. Oh, you accept that your that god is not exalted. And why are you taking my mawlā 'Ali here? All those narrations that say he tore down a very heavy door are weak/ḍa'īf/unreliable, and only Shi'as and some of the Sufis believe in them.
Go and check the meaning of 'Ali: Exalted. Oh, you accept that your that god is not exalted. And why are you taking my mawlā 'Ali here? All those narrations that say he tore down a very heavy door are weak/ḍa'īf/unreliable, and only Shi'as and some of the Sufis believe in them.
Ye toh aesa he hai ki mene ek light novel likh di , god's devi dev asur ke barey mei aur 1,000 baad kisi ko ye mili aur usne in sabh chizo ko real maan liya... Jese anime ke characters ke log poster , sticker, action figures , fan made lore bnate hai wese he koi ne likh diya aur baad mei logo ne isko divine smjh liya
Marvel ka" avengers infinity war, end game" in sab ka script itna badiya hai, to bad me koi issko bhi "holy scripture" man lega. Avengers ke tarah wo sab bhi ek script hai, lekin logone uske sath itna emotional connection buildup kar liya ki bhulna nehi chahate hai
Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai. 👇👇👇 Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain. jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain. Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai. Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha. Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai. Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai. Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain. Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte hai Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission hota tha. Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai. Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi. Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
@@adityakumarsharma5766lot of words for saying Geeta and Mahabharata have been corrupted (lighter word will be changed) And no even if someone is not comparing it to the Qur'an the fact remain still it have been changed overtime hence cannot be divine (perfect from God) Same can be said about Vedas as it has contradictions too Don't take it as if I'm attacking your religion you're free to believe what you want to believe But even Christian scholars agree that The Bible has been changed many times and it has over 40 authors and all are anonymous, in your last statment you've said that the changes are minor which is definitely not the case , but even if I consider them minor changes for the sake of argument it doesn't add up that following such unreliable book would decide my fate on whether I'll enter heaven or hell when the book itself is unsure of the things it has said.. Logically no one in their right mind would risk betting their eternal destiny determined by such variables
@@user_7727Xkdt You have said many wrong things. Firstly, the claim of knowing the "changes" in the Geeta and the Mahabharata is without proof and to say that they cannot be divine is wrong. Secondly, the claim of there being contradictions in the Vedas is also without any proof. Teesra, mentioning the 40 authors of the Bible and their anonymity does not eliminate their religious validity. Now to say that even minor changes make the message unreliable is also wrong because the original message is intact. The correct answer to this text is: "Geeta, Mahabharata, and Vedas are considered divine scriptures whose messages and teachings are mostly in their original form. Despite their having different versions, their basic essence and divine wisdom are still prevalent. . The opposing claims are mostly wrong or without unnecessary proof. Every religious text has its own distinct aspects and interpretations which do not undermine its divine nature."
@@adityakumarsharma5766 *"Firstly, the claim of knowing the "changes" in the Geeta and the Mahabharata is without proof"* →the video on which you're commenting has already proved debunked that *"to say that they cannot be divine is wrong"* → again bec it is not preserved and had human fabrications justifies that it is not 'divine' hence cannot be from God Frankly if you have your own made up definition of divine I can't help your case *"Secondly, the claim of there being contradictions in the Vedas is also without any proof."* → if your main books are not preserved don't you think that would be the case for Vedas too , as they are much older I know this statment doesn't prove anything but think for a second if it really was preserved why wouldn't it be the main source of guidance in hinduism reason being bec it has very little to do with hinduism And I'm not turning back from my claim that Vedas are contradictory and factually incorrect I'll post some of them in a seperate comment as well. *". Teesra, mentioning the 40 authors of the Bible and their anonymity does not eliminate their religious validity"* →actually its 40+ and they were not all present at the time of Jesus many fabrications were hundreds of years after Jesus most famous example is of Paul who had never met with Jesus himself but still added a lot if misleading stuff in the bible I know this discussion is not about the authenticity of bible I listed the example to show the contrast b/w divinity and human fabrications and how both words can't be present in the same sentence but it seems my point have gone over your head so I'll indulge in this a little bit more *"Anonymity doesn't not eliminate religious validity "* →My guy are you sure that doesn't sound stupid enough already, if I consider it valid then Tom , Harry can add whatever stuff they want in the bible and claim it is from God , doesn't that eliminate the religious validity of the text as it has something which wasn't meant to be... Or are you still going to believe in it blindly?? There are many religions out there some small some large all claim to be true , do you agree with whatever they say or you'll first verify if the information they are passing to you isn't made up by some random guy.. and have strong proof for their reasoning rather than believing everything on the basis of your emotions *"Now to say that even minor changes make the message unreliable is also wrong because the original message is intact."* → 'minor changes' says who you're just downplaying the outright errors that the book has to make your argument sound somewhat reliable but it doesn't really change anything if you use words like 'minor/small' facts remains still that it has been corrupted hence not a reliable source to depend upon... If it has several changes that were recorded who knows how many errors were left unchecked , how many additions and deletions were made and you still to bet everything on that by entertaining your bu saying its minor doesn't really impact the broader message like its some sort of game maybe to you but most ppl won't really trust such source of knowledge which can't even guarantee its preservation *"The correct answer to this text is: "Geeta, Mahabharata, and Vedas are considered divine scriptures whose messages and teachings are mostly in their original form."* → no the correct answer would be , "Geeta , Mahabharata , and Vedas are ~considered~ NOT divine scriptures whose messages and teachings are mostly altered with and we are unable to differentiate the additions as either truth or falsehood" *"Despite their having different versions, their basic essence and divine wisdom are still prevalent."* →again using the divine word wrongly as usual if it has differences it cannot be divine as the definition of divine isn't subjective its an objective word meaning something which is 100% perfect and from God About the wisdom which I won't call divine can be found in literally every life improvement books even from fictional books so it isn't really a measure to decipher whether its from God or not as even our elders and AI can drop some inspirational quotes from time to time doesn't mean they are God or divine either. "*The opposing claims are mostly wrong or without unnecessary proof"* →tell me which one , if they are ones in the video just post a comment on that the author of the video will look into it and correct it if there's any mistake if you're talking about my comment I believe I've said that I'll post them in an seperate comment later *"Every religious text has its own distinct aspects and interpretations which do not undermine its divine nature"* →I've gone through this already several times something being divine isn't decided by our whim and emotions and yes its own aspects and interpretations Maybe don't undermine its divine nature according to your own made up definition of that word , but surely it doesn't prove its sincerity either
Abbe ye to wahi baat hogai abbe bhai God doesn't have any gender you have made it go and read Veda first bro means pig has gender so he is your God . God can never have son and daughter your God never existed 😂😂😂😂😂
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
Video delete kar, Muhammad Pdf file, Ali ka baap Bajrangbali *Sabhi Apne Apne comment aur hamare naye comment par like karo* taki hamara comment *top* per a jaaye 🤝
😒😒😒It's really pathetic to see someone spewing such ignorant and disrespectful garbage. Show some respect for other people's beliefs instead of acting like a mindless fool.
If anybody like hindus have problems with this video Then they should study and learn more about QURAN AND ITS MIRICLES Log asay hi musalman nahi ho jatay Wo is lia hotay hain k islam k pas answers hain logic ha U guys shold really learn about it with nutral mind and u will understand the truth All the aligations that hindus put foreard are false and they should research properly before accusing islam quran and prophet
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
@@Ali_edizZ009 Bro I felt very bad when allah says that non muslims are impure Quran 2:28 Fight with non Muslims Quran 2:29...so friends as a exmuslim report Allah as demon who spread such discrimination
Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai. 👇👇👇 Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain. jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain. Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai. Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha. Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai. Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai. Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain. Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte hai Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission hota tha. Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai. Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi. Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
@@connordread6313 There is no talk about God in the video. An attempt is being made to prove one religion to be good and the other religion to be wrong. And I have proved that 80% of the things said in this video are wrong.
@@connordread6313 People do not accept certain hadiths in modern times because they believe they contradict the Quran or the general principles of Islam. These hadiths include: A woman inherits half of the man's share. A woman must not leave the house without the man's permission. Practicing magic is haram. Looking at a dog with hatred is haram. Men should get more inheritance than women: The Quran says that men should get twice as much inheritance as women.
Le Muttt diya tere pure manipulation pe 🗿 👉 Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai. Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain. jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain. Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai. Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha. Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai. Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai. Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain. Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte दो Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission hota tha. Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai. Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi. Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
@@unknownguy7914tere pass bohot haina pdf file ki aulad har jagah bakwas bakwas karke reply dera hai hume pata hai bohot bakwas karta h tu batane ki zarurat nhi 😔👌🏻
Why do you need Bhagwat Geeta to explain your Quran? We never use Quran to study Bhagwat Geeta. Besides, it takes life times to understand and realise Bhagwat Geeta, so, no point in learning about Bhagwat Geeta or about its history from an Islamic channel that btw doesn’t even put the archeological facts right. Forget about philosophy. A desperate attempt to prove ex Muslims wrong by presenting wrong facts about Hindu scriptures. God know how our scriptures being wrong or let’s say being eaten by bakra or Gomata makes all the wrong in your scriptures right.🤷🏻♂️
Pheli baat ham tumhari trah apni kitab ko akela nahi chorte. ham apni kitab ko parte ha samajte ha aur yaad karte ha. Aur bakre se khaane se koi fark nahi parta kyunki wo toh yaad ha
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
Le Muttt diya tere pure manipulation pe 🗿 👉 Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai. Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain. jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain. Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai. Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha. Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai. Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai. Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain. Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte दो Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission hota tha. Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai. Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi. Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
1-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 2-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 3-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 4-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 5-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 6-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 7-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 8-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 9-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 10-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 11-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 12-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 13-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 14-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 15-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 16-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 17-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 18-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 19-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 20-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 21-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 22-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 23-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 24-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 25-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 26-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 27-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 28-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 29-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 30-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 31-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 32-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 33-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 34-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 35-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 36-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 37-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 38-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 39-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 40-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 41-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 42-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 43-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 44-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 45-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 46-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 47-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 48-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 49-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 50-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 51-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 52-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 53-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 54-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 55-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 56-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 57-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 58-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 59-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 60-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 61-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 62-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 63-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 64-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 65-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 66-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 67-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 68-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 69-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 70-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 71-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 72-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 73-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 74-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 75-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 76-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 77-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 78-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 79-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 80-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 81-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 82-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 83-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 84-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 85-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 86-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 87-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 88-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 89-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 90-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 91-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 92-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 93-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 94-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 95-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 96-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 97-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 98-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 99-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 100-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 101-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 102-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 103-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 104-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 105-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 106-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 107-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️ 108-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
Tughe pata hai jis hazrat Ali ko to Gali de Raha hai Teri Apne hindu group dhut brahmini Hussain hazrat Ali k both respect karte hai 😂 or hum there us 🐒 monkey Baja Bali ki respect nahi karte 😂 video poori dekh pata chal chaega k geta changed hogai😂
After reading the comments i understand how many dogs are barking to my neighbour house 🏠
The end time is near so prepare yourself my neighbour and don't listen the dogs barking.
~ Demonplays
As-salām u 'alaykum wa rahmat Allāh wa barakātuHu ya akhi-l-karīm.
Kaifa hāluk ya akhi?
Abe 🤣 katuve 745 verses vali aur 700 vali dono Bhagwat Geeta hai jo marzi padho ❤
I thought they only have variety in gods.
😂@@TanveerKhan_19
@@TanveerKhan_19 nope... there are a lot of scriptures here
@@TanveerKhan_19 I used to think the same.
The 7 Ahruf of the Qur'an: All have same ayāt.
The 10 ways to read the Qur'an: All have same ayāt but many are recited differently since the time of the Prophet, ṣall Allāhu 'alayhi wa ālihiy wa sallm, without changing the meanings of the ayāt of the Qur'ān.
They:
Hindus be like :- Ye to sala dhoti khol raha hn😂
But accept it truth is bitter❤
ganata
juta sala
😂 It not truth if name is hindu then why I believe this creator name identify religion brother he spread false information
Jai Shree Ram 🚩🚩
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Jay Shree Ram ❤🎉
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@unknownguy7914 puch Kya Puchna Hai Poppat Muhhamad 😁🤣🤣
@@Sanatanibalak-f3w gay shree pam
@@Rashid-hx7gy Chhumad 🤡
@@Sanatanibalak-f3w chutiya ram
Pdf file momo😢 justice for ayesha
Justice for rukmini
Justice for shraswati
Justice for sita
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
@@lamlabib487Madrasa chaap don't comment anything if you don't know about it
Rukmini was an incarnation of Lakshmi and she was already married to hari the difference is just that they took birth as humans it does not affect fact they are Married already
Second
All Maulana took false translation of that verse I checked it myself and besides there was no mother of Saraswati and well if you take the same case that god created all humans and if every one is our brothers and sisters so this statement is baseless
Third
Same as the first and more thing is that in our ancient times when kids both male and female were ready for education it was considered a rebirth so that is where this age number comes from but ofcourse this pea sized brain cannot think or research on its own
Instead of cross questioning us tell me about that pdf file momo give me clarification on this topic
@@lamlabib487sita was 19 while aisha was 9🤡
Saraswati was his own creation more like a partner but Zianab was momo's adopted son's wife💀
JUSTICE FOR AYESHA AND HER CO WIVES
We want face reveal
Usne Kab Ka Kar Diya #Ram Madar C#od Niyog Ka Aulad
At first I wanna see mommy sit@'s face 😋😋😋
😂😂😂😂
Shiv lund ka face revel ?
Ram ka 5 bap 😂
Sanatan Sarvopari
श्री ऋग्वेदीय पूर्वाम्नाय गोवर्धनमठ पुरीपीठ के वर्तमान १४५ वें श्रीमज्जगद्गुरू शंकराचार्य स्वामी श्रीनिश्चलानन्दसरस्वतीजी महाराज की जय 🙏🙏❤❤🚩🚩
🗿
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Bhagwat Geeta ❤🎉
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@unknownguy7914 har jagah yahi comment Agar koi Allah hu akbar bologga toh yahi bolta
Jai shree ram
Jai shree Ram
Jai shree Ram
Jai shree Ram
Jai shree Ram
Jai shree Ram
Jai shree Ram
Jai shree Ram
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤
❤
❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤
❤
❤
❤
❤
❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤
Bak rid mnanae wale geeta ko expose krenge.. pehele suddhi karan karlo apna. Phir apne zaban se bhagwat shabd bolna m u r k h..
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
suddhi Karan to Tum karte ho 😂😂 aur Bakra eid me bohut se ghareeb logo ko faida hota kisaano ko in logo ko jinke Ghar gosht ata aur Tum hum musalmano ko bura bhala kehte ho jab ke McDonalds wale Roz lakho janwar mar kar ameero ko khilate hn tab tumhara sanatan dharam Kahan jata ha
@@unknownguy7914😂 chup be
Jai Shree Krishna 🔥
@@mr.titan99 hare Krishna 🕉️✨
@@PushkarIngle-v2j 💖
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@PushkarIngle-v2j Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@unknownguy7914 Jai Shree Krishna 💕
Bhai maine bhi bhagwat word search kiya aur mujhe bhagwat word indian origin sanskrit word mila jiska matlab hai 'devoted to god'
Lagata hai tera Google kisi moulana ne banaya hai😂😂(once a illiterate be always illiterate)
Same,
Puri video me kuch se kuch false bol diya h isne baas.. Authenticity nhi hai 📉
Google khud confuse ha kabhi bhagavat ka matlab bhagwan batata ha kabhi blessed one aur kehta ha yeh buddism me bhi istamal kiya jata ha toh Uski baat sahi ha kuch kehte ha hinduism buddism se copy ha kyunki valmiki Ramayana 109 sarga 34th verse me buddh ko theif kaha gaya ha khud jaake search karle
@@mr.titan99 Authenticity toh tumhare kitabo me nahi milti usne video bataya bhi ha
@@unknownguy7914 Aree asmani kitab wale nikal.
@@unknownguy7914abeyy yeh pagal fokat kaa aadmi sab ki comment me jhak marra Vella 😂😂
Keep going Altamash!
We are with you
Thank you, I will
❤@@AltamashShaykh
@@AltamashShaykh pls brother make video on ex muslim girls plsssssssssd
@@AltamashShaykhinfidle noodle
@Alive_wind786 Yes, we praise them 🙌
Video on secularism. Please 😢
Har har mahadev
Har har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadevHar har mahadev
🚩🚩जय श्री राम🚩🚩𝐉𝐚𝐢 𝐬𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐦
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Jai shree RAM🚩🚩
Tere Ali ka baap hamre Bajrang Bali 🚩🚩🚩
Bajrang Bali mere kutte Ka naam hai🤣🤣
Go and check the meaning of 'Ali: Exalted.
Oh, you accept that your that god is not exalted.
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Abey bandar ko sher se tolna karneki bholbmat kar😂
tumhe pata bhi ni k Mola Ali ke Walid ka Naam kia tha aur woh kon Zara parhna unke bare me tumhari seti peti Gul hojai gi Aur Humare Mola Ali AS tu real the history bhi manti ha par tumhare bajrangbali tu real bhi ni the fictional character ko real Hero se compare karo ge 😂
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
@@Ali_edizZ009🗿👍🫡💖
Jai shree Ram
Puri duniya ke daulat = Shri krishna ke pair k ek dhool 🚩🚩
Han toh rakhlo na krishna ki murti ko apne sar ke upper. phir saari zindagi krishna ka per sar ke upper hoga
Quran Fake hai,
Muhammad Pdf file,
Ali ka baap Bajrangbali😊😊
RAAM ka Baap Mara Howa Ghoda
Parh jaa Kay Ashwamedha yajna
Quran Tere Ghar ke pas wale Ghar me ha tu real bajrangbali real ni TU Mola Ali ka Walid Hazrat Abutalib hn aur Muhammad saw sab se influential Man hn history k khud google khool lee
@@jayshreeramchandra678 RAM KA BAAP MARA HOWA GHODHA JA KAR PARH ASHWAMEDHA YAJNA
Premium crate ko unbox karun?😂
Airdrop 😂 black harpic😂
MahaDe* ❌🤡
MahaLand✅
@@SamiAhmed-vo2vi Akhī! Allāh forbade us, in the Qur'ān, and commanded us to not utter things like these.
Delete your comment, for Whose Sake you wrote this? Answer: The Divine.
Now delete this, on their vision is a cover, and seal is over their eyes and hearts.
@@SamiAhmed-vo2viAllah ❎
Nallah✅
@@Miss_uzumaki Allāh is the 'Arabic word that translates to 'THE GOD'.
1400 years old so called religion 😂
So called knowledge 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 i think didn't read Quran right if you have then you have would know about a prophet named Noah who existed 9500 years ago before your dhaarmaa came 😂😂😂😂😂
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
To 5000 sal pehle musolman ka kaba kon banaya? Aap ye batao sanskritik zaban ka umar kitna?
@@Ali_edizZ009🗿 thanks bro 🥹
@@AltamashShaikhBangla ghanta, jhooti khabre hai saari ki saari
Sanatani Army attendance>
I've read so many comments of Hindus but no one could find a single mistake just talking bullshit 😂....altamash bhai keep going !
Kabhi saamne akar baat karenge beta abhi pehli fursat me nikal
Jai Shree Ram ❤🔥🕉
Pehle internet me hi rok ke dikhao galat sabit karke dikhao real life me kya karoge ? Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Hinduon ne behuda comment karke comment section bhar diya.. Lekin..Ek hindu ne bhi is video ki koyi galti pakadke correction nahi kar paya🤔
Wo toh already proven h ki ye video mislead kar rhi hai. bass isko iski aukat dikhai jaa rhi hai..❤❤
Islamophobia is common sense
Jai shree ram 🚩🚩🚩
Camle urîne pike video bnaya hai ?
@@mr.titan99 Nhi bro beef kha ke
Prophet Muhammad pdfile
1-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
2-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
3-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
4-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
5-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
6-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
7-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
8-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
9-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
10-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
11-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
12-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
13-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
14-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
15-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
16-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
17-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
18-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
19-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
20-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
21-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
22-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
23-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
24-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
25-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
26-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
27-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
28-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
29-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
30-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
31-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
32-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
33-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
34-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
35-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
36-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
37-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
38-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
39-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
40-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
41-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
42-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
43-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
44-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
45-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
46-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
47-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
48-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
49-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
50-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
51-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
52-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
53-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
54-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
55-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
56-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
57-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
58-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
59-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
60-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
61-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
62-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
63-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
64-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
65-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
66-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
67-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
68-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
69-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
70-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
71-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
72-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
73-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
74-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
75-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
76-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
77-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
78-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
79-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
80-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
81-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
82-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
83-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
84-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
85-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
86-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
87-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
88-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
89-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
90-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
91-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
92-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
93-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
94-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
95-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
96-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
97-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
98-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
99-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
100-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
101-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
102-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
103-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
104-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
105-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
106-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
107-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
108-:JAI SHREE KRISHNA 🙏🏻🚩❤️
Jay Jay shree RAM 🕉️🚩
why your god can't save his books
Gay 1gb ram🕉️🚩🏳️🌈
@@Lion.king-1212 what happened to his books??
This UA-camr is spreading false information
@@PushkarIngle-v2j Abey verse toh search kar leta
@@unknownguy7914 Abe oo terko jyada pata hai ya hame?
Sita was 6 year old reference >Skanda purana Book 3 section 2 chapter 30 verse 8-9
Video delete kar,
Muhammad Pdf file,
Ali ka baap Bajrangbali
Kyun sach sunne se dar lag raha ha ?. Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Only Sigma and Legend Respact every Religion ✝️🤝☪️🤝🕉️🤝✡️🤝🔯🤝🕎🤝☸️🤝☦️🤝⚛️🤝🪯🤝☯️🤝⛩️🗿👍🫡💖
Video delete kar
Kyun sach sunne se dar lagta hai ?
@@unknownguy7914nhi Bhai agar hum sachai batane pe aaye toh tere bohot galat vali jagah se khun nikle kaa toh faltu kaa ch*tyapa naa kar 😔👌🏻
Video delete kar,
Muhhamad pdf file,
Ali ka baap bajarangbali
Delete kar OR quran gone ✅Delete kar OR quran gone ✅
Ali ka baap Bajrang Bali 🔥🔥
Ali baap bajrangbali
tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
There are many people here who do not have answers.
But all they have is sarcastic vulgar thing and lie.
🫶 Altamash ❤
Puppets aa chuka hai comment section mai 😂😂😂
Altamas shaikh I would like to ask you a question that if I had to choose between true friends and a future, who would I choose? Please help me i am confused😢😢😢❤
I would like to say future its more about your parents who invest a lot on you bro .i know true friends are good but thing about it bro you can come back to your true friends make your last photos with them and say them good bye. Future bro in world anyone can make joke of you.❤
Ali ka baap bajarang bali
Go and check the meaning of 'Ali: Exalted.
Oh, you accept that your that god is not exalted.
And why are you taking my mawlā 'Ali here?
All those narrations that say he tore down a very heavy door are weak/ḍa'īf/unreliable, and only Shi'as and some of the Sufis believe in them.
At least Mola Ali was real Hero but your bajrangbali is fictional character
@@syedzameer8022maybe u r talking about your nalla allah 😔🙌🏻
Seeing these Hindus getting triggered is crazy
Because she say false information
Ali ke baap Bajrangbali
Go and check the meaning of 'Ali: Exalted.
Oh, you accept that your that god is not exalted.
And why are you taking my mawlā 'Ali here?
All those narrations that say he tore down a very heavy door are weak/ḍa'īf/unreliable, and only Shi'as and some of the Sufis believe in them.
Muhammad pdf file 😂
Justice for Aisha,she was just a 6yrs little girk, shame on ola hu uber 😢😢😢
Ye toh aesa he hai ki mene ek light novel likh di , god's devi dev asur ke barey mei aur 1,000 baad kisi ko ye mili aur usne in sabh chizo ko real maan liya...
Jese anime ke characters ke log poster , sticker, action figures , fan made lore bnate hai wese he koi ne likh diya aur baad mei logo ne isko divine smjh liya
Marvel ka" avengers infinity war, end game" in sab ka script itna badiya hai, to bad me koi issko bhi "holy scripture" man lega. Avengers ke tarah wo sab bhi ek script hai, lekin logone uske sath itna emotional connection buildup kar liya ki bhulna nehi chahate hai
Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai. 👇👇👇
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain.
jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain.
Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai.
Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha.
Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai.
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai.
Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain.
Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte hai
Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission hota tha.
Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai.
Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi.
Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
@@adityakumarsharma5766lot of words for saying Geeta and Mahabharata have been corrupted (lighter word will be changed)
And no even if someone is not comparing it to the Qur'an the fact remain still it have been changed overtime hence cannot be divine (perfect from God)
Same can be said about Vedas as it has contradictions too
Don't take it as if I'm attacking your religion you're free to believe what you want to believe
But even Christian scholars agree that The Bible has been changed many times and it has over 40 authors and all are anonymous, in your last statment you've said that the changes are minor which is definitely not the case , but even if I consider them minor changes for the sake of argument it doesn't add up that following such unreliable book would decide my fate on whether I'll enter heaven or hell when the book itself is unsure of the things it has said..
Logically no one in their right mind would risk betting their eternal destiny determined by such variables
@@user_7727Xkdt You have said many wrong things. Firstly, the claim of knowing the "changes" in the Geeta and the Mahabharata is without proof and to say that they cannot be divine is wrong. Secondly, the claim of there being contradictions in the Vedas is also without any proof. Teesra, mentioning the 40 authors of the Bible and their anonymity does not eliminate their religious validity. Now to say that even minor changes make the message unreliable is also wrong because the original message is intact. The correct answer to this text is: "Geeta, Mahabharata, and Vedas are considered divine scriptures whose messages and teachings are mostly in their original form. Despite their having different versions, their basic essence and divine wisdom are still prevalent. . The opposing claims are mostly wrong or without unnecessary proof. Every religious text has its own distinct aspects and interpretations which do not undermine its divine nature."
@@adityakumarsharma5766 *"Firstly, the claim of knowing the "changes" in the Geeta and the Mahabharata is without proof"*
→the video on which you're commenting has already proved debunked that
*"to say that they cannot be divine is wrong"*
→ again bec it is not preserved and had human fabrications justifies that it is not 'divine' hence cannot be from God
Frankly if you have your own made up definition of divine I can't help your case
*"Secondly, the claim of there being contradictions in the Vedas is also without any proof."*
→ if your main books are not preserved don't you think that would be the case for Vedas too , as they are much older I know this statment doesn't prove anything but think for a second if it really was preserved why wouldn't it be the main source of guidance in hinduism reason being bec it has very little to do with hinduism
And I'm not turning back from my claim that Vedas are contradictory and factually incorrect I'll post some of them in a seperate comment as well.
*". Teesra, mentioning the 40 authors of the Bible and their anonymity does not eliminate their religious validity"*
→actually its 40+ and they were not all present at the time of Jesus many fabrications were hundreds of years after Jesus most famous example is of Paul who had never met with Jesus himself but still added a lot if misleading stuff in the bible
I know this discussion is not about the authenticity of bible I listed the example to show the contrast b/w divinity and human fabrications and how both words can't be present in the same sentence but it seems my point have gone over your head so I'll indulge in this a little bit more
*"Anonymity doesn't not eliminate religious validity "*
→My guy are you sure that doesn't sound stupid enough already, if I consider it valid then Tom , Harry can add whatever stuff they want in the bible and claim it is from God , doesn't that eliminate the religious validity of the text as it has something which wasn't meant to be... Or are you still going to believe in it blindly??
There are many religions out there some small some large all claim to be true , do you agree with whatever they say or you'll first verify if the information they are passing to you isn't made up by some random guy.. and have strong proof for their reasoning rather than believing everything on the basis of your emotions
*"Now to say that even minor changes make the message unreliable is also wrong because the original message is intact."*
→ 'minor changes' says who you're just downplaying the outright errors that the book has to make your argument sound somewhat reliable but it doesn't really change anything if you use words like 'minor/small' facts remains still that it has been corrupted hence not a reliable source to depend upon...
If it has several changes that were recorded who knows how many errors were left unchecked , how many additions and deletions were made and you still to bet everything on that by entertaining your bu saying its minor doesn't really impact the broader message like its some sort of game maybe to you but most ppl won't really trust such source of knowledge which can't even guarantee its preservation
*"The correct answer to this text is: "Geeta, Mahabharata, and Vedas are considered divine scriptures whose messages and teachings are mostly in their original form."*
→ no the correct answer would be , "Geeta , Mahabharata , and Vedas are ~considered~ NOT divine scriptures whose messages and teachings are mostly altered with and we are unable to differentiate the additions as either truth or falsehood"
*"Despite their having different versions, their basic essence and divine wisdom are still prevalent."*
→again using the divine word wrongly as usual if it has differences it cannot be divine as the definition of divine isn't subjective its an objective word meaning something which is 100% perfect and from God
About the wisdom which I won't call divine can be found in literally every life improvement books even from fictional books so it isn't really a measure to decipher whether its from God or not as even our elders and AI can drop some inspirational quotes from time to time doesn't mean they are God or divine either.
"*The opposing claims are mostly wrong or without unnecessary proof"*
→tell me which one , if they are ones in the video just post a comment on that the author of the video will look into it and correct it if there's any mistake if you're talking about my comment I believe I've said that I'll post them in an seperate comment later
*"Every religious text has its own distinct aspects and interpretations which do not undermine its divine nature"*
→I've gone through this already several times something being divine isn't decided by our whim and emotions and yes its own aspects and interpretations Maybe don't undermine its divine nature according to your own made up definition of that word , but surely it doesn't prove its sincerity either
Namah parvatipataye har har mahadev
Abe itna hi bada islam defender hai to, ex-muslim sahil or adam seeker ki live aake debate kar, par tumhari logic se baat karne me phat jo jaati h
Video delete kar😊
Muhammad Pdf file🥹
Ali ka baap Bajrangbali👑
Don't call Allah god, because god is a masculine word and our Allah isn't male or female.
Abbe ye to wahi baat hogai abbe bhai God doesn't have any gender you have made it go and read Veda first bro means pig has gender so he is your God .
God can never have son and daughter your God never existed 😂😂😂😂😂
Muhammad pdf file😂😂
B👙hma pdf file😂
@@shaheerahmad3708 babri be like: 💣💥
@@shaheerahmad3708hey hila-lu-ekber ekbar-lu-hila
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@Divya-464 Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Me tare nabi ko bool dunga toh bhark jayega
Tere Ali ka baap hamare Bajrang Bali 🚩🚩🚩
Bajrangbali ka baap main gay shre ram 🙏
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
@@Ali_edizZ009 you're kafer. Didn't you see how they slanging our Prophet? And Hadrat Ali?
@@lamlabib487GAY ALLAH 🐷
GAY MUHAMMAD🐷
GAY ALI🐷
GAY ABDULLAHI🐷
GAY IBRAHIM🐷
GAY MUSA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y AYESHA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y FATEMA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y ZAINAB🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y AMINA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y SAFIYA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y HAFSA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y MARIYA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y KHADIJAH🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y SALMA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y SAUDA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y RUHAYNA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y JUBERIYA🐷
FU☪️K SE❌Y HUNAINA🐷
@@bhijeet-69 gay ram. Gya vagwan
Video delete kar,
Muhammad Pdf file,
Ali ka baap Bajrangbali
*Sabhi Apne Apne comment aur hamare naye comment par like karo* taki hamara comment *top* per a jaaye 🤝
Video delete kar....
Jai shree ram 🕉️
Kyun sach sunne se dar lagta hai ? Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@unknownguy7914 islam ka sach bol diya jayega to pant me Susu kar dega 🤡🤡🤡
Momo pdf file😂 justice for ayesha
Ali ka baap bajrangbali aur
Aur Allah ka baap main 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😒😒😒It's really pathetic to see someone spewing such ignorant and disrespectful garbage. Show some respect for other people's beliefs instead of acting like a mindless fool.
Achcha bete Tum log jo tatti khanea valea huh 😮 ohh sorry tatti + peshab khana + pinea valea ho tum log
Apne bete ko sambal fir
@@ashataparia4980 😂😂
beta ap pehle sambhal Jao 😂@@ashataparia4980
If anybody like hindus have problems with this video
Then they should study and learn more about QURAN AND ITS MIRICLES
Log asay hi musalman nahi ho jatay
Wo is lia hotay hain k islam k pas answers hain logic ha
U guys shold really learn about it with nutral mind and u will understand the truth
All the aligations that hindus put foreard are false and they should research properly before accusing islam quran and prophet
Vote for 🕋 unboxing 👇🏻👇🏻
RAVAN ne SITA ko peldiya
Muhhamad begum 😂😂😂😂
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
@@Ali_edizZ009 Bro I felt very bad when allah says that non muslims are impure Quran 2:28
Fight with non Muslims Quran 2:29...so friends as a exmuslim report Allah as demon who spread such discrimination
@@gaminggalaxys4375 🤦♀️
@@Ali_edizZ009 Rukja bhai Burnol bhej te hai tereko💀💀
@@gaminggalaxys4375thats why i can't support hindu brothers 🤨🙂
Jai shree ram 🗿🚩
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
JAI SHRI RAM
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️
2:58 😂😂😂😭😭😭 wtf altamash bro 🤣😂🔥
Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai. 👇👇👇
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain.
jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain.
Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai.
Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha.
Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai.
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai.
Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain.
Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte hai
Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission hota tha.
Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai.
Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi.
Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
We are talking about books of God ,not man made hadees, Mahabharata and ramayana ,etc. ?
@@connordread6313 There is no talk about God in the video. An attempt is being made to prove one religion to be good and the other religion to be wrong. And I have proved that 80% of the things said in this video are wrong.
@@adityakumarsharma5766 isn't it the talk about preservation, and some of the hadiths which are not accepted ?
@@connordread6313 People do not accept certain hadiths in modern times because they believe they contradict the Quran or the general principles of Islam.
These hadiths include:
A woman inherits half of the man's share.
A woman must not leave the house without the man's permission.
Practicing magic is haram.
Looking at a dog with hatred is haram.
Men should get more inheritance than women:
The Quran says that men should get twice as much inheritance as women.
Le Muttt diya tere pure manipulation pe 🗿
👉
Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai.
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain.
jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain.
Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai.
Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha.
Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai.
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai.
Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain. Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte
दो
Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission
hota tha.
Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai.
Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi.
Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
Nice and informative thank you ☺️☺️
So nice of you
Ali ke teen baap😂 - god brahma vishnu mahesh ❤
Haaa tu mara sap god nhh dog like: jab tu hagane Jayega tab pichhwade mein jo Katega na bete
ekadam maje Maje 😂😂😂😂😂
tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@unknownguy7914tere pass bohot haina pdf file ki aulad har jagah bakwas bakwas karke reply dera hai hume pata hai bohot bakwas karta h tu batane ki zarurat nhi 😔👌🏻
Muhammad pdf file
First 🥇
Salaam Brother
You should Join Emaan Union Team
Quran fake hai 😂
All Hindus who are upset please make a video if you can contradict his argument and explain them. Send me the link aswell
Why do you need Bhagwat Geeta to explain your Quran? We never use Quran to study Bhagwat Geeta. Besides, it takes life times to understand and realise Bhagwat Geeta, so, no point in learning about Bhagwat Geeta or about its history from an Islamic channel that btw doesn’t even put the archeological facts right. Forget about philosophy. A desperate attempt to prove ex Muslims wrong by presenting wrong facts about Hindu scriptures. God know how our scriptures being wrong or let’s say being eaten by bakra or Gomata makes all the wrong in your scriptures right.🤷🏻♂️
Pheli baat ham tumhari trah apni kitab ko akela nahi chorte. ham apni kitab ko parte ha samajte ha aur yaad karte ha. Aur bakre se khaane se koi fark nahi parta kyunki wo toh yaad ha
Bhi face reveal kab karoge
Dharti ko flat batane wale ab hame gyan denge😂😂
Video delete krr
Mummhad pdf file h
Jai shree Ram
Ali ka baap bajrangbali ☝🏻🗿🚩🙏🏻
😎
👕
👖
🥾🥾
☪️✝️
Ram Ram mere bhai behenoo legend aemy keep....!!!!
@@dharmavibes555 jii, ram ram 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@Sanatani.Chingi Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Jai shree ram
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Tere Ali ka baap hamre Bajrang Bali 🚩🚩🚩
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम जय श्री राम
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Puri duniya ke daulat = Shri krishna ke pair k ek dhool 🚩🚩
han toh rakhle krishna ki murti apne sar par. phir saari zindagi Krishna ka pair sar pe hoga
Video delete kar,
Muhammad Pdf file,
Ali ka baap Bajrangbali
Video delete kr
Video delete kar😊
Muhammad Pdf file🥹
Ali ka baap Bajrangbali👑
Tere Ali ka baap hamare Bajrang Bali 🚩🚩🚩
Le Muttt diya tere pure manipulation pe 🗿
👉
Video mai aadhe se jyada baten galat likhi gayi hai.
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ke verses ke changes ko Quran ke sath compare karna irrelevant hai. Har kitab ka apna historical context aur preservation method hota hai. Islamic tradition mein Quran ko hifz aur continuous recitation ke through preserve kiya gaya hai, jab ke Mahabharata aur Gita mein textual variations hain jo ki historical manuscript differences ki wajah se hain.
jo fabricated hadith ka zikar hai, uski authenticity questionable hai. Is hadith ko Islamic scholars ne accept nahi kiya hai, aur iske details historically unreliable hain.
Mahabharata ke kuch versions mein yeh mention hai ki Arjun ne yudh ke baad Gita ka gyan kuch had tak bhul gaya tha aur unhone Krishna se phir se gyan ko sunne ki iccha vyakt ki thi. Lekin yeh bhi mana jata hai ki Krishna ne Arjun ko dobaara gyan diya jo ki "Anugita" ke naam se jaana jata hai.
Ved Vyas ne Mahabharata aur usme shamil Bhagavad Gita ko likha. Mahabharata ke ek character Sanjay, jise divine vision prapt tha, unhone Dhritarashtra ko yudh ka live commentary diya tha. Sanjay ne bhi yeh gyan suna aur phir yeh Vyas ko transmit kiya, jinhone isse likha.
Yeh claim ke "Bhagwat" shabd Pali word hai aur Buddhism se liya gaya hai, incorrect hai. "Bhagwat" Sanskrit shabd hai aur iska Buddhism se direct relation nahi hai. Gita ka origin aur Hinduism se relation historical texts se well-established hai.
Mahabharata aur Bhagavad Gita ki historical accuracy aur authorship par aapne assertions simplified aur misleading tarike se bataya hain. Hindu traditions mein yeh well-established hain aur unke textual history par extensive scholarly work available hai. Jo aapne video mai nahi dikhaya hai.
Video ka claim ke Hindus logic nahi use karte aur blindly follow karte hain, stereotypical aur unfair generalization hai. Har faith aur tradition mein log varying degrees of logic aur faith combine karte hain. Aur Islam Dharm Wale bhi yahi karte
दो
Quran aur Hindu scriptures ka comparison problematic hai kyunki dono traditions ki preservation methodologies aur historical contexts alag hain. Quran ka preservation highly systematic aur centralized tha, jabki Hindu scriptures ka oral aur regional variations par adharit transmission
hota tha.
Jaisa ki esne video mein kaha hai ke Bhagavad Gita ke verses mein substantial changes hue hain. Parantu, scholarly consensus yeh hai ke yeh differences mostly minor textual variations hain, jo manuscript traditions mein common hote hain. Large-scale alterations ya manipulations ka claim exaggerated hai.
Video ka claim ke Krishna ne kaha ke woh Gita ka gyan dobaara nahi de sakte, oversimplified hai. Anugita ke context mein, Krishna ne Arjun ko phir se gita ki teachings di thi, lekin yeh imply nahi karta ke original Gita lost thi ya unreliable thi.
Video mai repeatedly claim karna chahte ho ke Bhagavad Gita aur Mahabharata historically unreliable hain aur inke authorship par doubt hai. Lekin yeh complex historical texts hain aur inke authenticity aur significance ko simplistic aur dismissive tarike se treat karna unfair hai.
Muhammad pdf file
RAAM ka Baap Mara Howa Ghoda
Parh jaa Kay Ashwamedha yajna
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
Video delete kar,
Muhhamad pdf file,
Ali ka baap bajarangbali
Hara Hara Mahadeva ⚡
Tumhare pass kehne ke liye kuch nahi ha isliye bakwas karte ho
@@unknownguy7914 kya bakwas hai yahh
Jab facts Parr baat nahi nikalti
😂😂😂😂😂
@@krishnanusharma6186fact ki need hai 😂 iski baaki videos bhi check firr
1-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
2-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
3-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
4-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
5-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
6-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
7-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
8-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
9-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
10-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
11-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
12-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
13-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
14-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
15-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
16-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
17-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
18-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
19-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
20-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
21-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
22-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
23-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
24-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
25-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
26-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
27-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
28-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
29-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
30-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
31-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
32-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
33-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
34-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
35-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
36-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
37-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
38-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
39-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
40-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
41-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
42-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
43-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
44-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
45-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
46-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
47-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
48-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
49-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
50-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
51-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
52-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
53-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
54-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
55-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
56-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
57-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
58-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
59-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
60-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
61-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
62-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
63-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
64-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
65-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
66-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
67-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
68-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
69-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
70-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
71-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
72-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
73-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
74-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
75-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
76-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
77-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
78-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
79-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
80-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
81-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
82-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
83-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
84-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
85-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
86-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
87-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
88-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
89-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
90-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
91-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
92-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
93-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
94-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
95-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
96-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
97-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
98-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
99-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
100-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
101-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
102-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
103-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
104-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
105-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
106-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
107-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
108-:HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩❤️
Bro i fell so bad for my hindu friends. Yeh banda jisne video banaye hain use 0 knowledge hain hinduism ke uppar orr mein un mein se nhi hun ke sigma lame reply de ke disrespect karu we are friends as a muslim lets report this video✨🤜🤛🇮🇳✨
@@Ali_edizZ009 tera baap bajrangbali
Kyuki Tera naam ali
Tughe pata hai jis hazrat Ali ko to Gali de Raha hai Teri Apne hindu group dhut brahmini Hussain hazrat Ali k both respect karte hai 😂 or hum there us 🐒 monkey Baja Bali ki respect nahi karte 😂 video poori dekh pata chal chaega k geta changed hogai😂
@@DoumaMc2212tere naam mein hee mc likha hai toh tu kya dusro ke naam ko bol raha 😂
Jai shree ram ❤❤❤❤❤
Puri duniya ke daulat = Shri krishna ke pair k ek dhool 🚩🚩
Hindu don't have any logic to counter your claim they just spam some comment. As always