Turkic Hun Tatar Empires
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 гру 2009
- The Most widespreaded People on Earth with Most and Greatest empires.
West Europe Turks, Gagauz Turks, Balkan Turks like Albania Turks,Kosova Turks, Bosnia Turks, West Tracian Turks in Greece,Macedonian Turks, Bulgar Turks.Turkey Turks, Ahiska, Azarbaijanien People, Iran Turks like the Azeri Qashgai, Hamse, Afshar , Khorasan, Turkmenistan Turkoman, Afghanistan Turks, Uzbek People Uygurs in East Turkestan, China Turks, Salar Turks, Kipchak Group, Kazak People, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz People, Qaraqalpak, Caucasus Turks, Circassian, Tatarstan , Tatars Bashkortostan , Chuvashia, Crimean Tatars, Khazars, Poland Tatars, Belarussian Tatars. Turks in Mongolia, Turco-Mongols, Altaic People, Altay, Shor, Turks, Yakut, Dolgan, Siberia Turks.
Kırgızstandan EsenLikLer, Assalamu Aleykum,
The Turks were once really strong and powerful
This is a yakut (sakha) national song - TOYUK
Turks are great nation. May God bless them. Ameen
If the Ottoman empire would be a little older, youd even say that it wasnt a Turkic empire...
Atilla sweeped past Germany and into France. He was stopped at Chalons. Which is North East France. He couldnt take Rome but he marched up and down Italy. He had included German tribes in his confederation. Ostrogoths
Rugians
Scirii
Thuringians
Bastarnae
Alamanni
Gepids
Heruli
All fought for the Huns at Chalons.
@Bezdievis of course
Sarki?
@Bezdievis what are you talking about,atilla did conquere the balkan,it's a known fact that the huns whent pillaging through greece,he just never made the balkan countrys apart of his epire because an empire wasn't attila's main concern,he just wanted to torment.
@neobogard I talk about BALTIC (Baltic see), not Balkan! See North borders! Atila never seen so far in North. I Suggest You to learn geography!
The true appearance of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars and many of Turkic peoples:
Perhaps you know, that an outstanding historian-scientist D. Iskhakov wrote: ‘the true history of the Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet’.
However, recently were published books about the unwritten (hidden) real history of the Tatars by independent Tatar historian Gali Yenikey. His books present a new, or rather ‘well-forgotted old’ information about the real history of the Tatars and other Turkic peoples.
It must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists.
However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia:
According to data of many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name.
While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known facts. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples.
It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (in Tatar means 'Great Scripture').
But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, which was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of the dooks by Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’.
And here's another interesting thing:
We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Тойук
Where os Great Bulgaria?
great bulgaria? :D
plus hungarians fins estonians bulgars turks tatars mongolians some koreans and japanese all derived from the huns.
Shameless Anatolian. Stop claiming Scythians, Hephthalites (White Huns), and Khwarezmians as Turks. They are Iranian.
Khwarezmias are turks fuck off
hun atilla conquered poland and mongols too south poland/
@GFBavrupa1 Are You serious? 0:56 - Half Latvia, Lithuania, Germany, Denmark, partly Sweden under Huns??? Huns come to Baltic sea coasts? LOL
you moran turks and mongolians have the same ancestors from the altai mountains to the ural mountains
Boundaries are highly exaggerated. The Baltic States have never been conquered. Atilla boundaries included Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany, Sweden - there Atilla NEVER BEEN!
Also Genghiz Khan never been Estony, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany.
Also Osmanli boundaries arr highly exaggerated.
And what about Armenia, Georgia?
Nice video, but far from truth!
Well, they paid tribute to make sure Attila do not come. So they were in his sphere of influence, he once told to the Romans all lands to the north including islands (Scandinavia) pay tribute to me. Genghis khan for example never was in most of his lands but they were part of his empire because they paid tribute.
You should read about battle of Legnica and sack of Krakow.
Khazar "empire" was nowhere as big as present in this video. There was never anything called the "gokturk" or "karluk" empire in Europe, another delusional dream.
2:32 haha. Nice to live in a fantasy, isn't it?
ghengis khan never had any empire that occupied even an inch of European soil.
The golden horde was a pretty small weak khanate.
As for the Tartar empire, it was indeed great but it has nothing to do with turkic nomads. Turkic nomads were the bottom caste in Grande Tartary (Tartar empire).
learn and teach your fake history
tatar and turk same nation
speaking tatar and speaking turkish %90 same
Tatars are not huns ? they bit similar like prefect horse riding
All Turkish people are as nice as you ?