That was done to distract you from the fact that the rocket was doing less than 11,000mph. Though that is fast, An object would have to maintain a speed of 17,398mph to go into orbit.
I KNOOOOWW !!! I tho just picture it this way for the kids sakes though.... Dumbo , his Momma, his Daddy and his Granpa and Granma GOT TO GO UP!!!! HOW Very COOL!!! L! See That'l get it !! ;) .. squids.. you said … squids. …. squids. squids squisddds .. well , when they all fall down theyr HOME!
I think SpaceX's BFR has an head-start. Considering they have a functioning prototype already, which is currently being tested while NASA is still configuring its SRBs for SLS. What do you guys think?
True,I agree cause they already made Functioning protocol before NASA which gives them a chance to go first and getting a headstart unless it fails which is highly unlikely to happen Btw I am from india and I like to join ISRO
@@_mikolaj_ Yes but that version is no where comparable to what space X is developing currently. Also the funding for the next to versions has been cut. I will put my money on Space X getting there first.
I cheered right along with the launch team when I watched the Falcon Heavy when I watched the first launch live on UA-cam. I absolutely lost it when the boosters did the propulsive landing. That was awesome! As a matter of fact, it's STILL awesome, and I STILL flip out when they do that. 😂😂😂😂 It is just too awesome. 😁😁😁😁
@Swarup Adhikari 🤣, though real question, do you think we could have an advancement in space technology fast enough to be able to "setup" a colony on mars? Depending on our history, in the past 100 years, we have developed so much, but i am just curious,l. Also why do you hate elon musk?
Just the entire concept of space travel is just ASTONISHING.. I just cannot believe we've been able to get this far and it's finally returning. I miss the shuttle however it was older. I would LOVE to see in my lifetime a newly designed orbiter like a cruise ship sized vessel, but shaped like a plane. Wouldn't that be wonderful? I would love to see it. I would love to DO IT.
kaan cem Odemis The Saturn V: A disposable Super-Heavy Rocket People: OMG so awesome Space Launch System: A disposable Super-Heavy Rocket, basically a modern Saturn V People: iTS NoT ReUSAble i HAtE iT!!!
@Wade Not to mention the blueprints, and also other drawings of work-arounds when they ran into problems and sketches of how they made the vessel lighter that are not around. To rebuild it would be akin to rebuilding the pyramid of Giza.
There was a clip of the Falcon heavy simultaneous side booster landing, but not much of staging besides the Saturn-V. They tried plans to recover that S1-C booster, but could never get funding to develop it. One version of the Shuttle had a winged fly-back S1 booster with a Shuttle side-mounted on its ET on top.
On 2nd place shoudl be soviet energia rocket, as it coudl deliver over 70t to Low Earth Orbit. Even if it had just 2 flights, it shoudl count if those are top 10 most powerfull launches ever(sorry ariane, you're off the list)
No, Ariane is not off the list, is more powerfull than the H-IIB and Atlas V , this dude confused LEO with GTO payloads, this video is innacurate as hell.
ikr? "This rocket is so powerful it can lift 17 half-filled clown cars and a couple kegs of brew. It stands as tall as 45 humans standing on each others' shoulders and we all know how high THAT is!"
It didn't at the time this video was produced, and didn't at the time I had written my comment. That said, it would have applied to Falcon 9 as well. Plus it's one of the launch vehicles Starliner can use, as well as Vulcan, which has yet to launch just yet, along with Atlas V as I'd mentioned above..
Imagine someone from the year 2500 watches this. They would probably think look how primitive they were back then around 2000. Every time they wanted to get to space they had to send a rocket up there which burnt thousands of liters of kerosine just to bring a satellite up there...I'm pretty sure in a couple of hundreds of years there will be no rockets any more. They will have real space crafts with advanced propulsion systems....It's always a matter of perspective. If you go back just 300 years the development is insane but probably the same happens in future...Aliens probably already have developped such really advanced crafts but humans are still quite far away from that...
Mxrco_54 If people from the Middle Ages saw this, they would attempt to round up everyone involved and BURN THEM AT THE STAKE...for being satanic, demon possessed or witches!
@@DorkVader26 I remember seeing a documentary where they said Von Braun planned to assemble and fuel a Saturn V in LEO through multiple Saturn V launches... that may have been possibile but would have cost an incredibile amount of money
They stopped sending animals into space after the first manned spaceflight, the achievement earned by the USSR. The animals that got shot into space were just to prove that humans, can also go to space.
Arianne 5 is maybe one of the "weaker" rockets, but still, it got proably the most important scientific tool of the last decades up in there. ✨✨✨JWST ✨✨✨ 👌
@@nestorgarcia6221 Yes I did. I've been watching JWST journey since approx. 2014 so I could not miss this chance. By the way, the first images for the public will be available in about 6 months from now. First month is unfolding during the journey to final position (L2), then three months for alignment and two months for testing and verifying. So many things can go wrong, but they have some backup plans and even this backup plans have backup plans.
They left out the best part of Falcon Heavy launch. They returned and landed both boosters on land perfectly. Almost landed the main booster on the barge at sea. But it was an amazing accomplishment. Nobody in the world can return and land one stage, Let alone 2. Spacex is the only company in the world that is doing it.
well Ariane 5 is more powerful than H-IIB and Atlas V you have mistaken geostationnary and low-earth orbit :/. Ariane 5 can indeed send 10.5 tons in GTO (geostationnary orbit) but 21 tons in LEO (low-earth orbit). H-IIB can send 8.5 tons in GTO; 16.5 in LEO. Atlas V 551 (the most powerful Atlas launched) : 8.9 tons in GTO and 18.85 tons in LEO. Moreover, Titan IVB has a capacity of 5.7 tons in GTO and falcon 9, 8.3 tons in GTO which are lighter payloads than the previous ones.
Yeah they totally missed the difference between LEO and GTO. You could tell this vid wasn't going to be very accurate when they started using elephants. lol
A tiny bit of research and absolute basics about spaceflight would have helped them. Pictures are nice though. At least the Nr.1 is so clearly the number one, the difference doesn't matter :)
Amazing video. However I think that there is a mistake. Energia-Buran would be the second most powerfull rocket and though it had just flown twice (one was a failure) it did take off the floor
The booster stack was designed for lifting other things, and did so, once. This was important, and the NASA management resisted using the Shuttle launch stack in such ways.
Coolest thing about a SpaceX rocket is the falcon 9 and falcon heavy is reusable which means it can land on the barge or the landing zone It can’t not land without it’s grid fins
It would actually make it number 6 (Less than the space shuttle). But they also have forgotten the actual number 2, the USSR's Energia. Oh and Arianne 5's payload is also wrong.
Hello! Just a little fact check. At the end of the video, it was suggested that Saturn V produced more power than 85 Hoover dams. This is incorrect because rockets don't produce "power" per se, their output is measured in thrust and that is it. There can be power generation in rotary engines, which in turn produce linear motion, but rockets don't do that. Otherwise, an excellent and very informative video.
Man do I LOVE anything rockets!! As for Mars - my money will always be on SpaceX. But whether humans can survive the radiation of a planet without a Magnetosphere, is an entirely different bet.
Ok, I know rockets are “controlled explosions”, but that doesn’t stop me thinking every Delta 4 Heavy launch starts off looking like the base of the rocket ruptured
Anthrazite efficiency isn't really the conversation. All of the other rockets take payloads into earth orbit. The Saturn V took humans to the moon, needing much more thrust with a heavier payload. The rockets of the future that take us to the moon and Mars will be about as "efficient" as the Saturn V.
Anthrazite again, your definition of "less efficient" is based on comparing an SUV towing a camper vs an 18-wheeler fully loaded. The 18-wheeler is "less efficient" only in that it uses more fuel per mile, but also carries much more cargo.
so, you give the lifting power of every dinky rocket, starting with the European Ariana 5 or whatever. But won't give the obvious: the incredible lifting power of the American Saturn V (that puts all others into shame), and was built half a century ago!!! Nuts
Theodore Boomy Energia literally should have been #2 just behind the Saturn V. It’s a list of fact, not opinion. You aren’t respecting the facts, only a single list on UA-cam made by people on the quick cash train.
@@nicholasluigi Sorry, i didn't know the Energia deserved a spot on the list, an impressive one too. I just thought this was another guy complaining about the uploader not including this rocket, that rocket, ISRO, or what ever.
Theodore Boomy this video is named ‘10 most powerful space rockets launch ever’, so yes it should involves 10 most powerful space rocket on earth. The uploader indeed should do more research on this rocket ranking and you are disrespectful.
What an iconic night-time launch for the Cassini probe as the fiery glow of the mighty Titan IV-B emerges from the Earth-bound clouds powering the probe onward to Saturn. As the Cassini is destined plunge years later into the icy clouds of Saturn having completed the most ambitious solar exploratory mission to date.
And now, May of 2020, 3 millions people around world got infected and 248 thousand were died compared to China’s 3000 deaths and Japan/S.Koreas’ 600/300 deaths. Congrats those who still poke fun at China but are facing threats of dying.😌
Finally a video that actually shows the rockets launching
Love that sound....the ultimate Afterburner. Just ripping up the sky
The "legendary" Saturn V
still tops the list.....😋
12:00 This crowd sounds like a development team at E3 cheering during their own press conference.
That was done to distract you from the fact that the rocket was doing less than 11,000mph. Though that is fast, An object would have to maintain a speed of 17,398mph to go into orbit.
Dang, Donald Duck getting smart. I like it 😂
The cool thing about SpaceX, is they let the people go nuts and make some noise! Really adds to the excitement.
It’s amazing that the Saturn v is still the king after 50 years
@Peter Evans Ah yes. Let's compare a remote controlled Plane with a orbital Rocket booster.
The Merlin and the Raptor rockets ,today are more powerful than Saturn V ,per pound and NM. And more reliable on consumption . Period !
ua-cam.com/video/LbH1ZDImaI8/v-deo.html. Here all what you need to know
yeah, elusive Joe
Overbuilt! Awesome power!
I find the payload ratings given in whales and elephants confusing, I measure in giant squids.
Funny
I measure in domesticated rabbits.
Deepixel as opposed to non domesticated rabbits
I KNOOOOWW !!! I tho just picture it this way for the kids sakes though.... Dumbo , his Momma, his Daddy and his Granpa and Granma GOT TO GO UP!!!! HOW Very COOL!!! L! See That'l get it !! ;) .. squids.. you said … squids. …. squids. squids squisddds .. well , when they all fall down theyr HOME!
Don't they use squid in England 🤔 or was that Australia.,? Ok let me have it.
I think SpaceX's BFR has an head-start. Considering they have a functioning prototype already, which is currently being tested while NASA is still configuring its SRBs for SLS. What do you guys think?
I agree. NASA is a publicly run organization where speed means nothing to them. SpaceX meanwhile is privately-held and is headed by a visionary
True,I agree cause they already made Functioning protocol before NASA which gives them a chance to go first and getting a headstart unless it fails
which is highly unlikely to happen
Btw I am from india and I like to join
ISRO
Welp, they have 2 steel rings while NASA has basicly ready rocket.
@@_mikolaj_ Yes but that version is no where comparable to what space X is developing currently. Also the funding for the next to versions has been cut. I will put my money on Space X getting there first.
@@frederickstirnkorb3094 I accept the bet, as funding magicly came back and EUS is already under development. May the time show the winner!
Who's here after successful launch of the Crew Dragon!
Yes sirrr
Here
Yeeeeesssss
Present
Y
Saturn V: "They don't make 'em like me no more!"
InventorZahran 327 they will do
weekiely 123 Saturn v was not just big or functional but had a beauty I don’t think we see again
Falcon heavy and Starship laughing on the background
"
"built by ford"
@@fnalfnal9264 nah falcon 9 is the slickest and most beautiful..then saturn v
I cheered right along with the launch team when I watched the Falcon Heavy when I watched the first launch live on UA-cam. I absolutely lost it when the boosters did the propulsive landing. That was awesome! As a matter of fact, it's STILL awesome, and I STILL flip out when they do that. 😂😂😂😂 It is just too awesome. 😁😁😁😁
Q
50 years later, Saturn V still remains number one most powerful rocket. Space X Starship may end that when it launches.
Surely will
No point at all!!! that consumed four and ahalf million pounds of fuel ◣_◢┌П┐ mfao
@Swarup Adhikari Can I get a version of this comment that isn't for the mentally disabled?
@Swarup Adhikari you sure love emojis.. lol
@Swarup Adhikari 🤣, though real question, do you think we could have an advancement in space technology fast enough to be able to "setup" a colony on mars? Depending on our history, in the past 100 years, we have developed so much, but i am just curious,l. Also why do you hate elon musk?
Just the entire concept of space travel is just ASTONISHING.. I just cannot believe we've been able to get this far and it's finally returning. I miss the shuttle however it was older. I would LOVE to see in my lifetime a newly designed orbiter like a cruise ship sized vessel, but shaped like a plane. Wouldn't that be wonderful? I would love to see it. I would love to DO IT.
I love your vids cause I luv space 🤩🌌
My toddler loves this video. He loves to recite each rocket name. Thanks for this video!
This made me smile! Your welcome :)
Mine too! because of this video my son 4yrs was able to speak straight by reciting each names 🧡
Especially the space shuttle
Nope the space x falcon heavy space shuttle can only go to orbit and the falcon heavy can go to moon and mars👍
Well falcon 9 can if expended
Saturn V is Legend...Bravo Von Braun
kaan cem Odemis
The Saturn V: A disposable Super-Heavy Rocket
People: OMG so awesome
Space Launch System: A disposable Super-Heavy Rocket, basically a modern Saturn V
People: iTS NoT ReUSAble i HAtE iT!!!
@@OlCrunch Because that was then, and now is now... the technology has evolved
CRIPPLE N CRUNCH sls is a failure yet
SpaceX’s lunar Starship Rocket: I’m not disposable I’m fully reusable.
@@Heap_InnovatorsRBLX You cannot go anywhere without refueling.
Saturn V will always be my favourite
I heard that each of Saturn V's single engines were just as powerful as an entire Shuttle.
@Wade Not to mention the blueprints, and also other drawings of work-arounds when they ran into problems and sketches of how they made the vessel lighter that are not around. To rebuild it would be akin to rebuilding the pyramid of Giza.
@Wade raptor engine: *laugh in spaceX*
This list needs to be updated for China's LongMarch 5B, and SpaceX's F9 & FH Block V's.
CN: LongMarch 5B
US: SpaceX's F9 & FH Block V's.
RU: Angara A5 - 24 tons
SU: Energia - 100 tons
You forgot to menshend about USSR Energija,which carried Buran. 100 tons of load.
There was a clip of the Falcon heavy simultaneous side booster landing, but not much of staging besides the Saturn-V.
They tried plans to recover that S1-C booster, but could never get funding to develop it.
One version of the Shuttle had a winged fly-back S1 booster with a Shuttle side-mounted on its ET on top.
No China's rockets? Number one is "Trump One". can launch America into space.
What an applause track for the falcon heavy. Did any one else realize that?
Just outside SpaceX mission control.
What about the Energia and Angara 5 rockets. Two flights by both and Energia can put 100 tons into orbit, 32 to moon...strange..
The Falcon Heavy gets the loudest cheering award.
On 2nd place shoudl be soviet energia rocket, as it coudl deliver over 70t to Low Earth Orbit. Even if it had just 2 flights, it shoudl count if those are top 10 most powerfull launches ever(sorry ariane, you're off the list)
Hello my old friend
No, Ariane is not off the list, is more powerfull than the H-IIB and Atlas V , this dude confused LEO with GTO payloads, this video is innacurate as hell.
Amazing video!
Yes
Yes
Lol Japanese rocket is compared to whales in weight
Who's here after successful launch of Chandrayan 3
The footage and editing are both fantastic but the video could've used a little more research and a sharper script.
ikr? "This rocket is so powerful it can lift 17 half-filled clown cars and a couple kegs of brew. It stands as tall as 45 humans standing on each others' shoulders and we all know how high THAT is!"
@@Ivartshiva < Cool, how many ants would that be? lol
what about *_A i r s_*
Say what you want about the Shuttle but the launch system put on a hell of a show.
Atlas V + 2 SRBs plus a dual RL10 Centaur stage will be the prime launch vehicle for Starliner, so people ultimately WILL be flying on these guys.
Also falcon 9 which actually sent people to space
It didn't at the time this video was produced, and didn't at the time I had written my comment.
That said, it would have applied to Falcon 9 as well. Plus it's one of the launch vehicles Starliner can use, as well as Vulcan, which has yet to launch just yet, along with Atlas V as I'd mentioned above..
Just Amazing 🤩
Rocket more powerful than you can ever possibly imagine... wow
I can't even imagine how to imagine such power! No body could! Not even the people that drempt it up and or built it!
shhhhhhh!!! i want to hear the sound of the turbo in the lift off
That bov, tho. 😂
Falcon 9 is too slick. Look how sexy that thing looks
Yep, I wanna do that rocket, raw, no condom no lube. lol
@@BillAnt careful, accordingly to the video, it can take a lot of pounds until it starts to feel something
@@akiraic I bet it can take a huge load. xD
seriously guys?
lmfao
Where is energia. It launched twice and is more powerful then the space shuttle and falcon heavy
Imagine someone from middle age would See this
Imagine wright brothers if they seen this rockets 100 some yers ago what would they think or say for this technological achievement
Imagine someone from the year 2500 watches this. They would probably think look how primitive they were back then around 2000. Every time they wanted to get to space they had to send a rocket up there which burnt thousands of liters of kerosine just to bring a satellite up there...I'm pretty sure in a couple of hundreds of years there will be no rockets any more. They will have real space crafts with advanced propulsion systems....It's always a matter of perspective. If you go back just 300 years the development is insane but probably the same happens in future...Aliens probably already have developped such really advanced crafts but humans are still quite far away from that...
@@CosmosZeroX What about the possibility that humans destroy earth before we would even get there?
Mxrco_54
If people from the Middle Ages saw this, they would attempt to round up everyone involved and BURN THEM AT THE STAKE...for being satanic, demon possessed or witches!
Middle ages? F that; I am still in amazement in 2020 and so is everyone else watching. Including you.
9:05 Rockets don’t carry “payrolls” into orbit, they carry PAYLOADS.
I think he knows this. He wouldn’t have had it right in the beginning of the video if he didn’t know.
A million pounds of thrust? Is that right tough guy. Still not as fast as my Dodge Stealth!
16:42 bruh, those shots though
old movies way
Who else loved the spacesns8 launch that was cool the ending was perfect tho smack dab in the bullseye😎😎
Saturn V is the BOSS of all rockets.
x RAPTORKING x I’m pretty sure I heard some where that it’s designer made it with the intention of going to Mars and not the moon
@@DorkVader26 I remember seeing a documentary where they said Von Braun planned to assemble and fuel a Saturn V in LEO through multiple Saturn V launches... that may have been possibile but would have cost an incredibile amount of money
You' ve forgot Energia the rocket
Ya! The Energia is awesome!
Yeah Energia is cool
100 tons it crushes competition!
Virtus Drakonians vulkan was abandonned does not count here. It is nothing more than starship
@@arcaipekyun4232 A children's author from Sweden? What does that have to do with this or it's other meaning Roman Latin?
Why is the Russian Energía Rocket not on this list? It could haul 100 tons to LEO.
I don't care who gets to Mars first, I just want to see it happen before I die.
What is amazing is that the most powerful rocket ever built has been in service since 1967 THAT IS 53 YEARS
wut
? Saturn V stopped in 73
It appears this way just because the video gives wrong numbers everywhere.
Who's sending all these animals into space is what I want to know.
Nasa YEET
They stopped sending animals into space after the first manned spaceflight, the achievement earned by the USSR. The animals that got shot into space were just to prove that humans, can also go to space.
Is energia and N1 a joke to you
Exactly, energia was Succesfull supre heavy launch vechicle capable of sending over 70t to LEO
@@_mikolaj_ Wikipedia says 100t to LEO for Energia. So it should be nr. 2 in the list.
N1 did not make any successful flights.
@@ErkiEntveg so yeah, there is big question, why the heck it isn't on the list?!
@@ErkiEntveg There were test flights of the first stage, and dummy flights carrying space probes(the rocket was fully stacked)
Arianne 5 is maybe one of the "weaker" rockets, but still, it got proably the most important scientific tool of the last decades up in there. ✨✨✨JWST ✨✨✨ 👌
@@nestorgarcia6221 Yes I did. I've been watching JWST journey since approx. 2014 so I could not miss this chance. By the way, the first images for the public will be available in about 6 months from now. First month is unfolding during the journey to final position (L2), then three months for alignment and two months for testing and verifying. So many things can go wrong, but they have some backup plans and even this backup plans have backup plans.
Anyone else get a wired feeling when that commentator said “and the casinie spacecraft is on it way to Saturn” since the mission just ended
Student: why is going to space so expensive?
Because it takes a rocket the size of a 5 story building to send one elephant to space.
They left out the best part of Falcon Heavy launch. They returned and landed both boosters on land perfectly. Almost landed the main booster on the barge at sea. But it was an amazing accomplishment. Nobody in the world can return and land one stage, Let alone 2. Spacex is the only company in the world that is doing it.
Oh, those are so Epic!!
China’s Long March - 5 should be in the list.
You’re right. I think that this video was made last year and this channel just republished it.
Whats' the point? UA-cam is banned in China, so no Chinese are ever going to watch this video
@@MaazTech lmao U know what? Brain is good for us , but you don't have it.🙃
@@DrKu-ow1mi 长征5号上个月27号发射成功,你是瞎吗?
@@mattma3961 三年前就成功一次了→_→何止这次
Need to add SLS!
The Japanese rocket in this video is H2A, not H2B. It is the flight No. 26 of H2A, and the payload is Hayabusa2.
Peppa was looking for her golden boots.
China LongMarch-5B( 25Ton LEO /14Ton GTO) should be on the list.
Yes, it maiden flight was Nov/2016. Its third launch will be today (12.27.19), So we will see.
@@devondevon4366 It has launched.
Anyways the Chinese are never going to watch this video. No use of putting it up there.
@@MaazTech LOL
Also the Energia-Buran, I know another comment said it but it should probably be on the list.
Falcon heavy is my best. And cheaper than others :))
Next mission this. Thnx spaceX
well Ariane 5 is more powerful than H-IIB and Atlas V you have mistaken geostationnary and low-earth orbit :/. Ariane 5 can indeed send 10.5 tons in GTO (geostationnary orbit) but 21 tons in LEO (low-earth orbit). H-IIB can send 8.5 tons in GTO; 16.5 in LEO. Atlas V 551 (the most powerful Atlas launched) : 8.9 tons in GTO and 18.85 tons in LEO. Moreover, Titan IVB has a capacity of 5.7 tons in GTO and falcon 9, 8.3 tons in GTO which are lighter payloads than the previous ones.
Yeah they totally missed the difference between LEO and GTO. You could tell this vid wasn't going to be very accurate when they started using elephants. lol
A tiny bit of research and absolute basics about spaceflight would have helped them. Pictures are nice though.
At least the Nr.1 is so clearly the number one, the difference doesn't matter :)
Um abraço daqui do BR!!!
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
Salve
Ofcourse Elon Musk and space x will be the first company that achieve the Mars he is the best and he will change our future
Oh living in a bubble of america, doesnt know anything about the rest of the world! How ignorant ..... entitled anerican!
I think SLS(going for Artemis mission) will break all the records
Sigh.. can lift 4.5 elephants!!
Nobody launches elephants!
Something we ALL can relate to! Having to carry those damn heavy elephants all the time
what about launching killer whales?and he didnt say with or without wáter.
It's equal to 320 ducks, if you will
@@ahsanatabig6071 i like that!! 😁
poor pachyderms picked on!/? kids need to know Dumbo , his mom , dad, grpa , gram got a ride too ! ;)
Amazing video. However I think that there is a mistake. Energia-Buran would be the second most powerfull rocket and though it had just flown twice (one was a failure) it did take off the floor
The booster stack was designed for lifting other things, and did so, once.
This was important, and the NASA management resisted using the Shuttle launch stack in such ways.
Where is the Energia Rocket from Soviet Union in the list?
Humans are so amazing when we want to be
The amount of thrust of rockets can be very different like he Falcon 1 could carry a small payload and the Saturn V could carry a huge amount
The astronauts in there must be very brave to face these
Coolest thing about a SpaceX rocket is the falcon 9 and falcon heavy is reusable which means it can land on the barge or the landing zone
It can’t not land without it’s grid fins
can't wait to see the spaceX's raptor engine on the future rockets
Isnt it being used in the falcon 9 and falcon heavy
@@bigmac3373 it will be on starship, can't wait for it too
there are also other companies developping more powerfull engines
@@bigmac3373 Raptor will never be used on Falcon 9 neither Falcon Heavy.
@@CardZed oh ok
China's Long March 5 Y3 launched on Dec 27, 2019 has a payload capacity to LEO of 25,000 kg (55,000 lb), which would make it #3 on this list.
It would actually make it number 6 (Less than the space shuttle). But they also have forgotten the actual number 2, the USSR's Energia. Oh and Arianne 5's payload is also wrong.
Of course it is
If it was launched on Dec 27th 2019, NO it should not be on this list in this video. This video was posted on the 21st of December.
Noone wants to hear about China but
SupraGuy2jzgte fuck you~
Hello! Just a little fact check. At the end of the video, it was suggested that Saturn V produced more power than 85 Hoover dams. This is incorrect because rockets don't produce "power" per se, their output is measured in thrust and that is it. There can be power generation in rotary engines, which in turn produce linear motion, but rockets don't do that. Otherwise, an excellent and very informative video.
Besides China's Long March 5 and the Soviet Union's Energia, you are missing the Saturn 1B.
1:16 poor bird😔🤣
Man do I LOVE anything rockets!! As for Mars - my money will always be on SpaceX. But whether humans can survive the radiation of a planet without a Magnetosphere, is an entirely different bet.
What is the function of the four towers around the launch pad? are they camera positions?? do they do anything else?
China's long March and India's GSLV should be in the list.
Ok, I know rockets are “controlled explosions”, but that doesn’t stop me thinking every Delta 4 Heavy launch starts off looking like the base of the rocket ruptured
Where the Saturn V's 1960s technology still beats out all the new rockets 60 years later...
It doesn't in terms of efficiency, it's just morbidly bigger than the other rockets
Anthrazite efficiency isn't really the conversation. All of the other rockets take payloads into earth orbit. The Saturn V took humans to the moon, needing much more thrust with a heavier payload. The rockets of the future that take us to the moon and Mars will be about as "efficient" as the Saturn V.
@@calebreasons Exactly, still less efficient
Anthrazite again, your definition of "less efficient" is based on comparing an SUV towing a camper vs an 18-wheeler fully loaded. The 18-wheeler is "less efficient" only in that it uses more fuel per mile, but also carries much more cargo.
@@calebreasons efficiency is about cost per pound cargo delivered.
Super and amazing video
What do the big white antennas do around the launch site
Lightning rods.
Damn Space X! Thought I was listening to a Texas A&M University football game at Kyle Field. BTHO gravity! Texas is proud to have you Elon Musk.
That list is kinda in accurate.
10:47 when I see a delta 4 launch I always think it is going to explode because of the fire that forms around it
WORD! I get chills every time I see that fire.... Geeezzzzz!
Where is ISRO's GSLV XL and GSLV MK-lll
I think they are too small xd
@@muhagames-rz3nt are you Indian ??
@@muhagames-rz3nt have you ever seen GSLV F-10,F-11 huh?
@@muhagames-rz3nt well then don't think
@@muhagames-rz3nt the difference between the hight of GSLV compared to Soyuz is very less
so, you give the lifting power of every dinky rocket, starting with the European Ariana 5 or whatever. But won't give the obvious: the incredible lifting power of the American Saturn V (that puts all others into shame), and was built half a century ago!!! Nuts
Where is energia and long march 5?
Where is your respect for the fact that he can't show every single rocket ever made?
@@Surrenitie I am sorry to impress you like that. No disrespect. He has done a great job.
Theodore Boomy Energia literally should have been #2 just behind the Saturn V. It’s a list of fact, not opinion. You aren’t respecting the facts, only a single list on UA-cam made by people on the quick cash train.
@@nicholasluigi Sorry, i didn't know the Energia deserved a spot on the list, an impressive one too. I just thought this was another guy complaining about the uploader not including this rocket, that rocket, ISRO, or what ever.
Theodore Boomy this video is named ‘10 most powerful space rockets launch ever’, so yes it should involves 10 most powerful space rocket on earth. The uploader indeed should do more research on this rocket ranking and you are disrespectful.
Falcon rocket are the best in the world.
Congrats spaceX team you will reach the mars first
And after all this we can still not even explore mars let alone going beyond our own solar system. We still in baby steps with spacetravel.
We still don’t know what’s at the bottom of our deepest oceans yet!
It is a joy just to listen to the guy speaking for the Saturn 5 section.
Hello
8:33
I like Proton-M cause it's thrust colour is purple which is not in other rockets :o
But they use toxic fuels but easy to launch fuel
Apogee.... Apo-gee,
What an iconic night-time launch for the Cassini probe as the fiery glow of the mighty Titan IV-B emerges from the Earth-bound clouds powering the probe onward to Saturn. As the Cassini is destined plunge years later into the icy clouds of Saturn having completed the most ambitious solar exploratory mission to date.
I see an error, Space shuttle was to be #2, 6.6 million lbs of thrust making it #2
Wehre would the N1 be rated?
That thing barely lifted inches off the ground. It was an utter failure.
@@MaazTech Yes, but in terms of power?
@@thomasfranzi4325 In terms of power it is comparable to Saturn V.
First place theoretically
You said the Shuttle carries large payrolls. Don't you mean payloads?
Nope. Them cats is making HOT DOLLAH every time they launch
China's "Coronavirus One"
( launched in November of 2019) 🤔
Coronavirus one 🤣😂🤣😂
Can bring 20,19 tons of coronavirus into space.
*IT'S CORONAVIRUS!* the astronaut said
You such an asshole! What kind of poor education you received before!
And now, May of 2020, 3 millions people around world got infected and 248 thousand were died compared to China’s 3000 deaths and Japan/S.Koreas’ 600/300 deaths. Congrats those who still poke fun at China but are facing threats of dying.😌