Hydrogen: Nature's Fuel
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 чер 2024
- You've probably heard something about hydrogen. You may know hydrogen can be used to fuel vehicles, but did you know that clean, abundant hydrogen is used safely all around you every day? "Hydrogen: Nature's Fuel" shows hydrogen at work in warehouses, golf courses, and even breweries. The hydrogen used in these applications is made in a variety of ways from domestic sources. Hydrogen truly is nature's fuel. With hydrogen, we have the opportunity to create our own clean energy future.
Follow us on Instagram, and Twitter, and like us on Facebook!
/ und_eerc
/ undeerc
/ undeerc
"Hydrogen: Nature's Fuel" is a production of Prairie Public Broadcasting, Fargo, North Dakota, in collaboration with the National Center for Hydrogen Technology® (NCHT) led by the University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, North Dakota. Learn more about the NCHT: undeerc.org/research/alternat... - Наука та технологія
Hydrogen as the fuel source for any vehicles will help to maintain an excellent quality of our environment and keeps the good quality of things for future generation to come.
No matter how much energy is used ro produce hydrogen...as long as it provides solutions to the problem of ability to "store" , "transport " and easily "distribute" energy and better still keeps the environment green, Hydrogen is the winner as energy of the future
Felt like I was in a 1980s infomercial watching this.
So what about Stanley Meyer's system of on board electrolysis for internal combustion engines? No infrastructure necessary.
Innovating & Eco friendly concept
3:24 the irony. Look at all the energy it takes to get the oil
Extracting H2 from H2O or CH4 is basically using more electricity to make less electricity. Simple physics.
just like charging a battery?
@@sneedchuck5477 indeed.
@@sneedchuck5477 indeed, but H extraction needs at the end of the process, far more energy than just nuclear electricity into an electric engine.
Two things; No need to use electricity. Use heat, and there is many massive waste heat sources. Think about a nuclear power plant. You may have 4000 MW of thermal power, but only 1500 MW of electrical power. The remaining 2500 MW is completely wasted. You can produce hydrogen with thermochemical water splitting that requires heat. Only one example of many waste heat streams in energy production. Also solar heat can be used. Second thing is that there is also cases where even using electricity directly makes sense. This case is when there is over production of electricity in the grid, that is a common occurence when you have a lot of renewable production. Either you store with some efficiency, or you don't store at all, when you get the worst of all; 0% efficiency.
Except hydrogen can fuel your car in 10 minutes instead of waiting for your car to charge for an hour to a day.
Using non carbon sourced electricity to produce power keeps it green.
Mr. Ensco, you have made the long line of your family, going back to the beginning, proud.
@16:22 This guy is speaking the truth. Listen to what he says and you'll understand why names like Salter, Meyer and Mayne have been left out of this conversation and video. If an on demand splitter can be installed in a pump station then the same splitter can be added to the vehicle. No need for storage if used immediately. Of course that would eliminate the opportunity for a lot of money to be made.
No, this guy is wrong. It would be completely cost inefficient. To fill a hydrogen car of 5kg of H2 in 3 minutes (current average), you need a flow of an average of 28 grams/second (actually, current standards of peak flow rates are of 60g/s, because the flow of H2 cannot be constant, but let's ignore this for simplicity purposes). A kg of hydrogen contains 33,3 kWh of energy (LHV), so 28g contain about 1kWh. Filling 1kWh per second means a power output of ... 3,6 MW. This is ridiculous for several reasons :
1) You would need a 3,6 MW eletrolyser, just for charging 1 car. Such an electrolyser costs millions, and will work only a fraction of the time, i.e. when vehicles are charging, so id would be a high CAPEX asset running at very low use rate.
2) Imagine a car plugging itself to the grid, consuming 3,6 MW instantly for about 3 mins, then plugging out... No electrical distribution grid is able to withstand such harsh power consumption variations, let alone doing this for thousands of vehicles charging at the same time.
3) You still need to compress the hydrogen, and assuming you have no buffer storage you'd need a ridiculously powerful compressor
4) All your auxiliaries (H2 cooler, dryer, etc.) would also be designed to withstand the high variations
In short, it is much more efficient to have all your infrastructure downsized by several orders of magnitude, smooth out all these processes and to store H2 before distributing it.
Bonus point : you can't just add H2 distribution points beside traditional fuels for safety reasons. There are safety distances between the infrastructures required by regulatory authorities (usually several meters, depending on where you live).
@@xtdyuoz123just which company you work with I wonder? I've watched a video about a very smart person build a buggy in the 80s at home with his h2 generation on demand from a 2L soda bottle.. no need for electric motor immediately but it's beneficial to generate $ saying it has to generate huge amount of power ergo as u write it must be super compressed bigger amount needed to be readily available on demand...yada yada
U not wrong and obviously smart but you preach the same thing as the developers want ppl to know only
I invest in platinum bullion and coins because of it having a huge upside in the future devopment of hydrogen technology, so i do hope to see hydrogen fuel cell technology expand as much as we have seen EV technology expand in recent years.
Seriously, good luck , all clean solutions should be on the table.
1960s someone created a porous block of material that stored flammable gases with out a pressure vessel...my father in law, a model aircraft manufacturer, saw an article in the model aircraft magazine of that time that displayed the block...the man pouring liquid propane into it then waiting for the air to clear the he played a blow torch on the block that was fueled by a hose from the side of the block!....
So, then what? You feed the propane into an ICE engine? And what do you get; bugger-all power and exhaust gases i.e. Co2 + CH4 neither of which do we want more of in the atmosphere ! Anyway, it would just disperse, especially in heat/hot weather !
We use it in HD for our lifts.
Great show, enjoyed it very much.
Bị nghiện bài này từ thời Bảo Thy, ko ngờ lại có ngày được nghe idol mới trong lòng mình Đức Phúc cover lại. Cảm ơn em ĐP vì đã cover lại lắng đọng cảm xúc như vậy
Hydrogen? An alternative nut case idea.
It is nice to see the Vancouver busses are working so well. Imagine if you will the same busses with the entire roof covered with the latest solar panels. If we use hydrogen to make electricity why not add solar to it as well
green roofs are great for everyone under the roof plus all who see benefit also.❤❤☮☮
Modern technology can be used to farm methane with your kitchen waste in two one cubic meter plastic containers. You can compress those methane fully automated into a light-weight, installable propane tanks for charging your Aptera in the backyard 7/24. If you don't use them to charge your Aptera, you can use them to cook your food or warm your house as well. All kitchen waste will become fertilizers eventually, which you can sell/donate to vertical/roof-top organic farms around metropolitans.
What energy was used at th time of the Annunakis ? What was their mode of transport ? How did they cooked food and house heating systems . ?
Sodium pellets wrapped in Aluminum foils may be kept in normal tanks. Pellets may be conveyed to a small chamber and watet may be sprayed over. Hydrogen gas will evolve for Engines or Fuel Cells. The effluent Sodium Hydroxide can be eloctrolised to recover Sodium. This will simplify the Hydrogen storage and carrying problems. Energy density would be 30% of Gasoline by weight. May be evaluated and tested.
and errrrr, how you going to produce these aluminium foil pellets ? surely you are not going to burn yet more coal to smelt the ore ???
That is basically what Bob Lazar did in the 80's.
@@moonshiner2977 doh,have you not heard of wind and solar
@@sotrue2976 doh, have you worked out how much ore has to be refined and smelted to create the copper wire and all the oil that has to be processed into turbines for solar power, and all the smelting required to smelt the iron supports for the structures ? NO! didn't think you had :)
Yep lye and aluminum pellets can be together in a tank separated by a membrane. Activated by a spray of hydrogen then dryed and reused by burning the fuel. That's a good idea let's build it.
Photons: Nature's Better Fuel!
What is the (MEMBRAIN) between the Cells called? Also, 'what are the Materials used to make up (HYDROGEN MEMBRAIN)?
I would like to see a follow up to this program to this for 2022 to see what has changed in this industry since 2014 and if there is one i will find it ...
Biggest reason is OBAMA shut down development and production here. It is used world wide. In the 90s cutting edge was coming out of Vancouver. Jeep developed the commander to use a 60kw fuel cell to run 4 rare earth motors. Had to retrofit gas engine back in. Toyota USA also had one back then and advertised it. The PMP fuel cells could use either hydrogen or natural gas to develop infrastructure for hydrogen pumps. Done in Louisiana they had busses using PMP fuel cells. That all stopped when Obama nixed the development.
I still think hydrogen is a bugger to store.
It is easier to store it as ammonium, and process it when you need it.
A relatively new discovery is to store it as a compound in "hydrides". That looks promising.
But I don't see hydrogen as a major fuel, until we can store it.
we can store it we use these in space..
@@rltreasure
See video by Sandy Monro.
Store it as water.
Convert it as you use it.
Or die in an overheating world.
@@psulux
There is no proof that "global warming" is anthropic in origin. There have been warm periods in the past, which preceded our industrial age.
Hydrogen as a component of water has no energy.
It is separating the the hydrogen into a substance which wants to recombine with the oxygen, that confers energy upon it.
This requires at least as much energy as you can get from the hydrogen, as a fuel.
Storing the hydrogen is effectively storing that energy.
This is particularly valuable if your energy supply is intermittent.
@@paulsutton5896 where
As liquified H acts like a batter in its own right, imagine a large solar panel array next to the sea in North Africa. This could probably double-up as a desalination plant? Use the solar generated electricity to split the H from the sea water. Although electrolysis is not particularly efficient, it doesn't matter as the solar panel array would be focused on generate H from sea water and compressing/liquifying it. The transport the liquified H around the world. Remember, electricity can't be transported over wires more than about 500 miles. This to me is the core of the Hydrogen Economy. EV cars may still be around for a long time as the battery tech improves and there is already a fair amount of charging station infrastructure. However, can use H for trucks and all heavy transport, industrial applications, heating homes and so on.
Although I am not a fan of Globalism, there is a benefit to having relatively poor countries around the equator be the focus of the large solar array farms to generate the H. It's good if those poor countries benefit and increase their wealthy through the export of H.
or make better solar cells that have more than 20-25% efficiency and NONE of what you said is needed, duh!!
Sandy Monro (automotive manufacturing guru) has made a video about storing hydrogen on thin film with a coating of hydrides. This is an American invention, but similar processes exist elsewhere.
Liquid hydrogen is too volatile to transport around the world in a pipeline. Won’t work.
If its coming from North Africa, we will end up funding radical islamists from this region. Then we will have a bigger problem than Putin.
Considering batteries don't bother to use Nickel or long lasting durable material, and instead people focus on electricity density instead would make batteries less than desirable to the average person. If companies focus on making batteries last longer on the material side first it would allow more and more people get into them because they don't have to replace as much. This, also, means less and less overall waste and heavy metal poisoning of the ground from dumps and mining.
I would love to have one for my ""MOBILITY SCOOTER""
Oh, it's Nature's Fuel! Lol. For a second there it almost sounded like it WASN"T ridiculously inefficient to extract from whatever it is attached to. The smart money is on using the electricity you generate to power things directly.
I was just wondering how old this video was and noticed your comment. If this had gained any traction at all we would have heard about it before now. No, like this video, this is just an old wives tale.
@@waynethomas1726 There is still some dumbasses throwing money down this hole🤣🤣🤣
It's almost as difficult as me writing a novel.
Mind you, I've not even begun to try to write the novel, just like there hasn't been any work towards improving the efficiency.
But hey, keep living with your head up your ass, I'm sure there's solutions in there. 😉
I've driven an EV for 11 years now and it's great;
The idea of replacing gasoline with hydrogen was brought forth by the fossil fuel companies as a kind of 'Gasoline 2'; the idea was to continue the current mining, refining(now called reforming for hydrogen)and distribution networks, gas stations. However, it all went south when they finally tried to implement the grand idea because of the enormous technical issues. Technical issues some of which will never be solved without a gross ongoing economic overhead. Nope! hydrogen has a place; but, not in ground transportation; perhaps in commercial aircraft and/or seagoing cargo ships; but not in trains, trucks or automobiles.
Yeah, that's a long debunked conspiracy theory about fossil fuel companies. If BEVs are the future, existing Oil companies will be making most of their money from EV fast charging, industrial chemicals, and biofuels. Oil companies have the best locations for refueling or recharging. They will have MW fast chargers that will allow most EVs to fully recharge in about 5 minutes.
Until lithium ion batteries became affordable, hydrogen fuel cells seemed like the only realistic way to electrify our transportation system. Unfortunately, hydrogen from water electrolysis is net negative energy and affordable hydrogen is dirty. Batteries are just way more efficient than hydrogen fuel cells even if battery energy density is crap and battery recycling sounds unrealistic considering how lithium ion batteries from our electronics are "recycled" via combustion in Southeast Asia or Africa.
You really need to do more research. You sound foolish. Especially since they are currently working on the hydrogen infrastructure for cars. You must work for Tesla. LOL
@Alien Guru Yes, you are.
@@ForzaJersey I'm confused by your comment. You're aware that on a whole battery is just much better, yet hydrogen is still supported. if not fossile fuel industry, who else is behind it?
Hydrogen technology is moving well a pilot scheme in Germany seems to be going well. They tested 2 busses and the system even provides heating to locals. lithium battery HGVs have been made but have low range and wouldn't be suitable for long distance haulage. hydrogen fuel cells provide more energy density. it will certainly have a future for large heavy transport.
Awesome!
Lurking question for a while: With "salt" (sodium Chloride) commonly used as an electrolyte for Hydrolysis, what happens to the Sodium and Chlorine?
i.e. with common DIY "hydrolyzers", is the O2 produced safe to breathe? (or do you end up with a lung full of Chlorine gas?) the explosive hazards of Hydrogen produced should be obvious for most... particularly when your garage explodes. What other readily available electrolytes can be used? is/are recommended?
😊😊😊
That's because you are using the wrong electrolytes. You need potassium hydroxide. @@bernie7799
Interesting, Very nice, Next the people will be replaced by robotics in all warehouse’s, no doubt, different problems will require different solutions depending on situation, a big plus is you dent require rare metals…
Use a lazer connected to a water injector to make the hidrogen gas in the cylinder of the engine at the right timming and it eleminates a lot of problems
There is a video on UA-cam about putting solar panels in the Sahara Desert because they are in the desert they don't have cloud cover and because the amount of time they are in direct sunlight is more than other places on earth they produce a lot more energy.
The problem was being able to setup a way to run powerlines to major population centers was not cost feasible.
But what if instead of moving the power across to a populated areas you instead put the electricity into ocean water and produced Hydrogen that you could then put into ships and deliver anywhere in the world.
This could be the solution for both problems how to create enough clean renewable energy to produce Hydrogen on a large scale and not having to move solar energy across major distances to a population centers.
Over my life I have worked on many fascinating technologies which came and went: they all met a need. I learnt that because we can do something does not mean we should do it. In the end we must ask is the overall power cycle logical. I changed my mind about hydrogen fuel cells about 5 years ago when the trajectory of battery improvement, and the future potential for primary nuclear battery technology was accelerating. Fuel cells will continue to develop for space and niche markets, but I predict their use will remain limited.
I had the opposite experience. The more I had studied battery tech thinking it was the future, the more I felt like it has a wall that it will hit. The biggest is the materials required and how we would be unable to provide a battery operated car to everyone needing one. On the other side of that, you have hydrogen. You can burn it or battery cell it. It can use technologies from both combustion engines and EV's with very limited engineering to meet the gap. Hydrogen Fuel cells are more efficient than combustion vehicles now even after production and distribution of hydrogen. While hydrogen is not as efficient as a battery operated EV it is more available and the byproduct of hydrogen is water. The only issue with Hydrogen is the lack of infrastructure. EV's piggyback off of the Electric grid so much of what they need is already there. However, there is much more to developing a Hydrogen network which can also piggyback off the grid, but there is storage and delivery and in some cases filtration depending on the source of H2O that they use. Nuclear is quite a ways off just because of restrictions involving it. Nuclear will not likely end up as a domestic fuel source in our lifetimes but would be used to bolster the demands of our domestic energy demands.
@@blazetownsend8785 Thanks for your considered reply. Your point on material availability can be valid for lithium but not for sodium etc. Storage reversibility is another factor when considering grid efficiency. I notice Tesla is a proponent of domestic storage and now vehicle to grid. This is a potentially important feature that H2 systems do not possess. We may agree to differ.
Carbon is natures fuel!
Fuel cell technology is a possibility if the solar panels are made without plastic. A natural solar panel can be made from erythrosorbate or metal oxide glass can be a survivable solar panel design.
Plastics 'are forever' like diamonds so encouraging reuse rather than landfill needs to be a priority because plastics are everywhere around the entire planet and it's oceans!
The speaker is quite right saying hydrogen is the most abundant element on the planet - but unfortunately another element or two is always attached to it and it takes more energy to split the hydrogen away before it can be used as an energy source.
Have you tried refining gasoline from crude oil that you extracted out of a well in the ground and then shipped across the ocean using fossil fuels to power the oil tanker? The oldest, dumbest argument against hydrogen in the book. Classic.
Thank you for your effort to make hydrogen as main fuels.💖💖💖
I have ran my truck on hydrogen and gas together.
It changed my gas mileage from almost 10 mpg to almost 12 mpg. That doesn't sound like much. I understand that. I will let a mathematician fortune out the percentage of increase.
Before you do this, be absolutely sure about the safety of using hydrogen and safety of hydrogen itself.
As a help to anyone wanting to try hydrogen, DO NOT try to compress it and store it. Together with oxygen, hydrogen is explosive. Even if you compress the mixture into an oxygen tank, IT WILL EXPLODE. You have to have a very efficient separator to get the oxygen out of hydrogen. This makes hydrogen flammable, about like gasoline only it has more energy per cubic foot than gasoline.
Hydrogen burns faster than gasoline. So as you introduce hydrogen and oxygen into any fossil fuel engine, you can feel a tiny amount of power increase. Therefore you must be careful as to how much you add. It can increase engine wear if you don't know what you are doing.
So be careful out there. Learn about hydrogen safety and apply what you learned.
Most og you will be okay if you do this.
I do not recommend this for everyone
It's not a fosile fuel engine, it's converted to electric to drive motors
About 16 years ago I had one of the large construction management and engineering firms working on a project I was developing. The same group was also working on BP hydrogen fueling stations. How many are there out there? The problems with hydrogen fueling infrastructure have not been solved in all that time. Do you think it will be now? Dream on. It reminds me very much of nuclear fusion for energy. This has been going on at least as long as I have been alive (over six decades). Not there yet. Almost. For the last five decades.
There was a breakthrough in fusion like a day ago.. probably just a dud breakthrough though
@@tomr6955 Probably. The issue is not just fusing atoms, but making the reaction sustainable, as in 7x247365. It has been decades, and solving the engineering problems associated with a power plant is difficult. We will probably get anti-matter power first.
You don't need a fuel cell to run on hydrogen you can run a gasoline engine on hydrogen if you look up the car that runs on water that car separates out the hydrogen in the oxygen from water and gives great gas mileage and power the things that people Miss from gasoline cars
Steven, you can actually run 100% on an HHO system in a "gas combustion" engine. It will fire off the check engine light because the O2 sensors do not read and carbon in the exhaust.
The check engine light coming on is the least of your problems in that scenario. Mess around and get Steven Myers'd, don't drink your cranberry juice, or eat out for that matter.(if you're going to go around pushing water as a replacement gas that is)
Such a nice reply. Point if fact, I and a family played around with HHO cells 12 years ago. Put a couple on our personal vehicles. His was a blazer with a 4.3L. Did some work in Boston on a weekend. Fuel pump went out and couldn't start vehicle. Flipped switch on fuel cell, vehicle started and he drove 140 miles home on just the fuel cell. Used a gallon of water. There quite a few individuals with cars converted to hydrogen for fuel.
True, but hydrogen tanks cannot store as long as gas tanks because they leak more. And a larger tank is needed
@@davidgraham1422 yes same like separate eletrons of the atomic structure of nitrogen on air and runn on air with out all the things they doing to get energy, why you mix hh+o and get water on the pipe its just because if u extract the nitrogen of the air and separete from the eletrons shell u have protons that it's loose looking to combine with eletrons to go back on nature for of energy water.
So what is the update for 2023 since 2014?
Water vapor is more warm house effect than co2
NOPE!
You are correct. But ! For larger vehicles, that run for hours. Like a range extenders.
Trucks, Trucks refrigerators, tractors, many farm combine harvesters, ships, large boats , many vans
All need electrical power. You don't want to run out of electric in a ship.
Also you can use as generator s to recharge say 10 cars 🚗 at a super charger stations.
Delivery of liquid hydrogen to regular placed generators.
The sun goes down at night.
The wind is not reliable.
Cars is stupid I agree 👍
Bikes.
Everyone needs this especially w the fuel crisis of today.
With today's technology we can burn garbage and create electricity using scrubbers and filters and the smoke that comes out of the incinerators is clean and safe check out peel recovery where they burn garbage?
With a green way of getting hydrogen you get water and we need water.
This information is exciting. But need to about the risks uncovered
The Real New Next Auto, Hydrogen!
Hydrogen can also be produced by sending a certain frequency of radio waves through water. John Kanzius proved it.
I saw an experiment where sound waves of certain frequencies were used to split water into O2 & H2
*We also proved we can get to the moon but we don't use it for everyday travel ya PEANUT.* 🤣
There used to be a video of a Dr experimenting with stuff to help his wife's cancer, I think. & he discovered splitting water with a radio or microwave frequency.
@@solomon-uu5xh
That was him! John Kanzius.
Fantastic story changed my view on hydrogen use for cars etc.
The begining of this video reminds me so much of the proclaimations of nuclear power made in the 50's.
Plasma gasification is a win win tech. You can get syngas, syndiesel, burn biohazrds, unrecylable plastic, almost anything with very few pollution
A misunderstanding about Hydrogen is that it is thought that less energy is needed to split Atoms and that you get more energy out when you recombine them, not so, there is an overall energy loss in the process, which means it takes more in to get less out.
You are correct but these cells had an efficiency of 96% back in the 90s
Australia gets hydrogen from wells as helium is found. South Australia and some is known elsewhere.
Thanks. I didn't know that and I live in SA I will look into it just for my own knowledge. cheers
Amazing Technology, Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library SilentWeaponsForQuietWars Thank You
8 years past and buying a hydrogen car isn't mainstream at least near where I live. Although I wouldn't mind it. I heard about the progress made in California where there were H2 cars sold and driven by real people.
Maybe one day.
Can't get electric cars around here, not because of lack of wanting them, it's because of lack of supply.
I've been saying this for years. Converting vehicles to Hydrogen gas. Creating the gas from water using Solar home powered electrolysis. 8 hrs can fill 2 S/S tanks @ 1500psi = 600km from 2 liter engine vehicle (375mls) VIRTUALLY FREE! (price of the water - damn site cheaper than gas!) Burns clean - no fuel cell required!! Only inconvenience have to refuel at home - long trips extra tanks. Or take solar electrolysis system with off-grid trips.
Now, seven years later, hydrogen seems going nowhere.
LOL. Half the world's car manufacturers are developing hydrogen cars. Airbus is developing an A380 that runs on hydrogen. Trains and buses are running on hydrogen. It is you that is going nowhere.
@@kuei1215 I don't think those car manufacturers, especially Toyota, are laughing.
@@blam1328 many more but do not have time to list
@@blam1328do you watch a lot of Beavis and Butthead show also?
Renewable natural gas is the answer to achieving lowest carbon emissions. If I were to buy a hydrogen fuel cell truck for use in the long haul how will I compete with trucks running on RNG? Hyliions systems can get net zero carbon emissions today and a 1000 mile range, 75 miles fully electric. Hypertruck ERX with RNG is the game changer and the infrastructure is there now.
What options do we have on the market today?
How did you make your hydrogen?
It just proves how much power and control big oil has
Fully agreed.
where can I buy this?
The hydrogen systems used on buses don't work properly in the northern US states in the winter. The cold temps prevent the systems from operating well enough to generate enough hydrogen. The Chicago Transat Authority were give a couple of hydrogen buses to try out but it was winter and they took them out of service after a few weeks. They shipped the buses to Toronto with the CTA name still on the buses. Remember that heat is energy and the better fuel is propane because it's 37 percent hydrogen and burns hot and very clean and is 104 octane. Propane is found naturally underground mixed with other games such as butane and methane which is natural gas. Only about 30 percent of propane is sourced by cracking a barrel of oil in the refinery process. LPG propane is the world's most popular alternative fuel for cars and trucks.
LPG is indeed a very good alternative for cars, but if you want to get carbon neutral you have to use stuff like batteries or hydrogen and by both it depends on how they are produced on how neutral they get
300 million registerd vehicles in the US
Being on the cusp of a radical improvement like lith-ion to graphene batteries brings with it an obvious problem from the short term consumer perspective relating to electric vehicles. Why buy the old technology today when the new technology is just around the corner? It is hard to imagine that the problem of 'immediate obsolescence' will not create an enormous and legitimate disincentive to switch now. It seems the smart thing to do would be to wait ten years. But how does that notion interface with our dire climate change timeline? It would be very useful to know what the exact points of obsolescence would be. Could current charging stations be used with the new technology, for example? Could your 'old' EV battery be replaced with a 'new' graphene one without replacing the entire vehicle? Bringing such answers to common knowledge does seem as important as it could be, and therefore pressure against these questions being premature seems appropriate.
First time I heard the phrase stopping power in that context lol
Hydrogen is free on mass scale of tides rivers Oceanside handy.
Vast quantities of cheap Hydrogen can be generated as a byproduct of cooling nuclear power plants. A nuclear power plant generates enough heat to crack the Oxygen/Hydrogen bond of water.
J R
Not true! Temperature is not high. Using part of the electric power, yes by hydrolysis using far more energy than later extracted..
You are confusing hydrogen by large quantities of condensing water as absorbed by air.
I think we should just mandate that all new cars have a Mr. Fusion installed. If Doc Brown can generate 1.21 Gigawatts with a banana peel, a half can of warm beer and some coffee grounds....not doing time travel should provide all the power we need. Right......
This is the energie to use today , we just go for hydrogen, for shure , go go go
hydrogen leaks are dangerous for the ozone layer , les fuites d'hydrogène sont dangereuses pour la couche d'ozone !
wrong
@@bpeter4397 you are PhD in chemistry ?
can h be made from solar roof panels?
Not directly. But it could power an electrolyzer, compressor (for storage) and fuel cell to get electricity back - with an overall efficiency of about 27%. Or you could store that power in batteries at 85% efficiency, or use the electricity directly. Doesn't make sense to use the less efficient method of energy storage.
My question is can we catch the water generated from the hydrogen burn and make more hydrogen from it?
Edison generators and dynamos with inverters and transformers can deliver any amount of current and voltage AC power continuous peak power without fuel wind or water. Conservation of water can be enhanced with Edison generators and dynamos power plants. Hydroelectric power plants can be reduced or eliminated with Edison power plants.
KI
Go hydrogen the best idea
...mini wiconi = watr is life (Lakota)... :-)
You use solar and wind to make hydrogen, oh what a thought.🍁🍁🍁🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
I hate it when they call Hydrogen an energy source. It's a battery. Critics complain that we can't store the excess energy from solar or wind to use when we need more, but Hydrogen can be used for this. When they call it an energy source, then they use fossil fuels as the base instead of electric hydrolysis and they march right past the green solution.
👍👍
Hydrogen is a nature fuel
What about Stanley Meyer's on-board electrolysis system, the one that cost him his life. Why not revisit that concept. It seems to be a LOT simpler !
Stanley Meyer was a convicted fraudster, he sold "dealerships" for his supposed hydrogen cell - but never delivered the goods. That's because his so-called "water car" was actually powered by a hidden fuel tank, not the little electrolyzer merrily bubbling away. If he had actually delivered any, it would have quickly become obvious that it didn't actually work the way he claimed. So, instead he gave endless excuses of non-delivery, until his victims finally hauled him into court.
@@chrismuir8403
Troy Reed, Daniel Dingel, Denny Kline, John Kanzius, Arturo Estevez and others in the Philippines, Colombia and Japan that came upon the same concept and swore by it, all of them frauds?
I've watched plenty of videos by and about Mr. Meyer and he certainly never appeared to be a fraud to me. On the contrary, a man of principles and integrity.
I respect your opinion but my perception on this whole issue is very different. Even NASA made a big deal about finding water in Mars. Why? So they could extract from it the hydrogen for fuel to get back to earth!
This concept,(and that of magnetic repulsion) if put into practice, would absolutely destroy the strongholds of Big Oil upon our world and also the electric car and all it's needless and incredibly expensive infrastructures. It would be way too menacing to the existance of too many BIG $ interests in this planet that's why these people are discredited, silenced, jailed, poisoned or simply made to disappear.
absolutely water can be used as fuel. i see it happening but who knows when. diy for now
Arturo,
Como funciona ese systema, de donde viene la corriente.
@@arturoeugster2377
Los vídeos del señor Meyer lo explican mucho más claro que lo que yo pudiese.
I don't understand why we're not using these
Being pushed by the oil and coal companies, as they want to sell that pricy new fuel when their traditional markets decline. Problem is, hydrogen is an expensive, difficult to store fuel, so it simply can't compete with the much more efficient and economical battery electric alternative.
Yet our leaders keep pushing this non viable Hydrogen energy source. those same leaders meanwhile do all they can to restrict oil production, hence we have joe bidens crazy high gasoline energy prices.
Perhaps a better energy storage method than Bitcoin, but the latter going up might be less damaging.
Prarie Public , a polite way of refering to public,(the people ) From long ago in time as Governments and the rich refer to the people as cattle, or those that they feed off.
I am sure many would still remember the reference to us as cattle. I was amused to see prarie public used ,how quaint.
reflector tegnolegy is actually resistor tegnolegy😂❤
the feilds of the atoms create feilds bi the demand of inside and outside so that they create more exerlteration for its feilds to resist the directly leaking in to ❤
you should have seen this when you think you shoot out a neutron of gold out of a gold atom in a sheet of gold atoms ❤❤❤
there ws not a gap in the sheat❤
Electricity is required to charge batteries . At present the amount of electricity required to charge batteries can not keep up to the expected number of vehicles that will be on the road . Hydrogen is a better source of power .
Time will tell .
New battery technology has just arrived; diamond nuclear batteries that will provide continuous power without degredation.
💥 boom
Future future in wchich future.
This sounds to me like taking a 1/2 step back into the past instead of 2 steps into the future with solar panels, wind energy, and geothermal.
Wind and solar is a step back
Both of those are extremely inefficient
Hydrogen is abundant
@@certified_boogeyman But it takes so much work to get energy from hydrogen, (not to mention storage) whereas solar and wind and hydro produce clean electricity immediately.
@@rickrutledge9363 wind and solar are not immediate and they're not clean
Solar panels are made of coal. The facilities that build solar panels and wind turbines operate on "fossil" fuels (fossil is in quotes because oil doesn't come from decaying fossils).
My cousin works in the wind industry and those turbines require constant maintenance. Solar panels become cloudy and lose potential over time.
The amount of electricity we get from wind and solar is 12% combined. And they still require gas and coal to run their operations!
Green energy is a facade. If the government really cared about the environment they'd promote and subsidize regular Americans gardening organically and organic urban farming.
But they don't really want that. They just want to funnel tax dollars into these private sectors at the behest of the lobbyists.
Hydrogen is storage
Even alcohol powered internal combustion engines would be better than every option we have today because anyone could create their own fuel
Wind and solar is a joke
What solutions do we have today? If we started a crowd funding project today what would we do?
Increase RNG production immediately!!
What about Thorium reactors?
A good storage for energy is the clouds and would be easier to harvest hydrogen from a vapor . Well, that's what celestial late beings do. Just need a different vehicle.Just beli
If hydrogen is just a storage solution for energy, then why not use LFP batteries.. seems more effective
Remember the Hindenburg, hydrogen is extremely flammable and not as safe as gasoline or diesel
The skin of the Hindenburg was made of solid rocket fuel. It ignited due to electrostatic fluxes from a nearby thunderstorm. The hydrogen in the Hindenburg burned for mere seconds, with most hydrogen dispursing in the atmosphere. If the Hindenburg had safe materials, the disaster would have required a direct lightning strike or an external ignition source. Hydrogen is as safe as gasoline when stored correctly. In many ways its actually safer than gasoline.
Salt is abundant and could be answer to energy?
Didn't it say the cell had Platinum in it? This is a very rare element and prohibitary expensive
But does it not explode easily
How can you take out hydrogen and have hydrogen as part of you byproduct?