Your slightly sarcastic sense of humour has been the cause of coffee being sprayed over my laptop, more than once. Keep up the jokes. Fulton Sheen knew how to speak about heavy subjects whilst keeping his great sense of humour. You do to. You can be funny in a subtle way sometimes which makes me laugh even more. I love your content and the clarity it brings to the faith. Blessings from Australia.😀👍
Yeah, fulton sheen never got on television and referred to other religions as being heretics or said their founder was possessed by the devil. If he had Life is Worth Living would have been pulled off the air after the first commercial break.
This was absolutely shocking to hear. I had to refer back to the article and the footnotes to see it for myself. So many "good Christians" view Luther as a saintly man who saved Christianity. Heck, Francis even put up a statue and made a stamp of this heretic! How is this even possible? Come, Lord Jesus, and establish your permanent Kingdom here on Earth!
If luther was around today he would be a fast food glutton, 4 divorces in, heavily addicted to liquor and porn hub and running a mega church down south.
The Church hierarchy at the time, just like today, was horribly corrupt and needed to be protested against! The Protestants were definitely the wrong bunch to do it! Ironically it was the “counter-reformers,” those Catholics as the name implies who were called to counter the Protestants were actually the real reformers of the Catholic hierarchy with their magnificent writings, pious prayers, great enduring patience, and lots of tough love! Sts. Teresa of Avila, John of the Cross, Robert Bellarmine, Charles Borromeo and many others were the real reformers, not Luther or Calvin and especially not fat Henry VIII!
In our time, it is Francis who loves Luther, having statues and Vatican stamps made to commemorate this sad dark soul. Pray that Our Lord grant this obstinately blind Francis, a Pauline Conversion before his coming death and judgement ( not that Francis believes in hell, as he said that no one goes to hell they just disappear!).
If you didn't say who it was is have sworn it was 'prophet' Mohammad speaking. They certainly sound alike. Maybe 'cos they're actually from the same spirit.
Martin Luther and many other catholic priests where instrumental in translation of Biblle into common language of people. At that time the volgate was in Latin that few knew or spoke
@@edithhewson7208That’s because 98% of people couldn’t read. He lied, changed the text of the Bible, and removed 7 books from it. Nothing he did was good or commendable.
Sounds like Luther was a guy totally guided by his bodily functions. That evertime he had a "feeling" he wrote some idiotic line about what he believed. Nut case. Great video Kennedy. BTW, I've been using your oil and beard balm and it's been awesome! Finally I'm able to contain the wild bush on my face, and not to mention no more itchy skin. Thank you for amazing product! God bless you and your family. Ave Maria!!!
Someone who is good at memes should make a response to the Babylon Bee's "Best Luther memes to send to your Catholic friends" with just these horrible quotes as motivational posters.
Opium, cannabis, alcohol, amanita muscaria, other mushrooms, ergot fungus on rye bread could make you go crazy, there were also certain nectars from plants that caused hallucinations.
Oh, listen to Lloyd deJongh on his YT channel - it gets worse! Martin Luther was a NASTY, unpleasant person...in addition to being a diagusting p*g, pervert, sociopath who LOVED to torture/kill animals, and a demonic and blasphemous voice!
Msgr. Patrick F. O'Hare, LLD author of Luther, The Facts About, went light on how evil this person really was. Of course, he wrote the facts about him and spared us the really dark side of him. Today, especially Protestants, need to know just how evil the man was. Back in his time, the lukewarm Catholics followed him while the devout held on to the faith. Archbishop Lefebvre is the devout Saint of our time. Praying for his canonization.
I'm ex-pentacostal to catholic that converted upon hearing the protestant Bible got altered with books taken out/ whole verses changed/ as well as mistranslations. Then I thought if the Bible was the sole authority on Christian life, why did they have to do any of that?
Ah ah ah... you can't beat "salvation is by grace through faith in the atoning work of Jesus Christ. Half of Christianity bowed down to this, and even the RCC had to reform to a more Apostolic position.
Luther thought that when he was to celebrate the Consecration of the Holy Eucharist as a Catholic Priest, he was 'making' Jesus' body and blood rather than the bread and wine being changed into Our Lord's body and blood.
Luther's comments shock me, partly because Lutheran theology is the only Protestant theology I'm familiar with. Mr. Hall quotes accurately, I'm sure. But Luther's false beliefs tell me mostly about his character flaws and reveal too little about what 21st-century Lutherans believe. When I talked with a Lutheran friend of mine about some things Luther believed, my friend replied that Lutheran's disagree with Luther on some points. This video reminds me of where we discovered many of Charles Darwin's many character defects. But you already know that they don't falsify his theory of evolution any more than my faults disprove what I know about my fields, philosophy and computer science. Mr. Hall is welcome to tell us about what Luther, Darwin, or other people believed. On the other hand, it's fallacious to conclude that someone's vices disprove some theory he taught or some doctrine he believed. Luther's imperfections may have helped him draw some conclusions he drew. But I commit the genetic fallacy by saying that a belief's truth or its falsehood depends on what got me to hold that belief. If I say, "Don't believe Lutheran doctrine, since Luther was an evil man," that's an example of the ad hominem fallacy. It's a way to attack someone instead criticizing what he believes. "Ad hominem" means "against the man." There's a major problem with Luther's moral theology. For anyone to be guilty, he must have free will. People have it, but animal don't. That's why no one would imprison an angry dog for mauling an infant.
A sinful mindset and lifestyle is most definitely going to affect a person’s relationship with God and thus his beliefs which influence his teachings. The spiritual life and the salvation of millions of souls is not as trivial as philosophy or computer science. The guy literally teaches people to “go forth and sin boldly” and to reject reason and conscience. We are not talking about mere character flaws but rather indications of internal evil and , like any cult leader, his followers should be made aware. If you follow him, you are in danger of becoming like him.
@@Sarah-bug I agree with you. But I hesitate to say philosophy is trivial. Naturally, someone's everlasting salvation matters much, much more than anyone's philosophical theories. Still, about 62 Popes have recommended St. Thomas Aquinas's philosophy and his theology. You know what "transubstantiation" means, I'm sure. But some people may not know that "substance" and "accident" are Aristoelian-Thomistic jargon. "substance" means essence. An accident is property a person, a place, or a thing can gain or lose and still survive. "Substance" can also mean "an object that has accidents." Being-read, being-bald, being-soft, and being-hard are accidents. Luther was a heretic like every other Protestant revolutionary. I wasn't recommending Protestantism. I merely told everyone that someone can be vicious, even if he did or wrote many great things. Lord Bertrand Bussell was a brilliant philosopher and a great mathematician. Who would warn me not to read, say, Russell's book "An Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy," since he cheated on his wife and bragged about that in his autobiography? Maybe you're familiar with the late Protestant apologist Ravi Zacharias. Though I'm a traditionalist Catholic, I loved many of his lectures. Sadly, soon before his death, his "ministry" discovered that he raped a woman. That was terrible. And I can still hardly believe he hid his perversion for years. But his "dark side," never appeared onstage. www.christianitytoday.com/news/2021/february/ravi-zacharias-rzim-investigation-sexual-abuse-sexting-rape.html I'm not condoning evil. My point is that even bad people can good, even admirable things. Here's some information about Lord Russell, whom I admire for his work, not for his character. philosophynews.com/what-can-be-learned-from-bertrand-russells-life-as-a-philanderer-part-ii/
Please don’t call him that. His name is Jorge the Jesuit. Francis was my confirmation name, and Jorge doesn’t deserve to be known by the same name as a man so close to Christ the King that he received His Wounds. Not that I do, i don’t think so highly of myself as to make that kind of statement, but I was so moved by Francis’ story that I chose that name as my confirmation name in hopes and aspirations that I may live a Goodly and God-Fearing life in the manner in which he did.
Are these the actual teachings / doctrines of the Lutheran Church or is an overview of the writings of Martin Luther with the intent to attack the legitimacy of their Church?
@emmap1159 well. I've got no nickel in this, but the fact a decent number of sites assert there is plagiarism in this document and no references were cited in this video of what the Lutheran churches actuality teach in the present, I would call it suspect. But if it validates your beliefs, you do you.
@@363catman My only expertise on the subject is regular online debates with protestant followers and their beliefs that align pretty faithfully to what we hear Luther say in these writings: that we are all sinners, not worthy ever of salvation so our works don't matter, that the last supper was that..just a supper despite Jesus's insistence in John 6:53, that the bible is the direct word of God but which they have no problem revising with every new edition, that Mary and the saints are idols and dead as sinners like the rest of us, and that the Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon. Pretty much word for word what we just heard. They are splintered into 40,000 denominations which begs the question: are Lutherans the only ones going to heaven? Because they can't all be correct.
@@emmap1159 we are still living with the hatred created by both sides from the reformation. Remember in the pre-1776 world dissenting from the state religion was looked at in the same light as treason. I know a lot of folks around here take huge exception with the concept of ecumenism, but when an honest discussion is had we agree on more than most assume. And after 450 years of mutual hatred, trying a different approach seems pretty reasonable in my mind.
@@363catmanWell, if you watch many Catholic videos as I do, start scrolling through the comments because we're bombarded regularly by vitriolic criticism of our faith from every one of our reformist sectarian brethren, pretty hateful stuff actually. They are duty bound to save us apparently through slander. This series on Luther is needed because up till now, we had no idea what we were dealing with or what the impetus was for the constant badgering. One person told me that his church teaches that unless they get in our face and Evangelize, that their salvation wasn't genuine. So then you defend your faith using weaponized scripture as they do, and that really enrages them.
Calvin - Cauvin - Cauuin - Cohen? A study on "Who was John Calvin"? Points of interest: Disecting the surname study correctly 1) The official name of John "Calvin" according to French cathedral registries is CAUUIN. That is "Cau - uin" 2) The second "U" was originally a French "V". This "v" can either be a vowel or consonant. If the "V" precedes a vowel it becomes a consonant. Therefore it is pronounced "Cauvin" in French. 3) However, it is well documented that "Cauvin" Anglicized his name taking it into the English language where the second "U" is NOT read as a "V" but retains the "U" sound - Cauuin. 4) In the English name transition, the last three letters are therefore read as "uin" and pronounced as - - "whin" (short "i") due to the "au" diphthong preceding it being "whiffled out" as seen in the 1611 dictionary. 5) The diphthong "AU". This is pronounced in the old French as "O" as in "foe". 6) Therefore, in the Anglicized form the name Cauuin is correctly pronounced C -oh - whin (short "i") exactly as the English "Cohen" 7) The "L" in the name was from Cauuin's adaption of the Latin name he used in his university days, that of "Calvin", by which name he also became known in English as well as Cauuin. See the 1611 French/English dictionary for the consonant "L" in the middle of a word as being a silent "L", thus the archaic "Calvin" is still most properly "Cauuin" in both English and French. (dictionary link next column at bottom) References: John Calvin was not born "Calvin". id3417.securedata.net/solarsabbath/calvin.htm
Luther sounds insane! To sin more in order to silence the conscience sounds like the advice of a mentally ill person. Did anyone ever actually read this who joined the reform? If they did sounds like they loved sin more than Christ.
Like a hundred years after him there was a guy just like him in Judaism named Sabbatai Zevi, who did massive damage to Jews too. Crazy how religions get hurt most from people within our own religions.
@@Thor-Orion well Martin Luther didnt damage the church he lead people away only. The only one true religion is unwavering because God does not change.
22:51 to be fair do you think thatt a tad out of context & the heretic Luther meant “he looks on God as no more than a scoundrel “ to mean Luther himself is the scoundrel & looks to God for mercy ? Not trying to defend the man but I just can’t imagine ever calling GOD the literal King of the Universe a “scoundrel “ unless like you said Kennedy , ML is possessed by Satan .
However much I tried to believe in Catholicism, I find the book of Jonah to be *NOT* believable. As metaphor yes but literal, nope & no. Catholicism needs to back away from literalism. Catholicism shouldn't follow in the footsteps of fundamentalism bc that's *NOT* what the religion is about. It is about createing better people
Googling some of these quotes they seem to be horribly taken out of context. I'd love to bash Martin Luther's teachings, but this is more like bashing Saint Augustine for saying "Lord, make me chaste, but not yet".
Saint Augustine was tempted but resisted for the sake of the cross. Luther gave into temptation but claimed salvation because of the cross. Which one stands a chance of being right?
Edited to include name: @subrosa7708. We have a winner! Someone who (may or may not have) listened to factual reason and rejects it as being of Satan. You ignored every single declaration written by your savior, Luther. Listen to the podcast again, troll. God grant you a saturation of grace. May you be blessed every day for the rest of your life. And stop this idiocy of serving a mere fallen angel. Serve Christ Jesus who died for you.
Respectfully may I say your statements are based on biased pre-Vatican 2 Catholic apologetics. Modern RCC scholars including recent Popes have spoken well of Martin Luther. There is a statue of Martin Luther at the Vatican and Pope Francis has cordial dialogues with the Lutherans....but not with the Confessional Lutherans who are not lqbtxyz (Missouri Synod USA, ELDONA Synod in Europe).
And that is wrong. Once a heretic always a heretic. They didnt repent of heresy so they remain heretics. No matter what the pope says. They remain heretics.
Modern RCC scholars are suspect, along with much of the post VII baggage. Luther was a heretic, and no apologetics from Bogus Ordo Catholics, a heretical Pope, or erroneous scholarship will diminish, nor eradicate this truth. Both St.Theresa of Avila and St.Padre Pio, stated that Luther for kindling rebellion against Holy Mother Church, is reaping his just eternal reward. There's is nothing to convince me to disbelieve this.
I hear echoes of Luther in many statements coming from the current pontificate... 'make a mess'...'everyone is welcome'...'don't proselytize'...
Your slightly sarcastic sense of humour has been the cause of coffee being sprayed over my laptop, more than once. Keep up the jokes. Fulton Sheen knew how to speak about heavy subjects whilst keeping his great sense of humour. You do to. You can be funny in a subtle way sometimes which makes me laugh even more. I love your content and the clarity it brings to the faith. Blessings from Australia.😀👍
Careful spraying coffee over your laptop. I lost a nice Lenovo once by spilling water on it. :(
Yeah, fulton sheen never got on television and referred to other religions as being heretics or said their founder was possessed by the devil.
If he had Life is Worth Living would have been pulled off the air after the first commercial break.
Excellent show exposing the grevious errors of Luther 🔥👏😎. Thanks! God bless 🙏⛪⚓👑.
Man, this chat is very needed.
This was absolutely shocking to hear. I had to refer back to the article and the footnotes to see it for myself. So many "good Christians" view Luther as a saintly man who saved Christianity. Heck, Francis even put up a statue and made a stamp of this heretic! How is this even possible? Come, Lord Jesus, and establish your permanent Kingdom here on Earth!
I knew he was wrong and heretical but WOW I'd never read or heard his writings in this detail before. Absolute insanity
If luther was around today he would be a fast food glutton, 4 divorces in, heavily addicted to liquor and porn hub and running a mega church down south.
LOL!!!
🤣😂🤣😂
Yikes
Ain't it the truth...
Of Luther were alive today, hed be trans and James Martins right hand man!
The Church hierarchy at the time, just like today, was horribly corrupt and needed to be protested against! The Protestants were definitely the wrong bunch to do it! Ironically it was the “counter-reformers,” those Catholics as the name implies who were called to counter the Protestants were actually the real reformers of the Catholic hierarchy with their magnificent writings, pious prayers, great enduring patience, and lots of tough love! Sts. Teresa of Avila, John of the Cross, Robert Bellarmine, Charles Borromeo and many others were the real reformers, not Luther or Calvin and especially not fat Henry VIII!
Dont forget St. Francis de Sales!
There were no Pro-testants before you guys Excommunicated Luther. He was a true believer in the Roman System... even had a Doctorate. Do the research.
Its time to speak up and stand for truth and set protestants straight. Its the charitable way.
Dude was 🦇 💩 insane.
In our time, it is Francis who loves Luther, having statues and Vatican stamps made to commemorate this sad dark soul. Pray that Our Lord grant this obstinately blind Francis, a Pauline Conversion before his coming death and judgement ( not that Francis believes in hell, as he said that no one goes to hell they just disappear!).
Whereas the Church elevated women Luther knocked them down again. That's why it's erroneous to conflate Protestantism and Christianity.
He sounds ALOT like Muhammad in the hadiths.. 🤔
I would love to play the woke game on the woke. It’s not a reformation from Luther it’s a deformation.
If you didn't say who it was is have sworn it was 'prophet' Mohammad speaking. They certainly sound alike. Maybe 'cos they're actually from the same spirit.
Luther was a total nutter.
Thanks for promoting Lloyd DeJongh. No longer excusing the fake things Catholics blamed for hundreds of years.
Yes! I followed Lloyd after Kennedy had him on. Lloyd is going deep into Luther. Crazy stuff. He does a deep dive into Calvin too
Love Lloyd! So glad Kennedy had him on.
Lloyd deJongh is the bomb! Love him! 💜
Martin Luther and many other catholic priests where instrumental in translation of Biblle into common language of people. At that time the volgate was in Latin that few knew or spoke
@@edithhewson7208That’s because 98% of people couldn’t read. He lied, changed the text of the Bible, and removed 7 books from it. Nothing he did was good or commendable.
I knew Luther was confused, but I didn't know he was this bad!
And no wonder why the protestants have divided into so many denominations...
Wow, very eye opening. It seems obvious that the devil himself was speaking through Luther…
Watched Lloyd De Jonghs work about Luther and Calvin and yeah Luther said all that and worse like calling reason the devils wh...re ...
Luther couldn't stand looking ar a picture of Jesus. Why would you listen to someone like that!??!
Sounds like Luther was a guy totally guided by his bodily functions. That evertime he had a "feeling" he wrote some idiotic line about what he believed. Nut case. Great video Kennedy. BTW, I've been using your oil and beard balm and it's been awesome! Finally I'm able to contain the wild bush on my face, and not to mention no more itchy skin. Thank you for amazing product! God bless you and your family. Ave Maria!!!
Well said. The father of moral relativism.
Someone who is good at memes should make a response to the Babylon Bee's "Best Luther memes to send to your Catholic friends" with just these horrible quotes as motivational posters.
This is incredible!! I never knew Martin Luther was such a heretic.
This is credible!!
what illicit drugs were around at luther's time because it sounds that he was high as a kite
Opium, cannabis, alcohol, amanita muscaria, other mushrooms, ergot fungus on rye bread could make you go crazy, there were also certain nectars from plants that caused hallucinations.
Raymond Taouk was in the SSPX Seminary with me back in the early 2000s. He is a very intelligent guy
This man was a mad one. He's teaching are outrageous!🤮
Oh, listen to Lloyd deJongh on his YT channel - it gets worse! Martin Luther was a NASTY, unpleasant person...in addition to being a diagusting p*g, pervert, sociopath who LOVED to torture/kill animals, and a demonic and blasphemous voice!
Maybe his real name was Luthifer 😂
👍
LOL priceless!!
Where are the other TWO comments??????
That’s certainly what Mike Tython would call him.
Msgr. Patrick F. O'Hare, LLD author of Luther, The Facts About, went light on how evil this person really was. Of course, he wrote the facts about him and spared us the really dark side of him. Today, especially Protestants, need to know just how evil the man was. Back in his time, the lukewarm Catholics followed him while the devout held on to the faith. Archbishop Lefebvre is the devout Saint of our time. Praying for his canonization.
Unfortunately the Protestants I know are ex Catholics 😢
I'm ex Protestant turned Catholic! But I know many protestants that have left the church as well.
I'm ex-pentacostal to catholic that converted upon hearing the protestant Bible got altered with books taken out/ whole verses changed/ as well as mistranslations.
Then I thought if the Bible was the sole authority on Christian life, why did they have to do any of that?
I had no idea what a nut Luther was.
Neither do the Lutherans! Lol
@@Christislord5 😂😂😂
I'm 99% sure I saw you Kennedy at mass on the Feast of Christ the King
if you were at St. Michaels in Atlanta you definitely saw him
July 31, 1517
Six hours in the confessional means Luther was nuts
@@dare2554 Yep. Wonder what brought him south of the Canadian border 🤷
@@jimmy_woods4337 He was in Atlanta as one of the speakers for a Catholic conference with Dr. Taylor Marshall.
Wow, is this for real!.
Fr. Hesse did a talk about Luther.
He just sounds like someone who didn't want to stop sinning or couldn't stop sinning so he just made a bunch of stuff up.
That's what it sounds like to me.
Yuppers!
I thought it sounded like repackaged Gnosticism
Ah ah ah... you can't beat "salvation is by grace through faith in the atoning work of Jesus Christ. Half of Christianity bowed down to this, and even the RCC had to reform to a more Apostolic position.
Poor Protestant who believe Martin Luther. Maybe they are Not aware of this shocking theory of Luther.😮
I’m glad I’m not being tested on this
All he did was divide the church into many Protestant churches .
Satan was since the very beginning of Christ and it will be till the end of the world I am proud of being a Catholic
Kennedy - you got Our Lady of Fatima from 1917 mixed up with Fr Martin Luther's posting the 95 theses which was 1517.
Luther's God sounds more like the false god of Islam.
Luther thought that when he was to celebrate the Consecration of the Holy Eucharist as a Catholic Priest, he was 'making' Jesus' body and blood rather than the bread and wine being changed into Our Lord's body and blood.
'The Facts about Luther' written by Monsignor Patrick. F O'Hare L.L.D is also excellent.
Aren't we hearing the same from liberation theory?
If Martin Luther could see what he caused he would repent in a heart beat
Wow, Luther would have been a dedicated follower of the mustached Furhrer. He was truly demon possessed.
More like Adolf was a fan of Luther and Mohammad
That web design is straight out of Geocities, though. 😅
Luther's comments shock me, partly because Lutheran theology is the only Protestant theology I'm familiar with. Mr. Hall quotes accurately, I'm sure. But Luther's false beliefs tell me mostly about his character flaws and reveal too little about what 21st-century Lutherans believe. When I talked with a Lutheran friend of mine about some things Luther believed, my friend replied that Lutheran's disagree with Luther on some points.
This video reminds me of where we discovered many of Charles Darwin's many character defects. But you already know that they don't falsify his theory of evolution any more than my faults disprove what I know about my fields, philosophy and computer science.
Mr. Hall is welcome to tell us about what Luther, Darwin, or other people believed. On the other hand, it's fallacious to conclude that someone's vices disprove some theory he taught or some doctrine he believed. Luther's imperfections may have helped him draw some conclusions he drew. But I commit the genetic fallacy by saying that a belief's truth or its falsehood depends on what got me to hold that belief.
If I say, "Don't believe Lutheran doctrine, since Luther was an evil man," that's an example of the ad hominem fallacy. It's a way to attack someone instead criticizing what he believes. "Ad hominem" means "against the man."
There's a major problem with Luther's moral theology. For anyone to be guilty, he must have free will. People have it, but animal don't. That's why no one would imprison an angry dog for mauling an infant.
A sinful mindset and lifestyle is most definitely going to affect a person’s relationship with God and thus his beliefs which influence his teachings.
The spiritual life and the salvation of millions of souls is not as trivial as philosophy or computer science.
The guy literally teaches people to “go forth and sin boldly” and to reject reason and conscience.
We are not talking about mere character flaws but rather indications of internal evil and , like any cult leader, his followers should be made aware.
If you follow him, you are in danger of becoming like him.
@@Sarah-bug I agree with you. But I hesitate to say philosophy is trivial. Naturally, someone's everlasting salvation matters much, much more than anyone's philosophical theories. Still, about 62 Popes have recommended St. Thomas Aquinas's philosophy and his theology.
You know what "transubstantiation" means, I'm sure. But some people may not know that "substance" and "accident" are Aristoelian-Thomistic jargon. "substance" means essence. An accident is property a person, a place, or a thing can gain or lose and still survive.
"Substance" can also mean "an object that has accidents." Being-read, being-bald, being-soft, and being-hard are accidents.
Luther was a heretic like every other Protestant revolutionary. I wasn't recommending Protestantism. I merely told everyone that someone can be vicious, even if he did or wrote many great things. Lord Bertrand Bussell was a brilliant philosopher and a great mathematician. Who would warn me not to read, say, Russell's book "An Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy," since he cheated on his wife and bragged about that in his autobiography?
Maybe you're familiar with the late Protestant apologist Ravi Zacharias. Though I'm a traditionalist Catholic, I loved many of his lectures. Sadly, soon before his death, his "ministry" discovered that he raped a woman. That was terrible. And I can still hardly believe he hid his perversion for years. But his "dark side," never appeared onstage.
www.christianitytoday.com/news/2021/february/ravi-zacharias-rzim-investigation-sexual-abuse-sexting-rape.html
I'm not condoning evil. My point is that even bad people can good, even admirable things.
Here's some information about Lord Russell, whom I admire for his work, not for his character.
philosophynews.com/what-can-be-learned-from-bertrand-russells-life-as-a-philanderer-part-ii/
Kennedy you are so funny.
I should say I love your sence of humor.
Sounds very Manichaean.
There’s no such right as religious freedom.
Just liked the video and I'm like # triple 6... if that is not sign to me that this man had the evil one in him, not sure what is..
He reminds me of Fr sodemite James
This could be written by Francis of Rome
Please don’t call him that. His name is Jorge the Jesuit.
Francis was my confirmation name, and Jorge doesn’t deserve to be known by the same name as a man so close to Christ the King that he received His Wounds.
Not that I do, i don’t think so highly of myself as to make that kind of statement, but I was so moved by Francis’ story that I chose that name as my confirmation name in hopes and aspirations that I may live a Goodly and God-Fearing life in the manner in which he did.
Martin Luther died at 3:00 AM according to his chronicler who was with him at the time
Are these the actual teachings / doctrines of the Lutheran Church or is an overview of the writings of Martin Luther with the intent to attack the legitimacy of their Church?
Both
@emmap1159 well. I've got no nickel in this, but the fact a decent number of sites assert there is plagiarism in this document and no references were cited in this video of what the Lutheran churches actuality teach in the present, I would call it suspect. But if it validates your beliefs, you do you.
@@363catman My only expertise on the subject is regular online debates with protestant followers and their beliefs that align pretty faithfully to what we hear Luther say in these writings: that we are all sinners, not worthy ever of salvation so our works don't matter, that the last supper was that..just a supper despite Jesus's insistence in John 6:53, that the bible is the direct word of God but which they have no problem revising with every new edition, that Mary and the saints are idols and dead as sinners like the rest of us, and that the Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon. Pretty much word for word what we just heard. They are splintered into 40,000 denominations which begs the question: are Lutherans the only ones going to heaven? Because they can't all be correct.
@@emmap1159 we are still living with the hatred created by both sides from the reformation. Remember in the pre-1776 world dissenting from the state religion was looked at in the same light as treason. I know a lot of folks around here take huge exception with the concept of ecumenism, but when an honest discussion is had we agree on more than most assume. And after 450 years of mutual hatred, trying a different approach seems pretty reasonable in my mind.
@@363catmanWell, if you watch many Catholic videos as I do, start scrolling through the comments because we're bombarded regularly by vitriolic criticism of our faith from every one of our reformist sectarian brethren, pretty hateful stuff actually. They are duty bound to save us apparently through slander. This series on Luther is needed because up till now, we had no idea what we were dealing with or what the impetus was for the constant badgering. One person told me that his church teaches that unless they get in our face and Evangelize, that their salvation wasn't genuine. So then you defend your faith using weaponized scripture as they do, and that really enrages them.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Calvin - Cauvin - Cauuin - Cohen? A study on "Who was John Calvin"?
Points of interest: Disecting the surname study correctly
1) The official name of John "Calvin" according to French cathedral registries is CAUUIN. That is "Cau - uin"
2) The second "U" was originally a French "V". This "v" can either be a vowel or consonant. If the "V" precedes a vowel it becomes a consonant. Therefore it is pronounced "Cauvin" in French.
3) However, it is well documented that "Cauvin" Anglicized his name taking it into the English language where the second "U" is NOT read as a "V" but retains the "U" sound - Cauuin.
4) In the English name transition, the last three letters are therefore read as "uin" and pronounced as - - "whin" (short "i") due to the "au" diphthong preceding it being "whiffled out" as seen in the 1611 dictionary.
5) The diphthong "AU". This is pronounced in the old French as "O" as in "foe".
6) Therefore, in the Anglicized form the name Cauuin is correctly pronounced
C -oh - whin (short "i") exactly as the English "Cohen"
7) The "L" in the name was from Cauuin's adaption of the Latin name he used in his university days, that of "Calvin", by which name he also became known in English as well as Cauuin. See the 1611 French/English dictionary for the consonant "L" in the middle of a word as being a silent "L", thus the archaic "Calvin" is still most properly "Cauuin" in both English and French. (dictionary link next column at bottom)
References: John Calvin was not born "Calvin".
id3417.securedata.net/solarsabbath/calvin.htm
Luther sounds insane! To sin more in order to silence the conscience sounds like the advice of a mentally ill person. Did anyone ever actually read this who joined the reform? If they did sounds like they loved sin more than Christ.
Like a hundred years after him there was a guy just like him in Judaism named Sabbatai Zevi, who did massive damage to Jews too. Crazy how religions get hurt most from people within our own religions.
@@Thor-Orion well Martin Luther didnt damage the church he lead people away only. The only one true religion is unwavering because God does not change.
22:51 to be fair do you think thatt a tad out of context & the heretic Luther meant “he looks on God as no more than a scoundrel “ to mean Luther himself is the scoundrel & looks to God for mercy ? Not trying to defend the man but I just can’t imagine ever calling GOD the literal King of the Universe a “scoundrel “ unless like you said Kennedy ,
ML is possessed by Satan .
However much I tried to believe in Catholicism, I find the book of Jonah to be *NOT* believable. As metaphor yes but literal, nope & no. Catholicism needs to back away from literalism. Catholicism shouldn't follow in the footsteps of fundamentalism bc that's *NOT* what the religion is about. It is about createing better people
I can't listen to this guy...he is constantly swallowing. Drives me nuts.
Googling some of these quotes they seem to be horribly taken out of context. I'd love to bash Martin Luther's teachings, but this is more like bashing Saint Augustine for saying "Lord, make me chaste, but not yet".
Luther said Jesus was an adulterer.
Saint Augustine was tempted but resisted for the sake of the cross. Luther gave into temptation but claimed salvation because of the cross. Which one stands a chance of being right?
Luther is greatest religious genius ever lived! He saved whole Christianity. Catholic Church was corrupted by Satan from start. 👍✝️😎
Yes Luther following satan was soooooo genius! 😂😂😂😂😂
Edited to include name: @subrosa7708.
We have a winner! Someone who (may or may not have) listened to factual reason and rejects it as being of Satan. You ignored every single declaration written by your savior, Luther. Listen to the podcast again, troll. God grant you a saturation of grace. May you be blessed every day for the rest of your life. And stop this idiocy of serving a mere fallen angel. Serve Christ Jesus who died for you.
Did you not hear the part where he called for the poor to be murdered or do you just not care?
Very funny! Good one.
Guys he’s trolling you!
Respectfully may I say your statements are based on biased pre-Vatican 2 Catholic apologetics. Modern RCC scholars including recent Popes have spoken well of Martin Luther. There is a statue of Martin Luther at the Vatican and Pope Francis has cordial dialogues with the Lutherans....but not with the Confessional Lutherans who are not lqbtxyz (Missouri Synod USA, ELDONA Synod in Europe).
And that is wrong. Once a heretic always a heretic. They didnt repent of heresy so they remain heretics. No matter what the pope says. They remain heretics.
You speak of the current apostate Pope...lol😅
Modern RCC scholars are suspect, along with much of the post VII baggage. Luther was a heretic, and no apologetics from Bogus Ordo Catholics, a heretical Pope, or erroneous scholarship will diminish, nor eradicate this truth. Both St.Theresa of Avila and St.Padre Pio, stated that Luther for kindling rebellion against Holy Mother Church, is reaping his just eternal reward. There's is nothing to convince me to disbelieve this.
A lot of the quotations are from the drunken ramblings of Luther's "Table Talk", but Lutherans take them seriously.
That’s because only pre-Vatican 2 sources are trustworthy. It’s a mix of error and truth since then so when in doubt, trust the Fathers!