The Failure of the First Protestant Missionaries
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 вер 2021
- It’s usually said that Protestant and evangelical Christians made very little missionary effort in the 16th-18th centuries. In fact, there was much more than we remember. But they used strategies that look very alien to modern eyes: whether trying to spread ‘civilisation’ as a prerequisite for conversion, or seeing these efforts as part of a global apocalyptic conflict.
This lecture will introduce this series about these early missionary projects; why they mostly failed; and why they still matter.
A lecture by Alec Ryrie
The transcript and downloadable versions of the lecture are available from the Gresham College website:
www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-an...
Gresham College has offered free public lectures for over 400 years, thanks to the generosity of our supporters. There are currently over 2,500 lectures free to access. We believe that everyone should have the opportunity to learn from some of the greatest minds. To support Gresham's mission, please consider making a donation: gresham.ac.uk/support/
Website: gresham.ac.uk
Twitter: / greshamcollege
Facebook: / greshamcollege
Instagram: / greshamcollege
WOOHOO! He’s back!!
Best Gresham lecturer bar none.
Best voice EU
I can never not watch professor ryrie...and I say that as a complete atheist. He is just an amazing narrator of the history of the protestant faith.
As I commented once earlier:
_"Came for atheism. Stayed for Professor Ryrie."_
@@donatodiniccolodibettobardi842 I'm snagging his book Unbelievers from my local library. Just put it and one other of his books on hold! ✓✓✓
Protestantism is not a faith but an internal degeneration towards atheism and secularism
Within moments of Mr Ryrie speaking my attention is totally engrossed and so it remains till he concludes . Thanks again .
You described it perfectly. I feel the same way! ❤️🔥❤️
I will always be happy to see talks by this guy.
I'm a simple man: I see an Alec Ryrie video, I click on it.
I see you are a man of culture as well.
Brilliant lecturer! As a sometime-university lecturer, I get too much pleasure out of these presentations to be as envious as I probably should. ;)
The best of history, trying to understand how profoundly different things were!
He's back!
Yay! We're back in school with Professor Alec! :-)
Terrific. Keep them coming!
At my Catholic boys' grammar school in Manchester, I benefitted from the history lessons of Fr. 'Slim' Kerrigan, who chain-smoked his way through the syllabus in an eternal Ulster monotone. The only occasion on which this monotone varied, and that explosively, was when an unfortunate fellow scholar pronounced the word "protestant" phonetically. 'Slim' explained to the hapless boy that the first "t" was to to be pronounced as a "d", and "woe betide" any boy who committed this grave error in future.
The same teacher, on another occasion, asked the class why Virginia was named after Queen Elizabeth I. Horrified at the prospect of giving voice to what we all felt sure must be the answer, there was a long, excruciating silence. Eventually, 'Slim' broke the silence: "Ye fools! The woman was not married!".
Why on earth would he insist on it being pronounced with a D? Is it part of the local dialect, or something?
Bought his ‘Protestants’ book just last week.
I like prof. Ryrie's presentation. He speaks clearly and with a logical progression, and uses elaborate yet understandable language.
I love these videos.
New ryrie just dropped!
A brilliant lecture by a brilliant lecturer.
It would be great to do a "history of muslim missions" series.
Thanks for the interesting lecture. About 40 years ago I met a very old Batak man who described his recollection of the tribe's first contact with a Dutch missionary Fr Yohanne, they ate him.
The best thing they could have done
8:13 The Puritans didn't try and convert the natives?
9:11 TBF, those early Dutch, Danish, etc colonies were big on *TRADE.*
52:56 Interesting question and response.
"...of one sort or another," a phrase which includes non-Christians and ex-Christians as two, perhaps the largest two, varieties of Christian.
I think they try not to fall into that trap. The definition they use is simply people who choose to describe themselves as Christians - religious self-ID. So western 'nones' shouldn't be included. That still leaves you with everyone from Ethiopian Orthodox to Jehovah's Witnesses, which is enough variety to be going on with.
31:30. Well said. I may laugh for a few hours.
Mistake at the beginning of the lecture. Christianity spread just as much east as west before Islam, probably being dominant in large sections of the silk road and the largest minority in the Persian empire.
But not for long.
26:15 why ...
Armenia was the first Christian Nation and constantly requested aid from the other Christian nations which they never received.
Part of that unfortunately was because the Armenians subscribed to miaphysitism.
We know from research the Vikings crossed the Atlantic before Columbus.
ACME researchs
And they brought Odin to the Natives.
@@Mrch33ky many of them were Christian by this time. Erik the Red was.
Christians of one franchise or other. 🤥
The premise for religion is always one and the same it is used as a weapon.
Like Marxists don't use documented bad behavior within religion as a weapon, themselves, and science, too? Atheists and Marxists are beyond arrogant, so who are they to judge?
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!