DJI Drone Ban Signed into Law! Should Recreational Pilots be Worried?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 гру 2023
  • It's official. Effective in 2 years, there will be no more DJI drones used at the federal level. Could this ban extend to consumers?
    ❤️ All of the gear and tech I use and love: amzn.to/3adaWsn
    🏆Thankful for my videos and research? Want more? Then consider joining this channel to get access to perks and exclusive content for as little as $1.99/month:
    / @51drones
    Watch Billy Kyle interview Adam Welsh: • Discussing DJI’s Futur...
    🐐BEST ROYALTY FREE MUSIC!!! Free 30-day trial of Epidemic Sound: share.epidemicsound.com/BLNwJ (If you use this music for your content, you never have to worry about losing money for your hard-earned efforts.)
    🐐The easiest and best way to pass your Part 107 exam to be able to make money with your drone: dronepilotgroundschool.com/?a...
    (This is what I used to study for my Part 107 Commercial UAV certificate, and it totally helped me! Money back guarantee if you don't pass, plus they pay your test fee!)
    👀The best drone on the market right now for everyday users and prosumers: click.dji.com/AEbhHMT0DOPUxLJ...
    💥or get it here: amzn.to/46LcSzH
    With 10-bit DLog-M, you need the best MicroSD card: amzn.to/3Pozb7i
    _______________________________________________________________________
    The Top 3 Drones I Recommend for Beginner Drone Enthusiasts:
    * 💥DJI Mini 4 Pro: click.dji.com/AEbhHMT0DOPUxLJ...
    * 💯DJI Mavic 3 Classic: amzn.to/3IgCewo
    * ❤️DJI Air 2S: amzn.to/3ExpJqT (Absolute best for the money right now)
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________
    🔥EQUIPMENT USED TO MAKE THIS VIDEO:
    Camera:amzn.to/3je86Eh
    Camera 2: amzn.to/3v3hAYq
    Favorite SD Card: amzn.to/3FQ9ObA
    Wireless Microphone: amzn.to/3jfCrSY
    Studio Microphone: amzn.to/3r8jHsM
    Action Camera: amzn.to/3JmScSC
    Action Camera 2: amzn.to/36Uww3i
    Equipment Bag: amzn.to/3LJ7mDm
    Primary Drone: amzn.to/3UpGsEO
    Second Drone: amzn.to/3uhDdVV
    Lighting 1: amzn.to/3KjKl9P
    Lighting 2: amzn.to/3ufhldK
    Lighting 3:amzn.to/3DQ04uJ
    Lighting 4: amzn.to/38nYFzQ
    Lighting 5: amzn.to/3JgA2SE
    Budget Fill Lights: amzn.to/3Jg0zzl
    Follow me for bonus content:
    Instagram: 51drones
    X (formerly Twitter): www.x.com/51drones
    TikTok: / 51drones
    #dji #banned #unitedstates
    51 Drones is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @51Drones
    @51Drones  4 місяці тому +1

    ❤️ All of the gear and tech I use and love (RECENTLY UPDATED!!!!): amzn.to/3adaWsn

  • @xjet
    @xjet 6 місяців тому +428

    Someone should pass a law that prohibits the passing of laws based on ignorance, hysteria, deception or hyperbole 🙂

    • @olewiseone1079
      @olewiseone1079 6 місяців тому +22

      Then we would have no new laws. I’m in total agreement with that.

    • @51Drones
      @51Drones  6 місяців тому +13

      If only!

    • @robertdodson1823
      @robertdodson1823 6 місяців тому +9

      It's called the ballot:)

    • @mikeb3311
      @mikeb3311 6 місяців тому +18

      Then there would be zero gun control laws…so i agree with you

    • @skratz
      @skratz 6 місяців тому

      @@robertdodson1823 Unfortunately, the same idiots in Congress voting for stuff like this (both sides of the aisle) like buying votes from uneducated voters.

  • @LeviShaffer
    @LeviShaffer 6 місяців тому +114

    I am a school teacher using DJI drones teaching students about drones and preparing them to take Part 107. This is frustrating to hear.

    • @longshot7590
      @longshot7590 6 місяців тому +2

      Too bad comrade!

    • @huevitopipihead
      @huevitopipihead 6 місяців тому

      It's DJI the only brand out there?

    • @donherbert1561
      @donherbert1561 6 місяців тому +9

      Public school teachers aren’t affected by this, unless you purchased the drones with a federal grant. Otherwise, schools are funded by either state or local tax dollars, so no reason to worry.

    • @Smt_Glaive
      @Smt_Glaive 6 місяців тому +5

      Just order a bunch of flight controllers, esc , brushless motors and gps modules from china. Sorted!
      Teach the kids to design their own frames. Itll add to the learning excitement!

    • @hernandez-perezandroid5983
      @hernandez-perezandroid5983 6 місяців тому +4

      @@huevitopipihead there are NO consumer drones not a single one band that is made 100% in USA. all are made in China and even Skydio has MADE IN CHINA Batteries and other parts.

  • @zemnickphoto
    @zemnickphoto 6 місяців тому +62

    It's all about power, greed and control. Politicians getting their $$$$ from Skydio?

  • @timeonthewaterca
    @timeonthewaterca 6 місяців тому +152

    This is ridiculous. There is nothing on the market close to DJI products. Someone's pockets are getting filled.

    • @Bikerbug2020
      @Bikerbug2020 6 місяців тому

      Nope, they didn’t pay the Biden Family enough to stop the legislation…

    • @snoopyloopy
      @snoopyloopy 6 місяців тому

      Given that Sen. Scott was mentioned, it's probably his pockets, especially since he has a known history of exactly that.

    • @AJDIAS-ov1zd
      @AJDIAS-ov1zd 6 місяців тому +11

      Yeah, Democrat politicians.

    • @Pilotin74
      @Pilotin74 6 місяців тому +27

      @@AJDIAS-ov1zd 👈🏼 You are way off base buddy. The architect of this bill is Republican Rick Scott of Florida. Get your facts straight before you demonstrate your ignorance. Pitiful just pitiful‼️

    • @henryreinders3031
      @henryreinders3031 6 місяців тому +8

      Agree, there is no other brand I would buy.

  • @brkfst4dnr
    @brkfst4dnr 6 місяців тому +38

    This is not the win that they think it is. I've worked in government and military contracting, there are already policies in place that forbid the use of Chinese materials in military equipment. By banning the use from all agencies that receive federal funding, all you've done is force the small town fire department to buy from the (now) only game in town, at whatever price that Skylandio decides to set. Also, now the fireman flying it isn't flying the DJI he probably has the same model of at home too, but I bet the FD can buy a training package for a tidy sum... this is an obvious lobbying cash grab disguised under pearl clutching.

    • @ZinnNasty
      @ZinnNasty 2 місяці тому +1

      I know of a handful of companies that could be able to get off the ground and compete in this market but can't currently because of the Chinese subsidized drone. It's time we spur American innovation again instead of just relying on Chinese stuff.

    • @ChadSteele_Video
      @ChadSteele_Video 2 місяці тому +1

      Follow the corruption, those that propose the law are the corrupt ones.

    • @brkfst4dnr
      @brkfst4dnr 2 місяці тому +1

      @@ZinnNasty So just forget the free market then and let the government decide who can sell and who can't?

    • @ZinnNasty
      @ZinnNasty 2 місяці тому

      @@brkfst4dnr That's the problem, the free market isn't deciding. The Chinese Government subsidies this market for DJI and others. We aren't playing on the same level field. Our Government either needs to ban their drones our throw subsidies at American companies so they can compete on price. Instead of just buying more cheap crap from china!

  • @kiwitexan4477
    @kiwitexan4477 6 місяців тому +63

    As a fireman who uses a DJI drone as part of my job, this is extremely frustrating. Once again the government is showing they only care about one thing... lining their own pockets... 😢

    • @soundtecked
      @soundtecked 4 місяці тому

      Yep and there doing a tiktok ban to to kill free speech

    • @ZinnNasty
      @ZinnNasty 2 місяці тому

      That's not at all what their doing, by doing this it will spur American innovation and it needs to be done!

  • @grampafpv
    @grampafpv 6 місяців тому +18

    Apparently this bill only requires a waiver for a department to use the equipment. The only purpose this bill serves is to try and prop up companies that can't compete with DJI.

    • @SLHJR0390
      @SLHJR0390 4 місяці тому

      They won’t be granting waivers more than likely. Why make a carve out

    • @grampafpv
      @grampafpv 4 місяці тому

      @@SLHJR0390 they already do for law enforcement and fire rescue.

  • @richardharms4689
    @richardharms4689 6 місяців тому +31

    Thanks for keeping us updated on these issues, I really appreciate your efforts!

  • @fen2453
    @fen2453 6 місяців тому +61

    DJI drones have been banned for GOV use for years. It was also in the last NDAA. The only change for 2024 is it applies to all federal employees instead of just DOD and affiliates. There is also an exception policy which is very easy to get approved and just requires a software update.

    • @jidnglo
      @jidnglo 6 місяців тому +1

      Where can we learn more about this?

    • @fen2453
      @fen2453 6 місяців тому

      @@jidnglo read the NDAA. It's always posted on the congress.gov website. I believe it's section 848 that covers DJI and foreign electronic cyber vulnerability.

    • @seanpeavideo
      @seanpeavideo 6 місяців тому +3

      Please elaborate a bit. This seems video seems like a bit of hyperbole. fun versus national security?

    • @edsullivan6884
      @edsullivan6884 6 місяців тому

      This is not a problem with Security it's money flow to any foreign country by the Federal gov.@@seanpeavideo

    • @edsullivan6884
      @edsullivan6884 6 місяців тому

      @@jidnglo On line regarding Federal contracting and buying.

  • @andrewdrone
    @andrewdrone 6 місяців тому +66

    We really need a new generation in Washington that understands even the basics of how computers work. How exactly is DJI more of a problem than garbage like Temu and TikTok? Things that actually are extracting data? If we're that scared of DJI because we don't want to understand drones, the government could, I don't know, just learn what Airplane Mode does?

    • @51Drones
      @51Drones  6 місяців тому +6

      Yep

    • @kurtzFPV
      @kurtzFPV 6 місяців тому

      Seeing as Rick Scott made his fortune swindling medicare, I'm guessing he owns stock in an inferior US drone company and is manuvering to set them up with a government contract when DJI is outlawed.

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 6 місяців тому +5

      This is not about your use, it's about federal gov't use. Consider a DJI drone being used by the FBI to help in counter intelligence surveillance against Chinese nationals here in the US. Imagine the Chinese gov't or military seeing what the FBI drone is seeing and getting the geo location telemetry in real time. Suppose you put it into airplane mode (assume you actually mean local data mode) and for some coincidence, it doesn't work as advertised in certain circumstances. Would not be that hard to do. Probably don't have anything that obvious in the drone software today, but it could have already been created, just waiting to be downloaded with the next firmware update whenever desired. Again, let's not be naive about audits having been performed. Those are a snapshot in time, says nothing about the state of affairs after the next update.

    • @kurtzFPV
      @kurtzFPV 6 місяців тому +8

      @@RebelByNature no DJI drone is being used in that capacity. The US government as its own highly sophisticated drones for that. And on the slight chance that one is, the agency has totally hacked it and is running it with their own firmware.

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 6 місяців тому +1

      @@kurtzFPV Interesting, not sure how you know that, but hope you are correct. Would certainly like that to be the case. I guess I would like to know what capacity the federal government is using DJI drones (with dji software) for in the first place. If it's only for monitoring animal movements in Yellowstone etc, then maybe I take it all back.

  • @webingerphoto49
    @webingerphoto49 6 місяців тому +10

    Russ…Bravo for stepping up again on drones (again) ie. Senator Scott! EMS/Police/ First Responders a must to have. I am in the Smoky Mountains of NC and personally know a certified airplane pilot and photographer/videographer who got his license years ago to fly his drones for real estate images! Now he is called by local police and government (Haywood County) to search for lost hikers and Interstate auto accidents. With infrared attachments he can see at night for hikers or criminals on the run! I have been following your videos for years now…thank you for clearing up or mentioning all of the untruths about “Legal” flying with regular drones and mini drones (245 grams). Happy New Year!!! Keep on Flyin’!

  • @1EyeInTheSky
    @1EyeInTheSky 6 місяців тому +141

    Alexa spies on us way more than our DJI drone does. Although if these local, state and federal agencies cant use or purchase DJI it doesn't stop those entities from hiring 3rd party private pilots from using DJI equipment. Unless that is buried somewhere in the bill. Or best guess is that the local and state agencies will figure out some way to skirt around the ban and just use them anyway. Its going to be interesting thats for sure.

    • @TheDevnul
      @TheDevnul 6 місяців тому +7

      Yea, but they can easily get warrants for that data. My guess is that they are having issues getting cooperation from the Chinese government.

    • @AlanzFPV
      @AlanzFPV 6 місяців тому +4

      I think it is buried in the bill but haven’t read it for myself. I did a paid gig recently for a government agency and had to fill out a questionnaire. There were already questions on it related to use of Chinese drones. My assumption is they are not allowed to knowingly allow federal funds to be used to pay for services which include them.

    • @1EyeInTheSky
      @1EyeInTheSky 6 місяців тому +2

      @@AlanzFPV if these agencies already have these drones, and have already been using them for a particular period of time, I wonder if it precludes them from using them in the future? I’ll be honest I haven’t read the bill because let’s face it those things are written in a different language and are too long. I guess my question is with this bill any agency that takes federal money can’t purchase and use Chinese drones from this point forward or is it retroactive to cover anything that’s already been purchased and currently in use? I would really be interested to know that part.

    • @brianroberge4226
      @brianroberge4226 6 місяців тому

      Yes, but Amazon hasn't been preparing for war with the US for years; like China is.

    • @kbrown8898
      @kbrown8898 6 місяців тому +1

      If you have a government contract to supply services, you fall under the same rules and regs as government entities. That’s why working on government contracts is very complicated and costly.

  • @TheRailfanDan
    @TheRailfanDan 6 місяців тому +6

    Really glad you keep us up to date with this type of information Russ. Thank you for doing the research and making it easy for us to know what's going on! It is indeed a shame this is going into effect.

  • @RonaldBrown59
    @RonaldBrown59 6 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for keeping us updated on the latest information, concerning the ban on DJI drones. I hope they gets things sorted out on this matter. Great video Russ, thanks for sharing. Happy New Year.

  • @jamesabell7587
    @jamesabell7587 6 місяців тому +33

    This is a sad reality. I as a military veteran understand that the government needs to be cautions about security and privacy. That being said, as a M.S. in unmanned systems, this is overkill. DJI's systems are highly respected and reliable systems that have a lot of capabilities. We as pilots, users and people who may benefit from these aircraft need to speak out against those who would pass this legislation. Hopefully DJI can provide ways to stop this threat to our livelihoods.

    • @mjones82
      @mjones82 6 місяців тому +2

      100% Correct

    • @matthew3136
      @matthew3136 6 місяців тому +1

      Next up will be SpaceX and Starlink.

    • @deezeed2817
      @deezeed2817 6 місяців тому

      Nothing can be done, The U.S is a paranoid empire willing to do anything to maintain its hegemony. Put yourself in the mind of your overlords. Of course you won't want a "competitor". It's all about "rules based order" and you'd do anything to stop this new power from rising. You don't understand your political system. It is self defeating and only serves the interests of capital. This is why the world everyday is being dragged closer and closer to WW3.

  • @einstiensrocks
    @einstiensrocks 6 місяців тому +11

    The reason SkyDio lobby money is more effective is because they can contribute where it really matters to the politicians, directly into their reelection campaign accounts, whereas DJI being a Chinese company cannot. Unless they break off a separate company headquartered in the US, they will never be allowed to even compete in the government sector again.

    • @AR7271
      @AR7271 6 місяців тому

      SkyDio are lucky I don't live near San Mateo. Otherwise, I'd be paying them a visit and asking their employees a few questions in their parking lot. Tom Green style!

    • @ChadSteele_Video
      @ChadSteele_Video 2 місяці тому +1

      Skydio paid lobbyist's $560,000 in 2021 and $320,000 in 2022,

  • @adamtheminecrafter7877
    @adamtheminecrafter7877 6 місяців тому +23

    This sucks! I hope that we can still use them at normal levels, like for fun!

    • @dave20thmay
      @dave20thmay 6 місяців тому +3

      How they going to police that?

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 6 місяців тому

      you do realize this is only a ban on government use, right? Does not affect private use.

    • @adamtheminecrafter7877
      @adamtheminecrafter7877 6 місяців тому +2

      Yea I understand, just saying tho@@RebelByNature

    • @felixruiz2838
      @felixruiz2838 6 місяців тому +1

      Yet !!

    • @vader.editz.86
      @vader.editz.86 6 місяців тому

      @@RebelByNatureSo I should be fine about flying mine for car shows?

  • @SteveFlanigan
    @SteveFlanigan 6 місяців тому +19

    Fine. All DJI drone owners, such as myself, will just switch over to flying Unmanned Surveillance Balloons manufactured in China. It seems our current Federal Administration doesn't seem to have any issue with these.

  • @DroneovrCB
    @DroneovrCB 6 місяців тому

    Hi Russ, Thanks for posting this video and keeping us up to date.

  • @jimnorth9902
    @jimnorth9902 6 місяців тому +51

    It is refreshing to hear these topics discussed by someone who first takes the time to research the facts. Your channel, as well as Greg Reverdiau's Pilot Institute are my trusted sources for UAS information. I also appreciate that you are always upfront about when you are offering your personal opinion on a topic. Thank you, Russ! I hope the new year is a happy and healthy one for you and your family!

  • @Piratepoilet
    @Piratepoilet 6 місяців тому +5

    I have just got a DJI Mini 4 pro drone and it's a great wee thing to get out and about for a bit of a look see around the old neighbourhood. I can even get it as far as the beach have a fly around and still have power to get back home. So far no problems, I'm loving it 🏴‍☠️🚁

  • @AlpenDrone
    @AlpenDrone 6 місяців тому

    Happy New Year & MANY Happy Returns Russ 🎉

  • @jonalvarez5698
    @jonalvarez5698 6 місяців тому

    Thank you Russ for the information! It is one of the main reasons I subscribed to the channel days ago. I’ve watched many videos from your channel for the in’s and out’s of recreational flying as I just became a drone owner this past Xmas. It’s sad to hear this signing of a ban, yet I really don’t believe the recreational use or consumer use of Chinese drones would be nationally banned. Most drone users seem to want to capture moments of their experience and not private activity. I agree Russ, DJI should set base here in the US like other Chinese manufacturers do to mass produce their products here. I look forward to your next videos.

  • @bikedad57
    @bikedad57 6 місяців тому +5

    Thank you for the discussion on this topic, Russ. I think there is a good point to be made that there are many other ways for non’friendly govt’s to collect data. This reminds me of the attempted ban on TikTok. As a 107 pilot, I guess it will be necessary to ask any potential clients if they receive any federal funds. Think agriculture, infrastructure construction companies, state governments, etc. There are so many industries that receive some sort of federal aid, directly or indirectly. How are we to navigate this?!

    • @OpenCarryUSMC
      @OpenCarryUSMC 6 місяців тому +1

      Let the hiring entity worry about it.

    • @AR7271
      @AR7271 6 місяців тому

      @@OpenCarryUSMC exactly.

    • @bikedad57
      @bikedad57 6 місяців тому

      @@OpenCarryUSMC That is one way to do it. However, I prefer to be proactive and get all the business matters clear up front to avoid possible issues later.

  • @peterjb49
    @peterjb49 6 місяців тому +24

    I would be devastated if I could not fly my drone! BTW I am enjoying the Mini 3, except for the terrible weather here in NY.

    • @51Drones
      @51Drones  6 місяців тому +6

      Bad weather is only temporary, thankfully!

    • @bonezbag1
      @bonezbag1 6 місяців тому +2

      Where in NY do you fly?

    • @peterjb49
      @peterjb49 6 місяців тому +2

      Near Binghamton

    • @l2torres
      @l2torres 6 місяців тому +1

      Thats not ny thats UPSTATE ny

    • @peterjb49
      @peterjb49 6 місяців тому

      What's your point?@@l2torres

  • @paulthomas3302
    @paulthomas3302 6 місяців тому

    Thanks, Russ, Have a Fantastic New Year!
    Happy Flying

  • @murallod
    @murallod 6 місяців тому +4

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts Russ (hope things are ok these days) Could you share the link to the drone laws by state that you showed at 6:40 ? I was shopping for a new consumer drone but if I eventually want to fly commercially, I would like to invest in a drone that doesn’t limit my client base. I love DJI (the Mavic 2 Pro was a favorite of mine) but if I can find another company that matches the same quality, reliability, and usability then I am open to trying something else too.

  • @georgekelly1948
    @georgekelly1948 6 місяців тому +26

    The ban is not legitimate. I wrote to both of my U.S. senators and my U.S. representative about the wrong headed aspects of this legislation. I received uninformed responses. Such is the state of our elected officials.

    • @TheJoeyboots
      @TheJoeyboots 6 місяців тому +6

      I bet they all use AI for their responses. They are busy going to dinners and participating in everthing good in life except working for the public.

    • @DaveInNH
      @DaveInNH 6 місяців тому +5

      Skydio's cash speaks louder than you can, unfortunately.

    • @JuicySmullietFPV
      @JuicySmullietFPV 6 місяців тому +1

      I’m surprised you got a response.

    • @willia3r
      @willia3r 6 місяців тому +1

      I received no response from my U.S. Senator on this drone ban issue.

  • @michaeltrue
    @michaeltrue 6 місяців тому +5

    Thanks for the clarity here Russ. Wondering if local law enforcement could use contract drone services to bridge any gaps in the short term?

    • @stevetrummfilmproductions9835
      @stevetrummfilmproductions9835 6 місяців тому +2

      They’ve two years to source alternatives…relax!

    • @IvanSkyFlight
      @IvanSkyFlight 6 місяців тому

      The law Russ is discussing expressly says that state and local agencies can continue to use drones not purchased with federal money.

  • @jer48888
    @jer48888 5 місяців тому

    Thank you for posting this! I love this channel!

  • @jolebole-yt
    @jolebole-yt 6 місяців тому +1

    Your next video should be how to obtain drone kits and best way to build them. Thanks for keeping us updated 👍🏻

  • @mckenziefotoworks
    @mckenziefotoworks 6 місяців тому +7

    Another load of crap by our .gov.

  • @ThomasS17
    @ThomasS17 6 місяців тому +4

    DJI going open source is the last things that's going to happen. In the 3d printing world, the Chinese company Bambu Lab, which is founded by former DJI employees, joined the competition last year. Their products are pretty good and fairly polished, similar to DJI drones, but they are closed source (except the things they have to open source), and they do everything to keep it that way. And there is also concerns about data security, since you have to connect to and run everything through their servers if you want to use all the functions (there is a local-only mode, but with limited functionality).

  • @DRATproductions1
    @DRATproductions1 6 місяців тому +2

    I'm so glad you brought up the iPhone... I always wondered why that isn't affected! I fully understand the concern of the videos being transmitted "might" be used, but for us novice flyers... if they want to look at the footage of I am recording, go right ahead... I truly believe they can't be that Bord. Like you said rescue and detect lost people so much fast! And a lot of companies use them to look at problems where it is hard to remotely get to. So many great things DJI drones do!
    I always watch your videos, they need to get the "law makers" to talk to you... Problem solved! Thank you for ALL that you do!

  • @deepsouthinception
    @deepsouthinception 4 місяці тому

    Thank you for the clarity!

  • @droneviewgis6699
    @droneviewgis6699 6 місяців тому +3

    Russ, keep up the good work. Mapping and DJI Terra. Photos and videos of grandma''s vineyard is of no concern to anyone, but mapping projects processed on DJI servers will probably raise a few eyebrows.

  • @jamesm4603
    @jamesm4603 6 місяців тому +6

    My understanding of the bill also allows Homeland security to bypass the ban which is stupid if they are really worried about the Chinese government getting info from the drones!

    • @DaveInNH
      @DaveInNH 6 місяців тому +8

      If true, that tells you all you really need to know. The bill has nothi g to do with security. It's designed to ensure that American drone manufacturers can sell subpar products at hyper-inflated prices without any real competition.

    • @Pilotin74
      @Pilotin74 6 місяців тому +3

      @@DaveInNH- 👍🏼 Agree‼️

  • @robertdodson1823
    @robertdodson1823 6 місяців тому +1

    As part of that "ban" on drones, there really should be a waiver process included to allow exceptions for emergency services (search & rescue, etc) and others. As you mentioned these are critical services which could well be impacted by a total ban. They are also services which could easily create an air gap between drone activity and internet connections so as to make data transfers offshore impossible, making the need for the ban unnecessary in the first place. Glad you're taking the time to discuss this topic and bring challenges to the forefront and sorry someone has pushed legislation without considering the impact to certain critical services. Thanks Russ.

  • @leviconnelly79
    @leviconnelly79 6 місяців тому

    Great video! Thanks for sharing Russ.

  • @aa1shots
    @aa1shots 6 місяців тому +3

    And i feel like DJi has been so complaint especially that remote id software update that forces us to have the goggles 2 connected to a smartphone for flight. As ridiculous as that update was it was a requirement they had to meet. Hoping for the best i just got into this field as well.

  • @edwardceimk5544
    @edwardceimk5544 6 місяців тому +23

    Yet we have phones,cameras, computers from china. This is so dumb, if they ban my drones they can pay me back for them. So frustrating, I hope something is done and soon about this.

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      Pay you back from them? Are you a federal agency? Do yo not understand that this is not a ban for civilians to use and fly them> You will still be able to buy them, only federal agencies won't? You seem confused, just can't tell if it is genuine confusion or intentional.

    • @WestVirginiasBigred271
      @WestVirginiasBigred271 6 місяців тому +2

      @@joeg1992How much longer do you think civilians will have more freedom than Federal employees? This is just a start and civilians will be next. But great news Drugs are also illegal but still just happens to be available on any street corner near you 😂

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      @@WestVirginiasBigred271 Your response make no sense. On one hand you are saying this will somehow later apply to civilians, showing you have no understanding of this at all.
      But then you go on to show me how government ban don't mean things will really be banned, destroying you own argument.
      SO civilians will be next in the same way that they banned drugs? Got it. Go sleep off whatever you smoked.

  • @jhawkinsfl
    @jhawkinsfl 6 місяців тому +2

    Thank you Russ for keeping us informed on the latest drone news. In regards to recreational drones used for personal photography and videos, do you think that state and local officials view us as a danger to public safety? For example, I have had discussions with "drone haters" who argue that my interest in aerial videos is foolish and mindless and is too big a risk to be allowed in public. Even after explaining to them that I have a Part 107 drone license and know how to safely operate my drone, they still tell me I shouldn't be allowed to fly. I believe there are many people who have a fear of drones and want to change our laws to make it illegal for me to use my drone.

    • @robertdodson1823
      @robertdodson1823 6 місяців тому

      Quite true and a lot of this is nothing but politics where fear mongering is a often used tool. "drones" have been politicized like many other things and it becomes our job to educate the public of the good uses for drones including recreational flying and their use in many public services.

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 6 місяців тому

      There are always going to be Karens like that. Especially true when something new or relatively new, comes along like drones, or ebikes etc. Those people aren't going to go away. What matters is that numerically they are insufficient to have an effect on the laws. You can start by asking them how many people have been injured by drones. So there goes the safety issue. Honestly, state and local officials don't have the jurisdiction, so while it would be better if they were not hostile to us, there is not much they can do to you.

  • @robertfrieden
    @robertfrieden 6 місяців тому

    Thanks for this video. This is an important conversation

  • @VictorianAerialVision
    @VictorianAerialVision 6 місяців тому +8

    I really hope Australia doesn't go down the same path. While it wouldn't necessarilly affect me directly, it would have a lot of impact for people in the commercial drone work arena. Great video as always Russ! 🦘😎👍

  • @the1andonly
    @the1andonly 6 місяців тому +5

    In "The Country of the Brave and Free", something like that should not happen. Public security is a poor excuse for restricting the use of drones that have obvious benefits for the public when it comes to search and rescue efforts and so much more. DJI drones have a limited range and those law makers really don't understand what they do. This is ridiculous. fortunately I live in Canada, but we have a lot of Canadian lawmakers who are just as stupid as the ones in the US that wrote this law. I hope DJI wins in the end. They're not the Chinese Government.

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      They are not banning civilian use, only federal agencies, did you not watch the video?

    • @Jjpent
      @Jjpent 6 місяців тому +2

      @@joeg1992
      This is Just step 1. Just look at the guns owned by citizens, and the gradual government overreach there.

    • @the1andonly
      @the1andonly 6 місяців тому

      I did. Maybe you didn't though. The economic impact will be severe. It affects everyone who is getting federal funding of any form. There are a lot of "civilian" organizations who depend on that kind of funding. Stop asking stupid questions that are irrelevant to the video!@@joeg1992

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      @@Jjpent Are you new here? And by here I mean to the US. In my past 35 years of gun ownership it is easier and freer to own and carry guns that it has been. Pick a new strawman.
      They are not limiting the sales, use or import of these drones, they are limiting the use of them by federal agencies.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 місяці тому

      @@joeg1992 thats what they said about Huawei before they outright banned it.

  • @cwianecki
    @cwianecki 6 місяців тому +2

    This is sick, I live by the beach, over summer new york fire department was flying dji maverick over ocean beaches to look for sharks, this helped alert people to get out quickly from water when sharks were detected

  • @Prifly70
    @Prifly70 6 місяців тому +2

    Hey man, a drone landed in my backyard last night!! I live in Vegas so it's not the country. I saw it flying around earlier, I fly too so I was keeping an eye on it making sure it wasn't flying over our neighborhoods backyards. About an hour later I hear blade noise by my window, then a thump. My father in law thought it was me he said , so when he saw it he waved. Wasn't me. I go out and sure enough it's a Mav Air 2. I pull the battery and wait. Owner shows up 15 mins later. Didn't say sorry, barely said thanks. He said he lost battery power, no duh. I didn't lecture him on flying over peoples backyards , people and busy roadways because he was bigger than me and it's the holidays, so I just told him to fly safe and he was lucky. But seriously, people like that dude are why our hobby is getting squashed. Please fly safe and responsibly in the new year.

    • @51Drones
      @51Drones  6 місяців тому +1

      There are too many people that are irresponsible that lead to the hating of drones.

    • @kennyw871
      @kennyw871 2 місяці тому

      Without FAA permission, Las Vegas is strictly a "No Drone Zone."

  • @PH-md8xp
    @PH-md8xp 6 місяців тому +40

    Security is a genuine concern especially when it comes to China and their geopolitical partners, but this ban seems ill conceived and mainly designed to give Skydio a market advantage.

    • @dougm7737
      @dougm7737 6 місяців тому

      But the China spy balloon is ok to traverse the US!?? The government is so frickn clueless!!

    • @wayneberry3453
      @wayneberry3453 6 місяців тому

      Lmao. Yeh... it's our own government we need to be weary of. 😅 we know where we stand from china, our own government pretends to be our friends.

    • @SideHustleReviews-ws2df
      @SideHustleReviews-ws2df 6 місяців тому +2

      Skydo won't survive and won't be getting the market advantage.

    • @davidjaypeterson644
      @davidjaypeterson644 6 місяців тому +1

      Your phone ?

    • @davidjaypeterson644
      @davidjaypeterson644 6 місяців тому +2

      Skydio is garbage

  • @springguntunes
    @springguntunes 6 місяців тому +12

    It's not about security, it's about greasing palms. Defund the government.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 місяці тому

      they did it in the 90s when they banned made in china firearms and ammo. This happens every time china makes something better than what the US can make.

  • @SCAerials-ep6ly
    @SCAerials-ep6ly 6 місяців тому

    Russ, thank you for your logical, common-sense approach to highlighting this critical issue affecting the Drone Community. Yes, we are all afraid of the overreach and control of any governmental agency. Unfortunately, we are caught in the middle of this mess. As you very well stated, most of the congressional members have yet to learn about drones or how they function. Every drone on the market has chips made in China, so does that mean every drone should NOT be allowed to be used by the government. After the drone is sold, all chips can be reprogrammed for those wanting to do nefarious things.
    I wish you and your family a happy, safe, healthy, and prosperous New Year!!

  • @julianmclean3869
    @julianmclean3869 6 місяців тому

    Happy New Year Russ and many thanks for sharing; I am still not sure what the Legislators are specifically concerned about regards the data (and what could be collected / used in a negative sense); also; are the various states Law Enforcement / Search and Rescue and or any other entity's who are using DJI technology to save lives (and no doubt a number of Commercial Company's, surveying / mapping ect) lobbying to have this reversed? Cheers

  • @johnwatson9518
    @johnwatson9518 6 місяців тому +7

    Sen. Scott also signed the Red Flag Law the instant it was rushed to his desk without doing any due diligence. Ironically, DJI U.S. Headquarters in Miami.

  • @edj5jb469
    @edj5jb469 6 місяців тому +5

    I am a municipal police officer in the middle of starting a UAS program at our local police department to aid us in search and rescue, crash scene photography, etc. No data that we collect provides intelligence value to a foreign government.
    We intend to allow officers to use personally acquired drones (mine being a DJI) on duty, while we waited to secure funds for a larger platform with greater functionality for our needs (thermal, etc.).
    As it relates to our use of personal UAS on duty, which it appears we would need approval to operate (despite having been purchased through non federal funds), but I cannot make out in the legislation WHAT AGENCY provides exemption approval to allow local law enforcement to operate covered UAS.. what department becomes a resource for local agencies to navigate all of this?

  • @Kayakmedic
    @Kayakmedic 6 місяців тому +1

    As someone that does search and rescue in the back country (including National Parks) taking away DJI drones will cost lives

  • @jstewart627
    @jstewart627 5 місяців тому

    I flew in PA. I checked their drone laws. It appears to me that they are just making it clear, DO NOT SPY ON PEOPLE. I can tell you right now that this is interesting to think about because what you do with a done is look around at the scenery. Well, we do have laws that say, do not look into people's windows. I found that funny seeing that law, but the reality is, if the law is not there we can not stop someone from doing that. I read the Google guidelines and this one I find useful. I might be interpreting this wrong, do not upload videos that contain areas that are considered a spot where privacy is expected. So I am confused about privacy fences in people's backyards. Hard to avoid, so i just try to keep camera pointed up and film sunsets, mountains, and birds for fun and if I feel it will not bring me complaint I upload it with monetization turned off to share my fun without having that 107.

  • @weirdmark
    @weirdmark 6 місяців тому +3

    Very thoughtful message. Hope your wife is well.

  • @IraTopp
    @IraTopp 6 місяців тому +6

    I just spent around $3000 on my DJI FPV, 4 extra batteries, and courses to go from my F107 Recreational license, to an F107 Commercial one.
    This is absolutely ridiculous, as someone who was hoping to work with local, state, and federal entities on different projects.

    • @mattzuli6079
      @mattzuli6079 6 місяців тому

      I will take it for you!

    • @john-martin
      @john-martin 6 місяців тому

      How much you willing to let it go for?

    • @Pilotin74
      @Pilotin74 6 місяців тому

      Cool down and enjoy your drone, don’t get all worked up about it. Rick Scott (R) the author of this bill has done nothing of value and continues his streak!

    • @Pilotin74
      @Pilotin74 6 місяців тому

      @@john-martin- I’m good with that too I’d take it in a heartbeat.

  • @keshavharipersad2024
    @keshavharipersad2024 6 місяців тому +1

    I really hope this blows over .. I recently travelled to the us, stayed in Florida, Orlando & Miami and bought my first dji mini 4 pro as a teenager. I was shooting everything with no restrictions, it would be a huge disappointment to see this go.

  • @richardpesce5325
    @richardpesce5325 6 місяців тому +1

    Thanks Russ for the information.

  • @SkyPathProductions
    @SkyPathProductions 6 місяців тому +3

    Will this be the same for commercial operators?

    • @nancyhanson3472
      @nancyhanson3472 6 місяців тому +3

      He talked about this in greater detail in a previous video, and he said if you have connections or get funding in any way from the federal government, then it would affect you. I believe that if you have absolutely no ties to the federal government, it will not affect you.

  • @bp3d106
    @bp3d106 6 місяців тому +6

    I was in the RC hobby when quad copters came on the scene. DJI was one of the first to commercialize it. Some would argue they made it too accessible. Such as clueless operators getting into situations that make the whole hobby look bad. But I've always been impressed with their stuff.

    • @befru
      @befru 6 місяців тому +1

      I think the stereotypical "DJI Pilots" are the ones ruining the drone hobby since most of these new laws are based on something stupid that a selfish/ignorant person did with a DJI drone.

  • @mehoolshah
    @mehoolshah 6 місяців тому

    Wow! Really?
    Thanks for sharing Russ!

  • @darkodimitrijevic8496
    @darkodimitrijevic8496 6 місяців тому

    That was a great video...Russ just told the same things which I have thought about. Thanx Russ !

  • @paulbuxton3907
    @paulbuxton3907 6 місяців тому +3

    Like to know why they think that’s a good idea ! DJI are leaders in the field !

  • @PhillyDroneLife
    @PhillyDroneLife 6 місяців тому +3

    Here we go... Lol.. ahhhhh. Yes be worried and buy your self a rc truck lol.. thx for letting me share

  • @wildpatagoniafilms16
    @wildpatagoniafilms16 6 місяців тому

    Excellent post mate! so informative and eloquently presented! So when you say "recreational" this incudes from the Inspire 3 down... Mavic's , Mini's..AIR's etc,etc...? So documentary filmmakers (like myself...), should be worried...? or the initial ban, is aimed at the larger models used mainly for search or industrial activity...? thanks!!!!

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      Only the federal government agencies, did you not watch the video?

    • @wildpatagoniafilms16
      @wildpatagoniafilms16 6 місяців тому +1

      @@joeg1992 ok angry man... easy there cowboy! 😂 he mentioned that perhaps it could be also to recreational ones... so I thought about asking if that was the "possible" case... which of the recreational. Regardless... WTH is your problem...? chill! Geez...

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      @@wildpatagoniafilms16 My problem is when someone so badly misstates the facts and then causes others, like you to blow them out of proportion, mate.
      You are misinformed or intending to misinform.

    • @wildpatagoniafilms16
      @wildpatagoniafilms16 6 місяців тому +1

      @@joeg1992 😂 my dude... you can't be serious! It is just a freaking question on YT! get over yourself! 😂 or get a GF! 😂 Gosh... you seem very fun to be around! (not!) 😂

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      @@wildpatagoniafilms16 Why are you trying to rile people up? And why does it upset you so much when some one points it out?

  • @louislachapelle3157
    @louislachapelle3157 6 місяців тому

    Thank you for keeping us posted. Now your recommendation of a u.s. monitoring big brother would most likely cool things down.

  • @SuperEddietv
    @SuperEddietv 6 місяців тому +7

    As an actual real pilot, contractor and photographer, this needs to be slapped down until a replacement is put in place if that is how they want to act.

    • @IvanSkyFlight
      @IvanSkyFlight 6 місяців тому

      This law doesn't affect you unless your drone was purchased with federal dollars.

  • @covanfamilyadventures1890
    @covanfamilyadventures1890 6 місяців тому +5

    Also best believe, ANY time the government says it’s for safety…..it’s all about money and control.

  • @markanderson7091
    @markanderson7091 6 місяців тому +1

    Great work!

  • @andyp.4205
    @andyp.4205 6 місяців тому

    Great video Russ! What's your take on Autel leaving the consumer side like Skydio? I'm hesitant about adding the Autel Lite Plus in addition to my DJI drones because of no-NFZ restrictions for Autel. Autel is very good about responding to emails and indicated support will continue for years.

  • @jlutz63
    @jlutz63 6 місяців тому +19

    I know that DJI may be dangerous with it being from China, but their drones are truely unmatched and this can cause many problems. I really love my DJI Mini 2 and I plan to upgrade

    • @adamtheminecrafter7877
      @adamtheminecrafter7877 6 місяців тому +5

      LOL! I have the same drone! Agreed though, they cannot be matched.

    • @mjones82
      @mjones82 6 місяців тому +9

      DJI is not dangerous in ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM..They've implemented so many safety features and GEO fencing preventing from flying in areas that are sensitive. They've worked with the FAA and implemented so much into their product. This all stems from the one party in particular that has always had fear instilled in their followers about any foreign company that has a superior product over an American product.

    • @merlands1
      @merlands1 6 місяців тому +7

      If Drones are dangerous then what about laptops ?

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 6 місяців тому

      @@mjones82 lol, and there it is, someone drags in politics, making claims that are not true. This was bi partisan. Biden signed it into law.

    • @skunkworksmusicgroup
      @skunkworksmusicgroup 6 місяців тому +2

      Remember back when those AOL cds were everywhere? At every checkout counter and in every mailbox on a weekly basis for about a year straight? Then Netscape jumped in and AOL gobbled them up as a bundle? At the same time you needed a computer and tied up your home phone line surfing the seemingly endless information until someone tried to make a phone call and cut off your dial-up connection.😅 Yeah, the law and congress tried this back then as well and the market for it just exploded in their hands because they were being advised by greed and nothing else. The world passes us up because total doo doo brains are our choice for leadership. There is ALWAYS a way to provide safety before product release. Simultaneously while chewing your gum.

  • @moparmike2535
    @moparmike2535 6 місяців тому +5

    We should be using American made products whenever they are available. Our reliance on our enemy for products is just plain ridiculous.

    • @nancyhanson3472
      @nancyhanson3472 6 місяців тому +1

      This is true.

    • @raze3297
      @raze3297 6 місяців тому +2

      DJI isn't our enemy.

    • @nancyhanson3472
      @nancyhanson3472 6 місяців тому +2

      @@raze3297 No, but China is. And every time we purchase a product made in China, we are supporting the economy of that country (which I believe is eventually going to have a very detrimental effect on all western democracies, since they have made it pretty clear that world domination is their eventual goal.)

    • @firepuncher1
      @firepuncher1 6 місяців тому

      iPhone?

  • @SkyBoundCharlie
    @SkyBoundCharlie 6 місяців тому

    Love your content

  • @halwagle
    @halwagle 5 місяців тому

    Good job by you! As always.

  • @johnbrennan2723
    @johnbrennan2723 6 місяців тому +4

    China gets an upload of everything your drone recorded on last flight each time u connect to fly. I have to connect to DJI each time I fly for upload/download. At this point DJI pulls flight path info and data acquired since last log in. China keeps all that data stored from every flight from every DJI drone. That is a real important point that drone enthusiasts conveniently forget to point out, I mean isn't that the most important thing u need to know about your drone or your neighbors drone who flies over you and then sends data to China.

    • @raze3297
      @raze3297 6 місяців тому +4

      And what exactly would they be getting from that flight data that they wouldn't get by just, say, going on Google Maps?

    • @johnbrennan2723
      @johnbrennan2723 6 місяців тому

      @@raze3297 my drone records video data.

  • @brucew.willett8196
    @brucew.willett8196 6 місяців тому +3

    The software from these Chinese countries and the CCP are extensive and interconnected. Everything that it comes into contract with because accessible to the CCP. Similar to TikTok.

  • @rlbutterfield
    @rlbutterfield 6 місяців тому

    Very good presentation! 👍🏻🙂

  • @TSSolutionsPro
    @TSSolutionsPro 6 місяців тому +1

    The problem is not where it is made but where the data is stored and collected.

  • @scottmgraves
    @scottmgraves 6 місяців тому

    Thanks so much for this info. As a university professor, I regularly write grants (NSF, NOAA) to support my coastal drone mapping research. I use navicular drones. If I use “other $” to purchase dji drones but use fed $ to support the research/field work & flying…. Am I going to be in trouble?

  • @robertdahl5825
    @robertdahl5825 6 місяців тому

    Thanks for the information Russ. I have 2 of them and love them

  • @williamschwartz9283
    @williamschwartz9283 5 місяців тому +1

    Then why did I have to submit my license and registration to get an access code that enabled my drone for flight near a nuclear power facility, not from the FAA, not from the NRC, not from any federal or local government agency I had to get it from DJI. You can't make this stuff up.

  • @phoenixr6811
    @phoenixr6811 6 місяців тому +2

    I see some government agencies having some issues with this 🤔didn’t anyone in these agencies that utilize these drone say anything or did they just figure that the bill wouldn’t go through🤔

  • @dubjspecialk
    @dubjspecialk 6 місяців тому +1

    This portion of the bill was a lobby effort by American drone companies. This frustrates me because in America, most of us would PREFER to buy American made products, and we WOULD, if they didn't completely SUCK. If Skydio, Brinc, etc would spend half as much money and effort into making a BETTER PRODUCT as they spend in lobbying for their own monopoly, more would buy them.
    This bill essentially destroys drone programs for MANY agencies and groups that could not afford anything other than DJI. And many of these agencies are literally saving lives with their current drone programs. It's a damn shame. The phone in your pocket is more dangerous, intelligence wise, than any Chinese drone will ever be.

  • @dogzillamonster
    @dogzillamonster 6 місяців тому +2

    Agree with everything you said. Including about how nothing that most of us do has anything to do with critical-anything.

    • @joeg1992
      @joeg1992 6 місяців тому

      Yes, you are correct, none of us do anything related to critical-anything, that is why we are not being banned, only federal agencies are being banned. Did you not watch the video?

    • @dogzillamonster
      @dogzillamonster 6 місяців тому

      @@joeg1992 I watched every second of the video.

  • @gabrielsenecal382
    @gabrielsenecal382 6 місяців тому +1

    As a Canadian, flying occasionally in United States, because I’m a truck driver, it’s not my main concern, but all my drones are DJI, if it comes to complete ban, I just not gonna fly, In United States

  • @mannyvproductions
    @mannyvproductions 6 місяців тому

    Great video.

  • @2Cav_Vet
    @2Cav_Vet 6 місяців тому

    Florida public safety drone team here... experienced this first hand as we had to shelve our Matrice 300 for a Skydio X2E after Florida passed SB44. Skydio is neck deep in lobbying any politician who will listen.... And yes, it did affect our ability to provide the type of services we did before the ban, there is no comparison between the quality of what we had, and what we have now. Sad.

  • @jstewart627
    @jstewart627 5 місяців тому

    Software installed on an American's phone should be under the absolute control of an American software company. I dont like that DJI bypasses the google play store to install its software. I suspect that means that it will bypass googles security tools that they give us, such as truly removing the software. The proper way to truly removes software that was installed without an OS supervision is to format the hard drive then reinstall the OS. I have no idea how to do that on a phone other than the factory reset. I am used to pulling out a physical hard drive in a computer, erasing it with a good conputer, then putting it back in all clean, and installing it. Or use a boot chip and format the hard drive, then install os.

  • @joeymaterese8095
    @joeymaterese8095 3 місяці тому

    Great video I'm with you on every turn...No DJI ban

  • @joshs7347
    @joshs7347 6 місяців тому

    Opinion here, fresh into the drone scene. Still learning a ton and still within the return range of my DJI drones… is there an even close competition? As far as affordable and high performance as DJI? Or would the industry need to band together to keep this from being monopolistic in the worst way?
    Or should I return my drones asap for refund and buy from USA or build my own drones?
    Anyone have any info about International DJI use? I plan on traveling once I obtain my 107 for cinematic work

  • @davidmatney5033
    @davidmatney5033 5 місяців тому

    Thank you for another informative video! I have an off-topic question. Will my DJI Mavic 3 Pro (and Mini 3 Pro) notify/warn me if I am approaching Controlled Airspace? Obviously I will avoid the situation and it has not come-up thus far, but just wanted to know if I will receive a warning before my drone were to drop out of the sky, etc? Thank you!

  • @KevinMullett
    @KevinMullett 2 місяці тому

    I am absolutely sick of this "Because we say so..." bullcrap.

  • @guidoftc8304
    @guidoftc8304 6 місяців тому +1

    Our government is always worried about the wrong shit that's the problem

  • @TheCivildecay
    @TheCivildecay 4 місяці тому

    As someone that works with drones for a government agency I can assure that the DJI pilot and DJI fly apps do make connection to a Chinese government website (but also amazone) when you use the app. (This can be checked with a port/traffic scan)

  • @veryberry-
    @veryberry- 6 місяців тому

    This is exactly like the ban of Dahua or Hikvision IP Cameras for Federal contracts. Consumers can still buy them. They're just banned for feds.

  • @norcalnewsnetwork
    @norcalnewsnetwork 6 місяців тому +1

    We need to ban together and get the institute for justice to file a lawsuit against the government for a unconstitutional law or ban.

  • @BuckRecovery
    @BuckRecovery 5 місяців тому

    Everyone needs to email and call there state reps . It only takes a few minutes to do. Please do this .

  • @andrewfjoy
    @andrewfjoy 6 місяців тому +1

    It is concerning that the DJI Geo Zone maps show all of the Minuteman Missle Silos as Military Installations... specifically noted in Montana, Wyoming, and Nebraska. It is hard to believe that the US Government would provide those locations to DJI... However, it's apparent that they did indeed.

    • @51Drones
      @51Drones  6 місяців тому +1

      All things that can easily be found on Google Maps. 🤷🏻‍♂️