Why did Germany Invade the Rest of Czechoslovakia?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 жов 2023
  • Hitler's final invasion of Czechoslovakia is usually just put down to blind aggression. Is this really what happened though? The situation is far more complex than that and for some reason it's only ever given a passing mention in the history books. Today I will tell you what actually happened. Why did the Czechoslovakian state collapse? Why did Hitler not invade Slovakia? Why did the Czechs not resist? Why did the Czechs enjoy the occupation so much at first? I will answer all of these questions in this video.
    Patreon : / zoomerhistorian
    SubscribeStar: www.subscribestar.com/zoomerh...
    UA-cam Membership: / @zoomerhistorian
    One-Time Donations: www.buymeacoffee.com/ZoomerHi...
    Telegram: t.me/zoomerhistorian
    Sources:
    John Toland - Adolf Hitler
    A.J.P Taylor - The Origins of the Second World War
    Richard Tedor - Hitler's Revolution
    David Irving - The War Path
    Pat Buchanan - Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary war
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @zacharyvortivask9734
    @zacharyvortivask9734 8 місяців тому +538

    The dissing of Oversimplified is so based

    • @Fallout3131
      @Fallout3131 4 місяці тому +93

      It’s true tho, I used to love over simplified till I realized it was basically for little kids

    • @ArslanMagomedov286
      @ArslanMagomedov286 3 місяці тому +20

      @@Fallout3131lol me too I feel like he simplified to many things

    • @fishfossils8858
      @fishfossils8858 3 місяці тому +39

      @@ArslanMagomedov286imagine being upset at a channel called OVERSIMPLIFIED for being OVERSIMPLIFIED. Lol yeah, alot of information isn’t 100% accurate, because its a synopsis, a brief overview, heavy on the jokes. It’s something i can sit my 5 year old in front of and she’ll watch and learn something rather than sticking her in front of cocomeleon or whatever crap they make for kids these days.

    • @ArslanMagomedov286
      @ArslanMagomedov286 3 місяці тому +17

      @@fishfossils8858 bro when did I ever say I hated oversimplified. I love him. just felt that as I grew up, he wasn’t being a very good son to me. So I disowned him. I also felt as if he made a very reductive view of very complex events, which was alright for time beings. I still watch him

    • @ChaoticLoreVideos
      @ChaoticLoreVideos 3 місяці тому +4

      he was your son?@@ArslanMagomedov286

  • @hankwest5662
    @hankwest5662 3 місяці тому +165

    It's taken years for me to find a history channel that is unbiased and doesn't treat me like a naive child.

    • @user-pn7jz9vr2z
      @user-pn7jz9vr2z 2 місяці тому +5

      Truer words couldn't have been said

    • @dudebro91-fn7rz
      @dudebro91-fn7rz 2 місяці тому +13

      Lol this is not unbiased.

    • @jhonjhon3715
      @jhonjhon3715 2 місяці тому +2

      @@dudebro91-fn7rzhow so?

    • @hugo3627
      @hugo3627 2 місяці тому

      @@jhonjhon3715 This guy sights David Irving who is a convicted holocaust denier and proven in a court of law to be a liar.

    • @rightmunted7538
      @rightmunted7538 Місяць тому +1

      This isn't just biased, but you can easily see that almost everything he says is untrue or greatly exaggerated with even the most surface level cross referencing.
      If you think this is some great unbiased UA-cam channel and not some Brittish brainlet trying to rewrite n@zis into decent human beings you're an imbecile.

  • @NephilimDestroyer
    @NephilimDestroyer 8 місяців тому +341

    Who needs enemies when you have Allies like Mussolini

  • @alex4our3hree66
    @alex4our3hree66 4 місяці тому +67

    Also people never mention that until the dissolution of Czecho-Slovakia in 1939, the Franco-Czecho-Soviet pact was still (at least de jure) active. If a war broke out, France and Soviet union would declare war on Germany and Rumania would have to let Soviet troops go through her territory. For those who don't know, this pact was the product of the Barthou-Titulescu-Beneš policy from 1935 which had a plan of completely isolating Germany from all sides, the pact was supposed to include all Little Entente members and Poland.

  • @baldwinslab
    @baldwinslab 3 місяці тому +58

    I’m amazed your channel exists. , information like this just wasn’t possible to be accessed this easily in the past. Good job!

  • @jamesdean1143
    @jamesdean1143 5 місяців тому +36

    Not the victor’s history narrative.

  • @iosefamr8289
    @iosefamr8289 8 місяців тому +167

    Mussolini try not to go one zoomerhistorian video without throwing a temper tantrum challenge: 99% IMPOSSIBLE

    • @ZoomerHistorian
      @ZoomerHistorian  8 місяців тому +65

      And why he keep sperging 😂

    • @Ww-lf3cz
      @Ww-lf3cz 5 місяців тому +1

      @thesnownigro7932 mussolini was way worse (im saying this as a democrat)

    • @dankcaesar4760
      @dankcaesar4760 5 місяців тому +7

      ​@@Ww-lf3czyou're brave

    • @thomasmills3934
      @thomasmills3934 4 місяці тому

      ​@Ww-lf3cz why the hell are you a Democrat? ...have you been paying attention?

    • @vgames6792
      @vgames6792 4 місяці тому

      @@ZoomerHistorian You just making stuff up, this was absolutely disgusting. Just the fact that you contradicting yourself in many cases shows that you are lying scuuum. As for the beloved heidrich he planned to "remove" up to 60% of czechs who werent suitable for germanification, another FACT you forgot to mentioned in your BS fairy tail story 🤮🤮🤮

  • @wewillovercome5168
    @wewillovercome5168 8 місяців тому +79

    Ive been waiting for this video.Thanks for your work.

  • @rhysnichols8608
    @rhysnichols8608 8 місяців тому +222

    I will always be absolutely BAMBOOZLED at the sheer ridiculousness of the Versailles treaty. Which idiots thought these boarder arrangements would be a good idea?

    • @THINKincessantly
      @THINKincessantly 8 місяців тому +1

      The same idiots that drew the national lines in the middle east….

    • @what-uy7go
      @what-uy7go 8 місяців тому +23

      they were developed in consideration for the strategic and individual objects of the victors. The general consensus was either create a new state with strong borders, economic & military capacity or don't create one at all... other examples are Romania, Hungary, Greece, and Poland. For the Czechs the sudeten region provided economic strength & natural defenses, along with their own historical claims to the region as a part of the bohemian crown. Germany made plenty of ridiculous claims on territory, often far dumber than the Czech's claim to the sudetenland, you can't be complaining about its logic while advocating for a country that did the exact same

    • @Crashed131963
      @Crashed131963 8 місяців тому +45

      There was no ww2 in Europe.
      It was WW1 after a ceasefire.

    • @ottersirotten4290
      @ottersirotten4290 8 місяців тому +34

      @@what-uy7go "Germany made plenty of ridiculous claims on territory, often far dumber than the Czech's claim to the sudetenland"
      for Example?

    • @williamthebonquerer9181
      @williamthebonquerer9181 7 місяців тому +6

      ​@@ottersirotten4290Germany making any claims on territory was ridiculous. The peace was a dictate, Germany never accepted an armistice under the condition of it being on the 14 points

  • @im160bpmplus
    @im160bpmplus 4 місяці тому +18

    Incredible work dude

  • @justadildeau
    @justadildeau 8 місяців тому +60

    Watched every video you uploaded. Keep it up Zoomer🔥

  • @fastpublish
    @fastpublish 3 місяці тому +90

    The British lecturing anyone on the occupation of foreign countries ... hilarious!

    • @Valencetheshireman927
      @Valencetheshireman927 3 місяці тому +6

      British people can’t discuss the occupation of other countries or their own?

    • @fuwa9616
      @fuwa9616 3 місяці тому +17

      @@Valencetheshireman927 Absolutely not, especially when trying to mix it with moral judgement. There is a reason nonwesterners do not cling onto the moral narrative of that war. No one sees Germany and the UK as any different.

    • @Valencetheshireman927
      @Valencetheshireman927 3 місяці тому +11

      @@fuwa9616 That seems quite insane. You’re really suggesting the Germans can’t talk about the occupation of their own land by the Soviets?

    • @Cyricist001
      @Cyricist001 3 місяці тому +7

      @@Valencetheshireman927
      "the occupation of other countries " this wasn't about the occupation of their own country but invading other ones, in that aspect Britain can't hold the moral judgement towards Germany.

    • @Valencetheshireman927
      @Valencetheshireman927 3 місяці тому +6

      @@Cyricist001 That means nobody can pass “moral judgment” on others for the occupation of other countries, because every culture through history has done it.

  • @InReality33
    @InReality33 3 місяці тому +14

    Over-simplified, indeed! Thanks, ZH.

  • @rc59191
    @rc59191 8 місяців тому +55

    Good video as always hope you go into some of the history of the war in Croatia and other parts of Yugoslavia that usually get glosser over.

  • @SatireNGiggles
    @SatireNGiggles 2 місяці тому +2

    Great content

  • @ArtisanRykard
    @ArtisanRykard 8 місяців тому +98

    Another well done video, my friend.
    It's a shame what happened to the Germans in the Sudetenland after the war. This video was definitely on the darker side in details. Loved it. 💪🏻

    • @ZoomerHistorian
      @ZoomerHistorian  8 місяців тому +17

      Thanks so much as always mate!

    • @DrJones20
      @DrJones20 8 місяців тому

      Do the German war crimes in Belarus next, burning down thousands of villages oh wait you would never do that.

    • @arminiuscherusci4410
      @arminiuscherusci4410 7 місяців тому +17

      Im a decendant of a sudeten german. Wie are still alive!

    • @punishedgloyperstormtroope8098
      @punishedgloyperstormtroope8098 5 місяців тому +6

      @@arminiuscherusci4410now Germany and Czechia are in the EU you should move back to the Sudetenland, property prices are cheaper there than Germany also, and it’s less woke.
      You can work in Germany and live in Czechia / Bohemia

    • @tomaspisecky4835
      @tomaspisecky4835 5 місяців тому +8

      It’s a shame what happened to so many Czechs and others in Auschvitz and other camps and how polite gestapo was, memory of Heinlein NSDAP and how apprised it was by most Germans was in fresh memory and returning people as well as communist fighters coming from eastern front plus influence of red army caused so much unrest that it wasn’t in government power to guarantee the safety of the minority hence the move to deport them to Germany most of them wished to be part couple years back anyway (so actually fulfilling their dream, which wasn’t as appealing now when Germany lied in ruins) The intentions of Germany to wipe out Czechoslovakia was clear to us - read Frantisek Moravec memoir - Master of spies, and you will know what was known to us and dismissed by our English and French allies. Btw Germans settled upon invitation by Bohemian kings and granted right to settle under condition they will be loyal to the Czech/Bohemian government/crown/nation the conditions they clearly broke and as that it could be looked at their removal from the land out as they lost the right to settle here. And it is not easy for German to move back in and own property in Czech Republic as post war Benes’s decrees are still in force and as Czech citizen completely agree with it. (You can acquire Czech citizenship if you like, but even that is not that as easy, you can get residency as anywhere in EU, but owning a property is not as easy - as resident you can setup Czech company which would own the property you’d be living - one of the way I can think of how German can own the property here if somebody actually sell to German)

  • @raxit1337
    @raxit1337 2 місяці тому +28

    Saying that the Czechs have no real claim on the border areas is very dishonest. A czech state with those borders has existed since the 9th century, before being incorporated into Austria.

    • @Lockfly
      @Lockfly Місяць тому +9

      Bohemia was German ruled, if anything Germans had more of a claim on the Czech areas of Bohemia than Czechs had on the German areas since Bohemia was founded and ruled ever since as a German country.

    • @ja_pocitacove_hry_nehraji69
      @ja_pocitacove_hry_nehraji69 Місяць тому +1

      @@Lockfly :D

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral Місяць тому +5

      ​@@LockflyHow was Bohemia german ruled? Yes it was part of the Holy Roman Empire but that was more of a loose confederation of states than an empire. And Bohemia was one of the elctor states that elected the emperor. Bohemian kings were Czechs.

    • @drstrangelove4998
      @drstrangelove4998 Місяць тому +1

      The Holy Roman Empire had It’s capital in Cologne and German culture, trade, universities extended right up to the Baltic States to East Prussia. The dominant language, jurisprudence and Universities spoke German. Until the end of WW2 and the Soviets took over.

    • @thekinghass
      @thekinghass Місяць тому

      Sorry but can you tell me the state name because I only remember Holy Roman Empire control and before them manly the Avers surrounding by the first bulgian empire and the the first great Slavic migration under the supposed rule of Byzantine empire

  • @GovernorAdmiral
    @GovernorAdmiral 3 місяці тому +31

    As a Slovak myself I feel obligated to inform you that the creation of Slovakia was less helping to independence and more reducing us to a puppet state with some priviliges. We were partially ocupied, we lost whole south of our country and ended up with less independence than in Czechoslovakia.
    We had some priviliges but the moment we resisted we lost them and got brutal treatment from the Germans like the Czechs and Polish.
    You cannot put Vojtech Tukas words as what Slovakians wanted. He was considerrd a radical even in HSĽS, the party that ruled Slovakia during ww2. The Slovakians were pretty split if they should remain a part of Czechoslovakia.
    We didnt want to be allies of Germany any more than the Czechs or Polish. And also saying that Czechs liked the ocupation is bullshit. The Germans burnt entire villages and slaughtered thousands of civilians.

    • @Letsplay222
      @Letsplay222 3 місяці тому +5

      Does anyone "like" being occupied? It's a question of the alternatives, being run by the Czechs or worse, the Soviets.

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral 3 місяці тому +11

      ​@@Letsplay222
      Czechs and soviets opressed us as well. But the Czechs still gave us some representation and the soviet opression was worse than the Czech one. But neither Czechs nor the soviets burned villages and executed thousands of innocent civilians as an example. They also didnt force us to export our jewish population to concentration camps and to pay for their "liquidation".
      And if WW2 never happend it is unlikely that we would have become a puppet state of the soviets.

    • @Letsplay222
      @Letsplay222 3 місяці тому +9

      @@GovernorAdmiral Yes, but at the time the Germans were burning villages and liquidating Jews, they were being vice-gripped by the United States, British Empire and Soviet Union in a fight against annihilation. If the Soviets or Czechs were under similar circumstances, they would have done the same or worse.
      And the Soviets would have come for everyone eventually, until they were stopped.

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral 3 місяці тому +5

      ​@@Letsplay222
      I am not debating the fact that the soviets were bad or that other nations would do the same in the Germans situation (except for the jews). I am just saying that the video made it look like we Slovakians wanted to be allies of the Germans and begged them to come and liberate us and that the Czechs loved the ocupation. I am not saying that neither Czechs nor Slovaks are innocent, but this video leaves out important information and presents other information out of context.

    • @user-wj6dt5bq3w
      @user-wj6dt5bq3w 3 місяці тому +4

      @@GovernorAdmiral You act like Tiso was "forced" to do everything, sounds like a fake story you've been told by the current Slovakian government to blame the Germans for their own crimes.

  • @wasfureinbua
    @wasfureinbua 3 місяці тому

    very interesting video

  • @DrewPicklesTheDark
    @DrewPicklesTheDark 3 місяці тому +14

    I have been watching these videos, and I think they are good. They are clearly Axis biased, but I think that's good since 99% of other WW2 videos are Allied bias. Back after the Napoleonic Wars, Napoleon was "Literally Hitler" for ~100 years, before people started looking at his side of the story, and his impact on history more objectively. It's been nice to see Hitler getting the same treatment in my lifetime, because the WW2 story never made sense to me, even as a kid. I had dozens, if not hundreds of questions teachers and such couldn't answer, or could only answer "Well Hitler was crazy so that's why it didn't make sense". I knew most of the info in these videos already, but I like these since they are a very digestible for most people.

  • @rocka8359
    @rocka8359 4 місяці тому +56

    Takový prznění historie je fakt potupný, kde proboha vytáhl že češi milovali masového vraha Heydricha, to je vrchol xdddd

    • @alesjanosik1545
      @alesjanosik1545 4 місяці тому +8

      A jak krásně se nám tehdy žilo :)

    • @JanRiffler
      @JanRiffler 4 місяці тому +10

      Ano. Milovali ho. Proto lítal po Praze v kabrioletu.

    • @F_Yale
      @F_Yale 4 місяці тому

      🤡🤡🤡🤡 xdddddddddd

    • @Sp00nexe
      @Sp00nexe 3 місяці тому +21

      teenageři ze západu vás poučují o tom, že okupace od země, která vás považovala za druhořadého občana, není nic hrozného LOL

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral 3 місяці тому

      Kto na svete sa pozrie na nemcov, ktorý za smrť jedného človeka zabili tisícky a povie si: „áno, tento národ zlepšil Československo ”.

  • @arturogranados1133
    @arturogranados1133 8 місяців тому +32

    You really are prolific. It is incredibly hard to get the cold hard facts of this era and you have so far achieved to disseminate more historical truth in your videos than I have seen in a very long time. Godspeed and keep up the great work.

    • @ZoomerHistorian
      @ZoomerHistorian  8 місяців тому +5

      Thank you very much mate

    • @vinnsterpj
      @vinnsterpj 4 місяці тому

      you are both delusional. do not have kids

  • @gratefulguy4130
    @gratefulguy4130 8 місяців тому +22

    No matter how long, these videos are always over too soon.

  • @carolinj7398
    @carolinj7398 8 місяців тому +13

    Have you read Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof's book "1939:The war that had many fathers". I found it quite easy to digest, since it is not chronological, but sorted by themes.

    • @ZoomerHistorian
      @ZoomerHistorian  8 місяців тому +5

      I haven’t yet no but read many books which use that as a source, it’s on my to-read list though

    • @prollkoffer
      @prollkoffer 3 місяці тому +2

      I absolutely recommend it. Really changed the way I saw things!

    • @egalwas7998
      @egalwas7998 24 дні тому

      @@ZoomerHistorianzu diesem Thema gibt es noch ein Buch: Hitler und deine Tschechen. Kann ich sehr empfehlen. Auch den tschechischen Zuhörern, das Buch gibt es auch auf tschechisch, im Original.

  • @klimismistakidis1482
    @klimismistakidis1482 8 місяців тому +32

    So interesting to listen to this more realistic way history played out. Thank you.

  • @ianrhodes83
    @ianrhodes83 8 місяців тому +24

    Well done and well researched. Keep up the good work

  • @wiz59
    @wiz59 8 місяців тому +14

    This is great

  • @tombombadil9123
    @tombombadil9123 5 місяців тому +75

    26:25 The Czechs were so happy with the German occupation that at the end of the war they massacred the Germans :D

    • @orangekilla3374
      @orangekilla3374 4 місяці тому

      It was the communists that massacred the Germans

    • @fuwa9616
      @fuwa9616 3 місяці тому

      So a small group of czechs were racial bigots who started the war. Exactly why most think the USSR was justified in what it did after.

    • @Hadriantheemperorofrome
      @Hadriantheemperorofrome 3 місяці тому

      Czechs are cowards !!
      Saying this as a Czech

    • @KrokLP
      @KrokLP 3 місяці тому +43

      The Czechs massacred Germans even before the occupation

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral 3 місяці тому +13

      ​@@KrokLP
      Massacred is a strong word. They were somewhat opressed but there was no mass extermination. Unlike what the Germans did after they conquered Czechoslovakia.

  • @MaskoT096
    @MaskoT096 3 місяці тому +21

    Interesting video, but I have to wonder why, why there is no mention of the anti-occupation protest of czech students, and death, where german civil police was ordered to shoot into crowd, which resulted in death of Jan Opletal. More over forced removal of czechs from sudetenland which I saw estimated to be about 120k people, which seems like a very similar number to unemployed people in protektorat. It seems weird to mention the protest after the Heydrich atentat and not the student protest in 1939. For those reasons this video seems very biased.

    • @clmberserker245
      @clmberserker245 3 місяці тому +9

      of course he is biased, but on the other hand, you can read this on literally any mainstream article or video about the matter. zoomer historian is posting the other side of the coin. i agree that the ideal is to show both sides simultaneously

    • @MaskoT096
      @MaskoT096 3 місяці тому +4

      @@clmberserker245 and there would be nothing wrong about it if he wouldnt say: "I will give you the full story." just one minute into the video btw. My problem with him is his claims of unbiased history in every video, yet he forgots to mention significant things and leaves of important historical context.

    • @GromitLover2012
      @GromitLover2012 3 місяці тому

      This guy is a nazi what do you expect

    • @FantadiRienzo
      @FantadiRienzo 3 місяці тому +8

      Listen guy: ever noticed that all the parts of Eastern Europe that used to be ruled by Germans are to this day the best developed? So after WW1, Czechoslovakia was left with a with a comparatively excellent infrastructure, an excellent education system and an excellent industry. But they decided to hate the Germans. During the Second World War, what is now the Czech Republic was the armory of the empire, an enormous amount of weapons and vehicles were manufactured there, and even after the war, Czechoslovakia was one of the top exporters of weapons. There was comparatively little destruction there. And people cooperated as long as the Germans were stronger. But once they were helpless, they showed their true colors. I understand, you have to justify a genocide. You have to be the victim here. But the thing is, if someone steals your wallet, you don't have the right to kill his family. At least that's my opinion.

    • @MaskoT096
      @MaskoT096 3 місяці тому +5

      @@FantadiRienzo Hello, so about the infrastructure, education and industry. I do not dispute that. Now they did not just decided to hate germans after war. I believe there were nationalist tensions between czechs and germans in like 1800s eg. Czech national revival. About czech lands being the armory of reich: no dispute there. Same goes for destruction. I would say most people cooperated, because of fear of execution or imprisonment or they benefited from it greatly(which I think was rather the exception). Now a lot of people were frustrated by the war and when it ended they took out the frustration on anyone german. Which obviosly was not jistified and wrong. And later the forced expulsion was even worse. I would say that it was probably one of the worst mistakes of 20th century. So you are wrong I have no need to justify this genocide or any other genocide. But my original comment was about the bias, that I think Zoomer historian displays in his videos. I am from village, that is just 2 km from the where sudetenland was and from reading testimonies of regular folk from this area I know the czech and german confilict was never black and white.

  • @MegaSnake001
    @MegaSnake001 8 місяців тому +22

    God Bless You, thank you for all your work!

  • @Eristtx
    @Eristtx 5 місяців тому +55

    Although my knowledge may be skewed by the standard narrative, the entire first half (I didn't watch any further) doesn't sit well with me.
    - Why the Sudetenland fell to the Czech Republic - yes, the main argument was the viability of such a state. But at the same time it was the territory of the Kingdom of Bohemia. Whether that's enough as a reason I don't presume to judge, but it's not exactly like Czechoslovakia stole a random chunk of Germany.
    - The whole excuse and reason Hitler attacked Czechoslovakia... eh. He wrote it in Main Kamf back in 1925 (seizing the Sudetenland). The real planning started in 1933. All the rest about oppression, genocide etc was just an effort to destabilize Czechoslovakia and separate it from the allies. Once that was done, the fate of Czechoslovakia was clear.
    - Of course, there were real problems (e.g. the effects of the economic crisis, which hit mainly the industrial parts), which Hitler fed by supporting radical Sudeten German groups in the borderlands, who then carried out attacks.
    - The Polish-German plan of attack - that's bullshit. It may have occurred to someone, but there was no such plan in any serious sense. It doesn't even make sense, because Czechoslovakia was betting on alliance treaties with France, Great Britain and Russia. The hope was that if we defended ourselves, the powers would come to the rescue. If we attacked, we would suddenly be the aggressor.
    - Mobilisation was more a demonstration of strength and determination to defend ourselves. As I see it, Hitler was testing whether the Czechoslovak government at the time would be capable of such a move (it was perceived as weak due to skirmishes in the borderlands etc).
    In conclusion, the Czech Republic is not innocent. There was some resentment towards the Germans, etc. But at the same time, Czechoslovakia had the most liberal constitution, and for a long time German parties boycotted participation in parliament. Realistically, given the circumstances, the mix of internal and external influences was such that Czechoslovakia never had a chance to survive.
    If Czechoslovakia deserves criticism for anything, it is the expulsion of the Sudeten Germans (or the atrocities that accompanied it). By contrast, in the period before the Second World War, Czechoslovakia was dealt a hand that, in my opinion, it managed to manage just fine.
    However, I admit that my perception may be distorted by the fact that I am Czech and thus may have a natural tendency to perceive it in a certain way, at the same time I had only limited space for research. Therefore, this is more of an "opinion" than an attempt to give a 100% objective description.

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 4 місяці тому +20

      As a Czech i agree with you but not the video

    • @adambadam4870
      @adambadam4870 4 місяці тому +25

      The video is a nahzee apologetic slop for 4chan users, Americans who can't even point Prague on the map, and when they do they know more about which type of button what SS regiment had than the history of the region oitside of 1939-1945 period.

    • @KrokLP
      @KrokLP 3 місяці тому +10

      ​@@adambadam4870 You are the ones who only want people to remember what happened between 1939 and spring 1945. Don't let people hear what happened starting in 1918 or what happened in 1945-1947. I've seen your people laugh when the Brno death march is mentioned. "The final solution of the German question" as your oh so social and oh so democratic hero called Benes called the campaign 😊

    • @andreasfranzgass8525
      @andreasfranzgass8525 3 місяці тому

      Like you said the video at least should include the protest following the occupation.

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 3 місяці тому +5

      @@KrokLP I would agree that what happen during 1945 - 1947 is not talk enough.
      Who did you see laugh about the Brno death march? Or are you just pulling it out of your ass. I dont think that many people from here would call Beneš a hero (or even a good president some hate him for accepting munich agreement others understand why he accepted the agreement) thats like calling Jimmy Carter a american hero.

  • @miroslavadamkovic461
    @miroslavadamkovic461 5 місяців тому +75

    Czechs were so happy to be occupied that anti German demonstrations had barely 3x more attendees than the one you mention after Heydrich's assassination (and which was totally spontaneous, of course). The Czechs also loved that their universities were closed half a year after the occupation and half of grammar schools by 1942, coz what good is education for them, right?
    Totaleinsatz was totally loved as well, who would not love to be working their bum off in the Reich for 70 hours a week living in a dorm with one shower for 100 inmates. A great holiday for which nearly 10% of population totally voluntarily applied for.

    • @tiagomonteiro130
      @tiagomonteiro130 4 місяці тому +1

      Lmao source : Soviet American propaganda i am sure the Czechs love the fact that their population is going down, that they have climate idiots gluing themselves on streets, and that degenerate leftists call Woman a social construct, funny how you mention university's while now these university's teach diversity propaganda lol.

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 4 місяці тому

      ​@tiagomonteiro130 2,5 million but true

    • @ovca410
      @ovca410 4 місяці тому +15

      Forgot to mention, how Hacha was happy, when he announced to people of czechia, that they are protected by Germans now, that his voice shaked, like he's going to cry. And how Hacha was happy, when was theatened, that Hitler would slaughter all czechs

    • @adambadam4870
      @adambadam4870 4 місяці тому +23

      The sheer insanity of the claims in the video is a testament to a total echochamber people who made it live in.

    • @fuwa9616
      @fuwa9616 3 місяці тому +7

      @@adambadam4870 the insantiy is thinking that a small group of warhawk chihuahua nationalist czech being bigots somehow makes your side look good and not validate the video claims.

  • @fastpublish
    @fastpublish 3 місяці тому +15

    Missed the bus ... missed the boat ... the hidden influence of public transport on world history.

  • @timeanagy8495
    @timeanagy8495 3 місяці тому +5

    As for the so called Slovakia: every m2 in Slovakia and Ruthenia (now stolen by Ukraine) was Hungarian land before. Slovakians were just a minority in Hungary. There were never any Czechoslovak nation. Almost half of Slovakia was not Slovakian, 30% of it was Hungarian. In the main two cities almost no Slovakians lived in Slovakia... Czechoslovakia was created by the winners of wwi in order to weaken Hungary.

    • @somerandomgadzo4778
      @somerandomgadzo4778 3 місяці тому +1

      not hungary, kingdom of hungary, or "Uhorsko". Now why is this differnet ? Because latin was spoken and people didn't have any identity until the 19th century when hungarian nationalism was at it's peak, ausgleich was both a curse and a blessing as it made slovakia face brutal opression mutliple genocides like (Černová Tragedy) and massive hungariazation and land rape, but it made the hungarians "losers" of the great war even though they didn't exist and the dual monarchy was a shallow compromise that didn't mean anything. The land during the hungarian kingdom period was mostly ruled over by hungarians but also quite a few slovak nobles and monarchs, so cope mongol and get trianoned bozo. womp womp.

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral 2 місяці тому

      So what? Because Hungary conquered Slovakia, banned their language, tried to erase their culture and forcefully settled Hungarians there, Slovakia has now no right to be a nation? Why do you think there are so many Hungarians in Slovakia? Maybe the next time try to look further into history than just few decades back.
      You know why Slovakians were a minority in Hungary (not Hungary, but Uhorsko or "greater Hungary")? Because Hungary was just bigger. By this metric the dutch were a minority in the Spanish empire. Do you think they need to be annexed into Spain?

  • @Arthur-tx8fd
    @Arthur-tx8fd 3 місяці тому +7

    Listening to you is refreshing..you have filled in the blanks for me and I've studied WW2 for 12 years

  • @charmyzard
    @charmyzard 3 місяці тому +2

    Because, if you've played Fuhrerreich, you'd know how much of a pain a third front right next to your heart would be.

  • @mayachico9766
    @mayachico9766 Місяць тому +3

    Reddit AntiFa guys are gonna be in the comments with random criticism.....unfortunately

  • @lukelovett3037
    @lukelovett3037 8 місяців тому +8

    I'm really enjoying the life of hitler series and the great amout of detail you go to in each video.
    I'd like to know about his mental decline towards the final years of the war.
    Thanks for your good work

  • @vizualnihistorie
    @vizualnihistorie 4 місяці тому +16

    Well first of all Hácha wasn't tortured, he was arrested to be judged and died in that prison because of his bad health :( Secondly yes we accepted German overlordship, but not because we wanted it, but because we didn't wanted to get blown to pieces in this helpless situation. Overall Czechoslovakia could have work, otherwise it would have already crumbled before 1939, but it didn't and yes I agree Czechoslovakia should have been done differently.

    • @tomorrowneverdies567
      @tomorrowneverdies567 4 місяці тому +4

      Exactly. As if Czechoslovakia did not work after 1945.

    • @Letsplay222
      @Letsplay222 3 місяці тому +2

      @@tomorrowneverdies567 You mean as a part of the Soviet Union? 🤔

    • @tomorrowneverdies567
      @tomorrowneverdies567 3 місяці тому +5

      @@Letsplay222
      Czechoslovakia was not part of the Soviet Union. 🤔

    • @Letsplay222
      @Letsplay222 3 місяці тому +7

      ​@@tomorrowneverdies567 Sure they weren't, kid. Sure they weren't.

    • @NickB1967
      @NickB1967 3 місяці тому +3

      ​@tomorrowneverdies567 they were part of the Soviet Empire, if not the USSR proper

  • @markg1767
    @markg1767 6 місяців тому +6

    I’ve been watching a lot of your videos lately and they’re very well done, but I’m curious what your source is for saying Churchill was paid to provoke war? I’ve heard that before but I can’t find confirmation anywhere.

    • @ZoomerHistorian
      @ZoomerHistorian  6 місяців тому +19

      He was the main force pushing for war in the UK, there wouldn’t be a single source that would capture all of it, but I’ll make a full life of Winston Churchill video and try to make as much sense of it as is possible in a single video

    • @andrewcoons8060
      @andrewcoons8060 6 місяців тому +14

      David Irving's book Churchill's war

    • @snapjitzy
      @snapjitzy 4 місяці тому

      Irving is a proven liar​@@andrewcoons8060

    • @bnalive5077
      @bnalive5077 4 місяці тому +6

      Rothschilds

    • @fazole
      @fazole 4 місяці тому +2

      Nick Kollerstam covers it.

  • @mauriciomorais7818
    @mauriciomorais7818 8 місяців тому +18

    You do good work Zoomer. It's good to see the younger generations caring about the truth of WW2.
    Your channel is treading the line of what YT considers h8 speech.
    Do not be discouraged by warnings and threats you may get. Keep these vids coming, they are important!

    • @DrJones20
      @DrJones20 8 місяців тому +11

      "The truth" Lol

    • @mauriciomorais7818
      @mauriciomorais7818 8 місяців тому +3

      @@DrJones20 go play videogames, cuck.

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 4 місяці тому +2

      ​@DrJones20 yea "truth" haha

    • @bnalive5077
      @bnalive5077 4 місяці тому

      @@Masaryk28.10., and the Goyem speak again…..

    • @d.k8746
      @d.k8746 2 місяці тому +1

      much closer to the truth than ur ignoramus nonsense for sure

  • @9nniosalier1
    @9nniosalier1 3 місяці тому +20

    On March 15, Czechs went to the snowy streets of Prague, protesting and raising fists at the German convoys. Fists, not salutes. Is that the welcoming you were talking about?

    • @Letsplay222
      @Letsplay222 3 місяці тому +13

      How many Czechs protested out of how many of the total population?

    • @9nniosalier1
      @9nniosalier1 3 місяці тому

      @@Letsplay222 Actively about 30-100 thousand, despite the authorities brutally cracking down on them. And if I take the last free elections into account, at least 2.5 million anti-Nazi voters supported them.

    • @Charles_Anthony
      @Charles_Anthony 3 місяці тому +4

      ​@@9nniosalier1: So, 100,000 out of 14,480,000 people? That's not even one percent of the population.

    • @9nniosalier1
      @9nniosalier1 3 місяці тому

      @@Charles_Anthony First, Protectorate didn't have even half of the population you wrote.
      Second, when did you last see 7 million people demonstrating in the cities under totalitarian regime?

    • @somerandomgadzo4778
      @somerandomgadzo4778 3 місяці тому +3

      @@Charles_Anthony ah yes 14.480.000 people, not even the whole territory of the czech republic TODAY, has that population, what is bro yapping about.

  • @mikebellis5713
    @mikebellis5713 Місяць тому +2

    Waiting for Hess and Mosely with baited breath. Your take on history is like a breath of fresh air. Very different from the indoctrination I have been subjected to since birth

  • @brominelover6747
    @brominelover6747 8 місяців тому +25

    Interesting why no one talks about the demonstration in Prague after Reinhardt's assassination. Very insightful, thank you

    • @what-uy7go
      @what-uy7go 8 місяців тому +30

      Because it's overshadowed by the Czechs who hid the assassins, along with the Lidice massacre.... Do you seriously believe that the average person would have much respect for a foreigner who came to their home to essentially be a colonial administrator?

    • @DrJones20
      @DrJones20 8 місяців тому +17

      @@what-uy7go Hard to reason with nazis

    • @what-uy7go
      @what-uy7go 8 місяців тому +17

      @@DrJones20yeah.

    • @floppypancakes9509
      @floppypancakes9509 6 місяців тому +8

      Just like when North Koreans cry when their leaders die 😂

  • @vilhjj
    @vilhjj 6 місяців тому +4

    General von Stauffenberg?? The " im generalstab" means he was paet of the general staff not a colonel-general he was just a colonel

  • @czthjvv
    @czthjvv 3 місяці тому +5

    My Czech family lived in Prague during WW2. They were deemed "able to Germanized".

    • @dittmannrudolfrohr2149
      @dittmannrudolfrohr2149 3 місяці тому +1

      Re-Germanized?

    • @somerandomgadzo4778
      @somerandomgadzo4778 3 місяці тому +3

      @@dittmannrudolfrohr2149 Hypergerman nationalist when he realises that he is 20% czech

    • @dittmannrudolfrohr2149
      @dittmannrudolfrohr2149 3 місяці тому

      @@somerandomgadzo4778 Maybe they were deemed able to learn the German language.

    • @TheSetkon
      @TheSetkon Місяць тому

      ​@@dittmannrudolfrohr2149
      Hey, I've seen this one in the late 18th century - the deliberate effort to erase the Czech language.
      I can't imagine why any Czech would object to that...

    • @dittmannrudolfrohr2149
      @dittmannrudolfrohr2149 Місяць тому +1

      “The most deplorable crimes committed against Germans in 1945 occurred in Czechoslovakia. What happened here is beyond measure. Over 3,200,000 Sudeten Germans were robbed of all their belongings, around 250,000 were tortured and murdered in unimaginable torment, and 2,814,000 of the survivors were driven out of their homeland. On top of that, around 500,000 German soldiers who surrendered, fleeing Silesians, East Prussians and Pomeranians who tragically moved into Czech territory were swept away into the murderous chaos. The majority of them are still considered missing today.”

  • @jamespasquali7693
    @jamespasquali7693 2 дні тому

    Heydrich referred to the Czechoslovakian workers as "My Czechs". This is been spun, but I truly believe that they loved him overall as he gave them better wages, increased rations & paid vacations.

  • @hidden_truth_margeleT
    @hidden_truth_margeleT 2 місяці тому +7

    Ignore all the IDF accounts and keep up with your excellent work!

    • @ChannelFish279
      @ChannelFish279 6 днів тому

      Also ignore all the people that came from Reddit

    • @ChannelFish279
      @ChannelFish279 6 днів тому

      Reddit users are mostly retarded.

  • @crusader2112
    @crusader2112 8 місяців тому +11

    Great work. Keep it up. 👍
    P.S. Instead of warmonger, I think Warhawk is a better term. No offense.

    • @crusader2112
      @crusader2112 8 місяців тому +6

      @@TommyLegionnaireSantoroNothing really. Warmonger just seems like a loaded word.

    • @matthewexline6589
      @matthewexline6589 5 місяців тому

      I'm personally rather fond of "war whore" myself.

    • @nonono9194
      @nonono9194 4 місяці тому +2

      Constantly calling for sending other men to war and not yourself kinda deserves a loaded connotation, I'd say much worse than monger​@@crusader2112

    • @crusader2112
      @crusader2112 4 місяці тому

      @@nonono9194 fair enough.

  • @SandfordSmythe
    @SandfordSmythe 5 місяців тому +5

    Great Britain was not ready to go to war yet. And there was opposition to European wars after the horrendous loss of men in WWI.

    • @lioneldemun6033
      @lioneldemun6033 3 місяці тому

      The European leaders knew full well war was unavoidable despite the Munich Agreement which was just an attempt to win a little time before the shit hit the fan.

    • @JagdDachshund
      @JagdDachshund 3 місяці тому +3

      Juze did it

    • @PeterLaughton
      @PeterLaughton 2 місяці тому

      Germany and Italy were not at all ready for war yet. They had to recover from the terrible post WWI conditions before they could manufacture anything. England and France were very ready for war and manufactured plenty of weapons after WWI.

  • @jamesmackey1238
    @jamesmackey1238 6 місяців тому +35

    “Rehabilitation of Hitler: The Guy was Controversial.” Alt name for channel.

    • @user-wj6dt5bq3w
      @user-wj6dt5bq3w 3 місяці тому +13

      The name for your channel would be "I just believe what's on the TV, derp, derp."

    • @dpetrov32
      @dpetrov32 3 місяці тому

      @@user-wj6dt5bq3w The name for your channel would be "I'm a pornography addicted incel."

    • @kyekruchoski1457
      @kyekruchoski1457 2 місяці тому

      ​@@user-wj6dt5bq3w yes there are plenty of things exagerated by the allies side to make germany look worse in small certain areas. but who am I gonna choose to believe more. almost every single person in europe after the war. or this random guy on the internet who i have never heard once mention the genocide of the jewish population ,the killing of all the russian people despite talking about what russia did to germany, the killing of disabled people, the killing of anyone who wasnt fully with the third reich and much much more ? though one to choose between these two options

    • @crackshack2
      @crackshack2 2 місяці тому +1

      @@user-wj6dt5bq3wliterally watching Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher and suffering TDS everyday of his life.

    • @sarubet8725
      @sarubet8725 12 днів тому

      ​@@user-wj6dt5bq3w noo my alternative propaganda is better than your mainstream propaganda!!

  • @TheVoices69
    @TheVoices69 2 місяці тому +33

    The Czechs were happy? Are you serious? Ask any Czech who lived at that time how happy he was during the protectorate. Do it.

    • @mayachico9766
      @mayachico9766 Місяць тому +6

      I just did. They told me it was cool

    • @TheVoices69
      @TheVoices69 Місяць тому

      @@mayachico9766 Could you please provide info as to who do you mean with "they"? Otherwise im assuming you just made it up.

    • @mayachico9766
      @mayachico9766 Місяць тому +6

      @@TheVoices69 they said it's cool. Bye

    • @TheVoices69
      @TheVoices69 Місяць тому

      @@mayachico9766 whos "they"?

    • @formalist6096
      @formalist6096 Місяць тому

      @@TheVoices69this teenager won’t tell anyone cause he simply just lied to you bro. Don’t waste your energy on this idiot.

  • @thefirerises9112
    @thefirerises9112 8 місяців тому +32

    Best history channel on YT

  • @tombombadil9123
    @tombombadil9123 5 місяців тому +13

    your source is David Irving? nice one ;)

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 4 місяці тому +6

      Thats not good

    • @snapjitzy
      @snapjitzy 4 місяці тому

      Irving is a proven liar.

    • @fuwa9616
      @fuwa9616 3 місяці тому +14

      @@Masaryk28.10. You mean its not good to have the world's most renown expert on this history before his wrongthink in the 70s?

    • @behoover
      @behoover 3 місяці тому

      @@fuwa9616or because his books beem debunked and he's litterally been prooven a holacaust denier even in court

    • @johannesolofsson221
      @johannesolofsson221 3 місяці тому

      Because he debunks churchill and stalins crazy lies about the war and hitler? ​@@Masaryk28.10.

  • @jebbush2527
    @jebbush2527 3 місяці тому

    I had this question 45 seconds ago then this popped up wtf

  • @ActivateMysticMine
    @ActivateMysticMine 6 місяців тому +7

    I admire this channel’s intended purpose and think that it hits that mark 99% of the time; but something in this video struck a cord with me immediately. Referring to Winston Churchill and company as paid shills I think demonstrates unintended bias. Shill, especially in the context of the English, carries an incredibly negative connotation. Churchill was a man of dubious means as I’m sure we can agree most politicians regardless of era are; but to call him and his likeminded peers paid shills writes them off and doesn’t consider the other very real and extenuating circumstances at the time. People think hysteria based on paranoia or whatever irrational fear is a very modern concept but in reality it’s a phenomenon present throughout time. The English and Germans up to that point didn’t have exactly the best track record for foreign relations and ideology predicated on someone’s race or national origin was much more prominent at the time so that bad blood had harbored as a result of a prior world war and eventual colonial ambitions of Germany overlapping with Britain’s. In summary I just find the diction choice to be poor and reflective of an unfair characterization of people who were merely victims of the time/circumstance not all too dissimilar to Prime Minister Chamberlain himself when it comes to how he’s perceived in the modern realm of academia.

    • @againsttheleftandright4065
      @againsttheleftandright4065 6 місяців тому +12

      This is like asking for someone to be called a "war hawk" rather than a "war monger." Churchill was not just another politician. It may seem normal for politicians to be paid to advance certain agendas by shadowy groups today, but that is not what a politician does by definition.

    • @ActivateMysticMine
      @ActivateMysticMine 6 місяців тому +2

      @@againsttheleftandright4065 even for the time that seems pretty on-brand and to scale accurately. I feel like that’s an apt assumption to make of most or all politicians after the enlightenment era/Industrial Revolution.

    • @againsttheleftandright4065
      @againsttheleftandright4065 6 місяців тому +9

      @@ActivateMysticMine
      All politicians have their backers. The difference is, men like Hitler had agendas and supporters. Men like Churchill had supporters first which set the agenda. For example, I don't believe that Churchill liked the USSR. I think there is evidence he hated them. But, Churchill's agenda-setters were firmly in favor of Anglo-Soviet cooperation against Germany. So, ultimately, the peoples of Eastern Europe, the Czech, the Poles, the Lithuanians, were all stabbed in the back by the British and Americans.
      I did some of my own research on the Czech military. It disturbed me how many of their war heroes and generals ended up dying in Soviet gulags despite being "liberated" from German occupation.

    • @ActivateMysticMine
      @ActivateMysticMine 6 місяців тому +1

      @@againsttheleftandright4065 I’m not trying to divert the discussion but did you really believe to to the contrary? Not trying to come off pompous or all-knowing but it’s pretty well known and commonly accepted in all that I was taught that the Soviets while fighting for the allies committed MANY war crimes themselves while also waging an eerily similar geo political conquest that wasn’t all too dissimilar to Germany leading up to 1941.

    • @againsttheleftandright4065
      @againsttheleftandright4065 6 місяців тому +6

      @@ActivateMysticMine
      I don't understand what you are asking here. Believe what? Yes, the USSR was worse.
      Also, the conquests of the USSR are not similar to Germany. 1) because the USSR conquered bordering nations purely for strategic military and economic objectives, while Germany did so primarily due to the region's ties to Germany and secondarily for national security, and 2) the USSR initiated it's conquests while Germany was mainly reactionary.

  • @daveweiss5647
    @daveweiss5647 8 місяців тому +4

    Great video! Real history without the propaganda! Thanks!

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 4 місяці тому +2

      He is literally saying nazi propaganda

  • @qefucan7591
    @qefucan7591 8 місяців тому +3

    Great work man, keep em comin!

  • @SmolShibez
    @SmolShibez 2 місяці тому +1

    its called oversimplified for an obvious reason but yeah ur right

  • @wisentwisent9150
    @wisentwisent9150 6 місяців тому +1

    Another excellent presentation, and the maps help immensely.

  • @alisharispoli2996
    @alisharispoli2996 4 місяці тому +4

    I honestly think Zoomer Historian has the highest quality documentaries in the game.

  • @laf43777
    @laf43777 3 місяці тому +3

    Great video

  • @big_diesel_92
    @big_diesel_92 Місяць тому +1

    Amazing channel

  • @GhostofJamesMadison
    @GhostofJamesMadison 3 місяці тому +3

    Im so surprised your sllowed to just tell the real history of ww2 this whole channel is wild

    • @nicholasgutierrez9940
      @nicholasgutierrez9940 Місяць тому +1

      Years back there were tons of videos like these. Even some about the true background of colonies like Rhodesia and the Belgian Congo. They all got nuked sadly

  • @maxek9417
    @maxek9417 3 місяці тому +13

    The simping of this guy for Hitler is crazy. I quote "Reinhard Heydrich, protector of Bohemia was so loved by Czechs" - This is gonna be most ironic sentence ever. Assassination of Heydrich was suggested by Czechoslovak Government in Exile and it was named "Operation Anthropoid", exiled government intentions to asssinate this guy was to null Munich Agreement from 1938, because Allies saw the 1939 invasion of Czechoslovakia as Czech unwillingness to resist any foreign invader. Exiled government was well aware Allies had no intentions of returning Sudetenland to Czechoslovakia after the war, as it was separate agreement prior to war. When the Operation Anthropoid was executed and Czech paratroopers were dropped in Protectorate, they had arranged meeting with local Czech resistance leaders, when the Czech paratroopers explained their main reason for being present in Protectorate, Czech resistance leaders tried to stop them as they knew assassinating Heydrich would bring an end to lives of thousands of Czechs in protectorate, because Heydrich was known for his brutality and repressions towards the Czech population, he was even nicknamed "Butcher of Prague" for his actions done prior to the operation. I have seen video about your active pro-Nazi stance in your videos made by What Why How, I recommend others to watch it to get better knowings about this guy calling himself "Zoomer Historian".

    • @fuwa9616
      @fuwa9616 3 місяці тому +2

      Once again, the Westerners think a neutral factual view of the man is somehow simping. No, you are the ones that have been ingrained to think a certain way, known as the "western rewritten consensus" established in 1950s.

    • @fuwa9616
      @fuwa9616 3 місяці тому +11

      I also notice you conflate one man's action with the entire country. I have read and heard about the ideas that many men in countries like Czechoslovakia, the UK and the USA, plans for what to be done to the Japanese population. If you are gonna use one man to judge a country, then we can easily use one man to judge that the Czechs were not innocent.

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral 3 місяці тому +2

      ​​@@fuwa9616
      One mans actions. Heydrich ordered it but hundreds of ss soldiers did it and those people who Heydrich answered to aprooved of these actions. If they hadnt aprooved of those actions Heydrich would have been removed and arrested.
      And the people he answered to were the most powerfull people in Germany.

    • @maxek9417
      @maxek9417 3 місяці тому +1

      @@fuwa9616 No one is innocent, in every single country Germans occupied throughout the war, collaborators existed. I am not judging one man's actions, I am judging the insane pro-Nazi romanticized version of what happened in Czechoslovakia prior and during the war.

    • @WillyOrca
      @WillyOrca 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@maxek9417its weird that the "pro-nazi" narrative makes WAY more sense than the narrative we're taught in school. (Evil NAZI Mustache man driven by irrational hatred and madness convinces millions of relatively intelligent/educated people that a completely innocent religious minority was to blame for all of their problems based purely on superstition)

  • @LegendofNelda
    @LegendofNelda 5 місяців тому +8

    Amazing quality, I'm surprised such a high quality, unbiased documentary is widely availale. And made by a zoomer, excellent.

  • @lupettoversilia
    @lupettoversilia 8 місяців тому

    👍🏻

  • @CraftKiller-tv7gb
    @CraftKiller-tv7gb 4 місяці тому +27

    You somehow "forgot" to mention the villages Lidice and Ležáky, which were burnt to ground by the Germans as revenge for the assassination of Heidrich, all the men were murdered and women and children dragged to concentration camp. After the assassination thousands of other innocent Czechs were arrested, tortured and killed.
    Our resistance was significant. The actual reason why Heidrich was put into his place in the protectorate, was to destroy the Czechs resistance, which he managed by torturing and murdering those, who were trying oppose the Germans and rewarding collaborators.
    I acknowledge that our resistance was not much compared to the one in France or the USSR, but those soldiers, who killed Heidrich were actually Czech, our resistance fighters also attempted an assassination of Himmler.
    Hitler murdered millions upon millions of people, you may be stating some facts, but you knowingly ignore most of them just tu suit your questionable opinions.

    • @citizenfoffie7605
      @citizenfoffie7605 3 місяці тому +4

      Lidice and Ležáky were the landign zones of allied paratroopers in that operation, if there is resistance activity in the middle of a war, it's going to get treated as a war zone.

    • @CraftKiller-tv7gb
      @CraftKiller-tv7gb 3 місяці тому +4

      @@citizenfoffie7605 I am not even going to answer that. You are fine with war crimes, genocide and child murder. Everyone over the age of 15 was shot there, the rest gassed in concentration camps or readucated in German families. If you are fine with something like that happening, i have nothing else to tell you.

    • @GovernorAdmiral
      @GovernorAdmiral 3 місяці тому +12

      ​​​@@citizenfoffie7605
      So you are saying that by paradroping someone into an enemy city I give the enemy the right to slaughter the whole civilian population?
      Because thats what happend.
      That shouldnt happen even if it was a warzone.

    • @Letsplay222
      @Letsplay222 3 місяці тому +6

      If your resistance was less than the one in France, then you didn't have much of a resistance at all.

    • @Sp00nexe
      @Sp00nexe 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Letsplay222I have bad news for you about the myth of the French resistance

  • @stalingaming9304
    @stalingaming9304 8 місяців тому +17

    Tedor? Buchanan? IRVING??? You are very brave. Not incorrect, just brave,

    • @colonelsmith7757
      @colonelsmith7757 7 місяців тому +21

      Irving is a giant

    • @elliotstamler1244
      @elliotstamler1244 5 місяців тому

      Like nazis, do you?@@colonelsmith7757

    • @alanywalany6460
      @alanywalany6460 3 місяці тому +2

      @@colonelsmith7757 A giant failure

    • @d.k8746
      @d.k8746 2 місяці тому +4

      alany dont talk ignoramus nonsense. theres a thing called books. open them.

    • @alanywalany6460
      @alanywalany6460 2 місяці тому +1

      @@d.k8746 Why would I open a giant failure and a proven liar and fabricators books?

  • @mrmackey8776
    @mrmackey8776 5 місяців тому +18

    glad someone is actually doing research and not just regurgitating 80 year old Allied propaganda

  • @SenorTucano
    @SenorTucano 8 місяців тому +2

    Fascinating

  • @Charles_Anthony
    @Charles_Anthony 3 місяці тому +2

    Versailles was nothing compared to Trianon.

  • @behoover
    @behoover 3 місяці тому +25

    "We hated the germans so much, we even hated the german language"zdena nemcova . Your claim that the czechs liked yhe occupation is comedic

  • @animefarts1488
    @animefarts1488 8 місяців тому +3

    I've been interested in these things for years and most of your content is familiar to me but I've genuinely heard some new things here, its good work. Waiting for that Ryangosling czech nationalist guy to show up and spout some nonsense

    • @jankalivoda1196
      @jankalivoda1196 8 місяців тому +4

      I nearly was that Guy :D then i drived into some history books, look on internet And yep, no lies there, its hard to not be biased, but truth is truht And we cannot change it

  • @bassault
    @bassault 2 місяці тому

    Isn't this when the German army got their hands on the Panzer 38t?

  • @sipek9488
    @sipek9488 6 місяців тому +1

    real

  • @behoover
    @behoover 3 місяці тому +9

    My guy you cant use entire books as sources. That disingenuous i have to take everything you say with a grain of salt since i cant verify it without buying and reading through the entirety of the book. Please atleast add pages numbers if you are going to use books as sources.

    • @behoover
      @behoover 3 місяці тому +1

      Another thing worth mentioning is that there can be difficulty in verifying the authenticity of these books . I mean youre using david irvings book as a source . The same guy who denied the holocaust. We cannnot as viewers verify the validity of the books since some of these books lack the original proof of where they got the information from

    • @behoover
      @behoover 3 місяці тому +1

      A final thing to note you when you quoted hitler on the liquidation of the czech state if they should peruse an ant german policy . Then you go on to show how this isnt an act of aggression by quoting AJP taylor. But the problem is that is an opinion. Thats how you and taylor interpreted it. The majority of people would likely interpret that differently and as a clear act of agression

    • @tylercollinsworth9075
      @tylercollinsworth9075 3 місяці тому +5

      If everything he said comformed with the narrative, you wouldn't be questioning its authenticity

    • @behoover
      @behoover 3 місяці тому

      @@tylercollinsworth9075 I wouldnt since it has been verified and not disproven

    • @behoover
      @behoover 3 місяці тому

      @@tylercollinsworth9075 The type of arguemnts hes providing in this vid are very subjective which he is doing on purpose

  • @GleppaPigg
    @GleppaPigg 8 місяців тому +4

    Do you have any thought towards making a series of videos about the history of the ongoing Israel Palestine conflict?
    Having to sift through an endless sea of lies to find one sole gem is tiring, and you are a great narrator, unbiased and thorough.

  • @peterkogler9502
    @peterkogler9502 3 місяці тому

    Thanks!

  • @user-mt8xk5zz7b
    @user-mt8xk5zz7b 27 днів тому

    Didn't Poland and Hitler make a decision to split Czechoslovakia between them?

  • @BorrisBar-iq7rp
    @BorrisBar-iq7rp 7 місяців тому +18

    I was born in Czech and came to Australia as a child .. my grandma who lived through the war said the Germans were good guys overall..and she prayed they would defeat the Russians which she said were nothing more then swine.. she used to feed German soldiers during the war and said they were gentlemen.. her home was in a village close to the German border .. we have Austrian and German blood too as well as Czech and Slovak

    • @josfol
      @josfol 6 місяців тому +2

      Germans were good guys overall? Give me a break. You are a total idiot. Germans caused death of over 55 millions of Europeans and laid the whole Europe in ruins during the WWII. You really mean it was good?

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 4 місяці тому

      Your grandma was a bitch i will say that supporting occupation its like if someone supported soviets in 1968

  • @CraftKiller-tv7gb
    @CraftKiller-tv7gb 4 місяці тому +24

    The rest of you guys, after I've read your comments, i was utterly sickened. Sitting here neck deep in your nazi fantasies, believing everything this guy tells you, trying to ignore all the oppression, torture, deportation, murder and genocide, and agreeing with the invalid reasons MY country was invaded for. This guy may be stating some facts, i am not denying that, but all he says is specifically chosen to suit HIS opinions, while putting aside key facts, like the Czech resistance during the occupation, or the destruction of the villages Lidice and Ležáky. Do your own research, look yourself into the horrors the Nazis did in my country then come back and tell me what you think!

    • @KrokLP
      @KrokLP 3 місяці тому +13

      Oh sorry the image of your wonderful country was sullied. Since you say the pretext and story about Czech oppression before occupation are all wrong, can you instead tell me about Benes "Final Solution of the German Question"? Or what happened to 3 million Germans, 20% of Czechoslovakia?

    • @Letsplay222
      @Letsplay222 3 місяці тому +3

      Well, it is impossible to know the true minds of millions of people 90 years ago. All we can go off of is actions. Just like France likes to pretend that they heroically resisted the German occupation during WW2, the facts seem to indicate a very different story...most didn't resist either out of ideological agreement or just practical self-interest. However, I think the main point of the video isn't that "The Czechs liked Hitler" so much as it is that Hitler wasn't out to "conquer the world" like most historical narratives state, but rather he merely responded to opportunity and a power vacuum.

    • @CraftKiller-tv7gb
      @CraftKiller-tv7gb 3 місяці тому +1

      @@KrokLP You mean the mass post war deportation? I am not defending that. That was a cruel unreasonable thing to do and yes, it was Beneš's fault. In his defence the idea was greatly influenced by the soviets, who "liberated" us. And Beneš at this point was more or less a soviet puppet.

    • @KrokLP
      @KrokLP 3 місяці тому +3

      @@CraftKiller-tv7gb An example. One train full of families, around 200 deportees, from Slovakia in 1946 was stopped in Moravia. There were no fighting-age men on board. Women, children, elderly. The Czech corporal in charge marched them away from the train station where he started having everyone shot, starting with the eldest, following "natural order" as parents should not out-live their children. When asked by higher-ups later why he shot the children he asked what use the orphaned parasites had. He was never charged with anything and probably enjoyed a long life and nice Czech army pension.

    • @CraftKiller-tv7gb
      @CraftKiller-tv7gb 3 місяці тому

      @@KrokLP Could you share the source please?

  • @temperedtemplar1368
    @temperedtemplar1368 8 місяців тому +1

    I like that you make videos about things people do not talk about very much I would like to see a video of yours on Hitler's alliance with Japan or something outside of Europe would you ever do anything like that?

    • @ZoomerHistorian
      @ZoomerHistorian  8 місяців тому +4

      Yeah it’s just that Japan isn’t my strong suit, mostly because of the lack of books on the topic in comparison to the European theater, but I would like to make them. If it’s possible I will

  • @karoltomis5704
    @karoltomis5704 3 місяці тому +1

    Háša, Hradkany, Njurat... Kein Kommentar.
    Greetings from Pressburg/Pozsonyi

  • @easterworshipper730
    @easterworshipper730 8 місяців тому +8

    Just a little observation.
    Can you put the names of people you are talking about.
    Great work as always, do you know the mexican writer Salvador Borrego ?
    He wrote a book in 1953 called derrota mundia (global defeat) in the book he explain almost identicly as your videos, but he was an anticommunist so he put the atention into soviet union and german anticomnunism.

  • @Normal_macdonald
    @Normal_macdonald 8 місяців тому +3

    Sneedful

  • @SpeculativeSpeculator
    @SpeculativeSpeculator 4 місяці тому +2

    BASEDD

  • @martinqwerty8990
    @martinqwerty8990 Місяць тому +1

    Remaining czech state was dangerous to 3 reich 😂
    They would occupy country 20 times bigger ❤

  • @bananomet4052
    @bananomet4052 4 місяці тому +7

    Work on your pronunciation mate.
    Not Sudeytnland, but Soodehtenland
    Not Benes, but Benesh
    Not Hasha, but Haakha
    Not Hradikani castle, but Hratschaneh castle.

  • @TheReformerK
    @TheReformerK 8 місяців тому +9

    can you do a video on the history of the 12th ss?

  • @antoniotorcoli5740
    @antoniotorcoli5740 3 місяці тому +1

    Because they let him do it

  • @Asdasxel
    @Asdasxel 2 місяці тому +1

    So according to you Reinhard Heydrich was beloved by the local population and brought the Czech people never-before-seen prosperity? I guess that's why the Czechoslovaks assassinated him and the populace helped the paratroopers in every way they could.
    And the part about Hitler needing to invade the Czech lands to prevent "chaos"? What about not invading a killing those 100 000 people? BTW real numbers are higher, I would be interested in how Zoomer Historian got those "less than 100 000 Czechs". The video didn't actually bring up a single good reason for the invasion of the rest of Czechoslovakia. I'm sorry but "unclear future" is not a reason for invasion. Even for mr. Hitler.

  • @realcheez795
    @realcheez795 22 дні тому +4

    Brother "there was a serious chance of Polish-Czech invasion of Germany" is the biggest joke i ever heard, almost more hilarious than your attempt to convey that this channel is unbiased. Got me rolling hard. I am Czech and have personally studied our dated archived documents from exactly this era for years. This video is honestly hot garbage which makes me reconsider the legitimacy of your other videos i have in fact kind of enjoyed. Those years of oppression and German occuptaion destroyed all of our defense mechanisms, military, welfare and industry thus literally buttering us up for the SSSR which finished the job in crippling our country for decades. You can say anything about intentions, it ended up as a damn disaster though.

    • @realcheez795
      @realcheez795 21 день тому +2

      Also, i forgot to state that the sole reason for Slovaks not taking a big part in ČSR's decisionmaking at the time was that they were quite literally HARD CARRIED by our developed economy. It might have been empathy and etnic vicinity amongst the population (together with personal efforts of TGM, Beneš and others) which resulted in the creation of a single state. Nonetheless, in the end we were heavily betrayed by those whom we concidered our brothers.

    • @sarubet8725
      @sarubet8725 12 днів тому +1

      Funny "this channel was good until it dissed to my country" logic

    • @realcheez795
      @realcheez795 12 днів тому +1

      @@sarubet8725 because unlike the other videos, i actually studied the concrete facts on the history of my country so i finally saw the disconnect. If you dont understand that, you have black mold on the brain lil bro

  • @Nomansland77
    @Nomansland77 4 місяці тому +3

    I"m thoroughly impressed with your videos dude, keep it up, earned a subscriber.

  • @ChannelFish279
    @ChannelFish279 6 днів тому

    Great video!

  •  Місяць тому

    One thing I don’t understand about these UA-camrs history videos is why is it so hard to educate themselves how to pronounce names of people and cities etc. There was no president Hasha, his name was pronounced Hakha. There is no president Benes but properly pronounced Benesh etc. Hradcany castle is pronounced properly Hradchany Castle

  • @rapramix
    @rapramix 6 місяців тому +12

    Pat Buchanan and David Irving as sources?!?

    • @elliotstamler1244
      @elliotstamler1244 5 місяців тому +4

      These two fit in beautifully with some of these commenters herein such as Andrew Barry.

    • @Masaryk28.10.
      @Masaryk28.10. 4 місяці тому +11

      Yea what did you expect from someone playing hearts of iron 4

  • @chadczternastek
    @chadczternastek 7 місяців тому +4

    Extraordinary job on this story, as well as all your content. Truth is often obscured in history and the real story is not what we all thought. You do a great job shedding light of truth to history. I remember being in school learning the story we think is the truth.
    I would love to hear the real truth in exactly how the Germans re-arned themselves over the years in direct opposition of the Treaty Of Versailles. It's often stated the higher ranking generals of the Army were not Hitler fans and it can't be as easy as Hitler going against the grain. There had to been a bigger story, cause it needed a lot of co-operation of people going against the addition of a navy, the U-Boats and the evolution of them has to be a stand alone video. The Germans always been masters of mass organization, and needed a LOT of secrecy. Only thing I really seen or read was that they had bases in the USSR to develop their air force, as well as using neutral countries like Switzerland and The Netherlands as a front for their successful armament.

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 5 місяців тому +1

      If they were masters of organisation how come German logistics were such a complete and utter shambles?

    • @chrisd4112
      @chrisd4112 4 місяці тому

      Once England's navy blocked the ports Germany had no way of getting fuel.
      Germany is in a terrible location when it comes to natural resources. That's the main reason they lost.

  • @blackstonewielder19
    @blackstonewielder19 3 місяці тому +2

    Could you point me to any sources proving the Poles were planning to grab Ostrava?

    • @TomasFunes-rt8rd
      @TomasFunes-rt8rd 3 місяці тому +5

      You do realise that Poland ACTUALLY DID invade Czechoslovakia with their non-aggression pact partner Hitler, and ACTUALLY DID grab Teschen Province...? ( And they squealed like stuck pigs when it was THEIR TURN to get the same treatment in September 1939 !! )

    • @kanga-ross
      @kanga-ross Місяць тому

      @@TomasFunes-rt8rd They didnt went for Ostrava. This channel is biased for Nazi Germany and work with fabrications.

    • @blackstonewielder19
      @blackstonewielder19 Місяць тому

      @@TomasFunes-rt8rd I'm not asking about Teschen, but Ostrava

    • @TomasFunes-rt8rd
      @TomasFunes-rt8rd Місяць тому

      @@blackstonewielder19 Deal with the new knowledge anyway !

  • @justingiannace3577
    @justingiannace3577 8 місяців тому +2

    Pardon my tardiness... Another banger.