As a Slovak myself, I can say that for us Slovaks Czech republic and Czech language are not considered foreign. In fact, half of the shows shown in TV are in Czech, games sold in our region are localized in Czech, and many people prefer Czech translation in many books. If a Slovak person wrote "Czech" among foreign languages in their CV, they would get funny faces because of that. We can even study in Czech republic and the tuition bill will be footed by Slovak government! Bratia navždy!
@@rickfrombohemia9550 I was thinking maybe Belgium and the Netherlands. Tho the Flemish and Dutch are basically the same which with close to 0 cultural and linguistic differences.
Honestly I'm impressed by the brotherly love between the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Peaceful separation is amazingly rare in history and to remain close following the separation is amazing
Fight between us is like between you brother who live next door and go on daily basis borrow milk from you and you visit him for talk, beer and cigarette. All together we are 15-16 million of people who do not get a damn about others until they mess with us. Both nations were oppressed and like to live in peace. Nicely watch to the valleys in the sunset full of beer and cannabis 🎉
Not every divorce ends with the spouse are flinging plates at each other, breaking their things by throw out a window of flat, wrangling over property and fighting over the children in court. Sometimes ex-spouses remain friends who are happy to help each other in their life.
@@petervlcko4858 tak neviem ci si taky mlady, zaciatkom 90tych to bolo huste Cesi pesi do Prahy, Havel v podstate nemohol verejne vystupit na SVK, aby nedostal vajcom … veci sa upravili az par rokov po prevrate
I am a Hungarian and despite all historical troubles between Hungarians and Slovakian/Czech people, every time I travel to Slovakia or Czech Republic it really stuns me how similar we are. The dishes, the fashion, the architecture, the general customs of people is so similar, even if we speak completely different languages. It seems logical from a historical perspective, but it is really eye opening after so many hate, wars and supression on each other. I really respect Czech and Slovakian people and I wish we had some similar brother nations like theirs.
@@SFjunior the funny thing is, you are Slovakian and your family name in Hungarian means "potmaker, potter". I am a Hungarian, and my name literally means "Croatian". Some heritages are just interesting.
Slovak/Hungarian relationship is one of the biggest missed opportunities for brotherly relationship. We lived for centuries side by side, only to be divided by the turmoils of 19th century nationalism. But hey, we all are part of the Central European family of nations. There is really no "Hungarian isolation".
I remember first time visiting Budapest and thinking its basically the same as Prague. Heck the two cities even have a castle in almost the same spot lol.
@briansedlacek1963 Learning more about the history of Nations that became Countries and beaten back into States holds a large category. Fear not for it is the individual, their perspective and amount of BS they will palletize under the guise of a flag that has and will decide the pages as they continue to turn.
When it’s this peaceful, this mutual and were not long unified as one, I do agree separate and not collapse. Collapse to me means violent or where one side was trying to force the other the stay.
The Czechs and Slovaks looked at one another. Shrugged. And then the country fell apart. Honestly it's about as well as something like this can possibly go.
Czech republic is more of a slavic nation with lot of germanic influence. Due to lot of ethnic german living there due to its history. It was part of austrian empire as a recent example Prague was even a sort of bilingual german-czech city during austro-hungarian. German being the elite language While slovakia is more of pure slavic nation more similar to poland/yogoslavia/russia. Since a lot less ethnic german lived there. And it was a very rural country. So less german elites and german industries settled there
@@mathewvanostin7118 Bratislava wasn't that much different from Prague when it came to languages. It was probably divided into nearly perfect thirds - slovakian, german (austrian) and hungarian. And the rest of the country was also full of german-speaking or hungarian-speaking peoples. But yes, the national movements of WW1 and communist movements of WW2 quickly get rid of both germans and hungarians.
@@mathewvanostin7118 sounds like czech is west germany, slovakia east germany (perhaps not culturally but by industries... west got all industry, east farming).
@@MrLeedebt With the EU, Schengen and the Euro, what's really changed other than both groups getting their own space. If anything it might have made their relations BETTER
I have met several Czeck and Slovak people and when I asked them why their countries split, they all told me: "I don't know; the politicians..." One girl even told me: "my stepfather became a foreigner over night" 🤷🏻♀️
We couldn't reach an agreement about how the federation would look like, so we splitted before it would harm our state and our relations. Considering how wild the 90s were, it was probably the best choice.
Slovak populist nationalists spread the "Czechs are only holding us back on purpose and don't want us to succeed" narrative for winning the elections, similar to Trump and Putin agenda
Well it all was just a power play of power hungery politicians that partitioned and destroied big portions of indurstrial welth. (Opinion shared by 80% people i knou
Actually it was a super secret plot by Canada 🇨🇦 to weaken the Czechoslovakian National hockey team by splitting it in two and we succeeded beautifully 😀😃😄😁😆😅🤣
Czech here. I think the separation actually helped both nations as we could get more autonomy (more important to Slovaks I believe) and yet treat the other ones with respect and cooperate better.
@@petrskalak5070 Can we blame Slovaks for being bitter? The only reason we had communism in Slovakia was because the communist party won in the Czech part of the country, but not on the Slovak side, so we ended up with communism ''tanks'' to our Czech brothers (there were twice as many Czech voters). I think that was one of the reasons why Slovaks wanted to go their separate way and I think it was beneficial for both countries.
I'm Czech and I would like to thank for this video as well for so many nice comments here. Very often it seemed to me our history doesn't matter to the rest of the world, but now I can see how much I was wrong.
I don't know a lot about Czech's History, but clearly it does matter. I mean, your place in the HRE was significant and that's not something we should discard. The Slovaks, however (and I'm sorry to say this), their history have not the same weight. Still, I'm pretty sure there is some cool stuff about the Slovak's History, but I don't know it.
@Tenval Mestr Czech history isn't as complicated as Slovak history. Slovaks were occupied by Hungarians for centuries. Slovaks were not even allowed to use/teach their native language because of Hungarian rule, but then Bratislava was a coronation city for the Hungarian kingdom, so it wasn't as boring as some people think. Hungarians built a lot of beautiful chateaus and manor houses in Slovakia. We've been fighting together against Ottomans for centuries (Czechs were lucky enough to avoid Turkish attacks), but Ottomans also built a beautiful SPA in Trencianske Teplice. There are several examples of foreign influences in Slovakia which in my view makes the country more interesting but it also shows how different Slovakia is to Czech Republic. In Czechia, pretty much everything is Czech, Slovakia is way more diverse than many people realise
@@vkdrk Don't get me wrong, I didn't mean it as an insult. I am myself from an "unknown" people (Bretons). It's just that our people weren't the ones who wrote History, it doesn't mean we had no influence on it and no culture to show. After all, Slovakia was in the middle of Poland, the HRE, Hungary, Russia, the Ottoman Empire, ... so I have no doubt about the diversity in Slovakia !
As an American I see that the 2 peoples of the area didn't want to live in the same house together, but just wanted to be good neighbors instead. No drama, no nothing, but can still hang out together when they want. Nothing fell apart, just kind of went their own ways, but not too far away.😊
We wanted to live in the same house,even if it meant more independence for Slovaks and refendum wouldn´t pass,but once again policitians ignored will of the people...
@@tefky7964 That's not the only place where politicians ignore the population.... My bet is that every politician of any country and nation does that and never do what's right for everyone, they do what's better for themselves and only take action if pressured or charged, at least that's what happens in third world countries.
The reason for separation was all about the money from privatisation. Getting rid of Czechs was the only way to ensure more influece. The argument of Slovak nationalism was the only thing what could mrs Mečiar and his post communists come up with to destroy this state.
@@yuukiyoshizawa7007 the struggle to ensure individual leaders accurately interpret the will of their people seems to be an age old human story regardless of time or governmental type, with the recurring result being the more power individuals get without equal accountability by law, the more things go off the rails. I would consider Czechoslovakia to not have been a failure in breaking up considering how peaceful and cooperative even that was. If it were my country, it would have started because someone figured out how to make money off the split, these people would then rile up a certain section of the populace that gets real angry over anything the TV says to, and someone would definitely get hurt before everything was through, probably no civil war, but it wouldn’t be Czechoslovakia’s “okay, that can be your half, and this mine” and the borders of this new entity would be a snaking nightmare of wealth inequality with an undertone of racism.
I’m an Italian citizen born in Brazil, there is, two citizenships. I went three times to Czech Republic and love all I saw there. It is the kind of place Everyone should choose to live after retiring. My prefered place to live is Visehrad. Even if I did not go yet to Slovakia, I believe that is the same as Czech Republic. Long and peaceful life to the entire people of the two countries. And enjoy the best beer in the world, Pilsen Urquel.
Im Czech and I was in Brasilia, ist nice place, lots of joyful people around, many friendly faces, wish there is not that much corruption, Florianopolis seemd like a nice place to live.
Im Czech btw It wasnt collapse it was the most peaceful split. There was no animosity. It was just that we decided to part ways but we are still super close.
Czech-American, and I also came here to object to the word "collapse". The split followed accepted political procedures with comparatively minimal conflict , and everything worked out fine.
@@lfilm3 We have what you could call friendly rivalry. Also Slovaks didnt like that during Czechoslovakia years Prague was the capital and not Bratislava.
To all the Czechs and Slovaks, you guys have established a good example of peaceful separation. On the other hand, look at the things that happened in Yugoslavia, we saw how brutal and bloody a breakup could be.
They had religion problems down there in Yugoslavia, thankfully, it was totaly different situation than in mostly atheist Czechoslovakia. But religion is also what makes a difference between Czechs and Slovaks, you barely find a religious person in Czechia, but it's considered standard to be a catholic in Slovakia. They have their "classic christian values" nazis and most of Slovaks support that, while Czechia is liberal atheist country, which is massive cultural difference.
@@Pidalin Slovakia is a Christian country...well, only 50 - 60% of Slovaks are religious and the % of people who actively practice religion is even lower. Spain, Greece, Poland etc. are far more religious than Slovakia. Slovaks don't take religion that seriously. Czech republic is an atheist communist country. We had communism in Czechoslovakia ''thanks'' to our Czech voters...communist parties did not win in Slovakia but because there were more Czech than Slovak voters...we ended up with communism
@@vkdrk Communist parties didn't win in the Czech part either. But they did gain enough government clout to push a violent coup (hint: oppose openly violent opposition from gaining direct control of the instruments of violence in a state if you want to avoid that fate). It's all rather complicated, just like the religiousness. There's plenty of people who identify as Christian, quite similar to Slovakia really; but it's not generally considered something you share publicly. It's considered a private matter. Though disturbingly, little fish symbols on cars have started appearing at an alarming rate, so that might be changing again. The power of the Christian voters also seems to be increasing, with significant strength behind "traditionalist" (=Christian) laws being pushed. It's going to be an interesting century for sure.
@Ondřej Matějka That's a very oversimplified explanation. Moravians have been more religious than Czechs. Slovaks are often religious. In all parts of ČSFR, catholicism was the dominant religion and it also used to strongly influence our cultures. Czechs are liberal rather in the sense that they don't care what other people do. As a result, religion is not something people would fight over in Czechia or Slovakia. A fun fact: at least 4 of 5 leaders of the current Czech governmental parties are religious.
Some important notes that should be included: The first Czechoslovak republic created a notion of common Czechoslovak nationality because there were more Germans than Slovaks in the new state. When it comes to communism, it was much more popular in what is now Czechia than Slovakia which put a strain on the relation. During Prague Spring, Husák was originally a supporter of the reform, but changed sides when Dubček refused to federalize the republic. After 1968, a federal structure was created, comprised of the Slovak and Czech Socialist Republics. The half-million protest was not at Wenceslas Square but at the Letná Plain (though it began at the square). You can't fit that many people there. Slovaks had to fight much harder for their survival as a nation and thus were more nationalistic. In the early 90s, the leading political party in Czechia was based on economic issues, but the main Slovak political party was based on nationalism. The Czechs, led by Klaus, wanted a unitary state or a tight federation. While Slovaks, led by Mečiar, wanted a loose confederation. That was the main issue Czechoslovakia split on.
Agree ... It's quite accurate ... Czechs basically didn't care much and did not understand Slovak's nationalism ... Guess, we've already passed the period of self-determination during 1918. But I think that if we wouldn't split, there would be much more conflicts later ... It was political only (no referendum in Slovakia) but I don't think there was other solution acceptable for political parties on both side ...
Very informative. This seems like the real story of the dissolution of Czechoslovakia. I wonder if there weren't additional reasons, like different historical paths that led to different attitudes. I guess Bohemia was very rich and industrialized even from the Middle Ages, while Slovakia was I think much more rural historically. Recently I saw statistics showing that far more Slovaks consider themselves Christians while most Czechs consider themselves areligious. I also wonder whether the crushing of the Hussite rebellion led to some religious differences between the two regions, given that Catholicism was in part imposed on Bohemia. Is Slovakian Catholicism at all influenced by Orthodoxy? And what about the lost Czechoslovaks, the Transcarpathians? They were made into Ukrainians after WWII.
@@therealspeedwagon1451 I'm not sure about the rationales from Stalin's perspective. It is true that linguistically the Rusyns speak a Slavic language considered to be Eastern Slavic and many other Rusyns lived inside pre-war Poland too, on the other side of the Carpathians (the part of Poland was incorporated into Soviet Ukraine as well). The people of Transcarpathia also tend to be Eastern Orthodox, more so than others in western Ukraine, so from a cultural standpoint combining this territory with Ukraine/Russia made some sense. It's also true that Rusyns of Transcarpathia were not sure what to do after WWI when both Austria-Hungary and Hungary collapsed into ethnic states. Independence wasn't feasible. So apparently 2/3 of the Rusyns voted to join Czechoslovakia. I would love to hear Knowledgia handle this.
When you break with your ex but there was no break up drama because both wanted different paths, but you still like her and like to hang out with her occasionally
The problem with you analogy is briefly mentioned in the video at around 7:50. It was a political and not a popular decision. If it was given as a referendum question, it would have never passed and we would have Czechoslovakia to this day. So if you want your analogy to work, it should be something like "parents of the young couple decided that they are not good for each other so with tears on both sides they parted but stayed friends". To be fair - there was a part of a population that wanted the split - in Slovakia mostly because of nationalist tendencies and feelings their voice is not strong enough in the federation, but some also in Czechia, because they felt that they are pulling Slovakia (funds were flowing more from west to east).
Back in 2010 I met a young Slovak woman. I asked her, 10 years after the fact, did she think that the Velvet Divorce was a good thing or a bad thing. Her response was "We make better neighbors than roommates." ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
As a Slovak, when I cross Czech border I never feel like I am in a foreign country. There is one more country where I experience the same, it's Poland. 🇨🇿🤝🏻🇸🇰🤝🏻🇵🇱
I leaned to skate and play hockey by a young Czech skating coach. I remember calling him a Czechoslovakian and he rolled around the ice laughing. Good memories, thank you for everything Pavel my old Czech coach!
For what I’ve read and investigated, Czechs and Slovaks are basically brothers that are also the best of friends, they just moved to different but neighbouring homes but still see and talk to each other every day. 🇸🇰🇨🇿
@@Dutch_Uncle they resent being called czech (as they always did), but they're entirely too lazy to actually separate... they can handle the nagging, so long as they don't actually have to make decisions themselves lol. The lazyness is present in all of us... so when the politicians decided to separate into 2 countries, the people were like "Dude! Uncool"... but as always, people were too damn passive to do something about it. It's a small miracle we're not still enslaved by Hungarians to work their farms (which we basically were for around 1000 years)
@@ytubestolemyhandle Thanks, "Moravian" in contemporary US usage indicates a religious group of protestants. In the 1870-1890 period there was substantial emigration of "Bohemians" to the Great Plains of the US, Nebraska to Texas. Their language was described by them and their neighbors as "Bohemian," and the term "Czech" was not used until after WWI. I attended a Slovak event and was told that Slovak nationalism arose when Hungarian replaced Latin as the language of the courts, the schools, and public administration.
From what I read, the average Czech and Slovak didn't really care that much about being in the same state or having their own states. The split was really just caused by the politicians thinking this is what's best
(Slovak here) Let me add a few important facts that were omitted in the video that help explain the separation more in depth: 1. Both countries had different historical background: while Czechs had their own kingdom, even though subjugated by larger empires as Holy Roman Empire or Austrio-Hungarian empire, Slovaks were completely absorbed by the Hungarian kingdom. This resulted in different goals of national elites during period of romanticism, when the concept of nationality began to truly form: while Czechs wanted more political freedom, Slovaks wanted their own state - this was met with harsh rebuke from Hungarians who tried to erase Slovak nationality altogether by committing technically a cultural genocide: closed schools that taught Slovak language, imprisoned Slovak political activists, abducted children for re-education in Hungary, the police even dispersed protests by killing protesters. 2. Due to these differences, after the collapse of Austro-Hungarian empire and when creation of Czechoslovakia was being negotiated in the US, Masaryk (representing Czechs) promised Stefanik (who represented Slovaks) that Czechoslovakia would be a federation of two separate states, with separate legislature (much like US but on much smaller scale). Masaryk agreed but after the tragic death of Stefanik, he broke the promise, fearing the huge German minority in Czech part of Czechoslovakia and decided to create a unified state. This led to Germans becoming a much smaller minority compared to the total population and so their political power over Czech part diminished. This is why both Slovaks and Germans felt cheated and when Hitler rose to power, Germans wanted to join Germany and Slovaks wanted their independent state. And so Slovakia betrayed Czechs (who had been selflessly uplifting the much more impoverished and less industrially advanced Slovakia for years) and agreed with Munich agreement - they joined Hitler and left Czechs to be partly consumed and partly occupied by Germany. 3. After the war, the differences between Czechia and Slovakia in terms of industrialization continued to show in wages - Czechs have been always wealthier and this built up tensions on both sides: some Czechs complained that Slovaks are holding Czechia back while Slovaks thought that Czechia was neglecting development of Slovakia (they took difference in wages as proof) 4. After the fall of socialist regime, both countries had their own prime minister and while Czech prime minister was super eager to privatize and build a free market economy, Slovak prime minister was a very nationalistic goon (Meciar) who privatized state companies by basically giving them to his friends. So Czech politicians were glad they didn't have to negotiate with Slovak nationalists and Slovak prime minister had his own state that he almost totally captured for years to come. So in short - war was out of the question - even if Czechs prevailed the population would vote for even more radical nationalists and politicians were afraid of another Yugoslavia-style civil war + the brotherly relationship between the two made it almost impossible to convince the population to fight on either side (although not completely as can be seen in Ukraine today) and so Czechs decided to simply let go of their toxic neighbor - win-win situation for both sides. Thankfully, Slovakia, for the majority of it's population, has grown out of the childish nationalism and got rid of the almost-dictator Meciar and got accepted into EU thanks to free market reforms.
I think it should be noted at point 3 that this was not the case as when Czechoslovakia was formed about 90 % of its money came from Czech part and way more than 10 % was invested into Slovakia. So basically part of the money gained in Czechia was going to Slovakia. And throughout the history the gradient did not change. This lead to quicker development of Slovakia and the difference between the countries got smaller and smaller and smaller as the time went on. If they did not split, I think western half of Slovakia would have pretty much the same level as Moravia (eastern half of Czechia) by now. But as you hint at point 4, privatization and rush to build market economy and rebuild the market did not go that well in Slovakia. Also Id argue Czechia has better geographical position to build strong economy (though both of them kinda suck and are landlocked). Sadly in last few years Slovakia is not doing that well and the process of catching up to Czechia even reverted. I personally think it is the direct result of the late Slovak governments which to an outsider interested in Slovak politics feels like a fight between various groups of populists or nationalists while more moderate parties/voters just have to watch.
@@fridericusrex6289 I totally agree - Czechs mounted an enormous effort to uplift Slovaks in many ways but unfortunately Slovaks had different expectations - very similar in fact to the current popular opinions concerning EU, that is not improvements in education, infrastructure etc. but a raise in salaries is what really matters (to them). Despite all the heroic efforts, Czechs could not force development of Slovak economy to catch up with the Czech one, as Czech economy never stopped growing and the gap remained the same at best - pretty much as the race to catch up with the Western Europe nowadays. Well, I would sum up Slovak politics like this: Super populist Mečiar got beaten by a super right-wing coalition (SDKU) - that super right-wing coalition passed critical reforms that basically catapulted Slovakia into EU, NATO and earned Slovakia nickname Tiger from under Hight Tatras mountains as our economy growth outpaced everyone, including Czech Republic. Those reforms also targeted public spending and populists along with nationalists criticized those heavily + there was this leak from Slovak secret service about heads of the right-wing coalition taking bribes from companies that privatized state companies (Gorila) - this lead to populists beating the super-coalition so much that one populist party had the parliamentary majority - and that's when the growth stopped as many reforms were thwarted and state capture began - the entire justice department along with the police force got corrupted almost through and through as contemporary investigations have been revealing past 2 years. When one of the investigative journalists Jan Kuciak and his fiancée got killed by a hitman, the populist parties lost trust of the people and the loudest anti-corruption movement won the elections - unfortunately, that movement is also super--populistic but also combined with ultra-conservative Catholics which makes matters even worse. These anti-corruption populists found themselves in a crisis after crisis though (Covid, then war in Ukraine and energy crisis and then inflation) and unfortunately proved to be totally inapt to deal with any of them. You are right that our centrists and non-populists have always stood aside with little to no power: our libertarian party always had only a minority in parliament and our progressive party did not even get into the parliament by ridiculous 1000 votes, because they alone respected the law about coalitions (raising the minimum % of votes) and they also botched their campaign few days before the elections... Nevertheless I see similar patterns in Czech Republic - right-wing ODS and their coalitions and populist ČSSD taking turns to rule - periods of reforms and progress and periods of debt growth and stagnation...
I"m from Slovenia and i can only say that the way Czech and Slovak split was really civilized..unlike Yugoslavia, which Slovenia was part off! I must say that i really love both nations, Czech and Slovaks. They have almost identical language, but not the same! As Slovene i can understand Slovak a bit more than Czech!
There was no war because 1) we are too lazy for that 2) people didn't know about that, they just woke up one day and Czechoslovakia was no more, so people were like "ok" and that was all 😀
I'm from the czech republic and I see it as a big mistake . At the time neither populations really wanted it and it happend more due to apathy then anything of course . I would be for Czechoslovakia reuniting any day , but only if it was due to a fair democratic referendum ; forcing the Slovaks into czechslovakia would not be the right thing
I'm from Slovakia and I've never seen how Czechoslovakia works, but I think we shouldn't have split up. There are differences, but to me it's the same as someone from Bayern having a slightly different dialect and culture than someone from Lower Saxony. For me, Czechs are the same as Slovaks.
@@MrPeterPan What a joke. The situation is not at all comparable. People in this specific thread are for peaceful unification. When both parties are in favor of union. Russia is not unifying with Ukraine, it is invading it. And failing horribly at that. Go back into your hole.
In fact, more than 80% of people in both countries were against the division of Czechoslovakia. However, the politicians ignored it and decided not to ask the people at all. At the same time, none of the ruling political parties at the time had division in their program. I remember how we couldn't believe ,until the last moment, that they were serious and would actually do it...
Not true. Most Slovaks wanted the separation at that time... And it was inevitable to happen. Without the actual separation, large part of Slovak political scene would be obsessed about inciting tensions between Slovaks and Czech. With the actual separation, these nationalists lost the main reason to exist... We are very lucky that the separation was peaceful.
@@vladimirkraus1438 Not true. In 1918 slowaks wanted separation from hungary and help founded czechoslowakia. Without it, slowak state would not even existed and in some time slowaks may ended like polabian sorbs.... In fact, even the slowak secession from Czechoslovakia was forced by Germany. Volunteers from Bohemia and Moravia even had to "occupy" Slovakia by force because the Hungarian administration there refused to recognize international agreements. Separatits were, in fact, all the time of czechoslowakian existence in minority. Even in 1992 80% of slowakian citizens were against separation! I experienced it and I still remember it well, so don't try to lie to me here!
It was interesting to see this. I remembered Czechoslovakia from history classes and therefore ai was curious about what has happened to it. I have been to both Slovakia and the Czech Republic a couple of times and for some reason, I liked both countries 🇨🇿🇸🇰 and am happy to visit Slovakia as it is our neighbour. As a Hungarian, I am happy if our countries maintain good relations, and mutual acceptance instead of confrontation.
@@mari.be.86 But please, don't judge the whole nation based on this... Orbán won back in 2010 because the previous leadership almost bankrupt the country, and after this, real opposition was not existed, because most of us just don't want back the previous system too... so we just stuck to choose between "Douche and Turd"... 😪
I believe the real reason for the separation was the fact that after the fall of the communist regime the Slovak politicians connected to „interested parties“ wanted to have their own privatization of the state property/companies that were in the Slovak area and therefore have better opportunities of taking control of them. I mean in both countries Czech Republic and Slovakia there were some wild and heavy transfers of huge wealth from state entities to private hands. So, in conclusion I would say, „greed of few has decided the fate of many“.
My wife is from Slovakia and I asked her and her family why. It wasn't that they disliked the Czech they just felt the government spent all the money in the Czech part of the country and they got little. Her family was very much in favour of the separation. I've spent a lot of time in both countries and can say Czech Republic is alot more developed than Slovakia.
That is true as Czechia was basically factory of whole Austria-Hungary (and wallet of Vienna) and Slovakia was mostly agrarian part of Hungary, so there was big difference between various parts of the country from the beginning. (Not to mention Carpathian Ruthenia that was part of Czechoslovakia during interwar period which was basically stuck in some 17-18th century.) And as well most easily accessible deposits of Coal were in Czech part of Czechoslovakia, so the industry and country was developing from early 19th century.
Czech lands in Austrian-Hungarian empire wer higly industralized, whereas Slovakia was neglected and greatly rural in the part of the empire ruled by Hungarians. After the formation of Czechoslovakia in 1918, there wa a lots of effort to help not only Slovakia'economy, but also its state administartion an education. A great effort was made to industralize Slovakia especially after the WW2. The propaganda given above was spread by some politicians
one thing I found interesting in my reading is the manner in which the Czechs used their political sway in the a/h empire to suppress the Slovak language and culture.
@@cones914 The government gave up on highway on flat land and instead pushes it into hills where they need excessive bridges and tunnels to dig. 1km there cost multiple kms on flat lands so it is unreasonable, they can finish the southern highway much faster than move to the hills but nah
They did a phenomenal job symbolizing the peaceful separation during the last minutes of the Czechoslovak Television/ČST channel back on December 31, 1992. They played a song called Sbohem Slovensko (Goodbye Slovakia) with a man who represents the Czechs and a woman who represents the Slovaks. There's a long arm connecting them together to represent the unity. They're in a court filing for a divorce, the Slovak wanted it while the Czech was just chilling and didn't care what was going on. Then the court favored the Slovak and a guy with a long beard came in with a chainsaw to separate the long arm, which released Czechoslovak coins (to represent the currency's fall). They turned into children to represent that they're now young nations. In the song, they say "Uvidíš bez nich, bude ti líp. Sbohem, Slovensko, bude ti líp." which in Czech means "You'll see without them, you'll be better. Goodbye, Slovakia, you'll be better." and keep repeating "Goodbye, Slovakia, you'll be better."
According to what you said and how there was no referandum it makes me think the real reason the head of the regions decided to split was that they wanted more power for themselves.
thats how it was, no referandum, no questions, just some few guys wanting more power for themselfs, i think i am not the only one of this opinion but i am from slovakia and i think that if i was born into czechoslovakia i wouldnt mind but i'm glad to be just slovak today
Maybe like this!! In a united country I'm a politician, but in a divided country I might make president. Easy choice. Lemos, patronage, honor guards, and international travel. Medium sized frog in a small pond.🤣🤣🤣
That but also the fact that at the time democracy was still young and referendum weren't as common as today. It was more like that people voted their representatives to their government to make collective decisions for everybody. It was the time when e.g. president was voted by government not citizens.
@@adriangrunert513 Do you really wonder? Who went to further lengths in Ice hockey after separation? The talent was CLEARLY on the czech sides of things. That is historically objective truth. To represent is to earn it and the players did.
Thank you for this video. As a Slovak living in Czechia, I don't think the nations need to be separated, and they really are not, but since we are connected by pretty much everything but flag and law, I'm happy with the arrangement. It is better for the parts to be self and still connected to the whole, than to be forcefully part of one self. I would say our divorce is the one of, if not the best, examples of how peaceful disolutions can work. We still share the same culture, we still talk to each other, and yet we can grow in our own way.
Fun fact is that czechoslivaks wasnt nation. It was fake nation due to huge amount of germans in CS and hungarians. If slovaks would have some rights then german would ask for them to also hungarians. So fake CS nation was created. Also CSR ment to be federal republic like the USA which never happend and czech look at slovakia as part of czech lands not as same nation.
@@ejo5336 German-speaking Czechs, more like :D As much as Hitler loved to play the nationality card to help destabilize Czechoslovakia, the Czech Germans were treated far worse under his government than the Czech one (even more so than "East Germans" - back then mostly meaning the Germanized Slavs, rather than the more modern "post-communist Germans"). There were some very visible differences in religious practices and bits of culture, but other than that and the language, they were rather Czech. Heck, most of the Czech Germans (a non-negligible fraction of whom were Jews, of course) volunteered for the army when it seemed like the government might chose to defend the country from Hitler. But yeah, the interwar republic was certainly rather imperialistically moulded. The promised federation failed to shape up and kept getting delayed, territorial squabbles kept jeopardising relationship with key potential allies... and the whole republic was rather less democratic than it tried to appear even if you ignore the underrepresentation of "minorities" - the president's influence was far too strong. But of course, compared to the neighbours...
@@ejo5336 well that's a complicated topic. Czechs never really considered Slovakia "Czech lands". They were simply naturally a dominant nationality of the state, which officially didn't recognize the two as separate nationalities. Czechia was also much economically stronger. The truth is, to this day Czechs are prouder of the Czechoslovakian heritage than Slovakians. However, Slovakians reached what they wanted after WW1. They got separated from Hungary, could speak their language and develop their culture with no issues, and the investments of Czechoslovakia gave them the very option to exist as an independent country.
@@tomasmalin that is the main fact. Slovakia never had rights as it was agreed. As you said slovaks got what they want same as czech as they was kept under german control. There is a possibility slovakia may wouldnt exist but czechia same borders as we know them now. It would be possible as it was in protectorat. Both nations needed each other. Slovakia was agrear and rural compare to czechia. Separation only help slovakia in grow. Czechia is in better condition of course as when split happend czech had 75% of EU GDP and slovakia 50%. Czech was in profit and slovakia in deficit. Provement was currency as when countries separate course was 1:1. Also slovakia got Meciar who put it down and 90s was hard compare to czech so slovakia lost 7-10 years + 12 years of Fico. But even in this time makes huge progress compare to czechia. Atm each countries cowork and are best friends at least in Europe which is great. In same countries there would blame each other as in past or as moravia blame bohemia or prague or eastern slovakia blame bratislava and west slovakia.
I asked a Prague cabdriver what he thought of the breakup, his response was "let them go, they can't make a good beer". I knew then that there would be no problems.
Fun fact. Language between Czechia and Slovakia is very similar and and thanks to the dialects of Czech and Slovak there is no barrier, so it is very difficult to assign a dialect whether it is Czech or Slovak. The Moravian dialect is a little closer to Slovak, but it's completely at the border fluent
Here in the Yugoslav region we sometimes wonder why the hell we couldn't separate in the same civilized non bloody way as Czechoslovakia. I've lived in the Czech Republic for years and often visited Slovakia. Absolutely love both countries and the language is amazing. I'm not fluent in it but very happy I know and understand some of it.
the relations between the Serbs, Croats etc. were very different in comparison to C-S: we had no minority issues, no border issues, we never fought each other; actually, we had barely any significant touching points before establishing the Czechoslovak republic; most of the Slovaks had virtually no knowledge about the Czechs in 1918
By some members of former Yugoslavia living in my country, I don’t wonder at all. Even the generations that never saw Yugoslavia or the wars have pure hatred in their heart for their former brothers. It makes living with them a pain. But since I traveled to the region, I learned that those here are just bad examples living in the past .
@Al Pahlavi - I wonder the same. My theory is that this would work if every region was Slovenian-like (calm, basically nearer to Austria in culture than to rest of Balkan) or Bosnian-like (mixture of all nationalities and religions, so bit of less us-them tendencies and the famous "ethnic cleansing" mentality.
I am czech. My friend was serving in KFOR forces in Yugoslavia during war. I have seen many terrible terrible photos, heard terrible terrible stories from him. I am very sorry for you guys down there..
My cousin's live in Kosice and speak fluent Slovak they told me they understand Czech easily like it's not even a different language but a different dialect
Well of course as like 1000 years ago there was The Great Moravia where the ancestors of the modern Czechs, Moravians and Slovaks lived. That is why all these languages are somehow similar. For example as Slovak, I hardly understand Ukrainian and I do not understand Russian at all.
My Slovak friend explained to me the same thing regarding the Czechs and Slovaks difference in dialects. She said they see themselves as cousins of the same tribe like Scots and Irish.
As an Iranian who has just visited Slovakia, I got cool information from the video! Actually, the first part about the revolution and the protests for the death of a student was so familiar to me and reminded me of the current revolution in Iran and the people who started protesting for the death of a 22-year-old girl but then it got bigger and bigger and now people are fighting against the whole Islamic dictatorship in Iran.
@@janhejcman Slováci žijí v zaostalém lesnatém národě, mají štěstí, že dokonce dostali svůj stát, kdyby Česko nebylo po revoluci, rozdrtili bychom každého Slováka protestujícího za nezávislost a teď by mluvili česky.
@@ximrade4287 kdyby každý Slovák mluvil česky tak bychom ztratili velké kulturní dědictví. Východ Slovenska je sice zaostalý, ale to neznamená že nejsme jakožto národy bratři. Kdybychom drtili lid přející si nezávislost tak bychom nebyli o nic lepší než komunisti před revolucí. Je jejich právo chtít a mít nezávislý stát. Jen bych o odtržení udělal referendum, spíše než ho prostě udělal.
@@janhejcman Slovensko bylo českou kolonií a mělo to tak zůstat, udělali pro nás a my jsme vybudovali jejich stát, jen kvůli Čechům Slovensko není na vývojové úrovni Moldavska nebo zničene Ukrajiny.
I wouldn't say Czechoslovakia 'collapsed' the two states amicably separated (The entire event being called the 'Velvet divorce') and both states have very cordial relations to this day - to the point both mutually celebrated the anniversary this January.
It's always interesting how our history is described from the "outside", and this was a pretty nice video! Also big kudos for the pronunciation of the names :)
Thank you for this video, we will always love our Slovak brothers and sisters. Altrough I do have one nitpic, that being that Masaryk was no longer the president in 1938 as he had resigned in 1935 and died in 1937
Czech Republic views itself more like "Czechoslovakia without Slovakia" (we kept the old flag plus the foundation of Czechoslovakia in 1918 is our most important state holiday). Slovaks view 1993 as their final independence moment, a new quality.
Well tbf, never met a single person celebrating the creation of slovak republic in practice. State had introduced a lot of crap including it being a holiday while not having creation of czechoslovakia a state holiday, but it is not really what anyone wanted them to do, just like with the split, just no one asked. With regards to flag, it would probably make more sense if czechia and slovakia both adopted czechoslovak flag with emblems on them like moldova had.
@@starborneolympus3907 Exactly, we celebrate 1st of January as a New Year rather than an independence day. I've never heard of anyone celebrating that as such although most Slovaks I know are happy that we are not Czechoslovakia anymore.
Woodrow Wilson is very loved in Czech Republic to this day. He allowed them to become independent when he had called for the dissolution of the Astro Hungarian empire in one of his 14 points. Prague main station was named after him.
Not really. Wilson is a footnote in our (Czech) history books and only few people would tell you what role did he play. It's maybe unfair, but that's the way it is.
From Bangladesh, living in Germany, went to Czech for a vacation last summer. Told my dad I went to Czech Republic. He was so confused. Then I explained him its the Czechoslovakia. The country he knows are separate for 30 years. For him it was brand new infomation, because when he was in schools he only knew about Czechoslovakia. After he heard he went to literally wiki to know about the split.
@@thecringeinspector5636 Majority of mericans, yeah lol, but the very few who do, they're usually often more educated and possess more knowledge compared to the average American.
Even Bangladesh got it's independence from Pakistan. So much for being a Muslim but then Bangladeshis were treated worst by Pakistani Army (who did genocide of 3-million Bengalis). But in reality, both sides of Indian West Bengal state and Bangladeshis speak the same Bengali language.
There actually is a very good reason why Slovaks felt like splitting and most Czechs or even Slovaks don't really get it until this day (or can't verbalise it). I for sure didn't for a very long time and kinda thought that Slovaks were dumb for wanting to split. But I was wrong. There's ~ 10 million Czechs (like myself) and ~ 5 million Slovaks. They often like each other, no doubt. But there still is this ratio. When someone wants to publish a book, they go "meh, let's just do Czech version only, Slovaks can read Czech, they don't mind." and so it goes for everything. Czechs were the dominant culture in that common state and Slovaks and their language were _implicitly_ abused by the market forces and other biases. There was no _explicit_ law to "czechify" Slovaks, it just happens on its own. Like there wasn't any law to "gernanize" Czechs but it still happened, because why bother publishing a book in Czech when everyone speaks fluent German? Slovaks are still suffering from this because these forces didn't quite cease to exist and are not really going away so easily. But at least they have a country of their own, they safeguard their language and culture and they have no one to blame for their failures (but also no one to steal their thunder when they succeed). We are EU now, we can love Slovaks all we want, we have open borders and everyone's better off. This video doesn't really explain how Slovaks felt and I'm sorry I thought that Slovaks were hysterical to split and I felt hurt like a scorned women. They weren't hysterical and good for them to go! I love them all the same
@@PetrVita not even close enough. They basically say "there was a threat of germanization and hungarization, but then it wasn't an issue anymore and velvet revolution ..." That doesn't explain how any of these "foreign-izations" even work and that they are often actually opposed by both the larger and the smaller cultures. As in, Austro-Hungarian empire was really forthcoming in supporting Czech culture, kaiser and family paid for a significant part of our National Theater (both before it burned and even more after it burned). But also were genuine big fans, kaiser visited the "Interim Theatre" on every visit and also visited the construction site of the future National Theatre. Meanwhile, it was portrayed as if Czechs were in fierce battle for it and paid for everything, in spite of evil Germanic forces. Never happened. Same goes for Czechs who possible paid "our" money to further Slovakian language and culture, only to see it still fighting for survival. It's not an explicit process and this video explains none of this and only obfuscates the situation by portraying it as a hostile and intentional clash of cultures.
@@miroslavhoudek7085 Really? The video clearly states "Czechs outnumbered and overpowered the Slovaks within the union, but they had been the lesser of two evils..." And that is exactly the point you made with your original comment. The creation of Czechoslovakia by Masaryk and Stefanik was a marriage of the necessity to fight greater evils in 1918. That was not the threat present in 90's, and the split was a natural solution to the feeling of Slovaks being the lesser partner in the marriage. Many Czechs felt sad about Meciar suggesting we were not fair to them...
My family is more Diaspora Slovak and the miro comment is a great description. The Diaspora was more concerned with the differences than the countries. But because Diaspora tries to preserve some homeland culture outside the country it is sensitive to losing it's identity. That does not make bad feelings, it just made Slovak Diaspora worry more about being lost. As an aside the restoration of old Prague is truly special. And now we see similar efforts starting in Bratislava. Both cities are becoming fantastic cites in Europe. Prague is more complete of course. But Bratislava is affordable and ... well Slovakian. 🙂
There was no "explicit" law to germanize Czechs? So the forced recatolisation, centralisation - schools and offices only in German language, persecution of personalities of Czech national movement, was not "explicit"? :D Neither was the one in WW2, right?
Well explained, as a Czech, I approve this mini-documentary, even the pronounciation of the czech names and words was accurate. :) Greetings from CZ! ;)
I have many Slovak and Czech friends and when I've asked why they separated they don't seem to know. Now I know why, it wasn't their decision, they were never asked !
It's not the true. There were election. And in Slovakia the politicians, which wanted to keep Czecoslovakia togather, was defeated. You need to ask people which remember that time.
@@julm7744 That's a very good point, it's the same in Scotland with the SNP. Not all their supporters want to seperate from the UK, people vote for parties on lots of issues, not just one. Only in a Referendum do you have one issue to vote on.
Pretty good summary. Except the title is a little misleading. Czechoslovakia DID NOT "collapse". It didn't even "fall apart" I dare to say (0:31). It simply split in a peaceful, planned and organized manner.
As an Australian it’s not uncommon for people to refer to Czechia and Slovakia as “Czechoslovakia”. I always wondered why the two separated, but I’m glad to see that their still remains friendship between the two. I guess it’s somewhat similar to us and New Zealand.
Yeah if almost every Australian has some family in New Zealand and vice versa. Czechia tends to be more liberal (the bohemian part at least) and Slovakia more conservative (excluding the capital). Slovaks are perceived as more passionate and hot headed and Czechs as more fatalistic and phlegmatic.
People were against the separation. My parents grew up in those times. Politicians wanted to fill their pockets simple as that. People protested against the separation. After things started getting privatized after the collapse of the soviet Union. It all kicked of. Politicians and their families became the richest in the country. They split so they could have more people in power.
Czechoslovakia was made due to the power vacuum left from Austria Hungary. The allies felt if there where too many small nations they would be eaten up in piecemeal by countries like Germany. It's also why Yugoslavia was created, and why Romania got all of Transylvania. They where supposed to create a little entente that would appose foreign intervention
A collection of thoughtful, positive comments from a wide range of sources must be one of the greatest compliments a YT video can receive. This was a pleasure to see, hear and read.
You still call yourself Czechoslovak as one parent is Czech and other is Slovak so you're Czech-Slovak :) My ancestry is Slovak and of course I'm sure I have Czech ancestry.
I don’t see Czechoslovakia as a country that collapsed but rather 2 countries that held a peaceful National Divorce And more countries could learn a thing or two from them
In fact, this video was weak with some misinterpretations. If you are interested in the topic and I can recommend a video called ‘VELVET DIVORCE after 30 years‘ by @DreamPrague
There was feeling among Slovaks they would be happier alone. And as freely as we join together we separated. This way our love for each other nations didn't die.
When a child grows up, becomes independent and starts his own family and a new home, this is not the collapse of the original family. That is the culmination of its meaning.
Czechoslovakia didn't "collapse". It's just that Slovakia wanted to be independent, that's all. I lived there during the transition (1991-92). It was not such a traumatic thing but really quite - I would say - "friendly".
Czech Republic and Slovakia are great example how two countries who were unified can separate peacefully, still work together with respecting each other, and more importantly make progress in every aspect. They can serve us as a model of what this world needs. Great video by the way. I love your visual effects. 😊
@@martinvyslouzil2163 True. Bohemia in particular though has a far richer and more impactful history than someone might think considering where they sit in the grand scheme of things today.
Interesting story to be told! I used to live in Slovakia during 2016 - 2018 and during that time I did notice a significant difference between Czechs and Slovaks, also between Moravian and Bohemian Czechs and Western and Eastern Slovaks. If you go to Presov, Humenne, Kosice or Poprad you will see a very poor side of Slovakia. Unlike Nitra, Trnava, Trencin, Bratislava and even Galanta where they have a lot of businesses, especially in the field of logistics. Lots of warehouses and goods to be transported with a good highway. Meanwhile, Banska Bystrica, Zilina, Ziar nad Hronom and Zvolen which are located in the center of the country as well as Brezno keep a very hidden, very interesting mountain culture. I believe Ruzomberok, Spisska Nova Ves and Liptovsky Mikulas too, although I haven't been in these cities yet.
There would be differences between people living in Prague and in a small village, there would be differences between Bavarians in the mountains and Berliners, or between people I already mentioned above.
My family heritage is from Krasna Luka and Hertnik.I have researched these two towns and find them to be somewhat on the poor side. Do you know where these small towns are located? Would you recommend someone with 100% slovak blood to visit there? I am certain I still have distant family living in these towns.
@@christinepalsa6307 sure if you have a good liver and aren't afraid of gaining some weight because Slovaks are very welcoming people who love getting their relations drunk and stuffed full of delicious food when they visit.
Interesting observation!!But true!!Too late to do anything but my view is that they should stay together and build strong economic identity!!!Love them both!!!
@@christinepalsa6307 Hey, I see Krasna Luka is close to Stara Lubovna in the wider Poprad/ Eastern Tatras/Zamagurie region and Sabinov. Unfortunately I have never been in that area in particular as was too far away from where I used to live (Trnava) and not very easy to reach with public transport. My flatmate was from Kezmarok and he was a terrible person, used to live with him forcefully by my employer for almost a year and so that also had contributed to me not going there. But this year or somewhere in the future I may consider a trip there, why not?
I thought that the PM and the head of the Slovak parties got together to have dinner and a few drinks to sort out a couple of problems. As the evening wore on, the few became many, and they began joking about splitting the country as a solution. Things became rather fuzzy after that, but when they recovered from their hangovers they discovered that they had actually done it. Papers signed, borders drawn on a map, and so forth. It was too late to say “We didn’t mean it “.
As a Czech, I like your story. It certainly felt like something similar has happened as out of the blue, with no tensions among regular population, we were told we are separated by a border.
Talking about Czechoslovakia brings tears to my eyes even thou I have been born already in Czech Republic. Poor thing we are not one anymore. But that´s what Slovaks wanted
Not really collapsed, but more like: Slovakia: "Hey, I like you, but I want to leave now." Czechia: "Yeah, okay. Here's your half of everything, and you can go." Slovakia: "Thanks fam. We still friends?" Czechia: "Heck yeah man. Have fun being independent my dude." *Slovakia left the chat*
Thank you for this video. After 30 years this peacfull separation proves that two sovereign nations can be closer in two different states then within one. I wish this example was followed by others.
To my to máme všetko ľahšie, nakoľko Čechov je viac a teda, skôr je vždy český dabing alebo české titulky než slovenské. :D :D See? This is how fluently and without any problems Czechs and Slovaks communicate.
I don't know why but whenever I get to talk or work with Slovak I get so happy and excited. For some reason it's bring me joy talking with themm which might be because I really enjoy teh way their language sounds
Dubcek wanted to build "socialism with a human face". This is interesting in two ways - 1) yes, socialism doesnt have a human face, it was terror. 2) When Dubcek tried these reforms, ruZZians quickly invaded our country and we were occupied for 20 years. Ruzzians don't support anything human to this days. This is why most Czechs support Ukraine. We have a personal experience of russian occupation and terror.
Hi.. great video & illustrations. One feedback: It would be nice and highly appreciated to use date-month-year format whenever dates are shown as most people & most countries in the world always uses such better format. For instance: 17 June 2025 or 17/06/2025 ; 02 April 2024 or 02/04/2024 etc. It follows logical time sequent from the most frequent changes (the date) which is usually the first necessary thing to know, to the least (the year). In addition, it eliminated comma (,) and clearer. For example 20 April 2024 is much clearer at a glance than April 20,2024 Thank you and best wishes,
I'm American but my maternal side fled Czechoslovakia. Czech, Slovak & English were all spoken in unison in our household and we are ethnically Czech & Slovak. We originated in a village called Svincany, Bohemia, but Slovakia is not far, Moravia is very near. So I personally don't have any distinction & still use the title Czechoslovakia because that's what I will always think of my family's nation as being. I am not going to use one or the other. I've heard Czechia being coined a lot now, but that's pronounced oddly & nobody has a clue where you're talking about!! Or they think you're referring to Chechnya which is frowned upon here in Massachusetts due to the bombers who were from there. They are seen as Muslim & the kind of immigrants people don't want here. When you say "Czechia", people don't have a clue but when you say Czechoslovakia, they do!! Despite some younger generations not being around when Czechoslovakia existed. An in my family we call ourselves Bohemians, and identify as both a mix of Czech & Slovak & either refer to our land of origins as Bohemia (the old empire), or Czechoslovakia. You could say we're stuck in the past but we knew if you wanted to pursue better in life, you leave. We still have a branch or wing out in Siberia, as many Slavic & people's do to which goes back to when the USSR hunted people and cast them out to internment prisons. We have some extended family in Ukraine, from when Czechoslovakia was helping with deforestation & advancement in industrialization in Ukraine in between the wars. An none of the other references to the two countries (Czech Republic/Slovakia), sound right when you are of both ethnically speaking. We don't even consider them two separate nations. That was mainly a financially motivated decision to which we don't recognize. These politicians can create all the messes they desire & for whatever agenda's they might have, but you only have to see things the way YOU decide to see them.
I am Czech (or rather Moravian) with Slovakian ancestry and I don't think we are not separate nations. Slovaks have always had a bit different mindset, which is normal since they were developing under different influences. Czechoslovakia was rather an attempt to escape oppression and gain our independency, which we have achieved, but there's no reason to keep it alive by force.
Thanks for the story. You sound like the expert on the subject. My grandfather is from Seilnica Liptov Slovensko. He immigrated to the US in 1910 when he was 14 years old. He wrote the story of his journey and the life he left. Not to get into it but it his story sounds like he was an indentured servant. At that time was serfdom practiced in that area of Slovakia? My grandmother's father immigrated from czechoslovakia as well but the city is now located in Ukraine. Was the far west part of Ukraine once czechoslovakia?
I must disagree here. For us czechs, nothing really changed in past centuries. Kingdom known as Kingdom of Bohemia, or by it´s official name "Lands of Bohemian Crown" is in our language called "Czech Kingdom" or "Lands of Czech Crown" So we don´t feel like "young" nation. We are czechs who were in Central Europe for more then 1000 years. Slovaks on the other hand, were slavic part of Kingdom of Hungary. Yes, both our nations were part of Great Moravia in 9. century, but so were others west slavic comunities. Since then, we Czechs had our own Kingdom, where slovaks were part of Kingdom of Hungary. Yes, we were autonomous part of Holy Roman Empire, and then not really by choice autonomous part of Austro-Hungarian Empire, but we still kept our nation identity and partial sovereignty. Slovaks didn´t felt to be Hungarians also, so they leant towards us, during both nations National Revival they created similar language (from mix of protoslavics, moravian and czech) but their traditions, mentality and customs were totally different. Slovaks don´t like hearing it, but their mentality and customs are more hungarian when czech customs (and this we don´t like to agree with) are influenced by Germany, or in some parts by Poland. With mentalities and values it is similar situation. We created "Czechoslovakia" just to overwhelm Other nations present in our lands to be able to create "National Country" even tho, it was basically just fraud how to get support from other countries, United States included. As of now, opinions on whole spliting things differs. As for me, I am actually more leaning towards "pro-splitting" as i like to have my own country, not an confederation. There was country called Czechoslovakia, but there never was czechoslovakian nation. As for calling our countries Czechoslovakia, it is the same nonsense as calling, Greece Otoman Empire, Croatia Yugoslavia, Ukraine SSSR or Aliaska Russia.
@@lukasfelix6509 This is actually a great comment! I'm from Slovakia and I agree with the part that mentality and way of life might have been influenced by the Hungarians, only because mainly on the south parts of Slovakia there was a lot of Hungarians living there fo so long. And yes the country was called Czechoslovakia but on both ends there were Slovaks and Czechs living separately, minding their own traditions and business.
Czechoslovakia did not collapse. Both the Czech Republic and Slovakia are totally free electoral democracies, members of the European Union and participants in the Schengen Agreement of the European border control-free travel area. There is no compulsion, no hostility, and they are good neighbors. The way the Czech Republic and Slovakia split was really a civilized example that people in other parts of the world could learn from.
The Czech Kingdom has been here since about 1200 A.D. .... I have to smile every time someone says that the Czechs had their first state and they talk about the 20th century...
I’ve always wondered why 🇨🇿 is called by it’s official name ‘Czech Republic’ instead of Czechia, but nobody calls 🇸🇰 by its official name ‘Slovak Republic’ instead of Slovakia. 😂
That's because of the Czech name. We never had a word for it. Before Czechoslovakia it was Čechy(Bohemia) but That's only like ⅔ of Czech republic. When other parts connected (Moravia&Silesia) it was Czechoslovakia so when we split in 1993 theword for our state "Česko" (Czechia) was made but it wasn't so popular and for some reason people preferred Czech republic
Not only for the English. I remember the Expo 2000 in Hannover, where the Slovakia was placed into the "Adriatic states" and Slovenia into the continental middle-Europe. Very funny. So the Slovak have got some sea for the first time, at least by mistake.
As a citizen of Slovakia let me tell you, many people were not happy with our new flag after separation. It looked too much like Russian. And I'm still unhappy with our flag as a state symbol. I think we should change it.
1:00 Do you also consider Bohemia, Moravia and Slovakia, which were created in 1918 by the state of Czechoslovakia on the ruins of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, to be Eastern European?
My mother's parents came to the U.S. from Slovakia just before the First World War. Because of this I know something about the differences between Slovaks and Czechs. Slovakia is more rural than Bohemia, and the Czechs looked upon the Slovaks as country bumpkins, while the Slovaks looked upon the Czechs as snooty city slickers.
You are right about this - this was one of the reasons. The differencies in industry and economics were one of the more important aspects of the separation.
Both of my grandmothers were Slovak, my grandfather was Moravian. They came to the U.S. just before WW2, and I drove to my grandmother's village just north of Bratislava to meet her and my sister when I was stationed in Munich in 1990. I had to laugh when she told me to tell my relatively well-off Moravian relatives that I owned the to my eyes mundane Opel rental that I was driving. She had lived in the U.S. for over 50 years and ran a prosperous business with my grandfather and still had somewhat of a Slovak peasant girl inferiority complex when it came to her in-laws lol.
Those who truly want to know the history of Europe, must include the spread of Christianity after 400 CE, up to the formation of the Holy Roman Empire, 800 CE, and which ended officially in 1806. This was followed by the German Confederation after the removal of Napoleon 1815. Prague not only served as the capitol of the HRE, but had served as the very seat of German intellectual culture, in both the HRE, and the German Confederation: Europe's first German university, was established in Prague, (It still exists there today). Sorry if I offend any Czech Nationalsts: Up to1920, German was the majority language in the city of Prague, (the same was true in Habsburg Budapest). Historical roots: Ancient Bohemia was well known to the Ancient Pagan Romans. It was the land of the Bohi, a powerful Keltic kingdom, which Pagan Rome was never able to conquer. Pagan Rome made treaties with the Bohi, and the two lived in peace, and friendly trade. The punitive "treaties" of Versailles, St Germain, and Trianon, were designed trap millions of ethnic Germans behind foreign political borders, and break their influence in Central Europe. The story of the three million rural Sudeten Germans is well known, so I do not need to go into detail. Well documented was the spread of Christianity throughout Central Europe, by German Knights. The story of the Teutonic Nights is well documented, and that of the leadership by the Habsburgs, which, especially during the 18th and 19th centuries, brought economic prosperity, modernized agriculture, and trade to these lands. Habsburg Catholic leadership was liberal, tolerant, and progressive. Laws against "Usuery", and prohibitions against "Profit Taking", and "Ungodly Technology", were dropped, in favor of economic growth. It is proper to ask: "Why do "Yugo-Slavia", and Czecho-Slovakia" no longer exist?" In 1919 "Slovakia" was still 40% Hungarian. Bratislava Fortress was at the very center of Hungarian history, and culture. It was economically open and free, due it's location on the great Danube Trade Route. Nevertheless, the Hungarian Kingdom, which had existed for 1,000 years intact, was reduced by 3/4 of it territory, by punitive acts imposed upon it, after 1919-1920. Ask Hungarians today, what they think about all this: They have not forgotten. These historical facts apply to both 1920 created states. Millions of Hungarians were trapped and deprived of their property, and rights of citizenship by the creation of "Yugo-Slavia": The Vojvodina, is still home to a large Hungarian population. Large parts of today's Croatia, have deep Hungarian cultural roots as well. The exact same applies, of course, to Transylvania, (Romania). We are talking wholesale property loss, and expulsions: Factories, farms, villages, schools, and cities. It would not matter, if all Europeans were happy just to live together, and respect each other's rights. But the criminal actions committed against millions of blameless, by the acts of jealous revenge of 1919-1920, have unfortunately left scars behind. Perhaps justice will only be done when all internal borders in Europe are finally eliminated. (?).
In case of both Germans and Hungarians in those areas,they came there,they settled there and claim it to be their. Sudetenland was Czech for centuries and fact that Germans got an offer to move there didn´t make it their land,yet they tried to take it multiple times. Even in the first Czechoslovakian republic,Germans had quite a lot of power and privileges,especially in contrast to other minorities,yet they chose to betray the republic and expel Czechs from Sudetenland... by force. (also German being main language in Prague in times of A-H wasn´t exactly thing that we wanted,it was kind of an expected effect of being under rule of Germans...)
I have small objection about "trapping behind foreign borders" border of Bohemia and Moravia were like that (save for several minor changes) for several centuries.
@@tefky7964 Czechs, Slovaks, and Hungarians all lived good under Habsburg leadership. Liberal Western Cultural (Catholic), values predominated, as opposed to the restrictive life style in Eastern Europe under Eastern Orthodox cultural dominance. Austria-Hungary was a free country, with a vibrant economy, and system of open borders, and international trade.
@@tefky7964 German language dominance was due to economic forces. The HRE, and German Confederation policies, benefitted all ethnic groups. None of these facts have anything to do with Nazis.
Totally agree. The First World War was a huge mistake for Europe. Central European countries would be 10 times stronger and richer if the Austrian empire still intact and it should. The nationalism movement was a trap to enslave the Central Europe developed by the French and English.
He's building, inappropriately, on the success of his video about Yugoslavia, where the word "collapse" is fair comment. I've commented on this before I saw your comment, and agree entirely
As a Czech few yeras ago I believed it was wrong decision of 2 leaders back then. Divide was not necessary since most people didn want to/care. But now Im glad its done. After last election its clear that Slovaks are more pro-russia, and czechs more pro-western.
i had the Czech ambassador speak to a class i was in in university, he said he was told to NOT talk about Quebec separating from Canada, and proceeded to talk about how Quebec separating was NOT how the Czechs and Slovaks separated. lol
@@tunahan4418 Quebec has had a couple of referendums on separating, including a 1995 vote that was 49.5% in favor of leaving Canada and 50.5% in favor of staying. IT REMAINS A CONTENTIOUS ISSUE
As a Slovak myself, I can say that for us Slovaks Czech republic and Czech language are not considered foreign. In fact, half of the shows shown in TV are in Czech, games sold in our region are localized in Czech, and many people prefer Czech translation in many books. If a Slovak person wrote "Czech" among foreign languages in their CV, they would get funny faces because of that. We can even study in Czech republic and the tuition bill will be footed by Slovak government! Bratia navždy!
Ja som Slovák a mám rád Česko
Slovensko je pro mě takové "polozahraničí". Náš vztah asi nemá ve světě moc obdob. 🙂
@@rickfrombohemia9550 I was thinking maybe Belgium and the Netherlands. Tho the Flemish and Dutch are basically the same which with close to 0 cultural and linguistic differences.
@@tunahan4418 Yeah, Benelux is close. Or Scandinavia.
@@tunahan4418 Bosnia Croatia Serbia Montenegro situation, they speak the same language
Honestly I'm impressed by the brotherly love between the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Peaceful separation is amazingly rare in history and to remain close following the separation is amazing
Fight between us is like between you brother who live next door and go on daily basis borrow milk from you and you visit him for talk, beer and cigarette. All together we are 15-16 million of people who do not get a damn about others until they mess with us. Both nations were oppressed and like to live in peace. Nicely watch to the valleys in the sunset full of beer and cannabis 🎉
Not every divorce ends with the spouse are flinging plates at each other, breaking their things by throw out a window of flat, wrangling over property and fighting over the children in court. Sometimes ex-spouses remain friends who are happy to help each other in their life.
It's not really a divorce: both are in EU
I remember the split, and how peaceful and friendly it was. A fine historic moment for humanity. Made me proud to be a human.
@@petervlcko4858 tak neviem ci si taky mlady, zaciatkom 90tych to bolo huste
Cesi pesi do Prahy, Havel v podstate nemohol verejne vystupit na SVK, aby nedostal vajcom … veci sa upravili az par rokov po prevrate
I am a Hungarian and despite all historical troubles between Hungarians and Slovakian/Czech people, every time I travel to Slovakia or Czech Republic it really stuns me how similar we are. The dishes, the fashion, the architecture, the general customs of people is so similar, even if we speak completely different languages. It seems logical from a historical perspective, but it is really eye opening after so many hate, wars and supression on each other. I really respect Czech and Slovakian people and I wish we had some similar brother nations like theirs.
Koszi szepen! I am a Slovakian
@@SFjunior the funny thing is, you are Slovakian and your family name in Hungarian means "potmaker, potter". I am a Hungarian, and my name literally means "Croatian". Some heritages are just interesting.
hat igen tenlegvitszes@@zoltanhorvathandsomenumbers
Slovak/Hungarian relationship is one of the biggest missed opportunities for brotherly relationship. We lived for centuries side by side, only to be divided by the turmoils of 19th century nationalism.
But hey, we all are part of the Central European family of nations. There is really no "Hungarian isolation".
I remember first time visiting Budapest and thinking its basically the same as Prague. Heck the two cities even have a castle in almost the same spot lol.
Divided by boundaries, united by hearts.
Love you my Czech brothers
Rent?
@@sarkis951 Ah it's no big deal. But if you feel that bad about it, you can buy me pizza sometime
We could've been a greater nation together.. Feels bad
@@mrditkovich2339 LOL. Carrying the torch like a boss. Mad respects
@briansedlacek1963 Learning more about the history of Nations that became Countries and beaten back into States holds a large category. Fear not for it is the individual, their perspective and amount of BS they will palletize under the guise of a flag that has and will decide the pages as they continue to turn.
Czechoslovakia did not collapse as much separate, the ministers of both countries obliged to divide the Territory after the cold war
Well said.
At a 2:1 ratio
When it’s this peaceful, this mutual and were not long unified as one, I do agree separate and not collapse. Collapse to me means violent or where one side was trying to force the other the stay.
@@JaziTheWolfthats a 0:100 failed ratio
@@DragonTheOne what?
The Slovakian president once said "There are no countries closer to each other than Czechia and Slovakia" and I totally agree.
Maybe Albania and Kosovo?
not slovakian... but slovak
Greece and Cyprus
There are … Romania and Moldova we have the exact same language and heritage and half of Moldovans have Romanian citizenship now😂
me too
The Czechs and Slovaks looked at one another. Shrugged.
And then the country fell apart.
Honestly it's about as well as something like this can possibly go.
Czech republic is more of a slavic nation with lot of germanic influence. Due to lot of ethnic german living there due to its history. It was part of austrian empire as a recent example
Prague was even a sort of bilingual german-czech city during austro-hungarian. German being the elite language
While slovakia is more of pure slavic nation more similar to poland/yogoslavia/russia. Since a lot less ethnic german lived there. And it was a very rural country. So less german elites and german industries settled there
@@mathewvanostin7118 Bratislava wasn't that much different from Prague when it came to languages. It was probably divided into nearly perfect thirds - slovakian, german (austrian) and hungarian. And the rest of the country was also full of german-speaking or hungarian-speaking peoples. But yes, the national movements of WW1 and communist movements of WW2 quickly get rid of both germans and hungarians.
@@mathewvanostin7118 sounds like czech is west germany, slovakia east germany (perhaps not culturally but by industries... west got all industry, east farming).
Indeed. When one thinks of the wars caused by independence movements throughout the world, this was a very amicable separation.
@@MrLeedebt With the EU, Schengen and the Euro, what's really changed other than both groups getting their own space. If anything it might have made their relations BETTER
I have met several Czeck and Slovak people and when I asked them why their countries split, they all told me: "I don't know; the politicians..." One girl even told me: "my stepfather became a foreigner over night" 🤷🏻♀️
We couldn't reach an agreement about how the federation would look like, so we splitted before it would harm our state and our relations. Considering how wild the 90s were, it was probably the best choice.
Slovak populist nationalists spread the "Czechs are only holding us back on purpose and don't want us to succeed" narrative for winning the elections, similar to Trump and Putin agenda
Well it all was just a power play of power hungery politicians that partitioned and destroied big portions of indurstrial welth. (Opinion shared by 80% people i knou
Actually it was a super secret plot by Canada 🇨🇦 to weaken the Czechoslovakian National hockey team by splitting it in two and we succeeded beautifully 😀😃😄😁😆😅🤣
Ask older ones ;)
Czech here. I think the separation actually helped both nations as we could get more autonomy (more important to Slovaks I believe) and yet treat the other ones with respect and cooperate better.
Yep, Slovaks were a bit bitter over dominance of Czech region in politics.
@@petrskalak5070 Can we blame Slovaks for being bitter? The only reason we had communism in Slovakia was because the communist party won in the Czech part of the country, but not on the Slovak side, so we ended up with communism ''tanks'' to our Czech brothers (there were twice as many Czech voters). I think that was one of the reasons why Slovaks wanted to go their separate way and I think it was beneficial for both countries.
I'm Czech and I would like to thank for this video as well for so many nice comments here. Very often it seemed to me our history doesn't matter to the rest of the world, but now I can see how much I was wrong.
So well said!
I don't know a lot about Czech's History, but clearly it does matter. I mean, your place in the HRE was significant and that's not something we should discard. The Slovaks, however (and I'm sorry to say this), their history have not the same weight. Still, I'm pretty sure there is some cool stuff about the Slovak's History, but I don't know it.
@Tenval Mestr Czech history isn't as complicated as Slovak history.
Slovaks were occupied by Hungarians for centuries. Slovaks were not even allowed to use/teach their native language because of Hungarian rule, but then Bratislava was a coronation city for the Hungarian kingdom, so it wasn't as boring as some people think.
Hungarians built a lot of beautiful chateaus and manor houses in Slovakia. We've been fighting together against Ottomans for centuries (Czechs were lucky enough to avoid Turkish attacks), but Ottomans also built a beautiful SPA in Trencianske Teplice. There are several examples of foreign influences in Slovakia which in my view makes the country more interesting but it also shows how different Slovakia is to Czech Republic. In Czechia, pretty much everything is Czech, Slovakia is way more diverse than many people realise
@@vkdrk Don't get me wrong, I didn't mean it as an insult. I am myself from an "unknown" people (Bretons). It's just that our people weren't the ones who wrote History, it doesn't mean we had no influence on it and no culture to show. After all, Slovakia was in the middle of Poland, the HRE, Hungary, Russia, the Ottoman Empire, ... so I have no doubt about the diversity in Slovakia !
@@vkdrk "We've been fighting together against Ottomans for centuries" such true words!
As an American I see that the 2 peoples of the area didn't want to live in the same house together, but just wanted to be good neighbors instead. No drama, no nothing, but can still hang out together when they want. Nothing fell apart, just kind of went their own ways, but not too far away.😊
We wanted to live in the same house,even if it meant more independence for Slovaks and refendum wouldn´t pass,but once again policitians ignored will of the people...
There is more division between Red and Blue states than there is between Czechs and Slovaks.
@@tefky7964 That's not the only place where politicians ignore the population.... My bet is that every politician of any country and nation does that and never do what's right for everyone, they do what's better for themselves and only take action if pressured or charged, at least that's what happens in third world countries.
The reason for separation was all about the money from privatisation. Getting rid of Czechs was the only way to ensure more influece. The argument of Slovak nationalism was the only thing what could mrs Mečiar and his post communists come up with to destroy this state.
@@yuukiyoshizawa7007 the struggle to ensure individual leaders accurately interpret the will of their people seems to be an age old human story regardless of time or governmental type, with the recurring result being the more power individuals get without equal accountability by law, the more things go off the rails. I would consider Czechoslovakia to not have been a failure in breaking up considering how peaceful and cooperative even that was.
If it were my country, it would have started because someone figured out how to make money off the split, these people would then rile up a certain section of the populace that gets real angry over anything the TV says to, and someone would definitely get hurt before everything was through, probably no civil war, but it wouldn’t be Czechoslovakia’s “okay, that can be your half, and this mine” and the borders of this new entity would be a snaking nightmare of wealth inequality with an undertone of racism.
I’m an Italian citizen born in Brazil, there is, two citizenships. I went three times to Czech Republic and love all I saw there. It is the kind of place Everyone should choose to live after retiring. My prefered place to live is Visehrad. Even if I did not go yet to Slovakia, I believe that is the same as Czech Republic. Long and peaceful life to the entire people of the two countries. And enjoy the best beer in the world, Pilsen Urquel.
I'm from Slovakia and it's a little bit wilder here. (mainly in East)
@@The_technic_Nuget kamo bratislava obchodna battle royale
Iam Czech and love Brazil. So nice country and people. In Brazil is popular beer Bohemia. This is name for ancient Czech Kingdom.
Obrigado💚
Im Czech and I was in Brasilia, ist nice place, lots of joyful people around, many friendly faces, wish there is not that much corruption, Florianopolis seemd like a nice place to live.
Im Czech btw It wasnt collapse it was the most peaceful split. There was no animosity. It was just that we decided to part ways but we are still super close.
In a world with many groups hating each other we can all learn something from the Czech and Slovaks.
Czech-American, and I also came here to object to the word "collapse". The split followed accepted political procedures with comparatively minimal conflict , and everything worked out fine.
@@lfilm3 We have what you could call friendly rivalry. Also Slovaks didnt like that during Czechoslovakia years Prague was the capital and not Bratislava.
You decided nothing. You just did what your masters told you to do, just as in 1938, and again join Reich.
And Yugoslavia had left the earth. 😅
To all the Czechs and Slovaks, you guys have established a good example of peaceful separation. On the other hand, look at the things that happened in Yugoslavia, we saw how brutal and bloody a breakup could be.
They had religion problems down there in Yugoslavia, thankfully, it was totaly different situation than in mostly atheist Czechoslovakia. But religion is also what makes a difference between Czechs and Slovaks, you barely find a religious person in Czechia, but it's considered standard to be a catholic in Slovakia. They have their "classic christian values" nazis and most of Slovaks support that, while Czechia is liberal atheist country, which is massive cultural difference.
@@Pidalin Slovakia is a Christian country...well, only 50 - 60% of Slovaks are religious and the % of people who actively practice religion is even lower. Spain, Greece, Poland etc. are far more religious than Slovakia. Slovaks don't take religion that seriously.
Czech republic is an atheist communist country. We had communism in Czechoslovakia ''thanks'' to our Czech voters...communist parties did not win in Slovakia but because there were more Czech than Slovak voters...we ended up with communism
@@vkdrk Communist parties didn't win in the Czech part either. But they did gain enough government clout to push a violent coup (hint: oppose openly violent opposition from gaining direct control of the instruments of violence in a state if you want to avoid that fate). It's all rather complicated, just like the religiousness. There's plenty of people who identify as Christian, quite similar to Slovakia really; but it's not generally considered something you share publicly. It's considered a private matter.
Though disturbingly, little fish symbols on cars have started appearing at an alarming rate, so that might be changing again. The power of the Christian voters also seems to be increasing, with significant strength behind "traditionalist" (=Christian) laws being pushed. It's going to be an interesting century for sure.
Wasn't peaceful. People didn't want to split. Only the politicians.
@Ondřej Matějka That's a very oversimplified explanation. Moravians have been more religious than Czechs. Slovaks are often religious. In all parts of ČSFR, catholicism was the dominant religion and it also used to strongly influence our cultures. Czechs are liberal rather in the sense that they don't care what other people do. As a result, religion is not something people would fight over in Czechia or Slovakia. A fun fact: at least 4 of 5 leaders of the current Czech governmental parties are religious.
Some important notes that should be included: The first Czechoslovak republic created a notion of common Czechoslovak nationality because there were more Germans than Slovaks in the new state. When it comes to communism, it was much more popular in what is now Czechia than Slovakia which put a strain on the relation. During Prague Spring, Husák was originally a supporter of the reform, but changed sides when Dubček refused to federalize the republic. After 1968, a federal structure was created, comprised of the Slovak and Czech Socialist Republics.
The half-million protest was not at Wenceslas Square but at the Letná Plain (though it began at the square). You can't fit that many people there. Slovaks had to fight much harder for their survival as a nation and thus were more nationalistic. In the early 90s, the leading political party in Czechia was based on economic issues, but the main Slovak political party was based on nationalism. The Czechs, led by Klaus, wanted a unitary state or a tight federation. While Slovaks, led by Mečiar, wanted a loose confederation. That was the main issue Czechoslovakia split on.
Agree ... It's quite accurate ... Czechs basically didn't care much and did not understand Slovak's nationalism ... Guess, we've already passed the period of self-determination during 1918.
But I think that if we wouldn't split, there would be much more conflicts later ... It was political only (no referendum in Slovakia) but I don't think there was other solution acceptable for political parties on both side ...
Very informative. This seems like the real story of the dissolution of Czechoslovakia. I wonder if there weren't additional reasons, like different historical paths that led to different attitudes. I guess Bohemia was very rich and industrialized even from the Middle Ages, while Slovakia was I think much more rural historically. Recently I saw statistics showing that far more Slovaks consider themselves Christians while most Czechs consider themselves areligious. I also wonder whether the crushing of the Hussite rebellion led to some religious differences between the two regions, given that Catholicism was in part imposed on Bohemia. Is Slovakian Catholicism at all influenced by Orthodoxy? And what about the lost Czechoslovaks, the Transcarpathians? They were made into Ukrainians after WWII.
@@charlesiragui2473but why were they integrated into Ukraine? What happened to the tail that Slovakia had until WWII when they were given to Ukraine?
@@therealspeedwagon1451 I'm not sure about the rationales from Stalin's perspective. It is true that linguistically the Rusyns speak a Slavic language considered to be Eastern Slavic and many other Rusyns lived inside pre-war Poland too, on the other side of the Carpathians (the part of Poland was incorporated into Soviet Ukraine as well). The people of Transcarpathia also tend to be Eastern Orthodox, more so than others in western Ukraine, so from a cultural standpoint combining this territory with Ukraine/Russia made some sense. It's also true that Rusyns of Transcarpathia were not sure what to do after WWI when both Austria-Hungary and Hungary collapsed into ethnic states. Independence wasn't feasible. So apparently 2/3 of the Rusyns voted to join Czechoslovakia. I would love to hear Knowledgia handle this.
@@therealspeedwagon1451 because Stalin. Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania lost territories to USSR.
When you break with your ex but there was no break up drama because both wanted different paths, but you still like her and like to hang out with her occasionally
Exactly that! It's like switching from relationship into friends with benefits! That's how you can describe the situation.
Better good friendship than bad marriage.
The problem with you analogy is briefly mentioned in the video at around 7:50. It was a political and not a popular decision. If it was given as a referendum question, it would have never passed and we would have Czechoslovakia to this day.
So if you want your analogy to work, it should be something like "parents of the young couple decided that they are not good for each other so with tears on both sides they parted but stayed friends".
To be fair - there was a part of a population that wanted the split - in Slovakia mostly because of nationalist tendencies and feelings their voice is not strong enough in the federation, but some also in Czechia, because they felt that they are pulling Slovakia (funds were flowing more from west to east).
@@petrkubena The minority is always the loudest. That's why at the time it seemed that the dissolusion as popular even tho it wasn't.
So a cuck basically? yuck
Back in 2010 I met a young Slovak woman. I asked her, 10 years after the fact, did she think that the Velvet Divorce was a good thing or a bad thing. Her response was "We make better neighbors than roommates." ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
well said
I love the emoji created from the keyboard !!
Kaomoji normie
@@TheGecko213 normie
How do you create the middle part of your "emoji" at the end of your comment, pls?
As a Slovak, when I cross Czech border I never feel like I am in a foreign country.
There is one more country where I experience the same, it's Poland.
🇨🇿🤝🏻🇸🇰🤝🏻🇵🇱
🤝CZ👋PL🤝SK
I leaned to skate and play hockey by a young Czech skating coach. I remember calling him a Czechoslovakian and he rolled around the ice laughing. Good memories, thank you for everything Pavel my old Czech coach!
For what I’ve read and investigated, Czechs and Slovaks are basically brothers that are also the best of friends, they just moved to different but neighbouring homes but still see and talk to each other every day. 🇸🇰🇨🇿
Wait there are brothers who arent best friends?
What happened to the Moravians, the central part of the former Czechoslovakia?
@@Dutch_Uncle they resent being called czech (as they always did), but they're entirely too lazy to actually separate... they can handle the nagging, so long as they don't actually have to make decisions themselves lol.
The lazyness is present in all of us... so when the politicians decided to separate into 2 countries, the people were like "Dude! Uncool"... but as always, people were too damn passive to do something about it. It's a small miracle we're not still enslaved by Hungarians to work their farms (which we basically were for around 1000 years)
@@ytubestolemyhandle Thanks, "Moravian" in contemporary US usage indicates a religious group of protestants. In the 1870-1890 period there was substantial emigration of "Bohemians" to the Great Plains of the US, Nebraska to Texas. Their language was described by them and their neighbors as "Bohemian," and the term "Czech" was not used until after WWI.
I attended a Slovak event and was told that Slovak nationalism arose when Hungarian replaced Latin as the language of the courts, the schools, and public administration.
From what I read, the average Czech and Slovak didn't really care that much about being in the same state or having their own states. The split was really just caused by the politicians thinking this is what's best
(Slovak here)
Let me add a few important facts that were omitted in the video that help explain the separation more in depth:
1. Both countries had different historical background: while Czechs had their own kingdom, even though subjugated by larger empires as Holy Roman Empire or Austrio-Hungarian empire, Slovaks were completely absorbed by the Hungarian kingdom. This resulted in different goals of national elites during period of romanticism, when the concept of nationality began to truly form: while Czechs wanted more political freedom, Slovaks wanted their own state - this was met with harsh rebuke from Hungarians who tried to erase Slovak nationality altogether by committing technically a cultural genocide: closed schools that taught Slovak language, imprisoned Slovak political activists, abducted children for re-education in Hungary, the police even dispersed protests by killing protesters.
2. Due to these differences, after the collapse of Austro-Hungarian empire and when creation of Czechoslovakia was being negotiated in the US, Masaryk (representing Czechs) promised Stefanik (who represented Slovaks) that Czechoslovakia would be a federation of two separate states, with separate legislature (much like US but on much smaller scale).
Masaryk agreed but after the tragic death of Stefanik, he broke the promise, fearing the huge German minority in Czech part of Czechoslovakia and decided to create a unified state. This led to Germans becoming a much smaller minority compared to the total population and so their political power over Czech part diminished. This is why both Slovaks and Germans felt cheated and when Hitler rose to power, Germans wanted to join Germany and Slovaks wanted their independent state. And so Slovakia betrayed Czechs (who had been selflessly uplifting the much more impoverished and less industrially advanced Slovakia for years) and agreed with Munich agreement - they joined Hitler and left Czechs to be partly consumed and partly occupied by Germany.
3. After the war, the differences between Czechia and Slovakia in terms of industrialization continued to show in wages - Czechs have been always wealthier and this built up tensions on both sides: some Czechs complained that Slovaks are holding Czechia back while Slovaks thought that Czechia was neglecting development of Slovakia (they took difference in wages as proof)
4. After the fall of socialist regime, both countries had their own prime minister and while Czech prime minister was super eager to privatize and build a free market economy, Slovak prime minister was a very nationalistic goon (Meciar) who privatized state companies by basically giving them to his friends. So Czech politicians were glad they didn't have to negotiate with Slovak nationalists and Slovak prime minister had his own state that he almost totally captured for years to come.
So in short - war was out of the question - even if Czechs prevailed the population would vote for even more radical nationalists and politicians were afraid of another Yugoslavia-style civil war + the brotherly relationship between the two made it almost impossible to convince the population to fight on either side (although not completely as can be seen in Ukraine today) and so Czechs decided to simply let go of their toxic neighbor - win-win situation for both sides.
Thankfully, Slovakia, for the majority of it's population, has grown out of the childish nationalism and got rid of the almost-dictator Meciar and got accepted into EU thanks to free market reforms.
This is the most accurate comment I have read here.
@@petrkarafiat1707 Thank you! :)
Shoulda read this comment and skipped the vid.
I think it should be noted at point 3 that this was not the case as when Czechoslovakia was formed about 90 % of its money came from Czech part and way more than 10 % was invested into Slovakia. So basically part of the money gained in Czechia was going to Slovakia. And throughout the history the gradient did not change. This lead to quicker development of Slovakia and the difference between the countries got smaller and smaller and smaller as the time went on. If they did not split, I think western half of Slovakia would have pretty much the same level as Moravia (eastern half of Czechia) by now. But as you hint at point 4, privatization and rush to build market economy and rebuild the market did not go that well in Slovakia. Also Id argue Czechia has better geographical position to build strong economy (though both of them kinda suck and are landlocked).
Sadly in last few years Slovakia is not doing that well and the process of catching up to Czechia even reverted. I personally think it is the direct result of the late Slovak governments which to an outsider interested in Slovak politics feels like a fight between various groups of populists or nationalists while more moderate parties/voters just have to watch.
@@fridericusrex6289 I totally agree - Czechs mounted an enormous effort to uplift Slovaks in many ways but unfortunately Slovaks had different expectations - very similar in fact to the current popular opinions concerning EU, that is not improvements in education, infrastructure etc. but a raise in salaries is what really matters (to them).
Despite all the heroic efforts, Czechs could not force development of Slovak economy to catch up with the Czech one, as Czech economy never stopped growing and the gap remained the same at best - pretty much as the race to catch up with the Western Europe nowadays.
Well, I would sum up Slovak politics like this:
Super populist Mečiar got beaten by a super right-wing coalition (SDKU) - that super right-wing coalition passed critical reforms that basically catapulted Slovakia into EU, NATO and earned Slovakia nickname Tiger from under Hight Tatras mountains as our economy growth outpaced everyone, including Czech Republic.
Those reforms also targeted public spending and populists along with nationalists criticized those heavily + there was this leak from Slovak secret service about heads of the right-wing coalition taking bribes from companies that privatized state companies (Gorila) -
this lead to populists beating the super-coalition so much that one populist party had the parliamentary majority - and that's when the growth stopped as many reforms were thwarted and state capture began - the entire justice department along with the police force got corrupted almost through and through as contemporary investigations have been revealing past 2 years. When one of the investigative journalists Jan Kuciak and his fiancée got killed by a hitman, the populist parties lost trust of the people and the loudest anti-corruption movement won the elections - unfortunately, that movement is also super--populistic but also combined with ultra-conservative Catholics which makes matters even worse. These anti-corruption populists found themselves in a crisis after crisis though (Covid, then war in Ukraine and energy crisis and then inflation) and unfortunately proved to be totally inapt to deal with any of them.
You are right that our centrists and non-populists have always stood aside with little to no power: our libertarian party always had only a minority in parliament and our progressive party did not even get into the parliament by ridiculous 1000 votes, because they alone respected the law about coalitions (raising the minimum % of votes) and they also botched their campaign few days before the elections...
Nevertheless I see similar patterns in Czech Republic - right-wing ODS and their coalitions and populist ČSSD taking turns to rule - periods of reforms and progress and periods of debt growth and stagnation...
I"m from Slovenia and i can only say that the way Czech and Slovak split was really civilized..unlike Yugoslavia, which Slovenia was part off! I must say that i really love both nations, Czech and Slovaks. They have almost identical language, but not the same! As Slovene i can understand Slovak a bit more than Czech!
oh so effectively like a different dialect
There was no war because
1) we are too lazy for that
2) people didn't know about that, they just woke up one day and Czechoslovakia was no more, so people were like "ok" and that was all 😀
Slovak people have more possibility with Hungary together.
@@Ftibor7 in what way? the cultures different, the language is too
@@kralkralovsky8416 The culture is same the languages only are different.
I'm from the czech republic and I see it as a big mistake . At the time neither populations really wanted it and it happend more due to apathy then anything of course . I would be for Czechoslovakia reuniting any day , but only if it was due to a fair democratic referendum ; forcing the Slovaks into czechslovakia would not be the right thing
There could be a federal unity, as in Canadian provinces. And another way to look at it would be like a local EU-isation.
I'm from Slovakia and I've never seen how Czechoslovakia works, but I think we shouldn't have split up. There are differences, but to me it's the same as someone from Bayern having a slightly different dialect and culture than someone from Lower Saxony. For me, Czechs are the same as Slovaks.
Maybe, but there is no need to worry about it anymore. All is well that ends well.
Don’t worry, countries are unifying again. Soon Russia will unite with Ukraine too and you will as well
@@MrPeterPan What a joke. The situation is not at all comparable. People in this specific thread are for peaceful unification. When both parties are in favor of union. Russia is not unifying with Ukraine, it is invading it. And failing horribly at that. Go back into your hole.
In fact, more than 80% of people in both countries were against the division of Czechoslovakia. However, the politicians ignored it and decided not to ask the people at all. At the same time, none of the ruling political parties at the time had division in their program. I remember how we couldn't believe ,until the last moment, that they were serious and would actually do it...
Not true. Most Slovaks wanted the separation at that time... And it was inevitable to happen. Without the actual separation, large part of Slovak political scene would be obsessed about inciting tensions between Slovaks and Czech. With the actual separation, these nationalists lost the main reason to exist... We are very lucky that the separation was peaceful.
@@vladimirkraus1438 Not true. In 1918 slowaks wanted separation from hungary and help founded czechoslowakia. Without it, slowak state would not even existed and in some time slowaks may ended like polabian sorbs.... In fact, even the slowak secession from Czechoslovakia was forced by Germany. Volunteers from Bohemia and Moravia even had to "occupy" Slovakia by force because the Hungarian administration there refused to recognize international agreements. Separatits were, in fact, all the time of czechoslowakian existence in minority. Even in 1992 80% of slowakian citizens were against separation! I experienced it and I still remember it well, so don't try to lie to me here!
Love you both from Polska 🇵🇱
You mean Polish Soviet Socialist Republic?
@@notoriousfly9260 You mean Polish People's Republic? (Poland was never part of the USSR)
Dziękuję bardzo z Republiki Czeskiej👍👋
It was interesting to see this. I remembered Czechoslovakia from history classes and therefore ai was curious about what has happened to it.
I have been to both Slovakia and the Czech Republic a couple of times and for some reason, I liked both countries 🇨🇿🇸🇰 and am happy to visit Slovakia as it is our neighbour.
As a Hungarian, I am happy if our countries maintain good relations, and mutual acceptance instead of confrontation.
That's hard to do with Orbán, he only makes enemies around him. During his government, the interest in cooperation with HU declined a lot.
@@mari.be.86 But please, don't judge the whole nation based on this... Orbán won back in 2010 because the previous leadership almost bankrupt the country, and after this, real opposition was not existed, because most of us just don't want back the previous system too... so we just stuck to choose between "Douche and Turd"... 😪
I believe the real reason for the separation was the fact that after the fall of the communist regime the Slovak politicians connected to „interested parties“ wanted to have their own privatization of the state property/companies that were in the Slovak area and therefore have better opportunities of taking control of them. I mean in both countries Czech Republic and Slovakia there were some wild and heavy transfers of huge wealth from state entities to private hands. So, in conclusion I would say, „greed of few has decided the fate of many“.
My wife is from Slovakia and I asked her and her family why. It wasn't that they disliked the Czech they just felt the government spent all the money in the Czech part of the country and they got little.
Her family was very much in favour of the separation.
I've spent a lot of time in both countries and can say Czech Republic is alot more developed than Slovakia.
That is true as Czechia was basically factory of whole Austria-Hungary (and wallet of Vienna) and Slovakia was mostly agrarian part of Hungary, so there was big difference between various parts of the country from the beginning. (Not to mention Carpathian Ruthenia that was part of Czechoslovakia during interwar period which was basically stuck in some 17-18th century.) And as well most easily accessible deposits of Coal were in Czech part of Czechoslovakia, so the industry and country was developing from early 19th century.
Czech lands in Austrian-Hungarian empire wer higly industralized, whereas Slovakia was neglected and greatly rural in the part of the empire ruled by Hungarians. After the formation of Czechoslovakia in 1918, there wa a lots of effort to help not only Slovakia'economy, but also its state administartion an education. A great effort was made to industralize Slovakia especially after the WW2. The propaganda given above was spread by some politicians
one thing I found interesting in my reading is the manner in which the Czechs used their political sway in the a/h empire to suppress the Slovak language and culture.
@@cones914 The government gave up on highway on flat land and instead pushes it into hills where they need excessive bridges and tunnels to dig. 1km there cost multiple kms on flat lands so it is unreasonable, they can finish the southern highway much faster than move to the hills but nah
As a son of Yugoslavians, it was the same here, everything went into Serbia while we were there to make money for Serbia to spend
They did a phenomenal job symbolizing the peaceful separation during the last minutes of the Czechoslovak Television/ČST channel back on December 31, 1992. They played a song called Sbohem Slovensko (Goodbye Slovakia) with a man who represents the Czechs and a woman who represents the Slovaks. There's a long arm connecting them together to represent the unity. They're in a court filing for a divorce, the Slovak wanted it while the Czech was just chilling and didn't care what was going on. Then the court favored the Slovak and a guy with a long beard came in with a chainsaw to separate the long arm, which released Czechoslovak coins (to represent the currency's fall). They turned into children to represent that they're now young nations.
In the song, they say "Uvidíš bez nich, bude ti líp. Sbohem, Slovensko, bude ti líp." which in Czech means "You'll see without them, you'll be better. Goodbye, Slovakia, you'll be better." and keep repeating "Goodbye, Slovakia, you'll be better."
According to what you said and how there was no referandum it makes me think the real reason the head of the regions decided to split was that they wanted more power for themselves.
thats how it was, no referandum, no questions, just some few guys wanting more power for themselfs, i think i am not the only one of this opinion but i am from slovakia and i think that if i was born into czechoslovakia i wouldnt mind but i'm glad to be just slovak today
Obviously politicians. It is better to be a king in a small kingdom thena a duke under the king of a bigger kingdom..
Maybe like this!! In a united country I'm a politician, but in a divided country I might make president. Easy choice. Lemos, patronage, honor guards, and international travel. Medium sized frog in a small pond.🤣🤣🤣
This is exactly what happened!
That but also the fact that at the time democracy was still young and referendum weren't as common as today. It was more like that people voted their representatives to their government to make collective decisions for everybody. It was the time when e.g. president was voted by government not citizens.
Imagine a united Czech and Slovak junior hockey team = powerhouse!
In such team will play max. 2-3 Slovaks and the trainer will be a Czech as usually. So was the reality.
@@adriangrunert513 Do you really wonder? Who went to further lengths in Ice hockey after separation? The talent was CLEARLY on the czech sides of things. That is historically objective truth. To represent is to earn it and the players did.
Czech nature is to stay calm as long as possible. Dont't fight and wait what happens. Because you don't want any trouble. Just have another cold beer.
Having another cold beer is just the right time to gripe. :-))
Thank you for this video. As a Slovak living in Czechia, I don't think the nations need to be separated, and they really are not, but since we are connected by pretty much everything but flag and law, I'm happy with the arrangement. It is better for the parts to be self and still connected to the whole, than to be forcefully part of one self. I would say our divorce is the one of, if not the best, examples of how peaceful disolutions can work. We still share the same culture, we still talk to each other, and yet we can grow in our own way.
Fun fact is that czechoslivaks wasnt nation. It was fake nation due to huge amount of germans in CS and hungarians. If slovaks would have some rights then german would ask for them to also hungarians. So fake CS nation was created. Also CSR ment to be federal republic like the USA which never happend and czech look at slovakia as part of czech lands not as same nation.
@@ejo5336 German-speaking Czechs, more like :D As much as Hitler loved to play the nationality card to help destabilize Czechoslovakia, the Czech Germans were treated far worse under his government than the Czech one (even more so than "East Germans" - back then mostly meaning the Germanized Slavs, rather than the more modern "post-communist Germans"). There were some very visible differences in religious practices and bits of culture, but other than that and the language, they were rather Czech. Heck, most of the Czech Germans (a non-negligible fraction of whom were Jews, of course) volunteered for the army when it seemed like the government might chose to defend the country from Hitler.
But yeah, the interwar republic was certainly rather imperialistically moulded. The promised federation failed to shape up and kept getting delayed, territorial squabbles kept jeopardising relationship with key potential allies... and the whole republic was rather less democratic than it tried to appear even if you ignore the underrepresentation of "minorities" - the president's influence was far too strong. But of course, compared to the neighbours...
@@ejo5336 Who's to say whether a country deserves to exist or not
@@ejo5336 well that's a complicated topic. Czechs never really considered Slovakia "Czech lands". They were simply naturally a dominant nationality of the state, which officially didn't recognize the two as separate nationalities. Czechia was also much economically stronger. The truth is, to this day Czechs are prouder of the Czechoslovakian heritage than Slovakians. However, Slovakians reached what they wanted after WW1. They got separated from Hungary, could speak their language and develop their culture with no issues, and the investments of Czechoslovakia gave them the very option to exist as an independent country.
@@tomasmalin that is the main fact. Slovakia never had rights as it was agreed. As you said slovaks got what they want same as czech as they was kept under german control. There is a possibility slovakia may wouldnt exist but czechia same borders as we know them now. It would be possible as it was in protectorat. Both nations needed each other. Slovakia was agrear and rural compare to czechia. Separation only help slovakia in grow. Czechia is in better condition of course as when split happend czech had 75% of EU GDP and slovakia 50%. Czech was in profit and slovakia in deficit. Provement was currency as when countries separate course was 1:1. Also slovakia got Meciar who put it down and 90s was hard compare to czech so slovakia lost 7-10 years + 12 years of Fico. But even in this time makes huge progress compare to czechia. Atm each countries cowork and are best friends at least in Europe which is great. In same countries there would blame each other as in past or as moravia blame bohemia or prague or eastern slovakia blame bratislava and west slovakia.
I asked a Prague cabdriver what he thought of the breakup, his response was "let them go, they can't make a good beer". I knew then that there would be no problems.
This might be the most Czech response I have ever heard :D
Fun fact. Language between Czechia and Slovakia is very similar and and thanks to the dialects of Czech and Slovak there is no barrier, so it is very difficult to assign a dialect whether it is Czech or Slovak. The Moravian dialect is a little closer to Slovak, but it's completely at the border fluent
Here in the Yugoslav region we sometimes wonder why the hell we couldn't separate in the same civilized non bloody way as Czechoslovakia. I've lived in the Czech Republic for years and often visited Slovakia. Absolutely love both countries and the language is amazing. I'm not fluent in it but very happy I know and understand some of it.
the relations between the Serbs, Croats etc. were very different in comparison to C-S: we had no minority issues, no border issues, we never fought each other; actually, we had barely any significant touching points before establishing the Czechoslovak republic; most of the Slovaks had virtually no knowledge about the Czechs in 1918
By some members of former Yugoslavia living in my country, I don’t wonder at all. Even the generations that never saw Yugoslavia or the wars have pure hatred in their heart for their former brothers. It makes living with them a pain. But since I traveled to the region, I learned that those here are just bad examples living in the past .
@@odeode4338 It's really a mixed bag. Some people born after the war are way more hateful than some who actually lived through it.
@Al Pahlavi - I wonder the same. My theory is that this would work if every region was Slovenian-like (calm, basically nearer to Austria in culture than to rest of Balkan) or Bosnian-like (mixture of all nationalities and religions, so bit of less us-them tendencies and the famous "ethnic cleansing" mentality.
I am czech. My friend was serving in KFOR forces in Yugoslavia during war. I have seen many terrible terrible photos, heard terrible terrible stories from him. I am very sorry for you guys down there..
My cousin's live in Kosice and speak fluent Slovak they told me they understand Czech easily like it's not even a different language but a different dialect
Well of course as like 1000 years ago there was The Great Moravia where the ancestors of the modern Czechs, Moravians and Slovaks lived. That is why all these languages are somehow similar. For example as Slovak, I hardly understand Ukrainian and I do not understand Russian at all.
@@bes5164 how much of Polish can you understand?
My Slovak friend explained to me the same thing regarding the Czechs and Slovaks difference in dialects. She said they see themselves as cousins of the same tribe like Scots and Irish.
@@chrisklitou7573 quite a bit 50-60%
@@bes5164 it is possible to understand russian too, but because of their strong accent it's really hard.
As an Iranian who has just visited Slovakia, I got cool information from the video! Actually, the first part about the revolution and the protests for the death of a student was so familiar to me and reminded me of the current revolution in Iran and the people who started protesting for the death of a 22-year-old girl but then it got bigger and bigger and now people are fighting against the whole Islamic dictatorship in Iran.
Stále jsme bratři! 🇨🇿♥️🇸🇰
Ne, Slováci jsou nacisté a necivilizovaní ve srovnání s námi jsou to Maďaři
@@ximrade4287 ne všichni jsou Kotlebové. Taky máme Okamura a trikolóru
@@janhejcman Slováci žijí v zaostalém lesnatém národě, mají štěstí, že dokonce dostali svůj stát, kdyby Česko nebylo po revoluci, rozdrtili bychom každého Slováka protestujícího za nezávislost a teď by mluvili česky.
@@ximrade4287 kdyby každý Slovák mluvil česky tak bychom ztratili velké kulturní dědictví. Východ Slovenska je sice zaostalý, ale to neznamená že nejsme jakožto národy bratři. Kdybychom drtili lid přející si nezávislost tak bychom nebyli o nic lepší než komunisti před revolucí. Je jejich právo chtít a mít nezávislý stát. Jen bych o odtržení udělal referendum, spíše než ho prostě udělal.
@@janhejcman Slovensko bylo českou kolonií a mělo to tak zůstat, udělali pro nás a my jsme vybudovali jejich stát, jen kvůli Čechům Slovensko není na vývojové úrovni Moldavska nebo zničene Ukrajiny.
I wouldn't say Czechoslovakia 'collapsed' the two states amicably separated (The entire event being called the 'Velvet divorce') and both states have very cordial relations to this day - to the point both mutually celebrated the anniversary this January.
It's always interesting how our history is described from the "outside", and this was a pretty nice video! Also big kudos for the pronunciation of the names :)
Czechoslovakia did collapse but Altough there weren’t any bad problems with Slovakia and Czechia they are both peaceful and don’t fight each other
Thank you for this video, we will always love our Slovak brothers and sisters.
Altrough I do have one nitpic, that being that Masaryk was no longer the president in 1938 as he had resigned in 1935 and died in 1937
I had the chance to visit both countries, Czechia and Slovakia and like them a lot. But I have to admit that Prague was the best. Cheers.
Czech Republic views itself more like "Czechoslovakia without Slovakia" (we kept the old flag plus the foundation of Czechoslovakia in 1918 is our most important state holiday). Slovaks view 1993 as their final independence moment, a new quality.
Jako kdyby jsme vzali předchozí vlajku, tak by si nás lidi pletli s polskem. :D
Well tbf, never met a single person celebrating the creation of slovak republic in practice. State had introduced a lot of crap including it being a holiday while not having creation of czechoslovakia a state holiday, but it is not really what anyone wanted them to do, just like with the split, just no one asked. With regards to flag, it would probably make more sense if czechia and slovakia both adopted czechoslovak flag with emblems on them like moldova had.
@@starborneolympus3907 Exactly, we celebrate 1st of January as a New Year rather than an independence day. I've never heard of anyone celebrating that as such although most Slovaks I know are happy that we are not Czechoslovakia anymore.
Well, there was "the other" independent slovakian state and "independence moment" during the protectorate era .
@@decimusdecius7858 Nebo Indonesií.
Even divided we are still united Czechs and Slovaks are still brothers, families on both sides of borders.
Short explanation: both countries (their culture, history etc.) were developing separately for thousands of years
From Poland with love, to my czech and slovak Brothers and Sisters ❤
Woodrow Wilson is very loved in Czech Republic to this day. He allowed them to become independent when he had called for the dissolution of the Astro Hungarian empire in one of his 14 points. Prague main station was named after him.
@Drew Katon I know many Americans who regard WW as one of the very worst POTUS, ever.
He also promoted the KKK propaganda film birth of a nation
As a Czech i can tell you that we dont give a shit about Wilson. We just say T.G Masaryk created Czechoslovakia with American support and thats it.
Not really. Wilson is a footnote in our (Czech) history books and only few people would tell you what role did he play. It's maybe unfair, but that's the way it is.
Actually no. Much more people would name his love in racist cinema rather than support of creation of Czechoslovakia as one of his "signature moves":)
The split killed one joke: "What town is at the center of Czechoslovakia?" The reply "Oslo".
From Bangladesh, living in Germany, went to Czech for a vacation last summer. Told my dad I went to Czech Republic. He was so confused. Then I explained him its the Czechoslovakia. The country he knows are separate for 30 years. For him it was brand new infomation, because when he was in schools he only knew about Czechoslovakia. After he heard he went to literally wiki to know about the split.
I am very glad at least some people care and want to be informed. Unlike most Americans I've met.
Heh, you just inspired me to wiki the independence of Bangladesh. I am old enough to remember having a globe that had "East Pakistan" on it.
Go back to bangladesh..
@@thecringeinspector5636 Majority of mericans, yeah lol, but the very few who do, they're usually often more educated and possess more knowledge compared to the average American.
Even Bangladesh got it's independence from Pakistan. So much for being a Muslim but then Bangladeshis were treated worst by Pakistani Army (who did genocide of 3-million Bengalis).
But in reality, both sides of Indian West Bengal state and Bangladeshis speak the same Bengali language.
There actually is a very good reason why Slovaks felt like splitting and most Czechs or even Slovaks don't really get it until this day (or can't verbalise it). I for sure didn't for a very long time and kinda thought that Slovaks were dumb for wanting to split. But I was wrong.
There's ~ 10 million Czechs (like myself) and ~ 5 million Slovaks. They often like each other, no doubt. But there still is this ratio. When someone wants to publish a book, they go "meh, let's just do Czech version only, Slovaks can read Czech, they don't mind." and so it goes for everything. Czechs were the dominant culture in that common state and Slovaks and their language were _implicitly_ abused by the market forces and other biases. There was no _explicit_ law to "czechify" Slovaks, it just happens on its own. Like there wasn't any law to "gernanize" Czechs but it still happened, because why bother publishing a book in Czech when everyone speaks fluent German? Slovaks are still suffering from this because these forces didn't quite cease to exist and are not really going away so easily. But at least they have a country of their own, they safeguard their language and culture and they have no one to blame for their failures (but also no one to steal their thunder when they succeed).
We are EU now, we can love Slovaks all we want, we have open borders and everyone's better off. This video doesn't really explain how Slovaks felt and I'm sorry I thought that Slovaks were hysterical to split and I felt hurt like a scorned women. They weren't hysterical and good for them to go! I love them all the same
If you watched the video, it is clearly stated from 08:40 on...
@@PetrVita not even close enough. They basically say "there was a threat of germanization and hungarization, but then it wasn't an issue anymore and velvet revolution ..."
That doesn't explain how any of these "foreign-izations" even work and that they are often actually opposed by both the larger and the smaller cultures. As in, Austro-Hungarian empire was really forthcoming in supporting Czech culture, kaiser and family paid for a significant part of our National Theater (both before it burned and even more after it burned). But also were genuine big fans, kaiser visited the "Interim Theatre" on every visit and also visited the construction site of the future National Theatre. Meanwhile, it was portrayed as if Czechs were in fierce battle for it and paid for everything, in spite of evil Germanic forces. Never happened. Same goes for Czechs who possible paid "our" money to further Slovakian language and culture, only to see it still fighting for survival. It's not an explicit process and this video explains none of this and only obfuscates the situation by portraying it as a hostile and intentional clash of cultures.
@@miroslavhoudek7085 Really? The video clearly states "Czechs outnumbered and overpowered the Slovaks within the union, but they had been the lesser of two evils..." And that is exactly the point you made with your original comment.
The creation of Czechoslovakia by Masaryk and Stefanik was a marriage of the necessity to fight greater evils in 1918. That was not the threat present in 90's, and the split was a natural solution to the feeling of Slovaks being the lesser partner in the marriage. Many Czechs felt sad about Meciar suggesting we were not fair to them...
My family is more Diaspora Slovak and the miro comment is a great description. The Diaspora was more concerned with the differences than the countries. But because Diaspora tries to preserve some homeland culture outside the country it is sensitive to losing it's identity. That does not make bad feelings, it just made Slovak Diaspora worry more about being lost.
As an aside the restoration of old Prague is truly special. And now we see similar efforts starting in Bratislava. Both cities are becoming fantastic cites in Europe. Prague is more complete of course. But Bratislava is affordable and ... well Slovakian. 🙂
There was no "explicit" law to germanize Czechs? So the forced recatolisation, centralisation - schools and offices only in German language, persecution of personalities of Czech national movement, was not "explicit"? :D Neither was the one in WW2, right?
Well explained, as a Czech, I approve this mini-documentary, even the pronounciation of the czech names and words was accurate. :) Greetings from CZ! ;)
We never know this history in our school history books in Vietnam 🇻🇳 😬😬 Thank you host for sharing 🌹
Fun fact we have a lot of Vietnamese in Czech republic. They mostly own shops in small cities or villages
@@martinvyslouzil2163 It would be just polite to learn something about their country aswell haha
@@kanga-ross i know some things about their country dont worry.
@@martinvyslouzil2163 i meant in general, in schools
what lớp do you learn about European history in Vietnam? (I left after 4th grade)
I have many Slovak and Czech friends and when I've asked why they separated they don't seem to know. Now I know why, it wasn't their decision, they were never asked !
It's not the true. There were election. And in Slovakia the politicians, which wanted to keep Czecoslovakia togather, was defeated. You need to ask people which remember that time.
@@julm7744
That's a very good point, it's the same in Scotland with the SNP. Not all their supporters want to seperate from the UK, people vote for parties on lots of issues, not just one. Only in a Referendum do you have one issue to vote on.
@@johnbrereton5229 I think you Scots should totally go independent mate
@@SaturnineXTS
Well, that's not the opinion of the majority of Scots, it's just the noisy minority that think that.
Pretty good summary. Except the title is a little misleading. Czechoslovakia DID NOT "collapse". It didn't even "fall apart" I dare to say (0:31). It simply split in a peaceful, planned and organized manner.
As an Australian it’s not uncommon for people to refer to Czechia and Slovakia as “Czechoslovakia”. I always wondered why the two separated, but I’m glad to see that their still remains friendship between the two. I guess it’s somewhat similar to us and New Zealand.
I misread your first sentence as saying you're Austrian and then when you said New Zealand I was like wut then I went and reread the sentence
Yeah if almost every Australian has some family in New Zealand and vice versa.
Czechia tends to be more liberal (the bohemian part at least) and Slovakia more conservative (excluding the capital). Slovaks are perceived as more passionate and hot headed and Czechs as more fatalistic and phlegmatic.
@@aidenbooksmith2351 austro-kiwi empire
🦘 🥝
Austrian alien = Australien
People were against the separation. My parents grew up in those times. Politicians wanted to fill their pockets simple as that. People protested against the separation. After things started getting privatized after the collapse of the soviet Union. It all kicked of. Politicians and their families became the richest in the country. They split so they could have more people in power.
"Politicians wanted to fill their pockets simple as that." stup-id popular mantra of ignorant citizens
Czechoslovakia was made due to the power vacuum left from Austria Hungary. The allies felt if there where too many small nations they would be eaten up in piecemeal by countries like Germany. It's also why Yugoslavia was created, and why Romania got all of Transylvania. They where supposed to create a little entente that would appose foreign intervention
In part it was bc of that, in part bc of ethnic and language similarities and because they wanted a cordon sanitaire to contain communism
A collection of thoughtful, positive comments from a wide range of sources must be one of the greatest compliments a YT video can receive. This was a pleasure to see, hear and read.
My Mother’s Family are ethnic Czech, my Father’s Slovak. I miss being able to say I’m Czechoslovakian.
No such person !
You still call yourself Czechoslovak as one parent is Czech and other is Slovak so you're Czech-Slovak :)
My ancestry is Slovak and of course I'm sure I have Czech ancestry.
They are brothers who just decided to live in different houses.... but they still wanted to be neighbours.
That is a very nice description of today's status actually! (Slovak here)
The Czech Republic and Slovakia is a rare example of peace despite separation. It's the people who needs appreciation than leaders
Hello from Slovenia. The thing that matters the most is that separation was peaceful without war. That is the most important
Well if the politicians tried to send us fight each other we would just get drunk together and make fun of the politicians 😅
I don’t see Czechoslovakia as a country that collapsed but rather 2 countries that held a peaceful National Divorce
And more countries could learn a thing or two from them
you can´t learn this; there have to be favourable preconditions
That was a really informative & great video that helped me learn & understand better about the Czech Republic & Slovakia.
In fact, this video was weak with some misinterpretations.
If you are interested in the topic and I can recommend a video called ‘VELVET DIVORCE after 30 years‘ by @DreamPrague
There was feeling among Slovaks they would be happier alone. And as freely as we join together we separated. This way our love for each other nations didn't die.
Fantastic video keep it up your doing amazing job
Amazing. Well-Put. High quality. Much Obliged!
When a child grows up, becomes independent and starts his own family and a new home, this is not the collapse of the original family. That is the culmination of its meaning.
Czechoslovakia didn't "collapse". It's just that Slovakia wanted to be independent, that's all. I lived there during the transition (1991-92). It was not such a traumatic thing but really quite - I would say - "friendly".
Czech Republic and Slovakia are great example how two countries who were unified can separate peacefully, still work together with respecting each other, and more importantly make progress in every aspect. They can serve us as a model of what this world needs.
Great video by the way. I love your visual effects. 😊
There's like 2000yrs of history to learn to really understand the region
Thats the same for almost every region on the planet.
More like 100, maybe 500?
@@martinvyslouzil2163 True. Bohemia in particular though has a far richer and more impactful history than someone might think considering where they sit in the grand scheme of things today.
@@HandlesAreDumb420 1500
@@martinvyslouzil2163 not really, Europe is a very unique continent in that regard.
Interesting story to be told!
I used to live in Slovakia during 2016 - 2018 and during that time I did notice a significant difference between Czechs and Slovaks, also between Moravian and Bohemian Czechs and Western and Eastern Slovaks.
If you go to Presov, Humenne, Kosice or Poprad you will see a very poor side of Slovakia. Unlike Nitra, Trnava, Trencin, Bratislava and even Galanta where they have a lot of businesses, especially in the field of logistics. Lots of warehouses and goods to be transported with a good highway.
Meanwhile, Banska Bystrica, Zilina, Ziar nad Hronom and Zvolen which are located in the center of the country as well as Brezno keep a very hidden, very interesting mountain culture. I believe Ruzomberok, Spisska Nova Ves and Liptovsky Mikulas too, although I haven't been in these cities yet.
There would be differences between people living in Prague and in a small village, there would be differences between Bavarians in the mountains and Berliners, or between people I already mentioned above.
My family heritage is from Krasna Luka and Hertnik.I have researched these two towns and find them to be somewhat on the poor side. Do you know where these small towns are located? Would you recommend someone with 100% slovak blood to visit there? I am certain I still have distant family living in these towns.
@@christinepalsa6307 sure if you have a good liver and aren't afraid of gaining some weight because Slovaks are very welcoming people who love getting their relations drunk and stuffed full of delicious food when they visit.
Interesting observation!!But true!!Too late to do anything but my view is that they should stay together and build strong economic identity!!!Love them both!!!
@@christinepalsa6307 Hey, I see Krasna Luka is close to Stara Lubovna in the wider Poprad/ Eastern Tatras/Zamagurie region and Sabinov. Unfortunately I have never been in that area in particular as was too far away from where I used to live (Trnava) and not very easy to reach with public transport. My flatmate was from Kezmarok and he was a terrible person, used to live with him forcefully by my employer for almost a year and so that also had contributed to me not going there.
But this year or somewhere in the future I may consider a trip there, why not?
Very beautifully crafted, I'm from the Czech Republic 😊😊😊
I thought that the PM and the head of the Slovak parties got together to have dinner and a few drinks to sort out a couple of problems. As the evening wore on, the few became many, and they began joking about splitting the country as a solution. Things became rather fuzzy after that, but when they recovered from their hangovers they discovered that they had actually done it. Papers signed, borders drawn on a map, and so forth. It was too late to say “We didn’t mean it “.
As a Czech, I like your story. It certainly felt like something similar has happened as out of the blue, with no tensions among regular population, we were told we are separated by a border.
Talking about Czechoslovakia brings tears to my eyes even thou I have been born already in Czech Republic. Poor thing we are not one anymore. But that´s what Slovaks wanted
I know it is not a good time to bring it up, but I would like to see that Zakarpatie - part of today´s Ukraine was Czechoslovakia too!
We didn’t exactly want it, It was mostly a political motive. In most polls on the topic of break-up most people were in favor of staying together
Not really collapsed, but more like:
Slovakia: "Hey, I like you, but I want to leave now."
Czechia: "Yeah, okay. Here's your half of everything, and you can go."
Slovakia: "Thanks fam. We still friends?"
Czechia: "Heck yeah man. Have fun being independent my dude."
*Slovakia left the chat*
Exactly !
The soviets brutalized them for 45 years. I think economically unification would have been better for the average person in both countries.
Thank you for this video. After 30 years this peacfull separation proves that two sovereign nations can be closer in two different states then within one. I wish this example was followed by others.
I'm Argentinian, I have Czech ancestors from Moravia and I would love to visit both countries and learn the language in the future.
Good summary. Kudos to the author.
Slováci jsou naši bratři. Je škoda, že slovenštinu slýchám už jenom v práci.
To my to máme všetko ľahšie, nakoľko Čechov je viac a teda, skôr je vždy český dabing alebo české titulky než slovenské. :D :D
See? This is how fluently and without any problems Czechs and Slovaks communicate.
I don't know why but whenever I get to talk or work with Slovak I get so happy and excited. For some reason it's bring me joy talking with themm which might be because I really enjoy teh way their language sounds
Dubcek wanted to build "socialism with a human face". This is interesting in two ways - 1) yes, socialism doesnt have a human face, it was terror. 2) When Dubcek tried these reforms, ruZZians quickly invaded our country and we were occupied for 20 years. Ruzzians don't support anything human to this days. This is why most Czechs support Ukraine. We have a personal experience of russian occupation and terror.
Czechoslovakia was the coolest country name before it split up. It was always used in spelling contest in school.
Hi.. great video & illustrations. One feedback: It would be nice and highly appreciated to use date-month-year format whenever dates are shown as most people & most countries in the world always uses such better format. For instance: 17 June 2025 or 17/06/2025 ; 02 April 2024 or 02/04/2024 etc. It follows logical time sequent from the most frequent changes (the date) which is usually the first necessary thing to know, to the least (the year). In addition, it eliminated comma (,) and clearer. For example 20 April 2024 is much clearer at a glance than April 20,2024 Thank you and best wishes,
I'm American but my maternal side fled Czechoslovakia. Czech, Slovak & English were all spoken in unison in our household and we are ethnically Czech & Slovak. We originated in a village called Svincany, Bohemia, but Slovakia is not far, Moravia is very near. So I personally don't have any distinction & still use the title Czechoslovakia because that's what I will always think of my family's nation as being. I am not going to use one or the other. I've heard Czechia being coined a lot now, but that's pronounced oddly & nobody has a clue where you're talking about!! Or they think you're referring to Chechnya which is frowned upon here in Massachusetts due to the bombers who were from there. They are seen as Muslim & the kind of immigrants people don't want here. When you say "Czechia", people don't have a clue but when you say Czechoslovakia, they do!! Despite some younger generations not being around when Czechoslovakia existed. An in my family we call ourselves Bohemians, and identify as both a mix of Czech & Slovak & either refer to our land of origins as Bohemia (the old empire), or Czechoslovakia. You could say we're stuck in the past but we knew if you wanted to pursue better in life, you leave. We still have a branch or wing out in Siberia, as many Slavic & people's do to which goes back to when the USSR hunted people and cast them out to internment prisons. We have some extended family in Ukraine, from when Czechoslovakia was helping with deforestation & advancement in industrialization in Ukraine in between the wars. An none of the other references to the two countries (Czech Republic/Slovakia), sound right when you are of both ethnically speaking. We don't even consider them two separate nations. That was mainly a financially motivated decision to which we don't recognize. These politicians can create all the messes they desire & for whatever agenda's they might have, but you only have to see things the way YOU decide to see them.
Bohemia for the win!!!!
I am Czech (or rather Moravian) with Slovakian ancestry and I don't think we are not separate nations. Slovaks have always had a bit different mindset, which is normal since they were developing under different influences. Czechoslovakia was rather an attempt to escape oppression and gain our independency, which we have achieved, but there's no reason to keep it alive by force.
Thanks for the story. You sound like the expert on the subject. My grandfather is from Seilnica Liptov Slovensko. He immigrated to the US in 1910 when he was 14 years old. He wrote the story of his journey and the life he left. Not to get into it but it his story sounds like he was an indentured servant. At that time was serfdom practiced in that area of Slovakia?
My grandmother's father immigrated from czechoslovakia as well but the city is now located in Ukraine. Was the far west part of Ukraine once czechoslovakia?
I must disagree here. For us czechs, nothing really changed in past centuries. Kingdom known as Kingdom of Bohemia, or by it´s official name "Lands of Bohemian Crown" is in our language called "Czech Kingdom" or "Lands of Czech Crown" So we don´t feel like "young" nation. We are czechs who were in Central Europe for more then 1000 years. Slovaks on the other hand, were slavic part of Kingdom of Hungary. Yes, both our nations were part of Great Moravia in 9. century, but so were others west slavic comunities. Since then, we Czechs had our own Kingdom, where slovaks were part of Kingdom of Hungary. Yes, we were autonomous part of Holy Roman Empire, and then not really by choice autonomous part of Austro-Hungarian Empire, but we still kept our nation identity and partial sovereignty. Slovaks didn´t felt to be Hungarians also, so they leant towards us, during both nations National Revival they created similar language (from mix of protoslavics, moravian and czech) but their traditions, mentality and customs were totally different. Slovaks don´t like hearing it, but their mentality and customs are more hungarian when czech customs (and this we don´t like to agree with) are influenced by Germany, or in some parts by Poland. With mentalities and values it is similar situation. We created "Czechoslovakia" just to overwhelm Other nations present in our lands to be able to create "National Country" even tho, it was basically just fraud how to get support from other countries, United States included. As of now, opinions on whole spliting things differs. As for me, I am actually more leaning towards "pro-splitting" as i like to have my own country, not an confederation. There was country called Czechoslovakia, but there never was czechoslovakian nation. As for calling our countries Czechoslovakia, it is the same nonsense as calling, Greece Otoman Empire, Croatia Yugoslavia, Ukraine SSSR or Aliaska Russia.
@@lukasfelix6509 This is actually a great comment! I'm from Slovakia and I agree with the part that mentality and way of life might have been influenced by the Hungarians, only because mainly on the south parts of Slovakia there was a lot of Hungarians living there fo so long. And yes the country was called Czechoslovakia but on both ends there were Slovaks and Czechs living separately, minding their own traditions and business.
Czechoslovakia did not collapse. Both the Czech Republic and Slovakia are totally free electoral democracies, members of the European Union and participants in the Schengen Agreement of the European border control-free travel area. There is no compulsion, no hostility, and they are good neighbors. The way the Czech Republic and Slovakia split was really a civilized example that people in other parts of the world could learn from.
The Czech Kingdom has been here since about 1200 A.D. .... I have to smile every time someone says that the Czechs had their first state and they talk about the 20th century...
I’ve always wondered why 🇨🇿 is called by it’s official name ‘Czech Republic’ instead of Czechia, but nobody calls 🇸🇰 by its official name ‘Slovak Republic’ instead of Slovakia. 😂
Robavky because Czechia is harder to spell out and pronounce
Partly because 'Czechia' is such a god awful name, while Slovakia is fine and easier to say (than ‘Slovak Republic’).
Idk a single person who had a problem saying Czech Republic or Czechia
That's because of the Czech name. We never had a word for it. Before Czechoslovakia it was Čechy(Bohemia) but That's only like ⅔ of Czech republic. When other parts connected (Moravia&Silesia) it was Czechoslovakia so when we split in 1993 theword for our state "Česko" (Czechia) was made but it wasn't so popular and for some reason people preferred Czech republic
@@thegreatestoctopus9739
Czechia is pretty easy to say. It’s literally just “check-ia.”
The real confusion for english speakers is between Slovakia and Slovenia.Their flags are identical as well!
Not only for the English. I remember the Expo 2000 in Hannover, where the Slovakia was placed into the "Adriatic states" and Slovenia into the continental middle-Europe. Very funny. So the Slovak have got some sea for the first time, at least by mistake.
As a citizen of Slovakia let me tell you, many people were not happy with our new flag after separation. It looked too much like Russian. And I'm still unhappy with our flag as a state symbol. I think we should change it.
Excellent video, historically accurate, and I appreciate the narrator's attempt to Pronounce The Czech and Slovak names correctly. Well done!
1:00 Do you also consider Bohemia, Moravia and Slovakia, which were created in 1918 by the state of Czechoslovakia on the ruins of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, to be Eastern European?
My mother's parents came to the U.S. from Slovakia just before the First World War. Because of this I know something about the differences between Slovaks and Czechs. Slovakia is more rural than Bohemia, and the Czechs looked upon the Slovaks as country bumpkins, while the Slovaks looked upon the Czechs as snooty city slickers.
You are right about this - this was one of the reasons. The differencies in industry and economics were one of the more important aspects of the separation.
Both of my grandmothers were Slovak, my grandfather was Moravian. They came to the U.S. just before WW2, and I drove to my grandmother's village just north of Bratislava to meet her and my sister when I was stationed in Munich in 1990. I had to laugh when she told me to tell my relatively well-off Moravian relatives that I owned the to my eyes mundane Opel rental that I was driving. She had lived in the U.S. for over 50 years and ran a prosperous business with my grandfather and still had somewhat of a Slovak peasant girl inferiority complex when it came to her in-laws lol.
The city slickers in Prague think the Moravians are country bumpkins. 😂
Those who truly want to know the history of Europe, must include the spread of Christianity after 400 CE, up to the formation of the Holy Roman Empire, 800 CE, and which ended officially in 1806. This was followed by the German Confederation after the removal of Napoleon 1815. Prague not only served as the capitol of the HRE, but had served as the very seat of German intellectual culture, in both the HRE, and the German Confederation: Europe's first German university, was established in Prague, (It still exists there today). Sorry if I offend any Czech Nationalsts: Up to1920, German was the majority language in the city of Prague, (the same was true in Habsburg Budapest).
Historical roots: Ancient Bohemia was well known to the Ancient Pagan Romans. It was the land of the Bohi, a powerful Keltic kingdom, which Pagan Rome was never able to conquer. Pagan Rome made treaties with the Bohi, and the two lived in peace, and friendly trade. The punitive "treaties" of Versailles, St Germain, and Trianon, were designed trap millions of ethnic Germans behind foreign political borders, and break their influence in Central Europe.
The story of the three million rural Sudeten Germans is well known, so I do not need to go into detail. Well documented was the spread of Christianity throughout Central Europe, by German Knights. The story of the Teutonic Nights is well documented, and that of the leadership by the Habsburgs, which, especially during the 18th and 19th centuries, brought economic prosperity, modernized agriculture, and trade to these lands. Habsburg Catholic leadership was liberal, tolerant, and progressive. Laws against "Usuery", and prohibitions against "Profit Taking", and "Ungodly Technology", were dropped, in favor of economic growth.
It is proper to ask: "Why do "Yugo-Slavia", and Czecho-Slovakia" no longer exist?" In 1919 "Slovakia" was still 40% Hungarian. Bratislava Fortress was at the very center of Hungarian history, and culture. It was economically open and free, due it's location on the great Danube Trade Route. Nevertheless, the Hungarian Kingdom, which had existed for 1,000 years intact, was reduced by 3/4 of it territory, by punitive acts imposed upon it, after 1919-1920. Ask Hungarians today, what they think about all this: They have not forgotten. These historical facts apply to both 1920 created states. Millions of Hungarians were trapped and deprived of their property, and rights of citizenship by the creation of "Yugo-Slavia": The Vojvodina, is still home to a large Hungarian population. Large parts of today's Croatia, have deep Hungarian cultural roots as well. The exact same applies, of course, to Transylvania, (Romania). We are talking wholesale property loss, and expulsions: Factories, farms, villages, schools, and cities. It would not matter, if all Europeans were happy just to live together, and respect each other's rights. But the criminal actions committed against millions of blameless, by the acts of jealous revenge of 1919-1920, have unfortunately left scars behind. Perhaps justice will only be done when all internal borders in Europe are finally eliminated. (?).
In case of both Germans and Hungarians in those areas,they came there,they settled there and claim it to be their. Sudetenland was Czech for centuries and fact that Germans got an offer to move there didn´t make it their land,yet they tried to take it multiple times. Even in the first Czechoslovakian republic,Germans had quite a lot of power and privileges,especially in contrast to other minorities,yet they chose to betray the republic and expel Czechs from Sudetenland... by force.
(also German being main language in Prague in times of A-H wasn´t exactly thing that we wanted,it was kind of an expected effect of being under rule of Germans...)
I have small objection about "trapping behind foreign borders" border of Bohemia and Moravia were like that (save for several minor changes) for several centuries.
@@tefky7964 Czechs, Slovaks, and Hungarians all lived good under Habsburg leadership. Liberal Western Cultural (Catholic), values predominated, as opposed to the restrictive life style in Eastern Europe under Eastern Orthodox cultural dominance. Austria-Hungary was a free country, with a vibrant economy, and system of open borders, and international trade.
@@tefky7964 German language dominance was due to economic forces. The HRE, and German Confederation policies, benefitted all ethnic groups. None of these facts have anything to do with Nazis.
Totally agree. The First World War was a huge mistake for Europe. Central European countries would be 10 times stronger and richer if the Austrian empire still intact and it should. The nationalism movement was a trap to enslave the Central Europe developed by the French and English.
Greetings from România!🇹🇩🇨🇿🇸🇰 My grandma from my mother side was born in Czechoslovakia !
Clickbait title. The country didn't collapse, both parts peacefully decided to follows their individual paths. Democratic and honorable.
He's building, inappropriately, on the success of his video about Yugoslavia, where the word "collapse" is fair comment. I've commented on this before I saw your comment, and agree entirely
As a Czech few yeras ago I believed it was wrong decision of 2 leaders back then. Divide was not necessary since most people didn want to/care. But now Im glad its done. After last election its clear that Slovaks are more pro-russia, and czechs more pro-western.
Thanks for this video. It's very informative. 😀👍
as a moravian i love slovakia my sme bratři B)
i had the Czech ambassador speak to a class i was in in university, he said he was told to NOT talk about Quebec separating from Canada, and proceeded to talk about how Quebec separating was NOT how the Czechs and Slovaks separated. lol
Huh? Quebec is a part of Canada I'm confused
@@tunahan4418 means the two attempts to seperate both which were referendum votes barely if any violence except flq days 50 years ago
@@tunahan4418 Quebec has had a couple of referendums on separating, including a 1995 vote that was 49.5% in favor of leaving Canada and 50.5% in favor of staying. IT REMAINS A CONTENTIOUS ISSUE
@@tunahan4418 openly separatist parties continue to exist in Quebec at the Federal and Provincial level
@@beepboop204 as someone in BC I wish Quebec would leave but they stay, sucking money from western Canada. Real welfare pros. 🤣🤣🤣🤣