the story was enjoyable but the voice chosen for the narrator wasn't the best option. one drawback to using these generated voices besides the fact they don't possess the ability to pronounce heteronyms correctly for meaning the words have in the sentence (i.e. live-live), a real person reading the story is able use the proper inflection needed to create a sense of suspense, awe, surprise, defeat, pride, contemplation, etc. needed for the story to be impactful and for the listener to feel satisfied when hearing the story. While still lacking these components, other narration voices don't cause these missing elements to be as glaringly obvious as others do. This one falls in the middle. There are other voices that make it more obvious than this one. But also, there are other voices that call attention to it less than the voice used to read this story.
guy is irradiated so the other guy sits there getting second hand radiation he be dead. Writer be it human or AI seem to not know lethal radiation = death see reference: Chernobyl.
apparently it's sci-fi so they're advanced enough that as long as they can survive long enough to get to medical treatment, they'll be fine since all they have to do is repair the damaged DNA or something would've been nice if they had mentioned that in the story, though; would've been easy: "medics treating him and repairing his DNA" or some line like that
@jacobsmithps how is it you classified this as 'entertainment'? It isn't, at most it might be 'an attempt at storytelling'. It is a disaster of the highest order as is.
The AI narrator is nowhere near good and neither are the generated subtitles. There are way too many mistakes in both. The story was good but the narration and subtitles caused a definite lack of enjoyment. The lack of quality shows a lack of interest in creating a quality product and a lack of quality control. It feels like taking an easy way to make money with minimal effort. This was enough to make me put this channel on the blocked list for my feed. Maybe I will check again in a few months if things have changed.
It's the same slop all around that's becoming a trend since tik tok, a lazy bum steals a reddit story, throws it into text to speech, puts in some AI generated pictures, then throws the video on to an AI subs title generator. Boom, quick money
Its about overcoming fear, its about aspiring to somwthing greater, and most importantly...ITS ABOUT THE METS! LETS GO, BABYYYYY!!!
This one is at it again, instead of, "buy us time, "they wrote, "bias time".
"Fear is the mind killer" Dune
the story was enjoyable but the voice chosen for the narrator wasn't the best option.
one drawback to using these generated voices besides the fact they don't possess the ability to pronounce heteronyms correctly for meaning the words have in the sentence (i.e. live-live), a real person reading the story is able use the proper inflection needed to create a sense of suspense, awe, surprise, defeat, pride, contemplation, etc. needed for the story to be impactful and for the listener to feel satisfied when hearing the story.
While still lacking these components, other narration voices don't cause these missing elements to be as glaringly obvious as others do.
This one falls in the middle. There are other voices that make it more obvious than this one. But also, there are other voices that call attention to it less than the voice used to read this story.
There is another channsl, Starbound, they use voice actors, sounds so good.
guy is irradiated so the other guy sits there getting second hand radiation he be dead. Writer be it human or AI seem to not know lethal radiation = death see reference: Chernobyl.
apparently it's sci-fi so they're advanced enough that as long as they can survive long enough to get to medical treatment, they'll be fine since all they have to do is repair the damaged DNA or something
would've been nice if they had mentioned that in the story, though; would've been easy: "medics treating him and repairing his DNA" or some line like that
Please if you are going to dictate these, read these afterwards for incorrect homonyms. It pulls the audience out of the story.
And we all should be grateful for the free entertainment even with very minor errors.
@jacobsmithps how is it you classified this as 'entertainment'? It isn't, at most it might be 'an attempt at storytelling'. It is a disaster of the highest order as is.
I find these are easier if you just listen. But yeah, AI cannot match a human reading a script.
The AI narrator is nowhere near good and neither are the generated subtitles. There are way too many mistakes in both. The story was good but the narration and subtitles caused a definite lack of enjoyment. The lack of quality shows a lack of interest in creating a quality product and a lack of quality control. It feels like taking an easy way to make money with minimal effort. This was enough to make me put this channel on the blocked list for my feed. Maybe I will check again in a few months if things have changed.
You forget that AI is short for Actually an Idiot
It's the same slop all around that's becoming a trend since tik tok, a lazy bum steals a reddit story, throws it into text to speech, puts in some AI generated pictures, then throws the video on to an AI subs title generator. Boom, quick money