Thank you for repeating this test. In my mind, an adjusted increase to 2,500 - 2,600 PSI (voids warranty) seems to be a reasonable balance of performance gain without going crazy overboard so long as you are a responsible operator who has plenty of rear ballast plus keeps the load very low and speed very slow when moving with a load and you accept the warranty void or you are beyond warranty. Note: I’m not telling anybody else what to do here. Simply sharing my personal thoughts as a person who’s used my front end loader for hundreds of hours.
Nice info. I would have liked to seen how much high higher the previous weight with the new pressure would be before adding more weight. I have a need to lift to a 3' height.
The interesting question is why does the higher pressure void the warranty? Does it create a less safe condition that is more of a liability issue? Ie a less stable tractor that could tip in an awkward way like too high of a load on uneven ground? Could it overload and then damage the front axel? HydrosPlus seems to suggest that the hoses and components all have a high safety margin as far as pressure. I’ve watched a number of Hydros Plus videos here that are selling bigger hydraulic pumps for greater flow (which doesn’t increase lift capacity or “power” but allows smoother multi-function operations. They also are happy to sell bigger diameter cylinders for the loader and backhoe to thus provide greater power/lift capacity but that solution has a hefty price tag. So, just cranking up the pressure would be a lot cheaper! Lifting more weight as you thoughtfully noted has its own higher risks for balancing front to rear loads. But, I’ll typically do loading with a 450 lb attachment on the rear 3-point hitch. If anything, then my front wheels seem light in that steering is less effective except under load on the loader. So load balancing is important. Also my 2016 1025R has very low hours on it but is years out of warranty anyways… but I don’t want to break anything or create unsafe conditions.
Anything over spec will void the warranty. That’s just how it works. They aren’t going to allow you to up the pressure to a certain extent, but past that void the warranty. Lol. It’s just easier for them to say anything over spec voids the warranty.
@@BigDaddyAddyMS I get that it voids the warranty. I’m already out of warranty. The question remains on why JD considers it as “bad”. If we know that answer then we can better manage the issue and better consider the risks. The general research I’ve collected suggests that 10% over spec is not a very big deal as far as risks.
@@zanepaxton7452 The hydraulic system can handle 3000 psi easy. It's the front axle's 1300 lb capacity and tip over risks that keeps deere's recommended pressure so low.
Thank you for repeating this test.
In my mind, an adjusted increase to 2,500 - 2,600 PSI (voids warranty) seems to be a reasonable balance of performance gain without going crazy overboard so long as you are a responsible operator who has plenty of rear ballast plus keeps the load very low and speed very slow when moving with a load and you accept the warranty void or you are beyond warranty.
Note: I’m not telling anybody else what to do here. Simply sharing my personal thoughts as a person who’s used my front end loader for hundreds of hours.
Nice info. I would have liked to seen how much high higher the previous weight with the new pressure would be before adding more weight. I have a need to lift to a 3' height.
Done. Lol
ua-cam.com/video/ns0IwVxWkbI/v-deo.html
The interesting question is why does the higher pressure void the warranty? Does it create a less safe condition that is more of a liability issue? Ie a less stable tractor that could tip in an awkward way like too high of a load on uneven ground? Could it overload and then damage the front axel? HydrosPlus seems to suggest that the hoses and components all have a high safety margin as far as pressure.
I’ve watched a number of Hydros Plus videos here that are selling bigger hydraulic pumps for greater flow (which doesn’t increase lift capacity or “power” but allows smoother multi-function operations. They also are happy to sell bigger diameter cylinders for the loader and backhoe to thus provide greater power/lift capacity but that solution has a hefty price tag.
So, just cranking up the pressure would be a lot cheaper! Lifting more weight as you thoughtfully noted has its own higher risks for balancing front to rear loads. But, I’ll typically do loading with a 450 lb attachment on the rear 3-point hitch. If anything, then my front wheels seem light in that steering is less effective except under load on the loader. So load balancing is important.
Also my 2016 1025R has very low hours on it but is years out of warranty anyways… but I don’t want to break anything or create unsafe conditions.
Anything over spec will void the warranty. That’s just how it works. They aren’t going to allow you to up the pressure to a certain extent, but past that void the warranty. Lol. It’s just easier for them to say anything over spec voids the warranty.
@@BigDaddyAddyMS I get that it voids the warranty. I’m already out of warranty. The question remains on why JD considers it as “bad”. If we know that answer then we can better manage the issue and better consider the risks.
The general research I’ve collected suggests that 10% over spec is not a very big deal as far as risks.
@@zanepaxton7452 The hydraulic system can handle 3000 psi easy. It's the front axle's 1300 lb capacity and tip over risks that keeps deere's recommended pressure so low.
What psi did you have the front tires set for this test?
I don’t know. Whatever the factory spec is?