What Rapunzel should have asked Vanellope was: “Was your rightful identity hidden from you by a villain for their own selfish, self-centered reasons?” But then I guess they would have had to acknowledge Turbo’s existence, therefore making apparent how bad the writing choice for Vanellope's character was.
In fact, if you change villain to “someone you thought you could trust”, aurora could have been included in that statement as well, that’s way way better than the “bIG StrOnG mAn” quote.
I think Felix must have asked Q Beert and his friends to play the role as the antagontists in Fix-It Felix as the ones wrecking the building for Felix to fix in Ralph’s place while he and Vanellope were in the internet trying to buy the Sugar Rush steering wheel from ebay during open arcade hours at Lipwak’s Arcade to fix and save Sugar Rush from being unplugged and must have also did so while Ralph was making Vanellope a new racing track also during open arcade hours.
that was the first thing that should've alerted me to how poorly they were gonna make this movie. Heck- i felt the wave of dread as soon as they mentioned the internet
Came down here to make the exact same comment lmao. It's difficult for me to remember that it's "breaks" and not "wrecks" even now. Fortunately, I never have to think about this movie (unless I'm watching a UA-cam video destroying it).
When I was in elementary school, I had a dream about a Wreck-It-Ralph sequel. All I can remember from it is Vanellope and Taffyta building a snow man out of ice cream but it was a ton better than this actual sequel we got many years later.
The fact that a dream, which is randomly made by brainy science stuff, is better than a human-made movie that costed millions, really says a lot about those writers.
Another terrible sin that is arguably just as bad as the one you mentioned is the fact that they LIED about including Mario. Yes they did and NO ONE can convince me otherwise.
It honestly made me mad. They’re such a wholesome couple-actually that’s why they didn’t because it would’ve been nice to see them and therefor shouldn’t be shown.
I always hated how Vanellope gets supported and praised for wanting to do the exact same thing Turbo did in the first movie, but it gets totally handwaved away by her code being fixed offscreen. It's such a blatant case of protagonist-centred morality.
also I wonder If the characters can "fix the code" what was stopping them from having Vanellope return home, and having Slaughter Race have some re occurring crossover event on the days the arcade is closed? That way she could visit the game and have her new thrill and not completely destroy the logic established in the first movie. It would still not be an "amazing" ending but better than what we got. It would be like "You don't need to leave your life behind to explore new things"
Ralph Before: *Runs into a giant nest of bugs that could literally kill him for a medal.* Raplh Now: *Is too scared to confront a group of 'hooligans' that he could literally kill by swinging his massive arms*
I will never forgive Vanellope for basically going Turbo and abandoning all her friends and subjects just to play/live in a internet game she spent a few days in. What if they close down Sugar Rush because she's gone? What if they shut down Slaughter Race because the players think Vanellope is a glitch? Or the game is discontinued because the players don't like the new kid character? I can't believe that the players of both games would be happy about this!
Considering the fact that Vaneollpe went Turbo posthumously King Candy/Turbo got the last laugh as she ended up being no better then him and yet instead of her going Turbo being portrayed as a bad thing it’s portrayed as a GOOD thing. The sheer hypocrisy of it is INFURIATING and DISGUSTING!!!
@@Disneyfan82 Not to mention disturbingly King Candy/Turbo was RIGHT about Vaneollpe since she ended up being a glitch in a way (becoming part of a game she was never supposed to be apart of in the first place) if those idiot directors Bitch Moore and Dildo Johnston didn’t start to work on that furry pandering SJW mess known as Zootopia before they made the sequel this film likely wouldn’t have been as bad as it ended up being as it doesn’t help that many of the same people who worked on Ralph Breaks The Internet also worked on Zootopia like the aforementioned Bitch Moore and Dildo Johnston and it also doesn’t help that Nick Wilde made a brief yet very notable cameo in Ralph Breaks The Internet.
The first Wreck it Ralph was very good and a tribute to old arcade games without going through problems of references over story. Instead Ralph Breaks The Internet follows modern outdated comedy and assassinates Ralph and Vanellope.
Yeah, they literally ignored this, but only way to fix this movie if the third movie deals with Venelope going Turbo and somehow Turbo may have altered her code or added his code in it so he can survive somehow if in case and Venelope is slowly turning into him as her code is almost being overwritten and only way to save her is to bring her back home and reset her before they lose her forever, also introduce a different Turbo that isn't the same as the one from the other one but is actually good and all, so yeah
It essentially means that in the end King Candy/Turbo posthumously got the last laugh since Vanellope ended up being no better then him but instead of it being portrayed as a bad thing for Vanellope to do it is instead portrayed as a GOOD thing for Vanellope to do which is just INFURIATING!!!
@@Mario87456 this is so indescribably hilarious to me the entire movies message was about Vanellope finding her place and now in the sequel she leaves that place she worked so hard to find because... she met some random girl... for a few hours... very realistic! i find it so funny that either the writers were so incompetent they didn't see this GLARING flaw or they just didn't give a fuck or possibly the worst one they thought it was good writing Edit: apparently according to some other guys comment the movies plot was supposed to be completely different as seen in the artbook but the morons running disney didn't like an actually good sequel so they made this garbage instead
Ok let's face it. Megamind 2 is even worse. Ralph Breaks the Internet at least has its funny jokes and have stunning animation. Megamind 2 on the other hand has half-assed animations that came straight out of cocomelon, full of lame jokes, and somehow looks even worse than the first movie.
@@p3mcthedoor32to be honest... you're right. This film is bad and all, but at least it had higher production values. Both are atrocities in their own right though.
I've heard someone say that this movie isn't just bad but also dangerous. 1. It teaches kids that it's super easy to become an internet sensation 2. It teaches kids that it's easy to win a crap ton of money through UA-cam videos in just a few hours 3. It teaches kids that if you're bored with your life than it's perfectly okay to abandon everything else behind for something new. 4. It teaches kids that you can easily hack the internet 5. It teaches kids that it's okay to talk to strangers on the internet
The movie's portrayal of the internet in general is just highly illogical. How does making money on BuzzTube even work? It comes from people giving you hearts? How does that even work? It makes no sense. Neither does Ralph making all of these edited videos in less than a third of a day. The movie also does not go into the negative impacts/challenges of grinding content like Ralph does (burnout, copyright challenges, demonetisation, etc). But for something more on topic, another potentially dangerous thing the movie presents to kids is the dark web. By having the dark web in the movie (and in a not subtle way), it teaches people the existence of the dark web and some kids may actually end up on the dark web and possibly do something stupid because they saw it in this movie. The movie doesn't portray the dark web in a positive light to be fair but it still shows this real world thing to children and some of them may end up on the dark web because the movie told them it's bad.
Honestly number 5 isn't that bad. You just have to be careful. Don't tell them personal details and tell your parents if they ask for anything too close for you. But other than that, talking to people isn't that bad, it actually made me feel like I could talk to people more IRL
Honestly, a major part of the internet is the ability to talk to strangers. It seems rather underwhelming if kids are just not able to partake in a pretty significant part of the internet. They just obviously need to be careful with strangers, not revealing personal information or anything like that.
Ralph acting like an obsessive best friend caught me off guard. His relationship with Vanellope in the first movie was more like found family. They were both outcasts, and because of that developed a bond similar to a father and daughter or older brother and younger sister. Ralph had fun hanging out with Vanellope, but was never a man child about it, a prime example being the time he built an entire race track for her. They still had fun, but Ralph building the track for Vanellope was like a father making something special for their kid. He was also usually the voice of reason and always prioritized safety. All that wholesomeness was taken away in the second movie and their relationship just seemed strange and toxic.
I will smoothly diverge from the popular opinion in this thread and claim that the realtionship between Ralph and Venellope is toxic and strange by design. The second movie is about change. Their character arc reacts to the changes that relationship goes through. For Venellope most things are amazing, she is finally at the top but still something feels out of place. This is a normal response to reaching ones goal and then being faced with the loss of direction. This is also expanded on later in the movie when she is faced with the very normal motive in a children's, how to accept change and see the opportunity in ones future. This motive also appears in Moana, The lion king, Rapunzel and more. It's really just a common theme in children's movies, because its a common theme that children faces sooner or later. Ralph on the other hand have never before had a real friend like Venellope but as she is a child, he have sometime a hard time deciding when to be the grown up figure. If you understand adult/child relationship this is a common theme, that the adult sometimes have a hard time deciding if they should be the adult/protector of the child or if they should be their buddy. You can't simply always be both, sometimes you gotta choose. But i digress, what Ralp is dealing with for the first time in his life is trying to maintain a relationship while also going through the mundane that is a regular work day. On top of that Venellope livs across town so to speak. All this distance between them, both physically and metaphorically, turns Ralph into a toxic mental state where he is convinced that if he doesn't obsessively engage with Venellope, no matter the consequences, Ralph might loose her. This isn't rational, of course, because its based on fear. Ralph haven't fought through how his actions might affect their relationship , its the fear of drifting apart that drives him into a flight-or -fight response. In line with this toxic version of his character arc he chooses fight and who would blame him. He did fight a lot for Venellope in the last movie and it work, so when instilled with fear, why wouldn't one do something that worked last time. Again I understand I divert from the popular opinion here..and I'm not suppose to tell you this...but I'm somewhat of a divergent.
The thing that also upsets me about the whole “Big strong man saving you” line is the fact that MAJORITY OF THEM GOT SAVED BY THEMSELVES! Anna saved Elsa, Moana saved her home ( with the help of Maui, it wasn’t Maui that was the one who saved her or her home ultimately ), MULAN IS ONE WHO DIDN’T HAVE A BIG STRONG MAN SHOW UP TO SAVE HER! Tiana saved herself, Merida wasn’t even saved by a man she was saved by her MOM! Disney or whoever wrote this movie probably never watched said movies. And then also yeah Knuckles’ quote.
And say whatever for Rapunzel, but she saved herself. She was the one to save herself from living a life without Eugene. She was the one who revived him and it was her who stood up against Gothel. Yeah sure Eugene saved her but ultimately Rapunzel was the one who saved herself in the end. She still knew how to fight without Eugene ( example: the whole scene with the lucky duckling inn and them running from the guards ). Jasmine had no choice, she was trapped in that hourglass drowning. Aurora was sleep, Snow White ate the apple but that wasn’t cause of a big man, THE DWARVES defeated the witch. And Cinderella you saved yourself from your step mother the prince was NOWHERE near you in that scene. I just don’t understand how they could miss these important things on why most of these reasons are not why they’re princesses. They’re not why we look up to them. Again KNUCKLES QUOTE
Yeah, no one actually thinks the princesses did nothing important and were helpless compared to the men. The only ones even close to that were Philip and the dwarfs from Snow White, but even Phillip had essential help from the three fairies (all women) and Snow White was made in the freaking 30s (and still, compared to other 30s movies, has really not aged that badly at all). So why make up this nonsense other than to discredit the princes for some illogical reason?
@@Rockotarthepurplehatguy The Dwarfs also were charmed by Snow White's helpful persoanlity and they helped her because an evil Queen was hunting her down.
@@Rockotarthepurplehatguy Really, Sleeping Beauty was pretty much the only one who could've had most of the Princess Traits applied to her story, and she hardly gets any screen time because she's not very popular these days. If she's not popular, why is she apparently the blueprint??
What's also inaccurate is the fact when all of the princesses respond to vanellope that they didn't have a mom either, which is completely not true for some of the princesses since their mothers are STILL alive like aurora, mulan, moana, rapunzel, merida, and tiana. That is a absolute slap in the face to the princesses mothers and makes it more obvious that the writers didn't care to watch the princess movies or do any research and just called it a day by thinking all of the princesses are motherless.
The Nightmare Before Christmas is also Ralph Breaks The Internet done right with being tired of the same routine. While it was understandable of Jack to be tired of the same routine of Halloween every year and yes he did have good intentions for Christmas. He despite all his studies, still did more harm than good. In the end he compromised by while despite still doing the same routine, he tries to do something different next Halloween.
With the idea of doing something different in your own world, instead of Penelope leaving at the end, a better solution would be for Ralph and Felix to come in every so often to build a new track for Sugar Rush. Ralph has built a track before and Felix fixed the finish line, so it's not out of character. It also wouldn't cause problems to the game because I'm sure players would love for a new and fun track update every month or so.
@@ashleymueller8844 That’s a good idea. Also Jack unlike Vanellope was not willing to ditch his friends and his kingdom for something new and even wanted to get them involved in his new idea of Christmas.
Honestly I'm mad about the "big strong man" part. Rapunzel and Eugene sacrificed each other's lives for one another. He almost died/did die for her. She sacrificed her freedom and happiness and life for Eugene. I don't get why or never know why Disney HAS to ruin their best work
I mean, if we talk about TLM, BATB, Snow White... y'know, I defend them but I WOULD undertand if Disney feel somewhat ashamed of them (still, again, gonna defend those movies till' the end) But TANGLED? That's already a "5 people didn't like it and that's why we pretend to be MODERN with it to make those 5 people or less change their minds'' case.
You forgot a criticism. In-Universe, Ralph & Vanellope are copyrighted characters. Ralph appearing in implied HD videos should get his company mad. Vanellope being in an internet MMO should get her company mad. And yet the movie *never* mentions their companies!
Tbf the first movie also raised similar questions when ralph invited the q-bert characters into a bonus stage, as crossovers dont just happen like that. but i find that way easier to gloss over and forgive as its just a cute side add on to the ending and not part of the literal main plot. + its only a feature in this one fix it felix jr machine in this specific arcade, so you can just assume the company didnt find out because mr. litwack didnt bother to report the bonus stage thats raking in profits, unlike the supposed millions of people that witnessed ralph and vanellope's antics here
@@MrCow-tg9jd Even long before the horrid sequel ever came to be I always did find it questionable that the Q*bert characters ended up in Fix It Felix Jr. at the end of the movie even with the fact that their game had been unplugged long ago it came across as just plain hypocritical to me even back when I watched the movie the first time in theaters.
The movie has a lot of plot holes but at least this one is explained, when the kids find a steering wheel on ebay litwalk does say that the company closed
Similarly, adding onto that, if I’d been given the wheel, I’d have Vanellope character arc be that of a pre-teen temper tantrum throughout the movie, realizing in the end that we sometimes have to sacrifice our personal desires for the greater good, and be content with what we have, ultimately choosing to return to Sugar Rush and visiting Shank every now and then.
Yeah, I kinda feel like Ralph was like that in the first movie, especially the sad part here he destroyed the car to protect her like she’s his daughter. In the first movie their relationship was adorable and charming. In this movie it’s kinda creepy and really weird until the end and even then, vanelope goes turbo.
It frustrates me how selfish Vanellope is in this movie that, despite ruling Sugar Rush for SIX YEARS and being responsible for everyone and the racers, she completely abandons them without giving them any last good-bye or explanation and it doesn't seem to faze her one bit.
Not to mention she basically turned Turbo because of selfish reasons. Turbo was demonized for his actions in the first movie, but if you think about it, he had a good reason to do what he did, even if it evolved into wrong reasons later. Vanellope didn't. Her arcade was successful, and to make things worse, it was because of HER specifically.
@WakerOfTheSky204 to Turbo's credit, he was jealous. Not a good reason, but Vanellope goes Turbo because she's bored...before trying anything else to try and find her spark again
@@unapersona.831 Ironically King Candy/Turbo himself was right about Vaneollpe in a way especially since she (along with Ralph) caused Sugar Rush to get unplugged and now will soon presumably cause it to be unplugged FOREVER due to her going Turbo though not for the reasons King Candy/Turbo claimed. Meaning posthumously he got the last laugh.
@GabePlaysYT granted the people in her video game treated her terribly in the first movie. Bullying her and destroying her possessions and not treating her with common human decency. They didn’t make it a very welcoming place that Vanellope would want to stay in. Also it makes sense after doing the same mundane thing day after day she would want to explore a bit.
The funny thing is, even though you tore apart this movie limb from limb, there's 1 bigger problem that further demolishes this film's existence that I didn't see mentioned. In Wreck-it Ralph, Sugar Rush was a 2-player game. In this movie, it's single player. The movie's plot literally doesn't work AT ALL unless you overwrite the past movie, as the game could very easily have 1 of its terminals closed for maintenance until it gets fixed. This retcon is the one I always point to if I come across defense of this movie, because it's the biggest part of this movie that's objectively not defendable. I loathe this movie, and its existence is an insult to my favorite Disney movie of all time.
That actually enrages me in a way i didn't think was possible. How can anybody make a sequel to something and blatantly disregard so much established details like that. Do these people even pay attention to the intentional details and notes of the worldbuilding of the previous movie at all? Or do they watch quick clips from the trailer and decide "Yep! That's good enough knowledge to make a 2nd movie totally!"
@@sundalosketch4769 I wouldn't be surprised. We went from relatable, charming, and unique, to insulting, destructive, and completely ignorant of every good thing the original had. I wanted more from this universe, but I don't want any more sequels if we have to keep this abomination as canon. I can only hope for side stories now 🤞
Ralph didn’t INTEND to unleash the virus, but let’s remember…. Ralph didn’t INTEND to unleash the Cybugs in the first film. And yet, he was ready to give up everything, sacrifice himself, to stop the Cybugs and attempt to save his friend, and, most importantly, FIX. HIS. MISTAKES.
Thanks you for talking about how bad Vanellope's song is. When Schaffrillas started praising it to be the only good part of the film, I was confused. "What? _This_ is the best part of the film? This horrendous song sung about going Turbo? That can't be right." And thankfully, it wasn't. Hated that song so damn much.
I love how you imply that Cinderella breaking her glass slipper is out of character because she'd have a lot of sentimental value for the slipper, and not because- yknow- she's a lifelong abuse survivor pointing BROKEN GLASS at a CHILD.
but no, she has to be badass so people will like her, and Disney must completely change her personality from the "oh I'm a helpless damsel in distress" trope (THAT ISN'T ACTUALLY IN THE MOVIE BUT PEOPLE ACT LIKE IT WAS) to that stock feminist woman character that I can't escape no matter how fast I run
@@Termina2018 They could have used the princesses to make a nice scene which would give everyone nostalgia but no they did not because Misandry is the only thing that makes you look cool nowadays.
@@sonicfan9144There definitely had to have been some kind of studio interference or something considering that this movie was made by the exact same crew that made the first film
The funny fact that the people who keep saying that cyberbullying is so terrible and it has to be stopped Are the same people who probably haven't made friends in primary school
Well Disney "Imagineering" is just simple appropriation and plagiarism. So it makes sense that their well of American "pop-culture based" ideas, compromised by monopoly, would eventually dry up!
And then Mamoru Hosoda made the best animated film of 2021 with Belle, by making a movie about the Internet. Succeeding where The Emoji Movie and Ralph Breaks the Internet failed at.
Honestly the most disappointing part of the movie for me is that internet based games DO exist. They could have easily done a love letter to internet games like with arcade games instead of sites that have little to no relevance to games. This would obviously have to happen at night, like game characters meeting up in the original movie. Imagine Ralph going to a tower defense game, or Calhoun finding a MMO. It would be so much better.
Hell, they could travel from pc based online games like Fall Guys and Genshin Impact to mobile games in a movie like that. And I can also imagine there being an online games graveyard where old retired online games go, and Disney could use that to reference Club Penguin and ToonTown Online, and other online games Disney had a hand in. That would honestly be pretty neat and a nice bit of fanservice for an older audience.
@@Kmuecman64 Nah, I'm sorry this is not a "lol" type of moment. Because if, and for good reason too, the developers think that a tiny sugarplum princess doesn't belong in a game about gang members racing each other in a post-apocalyptic world, and decide to DELETE her... She'd freakin die 🙂
That’s probably my least favorite part of this movie, how nerfed Ralph is. In the first one people were scared of him. Absolutely terrified, even king candy was afraid of Ralph. The main reason was because he was the bad guy, but they were also afraid of him for his strength and rage we’ve seen a few times. He’s basically the hulk and most people were still afraid of him even after learning he’s good. That was also the one reason people weren’t scared of him ,if they weren’t, because he was a good guy. The new characters in the internet I doubt have ever seen Ralph nor knew that he was now a good guy. You’d think they’d be afraid if a hulk came into your website or game. And why wasn’t his strength ever used in the movie?!??
Speaking of bad guys.. There's a cameo of a certain UA-camr who's become rather infamous this year. (It was when the Ralph virus clones were kicking people off the internet.) I don't wanna name her because I think we're all aware of this person & her controversies, but remembering that cameo just makes me cringe so gd much I had to acknowledge it.
@@FurKid_the_Gg_roo_99 Lemme guess, Colleen Ballinger? Honestly the only good scnee in that movie is her losing internet because Ralph's tantrum caused him to throw a billboard at her
The worst part about Vanellope going Turbo is that by doing so she'd be getting the game shut down, the same game that she's trying to save by getting the new wheel for it, defeating the entire purpose of them going to the internet to begin with.
I love how in the first movie, Ralph literally almost got his game unplugged when he left it while the arcade was open, yet in this movie, he does the exact same thing again. Apparently he learned nothing from the first movie. He’s gonna get his game put out of order again.
It's even worse this time. In the first movie, Ralph left on his own, with Felix and the Nicelanders not knowing he was gone until it was too late. In this movie, he tells Felix that he's going to leave his game for a while, and rather than try to stop him, Felix just tells Ralph that he'll "cover for him" (which he should know he has no possible way of doing). The logical thing to do would've been to have characters whose absence wouldn't be a big deal - like a background Nicelander, one of the unimportant soldiers in Hero's Duty, or a Sugar Rush racer that doesn't get picked often - to go get the wheel. But I guess then we wouldn't really have a movie
@@SamTheMarioMan I'm also talking about when Ralph went to Sugar Rush to build Vanellope a new track. He does this while the arcade is open, and this in the FIRST 10 MINUTES of the movie. And even worse, this is what causes the entire story to happen. So the entire movie happens because Ralph apparently forgot what happened in the first movie when he left his game.
@@sonicfan9144 True but Vanellope is also at fault here because she stupidly wrestled control from the player just to try out this poorly made “new track” which led to the wheel breaking. Also Sugar Rush was made a single player game for no reason other then to make this stupid plot work.
@@Mario87456 Exactly. I feel like it’s just like what GamingMagic13 pointed out with Toy Story 4. In the opening flashback scene, RC is stuck in the driveway on the side of Andy’s house, but that driveway wasn’t there in the previous movies. Same situation here, they apparently forgot that Sugar Rush was a 2-player game. So now because of that one error, this movie is destroyed like the cake that Ralph smashed.
I have a peculiar way of telling when a movie is going to be awful. It's when they keep promoting a single scene from the movie repeatedly. For instance, in one movie, they showcased all the Disney Princesses. Do they really think people will watch a movie just because all the Disney princesses are in it? It worked on my sister, but after watching it, she said it was terrible.
How I would fix this movie personally is make Shank the main antagonist of the movie. It would make sense to make her the villain because of how she brainwashes Vanellope to stay in Slaughter Race and abandon Sugar Rush. Vanellope tries to leave, but Shank wouldn't let her go. Ralph finds out Shank is evil and saves Vanellope from Slaughter Race. Instead of Vanellope scolding Ralph, Ralph is the one scolding Vanellope for trying to abandon Sugar Rush. It ends with Ralph and Vanellope successfully getting the steering wheel to the arcade and everything goes back to normal.
Yeah. When I first saw this movie I was thinking Shank was going to be the main antagonist. But then she and her gang switch to very kind and cuddly rather abruptly at the end of the race, which really threw me off. Your change would've been consistent with the cannon of the earlier movie--especially not leaving your game and "going Turbo." I would add that the process of saving Venellope from Shank could've included Felix, Calhoun and even some of the Nicelanders and Sugar Rush racers. Instead, well, we get this bizarre mess of a movie, with that very weird climactic fight in the end.
You wanna know something else that’s REALLY mind boggling? The entire reason for Ralph’s characterization in this movie is because one of the directors misunderstood ONE single line of dialogue from the first movie. The director talks about the scene where Ralph says “If that little kid likes me, how bad can I be?” and he says that it’s a sweet sentiment, but you start to realize that it means Ralph has more growing to do. He’s defining himself based on whether or not Vanellope likes him. It doesn’t mean he’s actually learned to like himself. And my response to that is…. This quote from the first movie would beg to differ. “There’s no one I’d rather be, than me.” If that isn’t self acceptance, I don’t know what is. Also, he isn’t basing his happiness solely on Vanellope liking him, he’s saying that he’s glad that at least SOMEONE appreciates him for who he is. By the way, here is proof of what he said. ua-cam.com/video/eOwQC6DpgO8/v-deo.html
Exactly. He comes to accept himself and "take life one game at a time" and is appreciated that someone cares about him when he's been treated as a villain his whole life
I get that two people can look at the same scene and get two different interpretations out of it, but it was SO obvious what the scene was communicating, how do they miss the point of it entirely? And how do they get to work on a sequel to that movie? How has Disney not become bankrupt yet?
@@yeeyeeyeeyeI'm curious too, Disney making lots of bad movies throughout the years, is still not bankrupt yet. Maybe because of Disneyland or something? People keep on coming there
Another nitpicky fact that I still find worth mentioning: Literally why did they not call it Ralph WRECKS The Internet? That was THE PERFECT title. It was right in front of their faces, but no, they went with the inferior title.
Hell, they even joked about this at the end of one of the trailers. Ralph and Vanellope say that 'Wrecks the internet' sounds better, and Yes agrees, proving this was a DELIBERATE CHOICE THEY MADE.
I think they went with Breaks the Internet because this movies script was first written back in 2014. Around that time, I believe the term “breaking the Internet” was somewhat big. However, it immediately outdates itself because the Internet is always changing with that’s popular or trending. Meanwhile, Ralph Wrecks the Internet works in the context of the title character and honestly rolls off the tongue better
Because "breaking the internet" was a phrase already. The title is a double entendre, literal, as in the virus, and figurative, as in being really popular.
Ralph breaks the internet is what happens when someone gets too money hungry and “hip”. I mean naming a character “Yass” cause that’s what all the “cool teens are saying these days” has got to be one of the most cringey and saddest reasons to write something. Also, I’m praying that one of the other movies is Mulan 2. It’s a war crime to consider that movie a sequel to the original Mulan.
another scene that makes NO SENSE is, again, the scene where the wheel brakes. not only is Ralph STILL in Vanellope’s game, but he’s STANDING IN FRONT OF THE SCREEN WHERE EVERYONE CAN SEE HIM WHEN MR LITWAK IS STANDING RIGHT THERE!!! the stupidity is just mind boggling 😭💀
@@pogggaming4470 yeah that’s true, but ig Q*Bert’s game had already been unplugged so he didn’t think much about any consequences since he probably just wanted to go somewhere other than the Plug. also, he was still being careful and staying completely off screen, and if i remember correctly came to warn Felix about Ralph the first time
ralphs obsesiveness for vanellope is even more creepy when you consider the fact that ralph is in his 30's and vanellope is not even double didgets in age :/
I hate the "Do people always assume your problems got solved because a big strong man showed up?" The men who saved the girls in those movies didn't do it to proof they were strong and everything would be okay with them. They did it because they loved them. They were willing to risk their lives to make sure they were okay just as the princesses were too. I'm also noticing a trend in Disney movies Vanellope left Sugar Rush. Woody left the Bonnie and the gang. Elsa left Arendelle. Disney seems to be saying abandoning your family is okay. I know sometimes people have to spilt apart; that's a part of life. But these characters do it for selfish desires. Remember how hard Vanellope tried to be accepted into the lineup? Remember how Woody used to say there's nothing more important than being played by a kid? Remember how Elsa had to wait 13 years to be Annas sister again? I guess current year Disney doesn't care.
but they are not talking about the men that saved them, they're talking people around. fairytales usually end up with a marriage as if it's the ending point, but it's. problems don't vanish simply because you found someone special. but they are not talking about the men that saved them, they're talking about what do other people think of them. fairytales usually end up with a marriage as if it's the ending point, but it's. problems don't vanish simply because you found someone special.
@София Хантер some of the princesses saying that made no sense. Either because their problems actually WERE solved by a man, or because it's very common knowledge the problems WERENT and only a small minority would think they were. Like Tiana, Moana, Mulan, Elsa and Anna, Meredith, characters who LITERALLY save themselves in the end
Id like to mention that if your family/friends love you and you can stay for a bit longer than needed, you should. I’m literally able to go to college just bc my parents care abt me and I dont have any reason to hate them. I couldn’t imagine just moving 5 states away bc of some whim convincing me it’s a good idea. To suggest that you should leave a perfectly ok family or situation bc “new adventures await” is so toxic and kinda gives a bad message to kids. Stability & a home to go to is one of the best things you can have in this life if you have it already. That’s not to say to stay if your current situation is toxic just that… if you’re doing ok don’t just fcking leave on a whim. And god. Imagine adults doing that to their children.
I hope the writers recreate the pointless story arc towards Ralph’s overly clinginess towards Vanelope in Ralph Breaks the Internet by having in Zootopia 2 Nick and Judy becoming tempted with leaving the ZPD and their positions as police officers and heroes in Zootopia and become spies and secret agents and heroes alongside Jack Savage and Kyke and honey badger in this spy and detective agency in the city of Extropolis “Super Life Spies” and have Gazelle, Chief Bogo and Clawhauser appear as an overprotective mother and father or uncle towards Nick and Judy and hero antagontists instead of overly clingy best friends.
If the WI-FI router were an arranged marriage kind of arcade video game like Wreck-It-Ralph assumed when he failed to understand the word WI-FI due to his stupidity and unable to understand basic English (Also calling Ebay EBoy and Google Goggles and when you thought Judy Hopps was an idiot man-child and Nick Wilde was an anti-hero and jerk initially, Ralph is an even bigger idiot/man-child and Maui from Moana till the end was a much bigger anti-hero and jerk himself.) or if one were plugged into LipWak’s Arcade after the events of Ralph Breaks the Internet, Wreck-It-Ralph and Princess Vanelope and the Disney Princesses would grab the netizen Nick Wilde and Judy Hopps and netizen Gazelle and Clawhauser from Oh My Disney and use the arranged marriage game to pair them together and get married as couples as Did du fans wished and hoped and have red fox cub, gray rabbit, Thomson’s gazelle foal, cheetah cub and fox and rabbit hybrid kids to raise, that would be an interesting fanfiction idea or have Nick and Judy and Gazelle and Clawhauser become married couples and have kids to raise as mentioned in Zootopia 2 and have the third Wreck-It-Ralph movie be about Nintendo Switch and PlayStation Five and WII-U video games (Like Minecraft, Super Mario 3D World and Bowser’s Fury, Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze,) and the main characters visiting them from LitWak's Arcade or them visiting apps on IPads and iPhones and emojis like in The Emoji Movie but in a better executed way like the mid-credits scene to Ralph Breaks the Internet with Bunny Pancake and Kitty Milkshake app.
The scene where Vanellope desperately begs kaiju Ralph to stop rampaging by dropping her dreams was frighteningly similar to what it looks like dealing with a toxic relationship was... uncomfortable. If that was explored sensitively, sure, but omg it wasn't.
If you had noticed that Sugar Rush is a single seat instead of a two seater and the Nicelanders building has a different design. Also the layout of the arcade is also different. It's like no one saw the first movie.
It would be fun if we took these details as evidence that the movie takes place in an alternate universe. I'd personally like to believe that it's not canon lol.
The first Wreck it Ralph was better because there was so much conflict: 1. Ralph wanted to win a medal but was told bad guys don't win medals so he jumped into another game to do it 2. Fix it Felix tried to bring Ralph back to his game before it went out of order 3. The danger of dying outside your own game makes you dead forever 4. Calhoun trying to destroy all the cybugs before they take over every game in the arcade 5. Vanellope wanting to race in Sugar Rush but she was told she couldn't because she was a glitch 6. King Candy/Turbo Time wanting to become the most popular video game character. This one has only one conflict: buy a new wheel controller for Sugar Rush.
Y'know...Wreck-It Ralph proves something that I love. "A villain without a hero is successful. A hero without a villain is pointless" The game might be named after Felix, but Ralph is the most important piece as he can't fix what isn't broken
@@lordhellstrande2763u r right which is also a negitive for Ralf breaks the internet as there is no villain in the tippical sense as the only villains which are not relly villains just antaginests are the main charicters, mindless viruss 2 that makes thing from insercurities and money.
@@Me.917 Yeah the Ralph clones are just the Cy-bugs again but lame and without an actual antagonist taking control of them like Turbo did. The Cy-bug invasion also was actually set-up early in the movie instead of thrown in randomly near the end.
One big thing worth noting is that Felix and Calhoun's plot wasn't intended to be scrapped, and in some early drafts they appear to have come along to the internet either with the racers or just with Ralph and Vanellope from the beginning - we were supposed to get a found-family sort of adventure with the Core Four (as the four main protagonists are called by fans). The art book for RBTI has storyboards and color keys of this, and various visdev artists have posted about it (not sure if I can link all this and the below since my comments always get deleted when I do that, but it's fairly easy to find). Given that director Rich Moore left Disney a few months after RBTI came out and he expressed a desire for creative freedom, it seems that the movie's actual crew wasn't really to blame for this, since it looks like a case of micromanagement by Disney. Especially given the forced cameos of characters so unfitting to this setting that *virtual avatars* had to be used in-universe - producer Clark Spencer confirmed in an interview that's what the princesses are here, since the actual princesses wouldn't be real people in the WIR world (and there's a movie guidebook for kids that repeats this info). Even in the "foster the racers until Ralph returns" plot, we were supposed to see their entire story onscreen instead of it being cut last minute (so late that there's even merchandise like coloring books and stuff featuring a scene of Felix and Calhoun having dinner with the racers) and turned into overused parenting jokes. It's really damn sad as that half of the main cast had their entire plot scrapped and ended up with less screentime than irrelevant cameos, but it's also sad that these characters were reduced to "herpderp they have to have the Caring For Kids plot since they're a married couple" like it's the 1950s or something. Wreck-It Ralph's epilogue and ending makes Ralph, Vanellope, Felix, and Calhoun a found family yet we see none of that in RBTI. There's just so much wasted potential (this could've been like a Toy Story series with all the creative stuff the crew came up with), and "wasted potential" pretty much sums up all of the issues with how RBTI was handled by Disney.
You mentioning how the princesses were supposed to be author avatars makes sense. Their behaviour is closer to how people interpret the characters online than how they really were in canon. It makes sense that they would make jokes about being kidnapped or relying on men if they were created or controlled by people whose only exposure to the princesses was through internet jokes made during the early-to-mid 2010's. Edit: I meant virtual avatars
Finally, someone else who couldn’t stand the princess scene! There’s a lot I could say about how much potential was missed, but can I just point out how ironic it is that Disney claims to be woke and progressive yet they didn’t give Tiana her original, darker skin tone until after they got a bunch of backlash?
Wait what do you mean they gave her back her skin tone? Did they edit the skin tone and re-rended the entire film for digital release similar to the apartment scene in Incredibles 2 (the fight scene with Elastigirl and the fake Screensaver in that room inside the pizza delivery guys apartment)
@@Mr_Gamer-Random I don’t know how they did it. All I know is that her skin tone in the trailers was lighter and that caused a huge uproar. Then her skin turned out darker in the final product.
I just pretend this movie doesn't exist honestly. That's how bad it is. The first Wreck it Ralph is a timeless new classic for Disney. Ralph Breaks the Internet feels completely dated.
I have tried myself but I just cannot since I have a huge burning hatred for it as well as a burning hatred for the directors Bitch Moore and Dildo Johnston even to this very day even after several years have past which just goes to show just how bad it really is. It was so bad in fact in fact that it utterly and irreconcilably DESTROYED any enjoyment I got out of the original movie. I have VOWED to NEVER watch the film EVER again and I have not ever since my first and only time watching it 2018.
@@maynot I am not even a fan of that show and even I was disgusted and horrified by how it ended and I can also remember the day where out of curiosity I looked up the show’s finale after finding out the show ended and needless to say I was utterly horrified and disturbed when I read the whole plot synopsis considering that Star essentially committed GENOCIDE and she is is supposed to be the HERO.
@@maynot hi there mate So yeah, i am still a fan of SVTFOE, drawing fanarts of it even You can call me a loyal knight of the show lol, as i like all of it no matter what, and nothing changes my mind As for why i am still a fan of a so called trainwreck of a show... sorry, no elaboration
I'm glad you addressed how selfish Vanellope was, and how she went Turbo without the movie addressing it. That really pissed me off because in a GOOD movie they would have addressed it. She never even tells anyone other than Ralph and she only told him because he forced the issue. And the movie paints him as 100% in the wrong. Normally your protagonist learns what a selfish asshole they've been and they take steps to correct it. Not Vanellope. She actually gets more selfish after the end of the 1st movie. Remember Elsa? Or Simba? How they run away from their royal obligations and learn they have a duty to their people. Yeah that never happens for Vanellope.
The commentary on Belle being "kidnapped and enslaved" is so inaccurate. In Beauty and the Beast Belle see's her father in danger (I think? Something that makes her need to go back home) on the magic mirror and leaves the castle with the consent and knowledge of the Beast who allows her to leave knowing she must save her father. It is then when she is attacked by wolves on her horse in the woods that the Beast saves her, lying on the ground hurt from injuries. She at then point could have abandoned the Beast and continue home, but she /chooses/ to go back and save him and nurse his wounds due to being grateful for him saving her and letting her leave. So no I agree I don't think she was not really kidnapped or enslaved!
You actually only have one sequence of events that’s incorrect. Belle didn’t leave the castle the first time because she saw her father in the mirror (this happens long after she brings Beast back to heal him), she left because she entered the west wing and nearly touched the rose, which caused Beast to freak out and scare her off. The rest of your sequence of events is accurate.
Then people do Belle dirty especially considering that she is probably one of the smartest "princesses" in general probably only challenged by the badass Mulan
@@TetsuRiken They do all the princesses dirty because of popular misconceptions. It's why they get live action remakes that's supposed to "correct" the animated films
Vanellope leaving Sugar Rush for Slaughter Race at the end reminds me of when Woody left Bonnie for Bo Peep at the end of Toy Story 4. It didn't bother me on first viewing, but after having it explained to me through a UA-cam analysis video similar to this (actually a series by UA-camr GamingMagic13), I completely understand why that was the wrong direction to take and how it completely goes against not only the character's role in society but also what they stand for.
Really? Woody leaving never actually bothered me, it actually made sense for me! However there's something I still can't stand... Bonnie is such an annoying kid in this movie and they try to justify her actions as if kids can't appreciate something being gifted to them as "important" But that might be just me
I was going to guess toy story 4 for the other of his worst trilogy. Woody didn’t just leave Bonnie, he left everyone and went against his entire character for three films.
I actually despise GamingMagic’s 6+ hour analysis on TS4 because its literally a load of bullshit that’s honestly tiresome to watch. Like I get it, your entitled to your own opinion and everything… but are you seriously going to dig so low to literally hate a Pixar movie for 6 hours? Go outside and touch fucking grass And on top of that, let me just explain things clearly. Ralph Breaks the Internet began this trend where at the end of a movie, the main character splits apart and goes on their own and I honestly really hate it just like Twist villains. In the case of TS4, at least it was justifiable because Woody was still selfless for others and his friends understood that while he cared for them… he should be out there and not collecting dust in Bonnie’s closet. Woody wasn’t being PLAYED with in TS4 that THAT’S why he left the group. He didn’t choose to leave because he wanted to be with Bo, or he was being “selfish”. He left because he wanted to help other lost toys become found and his purpose of being played with by Bonnie was over. In Ralph Breaks the Internet, Vanellope leaving Ralph is at least okay but it still doesn’t make a ton of sense considering she’s still going turbo and I’m pretty sure the Sugar Rush game would be misprogramed/others would notice her disappearance and call the game broken. Also let’s not forget about the fact that if Vanellope dies, she perma dies since she was never programmed to be in Slaughter Race in the first place but the movie never acknowledges this once. This is the problem with UA-cam criticisms and these dumb, overdramatic, long “analysis” videos where a person’s ego will literally manipulate their audience, and others will take their word as “fact” without even watching or examining the film themselves. Its sad to see people who honestly call certain films “bad” simply because of another youtuber that manipulates scenes and viewpoints just to prove that their ego and opinions are “correct” ffs
@@cloudshines812 Yeah, but the problem is Woody already had that crisis in Toy Story 1 and 2. Buzz shows up and Woody isn't being played with and he has to come to terms with the fact that it doesn't matter, it is still his 'duty' as a toy to be there whenever Andy needs him. In TS2, that's when you get the semi-selfish choice of being part of the roundup gang because he thought he wasn't wanted by Andy. Even Jessie's story says this. The purpose of a toy is to be loved by a child. TS4 goes against this by having the 'man' who literally says this in multiple movies go against his ethos and never be loved by a child again, on top of abandoning his friends. I haven't watched GamingMagic's video. But TS4 and RBtI gave me extremely similar vibes. Out of all the Pixar films, those two are the ones I avoid. I even like Onward better than these two.
You know, anytime someone calls attention to the breaking of gender roles it ultimately undermines the concept of gender equality by implying that this is an exception and not the status quo.
They weren't calling attention to the breaking of gender roles. They were calling attention to a gender role that was BARELY EVEN PRESENT IN THEIR MOVIES.
Ralph 1 movie: Learns to accept himself, learns his worth, makes awesome friend, makes up with everybody from his game, has friends in every abandoned character, giving them purpose in his own game, becomes mentor for the whole group of "villains" Ralph 2 movie: eboy? Vanellope 1 movie: Her life is destroyed by Turbo, appreciates having her own place with pieces of paper from candy, barely hoping for something more, gets more, beats everyone, becomes princess, forgives and becomes no.1 of her own game and is happy Vanellope 2 movie: Being a princess and best character of my own game? Nah, I want to go Turbo never speaking to my old friends and dumping and treating Ralph like trash, not listening to him at all seeing only bad things from what he does or says And it's seen AS GOOD THAT RALPH LETS HER GO TURBO?
I know, right? It’s like this: First movie Ralph temporarily leaves his game to get a medal. Everyone else: Oh no! Ralph’s gone Turbo! 😱 Second movie Vanellope permanently leaves her own game to live in Slaughter Race Everyone else: Just sips coffee like nothing bad is happening. How are these two movies written by the same person?
@sonicfan9144 I don't know how they could even think of this! You'd think Vanellope would be slightly, or even horribly traumatized from everything that happened. Turbo shunned her, made her out to be someone, or in this case, something bad (he doesn't even call her by her actual name until he manipulates Ralph), and even tried KILLING her! You would think Vanellope would be traumatized and realize quickly that what she's doing is wrong, and you'd also think the same would go for Ralph, considering Turbo manipulated him and probably saw him as a friend at one point considering both of their games were next to each other, and wouldn't want Vanellope to go down the same path Turbo selfishly took! Turbo even did some of this under a different name and alias. I hate the sequel so much.
Seriously though and you can't forget vanellope 2 movie: I worked so hard to accomplish my dreams and goals of finally becoming a racer and discovering who I am..... REMEMBER HOW MUCH I WANTED THAT ? WELL NOW FORGET THAT I'M GOING TO ABANDON MY GAME AND NOT THINK ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE I'M LEAVING AND IF THIS COULD PUT MY GAME IN DANGER !
My theory is that Turbo infiltrated Disney, then wrote this movie as propaganda, it's all just how he views it, Vanellope is the one doing Turbo, and Ralph is a brainless monster who's only good at finding Vanellope
That would be a pretty clever plot twist for this movie. Feels like it was originally meant to be like this until the last minute when it was force scrapped.
One thing I wished you'd addressed was how - Shank just effortlessly codes Vanellope into Slaughter Race OFFSCREEN. One of the major sources of drama in the 1st movie was the whole "if you die outside your game, you don't come back" thing. Yet Shank just...Codes Vanellope into the game easily. Why didn't Turbo do that? Just code himself into Sugar Rush. He was able to overwrite his entire persona, why couldn't he code himself into the game? Did he really never once consider he might die inside the game by crashing or something?
Notice how Turbo goes conveniently unmentioned throughout this entire movie. It's almost as if the writers knew about the whole "Going Turbo" aspect of the first film and strictly avoided bringing it up just so they could justify Vanellope not only going "Turbo" herself, but somehow getting that entire aspect of this game's world undone by the power of contrived "coding." If they could just code Turbo into Sugar Rush, then the entire premise of the first film falls apart and retroactively makes the first movie bad now too. Fuck RBTI.
Turbo DID code himself into Sugar Rush-in the scene where he enters the game code, there's this massive block for King Candy that obviously isn't supposed to be there. It's so janky and forced in that it falls apart when he engages in fisticuffs with Vanellope. So like... we're just supposed to believe that Shank is better at programming than Turbo was...?
@@petfriendamy Which shows how bad the writing in the sequel was. That Turbo went to all that trouble and it still was not enough to code himself into the game in a way that he would respawn after death.
@@jmaster4941 Not to mention disturbingly King Candy/Turbo posthumously got the last laugh since Vanellope ended up being no better then him with the only difference being that he was punished for it while she was not which is just INFURIATING.
There are so many issues with this movie, but if they absolutely had to get Sugar Rush unplugged then Ralph (whose game is *at least* 30 years old) would absolutely be familiar with the situation of other games getting unplugged. In the first movie, sure he was goofy, but he had pretty great emotional intelligence. When he’s talking to Felix at the beginning of the first movie he lies to him about not recognizing fireworks because he doesn’t want to outright confront him, he wants to give Felix a chance to include him in the festivities. Someone who can do *that* could absolutely recognize the severity and emotional turmoil that comes with a game getting unplugged.
GOD what about how he acted with Quibert????????? He has seen 30 years of games getting unplugged!!!! God I hate how aggressive this movie is in ruining the characters it’s just so bad
You know what's really hilarious about this movie? You know it's bad when there's another better movie older than this one (Shrek Forever After) that touchs on this concept in a more mature way. Sometimes, realizing what you have before it's gone is not a bad idea and I don't understand why this movie goes against its own game arcade rules to do that... makes no sense whatsoever. DreamWorks got the upper hand on this one...
Shrek Forever After is just a Shrek fanfic of It's a Wonderful Life tho. Not saying it's a bad movie, I love that Shrek movie. But the writers literally took the plot of It's a Wonderful Life.
Honestly, I argue that they could write a better movie than this- assuming they did read the Wikipedia plot of the first, which the writers of this one clearly didn’t.
It was the same writers (minus Jennifer Lee, who by her own account signed on late to WIR and didn't really write much for it compared to Phil Johnston) the crew wasn't the problem. If you look at the unused concepts there's tons of creative stuff (hell, Felix and Calhoun were supposed to always have a plot even in the final draft, but it was cut extremely late). The issue was Disney turning the movie into a Disney IP and internet commercial at the expense of the actual cast and story. This is likely why Rich Moore left Disney just a few months after RBTI came out. If you want a better sequel, I recommend the stories "Wreck-It Ralph 2" by jbwarner86 (FanFiction) and "Love Bug" by MotorChickenSmile (deviantart). Both are excellent WIR sequels, and the former was written specifically to fix RBTI.
Clearly you've never read fic by highschoolers who do wiki research. They are MONSTERS with the bare minimum if they like the look of the characters enough😭
I was always annoyed that ebay doesn't even work that way at all, you aren't forced to buy items at whatever max bid you put. It'd only be 2.5 or 5 over the max opposing bid... that amount would have actually made more sense with this plot too.
I remember watching this with my mom, and I found Ralph's obsessive behavior creepy... in the 1st show, he was an annoyed older brother, but now he's a parasitic, stupid, possessive, manipulative, and even predatory guy... I told mom that right off the bat, I hated the sequel she, of course, didn't understand or wanted to understand... Sad they ruined good characters...
Yeah I fucking hate how they dumbed down his character from a clever and respectable guy to an immature and stupid idiot to make all the female characters look smarter and "stronger" or some shit like that. His entire identity from the first movie ignored and devolved into essentially a pedophile doofus.
Rapunzel: Do people always assume your problems got solved because a big strong man showed up? Me, who, at the tender age of thirteen, gained an earth-shattering new perspective on what loving someone really means when I first watched the raw, unbridled SELFLESSNESS both Eugene and Rapunzel display in the final act of Tangled: GURL, I WILL SLAP YOU THROUGH MY COMPUTER MONITOR On a more serious note, Wreck-it-Ralph is easily in my top ten Disney films. It's a loving homage to gaming that never sacrifices its well-told story and great characters for the sake of cheap references. And the core of the story, being about two outcasts finding each other and becoming friends, is such a universally appealing concept that even people who've never so much as touched a game of any kind can still genuinely enjoy the movie. Going from that to....whatever the heck Ralph Breaks the Internet was is one of the biggest cases of tonal whiplash I think I've ever experienced. So I loved hearing you pick it apart in the way it truly deserves. Also thought I should mention I love your choice in music for all these videos. ✨
The only enjoyable aspect for me in this movie was the Sonic cameo. I would say seeing the Disney Princess's in 3D was also kind of cool but they essentially got rid of all of the Princess's flaws! Rapunzel had a slight over bite in her movie, in THIS movie they completely changed her head shape so that her over bite was gone. Snowhite and Cinderella both had small but beautiful eyes in their own movies, her there eyes are HUGE to match the "modern Disney artsyle". And they straight up gave Tiana a new skin tone! Cause hey, remember when Tiana was dark and had jet black hair? In this movie they made her skin 10x lighter and gave her brown hair....unbelievable. Edit: Another thing I forgot to mention was the Snowhite and Cinderella both had wider waists than the average Disney Princess as of today. Animation was 10x harder back then and bigger shapes were easier to animate. So when animation upgraded they started to give the Princess's smaller waists and arms. In this movie they have the same body shape as the other Princesses!!
That's because they're not the actual princesses cameo-ing in the flesh in this movie, since they're not real people in this universe. Those are virtual avatars of the princesses that a website spits out when someone takes a "Which Princess Are You?" quiz, so they only have a few personality traits. Clark Spencer mentioned this in an interview (not sure if I can link without getting a Spam flag) and there's a physical guidebook to the movie that also mentions it. It's really a testament to how Disney wanted to cram their own properties where they didn't belong to the point of reaching this far, and then giving them more screentime than Felix and Calhoun, 2/4 of the main cast
Yesssss. The 2D princesses who were "three dimensionalized" were so aesthetically off-putting, I scowled and winced when I watched for the first time. Cinderella, Pocahontas, Mulan, Belle, and Snow White just...ugh, they got did SO DIRTY.
@Andromeda14161 All the more reasons why I have been favoring DreamWorks for their art direction over Disney. I understand that Disney has a certain "brand" that they want to keep going but DreamWorks doesn't have a brand, and because of that I have a lot more respect for them than I do for any other animation studio because they're more open to taking risks. In the trolls world everything looks like it was made from arts and crafts, in HTTYD everything looks rough and misshapen and they aren't afraid of making their dragons as terrifying as possible if necessary. Almost no DreamWorks movie looks like it can be in the same universe which gives all of their movies such a fresh look. Yet even so many years later Disney STILL can't help but use the same style for every movie since Repunzel and it's getting super repetitive and boring. Seeing Pocahontas, Snowhite, Cinderella, Belle, and Mulan with these enormous eyes and be in the "modern" Disney artsyle made them look so incredibly off
Disney also having the audacity to be like “DOeS EverYonE AssUme YoUr ProBlEms Are SolVed By a MaN?” When they were literally the company that perpetuated that trope in first place?? Like why is Aurora agreeing in that scene? She would be dead if her boyfriend didn’t slay a literal dragon for her??? In her case, nobody is “assuming” anything, that is exactly what happened.
@quetzalpacheco Maleficent’s backstory in a nutshell: (Let’s be real, they gave her the stupidest backstory ever. I could’ve come up with a better one)
Tbh, the prince rarely did the saving. He usually had no character, rarely had a name and kinda showed up as a prize after the story was over. I mean, Snow White was saved by dwarves, Cinderella was saved by mice. Technically Phillip slew a dragon, but that was after he was rescued by the fairies.
@@amberg3893 Imo that just makes the quote even more baffling. Like, most people who watched these movies know how the problem is resolved. In some movies, it really IS the efforts of the prince which save the princess, such as in Aladdin or The Little Mermaid, and so to discredit their heroic deeds is extremely disingenuous. In some, it's another outside force, like in the movies you mentioned. Sometimes it's the princess herself, such as in Mulan. And in some, it's BOTH of their efforts that resolve the overarching conflict, which is the case with Tangled, WHICH RAPUNZEL IS THE PRINCESS FROM. Not only is the line itself just bizarre to include, but to have Rapunzel say it is absolutely insulting to the original movie. Nobody who watched the movie thought Eugene was the one to solve all the conflict; it's blatantly clear that it was a result of both characters working together. The line should not have been included at all since it not only adds nothing of substance to the movie, but acts as an insult to nearly every single old Disney princess movie.
You can't really blame Disney. That's just how they were back then. Honestly their movies from back then are better because they are not preaching about politics and gender shit in your face 24/7
@thebottomtext With the franchise now RUINED beyond repair I do wish somebody could do a film inspired by Wreck It Ralph that is also set in the arcade with lots of cameos from real video game characters but sadly that will likely never happen since Disney will likely sue any film merely inspired by it not to mention the cancer known as wokeness has infected film companies.
@@Mario87456 mabe Disny will retcon Ralph breaks the internet out of existance and try to make a good sequel and hire a good director that can put the franchise back on track.
I’ve heard a couple of people defend Vanellope’s actions by bringing up the way she was treated in the first movie. “Even after her code restored and the Sugar Rush racers apologizing and accepting her again, that doesn’t erase the past trauma of being bullied and ostracized by them” or something along those lines, and as a result they find her leaving for another game valid. Well, see, if that was what Disney was going for, they would’ve AT LEAST implied the idea that Vanellope wanted to leave behind Sugar Rush because of the reminder of said trauma, then maybe it would have been A LITTLE MORE understandable. But no, the writers left it simply at her being bored. It’s clear they didn’t think beyond this reasoning for Vanellope leaving, which is unsurprising considering they didn’t think other things through like Felix “covering” for Ralph during the arcade’s open hours, or how Vanellope will literally get terminated from Slaughter Race in the next server patch when the devs randomly see a character that’s not supposed to be there.
V bird was ass to Ralph for being concerned They did all that work just for her to hope in a whole new game She wanted to race the whole time in first movie and once she can do it she gets bored and jumps out of a racing game to hop back into a racing game
Not to mention Vanellope was mocking the other racers during the first 10 minutes. If she was still affected from trauma, she wouldn’t have acted like a jerk to everyone else
@@t1mburt0nsdandruffI know I'm kinda late, but tbh you're right. Maybe Vanellope being upset at losing a race because she could be mocked*, but everyone else is completely casual and not even rubbing it in her face could be a good example of this. * Maybe for the fun of it, she lost in an incredibly stupid way
13:49 Actually, there is one good thing about this scene. The sign Ralph threw destroyed Miranda Sings’ internet, thus saving kids from encountering her.
Ralph was a jerk in this movie. Not only did he let a horrible virus who killed a millions of innocents characters AND almost killed Vaneloppe too but he never felt guilty. Also, he didn't think about telling his plan to Felix or checking how he is. That was so selfish! Ralph only tough about what he wants, not what Vaneloppe wants. She wasn't nice too. The kid literally abandoned all the players who liked her AND her duties as the princess of Sugar rush. All that is useless to her unlike a stranger she met during a few minutes. The kid knows nothing about Shanks except that she looks cool and have a fancy car; that's it! So one of the message is it's fint to run from your responsabilities to stay with a stranger? Wrong! This is selfish and cruel, what a villain would do not a heroine 😠😤The writers really didn't understand thoses two characters!
@@kevinlee7678 It really did ruin Vanellope's character for me. Literally the whole point of her arc in the first film was to be accepted by the other racers and find her place as a character Sugar Rush. Then the 2nd film just completely shat on it by having her say "yeeeahhh screw this noise I'm leaving"..like what was the point of making her a princess then?
She went Turbo like what Turbo did in the last one and this movie did not make sense compared to the first movie set up, what are the writers thinking?!?! Did they watched the first movie or forgot about it and only remembered certain scenes, also only way to redeem this if they make a sequel that Venelope went Turbo and finds out a bit of Turbo's code leaked into her code at some point at the end of the first one as a way for Turbo to save himself from deletion and probably that wasn't the first time he did it because he may have done it to the King by overwriting the code of that guy to become one and save himself from such, that's the only way to explain this if a third movie happens, also Ralph learns this and have to save Venelope before she gets overwritten and deleted forever, so yeah
This movie made me hate Vanellope's character as a whole. I disliked the fact that Vanellope was entirely willing to let her world die just because ooooh videogame cool im staying here. My biggest gripe with this movie is that Vanellope's doing EXACTLY what the first movie told us NOT to do.
@@bradwhite5884 Don’t give them any ideas please since as bad as Ralph Breaks The Internet was they could still do a lot WORSE in a third movie and I would rather not see that happen.
What really threw me off was the hypocrisy on going turbo between Ralph and Vanellope. When Ralph did it, it was seen as an unholy horrendous thing. But when Vanellope did it and abandoned her game nobody batted an eyelash. Wasn't the whole point of her arc in the first movie was to be seen as an actual legit character in her game and be respected by the other kids in sugar rush?
Posthumously King Candy/Turbo got the last laugh at Vanellope ended up being no better then him but instead of getting punished for it she gets REWARDED for it which is just INFURIATING!!!
The FIRST Wreck it Ralph movie will always and forever be a cinematic masterpiece 😌 Unlike whatever the hell they were going for with Wreck it Ralph 2: Ralph Breaks the Internet... 😒
@@PussInBootsTheLastWishFan2003 That's your opinion, may look good does not automatically make it a masterpiece, there has to be a good story and so much more to be considered good for it to be a masterpiece, but this movie undermines the first one, so yeah
Another point that bothers me. The messaging being "dont become clingy and insecure" does not show how to deal with the feelings of insecurity and need to be clingy in the first place. All it tells someone going through this is "stop rn and if you don't know how other than by self-destructing and leavinc everyone close to you, then you're an even worse person than you thought!"
The first time I watched this movie, I left the theater with a bad taste in my mouth. Ralph’s behavior was so creepy, and super clingy. The first movie was all about the consequences of going turbo, only to have Vanellope go turbo. It was like watching a movie with totally different characters.
I know I commented a while back but there's one more thing. Disney, STOP RUINING YOUR PRINCESS CHARACTERS. They had well established personalities and still were important to their stories in ways more interesting ways than just being "strong".
@allenharper2928 That's literally all I have to look forward to. And even then it's clear that the upcoming movies that'll be represented will be these dumpster fires.
My question is- why couldnt it be Vanellope being the one who is clingy and needing to learn not to be clinging to her "one and only best friend" if they wanted to keep that plot- or hell make the movie about Ralph and Felix, since Felix was the only person who wasn't a complete jerk (from what i remember at least its been a bit since I saw the original) to him at the start- and yknow- both Felix and Ralph are ADULTS- and its kinda weird how this movie portrays Ralph (an adult) being so obsessive and clingy to a literal child instead of a more fatherly or brotherly friendship they had in the first??? Which is also why I feel like the film would do better if Vanellope was the one who was being clingy, she could even have a moment of finding that "dream game to go turbo in" and have a realization that she wants that sort of change but because of how much she clings to Ralph for support it challenges her in multiple ways which helps her grow into being a better and less clingy friend. It could have been such a easy fix where they didn't have to straight up butcher Ralph as a character.
Honestly yeah, Vanellope in the first movie acted all buddy buddy to Ralph when they were working together and when they became friends. Considering Vanellope was an emotional kid that was alone for who knows how long, it'd make more sense for her to be the clingy one. That would have been better
As someone who really likes Venelope and finds a lot of comfort in her because of my disabilities the sheer anger Rokotar has over how they treat it in Ralph breaks the internet makes me very happy
Yeah it seems like a good Disney sequel only happens once in a blue moon, the Toy Story sequels are some of the only Disney sequels that can be considered good, mostly the 2nd and 3rd movie though, the 4th really didn’t need to happen, but I don’t hate it as much as some other people, even some more obscure sequels like Lion King 2 Simba’s pride, and Cinderella 3 A Twist in Time are actually great sequels as well. Here’s to hoping that Inside Out 2 will be as good or better than the original when it comes out in 2024. Side note: I think I’ve heard a rumor that an original paper was discovered not that long ago that was written by Walt Disney himself that said something like wishing that sequels, reboots, or remakes never be made from movies that are made by the company Disney itself. Maybe that was a sign that the company Disney itself should listen to if that’s actually true, in order to respect Walt Disney’s wishes.
What’s also funny is that strangely Dreamworks hasn’t gone full woke yet unlike Disney and many other American companies though unfortunately they have gone woke to some extent such as with that horrid woke She Ra reboot which is utterly woke to the point of absurdity.
Doing the math on the price of the wheel shows that Sugar Rush shouldn't have still been plugged in anyway. The wheel is $200 and the owner says that's more than the game makes in a year. That means Sugar Rush is making less than 75 cents on average every day. No one is playing it and it isn't even worth using electricity regardless of it working or not.
This is quite literally a “look how they massacred my boi” moment. Honestly one of the biggest reasons this movie upsets me is just how they took everything I loved from the first film (which is honestly still one of my favorite Disney films of all time) and threw it all out the window. I do think the fact that Disney wanted to touch on toxic friendships in this movie was actually pretty cool, but in doing so they completely botched both Ralph and Vanellope’s characters which is just really infuriating. Overall I really liked this breakdown of the movie it was pretty entertaining the whole way! (And I always get a kick out of people trashing on this movie.)
In case you don't already know, that one isn't a sequel movie. It's a feature length pilot episode to the Megamind Rules TV series. Dreamworks poorly advertised it enough that the public has been mistaking it to be a sequel to the first movie. If it was a sequel movie then they would have released it theatrically and made it with a higher budget, instead of having it be made by Peacock and be released strait onto that company's streaming service.
Much like the first movie, Sonic’s cameos are the best thing about this film, to me! With good writing and voice direction, Roger Craig Smith sounds fantastic! However, the difference is that Sonic is one of the many things that makes the first movie the masterpiece it is, while in this movie, he’s one of the few things that prevents this movie from being the complete disaster it is. “You do and you don’t? Duality. That’s very deep, Ralph.” “Thanks, Sonic.” 🦔💙
Honestly I feel it's a disservice to the first movie that the cameos get so hyped up when it has fantastic original characters (like if people went nuts over a Power Rangers toy in Toy Story instead of the cast) but the second movie is so cameo-oversaturated (more screen time than Felix and Calhoun, half the damn main cast) that there's not much else sadly I did like that we got to see a bit of the arcade's culture, like how the Bad-Anon room is used for a book club too, that was cute
This movie just gives me many frustrating questions, like: Why couldn’t Ralph/Vanellope just wait until nighttime for the new shortcut, or even let players discover it on their own? Why were people hating on Ralph as if he was real, even though nobody knows that there’s a secret world inside of video games/the internet? That’s like if I went onto the Nintendo Switch Parental Control video and just started randomly insulting bowser’s appearance. And the one that goes against the original movie the most- Why did Ralph and Vanellope just forget or not care about all the dangerous stuff and risky stuff that can happen when you ‘go Turbo’?!
ralph and valnelope's relationship goes from a cute found family father-daughter shared trauma relationship. to what feels borderline like Chris Hansen should be notified.
36:50 well Turbo went to the other game not because it was cooler, but because it was better than him and he craved ALL OF THE ATTENTION. But yeah it’s still selfish for Vanellope to leave
I refuse to believe that the Ralph in this movie is the same Ralph from the first one. Maybe there's two Ralphs that live in the dump, and the real Ralph just got lost back there and the Ralph in this destructive Ralph took over their game
Good theory. The real Ralph after the 2012 film may have either A. Got buried between the dumps allowing BTI Ralph to roam free. B. Real Ralph passed out in Tapper's again or something, thus allowing BTI Ralph to also roam free. C. BTI Ralph kidnapped the real Ralph and locked him away in a cage, just to ruin his whole career.
Judy Hopps: Wreck-It-Ralph (Ralph Breaks the Internet) you're under arrest Ralph: For what? Nick Wilde: Here are all your crimes: Number One, being in Sugar Rush during live arcade hours in LitWak's Arcade when you should be in your game, Fix-It-Felix Jr. which could have gotten it unplugged, Number Two, Being a man-child and a complete idiot with no intelligence whatsoever and not acting your age and being an overly clingy best friend to Vanellope when you should have been an overprotective father or older brother. Number Three, indirectly getting Sugar Rush unplugged leaving it’s residents homeless and not comforting Vanellope when she was in pain over it since your too full of yourself to do so, number four, trying to shoplift the Sugar Rush steering wheel on EBay, number five, throwing a temper tantrum and damaging someone’s internet connection with an EBay billboard crushing their internet avatar, number six, forcing people to watch your videos on BuzzTube though you did have a permit to upload them all, and the last worst ones of all, trying to steal Shank’s car in Slaughter Race for money and getting a computer virus, Arthur from Double Dan and crashing Slaughter Race with it and having your Ralph Clones almost destroy and crash the entire internet and World Wide Web!!!! Ralph: (Remorseful) EBoyyyy Princess Vanelope: Well, at least I am let off the hook. First Order stormtroopers: Not so fast, kid you are still under arrest for doing a pop-up add without a permit in Oh My Disney and trying to go Turbo and take over Slaughter Race. Ralph: Oh well, prison it is! We will have time to think over our actions while we are there!
It’s baffling to know that Ralph Breaks the Internet has a Rotten Tomato score of 88%, yet Wreck-it Ralph has a score of 87%, even though I’m sure the vast majority of us here would agree that Wreck-it Ralph is way better than Ralph Breaks the Internet.
Agreed. In my opinion, the first one is better. But not because the second one sucks. I think it’s good but not amazing or anything 7/10. But yeah, The first Wreck-it-Ralph is a cinematic masterpiece 10/10.
Rotten Tomatoes and Critics don’t deserve to be taken seriously anymore especially considering what they think are good movies like the aforementioned Ralph Breaks The Internet and Cuties not to mention Rotten Tomatoes isn’t above rigging the critic and audience scores like with The Woman King (a rather terrible movie). They also hated on The Super Mario Bros. Movie for the stupidest reasons ever.
I still remember the climax of the final fight, where Ralph recited the villains association oath while holding onto the medal from Vanellope, and I teared up there. Ralph wasn't lonely, he was, kinda, but he was more like tired of being labelled as bad and evil simply because he's the antagonist of his game. That's why seeing Ralph in the sequel really rubbed me the wrong way, not only that it's creepy that he acted like that when he's a freaking grown man obsessed over his child friend, it's like Rockotar said, it's not like Vanellope was his only friend! He has Felix, the NPCs in the game accepted him after the ending, and then he should have his fellow villain association buddies! But the most of all, the sequel actively destroyed that scene from the first movie for me. That scene was where he found peace, his answer, he doesn't have to be "good", because there's still someone who loved and cared for him for who he was, he even solidified it in his closing line to the movie. The sequel then basically turned him into a manbaby who throws a tantrum because he can't have his friend for himself. Vanellope was awfully done too, don't get me wrong, but it's just insidious how dirty they did Ralph after his emotional journey that resonates with a lot of people who struggled with their sense of belonging. It's sad that not many people realize just how bad this movie is.
I told myself that the website understood them as two different users so they were bidding against /each other/. It's been a minute since I watched this trainwreck though lol.
@psychotophatcat Yes, they counted as two users bidding against each other. And yes, the eBay auctioneer should have been able to easily recognize that these two "competing bidders" who were giggling together were in obvious collusion to spam the price up.
What Rapunzel should have asked Vanellope was: “Was your rightful identity hidden from you by a villain for their own selfish, self-centered reasons?” But then I guess they would have had to acknowledge Turbo’s existence, therefore making apparent how bad the writing choice for Vanellope's character was.
That would have been one of the best lines of the movie since it would have threaded both movies together better...but screw that
In fact, if you change villain to “someone you thought you could trust”, aurora could have been included in that statement as well, that’s way way better than the “bIG StrOnG mAn” quote.
This take destroys this movie
The worst part is, she straight up did the Disney song thing that she made fun of earlier and got what she wanted. Like, what the Hell.
Whats turbo
The first movie "Don't mess with the program and go turbo".
The second movie "Mess with the program and go turbo".
mess everything and never have second thoughs
the internet got ralphified
all you can find is now: a jumble of ralphs
like the bugs from the shooter game but they're all ralphs
I think Felix must have asked Q Beert and his friends to play the role as the antagontists in Fix-It Felix as the ones wrecking the building for Felix to fix in Ralph’s place while he and Vanellope were in the internet trying to buy the Sugar Rush steering wheel from ebay during open arcade hours at Lipwak’s Arcade to fix and save Sugar Rush from being unplugged and must have also did so while Ralph was making Vanellope a new racing track also during open arcade hours.
All this reminds me of that meme of: "We made the Torment Nexus from the famous award winning book:'Don't make the Torment Nexus'"
She really didn't go 'Turbo'. Sugar Rush can and has functioned without her and she was invited to join Slaughter Race.
Ralph Breaks The Internet? Why didn't they name it Ralph Wrecks The Internet!? THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!
that was the first thing that should've alerted me to how poorly they were gonna make this movie. Heck- i felt the wave of dread as soon as they mentioned the internet
They even commented on it in the trailer
Came down here to make the exact same comment lmao. It's difficult for me to remember that it's "breaks" and not "wrecks" even now. Fortunately, I never have to think about this movie (unless I'm watching a UA-cam video destroying it).
"Because 'breaks the internet' is like a thing" the second I heard that line in the trailer I knew it was gonna be awful.
Just shows how’s much thought they put into this movie, little to none
When I was in elementary school, I had a dream about a Wreck-It-Ralph sequel. All I can remember from it is Vanellope and Taffyta building a snow man out of ice cream but it was a ton better than this actual sequel we got many years later.
The idea of Vanellope and Taffyta being besties is super cute, I hope the timeline where the sequel was actually has that.
That IS better, Fnf pfp
That's actually kinda wholesome
The fact that a dream, which is randomly made by brainy science stuff, is better than a human-made movie that costed millions, really says a lot about those writers.
Bro thats literally just frozen
The worst sin they committed was promising us Felix and Calhoun then never even showing them for more then one minute
Another terrible sin that is arguably just as bad as the one you mentioned is the fact that they LIED about including Mario. Yes they did and NO ONE can convince me otherwise.
Biggest disappointment of the movie honestly.
It honestly made me mad. They’re such a wholesome couple-actually that’s why they didn’t because it would’ve been nice to see them and therefor shouldn’t be shown.
@@Mario87456 IM IN TEARS FROM LAUGHING YOUR PROFILE WORKS SO WELL FOR THIS
Yeah, I was thinking the exact same thing.
I always hated how Vanellope gets supported and praised for wanting to do the exact same thing Turbo did in the first movie, but it gets totally handwaved away by her code being fixed offscreen. It's such a blatant case of protagonist-centred morality.
also I wonder
If the characters can "fix the code" what was stopping them from having Vanellope return home, and having Slaughter Race have some re occurring crossover event on the days the arcade is closed? That way she could visit the game and have her new thrill and not completely destroy the logic established in the first movie.
It would still not be an "amazing" ending but better than what we got. It would be like "You don't need to leave your life behind to explore new things"
shank got vanellope’s code in tbe game dw
Feminism. It's ok if women do it.
she arguably has even less of a reason than turbo at least he was afraid of falling out of relevance
@@kingdedede5570 yeah and really the only reason she wanted to leave was because she was bored of her old game
Ralph Before: *Runs into a giant nest of bugs that could literally kill him for a medal.*
Raplh Now: *Is too scared to confront a group of 'hooligans' that he could literally kill by swinging his massive arms*
THANK YOU!
Fr
@CarbonGod666Stop simping for this dumpster fire it's embarrassing
@@amicableenmity9820 bro literally just said "ok" what are you on about
@@spedur3361 it’s gotten so bad now that saying “ok” is simping now 😔
The most unrealistic part is how the in-universe creators of wreck it Ralph didn’t copyright strike ralph for making videos about wreck it Ralph
I will never forgive Vanellope for basically going Turbo and abandoning all her friends and subjects just to play/live in a internet game she spent a few days in. What if they close down Sugar Rush because she's gone? What if they shut down Slaughter Race because the players think Vanellope is a glitch? Or the game is discontinued because the players don't like the new kid character? I can't believe that the players of both games would be happy about this!
It wasn't a few days; it was a few hours.
@@Disneyfan82 A few hours that makes it's so much worse!
Considering the fact that Vaneollpe went Turbo posthumously King Candy/Turbo got the last laugh as she ended up being no better then him and yet instead of her going Turbo being portrayed as a bad thing it’s portrayed as a GOOD thing. The sheer hypocrisy of it is INFURIATING and DISGUSTING!!!
@@Mario87456 That's why this movie is the worst that defies the point of the first film
@@Disneyfan82 Not to mention disturbingly King Candy/Turbo was RIGHT about Vaneollpe since she ended up being a glitch in a way (becoming part of a game she was never supposed to be apart of in the first place) if those idiot directors Bitch Moore and Dildo Johnston didn’t start to work on that furry pandering SJW mess known as Zootopia before they made the sequel this film likely wouldn’t have been as bad as it ended up being as it doesn’t help that many of the same people who worked on Ralph Breaks The Internet also worked on Zootopia like the aforementioned Bitch Moore and Dildo Johnston and it also doesn’t help that Nick Wilde made a brief yet very notable cameo in Ralph Breaks The Internet.
The first Wreck it Ralph was very good and a tribute to old arcade games without going through problems of references over story. Instead Ralph Breaks The Internet follows modern outdated comedy and assassinates Ralph and Vanellope.
Agreed. I hardly recognised Ralph when I first saw this movie! He felt more like a guy pretending to be him! 😞
I thought you meant ralph assassinated somebody.. Like with a sniper rifle.
@@doodoofartman Omegasus.
They should of made a sequel if Ralph and vanelope upgrades to the 3d environment in home consoles
@@doodoofartman i would rather watch that than this movie.
I still can't believe Vanellope goes Turbo, after all she went through in the last movie, and no one calls her out on it.
I wish Vanellopi suddenly had the greyish hue like Turbo and slowly became a monster through the movie.
Yeah, they literally ignored this, but only way to fix this movie if the third movie deals with Venelope going Turbo and somehow Turbo may have altered her code or added his code in it so he can survive somehow if in case and Venelope is slowly turning into him as her code is almost being overwritten and only way to save her is to bring her back home and reset her before they lose her forever, also introduce a different Turbo that isn't the same as the one from the other one but is actually good and all, so yeah
@@bradwhite5884 That sounds way too difficult for modern Disney to do.
It essentially means that in the end King Candy/Turbo posthumously got the last laugh since Vanellope ended up being no better then him but instead of it being portrayed as a bad thing for Vanellope to do it is instead portrayed as a GOOD thing for Vanellope to do which is just INFURIATING!!!
@@Mario87456 this is so indescribably hilarious to me the entire movies message was about Vanellope finding her place and now in the sequel she leaves that place she worked so hard to find because... she met some random girl... for a few hours... very realistic! i find it so funny that either the writers were so incompetent they didn't see this GLARING flaw or they just didn't give a fuck or possibly the worst one they thought it was good writing
Edit: apparently according to some other guys comment the movies plot was supposed to be completely different as seen in the artbook but the morons running disney didn't like an actually good sequel so they made this garbage instead
Megamind VS The Doom Syndicate Releases:
Ralph Breaks the Internet: Finally, a worthy opponent. Our battle will be legendary!
Ok let's face it. Megamind 2 is even worse. Ralph Breaks the Internet at least has its funny jokes and have stunning animation. Megamind 2 on the other hand has half-assed animations that came straight out of cocomelon, full of lame jokes, and somehow looks even worse than the first movie.
@@p3mcthedoor32 i agree
@@p3mcthedoor32they have somehow massacres my childhood movie,and I won't forgive them for that
@@p3mcthedoor32to be honest... you're right. This film is bad and all, but at least it had higher production values. Both are atrocities in their own right though.
I've heard someone say that this movie isn't just bad but also dangerous.
1. It teaches kids that it's super easy to become an internet sensation
2. It teaches kids that it's easy to win a crap ton of money through UA-cam videos in just a few hours
3. It teaches kids that if you're bored with your life than it's perfectly okay to abandon everything else behind for something new.
4. It teaches kids that you can easily hack the internet
5. It teaches kids that it's okay to talk to strangers on the internet
The movie's portrayal of the internet in general is just highly illogical. How does making money on BuzzTube even work? It comes from people giving you hearts? How does that even work? It makes no sense. Neither does Ralph making all of these edited videos in less than a third of a day. The movie also does not go into the negative impacts/challenges of grinding content like Ralph does (burnout, copyright challenges, demonetisation, etc).
But for something more on topic, another potentially dangerous thing the movie presents to kids is the dark web. By having the dark web in the movie (and in a not subtle way), it teaches people the existence of the dark web and some kids may actually end up on the dark web and possibly do something stupid because they saw it in this movie. The movie doesn't portray the dark web in a positive light to be fair but it still shows this real world thing to children and some of them may end up on the dark web because the movie told them it's bad.
6. It teaches kids that toxic friends and overall terrible people deserve everything they desire.
¿?
Honestly number 5 isn't that bad. You just have to be careful. Don't tell them personal details and tell your parents if they ask for anything too close for you. But other than that, talking to people isn't that bad, it actually made me feel like I could talk to people more IRL
Honestly, a major part of the internet is the ability to talk to strangers. It seems rather underwhelming if kids are just not able to partake in a pretty significant part of the internet. They just obviously need to be careful with strangers, not revealing personal information or anything like that.
Ralph acting like an obsessive best friend caught me off guard. His relationship with Vanellope in the first movie was more like found family. They were both outcasts, and because of that developed a bond similar to a father and daughter or older brother and younger sister. Ralph had fun hanging out with Vanellope, but was never a man child about it, a prime example being the time he built an entire race track for her. They still had fun, but Ralph building the track for Vanellope was like a father making something special for their kid. He was also usually the voice of reason and always prioritized safety. All that wholesomeness was taken away in the second movie and their relationship just seemed strange and toxic.
bro.... don't make me cry like that.... 😭😭😭. im getting heavy 2014 nostalgia
Same!! My love for the "reluctant parent/older sibling and child they found and adopted" trope came from them too 😭😭
@@meme_lover.69 what the FUCK are those?????
I will smoothly diverge from the popular opinion in this thread and claim that the realtionship between Ralph and Venellope is toxic and strange by design. The second movie is about change. Their character arc reacts to the changes that relationship goes through.
For Venellope most things are amazing, she is finally at the top but still something feels out of place. This is a normal response to reaching ones goal and then being faced with the loss of direction. This is also expanded on later in the movie when she is faced with the very normal motive in a children's, how to accept change and see the opportunity in ones future. This motive also appears in Moana, The lion king, Rapunzel and more. It's really just a common theme in children's movies, because its a common theme that children faces sooner or later.
Ralph on the other hand have never before had a real friend like Venellope but as she is a child, he have sometime a hard time deciding when to be the grown up figure. If you understand adult/child relationship this is a common theme, that the adult sometimes have a hard time deciding if they should be the adult/protector of the child or if they should be their buddy. You can't simply always be both, sometimes you gotta choose.
But i digress, what Ralp is dealing with for the first time in his life is trying to maintain a relationship while also going through the mundane that is a regular work day. On top of that Venellope livs across town so to speak. All this distance between them, both physically and metaphorically, turns Ralph into a toxic mental state where he is convinced that if he doesn't obsessively engage with Venellope, no matter the consequences, Ralph might loose her. This isn't rational, of course, because its based on fear. Ralph haven't fought through how his actions might affect their relationship , its the fear of drifting apart that drives him into a flight-or -fight response. In line with this toxic version of his character arc he chooses fight and who would blame him. He did fight a lot for Venellope in the last movie and it work, so when instilled with fear, why wouldn't one do something that worked last time.
Again I understand I divert from the popular opinion here..and I'm not suppose to tell you this...but I'm somewhat of a divergent.
@@Davi.A.B.2004 dafuq?
The thing that also upsets me about the whole “Big strong man saving you” line is the fact that MAJORITY OF THEM GOT SAVED BY THEMSELVES! Anna saved Elsa, Moana saved her home ( with the help of Maui, it wasn’t Maui that was the one who saved her or her home ultimately ), MULAN IS ONE WHO DIDN’T HAVE A BIG STRONG MAN SHOW UP TO SAVE HER! Tiana saved herself, Merida wasn’t even saved by a man she was saved by her MOM!
Disney or whoever wrote this movie probably never watched said movies. And then also yeah Knuckles’ quote.
And say whatever for Rapunzel, but she saved herself. She was the one to save herself from living a life without Eugene. She was the one who revived him and it was her who stood up against Gothel. Yeah sure Eugene saved her but ultimately Rapunzel was the one who saved herself in the end. She still knew how to fight without Eugene ( example: the whole scene with the lucky duckling inn and them running from the guards ). Jasmine had no choice, she was trapped in that hourglass drowning. Aurora was sleep, Snow White ate the apple but that wasn’t cause of a big man, THE DWARVES defeated the witch. And Cinderella you saved yourself from your step mother the prince was NOWHERE near you in that scene.
I just don’t understand how they could miss these important things on why most of these reasons are not why they’re princesses. They’re not why we look up to them. Again KNUCKLES QUOTE
Yeah, no one actually thinks the princesses did nothing important and were helpless compared to the men. The only ones even close to that were Philip and the dwarfs from Snow White, but even Phillip had essential help from the three fairies (all women) and Snow White was made in the freaking 30s (and still, compared to other 30s movies, has really not aged that badly at all). So why make up this nonsense other than to discredit the princes for some illogical reason?
@@Rockotarthepurplehatguy The Dwarfs also were charmed by Snow White's helpful persoanlity and they helped her because an evil Queen was hunting her down.
@@Rockotarthepurplehatguy Really, Sleeping Beauty was pretty much the only one who could've had most of the Princess Traits applied to her story, and she hardly gets any screen time because she's not very popular these days. If she's not popular, why is she apparently the blueprint??
What's also inaccurate is the fact when all of the princesses respond to vanellope that they didn't have a mom either, which is completely not true for some of the princesses since their mothers are STILL alive like aurora, mulan, moana, rapunzel, merida, and tiana. That is a absolute slap in the face to the princesses mothers and makes it more obvious that the writers didn't care to watch the princess movies or do any research and just called it a day by thinking all of the princesses are motherless.
The Nightmare Before Christmas is also Ralph Breaks The Internet done right with being tired of the same routine. While it was understandable of Jack to be tired of the same routine of Halloween every year and yes he did have good intentions for Christmas. He despite all his studies, still did more harm than good. In the end he compromised by while despite still doing the same routine, he tries to do something different next Halloween.
With the idea of doing something different in your own world, instead of Penelope leaving at the end, a better solution would be for Ralph and Felix to come in every so often to build a new track for Sugar Rush. Ralph has built a track before and Felix fixed the finish line, so it's not out of character. It also wouldn't cause problems to the game because I'm sure players would love for a new and fun track update every month or so.
@@ashleymueller8844 That’s a good idea. Also Jack unlike Vanellope was not willing to ditch his friends and his kingdom for something new and even wanted to get them involved in his new idea of Christmas.
Honestly I'm mad about the "big strong man" part. Rapunzel and Eugene sacrificed each other's lives for one another. He almost died/did die for her. She sacrificed her freedom and happiness and life for Eugene. I don't get why or never know why Disney HAS to ruin their best work
Because they don’t care. That’s what’s making Disney suck rat scrotes most of the time at filmmaking.
I mean, if we talk about TLM, BATB, Snow White... y'know, I defend them but I WOULD undertand if Disney feel somewhat ashamed of them (still, again, gonna defend those movies till' the end)
But TANGLED? That's already a "5 people didn't like it and that's why we pretend to be MODERN with it to make those 5 people or less change their minds'' case.
@@ethanrichard4950
She sacrificed her life and happiness when she chose to go with Mother Gothel in exchange for her sparing Eugene’s life
Oh, gotcha.
My misunderstanding.
@@ClaudetteViolettamovies apparently have to be appealing to the "woke feminists" (or to put it in more realistic terms man hating assholes)
You forgot a criticism.
In-Universe, Ralph & Vanellope are copyrighted characters. Ralph appearing in implied HD videos should get his company mad. Vanellope being in an internet MMO should get her company mad.
And yet the movie *never* mentions their companies!
I believe they have the same company, both were made by Tobikomi, but still a good point.
Tbf the first movie also raised similar questions when ralph invited the q-bert characters into a bonus stage, as crossovers dont just happen like that. but i find that way easier to gloss over and forgive as its just a cute side add on to the ending and not part of the literal main plot. + its only a feature in this one fix it felix jr machine in this specific arcade, so you can just assume the company didnt find out because mr. litwack didnt bother to report the bonus stage thats raking in profits, unlike the supposed millions of people that witnessed ralph and vanellope's antics here
@@MrCow-tg9jd Even long before the horrid sequel ever came to be I always did find it questionable that the Q*bert characters ended up in Fix It Felix Jr. at the end of the movie even with the fact that their game had been unplugged long ago it came across as just plain hypocritical to me even back when I watched the movie the first time in theaters.
The movie has a lot of plot holes but at least this one is explained, when the kids find a steering wheel on ebay litwalk does say that the company closed
Yeah we're also where was Sophia and Elena yeah
I feel like Ralph and Vanellope's dynamic could have worked much better if Ralph was more of an overprotective father or older brother to Vanellope
yea bc that is how he was in the first movie
What? You don’t like a man baby?
Nobody likes a man baby or any adult actually fully immature for that matter. (I know you were most likely joking, but no.)
Similarly, adding onto that, if I’d been given the wheel, I’d have Vanellope character arc be that of a pre-teen temper tantrum throughout the movie, realizing in the end that we sometimes have to sacrifice our personal desires for the greater good, and be content with what we have, ultimately choosing to return to Sugar Rush and visiting Shank every now and then.
Yeah, I kinda feel like Ralph was like that in the first movie, especially the sad part here he destroyed the car to protect her like she’s his daughter. In the first movie their relationship was adorable and charming.
In this movie it’s kinda creepy and really weird until the end and even then, vanelope goes turbo.
“The worst sequel ever made in the history of sequels!”
*”YOU DARE CHALLENGE MEGAMIND”*
dehydration gun
Lol
Ps2 graphics-ass sequel.
Rise of Papalpatine laughing in the corner
It’s just a glorified direct to dvd sequel so it doesn’t seriously count
It frustrates me how selfish Vanellope is in this movie that, despite ruling Sugar Rush for SIX YEARS and being responsible for everyone and the racers, she completely abandons them without giving them any last good-bye or explanation and it doesn't seem to faze her one bit.
Not to mention she basically turned Turbo because of selfish reasons.
Turbo was demonized for his actions in the first movie, but if you think about it, he had a good reason to do what he did, even if it evolved into wrong reasons later.
Vanellope didn't. Her arcade was successful, and to make things worse, it was because of HER specifically.
@@unapersona.831wait what good reason turbo had?
@WakerOfTheSky204 to Turbo's credit, he was jealous. Not a good reason, but Vanellope goes Turbo because she's bored...before trying anything else to try and find her spark again
@@unapersona.831 Ironically King Candy/Turbo himself was right about Vaneollpe in a way especially since she (along with Ralph) caused Sugar Rush to get unplugged and now will soon presumably cause it to be unplugged FOREVER due to her going Turbo though not for the reasons King Candy/Turbo claimed. Meaning posthumously he got the last laugh.
@GabePlaysYT granted the people in her video game treated her terribly in the first movie. Bullying her and destroying her possessions and not treating her with common human decency. They didn’t make it a very welcoming place that Vanellope would want to stay in. Also it makes sense after doing the same mundane thing day after day she would want to explore a bit.
The funny thing is, even though you tore apart this movie limb from limb, there's 1 bigger problem that further demolishes this film's existence that I didn't see mentioned. In Wreck-it Ralph, Sugar Rush was a 2-player game. In this movie, it's single player. The movie's plot literally doesn't work AT ALL unless you overwrite the past movie, as the game could very easily have 1 of its terminals closed for maintenance until it gets fixed. This retcon is the one I always point to if I come across defense of this movie, because it's the biggest part of this movie that's objectively not defendable.
I loathe this movie, and its existence is an insult to my favorite Disney movie of all time.
That actually enrages me in a way i didn't think was possible. How can anybody make a sequel to something and blatantly disregard so much established details like that. Do these people even pay attention to the intentional details and notes of the worldbuilding of the previous movie at all? Or do they watch quick clips from the trailer and decide "Yep! That's good enough knowledge to make a 2nd movie totally!"
@@sundalosketch4769 I wouldn't be surprised. We went from relatable, charming, and unique, to insulting, destructive, and completely ignorant of every good thing the original had. I wanted more from this universe, but I don't want any more sequels if we have to keep this abomination as canon. I can only hope for side stories now 🤞
I didn't realize that, that literally destroys the whole movie. Did the people who made the second even watch the first at all 🤣
BRUHHHH
@@Edwinaopt i dont think they did
Ralph didn’t INTEND to unleash the virus, but let’s remember….
Ralph didn’t INTEND to unleash the Cybugs in the first film. And yet, he was ready to give up everything, sacrifice himself, to stop the Cybugs and attempt to save his friend, and, most importantly, FIX. HIS. MISTAKES.
In this movie he does nothing yayyyyyyy
Ralph from the 2nd movie is NOT the same Ralph from the 1st movie. There’s just no way.
First movie is just a burning memory
Ralph at least didn't know what was going on. In the first movie. When it came to the cybugs.
He intentionally wanted to let loose that virus
Honestly i think ive seen movie twice but i cant remember the movie at all
Thanks you for talking about how bad Vanellope's song is. When Schaffrillas started praising it to be the only good part of the film, I was confused. "What? _This_ is the best part of the film? This horrendous song sung about going Turbo? That can't be right." And thankfully, it wasn't. Hated that song so damn much.
I love how you imply that
Cinderella breaking her glass slipper is out of character because she'd have a lot of sentimental value for the slipper, and not because- yknow- she's a lifelong abuse survivor pointing BROKEN GLASS at a CHILD.
but no, she has to be badass so people will like her, and Disney must completely change her personality from the "oh I'm a helpless damsel in distress" trope (THAT ISN'T ACTUALLY IN THE MOVIE BUT PEOPLE ACT LIKE IT WAS) to that stock feminist woman character that I can't escape no matter how fast I run
FOR REAL, I never thought of it that way 😭😭😭
I was excited to see the princesses in this film, only for them to turn into this 💀
@@Termina2018 They could have used the princesses to make a nice scene which would give everyone nostalgia but no they did not because Misandry is the only thing that makes you look cool nowadays.
Nah I loved that
It was like a bar fight but with princesses
Vanellope went Turbo, yet suffered no consequences…
One of the main rules of the first film, thrown completely out the window. 💀💀💀
That’s why I don’t think the writers rewatched the first movie. They ignored one of the most obvious elements of the first movie.
@@sonicfan9144There definitely had to have been some kind of studio interference or something considering that this movie was made by the exact same crew that made the first film
*“You’re not going Turbo are you?”* 🤨🗿
This is why I don't treat the sequel as a canon film
@@Crescentmemes2003No, it's not meant to be treated as non canon. it *isn't*
If Wreck-It Ralph was a love letter to video games, then Ralph Breaks the Internet is hate mail (or in this case, hate comment) to content creators.
I bet they think the og creators are sad about the hate comment.
My proof: Hate comments scene
blackmail
It is also supposed to represent a cautionary tale about the dangers of overly clingness despite doing it in a poorly executed way.
The funny fact that the people who keep saying that cyberbullying is so terrible and it has to be stopped
Are the same people who probably haven't made friends in primary school
I wanna see more of this "love letter/hate mail" analogy.
Just as a side note, you can both be tough and girly. These are not mutually exclusive. Toughness does not directly correlate to "tomboyishness"
Disney heard about The Emoji Movie and for some reason thought "let's do that too".
The Emoji Movie is a good movie
Well Disney "Imagineering" is just simple appropriation and plagiarism. So it makes sense that their well of American "pop-culture based" ideas, compromised by monopoly, would eventually dry up!
@@RoseQuartz692 trust me, it's not, like I'm fine if you find it good it's just taking an analysis of it you'll find that it's in fact terrible
And then Mamoru Hosoda made the best animated film of 2021 with Belle, by making a movie about the Internet. Succeeding where The Emoji Movie and Ralph Breaks the Internet failed at.
@@Mr_Gamer-Random I seen the movie twice and it it's good
Honestly the most disappointing part of the movie for me is that internet based games DO exist. They could have easily done a love letter to internet games like with arcade games instead of sites that have little to no relevance to games. This would obviously have to happen at night, like game characters meeting up in the original movie. Imagine Ralph going to a tower defense game, or Calhoun finding a MMO. It would be so much better.
Friv
A nod to Flash games could've been nice. Like Ralph and Felix finding a flash clone of their game
My boy Ralph smoking the box head zombies, it breaks my heart
Hell, they could travel from pc based online games like Fall Guys and Genshin Impact to mobile games in a movie like that. And I can also imagine there being an online games graveyard where old retired online games go, and Disney could use that to reference Club Penguin and ToonTown Online, and other online games Disney had a hand in. That would honestly be pretty neat and a nice bit of fanservice for an older audience.
@@MadameSomnambule also a nice homage to the idea that nothing on the internet ever truly gets deleted.
At least we can easily declare this movie non-canon. Ralph officially broke this movie.
Ralf Breaks His Fanbase, The Movie
Like, the above point I made is the best thing about this terrible film. If I had to give it credit for anything, it's this.
@@masterninjary2319I just hope if there's another movie, it won't acknowledge this sequel and make it better
@@Khann_2102giving it the Shrek three treatment? I like it
@@Dutchy4564 exactly my friend
I can't even imagine the rude awakening for the game devs of Slaughter Race when they discover a new character was added for some unknown reason
lol
@@Kmuecman64 Nah, I'm sorry this is not a "lol" type of moment. Because if, and for good reason too, the developers think that a tiny sugarplum princess doesn't belong in a game about gang members racing each other in a post-apocalyptic world, and decide to DELETE her... She'd freakin die 🙂
@@indofan1708ikr, even when shank puts her code in the game she would still be deleted by the game developers
That’s probably my least favorite part of this movie, how nerfed Ralph is. In the first one people were scared of him. Absolutely terrified, even king candy was afraid of Ralph. The main reason was because he was the bad guy, but they were also afraid of him for his strength and rage we’ve seen a few times. He’s basically the hulk and most people were still afraid of him even after learning he’s good. That was also the one reason people weren’t scared of him ,if they weren’t, because he was a good guy. The new characters in the internet I doubt have ever seen Ralph nor knew that he was now a good guy. You’d think they’d be afraid if a hulk came into your website or game. And why wasn’t his strength ever used in the movie?!??
Speaking of bad guys.. There's a cameo of a certain UA-camr who's become rather infamous this year. (It was when the Ralph virus clones were kicking people off the internet.) I don't wanna name her because I think we're all aware of this person & her controversies, but remembering that cameo just makes me cringe so gd much I had to acknowledge it.
@@FurKid_the_Gg_roo_99 Lemme guess, Colleen Ballinger? Honestly the only good scnee in that movie is her losing internet because Ralph's tantrum caused him to throw a billboard at her
@@eastwardnest271 Yup. Let's just say that a toxic gossip train got crashed that day - kinda literally, that being one conducted by a loser!
The worst part about Vanellope going Turbo is that by doing so she'd be getting the game shut down, the same game that she's trying to save by getting the new wheel for it, defeating the entire purpose of them going to the internet to begin with.
Exactly! That'll put Sugar Rush at risk of being unplugged permantely and mind you, there'll be ALOT OF GAMELESS/HOMELESS CHARACTERS too.
I love how in the first movie, Ralph literally almost got his game unplugged when he left it while the arcade was open, yet in this movie, he does the exact same thing again. Apparently he learned nothing from the first movie. He’s gonna get his game put out of order again.
It's even worse this time. In the first movie, Ralph left on his own, with Felix and the Nicelanders not knowing he was gone until it was too late. In this movie, he tells Felix that he's going to leave his game for a while, and rather than try to stop him, Felix just tells Ralph that he'll "cover for him" (which he should know he has no possible way of doing).
The logical thing to do would've been to have characters whose absence wouldn't be a big deal - like a background Nicelander, one of the unimportant soldiers in Hero's Duty, or a Sugar Rush racer that doesn't get picked often - to go get the wheel. But I guess then we wouldn't really have a movie
@@SamTheMarioMan I'm also talking about when Ralph went to Sugar Rush to build Vanellope a new track. He does this while the arcade is open, and this in the FIRST 10 MINUTES of the movie. And even worse, this is what causes the entire story to happen. So the entire movie happens because Ralph apparently forgot what happened in the first movie when he left his game.
@@sonicfan9144 That is true. Like, there was no reason whatsoever why Ralph couldn't have waited until after closing time to build her a new track
@@sonicfan9144 True but Vanellope is also at fault here because she stupidly wrestled control from the player just to try out this poorly made “new track” which led to the wheel breaking. Also Sugar Rush was made a single player game for no reason other then to make this stupid plot work.
@@Mario87456 Exactly. I feel like it’s just like what GamingMagic13 pointed out with Toy Story 4. In the opening flashback scene, RC is stuck in the driveway on the side of Andy’s house, but that driveway wasn’t there in the previous movies. Same situation here, they apparently forgot that Sugar Rush was a 2-player game. So now because of that one error, this movie is destroyed like the cake that Ralph smashed.
This movie isn't canon and nothing can convince me otherwise.
Yep, Ralph broke the movie.
You know with how obsessively clingy Ralph was with a little girl in this movie, maybe Ralph should have been locked up in the fungeon after all 💀
Fuck the fungeon… get the whole FBI to go down after him
lmaoo
He was trying to protect her tho
No i don't think Ralph meant it that way bestie 💀
@@PRADAMVSE I'm sure Epstein said that at one time too
I have a peculiar way of telling when a movie is going to be awful. It's when they keep promoting a single scene from the movie repeatedly. For instance, in one movie, they showcased all the Disney Princesses. Do they really think people will watch a movie just because all the Disney princesses are in it? It worked on my sister, but after watching it, she said it was terrible.
How I would fix this movie personally is make Shank the main antagonist of the movie. It would make sense to make her the villain because of how she brainwashes Vanellope to stay in Slaughter Race and abandon Sugar Rush. Vanellope tries to leave, but Shank wouldn't let her go. Ralph finds out Shank is evil and saves Vanellope from Slaughter Race. Instead of Vanellope scolding Ralph, Ralph is the one scolding Vanellope for trying to abandon Sugar Rush. It ends with Ralph and Vanellope successfully getting the steering wheel to the arcade and everything goes back to normal.
That would have been a good message on stranger danger on the internet too.
@@SonodaSymphony Yeah and a message on choosing the right friend not someone who'd be a bad influence.
This movie would work well with your revision, and simply shortening it to a short film than a full-fledged 2 hour movie.
Yeah. When I first saw this movie I was thinking Shank was going to be the main antagonist. But then she and her gang switch to very kind and cuddly rather abruptly at the end of the race, which really threw me off. Your change would've been consistent with the cannon of the earlier movie--especially not leaving your game and "going Turbo." I would add that the process of saving Venellope from Shank could've included Felix, Calhoun and even some of the Nicelanders and Sugar Rush racers. Instead, well, we get this bizarre mess of a movie, with that very weird climactic fight in the end.
YES BEAUTIFUL
C’mon let’s face it. Ralph breaks the internet was just an excuse for Disney to make a two hour commercial.
You wanna know something else that’s REALLY mind boggling? The entire reason for Ralph’s characterization in this movie is because one of the directors misunderstood ONE single line of dialogue from the first movie.
The director talks about the scene where Ralph says “If that little kid likes me, how bad can I be?” and he says that it’s a sweet sentiment, but you start to realize that it means Ralph has more growing to do. He’s defining himself based on whether or not Vanellope likes him. It doesn’t mean he’s actually learned to like himself.
And my response to that is…. This quote from the first movie would beg to differ. “There’s no one I’d rather be, than me.”
If that isn’t self acceptance, I don’t know what is.
Also, he isn’t basing his happiness solely on Vanellope liking him, he’s saying that he’s glad that at least SOMEONE appreciates him for who he is.
By the way, here is proof of what he said. ua-cam.com/video/eOwQC6DpgO8/v-deo.html
Exactly. He comes to accept himself and "take life one game at a time" and is appreciated that someone cares about him when he's been treated as a villain his whole life
Yet ANOTHER reason to hate those sellout directors I DESPISE so much as believe me you have no idea just how much I HATE them.
I absolutely hate it when people twist simple statements around like that. It's pretty obvious what Ralph meant.
I get that two people can look at the same scene and get two different interpretations out of it, but it was SO obvious what the scene was communicating, how do they miss the point of it entirely? And how do they get to work on a sequel to that movie? How has Disney not become bankrupt yet?
@@yeeyeeyeeyeI'm curious too, Disney making lots of bad movies throughout the years, is still not bankrupt yet.
Maybe because of Disneyland or something? People keep on coming there
Another nitpicky fact that I still find worth mentioning: Literally why did they not call it Ralph WRECKS The Internet? That was THE PERFECT title. It was right in front of their faces, but no, they went with the inferior title.
Hell, they even joked about this at the end of one of the trailers. Ralph and Vanellope say that 'Wrecks the internet' sounds better, and Yes agrees, proving this was a DELIBERATE CHOICE THEY MADE.
I think they went with Breaks the Internet because this movies script was first written back in 2014. Around that time, I believe the term “breaking the Internet” was somewhat big. However, it immediately outdates itself because the Internet is always changing with that’s popular or trending. Meanwhile, Ralph Wrecks the Internet works in the context of the title character and honestly rolls off the tongue better
I have a title of my own. "Wreck-It Ralph: In-2 the Winternet."
Because "breaking the internet" was a phrase already. The title is a double entendre, literal, as in the virus, and figurative, as in being really popular.
Because "Wrecks The Internet" is a canon-worthy title that shouldn't be wasted on this mess. 😅
Ralph breaks the internet is what happens when someone gets too money hungry and “hip”. I mean naming a character “Yass” cause that’s what all the “cool teens are saying these days” has got to be one of the most cringey and saddest reasons to write something.
Also, I’m praying that one of the other movies is Mulan 2. It’s a war crime to consider that movie a sequel to the original Mulan.
Are we waiting for Y'all then? :D
Surprised she didn't have a gf named "Nuuu" pfft...
If they gave Yass the full name "Yass Queen" i would become suicidal fr
But Mulan 2 is out.
I have a feeling the other 2 movies are gonna be Mulan 2 and Hunchback 2
another scene that makes NO SENSE is, again, the scene where the wheel brakes. not only is Ralph STILL in Vanellope’s game, but he’s STANDING IN FRONT OF THE SCREEN WHERE EVERYONE CAN SEE HIM WHEN MR LITWAK IS STANDING RIGHT THERE!!! the stupidity is just mind boggling 😭💀
Hey can you tell the background song in 27:08 pls
@@anto_ytb4123 Going off of memory, I think its something like Overthere Stair from Super Paper Mario, hope that helps! ^-^
It’s like Q*bert in the previous movie all over again, at the very least Q*bert in the previous movie makes somewhat sense
@@pogggaming4470 yeah that’s true, but ig Q*Bert’s game had already been unplugged so he didn’t think much about any consequences since he probably just wanted to go somewhere other than the Plug. also, he was still being careful and staying completely off screen, and if i remember correctly came to warn Felix about Ralph the first time
@@ravelterthetraveler could you identify the songs that play at 10:02 and 19:20 please? Thanks in advance.
ralphs obsesiveness for vanellope is even more creepy when you consider the fact that ralph is in his 30's and vanellope is not even double didgets in age :/
🤮🤢
Ew
That too. She was his first and only friend, so I kinda understand why he was upset, but the obsessiveness they gave him WAS unnecessary
UUUUUUOOOOOHHHHHH 😭
Where’s Chris Hansen when you need him…
I hate the "Do people always assume your problems got solved because a big strong man showed up?" The men who saved the girls in those movies didn't do it to proof they were strong and everything would be okay with them. They did it because they loved them. They were willing to risk their lives to make sure they were okay just as the princesses were too.
I'm also noticing a trend in Disney movies Vanellope left Sugar Rush. Woody left the Bonnie and the gang. Elsa left Arendelle. Disney seems to be saying abandoning your family is okay. I know sometimes people have to spilt apart; that's a part of life. But these characters do it for selfish desires. Remember how hard Vanellope tried to be accepted into the lineup? Remember how Woody used to say there's nothing more important than being played by a kid? Remember how Elsa had to wait 13 years to be Annas sister again? I guess current year Disney doesn't care.
I thought Elsa 2 wasn't bad. I don't think it's amazing either. I liked the scenery but i hated how she left her sister.
but they are not talking about the men that saved them, they're talking people around. fairytales usually end up with a marriage as if it's the ending point, but it's. problems don't vanish simply because you found someone special. but they are not talking about the men that saved them, they're talking about what do other people think of them. fairytales usually end up with a marriage as if it's the ending point, but it's. problems don't vanish simply because you found someone special.
@София Хантер some of the princesses saying that made no sense. Either because their problems actually WERE solved by a man, or because it's very common knowledge the problems WERENT and only a small minority would think they were. Like Tiana, Moana, Mulan, Elsa and Anna, Meredith, characters who LITERALLY save themselves in the end
Id like to mention that if your family/friends love you and you can stay for a bit longer than needed, you should. I’m literally able to go to college just bc my parents care abt me and I dont have any reason to hate them. I couldn’t imagine just moving 5 states away bc of some whim convincing me it’s a good idea.
To suggest that you should leave a perfectly ok family or situation bc “new adventures await” is so toxic and kinda gives a bad message to kids. Stability & a home to go to is one of the best things you can have in this life if you have it already. That’s not to say to stay if your current situation is toxic just that… if you’re doing ok don’t just fcking leave on a whim. And god. Imagine adults doing that to their children.
The woody thing doesn’t even matter anymore because they are making a Toy Story 5 meaning they are just going to somehow manage to mess that up
the only thing that aged well is Ralph wrecking Colleen Ballinger’s Internet connection
REAL
He's both the unintentional villain and the unsung hero.
I hope the writers recreate the pointless story arc towards Ralph’s overly clinginess towards Vanelope in Ralph Breaks the Internet by having in Zootopia 2 Nick and Judy becoming tempted with leaving the ZPD and their positions as police officers and heroes in Zootopia and become spies and secret agents and heroes alongside Jack Savage and Kyke and honey badger in this spy and detective agency in the city of Extropolis “Super Life Spies” and have Gazelle, Chief Bogo and Clawhauser appear as an overprotective mother and father or uncle towards Nick and Judy and hero antagontists instead of overly clingy best friends.
If the WI-FI router were an arranged marriage kind of arcade video game like Wreck-It-Ralph assumed when he failed to understand the word WI-FI due to his stupidity and unable to understand basic English (Also calling Ebay EBoy and Google Goggles and when you thought Judy Hopps was an idiot man-child and Nick Wilde was an anti-hero and jerk initially, Ralph is an even bigger idiot/man-child and Maui from Moana till the end was a much bigger anti-hero and jerk himself.) or if one were plugged into LipWak’s Arcade after the events of Ralph Breaks the Internet, Wreck-It-Ralph and Princess Vanelope and the Disney Princesses would grab the netizen Nick Wilde and Judy Hopps and netizen Gazelle and Clawhauser from Oh My Disney and use the arranged marriage game to pair them together and get married as couples as Did du fans wished and hoped and have red fox cub, gray rabbit, Thomson’s gazelle foal, cheetah cub and fox and rabbit hybrid kids to raise, that would be an interesting fanfiction idea or have Nick and Judy and Gazelle and Clawhauser become married couples and have kids to raise as mentioned in Zootopia 2 and have the third Wreck-It-Ralph movie be about Nintendo Switch and PlayStation Five and WII-U video games (Like Minecraft, Super Mario 3D World and Bowser’s Fury, Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze,) and the main characters visiting them from LitWak's Arcade or them visiting apps on IPads and iPhones and emojis like in The Emoji Movie but in a better executed way like the mid-credits scene to Ralph Breaks the Internet with Bunny Pancake and Kitty Milkshake app.
Saved the kids
The scene where Vanellope desperately begs kaiju Ralph to stop rampaging by dropping her dreams was frighteningly similar to what it looks like dealing with a toxic relationship was... uncomfortable. If that was explored sensitively, sure, but omg it wasn't.
If you had noticed that Sugar Rush is a single seat instead of a two seater and the Nicelanders building has a different design. Also the layout of the arcade is also different. It's like no one saw the first movie.
It would be fun if we took these details as evidence that the movie takes place in an alternate universe. I'd personally like to believe that it's not canon lol.
@@mariak5096 Absolutely because this movie doesn't exist
@@anastasia_852there is no Ralph Breaks the Internet in Ba Sing Se
The first Wreck it Ralph was better because there was so much conflict:
1. Ralph wanted to win a medal but was told bad guys don't win medals so he jumped into another game to do it
2. Fix it Felix tried to bring Ralph back to his game before it went out of order
3. The danger of dying outside your own game makes you dead forever
4. Calhoun trying to destroy all the cybugs before they take over every game in the arcade
5. Vanellope wanting to race in Sugar Rush but she was told she couldn't because she was a glitch
6. King Candy/Turbo Time wanting to become the most popular video game character.
This one has only one conflict: buy a new wheel controller for Sugar Rush.
Y'know...Wreck-It Ralph proves something that I love. "A villain without a hero is successful. A hero without a villain is pointless"
The game might be named after Felix, but Ralph is the most important piece as he can't fix what isn't broken
I've been thinking that wreck it Ralph sucks when it gets a sequel
@@lordhellstrande2763u r right which is also a negitive for Ralf breaks the internet as there is no villain in the tippical sense as the only villains which are not relly villains just antaginests are the main charicters, mindless viruss 2 that makes thing from insercurities and money.
@@Me.917 Yeah the Ralph clones are just the Cy-bugs again but lame and without an actual antagonist taking control of them like Turbo did.
The Cy-bug invasion also was actually set-up early in the movie instead of thrown in randomly near the end.
One big thing worth noting is that Felix and Calhoun's plot wasn't intended to be scrapped, and in some early drafts they appear to have come along to the internet either with the racers or just with Ralph and Vanellope from the beginning - we were supposed to get a found-family sort of adventure with the Core Four (as the four main protagonists are called by fans). The art book for RBTI has storyboards and color keys of this, and various visdev artists have posted about it (not sure if I can link all this and the below since my comments always get deleted when I do that, but it's fairly easy to find).
Given that director Rich Moore left Disney a few months after RBTI came out and he expressed a desire for creative freedom, it seems that the movie's actual crew wasn't really to blame for this, since it looks like a case of micromanagement by Disney. Especially given the forced cameos of characters so unfitting to this setting that *virtual avatars* had to be used in-universe - producer Clark Spencer confirmed in an interview that's what the princesses are here, since the actual princesses wouldn't be real people in the WIR world (and there's a movie guidebook for kids that repeats this info).
Even in the "foster the racers until Ralph returns" plot, we were supposed to see their entire story onscreen instead of it being cut last minute (so late that there's even merchandise like coloring books and stuff featuring a scene of Felix and Calhoun having dinner with the racers) and turned into overused parenting jokes.
It's really damn sad as that half of the main cast had their entire plot scrapped and ended up with less screentime than irrelevant cameos, but it's also sad that these characters were reduced to "herpderp they have to have the Caring For Kids plot since they're a married couple" like it's the 1950s or something. Wreck-It Ralph's epilogue and ending makes Ralph, Vanellope, Felix, and Calhoun a found family yet we see none of that in RBTI. There's just so much wasted potential (this could've been like a Toy Story series with all the creative stuff the crew came up with), and "wasted potential" pretty much sums up all of the issues with how RBTI was handled by Disney.
You mentioning how the princesses were supposed to be author avatars makes sense. Their behaviour is closer to how people interpret the characters online than how they really were in canon. It makes sense that they would make jokes about being kidnapped or relying on men if they were created or controlled by people whose only exposure to the princesses was through internet jokes made during the early-to-mid 2010's.
Edit: I meant virtual avatars
It's one of those movies that it didn't need a sequel, also Toy Story 4 ruined a perfect trilogy because it didn't need to exist.
Finally, someone else who couldn’t stand the princess scene! There’s a lot I could say about how much potential was missed, but can I just point out how ironic it is that Disney claims to be woke and progressive yet they didn’t give Tiana her original, darker skin tone until after they got a bunch of backlash?
They don't give a crap about Social Progress unless if it rakes in the cash.
@@goiabexp Let’s hope the current CEO can fix the mistakes of the previous one.
@@avalasialove they won't and the last one got the position back
Wait what do you mean they gave her back her skin tone? Did they edit the skin tone and re-rended the entire film for digital release similar to the apartment scene in Incredibles 2 (the fight scene with Elastigirl and the fake Screensaver in that room inside the pizza delivery guys apartment)
@@Mr_Gamer-Random I don’t know how they did it. All I know is that her skin tone in the trailers was lighter and that caused a huge uproar. Then her skin turned out darker in the final product.
I just pretend this movie doesn't exist honestly. That's how bad it is.
The first Wreck it Ralph is a timeless new classic for Disney. Ralph Breaks the Internet feels completely dated.
I have tried myself but I just cannot since I have a huge burning hatred for it as well as a burning hatred for the directors Bitch Moore and Dildo Johnston even to this very day even after several years have past which just goes to show just how bad it really is. It was so bad in fact in fact that it utterly and irreconcilably DESTROYED any enjoyment I got out of the original movie. I have VOWED to NEVER watch the film EVER again and I have not ever since my first and only time watching it 2018.
If that's the case, then...
The Earth King has invited you to Lake Laogai
Kinda funny since video games get just as dated but still endure. Well, the really good ones anyway.
@@maynot I am not even a fan of that show and even I was disgusted and horrified by how it ended and I can also remember the day where out of curiosity I looked up the show’s finale after finding out the show ended and needless to say I was utterly horrified and disturbed when I read the whole plot synopsis considering that Star essentially committed GENOCIDE and she is is supposed to be the HERO.
@@maynot hi there mate
So yeah, i am still a fan of SVTFOE, drawing fanarts of it even
You can call me a loyal knight of the show lol, as i like all of it no matter what, and nothing changes my mind
As for why i am still a fan of a so called trainwreck of a show... sorry, no elaboration
I'm glad you addressed how selfish Vanellope was, and how she went Turbo without the movie addressing it. That really pissed me off because in a GOOD movie they would have addressed it. She never even tells anyone other than Ralph and she only told him because he forced the issue. And the movie paints him as 100% in the wrong.
Normally your protagonist learns what a selfish asshole they've been and they take steps to correct it. Not Vanellope. She actually gets more selfish after the end of the 1st movie. Remember Elsa? Or Simba? How they run away from their royal obligations and learn they have a duty to their people. Yeah that never happens for Vanellope.
Frozen 2 then went and ruined that part of Elsa too
@@silverscorpio24 Yeah, but then Elsa has always been a pretty trash Disney Princess/Queen. Always running away and leaving Anna for dead.
Vanelope is not a Princess she's a President! Otherwise completely right
@@bumblingbureaucrat6110 Vanellope being a Princess is pivotal to the plot of the sequel.
@PlanetZoidstar Come on bro, did you even watch the first movie? She changed her title to President.
The only good scene is when Ralph accidentally disconnects Colleen Ballinger.
The commentary on Belle being "kidnapped and enslaved" is so inaccurate. In Beauty and the Beast Belle see's her father in danger (I think? Something that makes her need to go back home) on the magic mirror and leaves the castle with the consent and knowledge of the Beast who allows her to leave knowing she must save her father. It is then when she is attacked by wolves on her horse in the woods that the Beast saves her, lying on the ground hurt from injuries. She at then point could have abandoned the Beast and continue home, but she /chooses/ to go back and save him and nurse his wounds due to being grateful for him saving her and letting her leave. So no I agree I don't think she was not really kidnapped or enslaved!
People always had this misconception that Belle was kidnapped and her story was Stockholm Syndrome.
Ooh I never even caught that during my watch through of Ralph "Breaks" the Internet. But yeah they did Belle dirty.
You actually only have one sequence of events that’s incorrect.
Belle didn’t leave the castle the first time because she saw her father in the mirror (this happens long after she brings Beast back to heal him), she left because she entered the west wing and nearly touched the rose, which caused Beast to freak out and scare her off.
The rest of your sequence of events is accurate.
Then people do Belle dirty especially considering that she is probably one of the smartest "princesses" in general probably only challenged by the badass Mulan
@@TetsuRiken They do all the princesses dirty because of popular misconceptions. It's why they get live action remakes that's supposed to "correct" the animated films
Vanellope leaving Sugar Rush for Slaughter Race at the end reminds me of when Woody left Bonnie for Bo Peep at the end of Toy Story 4. It didn't bother me on first viewing, but after having it explained to me through a UA-cam analysis video similar to this (actually a series by UA-camr GamingMagic13), I completely understand why that was the wrong direction to take and how it completely goes against not only the character's role in society but also what they stand for.
Really? Woody leaving never actually bothered me, it actually made sense for me!
However there's something I still can't stand... Bonnie is such an annoying kid in this movie and they try to justify her actions as if kids can't appreciate something being gifted to them as "important"
But that might be just me
I was going to guess toy story 4 for the other of his worst trilogy. Woody didn’t just leave Bonnie, he left everyone and went against his entire character for three films.
EXACTLY!!! It didn't sit right with me, she could've just make her our game of how she likes it, then just leaving it.
I actually despise GamingMagic’s 6+ hour analysis on TS4 because its literally a load of bullshit that’s honestly tiresome to watch. Like I get it, your entitled to your own opinion and everything… but are you seriously going to dig so low to literally hate a Pixar movie for 6 hours?
Go outside and touch fucking grass
And on top of that, let me just explain things clearly. Ralph Breaks the Internet began this trend where at the end of a movie, the main character splits apart and goes on their own and I honestly really hate it just like Twist villains.
In the case of TS4, at least it was justifiable because Woody was still selfless for others and his friends understood that while he cared for them… he should be out there and not collecting dust in Bonnie’s closet. Woody wasn’t being PLAYED with in TS4 that THAT’S why he left the group. He didn’t choose to leave because he wanted to be with Bo, or he was being “selfish”. He left because he wanted to help other lost toys become found and his purpose of being played with by Bonnie was over.
In Ralph Breaks the Internet, Vanellope leaving Ralph is at least okay but it still doesn’t make a ton of sense considering she’s still going turbo and I’m pretty sure the Sugar Rush game would be misprogramed/others would notice her disappearance and call the game broken. Also let’s not forget about the fact that if Vanellope dies, she perma dies since she was never programmed to be in Slaughter Race in the first place but the movie never acknowledges this once.
This is the problem with UA-cam criticisms and these dumb, overdramatic, long “analysis” videos where a person’s ego will literally manipulate their audience, and others will take their word as “fact” without even watching or examining the film themselves. Its sad to see people who honestly call certain films “bad” simply because of another youtuber that manipulates scenes and viewpoints just to prove that their ego and opinions are “correct” ffs
@@cloudshines812 Yeah, but the problem is Woody already had that crisis in Toy Story 1 and 2. Buzz shows up and Woody isn't being played with and he has to come to terms with the fact that it doesn't matter, it is still his 'duty' as a toy to be there whenever Andy needs him. In TS2, that's when you get the semi-selfish choice of being part of the roundup gang because he thought he wasn't wanted by Andy. Even Jessie's story says this. The purpose of a toy is to be loved by a child. TS4 goes against this by having the 'man' who literally says this in multiple movies go against his ethos and never be loved by a child again, on top of abandoning his friends. I haven't watched GamingMagic's video. But TS4 and RBtI gave me extremely similar vibes. Out of all the Pixar films, those two are the ones I avoid. I even like Onward better than these two.
You know, anytime someone calls attention to the breaking of gender roles it ultimately undermines the concept of gender equality by implying that this is an exception and not the status quo.
Didn't Knuckes say that
@@captaincaspian42yes
Sonic Boom reference
They weren't calling attention to the breaking of gender roles. They were calling attention to a gender role that was BARELY EVEN PRESENT IN THEIR MOVIES.
Thanks Knuckles. Just because you're a meathead doesn't mean you're not a feminist.
My favourite part was when Ralph said “It wrecking time” before wrecking all over them
Ralph 1 movie: Learns to accept himself, learns his worth, makes awesome friend, makes up with everybody from his game, has friends in every abandoned character, giving them purpose in his own game, becomes mentor for the whole group of "villains"
Ralph 2 movie: eboy?
Vanellope 1 movie: Her life is destroyed by Turbo, appreciates having her own place with pieces of paper from candy, barely hoping for something more, gets more, beats everyone, becomes princess, forgives and becomes no.1 of her own game and is happy
Vanellope 2 movie: Being a princess and best character of my own game? Nah, I want to go Turbo never speaking to my old friends and dumping and treating Ralph like trash, not listening to him at all seeing only bad things from what he does or says
And it's seen AS GOOD THAT RALPH LETS HER GO TURBO?
I know, right? It’s like this:
First movie
Ralph temporarily leaves his game to get a medal.
Everyone else: Oh no! Ralph’s gone Turbo! 😱
Second movie
Vanellope permanently leaves her own game to live in Slaughter Race
Everyone else: Just sips coffee like nothing bad is happening.
How are these two movies written by the same person?
@sonicfan9144 I don't know how they could even think of this! You'd think Vanellope would be slightly, or even horribly traumatized from everything that happened. Turbo shunned her, made her out to be someone, or in this case, something bad (he doesn't even call her by her actual name until he manipulates Ralph), and even tried KILLING her! You would think Vanellope would be traumatized and realize quickly that what she's doing is wrong, and you'd also think the same would go for Ralph, considering Turbo manipulated him and probably saw him as a friend at one point considering both of their games were next to each other, and wouldn't want Vanellope to go down the same path Turbo selfishly took! Turbo even did some of this under a different name and alias. I hate the sequel so much.
Seriously though and you can't forget vanellope 2 movie: I worked so hard to accomplish my dreams and goals of finally becoming a racer and discovering who I am.....
REMEMBER HOW MUCH I WANTED THAT ?
WELL NOW FORGET THAT I'M GOING TO ABANDON MY GAME AND NOT THINK ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE I'M LEAVING AND IF THIS COULD PUT MY GAME IN DANGER !
My theory is that Turbo infiltrated Disney, then wrote this movie as propaganda, it's all just how he views it, Vanellope is the one doing Turbo, and Ralph is a brainless monster who's only good at finding Vanellope
Now that you mention it it really does seem in character for someone like Turbo to make the film like this as it fits into his personality perfectly.
I read this and thought you meant the DreamWorks snail for a moment before you meant the villain from the first movie.
@@Mario87456 MARIO number 1
That would be a pretty clever plot twist for this movie. Feels like it was originally meant to be like this until the last minute when it was force scrapped.
TURBOTASTIC!
One thing I wished you'd addressed was how - Shank just effortlessly codes Vanellope into Slaughter Race OFFSCREEN.
One of the major sources of drama in the 1st movie was the whole "if you die outside your game, you don't come back" thing. Yet Shank just...Codes Vanellope into the game easily. Why didn't Turbo do that? Just code himself into Sugar Rush. He was able to overwrite his entire persona, why couldn't he code himself into the game? Did he really never once consider he might die inside the game by crashing or something?
Notice how Turbo goes conveniently unmentioned throughout this entire movie. It's almost as if the writers knew about the whole "Going Turbo" aspect of the first film and strictly avoided bringing it up just so they could justify Vanellope not only going "Turbo" herself, but somehow getting that entire aspect of this game's world undone by the power of contrived "coding."
If they could just code Turbo into Sugar Rush, then the entire premise of the first film falls apart and retroactively makes the first movie bad now too. Fuck RBTI.
@@jmaster4941 This.
Turbo DID code himself into Sugar Rush-in the scene where he enters the game code, there's this massive block for King Candy that obviously isn't supposed to be there. It's so janky and forced in that it falls apart when he engages in fisticuffs with Vanellope. So like... we're just supposed to believe that Shank is better at programming than Turbo was...?
@@petfriendamy Which shows how bad the writing in the sequel was. That Turbo went to all that trouble and it still was not enough to code himself into the game in a way that he would respawn after death.
@@jmaster4941 Not to mention disturbingly King Candy/Turbo posthumously got the last laugh since Vanellope ended up being no better then him with the only difference being that he was punished for it while she was not which is just INFURIATING.
Ralph goes Turbo: Panik
Vanellope goes Turbo: Kalm
There are so many issues with this movie, but if they absolutely had to get Sugar Rush unplugged then Ralph (whose game is *at least* 30 years old) would absolutely be familiar with the situation of other games getting unplugged. In the first movie, sure he was goofy, but he had pretty great emotional intelligence. When he’s talking to Felix at the beginning of the first movie he lies to him about not recognizing fireworks because he doesn’t want to outright confront him, he wants to give Felix a chance to include him in the festivities. Someone who can do *that* could absolutely recognize the severity and emotional turmoil that comes with a game getting unplugged.
GOD what about how he acted with Quibert????????? He has seen 30 years of games getting unplugged!!!! God I hate how aggressive this movie is in ruining the characters it’s just so bad
You know what's really hilarious about this movie? You know it's bad when there's another better movie older than this one (Shrek Forever After) that touchs on this concept in a more mature way. Sometimes, realizing what you have before it's gone is not a bad idea and I don't understand why this movie goes against its own game arcade rules to do that... makes no sense whatsoever. DreamWorks got the upper hand on this one...
I don't think the idiots that made this movie watched the first one at all to know anything about what happened before.
Shrek Forever After is just a Shrek fanfic of It's a Wonderful Life tho. Not saying it's a bad movie, I love that Shrek movie. But the writers literally took the plot of It's a Wonderful Life.
@@rosestar1324 it's interesting how two movies shares the same reception before
@@rosestar1324Still a better film than...whatever the hell Shrek the Third was.
Damn that was a good movie
It’s best to pretend this “movie” is just a fanfic written by a pretentious high school student who only read the Wikipedia plot of the first movie…
Honestly, I argue that they could write a better movie than this- assuming they did read the Wikipedia plot of the first, which the writers of this one clearly didn’t.
It was the same writers (minus Jennifer Lee, who by her own account signed on late to WIR and didn't really write much for it compared to Phil Johnston) the crew wasn't the problem. If you look at the unused concepts there's tons of creative stuff (hell, Felix and Calhoun were supposed to always have a plot even in the final draft, but it was cut extremely late).
The issue was Disney turning the movie into a Disney IP and internet commercial at the expense of the actual cast and story. This is likely why Rich Moore left Disney just a few months after RBTI came out.
If you want a better sequel, I recommend the stories "Wreck-It Ralph 2" by jbwarner86 (FanFiction) and "Love Bug" by MotorChickenSmile (deviantart). Both are excellent WIR sequels, and the former was written specifically to fix RBTI.
@@fishdude2954 What the hell were they thinking when they allowed this garbage to be made?
Clearly you've never read fic by highschoolers who do wiki research. They are MONSTERS with the bare minimum if they like the look of the characters enough😭
Its very generous to assume they even looked at the Wiki page
I was always annoyed that ebay doesn't even work that way at all, you aren't forced to buy items at whatever max bid you put. It'd only be 2.5 or 5 over the max opposing bid... that amount would have actually made more sense with this plot too.
I remember watching this with my mom, and I found Ralph's obsessive behavior creepy... in the 1st show, he was an annoyed older brother, but now he's a parasitic, stupid, possessive, manipulative, and even predatory guy... I told mom that right off the bat, I hated the sequel she, of course, didn't understand or wanted to understand...
Sad they ruined good characters...
bro acts like a genshin fan in this movie 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Yeah I fucking hate how they dumbed down his character from a clever and respectable guy to an immature and stupid idiot to make all the female characters look smarter and "stronger" or some shit like that. His entire identity from the first movie ignored and devolved into essentially a pedophile doofus.
@@TruxySSJ 🤣🤣
I'm sorry your mother doesn't listen to you. What you think is valid and is really intelligent.
THATS WHAT I BEEN SAYINGGG my mom says im overthinking it like um no😭😭
Rapunzel: Do people always assume your problems got solved because a big strong man showed up?
Me, who, at the tender age of thirteen, gained an earth-shattering new perspective on what loving someone really means when I first watched the raw, unbridled SELFLESSNESS both Eugene and Rapunzel display in the final act of Tangled: GURL, I WILL SLAP YOU THROUGH MY COMPUTER MONITOR
On a more serious note, Wreck-it-Ralph is easily in my top ten Disney films. It's a loving homage to gaming that never sacrifices its well-told story and great characters for the sake of cheap references. And the core of the story, being about two outcasts finding each other and becoming friends, is such a universally appealing concept that even people who've never so much as touched a game of any kind can still genuinely enjoy the movie. Going from that to....whatever the heck Ralph Breaks the Internet was is one of the biggest cases of tonal whiplash I think I've ever experienced. So I loved hearing you pick it apart in the way it truly deserves. Also thought I should mention I love your choice in music for all these videos. ✨
thank YOU! that line is just insulting
13?
Damn I'm old.😂
Having someone come to your rescue because they care about you? How dare they.
Bruh disagree
@@1SpicyMeataball how dare they call that trope out
The only enjoyable aspect for me in this movie was the Sonic cameo. I would say seeing the Disney Princess's in 3D was also kind of cool but they essentially got rid of all of the Princess's flaws!
Rapunzel had a slight over bite in her movie, in THIS movie they completely changed her head shape so that her over bite was gone. Snowhite and Cinderella both had small but beautiful eyes in their own movies, her there eyes are HUGE to match the "modern Disney artsyle". And they straight up gave Tiana a new skin tone! Cause hey, remember when Tiana was dark and had jet black hair? In this movie they made her skin 10x lighter and gave her brown hair....unbelievable.
Edit: Another thing I forgot to mention was the Snowhite and Cinderella both had wider waists than the average Disney Princess as of today. Animation was 10x harder back then and bigger shapes were easier to animate. So when animation upgraded they started to give the Princess's smaller waists and arms. In this movie they have the same body shape as the other Princesses!!
That's because they're not the actual princesses cameo-ing in the flesh in this movie, since they're not real people in this universe. Those are virtual avatars of the princesses that a website spits out when someone takes a "Which Princess Are You?" quiz, so they only have a few personality traits. Clark Spencer mentioned this in an interview (not sure if I can link without getting a Spam flag) and there's a physical guidebook to the movie that also mentions it.
It's really a testament to how Disney wanted to cram their own properties where they didn't belong to the point of reaching this far, and then giving them more screentime than Felix and Calhoun, 2/4 of the main cast
@@fishdude2954 That still doesn’t explain why they made Tiana’s skin lighter.
You forgot to mention Pocahontas she looks like a completely different person.
Yesssss.
The 2D princesses who were "three dimensionalized" were so aesthetically off-putting, I scowled and winced when I watched for the first time. Cinderella, Pocahontas, Mulan, Belle, and Snow White just...ugh, they got did SO DIRTY.
@Andromeda14161
All the more reasons why I have been favoring DreamWorks for their art direction over Disney. I understand that Disney has a certain "brand" that they want to keep going but DreamWorks doesn't have a brand, and because of that I have a lot more respect for them than I do for any other animation studio because they're more open to taking risks.
In the trolls world everything looks like it was made from arts and crafts, in HTTYD everything looks rough and misshapen and they aren't afraid of making their dragons as terrifying as possible if necessary.
Almost no DreamWorks movie looks like it can be in the same universe which gives all of their movies such a fresh look. Yet even so many years later Disney STILL can't help but use the same style for every movie since Repunzel and it's getting super repetitive and boring.
Seeing Pocahontas, Snowhite, Cinderella, Belle, and Mulan with these enormous eyes and be in the "modern" Disney artsyle made them look so incredibly off
It feels weird that a little girl and grown man are best friends and he’s obsessed over her.. it feels wrong 🤮
Bruh they’re video game characters that were just coded that way, but it still doesn’t fit right
@@EdenLovesDragonsForSomeReason Vanellope is canonically 9
Disney also having the audacity to be like “DOeS EverYonE AssUme YoUr ProBlEms Are SolVed By a MaN?” When they were literally the company that perpetuated that trope in first place??
Like why is Aurora agreeing in that scene? She would be dead if her boyfriend didn’t slay a literal dragon for her??? In her case, nobody is “assuming” anything, that is exactly what happened.
@quetzalpacheco Maleficent’s backstory in a nutshell:
(Let’s be real, they gave her the stupidest backstory ever. I could’ve come up with a better one)
Tbh, the prince rarely did the saving. He usually had no character, rarely had a name and kinda showed up as a prize after the story was over. I mean, Snow White was saved by dwarves, Cinderella was saved by mice. Technically Phillip slew a dragon, but that was after he was rescued by the fairies.
Why did the girl from brave agree?
@@amberg3893 Imo that just makes the quote even more baffling. Like, most people who watched these movies know how the problem is resolved. In some movies, it really IS the efforts of the prince which save the princess, such as in Aladdin or The Little Mermaid, and so to discredit their heroic deeds is extremely disingenuous. In some, it's another outside force, like in the movies you mentioned. Sometimes it's the princess herself, such as in Mulan. And in some, it's BOTH of their efforts that resolve the overarching conflict, which is the case with Tangled, WHICH RAPUNZEL IS THE PRINCESS FROM. Not only is the line itself just bizarre to include, but to have Rapunzel say it is absolutely insulting to the original movie. Nobody who watched the movie thought Eugene was the one to solve all the conflict; it's blatantly clear that it was a result of both characters working together.
The line should not have been included at all since it not only adds nothing of substance to the movie, but acts as an insult to nearly every single old Disney princess movie.
You can't really blame Disney.
That's just how they were back then.
Honestly their movies from back then are better because they are not preaching about politics and gender shit in your face 24/7
The idea for a Wreck-It-Ralph sequel had so much potential, but they somehow managed to f*ck it up THIS BADLY.
@thebottomtext With the franchise now RUINED beyond repair I do wish somebody could do a film inspired by Wreck It Ralph that is also set in the arcade with lots of cameos from real video game characters but sadly that will likely never happen since Disney will likely sue any film merely inspired by it not to mention the cancer known as wokeness has infected film companies.
@@Mario87456 mabe Disny will retcon Ralph breaks the internet out of existance and try to make a good sequel and hire a good director that can put the franchise back on track.
@@Me.917 that would be AMAZING, but we all know that’s never happening. the best we can do is consider this sequel not-canon.
feels like this movie was made just for disney to flex how much they know about the things that “hip teens” are into
@@skeleton819 as a teenager, most of the things they showed on the internet was NOT interesting to me
I’ve heard a couple of people defend Vanellope’s actions by bringing up the way she was treated in the first movie. “Even after her code restored and the Sugar Rush racers apologizing and accepting her again, that doesn’t erase the past trauma of being bullied and ostracized by them” or something along those lines, and as a result they find her leaving for another game valid.
Well, see, if that was what Disney was going for, they would’ve AT LEAST implied the idea that Vanellope wanted to leave behind Sugar Rush because of the reminder of said trauma, then maybe it would have been A LITTLE MORE understandable. But no, the writers left it simply at her being bored. It’s clear they didn’t think beyond this reasoning for Vanellope leaving, which is unsurprising considering they didn’t think other things through like Felix “covering” for Ralph during the arcade’s open hours, or how Vanellope will literally get terminated from Slaughter Race in the next server patch when the devs randomly see a character that’s not supposed to be there.
V bird was ass to Ralph for being concerned
They did all that work just for her to hope in a whole new game
She wanted to race the whole time in first movie and once she can do it she gets bored and jumps out of a racing game to hop back into a racing game
Not to mention Vanellope was mocking the other racers during the first 10 minutes. If she was still affected from trauma, she wouldn’t have acted like a jerk to everyone else
@@t1mburt0nsdandruffI know I'm kinda late, but tbh you're right.
Maybe Vanellope being upset at losing a race because she could be mocked*, but everyone else is completely casual and not even rubbing it in her face could be a good example of this.
* Maybe for the fun of it, she lost in an incredibly stupid way
13:49 Actually, there is one good thing about this scene.
The sign Ralph threw destroyed Miranda Sings’ internet, thus saving kids from encountering her.
Ralph was a jerk in this movie. Not only did he let a horrible virus who killed a millions of innocents characters AND almost killed Vaneloppe too but he never felt guilty. Also, he didn't think about telling his plan to Felix or checking how he is. That was so selfish! Ralph only tough about what he wants, not what Vaneloppe wants. She wasn't nice too. The kid literally abandoned all the players who liked her AND her duties as the princess of Sugar rush. All that is useless to her unlike a stranger she met during a few minutes. The kid knows nothing about Shanks except that she looks cool and have a fancy car; that's it! So one of the message is it's fint to run from your responsabilities to stay with a stranger? Wrong! This is selfish and cruel, what a villain would do not a heroine 😠😤The writers really didn't understand thoses two characters!
And since she DID NOT KNOW that the steering wheel had been procured yet, she was essentially abandoning her subjects to their sorry fate.
@@kevinlee7678 It really did ruin Vanellope's character for me. Literally the whole point of her arc in the first film was to be accepted by the other racers and find her place as a character Sugar Rush. Then the 2nd film just completely shat on it by having her say "yeeeahhh screw this noise I'm leaving"..like what was the point of making her a princess then?
She went Turbo like what Turbo did in the last one and this movie did not make sense compared to the first movie set up, what are the writers thinking?!?! Did they watched the first movie or forgot about it and only remembered certain scenes, also only way to redeem this if they make a sequel that Venelope went Turbo and finds out a bit of Turbo's code leaked into her code at some point at the end of the first one as a way for Turbo to save himself from deletion and probably that wasn't the first time he did it because he may have done it to the King by overwriting the code of that guy to become one and save himself from such, that's the only way to explain this if a third movie happens, also Ralph learns this and have to save Venelope before she gets overwritten and deleted forever, so yeah
This movie made me hate Vanellope's character as a whole. I disliked the fact that Vanellope was entirely willing to let her world die just because ooooh videogame cool im staying here. My biggest gripe with this movie is that Vanellope's doing EXACTLY what the first movie told us NOT to do.
@@bradwhite5884 Don’t give them any ideas please since as bad as Ralph Breaks The Internet was they could still do a lot WORSE in a third movie and I would rather not see that happen.
What really threw me off was the hypocrisy on going turbo between Ralph and Vanellope. When Ralph did it, it was seen as an unholy horrendous thing. But when Vanellope did it and abandoned her game nobody batted an eyelash. Wasn't the whole point of her arc in the first movie was to be seen as an actual legit character in her game and be respected by the other kids in sugar rush?
Posthumously King Candy/Turbo got the last laugh at Vanellope ended up being no better then him but instead of getting punished for it she gets REWARDED for it which is just INFURIATING!!!
The FIRST Wreck it Ralph movie will always and forever be a cinematic masterpiece 😌 Unlike whatever the hell they were going for with Wreck it Ralph 2: Ralph Breaks the Internet... 😒
Wreck it Ralph 2 is also a masterpiece
@@PussInBootsTheLastWishFan2003 from a certain POV everything can be considered a masterpiece
@@PussInBootsTheLastWishFan2003 That's your opinion, may look good does not automatically make it a masterpiece, there has to be a good story and so much more to be considered good for it to be a masterpiece, but this movie undermines the first one, so yeah
@@bradwhite5884 it may not be a masterpiece to you but to a lot of people it is.
@@PussInBootsTheLastWishFan2003 ARE. YOU. FUCKING. HIGH!? That movie is objectively terrible end of story.
Another point that bothers me. The messaging being "dont become clingy and insecure" does not show how to deal with the feelings of insecurity and need to be clingy in the first place. All it tells someone going through this is "stop rn and if you don't know how other than by self-destructing and leavinc everyone close to you, then you're an even worse person than you thought!"
The first time I watched this movie, I left the theater with a bad taste in my mouth. Ralph’s behavior was so creepy, and super clingy. The first movie was all about the consequences of going turbo, only to have Vanellope go turbo. It was like watching a movie with totally different characters.
I know I commented a while back but there's one more thing. Disney, STOP RUINING YOUR PRINCESS CHARACTERS. They had well established personalities and still were important to their stories in ways more interesting ways than just being "strong".
At least we'll always have Kingdom Hearts...! He... He... He...
@allenharper2928 That's literally all I have to look forward to. And even then it's clear that the upcoming movies that'll be represented will be these dumpster fires.
My question is- why couldnt it be Vanellope being the one who is clingy and needing to learn not to be clinging to her "one and only best friend" if they wanted to keep that plot- or hell make the movie about Ralph and Felix, since Felix was the only person who wasn't a complete jerk (from what i remember at least its been a bit since I saw the original) to him at the start- and yknow- both Felix and Ralph are ADULTS- and its kinda weird how this movie portrays Ralph (an adult) being so obsessive and clingy to a literal child instead of a more fatherly or brotherly friendship they had in the first??? Which is also why I feel like the film would do better if Vanellope was the one who was being clingy, she could even have a moment of finding that "dream game to go turbo in" and have a realization that she wants that sort of change but because of how much she clings to Ralph for support it challenges her in multiple ways which helps her grow into being a better and less clingy friend. It could have been such a easy fix where they didn't have to straight up butcher Ralph as a character.
Honestly yeah, Vanellope in the first movie acted all buddy buddy to Ralph when they were working together and when they became friends. Considering Vanellope was an emotional kid that was alone for who knows how long, it'd make more sense for her to be the clingy one. That would have been better
@@trollanlord85Yeah, because having Ralph being the clingy one is kind of creepy, That seems like an good idea!
As someone who really likes Venelope and finds a lot of comfort in her because of my disabilities the sheer anger Rokotar has over how they treat it in Ralph breaks the internet makes me very happy
Funny how Disney sequels can't find the right footing yet Dreamworks does super great with them
Still waiting for Megamind 2, that movie deserves a sequel tbh
@@bradwhite5884 Yes, but unless they pull an Incredibles 2 and do it in 2024, it's not happening, sadly
Yeah it seems like a good Disney sequel only happens once in a blue moon, the Toy Story sequels are some of the only Disney sequels that can be considered good, mostly the 2nd and 3rd movie though, the 4th really didn’t need to happen, but I don’t hate it as much as some other people, even some more obscure sequels like Lion King 2 Simba’s pride, and Cinderella 3 A Twist in Time are actually great sequels as well. Here’s to hoping that Inside Out 2 will be as good or better than the original when it comes out in 2024.
Side note: I think I’ve heard a rumor that an original paper was discovered not that long ago that was written by Walt Disney himself that said something like wishing that sequels, reboots, or remakes never be made from movies that are made by the company Disney itself. Maybe that was a sign that the company Disney itself should listen to if that’s actually true, in order to respect Walt Disney’s wishes.
What’s also funny is that strangely Dreamworks hasn’t gone full woke yet unlike Disney and many other American companies though unfortunately they have gone woke to some extent such as with that horrid woke She Ra reboot which is utterly woke to the point of absurdity.
@@bradwhite5884 Megamind deserves a sequel, but it’s probably never gonna happen. Unless dreamworks pulls a fast one on us-
Doing the math on the price of the wheel shows that Sugar Rush shouldn't have still been plugged in anyway. The wheel is $200 and the owner says that's more than the game makes in a year. That means Sugar Rush is making less than 75 cents on average every day. No one is playing it and it isn't even worth using electricity regardless of it working or not.
SERIOUSLY.
This is quite literally a “look how they massacred my boi” moment. Honestly one of the biggest reasons this movie upsets me is just how they took everything I loved from the first film (which is honestly still one of my favorite Disney films of all time) and threw it all out the window. I do think the fact that Disney wanted to touch on toxic friendships in this movie was actually pretty cool, but in doing so they completely botched both Ralph and Vanellope’s characters which is just really infuriating. Overall I really liked this breakdown of the movie it was pretty entertaining the whole way! (And I always get a kick out of people trashing on this movie.)
For context this videos title was made before Megamind 2 came out
In case you don't already know, that one isn't a sequel movie. It's a feature length pilot episode to the Megamind Rules TV series. Dreamworks poorly advertised it enough that the public has been mistaking it to be a sequel to the first movie. If it was a sequel movie then they would have released it theatrically and made it with a higher budget, instead of having it be made by Peacock and be released strait onto that company's streaming service.
@@Hedgie3they did advertise it as a sequel
Much like the first movie, Sonic’s cameos are the best thing about this film, to me! With good writing and voice direction, Roger Craig Smith sounds fantastic! However, the difference is that Sonic is one of the many things that makes the first movie the masterpiece it is, while in this movie, he’s one of the few things that prevents this movie from being the complete disaster it is.
“You do and you don’t? Duality. That’s very deep, Ralph.”
“Thanks, Sonic.”
🦔💙
Roger Craig Smith is the best. 💙
I remember being upset when I heard that he was retiring but then he returned for Sonic Frontiers.
@@Jack_Saint_Archive Trust me, bro. I know the feeling. And I’m more than pleased to say he killed it!
Honestly I feel it's a disservice to the first movie that the cameos get so hyped up when it has fantastic original characters (like if people went nuts over a Power Rangers toy in Toy Story instead of the cast) but the second movie is so cameo-oversaturated (more screen time than Felix and Calhoun, half the damn main cast) that there's not much else sadly
I did like that we got to see a bit of the arcade's culture, like how the Bad-Anon room is used for a book club too, that was cute
That awkward moment when Disney respects a beloved IP by casting the same voice actor, but Illumination settles for Chris Pratt…
@@Luke_SkywaIker Embarrassing! Tho, hot take, I don’t mind Chris Pratt as Mario.
This movie just gives me many frustrating questions, like:
Why couldn’t Ralph/Vanellope just wait until nighttime for the new shortcut, or even let players discover it on their own?
Why were people hating on Ralph as if he was real, even though nobody knows that there’s a secret world inside of video games/the internet? That’s like if I went onto the Nintendo Switch Parental Control video and just started randomly insulting bowser’s appearance.
And the one that goes against the original movie the most- Why did Ralph and Vanellope just forget or not care about all the dangerous stuff and risky stuff that can happen when you ‘go Turbo’?!
ralph and valnelope's relationship goes from a cute found family father-daughter shared trauma relationship. to what feels borderline like Chris Hansen should be notified.
Ralph, take a seat. I wanna talk to you for a minute
@@rosestar1324 Well you can say that you want to be friends… but I got the Chat Logs here
36:50 well Turbo went to the other game not because it was cooler, but because it was better than him and he craved ALL OF THE ATTENTION. But yeah it’s still selfish for Vanellope to leave
I refuse to believe that the Ralph in this movie is the same Ralph from the first one. Maybe there's two Ralphs that live in the dump, and the real Ralph just got lost back there and the Ralph in this destructive Ralph took over their game
Exactly. The Ralph we see in this film is nothing like the Ralph we saw in the first film
the ralph in breaks the internet is a prototype of the ralph virus clones
Good theory. The real Ralph after the 2012 film may have either
A. Got buried between the dumps allowing BTI Ralph to roam free.
B. Real Ralph passed out in Tapper's again or something, thus allowing BTI Ralph to also roam free.
C. BTI Ralph kidnapped the real Ralph and locked him away in a cage, just to ruin his whole career.
I pretend he died in the first movie and the second movie is a lie
Judy Hopps: Wreck-It-Ralph (Ralph Breaks the Internet) you're under arrest
Ralph: For what?
Nick Wilde: Here are all your crimes: Number One, being in Sugar Rush during live arcade hours in LitWak's Arcade when you should be in your game, Fix-It-Felix Jr. which could have gotten it unplugged, Number Two, Being a man-child and a complete idiot with no intelligence whatsoever and not acting your age and being an overly clingy best friend to Vanellope when you should have been an overprotective father or older brother. Number Three, indirectly getting Sugar Rush unplugged leaving it’s residents homeless and not comforting Vanellope when she was in pain over it since your too full of yourself to do so, number four, trying to shoplift the Sugar Rush steering wheel on EBay, number five, throwing a temper tantrum and damaging someone’s internet connection with an EBay billboard crushing their internet avatar, number six, forcing people to watch your videos on BuzzTube though you did have a permit to upload them all, and the last worst ones of all, trying to steal Shank’s car in Slaughter Race for money and getting a computer virus, Arthur from Double Dan and crashing Slaughter Race with it and having your Ralph Clones almost destroy and crash the entire internet and World Wide Web!!!!
Ralph: (Remorseful) EBoyyyy
Princess Vanelope: Well, at least I am let off the hook.
First Order stormtroopers: Not so fast, kid you are still under arrest for doing a pop-up add without a permit in Oh My Disney and trying to go Turbo and take over Slaughter Race.
Ralph: Oh well, prison it is! We will have time to think over our actions while we are there!
It’s baffling to know that Ralph Breaks the Internet has a Rotten Tomato score of 88%, yet Wreck-it Ralph has a score of 87%, even though I’m sure the vast majority of us here would agree that Wreck-it Ralph is way better than Ralph Breaks the Internet.
Agreed. In my opinion, the first one is better. But not because the second one sucks. I think it’s good but not amazing or anything 7/10. But yeah, The first Wreck-it-Ralph is a cinematic masterpiece 10/10.
Rotten Tomatoes and Critics don’t deserve to be taken seriously anymore especially considering what they think are good movies like the aforementioned Ralph Breaks The Internet and Cuties not to mention Rotten Tomatoes isn’t above rigging the critic and audience scores like with The Woman King (a rather terrible movie). They also hated on The Super Mario Bros. Movie for the stupidest reasons ever.
She- hulk is 77% on Rotten Tomatoes. Ignore Rotten tomatoes.
Way better is an understatement.
@@skylord1846 7/10 is still too damn high
I still remember the climax of the final fight, where Ralph recited the villains association oath while holding onto the medal from Vanellope, and I teared up there. Ralph wasn't lonely, he was, kinda, but he was more like tired of being labelled as bad and evil simply because he's the antagonist of his game. That's why seeing Ralph in the sequel really rubbed me the wrong way, not only that it's creepy that he acted like that when he's a freaking grown man obsessed over his child friend, it's like Rockotar said, it's not like Vanellope was his only friend! He has Felix, the NPCs in the game accepted him after the ending, and then he should have his fellow villain association buddies! But the most of all, the sequel actively destroyed that scene from the first movie for me. That scene was where he found peace, his answer, he doesn't have to be "good", because there's still someone who loved and cared for him for who he was, he even solidified it in his closing line to the movie. The sequel then basically turned him into a manbaby who throws a tantrum because he can't have his friend for himself. Vanellope was awfully done too, don't get me wrong, but it's just insidious how dirty they did Ralph after his emotional journey that resonates with a lot of people who struggled with their sense of belonging. It's sad that not many people realize just how bad this movie is.
They literally tried to do the Marx brothers auction scene but failed miserably 💀
The worst part of the eBay scene is that it's completely inaccurate to how bidding on eBay works.
I told myself that the website understood them as two different users so they were bidding against /each other/. It's been a minute since I watched this trainwreck though lol.
@@psychotophatcat I haven’t watched this horrid movie in several YEARS and well I vow to NEVER watch it again.
@psychotophatcat Yes, they counted as two users bidding against each other. And yes, the eBay auctioneer should have been able to easily recognize that these two "competing bidders" who were giggling together were in obvious collusion to spam the price up.
I think the main reason why this movie wasn’t blasted with criticism at first was because people were comparing it to the Emoji Movie
Disney: Did ya like Wrecks it ralph?
Everybody: yes
Disney: Good, it's time to ruin it.
Everybody could have pretended to say no so the Disney wouldn’t have to ruined it
Time to wreck it, if you will
Megamind vs. the Doom Syndicate: "I'm bouta ruin his whole career"