How to use a Sturmtiger

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 жов 2019
  • Based on Documents from February 1945 „Guidelines for the Employment of the Assault Mortar Battery 38 cm RW 61” (“Richtlinien für den Einsatz der Sturmmörser-Batterie 38 cm RW 61“) we look in this video on how a Sturmtiger Battery was used and also some aspects of the vehicle that are usually not (or maybe have never been covered) in the literature as well.
    Disclaimer: Video Footage taken at the Deutsche Panzermuseum Munster in 2018 & 2019, thank you for the Invitation!
    Check out their UA-cam Channel here: / @daspanzermuseum
    »» SUPPORT MHV ««
    » Paypal Donation - paypal.me/mhvis
    » Patreon Perks » patreon - / mhv
    » Subscribe Star Community - www.subscribestar.com/mhv
    » UA-cam Membership - / @militaryhistoryvisual...
    » Book Wishlist www.amazon.de/gp/registry/wis...
    »» MERCHANDISE ««
    » teespring - teespring.com/stores/military...
    » SOURCES «
    BAMA: RH 11-I/25: Richtlinien für den Einsatz der Sturmmörser-Batterie 38 cm RW 61, General der Artillerie, OKH, 12. 2. 1945.
    H. Dv. 200/5: Ausbildungsvorschrift für die Artillerie. Heft 5: Die Führung der Artillerie. E. S. Mittler & Sohn: Berlin, 1937.
    Jentz, Thomas L.: Panzertruppen 2 - The Complete Guide to the Creation & Combat Employment of Germany’s Tank Force - 1943-1945. Schiffer Military History: Atglen, USA, 1996.
    Hahn, Fritz: Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933-1945. Dörfler Verlag: Eggolsheim, o.J.
    Spielberger, Walter J.; Doyle, Hilary L.: Tigers I and II and Their Variants (Spielberger German Armor and Military Vehicle)
    Spielberger, Walter J.; Doyle, Hilary L.: Panzer VI Tiger und seine Abarten. Motorbuch Verlag: Stuttgart, 2010.
    Chamberlain, Peter; Doyle, Hilary: Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two. Revised Edition. Arms & Armour: London, UK, 1999.
    Condell, Bruce (ed.); Zabecki, David T. (ed.): On the German Art of War. Truppenführung. Stackpole Books: Mechanicsburg, PA, USA, 2009 (2001)
    Stahel, David: Operation Barbarossa and Germany’s Defeat in the East. Cambridge University Press: UK, 2009
    Cutland, Richard: Inside the Tanks: The Sturmtiger - World of Tanks. Wargaming Europe. UA-cam, 2015.
    • Inside The Tanks: The ...
    www.lonesentry.com/ordnance/21...
    nigelef.tripod.com/errorsmista...
    www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER...
    #Sturmtiger #Tanks #Panzer

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @A-Forty3707
    @A-Forty3707 4 роки тому +2113

    How to escape the strumtiger when they engine is burning
    Comander: hatch on top
    Driver : hatch in front
    Gunner: the barrel of the gun

    • @theyoshi202
      @theyoshi202 4 роки тому +76

      Wouldn’t wanna be the gunner 😂

    • @VonSchpam
      @VonSchpam 4 роки тому +247

      Commander: Oh God, The tank is on fire!
      Gunner: Now I am the projectile.

    • @jacobnewcombe5367
      @jacobnewcombe5367 4 роки тому +95

      777Dubliner there is multiple photos of gunners and other crewmen exiting though the barrel.

    • @waxbatung9304
      @waxbatung9304 3 роки тому +9

      🤣

    • @raiaqila1443
      @raiaqila1443 3 роки тому +47

      I mean, it is possible crews have done that. There's multiple photos of people fitting through the barrel.

  • @kilaliam671
    @kilaliam671 4 роки тому +1409

    Shout out to the germans trying to equip the imperial guard 38000 years early

    • @drunkengoldfish2628
      @drunkengoldfish2628 3 роки тому +38

      I think it looks like the plague burst crawler of the death guard

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 3 роки тому +9

      Is that a reference to the RW61?

    • @rixille
      @rixille 3 роки тому +66

      ​@@looinrims I think they are talking about the Imperial Guard's Demolisher cannon in the Warhammer 40k universe, which has an appearance straight from the Sturmtiger's gun. It is used by the Imperial Guard on their Leman Russ tanks and the Baneblade. The Space Marines also use it in their vindicator tank, which is fixed at the front of the hull.

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 3 роки тому +7

      @@rixille no I meant the 38000 part, I get it’s warhammer 40k

    • @rixille
      @rixille 3 роки тому +2

      @@looinrims Maybe.

  • @slypask9185
    @slypask9185 4 роки тому +1880

    Germans engineers : "this conversion make the Sturmtiger actually 8 tons heavier than the Tiger I"
    Tiger transmission : **incoherent screaming**

    • @konigstiger3782
      @konigstiger3782 4 роки тому +160

      That comment Hit's me Like an 88mm Flak 36

    • @yousefseed1874
      @yousefseed1874 4 роки тому +77

      Doesn't matter. If they can kill enemies at higher rate than losing their own before they break their transmission, it's still a win for the Germans

    • @SouthParkCows88
      @SouthParkCows88 4 роки тому +10

      @@konigstiger3782 or a 88mm Flak 18........ehh....ehh....ehh.

    • @javaboiiii
      @javaboiiii 4 роки тому +45

      Tiger transmission : *Am i joke to you?*

    • @sevenproxies4255
      @sevenproxies4255 4 роки тому +107

      German engineers to Tiger transmission: "Bite the pillow honey, Papa's gonna switch holes"

  • @fraserpeddie9416
    @fraserpeddie9416 4 роки тому +2580

    Thanks for the video, I was really confused as to what I should do with the 4 stumtigers I have laying around, now I know

    • @brianreddeman951
      @brianreddeman951 4 роки тому +126

      I know right but does anyone know where the shaped charge ammunition is? The manual says we have some but none of ammuntion crates are marked as such.

    • @Aaryq
      @Aaryq 4 роки тому +42

      This is the best comment I've read on the internet today

    • @alecjones4135
      @alecjones4135 4 роки тому +6

      Steel division 2

    • @gawdsuniverse3282
      @gawdsuniverse3282 4 роки тому +25

      I use mine as potplants

    • @aoofmg6684
      @aoofmg6684 4 роки тому +4

      Probably nothing cause you need a hell a load of trucks to use them

  • @J4CKAL05
    @J4CKAL05 4 роки тому +293

    "So what skills do you feel you can bring to this job?"
    "Well I know how to command a Sturmtiger battery..."
    "Say no more. We need more people just like you."

  • @InvertedGigachad
    @InvertedGigachad 4 роки тому +433

    Finally a guide to use my Sturmtiger. That thing has been collceting dust in my garage for 70 years. Dankesehr!

  • @FlymanMS
    @FlymanMS 4 роки тому +696

    "Next time when you command a German army" says a man with German accent in a video about WW2 tank. Hmm....

    • @mixererunio1757
      @mixererunio1757 4 роки тому +114

      Three times the charm I guess...

    • @Verpal
      @Verpal 4 роки тому +87

      @@mixererunio1757 BBC: German UA-camr led armed rebellion just overthrown German Federal Republic, and declare return of Kaiserreich.
      Next on BBC: Find the Best London Breakfast restaurant!

    • @fokker_dr1706
      @fokker_dr1706 4 роки тому +142

      @@Verpal He is actually austrian. An Austrian wouldn't overthrow the german government...
      Oh, wait a second

    • @isaiahcampbell488
      @isaiahcampbell488 4 роки тому +22

      If world wars works out like movie sequels the third one won't be near as GREAT as the first one.

    • @Verpal
      @Verpal 4 роки тому +4

      @@isaiahcampbell488 Yeah, there will be greater budget, the runtime is too low for us to enjoy though.

  • @villehammar7858
    @villehammar7858 4 роки тому +608

    125 kg warhead? This vehicle sounds like something you'd see in an Imperial Guard artillery regiment, not on an actual battlefield.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 4 роки тому +130

      Where do you think the creators of wh40k got their ideas from?

    • @markb6978
      @markb6978 4 роки тому +43

      It’s a Leman Russ Thunderer Siege Tank

    • @abdulamar9907
      @abdulamar9907 4 роки тому +34

      @@markb6978 Or more accurately, it's the Spehs Mehreens Vindicator, which is the very exact thing.

    • @markb6978
      @markb6978 4 роки тому +12

      Abdul Amar Eh, I can sorta see the boxy design in both, but the Vidicator really looks exactly like an APC with a huge gun stuck to it. The thunderer has the same background as the sturmtiger, being converted from damaged hulls sent back from the front.

    • @VGLounge
      @VGLounge 4 роки тому +9

      I wonder how Nazi Germany would fare in the 40k universe if they had all the resources to build all their craziest ideas en masse

  • @notasmith8163
    @notasmith8163 4 роки тому +262

    Ah this question, well my personal answer is simple:
    *”You don’t.”*

    • @christiandauz3742
      @christiandauz3742 4 роки тому

      Send the Strumtigers back in time to the Holy Roman Empire
      It would crush knights!

  • @anti-defecationleague5180
    @anti-defecationleague5180 4 роки тому +180

    7:29
    Me: How do you spell that?
    German: Just like it sounds.
    Me: **snaps pencil**

    • @nilloc93
      @nilloc93 4 роки тому +17

      immediately followed by "eleven trucks"

    • @krismakardikan9823
      @krismakardikan9823 4 роки тому

      Äss-dee-Koo-äff-tzeta.

    • @teutonic_crusader1175
      @teutonic_crusader1175 4 роки тому +23

      Sonderkraftfahrzeug Zwei-einundfünfizig Schrägstrich Achtzehn.
      (literally "special motor vehicle two-fiftyone diagonal slash eighteen.")

    • @vitamulten1395
      @vitamulten1395 4 роки тому +5

      You will need several pencils to write that down.

    • @psychiatry-is-eugenics
      @psychiatry-is-eugenics 4 роки тому +1

      Captions work for this video

  • @endlesnights3817
    @endlesnights3817 4 роки тому +370

    "1. Ammunition loadout: 22 rounds per barrel, 12 rounds in the gun;"
    Took me a second to realise you meant 12 round inside each vehicle, not all 12 loaded into the barrel at once.

    • @prd6617
      @prd6617 4 роки тому +15

      so its 22 round for each barrel (meaning its barrel life only "good" for 22 shot, after that have to be replaced) and each tank only have 12 round ready before resuply

    • @wjlasloThe2nd
      @wjlasloThe2nd 4 роки тому +34

      @@prd6617 No, barrel life should be quite good, but shells are issued such that the battery should always have 22 per operational gun, 12 of those can be fit into the ammo racks of the gun, 1 on the loading tray, and 1 in the chamber.

    • @raptorteam486
      @raptorteam486 4 роки тому +25

      12 rounds in the barrel.
      When you really really really wanted those Poles dead

    • @gon4455
      @gon4455 4 роки тому +4

      You watch too much spongebob square pants lol

    • @thehypest6118
      @thehypest6118 4 роки тому +1

      @@wjlasloThe2nd so where are the other 8 rounds?

  • @hawkerhellfire9152
    @hawkerhellfire9152 4 роки тому +59

    What interests me the most is that they were writing out field manuals as their country collapsed around them. I wonder how many times the lad typing this out had his work interrupted by Air raids.

    • @samuelmay4823
      @samuelmay4823 3 роки тому +3

      Lol. Thats great. Yes so german!

  • @MrTJPAS
    @MrTJPAS 4 роки тому +154

    This is the thing you research in HOI4 in 1951, after you've researched *literally everything else* and are just going through the variants of the tank tree even though you're making modern armor at that point.

    • @anti-defecationleague5180
      @anti-defecationleague5180 4 роки тому +8

      Lol yeah it is. Along with the carrier capable early fighters

    • @charliehale4172
      @charliehale4172 4 роки тому +6

      @@anti-defecationleague5180 hahahaha. We need more HOI 4 love in the world. You going to play the new France re-work?

    • @Stinger913
      @Stinger913 4 роки тому +4

      How do I win was democratic Czechoslovakia.
      There shall only be death before dishonor I say.

    • @christiandauz3742
      @christiandauz3742 4 роки тому

      Give all the Allied nations in 1936 every technology
      Watch as Germany, Italy and Japan lose in just months

    • @pteppig
      @pteppig 3 роки тому

      @@christiandauz3742 well, the USA indiustry was a money cheat irl, still took years to defend the axis and they never had the reserves and couldnt use the chance to continue and finish up comunists as well before they gt the a-bomb

  • @menselv7142
    @menselv7142 4 роки тому +57

    Boss: do you have any interesting skills that might come to use in our printing company?
    Me, sweating and stuttering: I - I - I know h-how to use a sturmtiger...
    Boss [under his breath]: holy shit

    • @muvs32pap
      @muvs32pap 4 роки тому +3

      Should we label our newfound skills under hard or soft variety!

  • @biko9824
    @biko9824 4 роки тому +827

    We really need this in War Thunder haha
    Edit: oh wait the reload is 15 *minutes*

    • @reign_of_stuka8991
      @reign_of_stuka8991 4 роки тому +94

      Make sure the shot counts xd

    • @endlesnights3817
      @endlesnights3817 4 роки тому +27

      There is a version you could use in single player mission. They increased the reload speed by a few minutes.

    • @biko9824
      @biko9824 4 роки тому +43

      Nep Nep first let all the hellcats cap, nuke cap, get quad kill, hop out, boom plane spawn
      Should work

    • @reign_of_stuka8991
      @reign_of_stuka8991 4 роки тому +33

      It's like the opposite of capping a point and spawning in the PE-8 xd

    • @biko9824
      @biko9824 4 роки тому +4

      Nep Nep ye

  • @timmyalexandranova
    @timmyalexandranova 4 роки тому +31

    1. Aim
    2. Fire
    3. Wonder were your target went
    Edit: Thank you for the wonderful video. It was very well researched and explained.

  • @AlteraLin
    @AlteraLin 4 роки тому +36

    Sturmtiger Engineers: So how big do you want the gun?
    Hitler: YES.

    • @The_Murder_Party
      @The_Murder_Party 4 роки тому +3

      Alterius Zhang in Hamburg: points out window at the cardboard cutout of the Bismarck, see that? I want that.

  • @LongNightsInOffice
    @LongNightsInOffice 4 роки тому +93

    Can we all take a step back in think about how insane it is to find the time to write and print a manual like this while everything is going to shit. I mean this was produced when the end of the war was in sight for everyone

    • @markholm6955
      @markholm6955 4 роки тому +1

      LongNightsInOffice Apparently not for the true believers

    • @flusenbart
      @flusenbart 4 роки тому +33

      Welcome to Germany. If it's not extensively written it doesn't exist. :-)

    • @sol2544
      @sol2544 4 роки тому +30

      "Write this manual!"
      "Alright!"
      "Nicht, nevermind, burn it!"
      "Why?"
      "The doorbell rang. The Americans got here early!"

    • @muvs32pap
      @muvs32pap 4 роки тому +11

      Yes, the fact these men who compiled these manuals were able to compartmentalize and just go about their job in spite of clear doom is remarkable to me. This is an indication of just how regimented and disciplined the German army was. It is disturbing at times just how aloof the technician can remain in war...but that is the secret to waging war effectively as it were.

    • @michaelforadori2279
      @michaelforadori2279 4 роки тому

      flusenbart
      Ok
      : ) m’

  • @TheAdamk12
    @TheAdamk12 4 роки тому +138

    Your English pronunciation has improved a lot over there years. You should be proud of your hardwork.
    This has to be the coolest tank of WWII

  • @arnonuhm6922
    @arnonuhm6922 4 роки тому +101

    What I would really like to know: how do you handle a 350kg shell with 5 men in less space of that half of of my kitchen? While under enemy fire.

    • @CptInside
      @CptInside 4 роки тому +31

      This thing had a crane aboard to help the crew reloading :)

    • @5peciesunkn0wn
      @5peciesunkn0wn 4 роки тому +31

      Yeah, as Rasierklinge said, there's a crane on the back and there's a tray inside that fits to the hatch he peered through in the video. Crane picks up shell, shell is pushed into hatch and along the tray, stuff gets done to make said shell ready to go 'fwoooosh *BOOM!* ', shell is slid into the breech, breech is closed, shell goes 'fwoooosh *BOOM!* '.

    • @durstloscher2362
      @durstloscher2362 4 роки тому +17

      "While under enemy fire"
      Well reminds me of hearing about US troops didnt wanted to use the backpack Flamethrower becouse you where instandly the target #1 for every Japanese out there...but some still done the job becouse SOMEONE had to do it even when hell was around them and people got used to fighting in bad situations.

    • @crunch9876
      @crunch9876 4 роки тому +7

      You didn’t. These where never close to the battlefield. They shot from behind friendly lines. Which made the armor useless. (Less than useless actually) there are good quotes of Xander’s criticizing this very point

    • @AdeneTzr
      @AdeneTzr 2 роки тому

      balls of steel

  • @maxkennedy8075
    @maxkennedy8075 4 роки тому +327

    How to use a Stürmtiger
    you sturm and the 38cm rocket launcher does the rest

  • @scipioafricanus6417
    @scipioafricanus6417 4 роки тому +73

    At a museum I visited in Switzerland the guide said that the artillery crew of a 105mm howitzer (ww2 era) had to fire 80 standard steel shrapnel rounds to cover an area of 80x80 m effectively.

    • @mathewkelly9968
      @mathewkelly9968 4 роки тому +1

      Scipio Africanus the intense rate for 105mm howitzer is 6 rounds per minute , so that's 360 rounds in an hour , and actually accurate ..... Keep up your wehreboo dreams of Nazi super weapons .

    • @scipioafricanus6417
      @scipioafricanus6417 4 роки тому +18

      My dreams of nazi superweapons? Pardon me,but I don't understand what you are trying to say.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 4 роки тому +10

      @@mathewkelly9968 I think that Scipio was pointing out just how monumentally insane the Sturmtiger is through comparison to conventional artillery rather than wherabooing.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 4 роки тому +6

      @AKUJIRULE not sure what you mean there by noob, but for urban direct or indirect fire support simple infantry mortars, low velocity large caliber tank guns, man portable rocket launchers/recoilless rifles and literally anything else capable of the job in place of a repurposed 15 inch depth charge launcher with an absurdly low rate of fire would be just fine if not superior from an economy of force standpoint.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 4 роки тому +4

      @AKUJIRULE man portable launchers were in common use in WW2. Bazookas, panzerfausts, Piats etc were issued at the company level and were used against bunkers and other such strongpoins along with tanks and other less insane assault guns.

  • @viridisxiv766
    @viridisxiv766 4 роки тому +66

    when they said that the armour was like the tigers, they may have meant that the philosophy behind the distribution was the same that is to say that it was strong at the front and weak at the sides. this would be important for the crew to know, its effectively a warning to not show the sides of the tank to enemy fire.

    • @poldi2233
      @poldi2233 3 роки тому +5

      Kinda redundant since that was true for every tank back then

    • @bobsjepanzerkampfwagen4150
      @bobsjepanzerkampfwagen4150 3 роки тому +4

      Side armor of tiger was not thin at all there is pictures online with many shell dents on the sides

    • @v4enthusiast541
      @v4enthusiast541 3 роки тому +1

      @@poldi2233- Tiger II has much stronger side armour (plus bonus of being sloped)

  • @mysss29
    @mysss29 4 роки тому +19

    "[A] battery of four Sturmtiger, or more correctly, the single one that actually shows up."

  • @SouthParkCows88
    @SouthParkCows88 4 роки тому +119

    Four shots per hour, no wonder why it takes so long to fire one shell in Men of War.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 4 роки тому +12

      No kidding. Same in company of heroes but it's front armor is so bullshit that whatever survived the first shot has little chance of killing it unless they immobilize it first.

    • @markfryer9880
      @markfryer9880 4 роки тому +14

      When was the last time you had to manuver a 345 kg cylindrical object that could blow you to kingdom come?
      I reckon 4 per hour is pretty good.

    • @pickeljarsforhillary102
      @pickeljarsforhillary102 4 роки тому +1

      Introduced to WoT and the match would be over before the first round is loaded.

    • @crunch9876
      @crunch9876 4 роки тому

      PickelJars ForHillary it’s in warthunder I believe

    • @TerribleHamster
      @TerribleHamster 4 роки тому

      @@crunch9876 That is the Brumbar (smaller cousin)

  • @Swindle1984
    @Swindle1984 2 роки тому +27

    If I recall correctly, the one and only time a Sturmtiger engaged enemy armor, it fired a single shot at a group of Sherman tanks and blew up most of them. Which makes me wonder just how effective the Sturmtiger would have been if it had been introduced earlier in the war and had sufficient ammo.

    • @areusure538
      @areusure538 Рік тому +7

      That question literally aplies to most late war german tanks

    • @williampan29
      @williampan29 Рік тому +4

      no point because a sturmtiger is an assault gun with no turning turret, therefore not suitable for offensive operations, which the Germany was carrying out at the time.
      the only way I could think of their use at the time was to fight against occupied territory's insurgents or defend supply line for Eastern front. But 1) the much cheaper armored cars at the time were sufficient enough for the 1st task. and 2) The Germany's logistic was a nightmare throughout war and I doubt they could maintain them.

    • @Swindle1984
      @Swindle1984 Рік тому +2

      @@williampan29 An assault gun... is not suitable for offensive operations. You may want to look up a couple words in the dictionary.

    • @alex_zetsu
      @alex_zetsu Рік тому +2

      Well the problem is the Sturmtiger inherits the flaws of the Tiger of being a maintenance nightmare and not being very fast. You then add to the fact that it has no turret and that means eventually the target is probably just going to move out of the way. These things kept breaking down constantly, although not nearly as much as the Ferdinand which was too heavy for its under engineered engine.

    • @Swindle1984
      @Swindle1984 Рік тому

      @@alex_zetsu It takes 30 minutes to reload. This is not a tank destroyer, but something that can lob rockets at enemy armor formations and hope the blast gets a few.

  • @thomasglessner6067
    @thomasglessner6067 Рік тому +2

    Another great video. I like the text from the period. Also like the commentary.
    Thank you for your hard work.

  • @4991Ares
    @4991Ares 4 роки тому +21

    Throw weight per hour:
    Sturmkitty: 4*125 = 500 kg/hour
    10.5cm leFH 18: 180-220*1.85 = 333-407 kg/hour
    15cm sFB 18: 100-120*5.1kg = 510-612 kg/hour
    Quantity may have a quality all of it's own - but the bunker you're sitting in is going to disagree with that statement if it ever comes under sustained fire from a battery of these things. That's a whole lot of throw weight, even considering rate of fire.

    • @5peciesunkn0wn
      @5peciesunkn0wn 4 роки тому +3

      that's what it was meant to do. Blow open bunkers and fortified positions.

    • @uteriel282
      @uteriel282 4 роки тому +2

      @@5peciesunkn0wn
      it also works wonders in clearing out trenches, flattening city blocks and turning an army regiment into minced meat.
      put 3 of these next to each other and you pretty much got one turret of battleship bismarck aiming at your position.

    • @Blei1986
      @Blei1986 4 роки тому

      sure, but their accuracy seems to be really bad.
      it only seem to be good enough for direct fire to the target

  • @hook86
    @hook86 3 роки тому +4

    Glad this video came out. Been trying to figure out how to use the battery of SturmTigers I've had laying around for awhile now

  • @eesguidetothegalaxy3907
    @eesguidetothegalaxy3907 4 роки тому +26

    I am always impressed by your research and presentation. I was wondering after you cited your source in the beginning of the presentation how accurate your information would be as you cited what seemed to be the German field manual to operate the vehicle. I was thinking well how many instructional guides really reflect reality, especially in war in a fighting situation. But then you corrected the manual when it compared the tanks armor to the Tiger and I was like damn, he doesn't let anything slip by him! Anyway, really enjoy your videos, I'm a big WWII buff and I've been playing a lot of HOI IV lately. I watch your videos and watch other WWII documentaries/movies at the same time, lots of fun. Have you played Hearts of Iron IV? What do you think?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  4 роки тому +5

      On my second channel I have some thoughts about hoi4. On this you can historical division layoutsm

  • @DjSeptimus
    @DjSeptimus 4 роки тому +123

    Sturmtiger? You mean the THICCtiger?

    • @Taistelukalkkuna
      @Taistelukalkkuna 4 роки тому +14

      Hey, no weight shaming the tank. You know they´ve been through rough stuff in Eastern Front. They just compensate for trauma.

    • @DerUserYT
      @DerUserYT 3 роки тому

      Its dummy thicc

  • @HerrGausF
    @HerrGausF 4 роки тому +11

    Correction on the wheels: All types of Tiger I were used for conversion, early and mid models were simply fitted with late steel wheels during the conversion.

  • @nathanbasset
    @nathanbasset 4 роки тому +6

    Thank god, just picked some up and was looking for a tutorial. I’ll show those judges art.

  • @Chauc3r
    @Chauc3r 4 роки тому +3

    I read/listened to something recently on the Sturmtiger that I found very interesting. Basically, the thought process is why would it need to be so heavily armored when it is so far away from actual action. You could literally put this mortar on something like a RSO and have the same effectiveness and have it much lighter.

  • @tireachan6178
    @tireachan6178 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent video. I commend you on your level of detail and research.

  • @logoseven3365
    @logoseven3365 4 роки тому

    Thanks for showing this. I have one sitting behind my shed and didn’t know how operate it.

  • @shinoasahina4757
    @shinoasahina4757 4 роки тому +6

    AH yes, quality content right here !
    Now all i need is to take a trip to Germany and order a custom-made Sturmtiger and it's also the hardest part :(

  • @khartog01
    @khartog01 4 роки тому +5

    The Demolisher cannon. One of the eleven guns on the Baneblade.

    • @ovasquezg23
      @ovasquezg23 4 роки тому +1

      We need adamantium suspensions!

  • @mcburcke
    @mcburcke 4 роки тому

    Cool vid! You do such a great job on them all...well done.

  • @MisteriosGloriosos922
    @MisteriosGloriosos922 2 роки тому

    Thanks for informative video. Good work!!

  • @weirdshibainu
    @weirdshibainu 4 роки тому +24

    No one:" Betcha cant make a hybrid tank that can shoot heavy marine artillery shells."
    German engineers:" Its Octoberfest, hold our many pilsners."

    • @Mortrag
      @Mortrag 4 роки тому +5

      Seriously; 1. There are no things like "pilsners", the plural of "ein Pils" are "mehrere Pils".
      And 2., if you are drinking Pils at the Oktoberfest, you are doing it double wrong. (Btw. probably every Bavarian is going to hunt you for this, even in your afterlive.)

    • @weirdshibainu
      @weirdshibainu 4 роки тому +4

      @@Mortrag fuck off ..its a joke.

    • @ska042
      @ska042 4 роки тому

      @@weirdshibainu ehh it kinda fails at being a "local color" joke since it gets the local color so wrong

    • @philipmorgan9006
      @philipmorgan9006 2 роки тому

      Perversely the Australians also mounted an anti-submarine weapon onto a tank. I don't think it actually saw service.

  • @marcelhalbich9301
    @marcelhalbich9301 4 роки тому +60

    I'm living just across the street of the OKH in Wünsdorf. Is it necessary to follow the chain of command or can I just throw the suggestions into the mail box?
    just out of curiosity...
    ;O)

    • @arnonuhm6922
      @arnonuhm6922 4 роки тому +15

      If you live in Germany, you should know the obvious answer (which of course is: Follow the chain of command!). How do you actually dare to ask this question?

    • @ninaakari5181
      @ninaakari5181 4 роки тому +4

      @@arnonuhm6922 he just have an sudden urge to ask guidence from Austrian guy

    • @Verpal
      @Verpal 4 роки тому +2

      @@ninaakari5181 Hmm..... which Austrian guy are you referring to? Seems like great advice!

    • @ninaakari5181
      @ninaakari5181 4 роки тому +4

      @@Verpal what could possibly go wrong when an Austrian guy gives some instructions for Germans?

    • @marcelhalbich9301
      @marcelhalbich9301 4 роки тому +1

      @@ninaakari5181 You're so right... it had been allways the best choice to ask an Austrian :)
      This worked well for over 1000 years now... uhm wait... maybe I mixed something up there ^^

  • @coreymerrill3257
    @coreymerrill3257 2 роки тому +1

    I really enjoy the technical I formation here and am super excited to hear temperature actually being considered when referring to the ammunition ballistics . pressure rises or falls depending on if warmer or colder. This is a main reason it's not advisable to use military 5.56 x45mm in a .223 Remington chambered firearm. While it fits , the military cover design is specifically for high pressure and reliability and 223rem is made to tight varmint rifle tollorences , with much shorter lead/throat and much sharper rifling onset angle . On a hot day , the military ammo can destroy the .223 chambered gun from pressure spikes ,from the bullet having to overcome more resistance to leave it's case and engage the rifling . Which is already accounted for with .223.
    A cannon would be no different and range would increase or decrease noticably in different temperature extremes . Thankyou for the thought inspiring video.

  • @Kallermatsch37
    @Kallermatsch37 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for the great video. I have a picture of me infront of the very same Sturmtiger, since I visited the tank museum with a few friends a few months ago.

  • @pekkamakela2566
    @pekkamakela2566 4 роки тому +6

    Maximum acceptable dispersion for field artillery battery is 2% of firing distance in firing direction. For artillery batallion max acceptable dispersion is 4% of firing distance. Sideways dispersion is half. These stats are from finnish army.

    • @edward9674
      @edward9674 4 роки тому

      Moi, what does dispersion mean within this context? T. Eetvartti

    • @readhistory2023
      @readhistory2023 4 роки тому +3

      I was US army FDC Chief for m110's and m109's and I've never heard of that. We used ICM vs HE to take out troops, light vehicles or tanks because ICM gives a good spread at impact. 155mm and 203mm isn't exactly a sniper rifle or a precision weapon system. However one of my favorite quotes from WW2 is from a German General at the end of the war. At the time USA was using the m12, a self propelled 155mm howitzer, to take out sniper positions. To roughly quote the General he said "When the USA starts using 155mm as a sniper weapon it's time to quit"

    • @pekkamakela2566
      @pekkamakela2566 4 роки тому

      @@edward9674 hajonta, distance between most distant shells in firemission.

    • @pekkamakela2566
      @pekkamakela2566 4 роки тому +2

      @@readhistory2023 different armies have very different ways of using artillery. In finnish army fire control is at platoon level and usually 18 gun minimum fire in a fire mission. I've read that in many armies control is much higher up in organization, and smaller firing units are also common.

    • @krismakardikan9823
      @krismakardikan9823 4 роки тому +1

      Brother told me about some coastal artillery training exercise firing at a moving surface target. They were supposed to fire ranging shots to get it "dialed in", but somebody destroyed the target with the very first shot and ruined the entire day for everybody.

  • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
    @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  4 роки тому +60

    If you like in-depth military history videos, consider supporting the channel:
    patreon.com/join/mhv/ --- www.subscribestar.com/mhv
    Get your Infographics Poster on the Medium Panzer Company from 1941 here: teespring.com/german-panzer-company-1941?tsmac=store&tsmic=military-history-visualized&pid=652&cid=102774
    Merchandise (T-Shirts & Posters), check out my store: teespring.com/stores/military-history-visualized

    • @richjageman3976
      @richjageman3976 4 роки тому +1

      Ordered it and waiting anxiously for the arrival.

    • @markjackson6026
      @markjackson6026 4 роки тому

      Can a German 15 cm round really weigh only 5 Kg when the NATO 155 mm is closer to 45?

    • @BenNy-dd6hh
      @BenNy-dd6hh 4 роки тому +1

      No, the 5 Kg is just the weight of the explosives inside the shell.

    • @markjackson6026
      @markjackson6026 4 роки тому

      @@BenNy-dd6hh ah thanks when he said warhead I was a bit confused

    • @BenNy-dd6hh
      @BenNy-dd6hh 4 роки тому

      I checked the weight of a Wehrmacht 150 mm round: It's 42 Kg. Source: Lexikon der Wehrmacht.

  • @blanst01
    @blanst01 4 роки тому

    Nice work (as usual 👍👍👍)

  • @muthatruckajones3314
    @muthatruckajones3314 4 роки тому

    Wow the information is top notch

  • @rgm96x49
    @rgm96x49 4 роки тому +4

    Wait, you mean you're NOT supposed to load a person into the gun?
    Well, damn, my neighbor really would've appreciated it if you uploaded this earlier, MHV.

  • @panzerfaust5046
    @panzerfaust5046 4 роки тому +31

    7:30 This is the most German sentence fragment I've ever heard.

    • @vitamulten1395
      @vitamulten1395 4 роки тому +6

      Sonderkraftfahrzeug Zwei-einundfünfzig Schrägstrich Achtzehn
      Shows up in google.

  • @shoe2241
    @shoe2241 4 роки тому +1

    great video!!! the sturm tiger is one of my favorite tanks!!! keep up the good work!!!

  • @ColoradoDualSport
    @ColoradoDualSport 4 роки тому +1

    What a great video! Thank you.

  • @jeffarchibald3837
    @jeffarchibald3837 4 роки тому +22

    You didn't cover the most important aspect: how was it loaded?

    • @voin5371
      @voin5371 4 роки тому +1

      I think this was more of a field manual for Officers than a Panzer Crewman manual.

    • @stephen1r2
      @stephen1r2 4 роки тому +1

      Very carefully -- always wear titanium toed boots.
      more seriously, I imagine that there are manual or electric chain hoists and a hydraulic rammer to get the warhead and its propellant charges into the breach. It's not like a field gun where you could have 12 guys running around.

    • @bertbergers9171
      @bertbergers9171 4 роки тому +1

      @@stephen1r2 it´s rocketpropelled, so no separate charges, just the complete shell to load. But still, yeah a hydraulic rammer would be nice :P

    • @m9078jk3
      @m9078jk3 4 роки тому +2

      I think there was a mounted crane on the top of the Sturmtiger and it was loaded from the outside into the barrel.

    • @MrRedeyedJedi
      @MrRedeyedJedi 4 роки тому

      I would imagine it was with chain driven winches

  • @DirtyHairy1
    @DirtyHairy1 4 роки тому +9

    World of Tanks:
    1. Load 1 round for 5 Minutes after deployment
    2. Shoot that round into a packed group of enemies and rek them, probably self killing in the process

  • @wigon
    @wigon 4 роки тому +1

    I would love to see something like this on the smaller Brummbär assault gun armored vehicle. Fantastic informative video overall. As someone who's been around and fascinated by the old U.S. Army M728 CEV (with its massive 165mm demolition gun), and having seen it in action, I've always been fascinated with such vehicles. I'm still not sure why the U.S. Army never fitted its more modern Abrams based replacements to the M728 with a similar or large assault gun as the snub-nosed cannons also make them more practical in narrow streets in an urban environment or in a forested area where a long cannon can snag on trees.

  • @heilaarnezki8222
    @heilaarnezki8222 3 роки тому

    Thank you for this relevant tutorial!

  • @justinmoe3171
    @justinmoe3171 4 роки тому +40

    Instructions unclear, still on the defensive and my army is destroyed.

  • @b.griffin317
    @b.griffin317 4 роки тому +6

    this assumes all four would show up to the battlefield. I'm sure you'd be lucky to get one.
    a one-gun battery, with 22 rounds. real good use of resources that.

    • @krishnam1
      @krishnam1 4 роки тому

      Hey, that's 2 hours of firing :-)

  • @CrusaderSports250
    @CrusaderSports250 3 роки тому

    That was very informative and interesting, thanks for that.

  • @finskiandguns8534
    @finskiandguns8534 3 роки тому

    Man who dislikes these videos? Clearly people who don’t like tanks or history so don’t bother watching. Love these videos! Keep it up

  • @grimmig13
    @grimmig13 4 роки тому +10

    @ 4:19 actually I was gonna ask why does the Kriegsmarine have an anti TANK sight...

    • @fi4re
      @fi4re 4 роки тому +5

      Could be for coastal bombardment. I think navies had (and still have) a large responsibility in that department.

    • @Otokichi786
      @Otokichi786 4 роки тому +3

      The Kriegsmarine feared "The Attack of the Swimming Tanks" on Baltic naval bases whether by Shermans or T-34s!;)

  • @jjc5475
    @jjc5475 4 роки тому +9

    hey can you do a video comparing modern to ww2 tanks to show what was learned from their flaws?

  • @samaeldesolado
    @samaeldesolado 4 роки тому

    Thank you for this interesting video !

  • @ChuckBame
    @ChuckBame Місяць тому

    Fascinating! Thank you.

  • @ThePancakeMan
    @ThePancakeMan 4 роки тому +3

    Just had a Gordon Ramsey ad on this vid.........
    Ended up cooking a königstiger
    Then eating the sturmgevehr.

  • @tkconyer4092
    @tkconyer4092 4 роки тому +4

    It actually called “Yeet and Delete”

  • @barelyasurvivor1257
    @barelyasurvivor1257 2 роки тому

    Ty for another great Video

  • @StaffordMagnus
    @StaffordMagnus 4 роки тому +2

    Surprisingly accurate for such a large weapon with several kilometers range.

  • @holyelliw
    @holyelliw 4 роки тому +3

    Do we know where the idea for the Stürmtiger came from? Was it supposed to be a bigger version of the Bummbär? I find it very strange that anyone thought "THAT is what we need!"

    • @Bochi42
      @Bochi42 4 роки тому +1

      My thoughts exactly. A regular Tiger would have been more useful and if the turret ring was too badly damaged to repair make it into an AT design like the Jagdpanther. Germany was completely on the defense by the time these were built and ready for action with allied air forces roaming the skies loading these these things must have been especially nerve racking and the smoke they give off when firing would be exactly what fighter bomber pilots were looking for. Absolutely foolish thing to build. I can imagine someone saying Hey we have these big anti-sub bombs that are useless why don't we try them for land use but, somebody should've said that's a complete waste of a Tiger I chassis and we don't have enough tanks and tank hunters as it is.

  • @ontaka5997
    @ontaka5997 4 роки тому +4

    So the Sturmpanzer IV (Brummbaer) wasn't good enough.
    I presume there was a demand for heavier firepower and better armour protection.
    At least the Panzer IV chassis had more maneuverability and easier to repair and maintain compared to a Tiger.

  • @StryderK
    @StryderK 4 роки тому

    Just a note. The Sturmtiger in Munster is actually a captured examples shipped to the US. After examination, it was put on display at Aberdeen proving ground. When Aberdeen went through it’s revamp and reorganization, a lot of pieces were sent elsewhere. All of the tanks went to a new museum in Ft. Bennings. The Sturmtiger was sent to Munster on loan, where it is still displayed today.

  • @michaelwier1222
    @michaelwier1222 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the video. Makes me want to run down to my local used armored vehicle lot and buy one.

  • @mandernachluca3774
    @mandernachluca3774 4 роки тому +11

    Isn't the shell of the Sturmtiger more of a gyrojet than a rocket, a bit like the "Werfergranate 21"?

    • @nilloc93
      @nilloc93 4 роки тому +13

      yes but remember, these were not made to be read by enthusiasts who watch videos of a German guy explaining the finer points of WW2 vehicles.
      This is being used by a poorly educated guy who got drafted 3 months ago and only has a basic understanding of how the vehicle works. Thus simpler terminology.
      If you want a modern day example of this, try to get your hands on the operators manual and maintenance manual for the same military vehicle. You'll be amazing at how wrong, but simpler, the wording in the operators manual is compared to the technospeak of the maint manual.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 4 роки тому +3

      The finer points of the distinction between the two would have been as lost on the average wehrmact soldier as they are on your average viewer today. Remember that the source is an operational manual not a technical manual and was likely simplified for the soldiers using the weapon.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 4 роки тому +1

      @@nilloc93 I can vouch for this having used the technical manual for the Abrams tank when I served and then read the Army tank platoon manual recently. There is a huge difference in the terminology.

  • @sctm81
    @sctm81 4 роки тому +4

    Pay attention, potential dictators: This is what you do if you dont have enough fuel for bombers.

  • @maxsilver6968
    @maxsilver6968 3 роки тому +1

    For some reason I really like your animation )) attractive style

  • @KitLoaf1
    @KitLoaf1 2 роки тому

    Thanks! This helped me alot!

  • @krishnam1
    @krishnam1 4 роки тому +21

    4 shots per hour? Wow. Wouldn't some heavy guns be faster & more effective? (esp given the amount of external support protection this behemoth needs?)

    • @Finkeren
      @Finkeren 4 роки тому +50

      "Wouldn't X be more effective?" The question that should have been asked far more often by German weapons manufacturers during WW2.

    • @Destyvirago
      @Destyvirago 4 роки тому +17

      well, if you watched the video you would know that they where usually used together at the same time, in other words 4 SturmTigers would fire at the same area at the same time. Also each shell contains 125kg of explosives, so basically 4 shots equals 500kg of explosives at the target in one volley. One 15cm shell from a heavy artillery contains 5.1 kg of explosives, so to get the same effect on target you would need about 100 artillery guns firing at once to get the same effect. Basically they where the ultimate shock and awe weapon if you need a little piece of the enemy front line obliterated every 15 min or so. That said the 15cm heavy artillery guns where more useful overall since they didn't need the same planning and logistics to work, but there is something fascinating about a tank with a 380mm gun..

    • @awf6554
      @awf6554 4 роки тому +6

      @@Destyvirago the heavy armour may have been justifiable for an army on the strategic offensive, but seems more of a liability for the Wehrmacht late in the war. The longish range of the mortar would suggest that a non or lightly armoured version would be more useful, increasing mobility, rate of fire, and decreasing logistical problems, without exposing the crew to excessive counter fire.

    • @matthewmcneany
      @matthewmcneany 4 роки тому +1

      One of the things that might be relevant is that over time people become desensitised, what might have been effective shock tactics in 1939 would not have had the same impact in 1944/5. The implication from the literature seems to have been that this was a weapon designed to be something of a focal point in assaults, deployed as much for the psychological impact it would have as the material one.
      Not to say you're wrong about it being an ineffective use of resources.

    • @amitabhakusari2304
      @amitabhakusari2304 4 роки тому +2

      What about the wide dispersion, wouldn't it be very costly to miss, given the maximum load-out is 12 per vehicle?

  • @PAWTeamUnited
    @PAWTeamUnited 4 роки тому +3

    Get 4 Of This
    And Strap It on to a Maus
    To Have a Portable Nuclear Assulting Bunker
    Also Have Like 200 Spare Transmissions

  • @SG-sk3kt
    @SG-sk3kt 3 роки тому +2

    thank God for this video, I was wondering what to use for my learner's license! Subbed

    • @Kallermatsch37
      @Kallermatsch37 3 роки тому +1

      Well you can clear the parking spots infront of your work from 5km away.

  • @yuzurucookie0227
    @yuzurucookie0227 4 роки тому

    This was such a cool video. A tank that shoot massive rocket artillery is something you don’t see everyday. I was wonder how you would even reload the rocket for that tank!

  • @sevenproxies4255
    @sevenproxies4255 4 роки тому +4

    From this day forwards, whenever someone says "The L-word" I wil always think of Logistics.

  • @9thperspectivegames
    @9thperspectivegames 3 роки тому +4

    So this is basically a tiger tank, firing Bismarck caliber V-2 rounds?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  3 роки тому +1

      good description! Although a bit more clumsy and I think I a bit more frontal armor if I remember correctly.

  • @maleficarus
    @maleficarus 2 роки тому

    Love his voice, makes the videos seem more real!

  • @NoPantsBaby
    @NoPantsBaby 2 роки тому

    This is very important information I will definitely need some day.

  • @omen5407
    @omen5407 4 роки тому +8

    Step 1: *Sturmtiger*

  • @Tacteyecool
    @Tacteyecool 4 роки тому +3

    Bought the tshirt

  • @qlacht294
    @qlacht294 3 роки тому

    Thanks, u helped me with my brand new sturmtiger

  • @skyfreezr
    @skyfreezr 2 роки тому

    First prototype of this vehicle was sent to level Warsaw during the Warsaw uprising (08/1944) and to help with demolition of the city after the rising. It was the very first version of it painted in standard issue dunkelgelb and without the flame deflector present in the later version used on the western front.

  • @gunnerr8476
    @gunnerr8476 4 роки тому +17

    1.Dismantle it
    2. Build other tanks

    • @insomniacbritgaming1632
      @insomniacbritgaming1632 4 роки тому +5

      Welcome to the issue of Nazi Germany... too many tank variations and not enough usable tanks

    • @scorchclasstitan6727
      @scorchclasstitan6727 3 роки тому

      Gunnerr why waste the metal when you can use 1 to destroy 20?

  • @matthewlee8667
    @matthewlee8667 4 роки тому +3

    Finally! Now I can finally fulfill my lifelong dream of being the ruler of Europe

  • @jjc5475
    @jjc5475 4 роки тому +1

    thanks you, helps a lot!

  • @warrencromwell4282
    @warrencromwell4282 9 місяців тому

    This was a great podcast 👍
    You touched on it lightly, but I think it factors into the 15-minute, reloading time.
    And that is the signature the weapon.
    Tremendous amount of smoke was generated by this mortar. So much so, it was guaranteed to give away your position. So the panzer grenadiers, would move with the unit, after firing every round.
    Hence, the 15-minute reloading time.
    Just saying..... ...
    And it was the ultimate bunker-buster on tracks!!!💥

  • @baizen1
    @baizen1 4 роки тому +3

    Rate of fire: 4 shots per hour.
    Well, guess this kitty isnt making it to WT :(

    • @uteriel282
      @uteriel282 4 роки тому +1

      you still have the brumbär and the sig33b.
      only 150mm instead of 380mm but still more than enough to get rid of anything in your way lol.

    • @elbucho8867
      @elbucho8867 4 роки тому

      Also KV 2 but is ain’t the same.

  • @mikus4242
    @mikus4242 4 роки тому +19

    Another case of massive effort for a basically ineffective weapon.

    • @scorchclasstitan6727
      @scorchclasstitan6727 3 роки тому

      Mike Kent I think the 42,000,000 Russians would tend to disagree about it being “ineffective”

    • @mikus4242
      @mikus4242 3 роки тому +1

      @@scorchclasstitan6727 Based on the video, I doubt a half a million Russians faced one of these.

    • @scorchclasstitan6727
      @scorchclasstitan6727 3 роки тому

      Mike Kent yea and the allies are saints right ? Because you were there right ?

    • @mikus4242
      @mikus4242 3 роки тому +1

      @@scorchclasstitan6727 How you got that out of my comment is beyond me.....

    • @scorchclasstitan6727
      @scorchclasstitan6727 3 роки тому

      Mike Kent because you people are that much of a cliche that you think the Germans fell in a matter of hours after they invaded plane .
      You are *literally* a walking racial problem .

  • @gammarotor
    @gammarotor 2 роки тому

    5:44 Morale effect. Although having a 38cm shell coming at you could change your morals. Thank you for this most excellent video!

  • @robertascii5498
    @robertascii5498 4 роки тому

    Excellent video. A true definition of A Beast.

  • @powerslave6944
    @powerslave6944 4 роки тому +4

    Can I borrow this Sturmtiger to destroy💥 my neighbors house? 🏡

  • @nexus8917
    @nexus8917 4 роки тому +5

    Simple, point it at Warsaw.

  • @lukasalmeidasan
    @lukasalmeidasan 4 роки тому

    Nice video!