Bat For Lashes playing Bruce Springsteen cover at the Spitz

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @annaoy
    @annaoy 16 років тому +1

    it's insane how good this is

  • @MJRLeegsmaster
    @MJRLeegsmaster 15 років тому

    This woman is aching with desire. I think she's actually crying at the end - I'm in love...
    Thanks for this priceless post!

  • @icicle83
    @icicle83 16 років тому

    I heard this song on Buzz Jr. last night on my way home and her voice really enhances these lyrics that Bruce delivers oh so well, but she turned it up a knotch! I like a lot! I hope to hear more of them down here in South Florida

  • @nocrezvitus
    @nocrezvitus 17 років тому

    Why do people nitpick? A wonderful voice- amazing musicianship and a sound that songwriters like myself crave for. The song itself is one of my fave Bruce songs and I love this version. They've done something different. And she's singing it with so much conviction and passion, almost as if the song has become her. As for comparisons to whoever, every musician is bound to sound like someone else, nobody 'invents' anything, they just build on their influences :-)

  • @ashc241185
    @ashc241185 16 років тому

    I would agree actually, I have Bruce's version and this one. I first heard this version about a year ago when I was driving home from my ex-girlfriends. This version is such a beautiful song. her voice is cutting and the melody is haunting and chilling. I was almost mezmerized. With all due respect to Bruce for coming up with this song originally, but this cover is something different, it's special, and it's better.

  • @olliegreaves678
    @olliegreaves678 17 років тому

    amazing cover took the song and brought it into a different genre of music 5 stars!! ;D

  • @TurtleRocker12
    @TurtleRocker12 17 років тому

    "Er, no idea what the cover was. Any ideas?"
    I'M ON FIRE!
    it was a top ten in the charts
    fer cryin' out loud and this version for an amatuer is pretty awesome

  • @ashc241185
    @ashc241185 15 років тому +1

    No disrespect to Bruce, he's great and his half time show at the superbowl was awesome, but very rarely (and I'm not often a fan of covers) someone comes along and improves on an original. My opinion is that this is one of those songs, and it's fine if you don't agree, but lets not turn it into an argument, just enjoy the music which ever version you prefer.

  • @malfattimusic2844
    @malfattimusic2844 16 років тому

    awesome video i dig it

  • @scottjhnsn
    @scottjhnsn 17 років тому

    this is the way covers are supposed to sound like....completely different and fresh! natasha did a fab job because i never liked this song....but it sounds much more magical.

  • @turoasaur
    @turoasaur 18 років тому

    its good to have opinions!

  • @shyncoll
    @shyncoll 14 років тому

    it's called I'm On Fire.

  • @dinydoodle
    @dinydoodle 15 років тому

    You're right, Cash just did a cover.

  • @enyafreak2007
    @enyafreak2007 15 років тому

    No, it is a Bruce Springsteen song originally!

  • @Posh_Cat
    @Posh_Cat 15 років тому

    the recording quality isnt great, but i like this one
    i've heard the one on the album (its a bonus track) and it sounds soo much better

  • @aurynnyrua
    @aurynnyrua 15 років тому

    the song's "i'm on fire"

  • @drunkenchipmunk
    @drunkenchipmunk 17 років тому

    People who are comparing Bat For Lashes to Cat Power and claiming England "does not produce" - perhaps, instead of listening to a cover which is bound to be generic in some way because of the very fact that it is a COVER, you should listen to some of Natasha's original material. And stop relying on comparisons to one of the few internationally recognised female indie stars you've mustered up.

  • @dinydoodle
    @dinydoodle 15 років тому

    I think this is originally a Johnny Cash song.

  • @tulletobak
    @tulletobak 16 років тому

    "i'm on fire"

  • @monkeyguitarist
    @monkeyguitarist 17 років тому

    I'M ON FIRE, weird version.

  • @TheSpaceOpera
    @TheSpaceOpera 15 років тому

    The song I'm on Fire by Bruce Springsteen has nothing to do with the Johnny Cash song.'Ring of Fire'.

  • @BreFgt
    @BreFgt 15 років тому

    lots of people do lots of covers of songs, but that doesn't mean they're trying to 'be' someone else. they all put their own spin on it (or at least try to).
    this cover sounds NOTHING like the tori amos cover..

  • @drunkenchipmunk
    @drunkenchipmunk 17 років тому

    It's not always so good to spam them in places they're not appreciated.

  • @ch473
    @ch473 17 років тому

    dammit it's "Skull" not "soul"

  • @mrbrightside06
    @mrbrightside06 16 років тому

    better than the original? i respect your opinion but............ really?

  • @AardvarkAdventure
    @AardvarkAdventure 17 років тому

    Musically really good, cool interpretation...but I gotta say, the lyrics creep me out with the genders reversed. I thought the line "hey little girl is your daddy home?" was a little weird to begin, but it's even stranger this way.
    Also why change it from "skull" to "soul?" I've seen it written that way before but that's definitely not the lyric. Oh well!

  • @godfather4377
    @godfather4377 16 років тому

    Springsteen > This Shit

  • @danlyttle
    @danlyttle 15 років тому

    u cannot beat the boss so there's no point in tryin!

  • @TurtleRocker12
    @TurtleRocker12 15 років тому

    how is bruce's version not haunting?
    and how is it not better than this bar trash

  • @Amblu
    @Amblu 17 років тому

    Don't like it, prefer Springsteen.