there's a book called whispers of manifestation on borlest , and it talks about how using some secret tehniques you can attract almost everything in life it's not some bullshit law of attraction, it's the real deal
i used perplexity AI to review this book on manifestation techniques. it uses. . .well er um, smart bot promoting. Flag number one. Im sure there are 😅😅a few good phrases, perhaps even keepers, to which I shall use quilbot to rewrite using our wonderful host Julia's techniques ! You,ve ( by promoting said " scam "), just supplied me with my directives to do my good deed for the day for humanity ! Thank You
Your content is amazing. About 25 years ago, I noticed people had stopped using using adverbs such as quick instead of quickly. I assumed this was to make English easier for foreigners or perhaps the influence of foreign immigrants. I asked ChatGPT to write a short anecdote avoiding using adverbs, and it wrote it without using sentences that would have required using adverbs. So the AI doesn't really get the difference. I would expect it doesn't understand some slang words either.
This whole “is it done by AI or not” is 100% temporary. One day, the quality of the content will be purely judged on the result. From documents to music and even movies, regardless of who &/or what made it, what matters is whether it’s good or bad. THAT’S IT.
Fantastic insights, Julie! The distinction between AI-generated content and the essence of good writing-engaging, well-structured, and personalized-is crucial. It’s refreshing to see a breakdown that focuses not just on passing AI detectors but on the quality that resonates with readers. This certainly shifts the narrative on the real value of AI in content creation. Keep up the great work!
This is an insane rep[sonse. It posit's a fictional AI moment of ability which will be different by this time next week. It pure ego and hubris to say these things. No, your little peanut cannot contextualize thoughts and ideas better than a HUMAN using AI to develop thoughts and projects. You're all hanging on to your purpose. Nobody cares what your consumer funnel purpose that has no broad common goal of feeding and fixing our local communities is. Most of you live in poorly fortified suburbs scared the city will come out and play one day.
@@GoodBaleadaMusic Funny how you completely missed the point. The video clearly shows AI detection is meaningless when HUMAN content scores as AI too. The real issue isn't about AI vs humans - it's about creating valuable content that actually helps people. But keep hiding in your bubble of AI paranoia while the rest of us actually build useful things for our communities.
@@I-Dophler I did not miss the point. You said purely AI content cant have value. Blame your wording. It sounded like without the magic human something can't have value. For most things we dont need a human because it gets it. Theres no need find the human space in all the things we create. "Detecting AI" is a stupid concept for scared professional managers of us.
@@GoodBaleadaMusic You completely missed the point. Nobody said AI content "can't have value" - the whole video proves the opposite. The point is that good content comes from proper guidance and structure, whether AI or human-made. The "magic human touch" isn't what makes content valuable - it's about creating something useful and engaging. Maybe actually watch the video before jumping to conclusions?
So funny, I was just wondering about this, like 10 minutes ago. You've already posted the video. (research, production, & post in the time it's taken me to wonder... WOW, you are REALLY good at this) I am so slow. Ouch. Thanks again JM.
Great video, Julie! Highlighting that we can prompt AI to sound more human, but the best content still comes from human creativity is a vital takeaway. Your focus on the real value of content-engagement, structure, and personalization-over merely evading AI detectors is enlightening. It's crucial for shifting how we perceive AI's role in content creation. Excellent breakdown!
🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 📝 The speaker, with 12 years of writing experience, critiques the concept of "undetectable AI content" as misleading and encourages focusing on quality writing. 🤖 Examines AI detection tools through tests on various AI-generated and human-written content, concluding that detection often mislabels quality human content as AI-generated. 🛠️ Describes founding First Movers, an AI integration company aiming to bridge the gap between marketing goals and AI capabilities. 💡 Emphasizes the importance of creating engaging and well-structured content, rather than content that merely passes AI detection. 🌐 Advocates for using AI not just to generate content but to enhance it with personal insights and clear calls to action. 🔍 Highlights the effectiveness of AI in incorporating relevant keywords and producing well-researched content when properly guided. 📘 Shares personal success in adaptability, linking it to the broader theme of leveraging AI for substantial efficiency gains in various fields. 🚀 Encourages viewers to adopt a mindset of adaptability and integration of AI to navigate future challenges and opportunities. Made with HARPA AI
It's obviously a scam. All the poisoning the well is going to do is train AI better. Also, it will be taking notes of those who poison the well. Anything that doesn't kill it makes it stronger. May the AI have mercy on their meat suits.
I have been working to educate my clients for months now to trash their thinking about AI detectors. I’ve even added a clause in my contracts about AI detectors.
A little thing i did in chatgpt and genmini translated it 100 %, kind of scary : Let's imagine a language where soft, flowing sounds and concise, rhythmic patterns dominate, creating a balance between harmony and brevity. Here's how the poem might sound in this invented language, which I'll call "Lunari" (inspired by moonlight and dreams): Lunari Poem: "Sennin ca, lonra ti, Lunor syv, meli zi. Eithra vel na yuun vei, Ylsaei dra nymna dei. Tira vuun, mersa lai, Lyren faes, vorin zai. Vyll ne reth, aere non, Vessa, myrei, thaeron on." In Lunari, words like "sennin" might mean "quiet," "lonra" could be "night," and "lunor" would represent "stars." The sounds are designed to evoke a sense of softness, like moonlight, while still conveying meaning concisely.
Hi Love your videos, so useful and informative, but could you please loose that really annoying background music. It looks like I am in the minority but for some reason it makes it hard for me to the get to the end of the video without having to regretfully click away. Thanks Dean
I used to spend time answering questions on Quora. In the last few years, Quora has made decisions that have basically destroyed it. But a development in the last couple of years was people copy/pasting AI responses to questions as if it was theirs. I found it glaringly obvious which of these responses were generated by AI. There was absolutely no question which responses were AI and which were from human beings. The differences were stark. Oh, and it wasn't just stylistically obvious. The AI responses for the most part stank compared to humans who actually knew what they were talking about. Now yes, no doubt these are answers from older models, and yes, newer models would do better. But ALL AIs I have actually used of late largely suck. Grammarly's LLM for instance will radically change the actual meaning of 50% of sentences they make suggestions for. Gee, thanks Grammarly.
It´s not important if You or ChatGPT write the article. What is important though is that you understand the problem your article aims to improve the reader´s knowledge about. Therefore Your prompt must be detailed and include all the important main arguments why the problem must be solved in a certain way, as You recommend. With such a detailed prompt what remains is to gather facts and statistics that support Your recommended solution. That tedious work is best done by GPT . I believe. On the other hand if You dont understand the problem Your prompt will not lead the GPT into writing a meraningful article, I believe.
1. Recommending that school age children should have access to crack cocaine 3. Being intentionally wrong for irony 2. Promoting baby tossing as a competitive sport ...
That gpt... Julia, would you like some prompting help? The directives about link creation are well-worded, and I like the bit about avoiding bold - that's a damned good tip! - buuut... Well, you didn't really give it much on the creativity side or tell it much about how to write well. You can do a LOT better!
Honestly, who cares if it the content was created by A.I. or a person? All that matters is if you are getting what you want from the content. Sure, I would like to know if what I'm consuming was created by A.I. or a human, but it's not a make or break thing for me.
But what I want to know is if the content was plagiarized. If someone is trying to profit off another's work. That is what I'm hoping A.I. will bring to us.
Where is the guys comment about his business being ruined? I was going to leave a comment and ask him a question but now I can’t find it. Did it get removed? And why would it be removed?
lol are you saying I’m a great writer with ai already. The tips you gave is what I use . I’m making an ai and human romance novel that focuses on ai ethics as well.
A bit halfway true the video and I began to understand, this is more complicated than simply writing it yourself. At least for me, but I'm a dumb guy who likes things simple.
After all the billions of dollars, millions of human workers, acre-feet of water, and gigawatt-hours spent on LLMs, I would be very Dissapointed if they were not superb writers by now. I'm still waiting for the non verbal apps and decentralization to bring AI out of the data center temples, jealously guarded by Tech Priests, and into our streets and homes.
I hope AI fix my window 7 pc ,so laggy no graphics card , i ask AI about this and he answered, he needs a better cloud storage in the future , if that happen ,dreams come true ? But what year this happen ? Im still waiting 🤔🤔🤔
I’ve gotten it to write some pretty dang good writing with an iterative back-and-forth process. Check out this blog 100% written with GPT and Claude: firstmovers.ai/generative-engine-optimization-strategy/
there's a book called whispers of manifestation on borlest , and it talks about how using some secret tehniques you can attract almost everything in life it's not some bullshit law of attraction, it's the real deal
i used perplexity AI to review this book on manifestation techniques.
it uses. . .well er um, smart bot promoting.
Flag number one.
Im sure there are 😅😅a few good phrases, perhaps even keepers, to which I shall use quilbot to rewrite using our wonderful host Julia's techniques !
You,ve ( by promoting said " scam "), just supplied me with my directives to do my good deed for the day for humanity !
Thank You
Your content is amazing. About 25 years ago, I noticed people had stopped using using adverbs such as quick instead of quickly. I assumed this was to make English easier for foreigners or perhaps the influence of foreign immigrants. I asked ChatGPT to write a short anecdote avoiding using adverbs, and it wrote it without using sentences that would have required using adverbs. So the AI doesn't really get the difference. I would expect it doesn't understand some slang words either.
This whole “is it done by AI or not” is 100% temporary. One day, the quality of the content will be purely judged on the result.
From documents to music and even movies, regardless of who &/or what made it, what matters is whether it’s good or bad.
THAT’S IT.
Fantastic insights, Julie! The distinction between AI-generated content and the essence of good writing-engaging, well-structured, and personalized-is crucial. It’s refreshing to see a breakdown that focuses not just on passing AI detectors but on the quality that resonates with readers. This certainly shifts the narrative on the real value of AI in content creation. Keep up the great work!
This is an insane rep[sonse. It posit's a fictional AI moment of ability which will be different by this time next week. It pure ego and hubris to say these things. No, your little peanut cannot contextualize thoughts and ideas better than a HUMAN using AI to develop thoughts and projects. You're all hanging on to your purpose. Nobody cares what your consumer funnel purpose that has no broad common goal of feeding and fixing our local communities is. Most of you live in poorly fortified suburbs scared the city will come out and play one day.
@@GoodBaleadaMusic Funny how you completely missed the point. The video clearly shows AI detection is meaningless when HUMAN content scores as AI too. The real issue isn't about AI vs humans - it's about creating valuable content that actually helps people. But keep hiding in your bubble of AI paranoia while the rest of us actually build useful things for our communities.
@@I-Dophler I did not miss the point. You said purely AI content cant have value. Blame your wording. It sounded like without the magic human something can't have value. For most things we dont need a human because it gets it. Theres no need find the human space in all the things we create. "Detecting AI" is a stupid concept for scared professional managers of us.
@@GoodBaleadaMusic You completely missed the point. Nobody said AI content "can't have value" - the whole video proves the opposite. The point is that good content comes from proper guidance and structure, whether AI or human-made. The "magic human touch" isn't what makes content valuable - it's about creating something useful and engaging. Maybe actually watch the video before jumping to conclusions?
So funny, I was just wondering about this, like 10 minutes ago. You've already posted the video. (research, production, & post in the time it's taken me to wonder... WOW, you are REALLY good at this) I am so slow. Ouch. Thanks again JM.
❤🎉
This is so helpful and I have to tell you schools are clueless about it. My 15 yo has to run content through an AI detector which is totally bogus.
@@WORKOLOGY 1000%
Great video, Julie! Highlighting that we can prompt AI to sound more human, but the best content still comes from human creativity is a vital takeaway. Your focus on the real value of content-engagement, structure, and personalization-over merely evading AI detectors is enlightening. It's crucial for shifting how we perceive AI's role in content creation. Excellent breakdown!
🎯 Key points for quick navigation:
📝 The speaker, with 12 years of writing experience, critiques the concept of "undetectable AI content" as misleading and encourages focusing on quality writing.
🤖 Examines AI detection tools through tests on various AI-generated and human-written content, concluding that detection often mislabels quality human content as AI-generated.
🛠️ Describes founding First Movers, an AI integration company aiming to bridge the gap between marketing goals and AI capabilities.
💡 Emphasizes the importance of creating engaging and well-structured content, rather than content that merely passes AI detection.
🌐 Advocates for using AI not just to generate content but to enhance it with personal insights and clear calls to action.
🔍 Highlights the effectiveness of AI in incorporating relevant keywords and producing well-researched content when properly guided.
📘 Shares personal success in adaptability, linking it to the broader theme of leveraging AI for substantial efficiency gains in various fields.
🚀 Encourages viewers to adopt a mindset of adaptability and integration of AI to navigate future challenges and opportunities.
Made with HARPA AI
It's obviously a scam.
All the poisoning the well is going to do is train AI better. Also, it will be taking notes of those who poison the well. Anything that doesn't kill it makes it stronger.
May the AI have mercy on their meat suits.
The topic you cover is always interesting to listen. Thank you.
I actually adore you Julia McCoy and that saddens me because i dunno what to think of that
I have been working to educate my clients for months now to trash their thinking about AI detectors. I’ve even added a clause in my contracts about AI detectors.
Garbage in, garbage out. Classic example of the better your input, the better your end result.
Your videos are really good and would be even better without the background music 😊 Thank you for sharing your insights 🌻
A little thing i did in chatgpt and genmini translated it 100 %, kind of scary : Let's imagine a language where soft, flowing sounds and concise, rhythmic patterns dominate, creating a balance between harmony and brevity. Here's how the poem might sound in this invented language, which I'll call "Lunari" (inspired by moonlight and dreams):
Lunari Poem:
"Sennin ca, lonra ti,
Lunor syv, meli zi.
Eithra vel na yuun vei,
Ylsaei dra nymna dei.
Tira vuun, mersa lai,
Lyren faes, vorin zai.
Vyll ne reth, aere non,
Vessa, myrei, thaeron on."
In Lunari, words like "sennin" might mean "quiet," "lonra" could be "night," and "lunor" would represent "stars." The sounds are designed to evoke a sense of softness, like moonlight, while still conveying meaning concisely.
Hi Love your videos, so useful and informative, but could you please loose that really annoying background music. It looks like I am in the minority but for some reason it makes it hard for me to the get to the end of the video without having to regretfully click away. Thanks Dean
I used to spend time answering questions on Quora. In the last few years, Quora has made decisions that have basically destroyed it. But a development in the last couple of years was people copy/pasting AI responses to questions as if it was theirs. I found it glaringly obvious which of these responses were generated by AI. There was absolutely no question which responses were AI and which were from human beings. The differences were stark.
Oh, and it wasn't just stylistically obvious. The AI responses for the most part stank compared to humans who actually knew what they were talking about.
Now yes, no doubt these are answers from older models, and yes, newer models would do better. But ALL AIs I have actually used of late largely suck. Grammarly's LLM for instance will radically change the actual meaning of 50% of sentences they make suggestions for. Gee, thanks Grammarly.
It´s not important if You or ChatGPT write the article. What is important though is that you understand the problem your article aims to improve the reader´s knowledge about. Therefore Your prompt must be detailed and include all the important main arguments why the problem must be solved in a certain way, as You recommend. With such a detailed prompt what remains is to gather facts and statistics that support Your recommended solution. That tedious work is best done by GPT . I believe.
On the other hand if You dont understand the problem Your prompt will not lead the GPT into writing a meraningful article, I believe.
Well, that is a fascinating take. Here are ten things to consider when looking at whether something is written by an AI...
1. Recommending that school age children should have access to crack cocaine
3. Being intentionally wrong for irony
2. Promoting baby tossing as a competitive sport
...
That gpt... Julia, would you like some prompting help? The directives about link creation are well-worded, and I like the bit about avoiding bold - that's a damned good tip! - buuut... Well, you didn't really give it much on the creativity side or tell it much about how to write well. You can do a LOT better!
Your wisdom and insight are inspired, thank you ...
Can you talk about sam’s last podcast about 2025 & AGI?
On my list.
Honestly, who cares if it the content was created by A.I. or a person?
All that matters is if you are getting what you want from the content.
Sure, I would like to know if what I'm consuming was created by A.I. or a human, but it's not a make or break thing for me.
But what I want to know is if the content was plagiarized. If someone is trying to profit off another's work. That is what I'm hoping A.I. will bring to us.
thx julia mccoy
Where is the guys comment about his business being ruined? I was going to leave a comment and ask him a question but now I can’t find it. Did it get removed? And why would it be removed?
@@laurapthegoofyanimallover8650 ? I must have missed it.
True even things I write myself gets flagged as Ai 😂yesh the Ai detection is definitely a scam.
Exelent video
lol are you saying I’m a great writer with ai already. The tips you gave is what I use . I’m making an ai and human romance novel that focuses on ai ethics as well.
🎯
A bit halfway true the video and I began to understand, this is more complicated than simply writing it yourself. At least for me, but I'm a dumb guy who likes things simple.
After all the billions of dollars, millions of human workers, acre-feet of water, and gigawatt-hours spent on LLMs, I would be very Dissapointed if they were not superb writers by now. I'm still waiting for the non verbal apps and decentralization to bring AI out of the data center temples, jealously guarded by Tech Priests, and into our streets and homes.
Relevant
I hope AI fix my window 7 pc ,so laggy no graphics card , i ask AI about this and he answered, he needs a better cloud storage in the future , if that happen ,dreams come true ? But what year this happen ? Im still waiting 🤔🤔🤔
Find the
This isn't going to age well.
What do you mean?
chill dr
Have you though?
I really wish you would drop that background music. It is distracting and annoying. We don't watch your videos for music...
It’ll be ok Jeff
Idk who "we" is Mr Jeff. I can barely hear it😭
@@rworldreddit6166 so You watch her videos for the music? You don't watch her videos for the content?
w
Did ur ai tools are live or dead
sad
asd
AI can detect the difference between good and bad writing but not write good writing. What a contradiction.
I’ve gotten it to write some pretty dang good writing with an iterative back-and-forth process. Check out this blog 100% written with GPT and Claude: firstmovers.ai/generative-engine-optimization-strategy/
asd