the bell work is literal anti science propaganda and the “evidence” they provide is from starving african countries which held IQ tests in english while they didnt speak english. Italians immigrants in america from the 1900s had an IQ of 70 and were discriminated by that reasoning. Race is not a thing there are no separate human races but only one humanity
No. It’s an incredibly ignorant and racist book. It ignores systemic racism in testing and data collection and completely supports the idea of genetic intellectual differences between races wtf
the three fifths compromise wasn't racist in the way it appears to be. the problem is that it gave slave states more political representation, even though the slaves being counted had no civil rights
True. There is nothing inherently racist about slavery either, but the immense amount of black slaves was a direct cause of the rise of white supremacy ideology, which is the root of all racism. Before colonization of the americas, there really was no such thing as racism. Slavery was based on nationality, and the color of your skin did not matter before the idea that some colors were better than others.
You picked out an irrelevant point in the video and tried to attack it, only to be wrong about it. This is what it means to be complicit with racism; to be a racist.
What ratio white man to Black man did the fraction of 3/5th make equal too??? 🙂. Because people really need to know WHAT the breakdown of the fraction 3 Fifths of a White man meant other than the partial definition you gave
And why do you think that is? That’s because black babies were banned from mainstream competition, in the first place they had to have their own competition.
@@AT-gu8by perhaps you're misremembering the context of this era? "Mainstream" was segregated by race like sports are by gender. The notion that the NAACP was not "mainstream" in the black community is absurd. If anything, they were attempting to define it... For more on this subject I suggest Marcus Garvey, his perspective might provide a bit more Historical context and is interesting to learn about. Cheers!
You picked out an irrelevant point in the video and tried to attack it, only to be wrong about it. This is what it means to be complicit with racism; to be a racist.
You forgot to mention the beginning of racism. The first laws based on “blood purity” which laid the groundwork for racism is Limpieza de sangre in the reconquista from 1449. The “new Christian” were discriminated based on the fact that they were “pure blooded” Christians and not “mixed” from Jewish/Muslim blood. This also helped build the Cast system in the new world and the racism towards African american.
@daniele.3361Christianity is a proselytizing religion, it’s just illogical for it to develop a system of “foundational” and “lesser converts”. Being a Christian isn’t in your genes, it is a religious answer to the question of human life, and requires dedication and study to the Bible’s principles.
If there was some type of Wakanda civilization somewhere near the Congo equatorial region say 400 years ago they would be doing similiar things and have similiar ideas, opinions also- not everyone but enough would bc we are, nearly identical after all - no differences at all, nothing to see here. It irks me when wokies say theres no such thing as race then in the next breath add except when theres social racism or some such nonsense - the truth is many sided as many as there are ppl trying to explain their take. Proper Education Always Corrects Errors
Mf there was a civilisation in Africa over 500 years ago in fact on of the first were in Africa by blacks called the Kush empire 5000 years ago and no they had no racism. Just as the ghanan empire and the mali empire did not have which existed over 500 years ago. Just show your ignorance by saying “wakanda”. Imagine someone saying the starks of game of thrones instead of pointing to the holy roman empire or such but to answer your question. There are no races in the way racists see it. There is no significant difference between any human besides skin, hair and eye colour but we still have these differences in colour which do not affect humans at all. Thus we say there are no races because biologists do not even have the term race but only species which is when a group of living beings is separated by their closest other group and that separation is in form of not being able to breed. Also european racism is different than anything before it. Xenophobia was always a thing but european racism not. The first racist laws were implemented in spain 1449 called Limpieza de sangre which happend during the reconquista and discriminated between “old Christians” and “new Christian” that converted from Islam or Judaism. The reasoning why they did it was because the old Christians had “pure Christian blood” while the “new Christian were mixed bloods”. Lets not even mention how stupid that concept is because marrocans and iberians are genetically really similar and the stupidity in general but the fact that most of the “new Christians” were native in Iberia just as long as the “old Christians” most converted during the islamic expansion. The same laws were used in the new worlds by columbus to create the cast system which was the beginning of Racism and white superiority and no nothing similar happend ever in history.
@@TheYolo20 who said there were no civilization or civilized ppl in Africa? Every continent besides Antarctica had them. Ppl get around and they did in all kinds of settings. What I meant by prehistory is written history that remains for ppl - Stonehenge is prehistory until someone wrote about it but it's obviously there likewise there's campsites ten years ago that left a fire circle, charcoal - what about it? There's hardly anything that's not made of stone that survives from tropical regions bc the environment is harsh on biological material so it's rare to find wood, leather, animal products or Pringles bc no one could eat just 1 and left nothing but stories of how delicious they were likewise there are clues from language and the oral history of continuously shared stories which are usually taken with a grain of salt. Egypt w it's pyramids bear proof of high culture and antiquity but if it wasn't a dry place little papyrus or biological material would remain. Savvy?
@@TheYolo20 to say there was no realization ppl were different is patently wrong - every group of humans upon meeting others has biases immediately noticeable as condescendingly separate just from their self perception which is expressed as ego - the very names of tribes highlight this as well as customs - when a ppl refers to themselves as THE people, original ppl, Gods chosen ppl etc it's hinted at that others are not as fully human as they themselves and biases begin from the thinking to the actions which might be recognized as prejudice and yr right racism may not present itself as a concern even though other attributes or reasons may be the impetus for delineating themselves - it's impossible to speak for everyone and thank God for the outliers who see the spirit is more important than the vessel but u can have twins who's attitudes separate them over details that are are unseen ppl seem to be awfully aware of their own worth and others faults even when living among each other they might arrange marriages or forbid certain hookups for example - it's beautiful when ppl don't treat others as unclean, without merit or lacking in other ways. When Han Chinese say their kingdom is the center of the world thats implying they are the best so someone else is second best and not looking Han Chinese is the quickest sign of difference so it was definitely noticed. We could break it down more but I'd rather leave on a positive note - a bunch of refreshing drinks are on the counter ok they look different, they taste different but it's the water which makes them all satisfying - it is variety which is the flavor, the spice of life - we should celebrate our similarities and differences while unastanin we have came full circle around the globe uniting the huge tribe of humanity- it hasn't always been easy but DNA has shown that without doubt we are one blood 1🖤✌️✌🏻✌🏽 Respect- Proper Education Always Corrects Errors
@@TheYolo20 also I should've mentioned what I meant by prehistory wasn't no history or civilization but no written history, no accounts remain except oral history or that worked into the stone bc in a tropical environment often nothing of biological origin will remain so papyrus wood leather etc is decomposed no longer available - we know Egypt was there by it's pyramids - it' is still and there's writing to collaborate certain things bc they lived in a predominantly dry climate there's some evidence remaining mostly by hiding things in a constant dry dark place and even then it's a crapshoot to find anything - Stonehenge is ancient, they had civilization but no written language so I'd call their civilization prehistory. I hope that helps -
The masked guy in a room by himself should be disqualified in any field of science😂😂
A masked student in a room by himself... we should be studying him.
Good way of avoiding the videos point! Love your take :)
@@bammmkaboom63 Should be listening to an idiot who wears a mask during a video conference?
They might have a smidgen of decency to not infect people entering the room later
The Bell Curve is excellent book
chill out bigot
the bell work is literal anti science propaganda and the “evidence” they provide is from starving african countries which held IQ tests in english while they didnt speak english. Italians immigrants in america from the 1900s had an IQ of 70 and were discriminated by that reasoning. Race is not a thing there are no separate human races but only one humanity
No. It’s an incredibly ignorant and racist book. It ignores systemic racism in testing and data collection and completely supports the idea of genetic intellectual differences between races wtf
You think so? Why is it a good book? Does it confirm what you already believed?
We are supposed to mix it up.
Those early scientists were spot on
😂😂😂😂 it’s a religion for y’all!!!
We was White and Sheeit!!!
Qute enlightening,
Perhaps racism is a subset of caste systems
Thank you for this excellent synopsis!
Thank you for sharing this :)
This is all real
Did the students consent to have their facial reactions to this material in the video ? I feel like it would have been really easy to crop out
Truth
Thanks for the upload, I love the history of science
I don't. It's pretty fucked up.
@@TheBatmanNerd I love history if we don’t know our past it repeats itself.
@@TheHoodVoice2024 Silly little Bantu.
the three fifths compromise wasn't racist in the way it appears to be. the problem is that it gave slave states more political representation, even though the slaves being counted had no civil rights
fact check: true.
True. There is nothing inherently racist about slavery either, but the immense amount of black slaves was a direct cause of the rise of white supremacy ideology, which is the root of all racism. Before colonization of the americas, there really was no such thing as racism. Slavery was based on nationality, and the color of your skin did not matter before the idea that some colors were better than others.
You picked out an irrelevant point in the video and tried to attack it, only to be wrong about it. This is what it means to be complicit with racism; to be a racist.
What ratio white man to Black man did the fraction of 3/5th make equal too??? 🙂.
Because people really need to know WHAT the breakdown of the fraction 3 Fifths of a White man meant other than the partial definition you gave
@@SaintGuapo. From what I know, the Romans didn't care who they enslaved.
you say "non-white children are banned from entry" but did not acknowledge that the NAACP held their own "Better Baby" competitions?
And why do you think that is? That’s because black babies were banned from mainstream competition, in the first place they had to have their own competition.
@@AT-gu8by perhaps you're misremembering the context of this era? "Mainstream" was segregated by race like sports are by gender. The notion that the NAACP was not "mainstream" in the black community is absurd. If anything, they were attempting to define it... For more on this subject I suggest Marcus Garvey, his perspective might provide a bit more Historical context and is interesting to learn about. Cheers!
@@everybodyshook Man you ended that like you were working for PBS Kids.
You picked out an irrelevant point in the video and tried to attack it, only to be wrong about it. This is what it means to be complicit with racism; to be a racist.
@@everybodyshookmainstream in the black community??? Black peoples are a part of the mainstream. There is no equity in racism.
You forgot to mention the beginning of racism. The first laws based on “blood purity” which laid the groundwork for racism is Limpieza de sangre in the reconquista from 1449. The “new Christian” were discriminated based on the fact that they were “pure blooded” Christians and not “mixed” from Jewish/Muslim blood. This also helped build the Cast system in the new world and the racism towards African american.
@daniele.3361 Whats wrong with racism?
@daniele.3361do racists really seek these videos out ? You are asking what is wrong with a caste system?
@daniele.3361Christianity is a proselytizing religion, it’s just illogical for it to develop a system of “foundational” and “lesser converts”.
Being a Christian isn’t in your genes, it is a religious answer to the question of human life, and requires dedication and study to the Bible’s principles.
@@TheYolo20 Racism comes from the Talmud which was written by black people.
@@PatrickFitzgerald88 🤨
Can evil be undone?
Yes.
If there was some type of Wakanda civilization somewhere near the Congo equatorial region say 400 years ago they would be doing similiar things and have similiar ideas, opinions also- not everyone but enough would bc we are, nearly identical after all - no differences at all, nothing to see here. It irks me when wokies say theres no such thing as race then in the next breath add except when theres social racism or some such nonsense - the truth is many sided as many as there are ppl trying to explain their take. Proper Education Always Corrects Errors
Mf there was a civilisation in Africa over 500 years ago in fact on of the first were in Africa by blacks called the Kush empire 5000 years ago and no they had no racism. Just as the ghanan empire and the mali empire did not have which existed over 500 years ago. Just show your ignorance by saying “wakanda”. Imagine someone saying the starks of game of thrones instead of pointing to the holy roman empire or such but to answer your question. There are no races in the way racists see it. There is no significant difference between any human besides skin, hair and eye colour but we still have these differences in colour which do not affect humans at all. Thus we say there are no races because biologists do not even have the term race but only species which is when a group of living beings is separated by their closest other group and that separation is in form of not being able to breed. Also european racism is different than anything before it. Xenophobia was always a thing but european racism not. The first racist laws were implemented in spain 1449 called Limpieza de sangre which happend during the reconquista and discriminated between “old Christians” and “new Christian” that converted from Islam or Judaism. The reasoning why they did it was because the old Christians had “pure Christian blood” while the “new Christian were mixed bloods”. Lets not even mention how stupid that concept is because marrocans and iberians are genetically really similar and the stupidity in general but the fact that most of the “new Christians” were native in Iberia just as long as the “old Christians” most converted during the islamic expansion. The same laws were used in the new worlds by columbus to create the cast system which was the beginning of Racism and white superiority and no nothing similar happend ever in history.
@@TheYolo20 who said there were no civilization or civilized ppl in Africa? Every continent besides Antarctica had them. Ppl get around and they did in all kinds of settings. What I meant by prehistory is written history that remains for ppl - Stonehenge is prehistory until someone wrote about it but it's obviously there likewise there's campsites ten years ago that left a fire circle, charcoal - what about it? There's hardly anything that's not made of stone that survives from tropical regions bc the environment is harsh on biological material so it's rare to find wood, leather, animal products or Pringles bc no one could eat just 1 and left nothing but stories of how delicious they were likewise there are clues from language and the oral history of continuously shared stories which are usually taken with a grain of salt. Egypt w it's pyramids bear proof of high culture and antiquity but if it wasn't a dry place little papyrus or biological material would remain. Savvy?
@@TheYolo20 to say there was no realization ppl were different is patently wrong - every group of humans upon meeting others has biases immediately noticeable as condescendingly separate just from their self perception which is expressed as ego - the very names of tribes highlight this as well as customs - when a ppl refers to themselves as THE people, original ppl, Gods chosen ppl etc it's hinted at that others are not as fully human as they themselves and biases begin from the thinking to the actions which might be recognized as prejudice and yr right racism may not present itself as a concern even though other attributes or reasons may be the impetus for delineating themselves - it's impossible to speak for everyone and thank God for the outliers who see the spirit is more important than the vessel but u can have twins who's attitudes separate them over details that are are unseen ppl seem to be awfully aware of their own worth and others faults even when living among each other they might arrange marriages or forbid certain hookups for example - it's beautiful when ppl don't treat others as unclean, without merit or lacking in other ways. When Han Chinese say their kingdom is the center of the world thats implying they are the best so someone else is second best and not looking Han Chinese is the quickest sign of difference so it was definitely noticed. We could break it down more but I'd rather leave on a positive note - a bunch of refreshing drinks are on the counter ok they look different, they taste different but it's the water which makes them all satisfying - it is variety which is the flavor, the spice of life - we should celebrate our similarities and differences while unastanin we have came full circle around the globe uniting the huge tribe of humanity- it hasn't always been easy but DNA has shown that without doubt we are one blood 1🖤✌️✌🏻✌🏽 Respect- Proper Education Always Corrects Errors
@@TheYolo20 also I should've mentioned what I meant by prehistory wasn't no history or civilization but no written history, no accounts remain except oral history or that worked into the stone bc in a tropical environment often nothing of biological origin will remain so papyrus wood leather etc is decomposed no longer available - we know Egypt was there by it's pyramids - it' is still and there's writing to collaborate certain things bc they lived in a predominantly dry climate there's some evidence remaining mostly by hiding things in a constant dry dark place and even then it's a crapshoot to find anything - Stonehenge is ancient, they had civilization but no written language so I'd call their civilization prehistory. I hope that helps -
@@almightyyt2101 I never said that there was no realisation that ppl were different that is a blatant lie.