Ancient Egyptian Stone Working Drills & Boring Tools TECHNIQUES RE-EXAMINED
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- #ancientegyptiantools #experimentalarchaeology #drillingstone
Re-examining the work of Denys A Stocks and his interpretations of ancient Egyptian depictions of stone workers with the newer work from the Scientists Against Myths channel.
Ancient egyptian stone working tools, ancient Egyptian Core drilling, ancinet Egyptian vase making.
Using experimental archaeology and the archaeological record to shed new light on the artefacts and the processes of old. What were their tools and how exactly did they use them.
Some Experiments in Ancient Egyptian Stone Technology - Denys A. Stocks
from M. DOJČINOVIĆ
• Some Experiments in An...
I have mirrored this video with comments enabled
• Some Experiments in An...
Experiments in Egyptian Archaeology: Stoneworking Technology in Ancient Egypt By Denys A Stocks
www.academia.e...
Making Egyptian Drill Holes: Lost Ancient High Technology by Scientists Against Myths
• Making Egyptian Drill ...
Making a stone vase with primitive tools by Scientists Against Myths
• Making a stone vase wi...
What a great find! Fair play to this guy! Funny all these ancient alien ideas out there and this is the 1st vid I’ve ever seen show anything about drilling like this.
The ancient aliens meme is asinine, especially how they usually start with the giant rock piles as "evidence." Still there is a place for doubt that everything we find was in fact done by one culture or in one phase of a much older one. There is a case for at least two distinct industries visible in numerous objects aliens or no aliens. All of the most technically demanding vases that show 0.01 inch precision and symmetries you just can't get from freehand carving are found not just in Old Kingdom but in completely pre dynastic burials. These methods are sufficient to produce the wobblier versions mostly carved of softer stone but it looks much more like a dynastic attempt at recreating an older industry they never managed to match.
The drill was without doubt spun around. Otherwise you would not have that stone disc present on the shaft which would not only obstruct you but also slow you down. The stone disc is a gyroscopic shaft stabilizer. It has a high moment of inertia and if you were to only twist the drill back and forth it would work against you as you need to both accelerate and decelerate it for each time you change directions.
But when continuously rotating it in the same direction the spinning disc serves three important purposes.
1) The disc will store rotational energy maintaining the rotation and thereby keep the drill going at a steady pace.
2) The disc acts as a gyroscopic stabilizer, which stabilizes the shaft helping bore a very straight and even hole.
3) The mass of the disc helps keep it in place and applies downwards pressure which increases the drilling efficiency.
The guy showcasing his spinning technique with one hand is completely right BUT his replica has a somewhat important flaw. Namely the disc he is using is a tall cylinder which (while nice and heavy) has a much much lower moment of inertia compared to a disc of same mass but large radius and lower height. If he was to reconstruct that disc to be much wider the drill would become even more stable than it already is and would at the same time maintain its spinning motion better.
enjoying the new content you bring, always worth visiting this channel
Looks like a alien space ship, laser cutting tool to me mate, or maybe a free power tesla hidden tool thats holding us back from reaching our potential, blah blah. Love your scientific factual based explanations mate. 😊
What!? No lasers? No microwaves? No harmonic lifting?
What a dissappointment.
I would like him to explain how the clean circular cut boring holes in granite stone were made within the Saqqara pyramid?
@@ututheavenger I have a whole playlist of videos with how to explanations so to avoid noobish mistakes.
I have also cut with copper to replicate “giant circular saw marks” as well as “impossible” polishing.
The real question is why there is zero interest amongst the lost high technology community to do the same.
It’s almost as if they don’t care about the very things they make such a fuss over.
Nice work ! What you show is pretty well convincing when it comes how they performed their drilling.
School of Granite Drilling...
Made me spit out my coffee. Well done sir.
🤣
Good stuff dude, definitely subscribed and going to check out what else you got. Love your sass in the comments too, to the point and not taking any BS.
Thanks for the sub!
very good, thanks!
You have superb powers of observation, info retention, and recall.
Brill.
cool. i have never seen that before.
Even the hieroglyphs for the word drill are known? Slam dunk SGD.
Cool
Thanks amazing info as always
They may have used this on Calcite Jars. ( Calcite is very soft, you can cut it with a dull knife). as it says but they clearly used much more advanced tooling to cut and move the larger Granit stones. Ive been a mine owner for 22 years and have tried different methods at the mines and I really think they used sound to cut and move granit and basalts. Ganite and Basalt is MUCH harder.
I have demos drilling and cutting granite and basalt with copper. It works fine , I get over a third the cutting rate in granite by hand as a modern gangsaw with diamond blades.
Drilling is also fast by hand, after I got more proficient with it 15mm an hour. Also show methods to hollow out the vase as drilling the core.
The striations in granite perfectly match, as where limestone, marble and other stones leave a different pattern.
The simple ancient tools work and perfectly match the marks of the artefacts.
Where as there is no evidence for advanced technology, no experiment can be conducted since no can describe what it is, all other ancient tools have survived but not even a trace of the mining operations such as slag remain.
It really is case of the evidence and experiments that do exist against a case of no evidence.
As for lifting ancient tech and materials are capable of doing it.
Sound levitation would ruin the stone because of the vibrations, and deafen the people if not kill them.
It’s literally a weapon tech and even those devices can’t do much more than make a pebble shake a little bit.
The energy needed to lift tonnes would be extreme.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded 15mm an hour is stupid slow. who would chose this as an acceptable technique?!
@@bladetj modern gangsaws cut through granite at about 30mm an hour.
In the last 70 years the world has changed. What’s unacceptable now was normal everyday life back then.
Miners with picks and ponies pulling out carts.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded do you suggest that Egyptians transported large saws and drills hundreds of miles and would leave items so valuable out on the ground to willy nilly. Why also is there no Glyphs of the Tube drills at the correct time period drilling into larger stones. Why are there no Glyphs of the construction of the pyramids at the time they were supposedly built. Why did they suddenly stop all the high precision works and suddenly start making lower quality.
@@SacredGeometryDecodeddo we have proof that this tech could be used to create vases of granite with 2mm thick walls? I don't think so.
No one has ever said these tools weren't used for this. Kinda hard to deny when there's hieroglyphs showing it. We're saying the megalithic stones were obviously not cut, shaped, and transported by the Egyptians. If so there would most definitely be records of it.
The largest channels do deny it though, they insist high tech diamond lathes used.
There are records of Egyptians quarrying, shaping and moving them. Including obelisks and colossal statues.
These records are not hidden or obscure but for some reason not well known.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded A lot of channels go so far as claim that the most symmetrical stone vases could only be made with tools that had a dozen or more degrees of freedom like modern CNC tools. That seems like a reach, imo something that approximates an end mill with a range of eccentrics could do the work and in fact may have amounted to a crude but clever form of analog mechanical computer like a compound spirograph. I'd agree that the methods depicted here are fine for the more plentiful lower symmetry vases but falls well short of what seems to have inspired this industry.
Between the dynastic habit of appropriation and how the people of Kemet themselves believed their culture extended much farther into the past and was started by "gods" that later dynastic Egypt could only ape, how accurate can assume such depictions to be? It's not like the hieroglyph for pyramid, not even the Great Pyramid depicts a triangle of the right slope. They're depictions and may only be the best guesses of that culture rather than a direct record.
@@johnassal5838 The timeline of the Egyptian civilization spanned thousands of years. The population of the Nile valley over that time was in the millions. Every household would have required dishes, bowls, cups, vessels of all sizes, etc. The industry that fulfilled this need would, like today, have produced mostly pieces that were functional but not on the level of "mom's best China". There would also be pieces intended for burial or other ceremonial uses. These would have been of higher quality and greater care would have been used in manufacture. Plenty of demonstrations have proven that the tools and techniques that the Egyptians had were sufficient to produce what has been unearthed. Stone workers in from that time till the present went through apprenticeship to later become masters of their craft.
I'm sure the people of Kemet believed a lot of things that we don't today. What dating methods were used to establish when the "40,000" pieces of pottery were made? If the best pieces were determined to be pre-dynastic...how? What methods of dating do alt-history devotees accept as accurate?
@@SacredGeometryDecodedbecause these ideas are only planted by non egyptologists.
@@johnassal5838 ua-cam.com/video/4GJSfTFcTi8/v-deo.htmlsi=yA0zbCw79KnSr-Ah
Great video. UA-cam has been hiding this sort of content.
Thanks and yes they are. Mention Atlantis or aliens and you get bumped up the algorithm.
Egyptians did find ways to bore stone. It is the older high tech Machined pots these techniques CAN''T replicate!
I’ve replicated it many times. Posted how to’s. Who told you it can’t be replicated. A few bucks and a couple hours it all it takes. Shamefully the “experts” keep repeating nonsense and avoiding doing the exact experiment they asked for.
These tools are used in Pots to turn milk to cheese or ground wheat to make flower for baking bread. Absolute doesnt do well for boring holes. I have to give them credit for trying to assume it is a tool for making holes in granite rocks.
They absolutely do work well. I’ve used them and filmed it many times.
Whoever told you they don’t work has never tried.
Did it escape anyone's attention that these depictions are describing drilling and production of vases of calcite and not granite?
That’s an amazing skill to discern stone type from those pictures.
As I shown with experiments the tools and abrasive works on granite too.
Just to bring that to your attention.
It does not explain the finding of core drill holes found in many sites around the world...
Yes it does. The real mystery is the number of people pretending to care about drill cores yet no one of this global community cares enough to try some experiments.
The fake interest is the greatest mystery of all. Unless viewed through the lens of new age religions filling up the space left by the older religions.
The walls of the tomb of Rekhmire are truly incredible and show depictions of workers doing every type of task....link to video worth a watch
Some examples are
Stepping on bellows by fire 3:37
Working on various vases 3:48
Bow drills and saws 4:03
Carving Statue 4:21
Carving on Scaffolding 4:31
ua-cam.com/video/-i0GGDEaRJE/v-deo.html
Rekhmires tomb is new kingdom if i am not mistaken. Still very interesting and extremely well preserved
Amazing depictions, at 5:17 in that video there appear to be pictures of large-stone workers and large discs on a wooden frame and another being manipulated are seen.
Any tool I have used (apart from a hammer) has involved more technique than grunt,
The S.A.M. guy has the technique semi perfected, would love to see what he can do in a year or two!
ua-cam.com/video/ocYhjIPNcME/v-deo.html
I posted this not too long ago, the RPM i get from that drill. 300 rpm consistently- up to 420 RPM when in the zone. I link to a site on modern granite core drilling and best RPM for optimal results. Right in the zone!!
RPM only one factor, the heavier the weight the better and now that I have gotten better I have increased the weight with losing RPM.
Will do a speed test of drill times and post it soon. The S.A.M posted a paper on this with their RPM and drill speed per hour. 8-12 mm per hour. With a heavier weight and 300 plus RPM I am confident I can take that a little further. With my light weight but higher RPM i was getting the same reults as them, now with the heavier weight though?
Though even with the current results there isn't a core that couldn't be done in 3 days tops, though the majority would be done in a single working day, 2 at the most. The LAHT people keeping saying it would take weeks, not sure where they get that figure but it isn't from any experiment I know, they do refer to one video featuring Denys Stocks and a 3 man bow drill team (60 RPM) but even that could do any of those core holes in under a week, certainly not weeks as they proclaim.
I agree that this is a far superior technique than a bow drill, you're at a more constant cutting speed, more of the time,
The bow drill technique means that half the time the tool is accelerating and decelerating and not really achieving much for the energy expended,
The heavier weight to increase cutting pressure is definitely the way to go, also it would be interesting to see an experiment with different grit size and how much is added per minute for optimum cutting rate
No Aliens 😂
Maybe a show about why rebar is needed and geopolymers won't work.
There are no rebars in the domes of Roman temples .. just the right mix of pumice and cement ....
@@szpakmateusz8500 non load bearing and filled with voids.
@@TheMoneypresident but stable for ages;) .... these are not modern concrete boxes ..
however, today there is more steel than concrete .. contemporary concrete is a guarantee for 50 years ... geopolymer does not suck so much water .. even lime mortar is better than cement mortar. That is why castles and cathedrals "stand" to this day ..
I'd never been convinced about these techniques until watching that Scientists Against Myths channel. I just wish someone would come up with a feasible answer to how they actually moved the larger stones like the Aswan Obelisk?
ua-cam.com/video/jM4wMKcuGKQ/v-deo.html
Playlist on moving megaliths with examples of recent times
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Just watched your video "Sumba Island Megalith Tradition Continues" and it struck me that we look at the ancient world as we look at the modern world. We think no one gets out of bed unless its for money or a gun at our heads or a whip on our backs. I'd guess the ancient world was not like this. Moving these megaliths or building Stonehenge or the Pyramids was probably a big celebration for all those involved and a great honor for them to have been a part of.
Close inspection of the holes and cores cut in the ancient granite show clear spiral marks. They also show the holes are tapered. Both of these signatures exclude the possibility of using an annular (copper tube) with abrasives. They were cut by single point cutters. No tubes, Lots of pressure with the axis of the cutter on a rotational angle. Could be done by hand but would require a lot of pressure and a very hard point...Diamond or corundum,
@@HanstheTraffer ua-cam.com/video/X8Q5A1FSWwk/v-deo.html
Incorrect, there is no continuous spiral. The lost high tech people know this but this was settled more than two years ago. Hi res photos of the core were taken from all angles. It's easy for anyone to verify by tracing the grooves. Though it shouldn't have been necessary since from the older photos available on line , even the cotton thread tests, show that it just isn't the case.
I myself have drilled many cores in different types of granite and with with abrasives and grit sizes to recreate the various forms of drill core marks.
With a few dollars investment and a few hours it is easy for anyone to prove to themselves if they doubt the work.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Can you post that photo?
I don't know if theyll let that link stay up.
But there's a video of Egyptians using the ancient techniques that explains the bottom piece on the drill.
Title of video
"Egypts stone carvers keep their ancestors traditions alives - still standing "
Nice video but they aren't traditional techniques as they are using iron hand drills and tungsten carbide tipped saws.
This is the BEST example and explanation I have ever saw in regard to ancient drilling techniques. It actually makes perfect sense and would leave the so called "scoop marks" found at the bottom of cuts. I strongly suspect, at this point, that they drilled holes and then used a vibrating wire saw with counterweight to cut perfectly straight lines. I seriously think this mystery will be solved soon. Then comes the question of how they moved them but looks like we have the puzzle solved by 2/3.
Not sure how you'd use this to leave scoop marks, especially since they are so smooth. Don't believe they would have gone to the trouble of polishing the scoop marks, either, so where are the circular (arc) marks from the business end?
@@StephenTinius look through his archive of videos and he has one that explains that. In a nut shell it has to do with how holes were drilled to crack the stone and they're left when the stone is finally snapped out of its place in the quarry. Look, I enjoy the lost ancient technology story as much as the next person but the more I look into it, Ben from charter X and Graham are making claims that just aren't true. I'm not talking about the flood or even that civilizations are dated incorrectly but as far as if the dynastic Egyptians couldn't have built the pyramids it really looks like they could have. I don't want to bicker about it but I simply suggest really doing the research if it's the truth you seek. After all, either way it has zero bearing on our daily lives. Peace be with you and may luck be on your side.
Did they have access to diamond dust?
No however diamond isn’t necessary.
I have drilling-polishing granite how to videos using crushed granite and sandstone as well as corundum.
The golden rule is that like cuts like.
As noted abrasives such as sand - which was plentiful - and corundum would suffice. Corundum is Mohs 9 and emery corundum was mined on the Greek island of Naxos for millennia until modern times. Also some speculate that it might have been mined in the eastern desert as well.
So keep in mind a few things. Papyri seals made of limestone such as mimic those seen in ancient Sumer have been found in Egypt dating to predynastic times. Also a fragment of a stone object unearthed at Amarna which now resides in the NYC Met museum was made in part using a tubular drill. In the drill hole was residue which when analyzed showed = copper and corundum. What does that tell you??
1 - that the Egyptians had a source of emery corundum which was used in stone working.
2 - that they had contact with other civilizations - even in predynastic times - and they were able to import/copy things for themselves.
Ergo the Egyptians had access to items not local to Egypt itself + that their knowledge and technology spanned centuries such that it would constantly be improved upon. Thinking of ancient Egypt as "primitive" is a misnomer. Yes they were less technological than we are but they were not stooopid by any means. They had a highly organized society making them capable of obtaining raw materials from afar and copying technologies from others as well as developing and improving upon their own.
As a final thought. When the Persians conquered Egypt the Egyptian stonemasons renown for their ability to work stone was such that Darius send numbers of them to help build his capital city of Persepolis which contains sections representing the different cultures making up the Persian Empire.
@@varyolla435 rock crystal (silica sand) 100% quartz also widely found in Egypt including Nile Valley. Still exported now.
Denys Stocks uses desert sand in his demonstrations but points out it’s not the optimal choice since unknown amount of organic matter and other minerals dilute the abrasive value.
In the workers village at Giza granite chips found with the ovens for bread baking. I would suggest they were calcining the granite waste to easily break it up into a sand. Just a pet theory but based on my own experience with my granite waste. Especially when it comes to making a fine dust for polishing items such as the Khafre statue.
Although the used for fine powder like that could extend further. Another personal idea is in regards to arsenical copper, the artifacts found from early dynastic period have arsenic levels way too high for natural impurities, up to 3% in some cases.
After calcining ores arsenic is concentrated and still a big issue in mining tailings. It had puzzled me a long time as to how they added it since most sources put the Greek alchemist Zosimus as the first to isolate arsenic in approx 4th century BC at Thebes.
Yet the Jiroff culture are suspected of knowing about arsenic as well with some suggestions they traded arsenic separately from their copper.
@@varyolla435 not to forget Peruvian copper very high in arsenic also.
Knife found at Machu Picchu also high amount of bismuth which also adds to the strength.
The hints of ancient technology in metallurgy that go before the accepted Greek era usage always puzzled me. As to why those looking for “lost tech” censored these references as well. Years back I was pushing this angle hard , steam engines used arsenical copper/bronze for the boilers which tells you how strong it is. As well as all the advantages it has when it comes to casting which is why bell makers and canons used arsenic with the more conventional tin bronze.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Interesting speculations. As to granite. The worker village at Giza which Lehner's team excavated dates to Khafre/Menkaure. No artifacts relating Khufu were found there. Yet Khufu established Giza and tombs continued to be added. While Djedefre after his father Khufu opted to construct his own pyramid north of Giza - Khafre and Menkaure as noted opted to return to the necropolis.
I suspect likely due to the time factor and existing infrastructure. Remember that Pharaohs who ruled a long time sometimes meant those who followed if already older faced less time on the throne. So an existing harbor complex at Giza along with available limestone may have been attractive to simply continue on there rather than seeking new locations to start anew.
As to granite. I prefer a more simple explanation. The worker village contained infrastructure to sustain thousands - to include a large bakery area. Think modern grills. Despite running on propane they can come with lava rocks for decorative effect and = to retain heat when cooking. So granite being better at heat radiation and less likely to fracture when heated compared to limestone which holds water may have served in this capacity. Granite stone quarry debris added to firepits run constantly for large scale baking operations might help sustain heat after the wood burns down so as to reduce the amount of wood needed. Just a theory of course but it makes sense.
Good video!
It would be interesting to see a version where people create the cobbler tube from the ground up, using the tools that were available in the time of the Egyptians, and not some perfectly modern quality milled ones.
ua-cam.com/video/QU78TtJwTgQ/v-deo.html
they make a large diameter pipe by wrapping a copper sheet around a shaft, many Egyptian tubes made that way, the copper fittings for bed posts of Queen Hetephere.
Also at the end they cast a tube from scratch, it's not the neatest but they aren't experienced metalsmiths. Though if you search around, copper casting- lost wax technique there are a lot of cool videos on that. The animal figurines- ankh 's etc cast from copper. Tube casting pretty simple in comparison to the ancient stuff.
look at the gold, silver and copper jewellery, hundred plus tiny delicate little tubes for each necklace.
drills are fine, but made with copper ? c'mon
ua-cam.com/video/NXfE4bP2N6U/v-deo.html
Just like the existence of these drills, people like Bright Insight have no idea what they are talking about or are deliberately lying.
Partially completed drill core were found with the abrasive still inside and that included copper residue.
Don't be fooled by those charlatans, if I was to say a grinding wheel is fine, but with a paper backing c'mon.
It's the sand that cuts not the paper, it's the sand that cuts not the copper. It's the sand that cuts not the steel. And the old chestnut that you need diamond is another fallacy they keep pushing even though it is utterly ridiculous since before diamond abrasive was avaialble people were doing it.
They still use copper lapping plates and drills in gem stone industry in some parts of the world.
These things and other demonstrations and info is heavily censored by the Lost High Tech types.
Others and myself show how to use these materials and do what the Lost High Tech peeps say is impossible.
They won't show those things because they are dishonest. They know all about them but to protect their business they need to lie.
Agreed. Copper can not cut boring holes into granite stone, found within the Saqqara pyramids.
@@ututheavenger I have done it. I have how to videos including making my own abrasive.
It’s such a silly myth because if you understood how steel cuts granite you’d giggle at people who question copper.
Whoever has been feeding you that BS is not your friend.
@@ututheavenger 5:04 ?🤡 Do you even watch the video before commenting?
Did you even watch the video before commenting?🤡
5:04
Looks as if the jars have cutting fluid inside there grit
yeah when denys stocks presented his theory i had to laugh at him when i watched the "full" vid of him that u posted ;'''D
his version would dmg the workers wrists so quickly... doesnt make alot of sense...
good that u think so as well ;)
Huge respect for Denys but he also very resistant to wet method of drilling and cutting. It leaves the striations that match ancient cores and blocks.
That Russian team based their work of Denys Stocks but they’ve really advanced the experimentation and results, plus their methods are much faster.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded
Not sure why he'd resist the "wet method" so much. Everything I've done cutting and polishing agates and petrified wood uses wet techniques:
1) tumble polishing - uses water and grit
2) cutting stone slabs - uses water or oil and diamond saw blades
3) grinding and shaping stones - diamond wheels with water
4) polishing - leather pad, cerium oxide and water
Always a fluid present to reduce dust, cool the equipment and stone and carry the grit.
Yeah, plus you can get virtually every grain of copper back as well. In his book, lectures and demos he is very dedicated to the dry method. Or at least he was, I am not sure if that has changed. Most material from him that ai have is quite old now.
yea often seems like the "official" side does the cherry picking system as well like the ancient alien high technology space travel trolls... they have some theory and adjust everything to it and not let the theory develop by peoples findings...
also i dont like how he jokes sth like "u can drill to the center of the earth with this" directly after presenting the kinda bogus drilling method... as the only way to use that tool... its as well bit like the rhetoric tricks the ancient alien trolls use to cover up when they obviously said sth that didnt made any sense...^^
they did for sure everything to improve their technique and efficiency... but pretty sure not mainly for the "money" aspect liek he implies...
maybe his theory of the workers dying all young doesnt add up with the "wet" method... it would had surely reduced the amount of dust the folks would have to breath in... besides being more effective
There is no way this technique was used to create the famous Saqqara vases or disc of Sabu. Those are way too intricate and fragile.
ua-cam.com/video/GCgtBP1DYlE/v-deo.html
It does work for fine work, this ring is about as thin as the thinnest ring on the neck of the vases it Saqqara.
The vases are only thin at their necks.
The thinnest being a Roman funerary alabaster urn. And a much older diorite bowl/dish. Those are the ones mentioned by Petrie that get promoted up by lost high tech types.
Still now fine work is finished by hand. The drill just removes the bulk of the material.
The striations left by these drill perfectly matches the striations left on the inside also.
The Sabu disc is quite imprecise and unbalanced so a drill like this is way to symmetrical to have made it.
No way eh...check out his latest video
@@itsnot_stupid_ifitworks I did and it does NOT explain how those vessels are carved inside the vessels! also doesnt explain how to carve those overturned flaps of the disc of sabu.
G G this video shows how the inside of the vases were ground out soooo.....maybe watch again?
G G just so we are clear. It's narrowed down in your mind to the two types of vases you mentioned that can't be made correct? The thousands of other vases you accept were made in these (actually depicted in the hieroglyphs) ways ?
Old man was drilling limestone which is soft. Granite is hard and brittle. Does not add up to ancient pyramid fabrication. No one talks about the enormous task at hand, the logistics of feeding all those builders, housing. The list goes on. I suggest that whoever made the pyramids was hiding something important (not a body) something that had something to do with space travel, not the afterlife.
It’s granite I’m drilling.
Lots of experts in comments but no one ever figured to try drilling and cutting granite?
I have to point how often I get comments like this.
This video proves that it is possible to drill a stone by simple tools. But it doesn’t explain how they machined some of the most precise vases (down to one millionth of an inch.
Actually they are claiming 1/1000th of an inch. I get as good or better though, those same people made a big deal of how impossible it was to polish to a smooth surface, ua-cam.com/video/xLV4vLi9GnQ/v-deo.html
Chris Dunn, the godfather of all this precision business is a out and out con man fraudster faker of data
ua-cam.com/video/9ov6YjrGAP0/v-deo.html
I have a bunch more it you'd like, how Uncharted X lies repeatedly and still does it after he has the data.
The "precision" statues and boxes too. It's all BS and they know it and that's they those grifters censor so heavily.
Shows people doing task but not a stone jar..... let us know in how ever many years when you are done making one!
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Sorry to have made you cry, I just was hoping to see it done. I'm gonna make a video called making sandwiches technique re-examined and I'll pull out the ingredients from the fridge but not assemble the sandwich. That's where I am at.....
@@jamessoucy3740 you should have picked a better cult
Which cult am I in? Sandwich Lovers of America?@@SacredGeometryDecoded
@@jamessoucy3740 stone vase worshippers international
You know that since you opened with the classic hymn.
Let us know when you catch up.
I do love a good battle of wits but you are unarmed. I have better sport elsewhere.
Best of luck in life. You’re really going to need it.
The holes are tapered. They were made with single point cutters. Could be done by hand but not with copper tubes. The hieroglyphs show single point cutters. They need far more pressure but will cut tapered holes with the axis of the tool focused on the cutting edge with a tapered rotation. The hieroglyph shows a tool designed for this tapered rotational axis,
ua-cam.com/video/H-d8FZjS42Y/v-deo.html
Others and myself have made many tapered cores with copper tubes. With that type of drill and not using a frame it is essentially impossible not to create a taper.
Copper is excellent material for the task. I have even drilled using tubes made of sheet copper 0.35mm in thickness. It also replicates the other signatures such as the striation patterns.
I have a long playlist with many experiments in granite with copper and other primitive techniques.
ua-cam.com/video/XY6SUTPV018/v-deo.html
@@SacredGeometryDecoded I will make one without a tube and show you how it works. You folks just don't think out of the box.
@@HanstheTraffer You just said it can't be done with a copper tube. Now you are giving advice on how to think?
@@SacredGeometryDecoded The copper tube method is the obvious first idea that one would get when seeing a hole drilled with a core. Just as annular cutters cut. Common process called trepanning. However when I saw the picture of the tool the Egypians left, I saw that the shape of the tool was such that the single cutter on the end was offset by a crooked axis AND the weight was such that the balance was against the offset. A perfect pictoral description of how the single point cutter would work. I think people assumed that the picture was crude so the crook and seeming imbalance was just poorly drawn but if you study that geometry and physical application it shows how this tool was a single point cutter.
Sorry for the sarcastic comment.
Straight talking out of your ass showing how stupid you are.
They literally have videos doing it but your moronic ass is still saying it can't be done.