Heavy weight fighter is still our requirement to carry heavy missiles of Brahmos type . Edit- actually I wanted to say we cannot fulfill our requirement with light fighters only. We have su 30 for present. In future we also require some heavy fighter to replace su 30
For future we are developing cats warrior , in near future we can find two-three drones flying with stealthy amca or semi stealthy tedbf or even MWF which will carry extra loads like ghatak
Good point. In a realistic scenario, if a Chinese Su-30 is coming in for a bombing mission, with heavy weapons and 100% fuel, a Tejas inceptor with just 6 x Air to Air missile and about 70% Fuel could pose a tough challenge for the Su-30.
@@snellatlums Xina k baade mein baat hua, fir v mirchi lag gayi ? Maan liya k dono countries mein ache relation hain, lekin itni v possessives kis baat k liye ? Agar woh bole building se jump karne ko to kya kardoge ?
@@Babai_308 are choro bhai ab ye allah ka nahi xillah ka chuste hai waise bhi inka xillah masjid ko toilet me convert kar ke deta hai inko inhe kya pata j 10 su 35 ye to bas uske samne tel laga ke ulta letne ka sok rakhte hai
MiG 29 can't be called a light fighter. It's a medium weight multirole fighter jet. Light fighters are Mirages, MiG 21, etc. Rafale is also medium weight category.
The biggest disadvantage the heavy fighters have and in particular for India is Logistics..... All Heavy 4rth Gen plus fighters includings Sukhoyis, F-15, F-18 etc require long runways and special blast pens for storage. This means especially for india, heavy fighters cannot be deployed right till the forward bases or advanced landing grounds. This means there as to be additional costs for setting up air bases which India cannot afford especially in the high altitude terrain of Northern Areas. Twin engines have more combat punch and most importantly survivability in case one engine goes off, but this still doesn't suffice for the requirement of large air bases and maintenance. So India has no option but to choose light combat aircraft.
@adarsh pandey Everything depends on threat perception vs resources at hand. India has no capabilty or the trust level amongst global players that we can become an effective arms exporter. This is simply because there is a vast difference in what we show as prototypes and the end product quality. INSAS is a good example. So with that out of question, the only reason we make aircrafts is for own consumption and with our meagre production capabilty that too is a far fetched scene. So basically we import everything. Now to make Tedbf, we got have the threat perception, and our airforce is a defensive airforce with focus on defensive operations. We have no assertions of launching carpet bombings in Shanghai. Smaller Multirole combat aircrafts which can act as interceptors, fighters and bombers at the same time and perform multiple missions is our requirement. If in future we realise that China has achieved far too much dominance (which already exists) in air power, that we have a direct threat to our hinterland, then I think we will be forced to come out of our shell. Otherwise, there is simply not enough money.
Sir , I think that you've been mistaken , almost all bases including the Northern most bases are capable of handling all military aircrafts . That's not how things work. , There are fuckin Even larger transport aircrafts that take more runway than Su-30 MKIs and Hey Make it easily . At least in terms of aircrafts , india do not have any issues with Logistics of Aircrafts , especially Fighter Aircrafts . The only reason that Mig-29 was deployed in Tibet region and Not Su-30MKI was not because of anything related to Logistics but The Fact that Mig-29 has a better service ceiling. 👍 Jai Hind 🙏
@@khalsasikhpunjabda rohit is almost correct as my uncle himself was a mig21 pilot and he told me that nowadays almost all our airbases have sufficient logistics and for your answer i must say mig29 has a higher service ceiling than su 30 and performs better and such height
@@khalsasikhpunjabda are sir aap toh bura man gaye maine kaha almost abhi bhi kuch issues hai jo samay ke sath sahi ho jayenge main issue air force ka hai woh hai depleting squadron strength sabse pehle isko sahi karne ki jarrurat hai
Please make a video on Turkish defence industries and their products. Should India be worried about close defence relationship between Turkey and Pakistan ?
The main thing is every category fighter has its own use and importance we can't say which is better category SU 30 MKI, Rafale, LCA Tejas koi ek dussre ka role nahi le sakte
Heavy jets are stills required for strike role & bombing enemy targets After obtaining air superiority Light weight fighter are of no use Because they can't provide long range & endurance So heavy fighter are very much needed in ground support role & also anti shipping role !
Our amca will be heavy fighter... Amca is like f22, used for bombing while mwf and mk1a will be used for dogfights as every 5 gen fighter is trash in dogfight
@@megatron1560 AMCA - > Advance Medium Combat Aircraft As its name says it's a medium weight fighter Not heavy weight like F22 Design of AMCA is very similar to F22 but it's in the catagory of F35
Hope to see the day when both the Meteor NG and the astra mk3 can be fired from the su30mki. After upgrading the Uttam radar with European software from mbda. It will be able to fire those deadly missiles.
मैट्रिक्स भाई। भारत अपनी 6 सकड्रोन्स LCA mk1 और 8 सकड्रोन्स में LCA Mk2 के साथ 2 या 3 सकड्रोन्स में साब ग्रिपेन ले लो। पता नही क्यो cute और अच्छा ऐरक्राफ्ट लगता है। एक दम शार्प एंड बैलेंस्ड
भाई तेजस MK1A कहीं भी कम नहीं होगा ग्रीपेन से,, उल्टा भारतीय मिसाइल और रडार उससे भी बढ़िया होंगे,,, फिर हम क्यूं विदेशी पर पैसा बर्बाद करें? Gripen के पार्ट्स अलग अलग कंट्री से हैं,, वॉर इमरजेंसी में कोन time to time प्रोवाइड करेगा? किसी पे भरोसा है? तेजस mk-2 तो gripen से कहीं ऊपर का होगा,, राफेल F3r के जैसा सैमी स्टेल्थ होगा,, सिर्फ इंजन ही 1 होगा,,, 2 नहीं,,,
1. IAF Does NOT need any more heavy category aircrafts period 2. Probably few more squadrons of Rafale makes sense but no more procurement of new twin engine jets. 3. Top Priority should be to reduce dependency on Russia and slowly move towards indigenous and western jets. 4. For emergency procurement Gripen at right cost would be a very nice solution. I won't mind few squadrons of upgraded Mirage 2000s from Taiwan as well.
"Light fighters, are good in Defence and Attack in a #SmallArea. But #HeavyAircraft are good in range and for Attack. If you defending, Light Fighters are good but for Attack Heavy Fighter are still effective.
@defencematrix Actually twin engine jets have more power & radar dome.. so their radar detection range is more than small aircrafts. But as they also have huge cross section area.. so they get detected easily.. But they have more fuel, so they can carry for longer range & time air petrol than small.. Main point is bigger aircrafts use mainly for deep strike mission with heavy weapons.. Where small are better with border protection & interception.. But now medium twin engine aircrafts are performing better with small cross section area, twin engine safety, good power for radars, comparatively low maintenance & with moderate fuel & weapons load carrying deep air strike.. As standoff weapons getting too much better & higher range.. Thats why we procuring Rafael...
@@DefenceMatrix Maybe.. But Germany & England creating their 6th gen jet design which is more heavier than medium class.. So.. I dont think heavier fighters need will go off easily...
My opinion is Heavy fighters can carry powerful radar which can detect enemy fighters much early and can fire bvrs before getting detected. yes bvr have improved but we need to remember that radars have also improve and now every fighter is aiming to carry aesa radar. the disadvantage of light fighters is they cant carry powerful radars because of single engine.
Tejas have 200km redar j10 have 200km redar jf17 block 3 170km Gripen 200km All are capble enough to fire any bv missile on these planet Jai hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Medium Weight fighters are bridging the gap between them. Medium ones have the advantages of them. So, Air Forces are moving away from Heavy-weight fighters, instead go for Medium ones. Big example are FAF and IAF.
There is still a big gap and that gap is radar, with 2 engines you can have a better radar and bvrs can do your enemy and heavy can have more bvrs than lights , you missed these points
@@abhilashyadav2274 What the Fuck. It wasn't shot down ! Amrams were fired and they returned right back. ! I have my own family member working at the base . And he told me that only The Mig-21 was missing . Rest of them scrambled back.
Lightbweoght is small jet with only 1 engine which can carry some missiles less than medium or heavy.... Heavy fighters are huge jets with twin engines like f15 which is best for bombing a target as its payload is far greater than light combat aircraft and it can carry more missiles..... Thats why f15 and su30mki looks damn huge in front of f16 and tejas lca
@@megatron1560 That's my point , we don't have clear definition . If light weight aircraft is suppose to be small in size , then what is maximum size limits for light weight , medium weight and heavy weight aircraft ? If light weight aircraft is suppose to be single engine , then F 35 is also light weight aircraft . But maximum take off weight , empty weight , fuel capacity and engine thrust of F 35 is greater than double engine Rafale , Mig 29 . I think criteria should be Max takeoff weight or Wing area or combination of both .
heavy fighters do have a better survival chance of the plane as they can afford to lose one engine and could still fly or atleast give the pilot more time to eject before going down, while light fighters get a direct fatal explosion or fall if hit as they have only one engine to fly, heavy fighters also tends to have slightly to quite a bit more speed. Although light fighters are easier to manufacture as well as maintain, due to the single engine.
Ever Heard Of DASA and CASA ? I think Not 👍. That shows how much you guys know and what sort of wrong information you are given . Do you have any idea how much DASA was involved . Just because England operates most amount of Typhoons doesn't mean that Germany sat down on the sidelines.
@@RohitRaj_0911 I think you didn't get my point I meant that these 4 countries share production among them like BAE and DASA both shares 33 % production each 21% by aeritalia and 13 % by CASA So in short just like they shares percentage of research and production work exactly the same way PAC and CAC share 52% and 48% production work respectively so it is a Co production of Pakistan and China just like eurofighter typhoon is a Co production of UK, Germany, Italy and Spain.... So it is not like Pakistan asked China to make an aircraft for Pakistan airforce....
Why India Purchase Su 30 MKI in numbers of 232?? maybe 120 is sufficient and other 100 we can buy another light fighter what you think about too many numbers of su 30MKI.
Sir ek question hai.... Kya hmare heavyweight fighters sufficient numbers hai china Aur Pakistan ko dekhte hue because china k pass Kariban 1000 heavyweight fighter jets hai (Su35 Su27 Su30 J16 J11 J20)
For me best Twin engine heavy weight category fighter are USAF F22 Raptor, Dassault Rafale. Eurofighter Typhoon, Russian SU 35, SU 30 MKK MKI, USAF F15 Eagle 2 n F18 super Hornet. Medium weight single engine category then nothing beats F16 Block 70 n F21 being offered to India under MMRCA.
Fighter jet jitna bada hoga utna bada radar fit Kar sakte hai bada powerful engine use Kar sakte jyada badi bvr missiles ko use kar sakte hai (Astra mk3) aur ground attck me toh mukabla hi nhi hai heavy weight ka light weight se.
Are bhai light fighter jet jyada advance ho to medium Ho chahe heavy weight fighter jet Ho UN par light fighter jet ko age hogi kyunki vah halka hoga aur performance acchi hogi per usmein avionic aur vipin package advance ho to
@@aamerjamal we're making and testing these electronics upgrades in our 'HOME' as we produce our own AESA radar ,datalink, electronics counter measures systems in our own country unlike you.
@@bhavesh2232 You Guyz are trying to make these system so does we, only difference is we only announce something when we near completion or after completing it, btw we have our own data link and using it from 2010, we are working on bvr missiles and other sub system too, from AI to drones and Fifth Gen jet
@Aamer Jamal In recent comments you were saying " Ghar py yeh gen Bana rahay hoo? No maws, no advance ew ecm, no datalink super dragy airframe," we've been working on these things for years without reverse engineering. We announce our testings when things are done or they are in phase testing as public has right to know where their money is getting spent ,these is what Democratic countries do. And we've achieved a good success rate by doing decades of research. And yes we're aware of your programs ,your partner programs etc. We never denied your efforts.
Couple of points I want to add here. First of all, the assumption that BVR Missiles are so elective now that close range fights are almost unnecessary is a complete wrong statement. That was the assumption since the introduction of BVR AAMS and it is yet to replace the guns and WVR Missiles. The most used BVR Active Radar AAM is AMRAAM and even when used against poorly equipped countries like Iraq, Syria, it has a success rate of 46% only. Those countries did not have any modern ECM capabilities and outmanned by US Planes at 10:1 ratio but still AMRRAMs success rate is very underwhelming even when helped by AWACS. Missiles are getting advanced but so are the Countermeasures. Example how SU-30 MKI evaded the Pakistani launched AMRAAMS. New Missiles like MBDA meteor, are yet to be tested against any modern aircrafts or airforces and those projected capabilities are theoretical. Now regarding Heavy Fighters, that has a different role compared to a light weight fighters and just because they are heavy does not mean that they are less maneuverable or less capable in dog fight as that entirely depends on the design and engines of the aircraft. A Su 27 fighter, without any TVC, can outmaneuver most of the Teen series medium and light weight fighters, even without any weapon load for both. They are also used for different roles, like Deep penetration under enemy territory, monitoring the naval water, way far from the shore or even for guarding airspace of countries which are bigger compared to most of the European nations, like India, China or Russia due to their ferry range and they actually need less number of maintenance while patrolling airspaces. Because of the range, they can be modified to perform Strike Fighter roles like F-15 Strike Eagle or Su-34 Fullback which are strike aircrafts based on air superiority fighters. Our own Su-30 MKI is one of the best examples of it which can perform Air-to-Air, Deep Penetration, Strike Missions and Naval Monitoring against enemy airshipsb due to its fuel capacity, range, huge weapon carrying capacity and versatility of using different kind of weapons. However, what I'm not sure why got missed here, is the weapon carrying capacities. A Light fighter can carry reasonable number of weapons but they are mostly air-to-air missiles. if you need an Aircraft which can carry wide range of Air and ground weapons in all weight class, you need either a medium or heavy weight fighter. Example is BrahMos integration in MKI. No Light weight fighter can have that integrated. These kind of integration can enable an heavy fighter to perform tons of different roles not possible by a Light Aircraft. Ultimately Aircrafts are not just there for fighting other aircrafts. Because of this versatility of medium and heavy fighters, you can see that Naval aircrafts are always of that category. There is no light weight fighter in Aircraft carriers in modern days.
We are forgetting, Meteor type SFDR with AESA seekers giving a longer No escape zone giving and more kill probability. So yes we came too far from Semi Active radar guided missiles.
@@DefenceMatrix That is a theoretical specification given, not actually tested in warfare. I just gave an statistical data of most used Active radar Guided AAM which is not semi-active by the way. And there are many ways to jam an AAM. The active seeker comes to play when it is very close range, around 20 km. Before that, the efficient way of jamming a BVR AAM is to jam its midcourse update channel. BTW, now a jammer can also be based on Phased Array technology and can jam wide range of Frequencies. May be checking some details about Rafael's Thales Spectre could give you some idea. It uses a Phased Array jammer which can jam the mid-course update channel of a BVR Missile. A missile's onboard electronics is not enough powerful to counter such advanced jamming in most cases and even a second of connection loss from the launching platform simply drives the missile of the course. High performance AESA Radars, like APG-81 can perform even Multispectral frequency Jamming against incoming missiles. Looks there is no argument about the capability of Meteor over other AAMs. But that will render close range combat useless is a too big of an statement. With the advancement in Missile tech, the countermeasure is also advancing, isn't it?
@@123Suryasis hello, the data which is out for the scored kills per launched missile is on all launches, not keeping the fact in mind from which ranges these missiles were fired. The probability of hitting the target increases with the decrease in launching range, that's why missile have no escape zones. Now with missiles like meteor which can sustain the speed for a longer duration, it gives an extended no escape zone which in turns increases the missile hitting probability, since the missile is not used in combat, so we can't say what percentage it will be, but there is no doubt about missiles better hitting probability. Now about jamming missiles, definitely the jamming has improved with towed decoy and better jammers came into play, but so is the missiles ECCM capability, it's not easy to jam a missile from a particular range. Jammers are good from a distance, not when you are close. So, definitely we came a good distance. We now have missile like MICA RF which are half the weight of Super 530D and almost gives twice the range, so now mirages can carry around 8 of them instead of two 530D they used to carry. Also in combat you are not fighting alone, always in team and with heavy fighters also they will get more chances to shoot but it doesn't mean they will have an edge because light fighter can also carry sufficient numbers of missiles for an air combat. And if you compare air package effectiveness with cost, light fighters will form a far deadly air package.
@@DefenceMatrix In a real War situation, in lot of cases, Missiles will be fired not at exact ideal situation, which gives a fighter opportunity to go close enough of the target aircraft to give the missile highest kill chance. The Enemy aircraft will also be targeting you and if get closer to give your missile a better chance, highly likely that you become a target of the enemy missile which will make you turn, hence dropping the mid-course upgrade. Can you show me a single modern day analysis claiming that the modern BVR Missiles have eliminates the requirement of close combats? That has been thought in many times and then was proven wrong in actual battle. Now. Regarding Light vs heavy Fighters, I am in agreement with you that in Air-to-Air combats, today's highly advanced light weight fighters are highly capable and can give heavy aircrafts a run for their money. I was stating that there are situations and cases where a Heavy or medium weight fighters have distinctive advantages and in some cases, they are the only choice. Also, it depends on the Country and their policy. NATO countries can opt with cheaper and lighter fighters because they know US, France or UK can provide heavy or medium Fighter coverage in numbers. But for countries like China or India, that's not the case and they need both type of aircrafts in certain numbers.
Best light fighters in the world are South Korean FA 50 and Tejas Mk1. Tejas Mk2 is being developed. When it comes to 4.3 gen medium sized or weight category fighter then nothing beats F16 Block 60/70 or new F21 offered to India bcoz 4.5 gen medium weight Rafales have never seen Air to Air combat. This is my personal opinion. Let see how this new F36 Kingsnake will be that US Military has ordered Lockheed Martin being developed to replace old F16. F36 Kingsnake airframe is dam good sexy n cool we have yet to see its technical details.
Doesn't matter if you have a heavy fighter or light fighter , only thing that will matter is electronic warfare capabilities of awacs, fighters or ew aircrafts even if you carry meteor missile and still can't hit the target due electronic attack on your avionics than even a J-10 can outperform rafale
My 10th exam is cancelled I was not watching matrix from 15 days as i was preparing for my board exam , now i am going to watch all his video in one day
Tejas airframe is so strong that it could withstand an Aircraft carrier landing....if Jf-17 landed on an aircraft carrier god knows what will happen to the aircrafts pilot...
Generally Speaking ! The Thing about Air To air dogfight missiles is , You getting a fighter jet in 1 missile is less than 50% and This Is for Today's standards . Saying that Radars have improved a lot , and Totally forgetting that Missile Jamming and Diverting technology by the aircrafts !
This goes both ways, but missiles are also coming with SFDR and AESA seeker with extended no escape zone and eccm capability, yes we came too far, talking about today's standard
@@DefenceMatrix Very True about the SFDR and AESA seakers being used in Missiles These days and I agree with it !! In older days when Semi active seakers were used, the main thing used to be that The Missile Starts Tracking ( I think you'll know this). Once tracking then hitting the target had more than 50% probability . Now With these latest seakers the Missile is More likely to track.. right ?? Absolutely . But your Point ends here ( for what you discussed in the video). The Latest fighters such as Su-57 , F-22 have equally advanced radar jamming , Missile Diverting and track detach ablities . These have come a long way too . Another thing , The No Escape zone is theoretical . There's a reason why These brand new missiles still have Proximity and Thermal sensors in them because A a fighter jet can Out maneuver a missile with right moves even in the So called no escape zone. Something you definitely know but I'll still write is that Missile are really fast and Poor in maneuvering( Small fins bro, no wings ) . That's why the sensors on Missiles and Flares to fool Missiles on jets . So , Even the New Pilots today are told to Fire 2 Missiles at an aircraft , to confirm the Splash . The French still teach it and So does the Americans . 👍. Thank You ., Big fan of your work . ! Keep making videos Sir .! Jai Hind 🙏
@@RohitRaj_0911 hello, the data which is out for the scored kills per launched missile is on all launches, not keeping the fact in mind from which ranges these missiles were fired. The probability of hitting the target increases with the decrease in launching range, that's why missile have no escape zones. Now with missiles like meteor which can sustain the speed for a longer duration, it gives an extended no escape zone which in turns increases the missile hitting probability, since the missile is not used in combat, so we can't say what percentage it will be, but there is no doubt about missiles better hitting probability. Now about jamming missiles, definitely the jamming has improved with towed decoy and better jammers came into play, but so is the missiles ECCM capability, it's not easy to jam a missile from a particular range. Jammers are good from a distance, not when you are close. So, definitely we came a good distance. We now have missile like MICA RF which are half the weight of Super 530D and almost gives twice the range, so now mirages can carry around 8 of them instead of two 530D they used to carry. Also in combat you are not fighting alone, always in team and with heavy fighters also they will get more chances to shoot but it doesn't mean they will have an edge because light fighter can also carry sufficient numbers of missiles for an air combat. And if you compare air package effectiveness with cost, light fighters will form a far deadly air package.
are bhai heavy weight 2 engine fighter jet desh ke liye achha hai jis desh ki sarhad jyada lambi hoti hai aur single-engine fighter jet use desh ke liye achha hai jiski sarhad chhoti hoti hai aur bhi bahut sare ismein sawal jawab hai batane ke liye
Heavy weight fighter is still our requirement to carry heavy missiles of Brahmos type .
Edit- actually I wanted to say we cannot fulfill our requirement with light fighters only. We have su 30 for present. In future we also require some heavy fighter to replace su 30
Our requirement is already fulfilled by su30mki
We have 270 su30mki heavy weight category fighter
For future we need unmanned stealth heavy bombers
For carrying heavy cruise missiles and for carpet bombing during full fledged war
For future we are developing cats warrior , in near future we can find two-three drones flying with stealthy amca or semi stealthy tedbf or even MWF which will carry extra loads like ghatak
Thats what amca is for.. Amca can carry brahmos
Heavy vs light
Who wins ?
Medium
Heavy vs light
Who wins??
Your name....
Flying coffins ??
@@abhilashyadav2274 bhag pakistani yaha se
@@abhilashyadav2274 93000
@@abhilashyadav2274 apne baap ke naam se mat aao abdul
Sir kya hum ek video AMCA aur TEJAS mk-2 ki ab tk ki saari updates aur expected timelines aur reality check pe dekh skte h.❤️❤️
There is only nose cone is designed for amca and for tejas mk2 they have relocate the canard and divertless air intake is added.
Still 15 years for amca and 7 years for mk2 and 4 more years to make it indigenous.
@@Adiishresthaaa sir aap pogo dekho
@@Adiishresthaaa kyu tumko RCS test of amca aur final design and chose of engen of mk2 of Tejas ke bare me nahi pata 👎
Correction: ur chu-ti-ya 😡
@@flamboyantpossum8572 किल्लर आदमी है। यार तू तो। आप पोगो देखो। किसी के सवाल को ऐसे कोई कुचलता है क्या। गलत बात है।
Heavy fighter Sukhoi😎
Kya mast chez bnai hai karigaro ne
Russian logo ka kamaal🤣
Beautiful.... Such sensible analysis....
Re tum to bade heavy fighter ho
Like the Su 30 on Fantastic tea Abhinandan Varthman day
Good point.
In a realistic scenario, if a Chinese Su-30 is coming in for a bombing mission, with heavy weapons and 100% fuel, a Tejas inceptor with just 6 x Air to Air missile and about 70% Fuel could pose a tough challenge for the Su-30.
That Su-30 bomber will have some J-10s and some Su-35s with it to ward off the samosa
@@snellatlums Xina k baade mein baat hua, fir v mirchi lag gayi ? Maan liya k dono countries mein ache relation hain, lekin itni v possessives kis baat k liye ? Agar woh bole building se jump karne ko to kya kardoge ?
@@Babai_308 are choro bhai ab ye allah ka nahi xillah ka chuste hai waise bhi inka xillah masjid ko toilet me convert kar ke deta hai inko inhe kya pata j 10 su 35 ye to bas uske samne tel laga ke ulta letne ka sok rakhte hai
@@snellatlums make some comparison on jf 17 and tejas and you will see the results you will not reply to this comment cause you will lose that debate
A 1v1 is far from a realistic scenario
Bhai 100k par q&a rakho kyoki ham bhi aapke baare me jan saake ❤
MiG 29 can't be called a light fighter. It's a medium weight multirole fighter jet. Light fighters are Mirages, MiG 21, etc. Rafale is also medium weight category.
You are the most intelligent person . Lol
@@abhilashyadav2274😂😂😂
Banane Wale nahi batayege ...ye batayege kaun light hai ...,kaun heavy
East or West junkfighter17 is the best
😂
😀
Bhook lagi hai ider aou kela khilou tum ko mai
Samosa khao gei
@@SalmanSalman-gr8ko itna paisa Nahi h 😂😂😂
Best Indian defense analyst..... Respect from Pakistan
Ek vdo S400 system pe baniye #defencematrix ❤️
The biggest disadvantage the heavy fighters have and in particular for India is Logistics..... All Heavy 4rth Gen plus fighters includings Sukhoyis, F-15, F-18 etc require long runways and special blast pens for storage. This means especially for india, heavy fighters cannot be deployed right till the forward bases or advanced landing grounds. This means there as to be additional costs for setting up air bases which India cannot afford especially in the high altitude terrain of Northern Areas.
Twin engines have more combat punch and most importantly survivability in case one engine goes off, but this still doesn't suffice for the requirement of large air bases and maintenance. So India has no option but to choose light combat aircraft.
@adarsh pandey Everything depends on threat perception vs resources at hand. India has no capabilty or the trust level amongst global players that we can become an effective arms exporter. This is simply because there is a vast difference in what we show as prototypes and the end product quality. INSAS is a good example. So with that out of question, the only reason we make aircrafts is for own consumption and with our meagre production capabilty that too is a far fetched scene. So basically we import everything.
Now to make Tedbf, we got have the threat perception, and our airforce is a defensive airforce with focus on defensive operations. We have no assertions of launching carpet bombings in Shanghai. Smaller Multirole combat aircrafts which can act as interceptors, fighters and bombers at the same time and perform multiple missions is our requirement. If in future we realise that China has achieved far too much dominance (which already exists) in air power, that we have a direct threat to our hinterland, then I think we will be forced to come out of our shell. Otherwise, there is simply not enough money.
Sir , I think that you've been mistaken , almost all bases including the Northern most bases are capable of handling all military aircrafts . That's not how things work. , There are fuckin Even larger transport aircrafts that take more runway than Su-30 MKIs and Hey Make it easily . At least in terms of aircrafts , india do not have any issues with Logistics of Aircrafts , especially Fighter Aircrafts .
The only reason that Mig-29 was deployed in Tibet region and Not Su-30MKI was not because of anything related to Logistics but The Fact that Mig-29 has a better service ceiling. 👍
Jai Hind 🙏
@@RohitRaj_0911 trust someone who knows a thing or two about flying. Nothing more to say.
@@khalsasikhpunjabda rohit is almost correct as my uncle himself was a mig21 pilot and he told me that nowadays almost all our airbases have sufficient logistics
and for your answer i must say mig29 has a higher service ceiling than su 30 and performs better and such height
@@khalsasikhpunjabda are sir aap toh bura man gaye maine kaha almost abhi bhi kuch issues hai jo samay ke sath sahi ho jayenge main issue air force ka hai woh hai depleting squadron strength sabse pehle isko sahi karne ki jarrurat hai
Assalam alaikum jonab.
Jf17 no. (view)- 110
Missile no. (Comment) - 6
Are samalkhe ka hai ke?
Aare kehena kya chahate ho
@@Life_isstrange bhai tere samajh na aave😅 Haryanvi mein kuch pucha hai
@@harshparashar1295karnal ka hu bhai....but samalkha rha hu 1-2 saal... kyo
@@karambirduhan1996 Bhai duhan, kadyan or ruhal zyada panipat samalkha mein hi hain. Basically duhan's are not inhabitants of karnal
Bro can u make a video on allocation of defence budget towards pension of the total budget
And how one can overcome it ?
There is no way it can be undone
Only way is to make India rich by export of everything👍
PrIvAtIzE tHe MiLitArY...
No pension, better performance....
@@throwaway9279 😂
@@throwaway9279 vaah
Mai tera fan ho gaya😂😂
@@throwaway9279 lol r u crazy😂?
The most detailed analysis. The channel is awesome
congo to all my class 10th buddies
Please make a video on Turkish defence industries and their products. Should India be worried about close defence relationship between Turkey and Pakistan ?
The main thing is every category fighter has its own use and importance we can't say which is better category
SU 30 MKI, Rafale, LCA Tejas koi ek dussre ka role nahi le sakte
Multi role ka naam suna hai ?
@@aakasharora290 yes iye 3 bhi multirole hai
@@aakasharora290 Rafale is a multirole medium cadre aircraft fighter and one of favourites. 💓💫🙏
भारतीय वायुसेना मे सिर्फ SU 30 MKI प्युअर हेवी वेट फायटर जेट हे बाकी सब मिडीयम और लाईट कॅटेगरी के फायटर जेट हे.
Su 30 is useless against F 16
Hum first hum first.....
This video was posted 32 minutes ago. How come your comment is 37 minutes old. 😂
@@brothergunns5055 isliye hum first.....😂😂
Heavy jets are stills required for strike role & bombing enemy targets
After obtaining air superiority
Light weight fighter are of no use
Because they can't provide long range & endurance
So heavy fighter are very much needed in ground support role & also anti shipping role !
Our amca will be heavy fighter... Amca is like f22, used for bombing while mwf and mk1a will be used for dogfights as every 5 gen fighter is trash in dogfight
@@megatron1560
AMCA - > Advance Medium Combat Aircraft
As its name says it's a medium weight fighter
Not heavy weight like F22
Design of AMCA is very similar to F22 but it's in the catagory of F35
@@megatron1560 only SU 57 being a 5th gen fighter is capable of doing extreme manoeuvrable & dogfight and carrying the Sukhoi legacy
Jai hind
Jai bharat
Apka campair is owsome, 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Hope to see the day when both the Meteor NG and the astra mk3 can be fired from the su30mki. After upgrading the Uttam radar with European software from mbda. It will be able to fire those deadly missiles.
Thanks bhai acha laga video dekh k
Content bahut banate hai sahab but ap bade pyar se banate ho.. I aspire to be like you ❤
Good information sir... 👍
Thankyou for making this video i was so confused on buying a heavy or light fighter no I'll easily buy a heavy fighter 🙏👍
Good information
Sir kya STOBAR type ke carrier ko kya CATOBAR type ke carrier me modify kr sakte h kya?
Kar sakte hai par usme paisa aur samay lagbhag utna hinlagta hai jeetna Ek new aircraft carrier banane me .
Jai hind 🇮🇳
Excellent topics you chose to explain ☺
4:39 woww😳😳😳 this is serious
LoL . IAF fly MiG 21. That's serious.
मैट्रिक्स भाई।
भारत अपनी 6 सकड्रोन्स LCA mk1
और 8 सकड्रोन्स में LCA Mk2
के साथ 2 या 3 सकड्रोन्स में साब ग्रिपेन ले लो। पता नही क्यो cute और अच्छा ऐरक्राफ्ट लगता है। एक दम शार्प एंड बैलेंस्ड
भाई तेजस MK1A कहीं भी कम नहीं होगा ग्रीपेन से,, उल्टा भारतीय मिसाइल और रडार उससे भी बढ़िया होंगे,,, फिर हम क्यूं विदेशी पर पैसा बर्बाद करें? Gripen के पार्ट्स अलग अलग कंट्री से हैं,, वॉर इमरजेंसी में कोन time to time प्रोवाइड करेगा? किसी पे भरोसा है?
तेजस mk-2 तो gripen से कहीं ऊपर का होगा,, राफेल F3r के जैसा सैमी स्टेल्थ होगा,, सिर्फ इंजन ही 1 होगा,,, 2 नहीं,,,
1. IAF Does NOT need any more heavy category aircrafts period
2. Probably few more squadrons of Rafale makes sense but no more procurement of new twin engine jets.
3. Top Priority should be to reduce dependency on Russia and slowly move towards indigenous and western jets.
4. For emergency procurement Gripen at right cost would be a very nice solution. I won't mind few squadrons of upgraded Mirage 2000s from Taiwan as well.
Import one squadron of everything
Good
What will be the internal weapon capacity of AMCA?
Will it be able to carry atleast 6 missiles internally?
4
Waiting for #TEDBF & #AMCA.
get well soon defence matrix bhai.. ur voice seems down today..
"Light fighters, are good in Defence and Attack in a #SmallArea. But #HeavyAircraft are good in range and for Attack. If you defending, Light Fighters are good but for Attack Heavy Fighter are still effective.
@defencematrix Actually twin engine jets have more power & radar dome.. so their radar detection range is more than small aircrafts. But as they also have huge cross section area.. so they get detected easily.. But they have more fuel, so they can carry for longer range & time air petrol than small..
Main point is bigger aircrafts use mainly for deep strike mission with heavy weapons.. Where small are better with border protection & interception..
But now medium twin engine aircrafts are performing better with small cross section area, twin engine safety, good power for radars, comparatively low maintenance & with moderate fuel & weapons load carrying deep air strike.. As standoff weapons getting too much better & higher range..
Thats why we procuring Rafael...
Rafale is a medium category aircraft
@@DefenceMatrix
Exactly.. Thats why we procuring Rafale..
@@shubhamgurav6145 yes, heavy fighters are the thing of past now, no country is working on future heavy fighters.
@@DefenceMatrix
Maybe..
But Germany & England creating their 6th gen jet design which is more heavier than medium class..
So.. I dont think heavier fighters need will go off easily...
@@shubhamgurav6145 they are medium category fighters.
JF17 is a 10th generation fighter..
better than teja samosa 69th gen maaak 69.0
@@ZarghamDaddy8293 that's why pakistan is the strongest nation in the world as its jf17 fighter has the most advance tech compared to any one .....🤢
Can you make a video on Su-34. No body talks about that plane. Why Russia never offered it to India or any other country? Thanks.
5:41
Ye su30mki mei yaha 5:41 pe konsa POD laga hai Fuselage ke niche ...
Plz.... plz. .. tell me
Litening pod
@@DefenceMatrix Can Su 30 carry Nukes??
Sir F-35 light fighter hoga ya fir heavy???
Plz bro make video on all anti aircraft guns of India.
My opinion is Heavy fighters can carry powerful radar which can detect enemy fighters much early and can fire bvrs before getting detected. yes bvr have improved but we need to remember that radars have also improve and now every fighter is aiming to carry aesa radar. the disadvantage of light fighters is they cant carry powerful radars because of single engine.
Tejas have 200km redar j10 have 200km redar jf17 block 3 170km
Gripen 200km
All are capble enough to fire any bv missile on these planet
Jai hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Happy bihu
Happy bihu from gujarat❤️❤️❤️
Hooga chaaka
@@megatron1560 happy bihu bhai
Mirage4000 looks good...
Heavy fighter are flown by heavy drivers
That's why Su 30 ran away from the fight on 27 February
@@abhilashyadav2274 it is manuever to dought bvr chutiye
@@abhilashyadav2274 😂😂 converted hindu ke bacche aagaye
@@xijinpingwinniethepooh9227 converted hindu??????
@@sadanandkumbhar9960 The whole world is converted Hindu. That's why India is backward as it remained Hindu.
Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
I like your music
10th boards canceled yyaaayyy
12th postponed 😂 😂
is there any freal igher jet equal to the Turbo Kat (from Swat Kats cartoon)?
2:08😜
Sir Mera ye question hai agr Russia Pakistan ko su35 bechta h to Bharat pr isse kya asr pad skta hai please comment
Miral ke kitne Series hote hain?? Miraj 2000 ke baad kon kon se fighters hain?? Direct 400
Medium Weight fighters are bridging the gap between them. Medium ones have the advantages of them. So, Air Forces are moving away from Heavy-weight fighters, instead go for Medium ones. Big example are FAF and IAF.
First like 👍🏾
Matrix bhau podcast
Can you make a comparison between hamvee vs mahindra alsv
There is still a big gap and that gap is radar, with 2 engines you can have a better radar and bvrs can do your enemy and heavy can have more bvrs than lights , you missed these points
That's why F 16 shot down Su 30
Heavy fighter jets jyada electricity generate karte hain isiliye inke radar ki range light fighter jets se bahut jyada hoti hai.
True and They also have bigger nose cone , hence More radar range.
That's why Su 30 was shot down by F 16
@@abhilashyadav2274 What the Fuck. It wasn't shot down ! Amrams were fired and they returned right back. ! I have my own family member working at the base . And he told me that only The Mig-21 was missing . Rest of them scrambled back.
Please tell definition of light weight , medium weight and heavy weight aircraft ?
Lightbweoght is small jet with only 1 engine which can carry some missiles less than medium or heavy.... Heavy fighters are huge jets with twin engines like f15 which is best for bombing a target as its payload is far greater than light combat aircraft and it can carry more missiles..... Thats why f15 and su30mki looks damn huge in front of f16 and tejas lca
@@megatron1560 That's my point , we don't have clear definition .
If light weight aircraft is suppose to be small in size , then what is maximum size limits for light weight , medium weight and heavy weight aircraft ?
If light weight aircraft is suppose to be single engine , then F 35 is also light weight aircraft . But maximum take off weight , empty weight , fuel capacity and engine thrust of F 35 is greater than double engine Rafale , Mig 29 .
I think criteria should be Max takeoff weight or Wing area or combination of both .
Alligator vs Apache
Medium wait fighter jet be like every day you are left just to suffer
Useless
heavy fighters do have a better survival chance of the plane as they can afford to lose one engine and could still fly or atleast give the pilot more time to eject before going down, while light fighters get a direct fatal explosion or fall if hit as they have only one engine to fly, heavy fighters also tends to have slightly to quite a bit more speed.
Although light fighters are easier to manufacture as well as maintain, due to the single engine.
ಜೈ ಹಿಂದ್ .🚩
🇮🇳
@@dkq986 🚩
Why TEDBF looks like Mirage 4000
Engine fail issue for light weight
Yes we asked China to make jf17 thunder for us just like Italy asked Germany , Spain and UK to make eurofighter typhoon for them 😏😏😏
Ever Heard Of DASA and CASA ?
I think Not 👍. That shows how much you guys know and what sort of wrong information you are given .
Do you have any idea how much DASA was involved . Just because England operates most amount of Typhoons doesn't mean that Germany sat down on the sidelines.
JUST LIKE Mig 21 ??
@@RohitRaj_0911 I think you didn't get my point
I meant that these 4 countries share production among them like BAE and DASA both shares 33 % production each 21% by aeritalia and 13 % by CASA
So in short just like they shares percentage of research and production work exactly the same way PAC and CAC share 52% and 48% production work respectively so it is a Co production of Pakistan and China just like eurofighter typhoon is a Co production of UK, Germany, Italy and Spain....
So it is not like Pakistan asked China to make an aircraft for Pakistan airforce....
@@MuhammadArif-xq1yw Actually yes. My bad. , I read you comment incorrect ! Apologies.
Why India Purchase Su 30 MKI in numbers of 232?? maybe 120 is sufficient and other 100 we can buy another light fighter what you think about too many numbers of su 30MKI.
They are useless.
Like wo shot down Ur heavy fighter Sukhoi from our F-16
For country like India ,heavy fighter is essential specially for protecting Indian ocean
Indian Ocean?
@@tyrantfox7801 He meant Pakistan Ocean.
Yes Indian ocean: lake of india
Sir ek question hai.... Kya hmare heavyweight fighters sufficient numbers hai china Aur Pakistan ko dekhte hue because china k pass Kariban 1000 heavyweight fighter jets hai (Su35 Su27 Su30 J16 J11 J20)
@@bayospirant277 what if the situation is only 1vs1
Unke paas 1000 heavy weight nahi hain 😑
@@satyaprakashmishra7147 count krke Dekho
@@bayospirant277 Hume sirf Pakistan aur China ko dekhna hai.
That would be more precise, I guess...
@@bayospirant277 yes 650 se jyada honge 1000 nahi
For me best Twin engine heavy weight category fighter are USAF F22 Raptor, Dassault Rafale. Eurofighter Typhoon, Russian SU 35, SU 30 MKK MKI, USAF F15 Eagle 2 n F18 super Hornet. Medium weight single engine category then nothing beats F16 Block 70 n F21 being offered to India under MMRCA.
India should buy everything.
Fighter jet jitna bada hoga utna bada radar fit Kar sakte hai bada powerful engine use Kar sakte jyada badi bvr missiles ko use kar sakte hai (Astra mk3) aur ground attck me toh mukabla hi nhi hai heavy weight ka light weight se.
Light with much larger number always more effective unless its just bombing mission.
0:05 song
Make video on S-400
It's overrated.
@@abhilashyadav2274 aahan .?
@@vedantsharma4709 Check out abishlash yadav comments in other replys. He commented fantastic tea. He is clearly a fake pakistani bot.
@@zil1832 Ask Abhinandan . He himself said the Tea is Fantastic
Okay pakistani bot.
👌
Are bhai light fighter jet jyada advance ho to medium Ho chahe heavy weight fighter jet Ho UN par light fighter jet ko age hogi kyunki vah halka hoga aur performance acchi hogi per usmein avionic aur vipin package advance ho to
1
So my question is kya AMCA jo 4.5 generation ka fighter hone wala kya woh heavy fighter hone wala hai ya fir light combat hone wala hai
5th Generation ki requirement se develop kar rahe he AMCA ko, Tejas Mk1A 4.5 ki electronic category me he.
@@bhavesh2232 mk1a main kya 4.5 gen electronics? Ghar py yeh gen Bana rahay hoo? No maws, no advance ew ecm, no datalink super dragy airframe,
@@aamerjamal we're making and testing these electronics upgrades in our 'HOME' as we produce our own AESA radar ,datalink, electronics counter measures systems in our own country unlike you.
@@bhavesh2232 You Guyz are trying to make these system so does we, only difference is we only announce something when we near completion or after completing it, btw we have our own data link and using it from 2010, we are working on bvr missiles and other sub system too, from AI to drones and Fifth Gen jet
@Aamer Jamal In recent comments you were saying " Ghar py yeh gen Bana rahay hoo? No maws, no advance ew ecm, no datalink super dragy airframe," we've been working on these things for years without reverse engineering. We announce our testings when things are done or they are in phase testing as public has right to know where their money is getting spent ,these is what Democratic countries do. And we've achieved a good success rate by doing decades of research. And yes we're aware of your programs ,your partner programs etc. We never denied your efforts.
👍👍👍
Sukhois are best heavy category jets
F15 ex and sukhoi mki both are best
Su 30 was shot down by F 16
Thumbnail -lightweight vs overweight
Couple of points I want to add here. First of all, the assumption that BVR Missiles are so elective now that close range fights are almost unnecessary is a complete wrong statement. That was the assumption since the introduction of BVR AAMS and it is yet to replace the guns and WVR Missiles. The most used BVR Active Radar AAM is AMRAAM and even when used against poorly equipped countries like Iraq, Syria, it has a success rate of 46% only. Those countries did not have any modern ECM capabilities and outmanned by US Planes at 10:1 ratio but still AMRRAMs success rate is very underwhelming even when helped by AWACS. Missiles are getting advanced but so are the Countermeasures. Example how SU-30 MKI evaded the Pakistani launched AMRAAMS. New Missiles like MBDA meteor, are yet to be tested against any modern aircrafts or airforces and those projected capabilities are theoretical.
Now regarding Heavy Fighters, that has a different role compared to a light weight fighters and just because they are heavy does not mean that they are less maneuverable or less capable in dog fight as that entirely depends on the design and engines of the aircraft. A Su 27 fighter, without any TVC, can outmaneuver most of the Teen series medium and light weight fighters, even without any weapon load for both. They are also used for different roles, like Deep penetration under enemy territory, monitoring the naval water, way far from the shore or even for guarding airspace of countries which are bigger compared to most of the European nations, like India, China or Russia due to their ferry range and they actually need less number of maintenance while patrolling airspaces. Because of the range, they can be modified to perform Strike Fighter roles like F-15 Strike Eagle or Su-34 Fullback which are strike aircrafts based on air superiority fighters. Our own Su-30 MKI is one of the best examples of it which can perform Air-to-Air, Deep Penetration, Strike Missions and Naval Monitoring against enemy airshipsb due to its fuel capacity, range, huge weapon carrying capacity and versatility of using different kind of weapons.
However, what I'm not sure why got missed here, is the weapon carrying capacities. A Light fighter can carry reasonable number of weapons but they are mostly air-to-air missiles. if you need an Aircraft which can carry wide range of Air and ground weapons in all weight class, you need either a medium or heavy weight fighter. Example is BrahMos integration in MKI. No Light weight fighter can have that integrated. These kind of integration can enable an heavy fighter to perform tons of different roles not possible by a Light Aircraft. Ultimately Aircrafts are not just there for fighting other aircrafts. Because of this versatility of medium and heavy fighters, you can see that Naval aircrafts are always of that category. There is no light weight fighter in Aircraft carriers in modern days.
We are forgetting, Meteor type SFDR with AESA seekers giving a longer No escape zone giving and more kill probability.
So yes we came too far from Semi Active radar guided missiles.
@@DefenceMatrix That is a theoretical specification given, not actually tested in warfare. I just gave an statistical data of most used Active radar Guided AAM which is not semi-active by the way.
And there are many ways to jam an AAM. The active seeker comes to play when it is very close range, around 20 km. Before that, the efficient way of jamming a BVR AAM is to jam its midcourse update channel. BTW, now a jammer can also be based on Phased Array technology and can jam wide range of Frequencies. May be checking some details about Rafael's Thales Spectre could give you some idea. It uses a Phased Array jammer which can jam the mid-course update channel of a BVR Missile. A missile's onboard electronics is not enough powerful to counter such advanced jamming in most cases and even a second of connection loss from the launching platform simply drives the missile of the course. High performance AESA Radars, like APG-81 can perform even Multispectral frequency Jamming against incoming missiles. Looks there is no argument about the capability of Meteor over other AAMs. But that will render close range combat useless is a too big of an statement. With the advancement in Missile tech, the countermeasure is also advancing, isn't it?
@@123Suryasis hello, the data which is out for the scored kills per launched missile is on all launches, not keeping the fact in mind from which ranges these missiles were fired.
The probability of hitting the target increases with the decrease in launching range, that's why missile have no escape zones.
Now with missiles like meteor which can sustain the speed for a longer duration, it gives an extended no escape zone which in turns increases the missile hitting probability, since the missile is not used in combat, so we can't say what percentage it will be, but there is no doubt about missiles better hitting probability.
Now about jamming missiles, definitely the jamming has improved with towed decoy and better jammers came into play, but so is the missiles ECCM capability, it's not easy to jam a missile from a particular range.
Jammers are good from a distance, not when you are close.
So, definitely we came a good distance.
We now have missile like MICA RF which are half the weight of Super 530D and almost gives twice the range, so now mirages can carry around 8 of them instead of two 530D they used to carry.
Also in combat you are not fighting alone, always in team and with heavy fighters also they will get more chances to shoot but it doesn't mean they will have an edge because light fighter can also carry sufficient numbers of missiles for an air combat.
And if you compare air package effectiveness with cost, light fighters will form a far deadly air package.
And about Sukhoi carrying Brahmos and ground attack weapons, we have mentioned that point already.
@@DefenceMatrix In a real War situation, in lot of cases, Missiles will be fired not at exact ideal situation, which gives a fighter opportunity to go close enough of the target aircraft to give the missile highest kill chance. The Enemy aircraft will also be targeting you and if get closer to give your missile a better chance, highly likely that you become a target of the enemy missile which will make you turn, hence dropping the mid-course upgrade. Can you show me a single modern day analysis claiming that the modern BVR Missiles have eliminates the requirement of close combats? That has been thought in many times and then was proven wrong in actual battle.
Now.
Regarding Light vs heavy Fighters, I am in agreement with you that in Air-to-Air combats, today's highly advanced light weight fighters are highly capable and can give heavy aircrafts a run for their money. I was stating that there are situations and cases where a Heavy or medium weight fighters have distinctive advantages and in some cases, they are the only choice. Also, it depends on the Country and their policy. NATO countries can opt with cheaper and lighter fighters because they know US, France or UK can provide heavy or medium Fighter coverage in numbers. But for countries like China or India, that's not the case and they need both type of aircrafts in certain numbers.
Best light fighters in the world are South Korean FA 50 and Tejas Mk1. Tejas Mk2 is being developed. When it comes to 4.3 gen medium sized or weight category fighter then nothing beats F16 Block 60/70 or new F21 offered to India bcoz 4.5 gen medium weight Rafales have never seen Air to Air combat. This is my personal opinion. Let see how this new F36 Kingsnake will be that US Military has ordered Lockheed Martin being developed to replace old F16. F36 Kingsnake airframe is dam good sexy n cool we have yet to see its technical details.
Haha
You are my favorite defence analyst ❤️❤️
Doesn't matter if you have a heavy fighter or light fighter , only thing that will matter is electronic warfare capabilities of awacs, fighters or ew aircrafts even if you carry meteor missile and still can't hit the target due electronic attack on your avionics than even a J-10 can outperform rafale
Every PAF and PLAAF plane can defeat Rafale
@@abhilashyadav2274 now that's pure sarcasm boi
Why russian jets do not have extra fuel tank .
They have huge internal fuel capacity (for the flanker family)
@@tyrantfox7801 not much
@@abhilashyadav2274
The flankers do.
3000km without refueling
Sir give me one chance
My 10th exam is cancelled
I was not watching matrix from 15 days as i was preparing for my board exam , now i am going to watch all his video in one day
So one year wasted?
@@rk-wy8pu knowledgeable kavi waste nhi hota
@@sauravjaiswal2956 Great,Continue your studies ,you dont know when exams will be declared.
Tejas airframe is so strong that it could withstand an Aircraft carrier landing....if Jf-17 landed on an aircraft carrier god knows what will happen to the aircrafts pilot...
Jf17 thunder ko aircraft carrier k lia nahi banaya
Touch down kar sakta hai jf 17 kiu ky arresting hook nhe hai us mai
Airforce Tejas won't survive carrier landings
Mig 21 airframe is so strong that the pilot gets a fantastic tea.
The F16 is not a light fight. It is a medium weight fighter like the FA18 and Rafale. Grippen mig 21 and JF17 also tejas are light fighters.
I think Midium fighter is better 🤔
Generally Speaking ! The Thing about Air To air dogfight missiles is , You getting a fighter jet in 1 missile is less than 50% and This Is for Today's standards . Saying that Radars have improved a lot , and Totally forgetting that Missile Jamming and Diverting technology by the aircrafts !
This goes both ways, but missiles are also coming with SFDR and AESA seeker with extended no escape zone and eccm capability, yes we came too far, talking about today's standard
@@DefenceMatrix Very True about the SFDR and AESA seakers being used in Missiles These days and I agree with it !!
In older days when Semi active seakers were used, the main thing used to be that The Missile Starts Tracking ( I think you'll know this). Once tracking then hitting the target had more than 50% probability .
Now With these latest seakers the Missile is More likely to track.. right ??
Absolutely . But your Point ends here ( for what you discussed in the video).
The Latest fighters such as Su-57 , F-22 have equally advanced radar jamming , Missile Diverting and track detach ablities . These have come a long way too .
Another thing , The No Escape zone is theoretical . There's a reason why These brand new missiles still have Proximity and Thermal sensors in them because A a fighter jet can Out maneuver a missile with right moves even in the So called no escape zone. Something you definitely know but I'll still write is that Missile are really fast and Poor in maneuvering( Small fins bro, no wings ) . That's why the sensors on Missiles and Flares to fool Missiles on jets .
So , Even the New Pilots today are told to Fire 2 Missiles at an aircraft , to confirm the Splash . The French still teach it and So does the Americans . 👍.
Thank You ., Big fan of your work . ! Keep making videos Sir .! Jai Hind 🙏
@@RohitRaj_0911 I have replied someone the same thing, let me copy paste it.
@@RohitRaj_0911 hello, the data which is out for the scored kills per launched missile is on all launches, not keeping the fact in mind from which ranges these missiles were fired.
The probability of hitting the target increases with the decrease in launching range, that's why missile have no escape zones.
Now with missiles like meteor which can sustain the speed for a longer duration, it gives an extended no escape zone which in turns increases the missile hitting probability, since the missile is not used in combat, so we can't say what percentage it will be, but there is no doubt about missiles better hitting probability.
Now about jamming missiles, definitely the jamming has improved with towed decoy and better jammers came into play, but so is the missiles ECCM capability, it's not easy to jam a missile from a particular range.
Jammers are good from a distance, not when you are close.
So, definitely we came a good distance.
We now have missile like MICA RF which are half the weight of Super 530D and almost gives twice the range, so now mirages can carry around 8 of them instead of two 530D they used to carry.
Also in combat you are not fighting alone, always in team and with heavy fighters also they will get more chances to shoot but it doesn't mean they will have an edge because light fighter can also carry sufficient numbers of missiles for an air combat.
And if you compare air package effectiveness with cost, light fighters will form a far deadly air package.
@@RohitRaj_0911 It depends a lot on the launching range and the KE left in the missile once the plane ( target) begins to do evasion.
Technology wins not Heavy and light Fighters
Kya IAF badi air force nhi hai?
Maybe
are bhai heavy weight 2 engine fighter jet desh ke liye achha hai jis desh ki sarhad jyada lambi hoti hai aur single-engine fighter jet use desh ke liye achha hai jiski sarhad chhoti hoti hai aur bhi bahut sare ismein sawal jawab hai batane ke liye