Paul Davies - Does Physical Reality Go Beyond?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лис 2021
- Are there revolutionary discoveries to be made in the deep laws of nature? Do radical revelations and shocking secrets lie ahead? Does physical reality go radically beyond what we know today? How far beyond? What could that mean? Can the bounds of the physical world get stretched?
Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Watch more interviews on understanding reality: bit.ly/3mrxjxj
Paul Davies is a theoretical physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist.
Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
Closer to Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
I was never scientifically inclined in school, so much so that I became an English teacher.
However, some 30 years ago a Paul Davies book about the possibility of parallel universes made me understand the concepts of physics and become an enthusiast of astronomy and cosmology. Thank you Mr. Davies for explaining so much so clearly to a lay man.
Best twelve minutes I've spent on theory in a long time. Brilliant thesis. Changes point of view. Thanks for the video.
I am not a physicist, just a curious man trying to understand at least this combination of abstraction and empiricism that define and demarcate the theoretical and applied contemporary work of scientists in Physics. In this sense, I found this interview one of the most objective and clear explanations of the alternative trajectories faced by physicist theorists today, although in a very basic, short and simple presentation.
Movement in spacetime is the common denominator of “everything” -
even entanglement
@@ronclarke154 isn't consciousness the cd of everything?
@@ronclarke154 Everything IS in motion friend but I don't think it's reasonable to conclude that motion itself is something fundamental.. I realize you called it a "Common denominator" and THAT'S true enough, but the electrons that carry the kinetic energy derived from motion, is more fundamental and also a common denominator of all matter..A humble opinion.
@@Bill..N Only consciousness is fundamental, Consciousness is the computer.
If it wasn't for consciousness, no one, or thing, would know the universe existed. Imagine many universes, all glorious, but no consciousness anywhere. That would be a terrible shame, because of all that glory for no reason - pointless. All unaware.
But our consciousness is finate, so it could all end in unawareness again one day.
It's incredible that anything is here at all.
lol You assume quite a lot, such as that consciousness is finite or that anything could be separate from consciousness.
Define consciousness
We are these multiverses what would exist if you didn't or I didn't
@@pobinr I define consciousness as the ability to have a subjective experience. If it is like anything at all to be you then you are a conscious entity.
@@peterhaag9344 You're simply defining one word with another
I’d never heard of him before, but he has a new fan. He exemplifies why I always find people who love, down to their very core, the work that they do, so attractive (not in a sexual way); they radiate this love for the topics they discuss that is palpable and you can’t help but be drawn in. In many ways it’s as if the person and subject are inseparable, and they lay what they know at the world’s feet for others to love, but without expecting them to. Of course, they’re human, but they always seem so steady and there’s a calmness to them, unbothered and spared the innumerable tiny affronts that most of us are forced to contend with day in and day out because they have their passions to attend to. I can’t help but admire a life like that.
But I couldn’t help but grin throughout the video at his ,almost unreal, throwback posh English accent that may or may not have been plucked straight from central casting lol. I half expected him to say at the end, “I dare say, I should fancy a long and winding walk along the edge of the lake after all that. It is a rather fine day. Mr. Kuhn, do you agree?” 😝 😂 🇬🇧
Oh man you need to dig into his books
This is almost the best interesting and informative program on UA-cam.
Thank you for this one Paul!
Excellent one!
I got more from this than I had anticipated. Cheers
this is amazing!
..this crunches my mind like a velvet sledgehammer.
I met Prof. John Archibald Wheeler (1911 - 2008) in 1991 in his office at Princeton. I predicted then saying this to him: that his students would continue to win Nobel Prizes in Physics. Finally, after his death Kip Thorne won the prize in 2017. Of course, Wheeler would have been 106 years-old if still alive and probably not available to go to Sweden. It was his book Gravitation, which first introduced me to the Einstein tensor and more. RIP
We're a pinprick against the unending expanse of infinity. We're the only ones that will ever even know we had an existence. And if we go extinct, well there goes it all.
Really, Wayne?
Are you an atheist?
Would you say you are science-literate?
Not sure about middle part of your post but agree with first and third points.
Don’t say it! I pontificated at length about why we are not…. Just pinpricks. Lol. But yeah, if we go extinct it is a big deal. To me, anyway. 🤔😂
This is the first physicists have seen in years today actually agree with. I strongly suspect that information is primary antecedent if you will. Our biggest predicament is that we don't seem to pay any attention to the fact that none of this would exist for us without the faculty of conscious observance. Until we are able to understand the functional nature of consciousness itself everything that we perceive is fundamentally an interpretation based on incomplete information.
This is such a good channel
I like what he said! Yes, based on our information already exponential explosion of possibilities from the inside!
I. ❤ Paul Davies
Good vid this guy is a natural teacher .
They say when we see the light from the stars its from a star that died something like Thousands of years ago. So with quantum physics with particles being so small, the spatial density is actually increased between the observer and the observed including a curvature of space-time , So perhaps the reason why physical laws break down with quantum physics is that you’re actually looking into the past when the laws of physics were different
Stars live for ~billions of years. The ones you see tonight are (probably) all still there.
Big radio telescopes can see faint light from very far galaxies, and even farther to the CMB. Observations show that physics hasn't changed since the CMB at least. (Or, changed so little that it's not detectable over 13 billion years.)
@@bozo5632 But the overall point is that possibly the tiny size of particles and our observation of them is a parallel in perception As it relates to space and time , to seeing something in a far off distance. If time is changed by distance, the scale of particles as it relates to larger objects like ourselves may represent distance in a form of destiny of space between the two. This may calls a time differential when we observe tiny particles from microscope
@@MrSanford65 This my thoughts on this too, what we see out there, in space. Could it be the same as what we look at through a microscope. That would explain the box theory. Yet the box theory according to the way I understand it to be is pretty much infinite ♾ in either direction, big to small, small to big.
Interesting idea.
Whay about electromegnatism 1000 years back ? Were there any usage of that force then...especially electronicism
The are two fundamental things in the universe. Wine and cheese.
Plus wine glass 🍸
So far, trying to understand reality has been like trying to find the heart of an artichoke. Elements > atoms > protons etc. > quarks etc > strings. But that's only regular matter. Then there's dark matter... The deeper or more infinitesimal we get, it's, "But wait, folks. There's more!"
Always liked Paul..he's such a breath of fresh air from windbags such as Sean Carroll and Brian Greene
england v usa
What's wrong with Sean Carroll? I like Dr. Carroll because he is an atheist and a great physicist.
What goes beyond physical reality is supernatural or spiritual reality which is a forbidden knowledge so that the forces of darkness can not win.
Right...🤣🤦♂️🙄
Yes.
Wwwwoooowww! Check out that FINAL statement Paul Davis makes‼️
I would suggest to anyone, who at the very least, is embarking on understanding these mind bending concepts within the wide arena of theoretical physics & its branches influencing all of applied sciences, a common profound direction that Paul Davies is introducing & postulating herein. Firstly, we should take one moment to commend Robert Lawrence Kuhn’s relentless pursuit in his long running, “Closer to the Truth”. But that aside, as a lay person but who tries to honestly test the edge of my aptitudes, see if you agree. Are you getting this underlying theme we are hearing from the likes of Lennard Susskind, Ed Witten, Alan Guth, Andrei Linde, Lee Smolin, Robert Laughlin, Eric Weinstein, Nima Armani-Hamed & others? Does your undivided attention agree with what is common to all their most recent talks? What you ask? A total break down of time & space as an emergent property? That our 3 +1 world view reality is indeed projected from an encoded 2D brane? That the wave function doesn’t collapse nor does it branch off into an infinite number of universes within Hilbert space. That there may be another solution to the fine tuning problem. And these three examples simply scratch the surface of a much greater profound paradigm shift forthcoming?
Can something that had / has a beginning be Infinite ?
To acknowledge something involves a potential change in what is acknowledged... A basic rule that applies not only to human mind, so this may apply to the universe itself, sure, why not? We're made of it afterall.
And the computer creates/ retrieves information for the user
that fell out of the math
The infoermation was created outside of the computer not by it
Couple of years later they just gonna turn around and say "we were wrong thinking Physics was last word" as if we all believed them in the first place
In the case that time and space switch places inside black hole, might time be a positive energy density and space a negative pressure inside the black hole (and potentially outside universe)? In which case going from outside to inside universe, how might time go from positive to negative energy density and space from negative to positive pressure? (The other situation going from universe past event horizon into black hole, how might space go from positive to negative pressure and time go from negative to positive energy density?)
Wow I haven’t got clue what you said but it makes sense, and could it be that we really wouldn’t know if we were in a black hole or not, just certain things would happen in such away that we would all just lose our minds with going through one of these.
There are many new forces yet to be explored
_"There are many new forces yet to be explored."_
Name one.
@@twitherspoon8954 do a sane person name some thing which is not yet explored
@@pakistanzindabad9257
You asserted there are new forces which have not yet been explored.
That implies that there are new forces which exist (and have not yet been explored).
So, name them.
Finite universe, wow! Thank you. 💕
It's still rather big though.
Neither Paul nor ANYONE else knows if the universe is finite or infinite friend.. These are merely Paul's PERSONAL opinions and leanings on the matter which is FAR from scientifically settled either way..Peace.
It is both information based and less than 3 dimension based, as everything solid is merely a one dimension thread, woven with vectors of information to form a knot of a 3 dimensional particle. What separates the one d line from the three d object is mere information attributed to it. imho
What is beyond? The Real is Reality and Reality is The Real. It is just that the purpose for the (perception of) plurality is Love.
An appealing theory to be sure..It raises a plethora of new mysterious questions and considerations..Loved it..
It is conjectured in idealist philosophy and NDE survivalist phenomenology that nonlocal consciousness extends beyond time and space. Thus the heat death of the universe does not preclude the continuation of thoughts in immaterial consciousness. Consciousness could survive entropy.
Bottom line--we will never have a final "scientific" theory or an full explanation of the laws that govern our Universe. The nature of time and it's speed/expansion and the distance of the accelerating horizon, will forever make it impossible to reach a scientific conclusion which is acceptable to the physics community. Only Philosophy and Theism can pull together the most acceptable final theory--science can't get there. Davies is a great interview and a masterful speaker--a very interesting guy and a rational Scientist. His book "What's Eating The Universe" may be one of the best reads ever--highly recommended--it makes you think through all known possibilities. The only part I disagree with Davies on, is the notion that we should drop the possibility of an external influence--yes that is a essentially faith based model and since we cannot ever "get there" physically (I see how he feels that way) I just don't like closing the door..
Excellent stuff Robert!
No offense friend, but starting with your FIRST sentence you make a continuous stream of highly dubious assertions that you can't POSSIBLY support or know to be true.. Subsequent conclusions are therefore merely unsupported claims of SPECIAL knowledge..
@@Bill..N how so Pal? you are at odds with the vast majority of scientific leaders then--we can't even catch up to the observable horizon much less decide what's close to the far reaches of the universe and certainly NOT beyond--in fact the big bang is disputed by many and CANNOT be proven--science cannot now or ever explain a final theory--but since you are so sure, explain it to us all here.. Are you smarter than Roger Penrose or Leonard Susskind?? Do you have a way to exceed the speed of light billions of times over? Waiting.. of course you could be God??..
@@evanjameson5437 You're on a different wavelength entirely.. You're default position shouldn't be to act out on assumptions or to exercise misdirection...My SIMPLE point is this.. What we presently "Know" about theoretical physics will be superceded and very different a few centuries from now.. Therefore one should be reticent to make assertions as though they are factual.. Scientists like Penrose OR any other physicist worth their salt , never claim THEIR ideas are the right ones..Unless you have secret evidence to the contrary, neither should you..One opinion..
@@Bill..N You have to concede this: there is no conceivable way to ever test through experiments "with final resolution" the theoretical physics that science implies--an impossibility.. There's NO misdirection coming on my part friend--in regards to final theory (or answers to "why") factually we cannot ever get there, it's an impossibility--the best science can offer is very small/tiny clues with no final theory or provable conclusion--yet many physicists speak with such authority to the public as if they have it all figured out--which in itself is actually the misdirection you worry about.
@@evanjameson5437 It seems we are generally headed in the same direction with our arguments then.. EXCEPT, I think it's entirely possible that new insights CAN potentially provide answers that you now declare to be impossible..Even IF they cannot be directly measured in the CLASSICAL physical sense..Declaring limits on the capabilities of science has not turned out well in the past .Peace.
(5:00) *PD: **_"Imagine_** enveloping the whole universe in a 2-dimensional surface."* ... The operative word is *_"imagine"_* (or "Conceive").
If you strip away all of the physical structure of a 3-dimensional cube, what remains is the 2-dimensional geometry that orchestrates its structure. If you strip away all of the 2-dimensional geometry, what remains are the 1-dimensional reference lines that orchestrate the geometry. Strip away the 1-dimensional reference lines, and what remains are the 0-dimensional points (mathematics) that orchestrate the reference lines.
It follows that if you strip away the 0-dimensional points (mathematics), what remains is a non-dimensional *Consciousness* that is able to *_"imagine"_* (or "Conceive") the 0-dimensioal points (mathematics) that orchestrate the 1-dimensional reference lines that orchestrate the 2-dimensinoal geometry that orchestrates the 3-dimensional structure of a cube ...
... just like _you_ did after reading this comment.
I’m finding it difficult to strip away one dimension from three to yield two, or the reverse. Nor can I envision stripping another dimension from two to make one.
I am, on the other hand able to conceive of the informational core embedded in a pollinated embryo to form an apple, out of thin air, water, and sunlight. But that process seems to me to bypass one dimension, and two dimensions, to proceed directly to three dimensions, existing (ephemerally) in the fourth dimension of time.
@@MendTheWorld *"I’m finding it difficult to strip away one dimension from three to yield two, or the reverse."*
...I'm confident you can reduce a physical, 3-dimensional cube down to 2-dimensional geometry (or construct a 3-dimensinoal cube from 2-dimensional geometry) via consciousness. And if you can do it at this upper level, then you can follow the same logic all the way down the dimensional hierarchy.
*Example:* Conceive a cube. Open any mainstream 3D modeling program, plot eight equidistant 0-dimensional points via mathematics, join all eight points with 1-dimensional lines to form a 2-dimensional representation of a 3-dimensional cube. Save your "conception" in .STL format and print it out through a 3D printer's miniscule .25mm diameter _portal_ (analogous to "singularity").
*_Behold!_* ... You just created physical, 3D structure straight out of your consciousness!
*"I am, on the other hand able to conceive of the informational core embedded in a pollinated embryo to form an apple, out of thin air, water, and sunlight."*
...That's because you, me, Paul Davies, Robert L. Kuhn, and _apples_ are all biodimensional representations of consciousness that seeks to understand the nature of existence. The movement from inanimate structure to animate structure is just as much a dimensional property as moving from lesser 2-dimensional inanimate structure to higher 3-dimensional inanimate structure.
When you conceive existence in this manner, the mysterious evolution of "sentient life" from "inanimate structure" suddenly makes perfect sense.
Oh,, wise guy,,huh? What about all the bio electrical wave propagation of our consciousness that will be thrown outward into the universe over the entire dimension of time.
Human thinking and thought, the moments of our lives recorded for all time. Same as the cell phone works.
We are just at the begining of it all. Hard to know it's real.
@@tracemiller9628 lmao you're like a child responding to a professor. Do you really understand what he's saying or are you just being pointlessly competitive? Stop flexing your ego and you might finally learn something new someday.
I agree the laws of physics were much different in the beginning, 'fuzzy', and have developed over time into what they are today. They did not exist before The Big Bang, ready to be applied to matter. The problem is how did anything come into existence in the first place
The answer to your last, how did anything come into existence in the first place. Your own imagination 💭. Give a listen to Neville Goddard, his work is on UA-cam as well. Actually you could probably look up Neville Goddard imagination. I’m guessing it will bring it up in those keywords.
Either our understanding of physics is right. Or space travel would be a nightmare, if not impossible.
Could time move towards things inside universe as the universe is expanding everywhere inside?
If we could make a determination of how many demintions there are it would seem we would be making significant progress.
Infinite .
@@jarjar3143
Could be, what a strange reality that would leave us with.
Why does everyone in this comment section act like prophets?
Because the topic of this channel is speculation.
Because that's all they've got.
Apparently the laws within is the tradition of the Greek Orthodox world, that emerged in Medieval and Ottoman era that supplements and expands Classical and Hellenistic Philosophy.
The video says the opposite. That all religions are based on an entity called "God" beyond and outside the universe and that this idea of a god that imposes "laws" from outside should be abandoned. Maybe except Buddhism, since Buddha was not a "God" ,haha
05:29 We're all living in a computer program on someone's 2D screen 🤣🤣
You may say it glibly but rapidly simulation theory enhanced recently and gaining strength, you see matrix is not a subject of a movie since Eastern religions assumed centuries ago...
Both! You need to have them both from the outside and the inside to fully understand! The answer is just „yes“
How do you KNOW your assertion is correct friend..? While many of us mere mortals have differing OPINIONS on the issue, YOU claim to have special knowledge of the truth..How can you defend that position?
@@Bill..N i did not claim anybody would be special! I just claim the answers are in plain sight but everybody playing „unworthy“
Its like curiosity kills the cat has 9 lives but they gave up before losing even 1 sometimes
No you didn't claim any one was special, but when one makes assertions of fact regarding a matter without evidence, THAT constitutes a claim of special KNOWLEDGE.. It's a philosophy thing friend..No personal offense intended.
@@Bill..N bro we do not know each other personal, so is sometimes hard to contribute to ones own believe system in a short comment but i stand my ground about this.
Information is meaningless without consciousness.
Or is consciousness meaningless without information?
Or are both meaningless and it is only the pattern-matching programming in our brains that believes there is or, at the very least, must be meaning?
@@con.troller4183 Not only in our brains. In the entire Universe.
@You are correct But
Yes. Information is only meaningful to the type of consciousness it is relevant to.
Consciousness is meaningless without information.. You're welcome.
Existence cannot come from non existence , therefore existence never began . Existence must know that it exists therefore existence must be conscious. Eternal conscious existence !!!!!!!!!! Our universe , our planet , our lives , were created by eternal consciousness . This is where eternal consciousness spends eternity !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Eternity is the answer to all our questions !!!!!!!!!!!!!
You're right! You can check this out also: ua-cam.com/video/EsfPa5qW9_c/v-deo.html
There definitely is eternal consciousness.
Some people stating that "consciousness is fundamental" seems like the blatant observational bias of a conscious being.
Beyond physical matter there's psychical, or subtle, matter. And as we perceive physical matter by our physical senses, so we perceive psychical, or subtle, matter by our psychical senses.
Inter-dimensional ghost neutrinos, popping in and out, yeah!
I see them sometimes.. I thought I was the only one
@@mikebar42 Wait.. what?
Reality is the objective world (space and time - four dimensions). The mind (subjective space) may be thought of as the fifth dimension. Each individual has their own private, unique view of reality in this fifth dimension. Our knowledge base in this fifth dimension is every bit as complex as the physical world.
Thus, each human individual has a unique reality comprised of this five dimensional construct. Knowledge can be thought of as the totality of all human thought and is not constrained to only the human mind.
The purpose of the universe is to provide a vessel for intelligence to express itself.
We are all based on the same model with tight constraints. Like a finger print, they are all individual but its still based on the same model. When we go beyond that the model begin to have problems.
i used to laugh at people that consciousness may have something to do with this but it might actually be the case.
it just might be the reason that things happen. i think the problem occurs when there is no living matter around. time behaves unstable or something. time without living matter is not compatible. does your death take you to another bang? we'll never know.
because death, for the dead person, appears to be a corrupt state to be in... a realm minus time.
but how can your death be permanent if there is no time?
@@anthonycraig274, please explain. What is the model? What problems?
12:00 “I’d like the watch to assemble itself without the watchmaker.” “I’d like the book to write itself without an author.”
We don’t care what “you’d like,” sir. You’re being illogical in what “you’d like.”
In physics terms.. we live inside of a blackhole or within the event horizon outside of a blackhole. Same same ultimately. We're looking at an image that is flat which confuses flat earthers.
Quantum Computing?
I understood better the second time, he is introducing a radically new vision of the world with refining maws from within, pretty Awesome.
It’s just a test or game for all emerging conscious intelligence, entertaining something truely bizarre
Consciousness is experiencing itself in this creation 👀
Marlene!!!
I remember reading somewhere that back around 1900 they thought there was nothing left to discover in Physics, maybe it was Science in general.
How wrong were they then?
In the 1700's, astronomer Guillaume Le Gentil is said to have declared that once he had observed and reported the 1796 transit of Venus, all great the questions of astronomy would have been answered. While it sounds arrogant it was not laziness. Having missed the 1761 transit due to ocean storms he remained in South East Asia scouting a location for the 1796 transit. He built a small observatory but on the night of the transit, the sky was overcast.
The expedition lasted eleven years and upon his eventual return, he found he had been declared dead, his wife remarried and his estate devoured by ravenous relatives. And he never got to make the final, c rowning observation in the science of astronomy...
When you peer down a microscope, things get smaller, when you look outwards with a telescope, things recede and the universe appears to be expanding. It's consciousness trying to examine iself, but it cannot be pinned down.
Ok, look at the box theory. How do you know that you are not looking at the same thing, weather you are looking through a microscope or looking through a telescope. Your just perceiving time and space from 2 angles.
😳
mr paul davies,don't get afraid INFINITY anymore...just accept It,respect It and of course LOVE It!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!................>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
But if we are comparing the universe to a black hole, in which information is finite, surely we can also use our knowledge of black holes (here at least and the only ones we know) to say we know that they come in many sizes and we know that there isn't just one, but many! Extrapolate that out to the universe and you end up with a multiverse.
What hes asking for is essentially Wolfram Physics
Ask me - I know where to start ;)
🌴😎💯
Maybe outside beyond the universe is like inside event horizon of black hole?
He reminds me of Peter sellers
Jacobs ladder information instead of the brane
Lchaim from Jacova born March 11th in a Bethlehem. My Hebrew name Jacova is the female form of Jacob. I even worked on the editing of Jacob's Ladder with Tim Robbins and Danny Aiello. 11.2.2019 Brian Tarantino, an actor from Jacob's Ladder died in apt 11. Last role Jackie in Mrs. Maisel. Lchaim from Jacova aka Jackie. God aka Elohim Adonai Hashem has a sense of humor.
P.s. you cannot reverse entropy. It offers options.
Would you believe that I am the ultimate particle or being and everything else is my experience you are here to adorn me with knowledge and experience
It's fascinating to see how much bs we can conjure up once we no longer have to struggle for daily survival.
ain't you happy for that?
@@joel230182 If you feel good being a human garbage bin. Remember that there is someone that have put you there and that is taking advantage of you. Nothing is for free.
I've a PhD in art history. Wish I had had a mind for physics. If all is emergent, maybe in the next incarnation...
I loved art history which I took in my first semester. The only difference between a physicist and an artist is the mathematics. Both require imagination.
@@nyworker I taught art history as if I were teaching young people how to think, how to live, how to make choices. I hope. Now I write literary novels! ("Saltine" Otis Books, 2021)
5.42 “If that is true…” It IS true… 3D is 2D, 4D is 3D, 5D is 4D and so it goes…
Why are some people so understandable when they talk, even when they are talking about something so incomprehensible?
So you are saying you understand what you don't understand. That's great ! One step forward, two backwards
Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
This guy is a cross between Tom seleck and Bruce Forsyth
Wow, the pillow guy is super-smart.
The fact that particles pop in and out of existence means there is more to discover. Maybe more dimensions and their properties
Could you please indulge me with a quick answer of where one can find evidence of particles popping in and out of existence? Thx.
@@MendTheWorld I was quoting Neil Degrasse Tyson. However, this is not correct as he isn’t a quantum physicist. When we look at an atom, we are only taking a snap shot of a wave. From our (human) perspective electrons appears to be a particle, when really its a wave. We cannot observe the wave when we look at it, we only see the probable position of the wave which we perceive as being a particle. Therefore in one position its observed and another position of the wave its not. So it doesn’t pop in and out. Thanks for querying
Go beyond were ?
quantum is because stress of work yet if work done early to calm relax because too much is simple brainwork eventually hospital life monitor chart
Yes, absolutely. Reality is heavily censored.
This reminds me of the Hebrew word for "face," which is _panim._ Because Hebrew is all consonants with vowel markings placed under the letters, the word _panim_ can be rendered _p'nim,_ which means "internal." The idea is that this same set of consonants expresses two opposite concepts; external and internal. The face conceals the contents behind that face.
@@sonofblessed Imagine we would invent a special new word for every idea that comes to somebody's mind... This is why we use concepts instead of new words, like poker face, for example. What we do is described in a sentence. A face is a face, facial expressions reflect inner mental workings, so we don't need a special word for that self-evident property.
Ancient languages are kinds different, because language was still in development and many symbolic words were disregarded latter, when people discovered they don't apply to anything real or useful.
Since God is an eternal being how isn't he, outside of this universe that is in a Time dimension.
Who said it's not
Finally people are starting to take the holographic universe idea seriously
The very laws of nature and physics is all-powerful, omnipotent and indisputable. Scientists and physicists are constantly learning more about the absolute laws of nature. Scientists and physicists are constantly learning more about God.
The surface of a black hole is 3d isn't it?
It's not flat is it
black holes wrap spacetime and bend light so why not be 3D?
We should stop referring to black holes as “black hole“
It’s just not an accurate description
You should call it something like a quantum phase sphere or something 🤷🏻♂️
Fuzz balls, it's a real term
Your right not black at all because these objects are gravity condensed into a force
@@dondattaford5593 what does that even mean? Gravity is already a force.
@@omnipotent1992 condensed at extremely high levels converted into matter
Gravity is not a force, it is a bend of spacetime bro
NTS good/65/use
Our universe is finite …
NOT infinite because
infinite Does Not compute.
"Nothing" is also a postulated state of being, an amount, which we cannot possibly observe. I can at least conceive of infinity as "being", "existing".
Sure it does. Pi is computable even though expressing this exact quantity requires an infinite number of decimal places.
Tghe universe is not olbligate to grant your wish that infoemation is created in the void
I will answer this question. All constants of physics, all masses of particles, all parameters of the universe are there. Aren't you tired of idle chatter about this instead of the development of science? Start with Argazi's theory of time. Or create your theory of time at last. Or at least listen to Lee Smolin's advice on understanding time.
Simulation Theory for the win!
I loved this. I loved everything he said except the speculation he had about the origins of the natural laws. He didn’t get that right at all. I was like 👍🏻 for most of it. Why does he want so badly to throw out “god” notions? That position Paul spoke of is actually more religious and faith-based in the context of information and consciousness.
I argued in my first book that not only is god the best theory of everything, when you re-define god and all history in information terms, but it is also the most coherent theory with the most predictive value far beyond any other discrete theory thus far in human inquiry. It’s like making a periodic table from mystical alchemy. I began the process in my first book 20 years ago (The Textbook of the Universe: The Genetic Ascent to God) and predicted the intellectual history of the last 30-40 years with it. Because that’s how things HAVE to work!
It’s frustrating to me because I thought about all this stuff long ago and wrote about it in my first book and all my papers and presentations over the years. It’s a huge compliment to him that I am frustrated because I can’t even get to the point of frustration with most people 😂 🤷♀️.
I realize now that people don’t get that I love Paul Davies far beyond human words. To me, it’s inherent in what I say. But I want to be clear on the LOVE. ❤️🔥✊🏻🚀 It seems stupid to have to say that to me. But people hang on words like 3-toed sloths in a sky full of eagles so there you go. 😂🤷♀️
I am writing a second book updating a lot of the predictions and applications for black holes and modern cosmology. Most science and inquiry describes things, but I can tell you much more than that. That’s why it’s frustrating. I made a whole new paradigm. Like Thomas Kuhn talks about in his very truthful and accurate book.
Before the FoxP2 gene people could not have come this far. That sort of thing. I am supplying the next level revolutionary leap for humanity. So it’s frustrating when the most intelligent people on Earth are so saddled with cookie-cutter educations. I wasn’t. It has been quite a struggle not to be. A miracle really. Anyway, once I finish the new book people across the earth will know me, not a pleasant prospect for me because my reticence is part of how I was able to keep thinking beyond sociocultural structures and interpersonal patterns for the duration combined with starting out very different as well. Not caving in to literally everyone over the years. It feels like exposing myself to the zombie apocalypse emotionally when I think about it because my life has never been worth more than truth to me. I understand fully how rare that is in history and how people do not think or experience that way.
The main issue is that people hear the words I use and they automatically think certain things because of the old definition and old paradigms. That’s why they need to really listen overall instead of trying to “classify” what I am saying because I am speaking about things beyond normal human classification at this point in history.
So I am trying to address this issue in my new book. People don’t understand what words are so it’s difficult for them to re-define them. Our educational system gives rewards to the proper responses to the proper symbols and this means more neural pruning and a loss of ability to entertain the new-like an internal “Great Wall” or something. Not that I’m a Hun, Lol. But I have lots of ideas to re-introduce life into that particular rigor-Mortis. And it is indeed a symptomatology of death in the primary information law of the universe I talked about clearly in my first book which basically no one read… 😐🤔 I can give you a whole new set of laws for the interaction of life and the universe. I have given a few of them already in my first book but there are many more across levels of scale and between ideas and matter and stuff. I can tell you what dark energy is too. Might help with figuring out how it can be described physically and that sort of thing.
However, sometimes it gets daunting because of all the wrong views people have. They want to instrumentally carve the world up into nice little lever-filled theories in the now to press to get things and do things to make money, compete, prestige, yada yada. It’s mostly unconscious I guess. But pretty glaring to me. but sometimes you need to stop rationalizing your myopic focusing and lever-pressing so you can get out of the box, from behind the wall, and do what is necessary to survive long-term for which all levers were ultimately fashioned anyway. I am sure that sounded confusing but it is because of the paradigm shift which is necessary at this point in history which you have not done yet because no one will give me a freaking couple of hours to talk with them and see where and why they don’t understand. I don’t think like they do so it’s important to interface in this manner.
It’s definitely the key to eternal life for humanity and civilization too. Civilization is basically a pattern forming in the collective unconscious which is an infomation structure to get us over internal evolutionary hurdles. Once you know that, everything becomes clear. Let’s just say that in the long run global warming is an external manifestation of larger issues with the information body of life. It’s not the real issue. Even though it IS a real, current issue. Anyway I am not going to talk about politics because that’s what corrupts the natural education and information processes of history. Furthermore, I can see you there right now thinking this is a hidden political theory and a re-casting of known things. Because you don’t understand that these things I just talked about do NOT mean what you think they do. So I can’t really talk about anything without misunderstanding unless I can explain the whole deal. Thus frustrating. However, you can completely understand wars and political persecution and religious wars and persecution via these ideas. All sides of these conflicts. That’s why they are conflicts. People don’t understand. Thanks 🙏🏻
Thanks Dr. Kuhn, for your awesome efforts and tireless curiosity ❤️🔥🚀 Like in Ray Bradbury’s “Frost and Fire” I see that shining thing on the hill. By this humanity will find peace. By this we live or die. I am currently the only person voting for life with my life so I am frustrated because everyone votes but they are not free to think and know clearly. Like was famously said: those who think they are free but are not are least free of all. Between the idea and reality is the shadow. I dream of coherent light. ❤️🔥
God,, is the simplest and easiest way to understand why it exists at all.
We are first step of above, yes, what is the next step and the next step.
What will we be in 259k years
A human egg fertilized and gestated in zero g, the r raised in zero g, living it's life in zero g.
Is it possible? Is it a step up?
We have not even scratched the surface of what is possible yet.
@@tracemiller9628 😳 Wow!!! ❤️👍🏻
The last one to discover is quantum mathematics
According to Choi Tae-gun's theory of everything as a South Korean, the physical reality of black hole thermal radiation is the warm dark matter, which forms the gravitational field of black holes.
Why would the dark matter be warm? What temperature is it?
But there is very, very little black hole thermal radiation, and there is seemingly very, very much dark matter.
@@bozo5632 According to Choi Tae-gun's Theory of Everything, dark matter is the smallest fundamental substance in the universe.,And thermal radiation is a warm dark matter that forms a star's gravitational field, which is the physical reality of entropy that always increases according to the second law of thermodynamics.,This is why the surface area of the black hole's gravitational field increases.
@@hyegang3491 So, he thinks hot objects should have more gravity than cold objects.
Is this guy a physicist? (Is he you?)
@@hyegang3491 Really? Where is the new heat continuously coming from in your "thermal radiation"?
11:55 panentheism
Well that’s an awful conundrum of a pancake
Dude just stepped out of 1979
Atomic, subatomic, space and time, strings . What about explaining resurrection of Jesus.
_"What about explaining resurrection of Jesus."_
LOL
You know he didn't exist, right?
@@twitherspoon8954 There is a ton of historical evidence that refutes your statement.
That was the heaven-to-universe interface mechanism. It's proprietary technology.
@@ronaldmorgan7632 .
We humans love to use our brain to explain incredible mystery of Universe. It will take us nowhere.
We are prisoners of time, even 100 years of life it’s a blink. To fantasize, if we could travel 1000 times faster than speed of light 186.000 miles per second• 1000, it would take 120 years to cross our Milky Way, and 120 years to come back.
By evolving ( through Grace) our Soul ( get rid anger) when we die physically, then Soul is ready to understand higher dimensions.
Jesus is the example.
@Nisha chambiyal . St Paul olso was hallucinating. Educated Jew by famous Rabbi Gamaliel. Did see Christ. Enough read New Testament.