@@God-Emperor_Elizabeth_the_2nd No no, it is already paying off, the fact ur here commenting shows that. Yt algorithm started recommending this channel like crazy. They gained 40k subs since yday
In Shakespeare's time the profession of lawyer was quite different than it is today--or in more modern times since he wrote those lines. in fact, lawyers did little or next to nothing in matters of defense since almost all the work of trying a case was in the hands of JUDGES. It only came about much later that lawyers were ALLOWED to speak on behalf of the accused! Perhaps, because of the foregoing explanation, Shakespeare found lawyers of his day USELESS, and therefor could be DISPENSED with.
As a former liar, oops lawyer, I thouroughly enjoy your many very witty, well researched, very deep insightfull handling of topics. I'm also amased at the excellent animations in a breathtaking 14 day pace at such truely excellent minimalistic to the point way! Thanks!
Ironically, we have lawyers to thank for adding to what little official records we have of Shakespeare. He was involved as a witness in a court case involving the owners of the boarding house he stayed at, though because this case was years old by the time he was called to testify, he couldn't remember very much that was relevant. However, given that there's precious little verifiable records of Shakespeare, this one court case gives us something by an official government source. It's not much, but at least it can verify where he was at a particular point in time.
Will realized that the best way to keep "ego" in check was to gently mock it. He didnt hate Lawyers anymore than anyone else does - but he was honest and not afraid to keep them in place . He used his "Superpower for Good"
This is a super fair take on this bit of history! I hadn't read or heard of the possibility that Shakespeare could have been a practicing lawyer prior to becoming a playwright.
You missed the obvious link between the Thomas Moore author of Utopia, which is being referred to by Jack, and the fact that he was a lawyer (and was executed by Henery IIV)
I think you mean Thomas More, a lawyer and former Chancellor to Henry VII. And yes, author of the strange book "Utopia", which seems strange musing on what a secular "perfect State" might look like.
@@nigachu8249 the worst enemies of a simpleton: the people who tell you what’s going on in the world, the people who represent you in the justice system, and the people trying to make change for their constituents in a democratic society.
I think Shakespeare was wise enough to recognize that lawyers are there to stand up to the tyrants and tell them, ''You can't do that! It's against the law!'' and especially to those that abused their authorities to get what they want for their own quotas, especially the ones who have to receive only a six month training to do that.
If only that were true, if only that were true... Any good Tyrant will handpick the people in justice and as far as the everyday scenarios go, whoever has the money wins. Lawyers are scum.
That might be possible. Unfortunately, given the high amount of false convictions, police using deception to get you arrested, which they're allowed to do, btw, the amount of scummy prosecutors hiding evidence from defense lawyers which would've acquitted the innocents, and the TERRIBLE public defender system, as well as the amount of legal and attorney fees you had to pay, what you say about whoever has the most money wins isn't far from the truth. But that is how unfair the US justice system is. And given how many defense lawyers that worked their hardest to get people that were forced into the system out of it, the generalization of all lawyers being scum is far from the truth.
Ironically though Lawyers also play the other side; getting evident crooks off the hook with whataboutisms and other mechanisms for sowing doubt / misrepresenting evidence and testimony. That; and they also will protect those they suspect to be the villain of the situation, just because said villain pays well. So really; one could say a given Lawyer is a 50/50 case of saint or serpent, until their actions demonstrate which of those they are... or something in the middle.
A lawyer by definition doesn't stand up to anything. It's a soulless automaton designed to uphold the law, and the law is simply what the strongest force around says it is. Lawyers can work for good or for evil, but they're neither, their entire task is devoid of morality and conscience, it's to coldly apply words dictated by those stronger than them.
@@dwight3555 You're half-right on your definition. Prosecutors are lawyers designed not to stand up to governments, but to prosecute people for the government. However, we also have lawyers that challenges the prosecution: Criminal defense attorneys. If you want an example of how a lawyer can attack the government for their client, watch this video: ua-cam.com/video/ZtIeg-rdIlU/v-deo.html
"Oh yeah thieves, yes you all. Make some room over there for the *second glance at the list*... Lawyers" - Rowan Atkinson I think this is from a stand up comedy he did as the devil "Toby as his nickname commonly" for lining up sinners at hell.
So Shakespeare didn't like lawyers or unicorns? Who the heck doesn't like unicorns??? Lol Great video, as always. Please keep the outstanding videos coming and God bless you, my friend!
Law is actually pretty complicated, convoluted, and has a tendency to be based upon the insane ideas and actions of individuals. If you have ever heard of a weird or obscure law, there was undoubtedly some incident that made that law seem like a really good idea at the time. And it's amazing what people will draw connections between and therefore decide to do. Any profession that makes a pretence of involving human beings requires insane and sometimes stupidly creative thinking.
Case in point: The English law that makes "The suspicous handling of fish in a public place." An arrestable offense. This is an actual law written some time in mid-Medieval period and has not been stricken by modern England. At the time it made sense. English (along with most of Europe) ate enormous amounts of fish, particularly on Friday and especially during Easter (Lent). It was a very common and tragic tactic of criminals to poison fish and cause mass sickness or death. The law made it so doing anything weird with any fish would automatically get you arrested. By the late middle-ages the consumption of fish decreased in favor of beef and thus the relevance of the law diminished as well- yet it's still on the books. For a more modern example: here in the US a lot of states have laws that make it an arrestable offense to eat a very **specific food** in public. These food laws are old and date back to a time when eating, say, peanuts in public might agitate a farmer's chickens or something so it made made illegal.
only Architects come to my mind who always want their clients to be rich , open minded and well educated. many other professions want you in trouble or sick.
Amazing video ☺️ I would say that the argument "kill the lawyers, solve the problems" is undoubtedly wrong. The opposite would be quite correct though, 'cause lawyers live in and with problems, and if you eliminate all the problems you won't have a need for them anymore. Unluckily, it's the most ancient dream, and at current time it's not been realized yet, so I'm afraid and ashamed to say that we will need lawyers for another while
As long as humans continue to have different understandings about anything, no matter how peaceable they are, you're going to want lawyers and judges to make an arbitrary ruling so that you can't be resentful at each other.
His father was a thief he obtained 8,400 lbs of wool illegally, all his misdemeanours are on Wikipedia to read that’s where I got this info, I checked because I had initially thought he had stolen sheep but it says he obtained wool not sheep so maybe I was wrong nevertheless he was a rogue
If human beings didn't have desires - and weren't selfishly preoccupied with their desires rather than the common good - then laws wouldn't be 7000 pages long 3 days before they were to be ratified.
@@HolyKhaaaaan The laws are designed that way because the average human won't take the time to read it, let alone be able to remember it. I have read parts of 42 U.S.C. Then looked up words in Blacks Law Dictionary to see if they meant what I thought they meant and the didn't. Not many people know but there is a law that says any laws written must in in a manor that the common human can understand, they disregard this law and use our ignorance against us. You don't need a law 7,000 pages long to say you can't do this or you will do this.
There have ALWAYS been "commies" it's just that sometimes they get listened to and sometimes they don't The most famous communist in English history was...ROBIN HOOD!
Absolute personal equality has been a wet dream for lots of very sick people over the centuries. A large swath of Christian heresies before the Protestant Revolution were very egalitarian.
You tried valiantly to make a counter-argument, but the argument that Shakespeare supported law and lawyers is much stronger. Another example of his use of law is when his actors took apart their theater and rebuilt it as The Globe on the south bank of the Thames.
Some context might help. Shakespeare's fellow actor Richard Burbage and his family owned a theater cleverly named The Theater, which was built on leased land. When the lease ended, the owner, Giles Allen, refused to renew it. He planned to use the building for something else. The Burbages instead dismantled The Theater, transported the timbers across the Thames, and used them to build The Globe in 1599. Giles Allen was furious at losing the building and initiated several lawsuits against the Burbages, and lost every one of them.
@@pacificostudios He literally explains in the video how Shakespeare didn't hate lawyers nor law, even possibly being involved in being one at some point in his life. The only thing he may have shown was a lack of respect for the individuals practicing it.
Too much analysis. Lawyers back then all worked for the rich to the detriment of the poor. Shakespeare has his lower class rebel expressing what a lower class rebel would most likely have said.
Not much different now tbh. Only difference is that Lawyers have greater chance to profit from supporting the poor against someone wealthy than they did in the past. Doesn't stop a team of lawyers from making mega-corps untouchable in a court of law though.
Let's be honest, lawyers are mercenaries for hire, assholes, not fucking knights in shining armor that come to help you free of charge. You could be defending people for the good of the state or for your personal beliefs as a public prosecutor with those skills but you rather charge people for their right of freedom and their ignorance of the law. Even if they are innocent, also where poor people get a prosecutor, corporations exclusively hire lawyers. Really it should illegal to become or hire a lawyer, it just opens the balance of justice to wealth disparity and ensures corrupt assholes get preferential treatment in the eyes of the law. It just fucks up the whole process of a fair trial.
@@weetdirt It shouldn't be a matter of money who gets what lawyer, or worse having a full harvard legal team vs a single man and a barely graduated defender. Last year amazon avoided their taxes trough legal loopholes, because they could aford the best defence, making them that much richer. Now a man that has been strugling to pay the bills because he suffered a work related acident, won't have any respite and will be cheated out of his lawfull retirement without a lawyer to represent him. This is not justice, it's a unspoken cast system where the rich have greater rights than the poor. All laywers like judges, should work for the state and be assigned to cases by chance, only then you can have a fair system legal system.
This has high production quality for a small subscriber base. Good work.
It’ll pay off. They just have to rough it out for a few years until the right person with people who listen to them comes along
@@God-Emperor_Elizabeth_the_2nd No no, it is already paying off, the fact ur here commenting shows that.
Yt algorithm started recommending this channel like crazy. They gained 40k subs since yday
@@verySharkey about 60k in the last week.
@@verySharkey yep, got the recommendation yesterday
couldnt agree more
In Shakespeare's time the profession of lawyer was quite different than it is today--or in more modern times since he wrote those lines. in fact, lawyers did little or next to nothing in matters of defense since almost all the work of trying a case was in the hands of JUDGES. It only came about much later that lawyers were ALLOWED to speak on behalf of the accused! Perhaps, because of the foregoing explanation, Shakespeare found lawyers of his day USELESS, and therefor could be DISPENSED with.
"He may have worked as a lawyer"
YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO DESTROY THE LAWYERS, NOT JOIN THEM!
"From my point of view the Judges are evil!"
You have become the very thing you swore to destroy
As a former liar, oops lawyer, I thouroughly enjoy your many very witty, well researched, very deep insightfull handling of topics.
I'm also amased at the excellent animations in a breathtaking 14 day pace at such truely excellent minimalistic to the point way!
Thanks!
Ironically, we have lawyers to thank for adding to what little official records we have of Shakespeare. He was involved as a witness in a court case involving the owners of the boarding house he stayed at, though because this case was years old by the time he was called to testify, he couldn't remember very much that was relevant. However, given that there's precious little verifiable records of Shakespeare, this one court case gives us something by an official government source. It's not much, but at least it can verify where he was at a particular point in time.
Hoorray!! A SideQuest upload!!
I've been addicted to your videos recently, thank you!
Will realized that the best way to keep "ego" in check was to gently mock it. He didnt hate Lawyers anymore than anyone else does - but he was honest and not afraid to keep them in place . He used his "Superpower for Good"
Cringe take tbh.
This is a super fair take on this bit of history! I hadn't read or heard of the possibility that Shakespeare could have been a practicing lawyer prior to becoming a playwright.
You missed the obvious link between the Thomas Moore author of Utopia, which is being referred to by Jack, and the fact that he was a lawyer (and was executed by Henery IIV)
What?
I think you mean Thomas More, a lawyer and former Chancellor to Henry VII. And yes, author of the strange book "Utopia", which seems strange musing on what a secular "perfect State" might look like.
Damn jack sounds a lot like a Bolshevik
1) make the strongest alcohol widely available
2) no more capital
3) in jacklandia no one has stuff
Great, informative and a high quality video
Amazing video - love the details in this. More please!!!
We only interact with lawyers during negative experiences, applies to a lot of hated professions at the moment :/
Yup. Cops, doctors, etc.
Weather men...I am from Denmark..
Everyone hates a Lawyer until they need one.
Then they hate them even more.
"Why did Shakespeare hate lawyers"
Probably because he was a human being...
I use to be a advocate bro now I in procecution
@@kartiktiriya2612 fed
Tell me you know nothing about lawyers without actually saying it
I hate lawyers, reporters and politicians the unholy trinity.
@@nigachu8249 the worst enemies of a simpleton: the people who tell you what’s going on in the world, the people who represent you in the justice system, and the people trying to make change for their constituents in a democratic society.
I'm shocked that this channel is still small. Amazing facts, great story telling and wonderful animation.
This channel went from below 100k subscribers to above 200k in 2 weeks
I think Shakespeare was wise enough to recognize that lawyers are there to stand up to the tyrants and tell them, ''You can't do that! It's against the law!'' and especially to those that abused their authorities to get what they want for their own quotas, especially the ones who have to receive only a six month training to do that.
If only that were true, if only that were true... Any good Tyrant will handpick the people in justice and as far as the everyday scenarios go, whoever has the money wins. Lawyers are scum.
That might be possible. Unfortunately, given the high amount of false convictions, police using deception to get you arrested, which they're allowed to do, btw, the amount of scummy prosecutors hiding evidence from defense lawyers which would've acquitted the innocents, and the TERRIBLE public defender system, as well as the amount of legal and attorney fees you had to pay, what you say about whoever has the most money wins isn't far from the truth.
But that is how unfair the US justice system is. And given how many defense lawyers that worked their hardest to get people that were forced into the system out of it, the generalization of all lawyers being scum is far from the truth.
Ironically though Lawyers also play the other side; getting evident crooks off the hook with whataboutisms and other mechanisms for sowing doubt / misrepresenting evidence and testimony.
That; and they also will protect those they suspect to be the villain of the situation, just because said villain pays well.
So really; one could say a given Lawyer is a 50/50 case of saint or serpent, until their actions demonstrate which of those they are... or something in the middle.
A lawyer by definition doesn't stand up to anything. It's a soulless automaton designed to uphold the law, and the law is simply what the strongest force around says it is. Lawyers can work for good or for evil, but they're neither, their entire task is devoid of morality and conscience, it's to coldly apply words dictated by those stronger than them.
@@dwight3555 You're half-right on your definition. Prosecutors are lawyers designed not to stand up to governments, but to prosecute people for the government.
However, we also have lawyers that challenges the prosecution: Criminal defense attorneys. If you want an example of how a lawyer can attack the government for their client, watch this video: ua-cam.com/video/ZtIeg-rdIlU/v-deo.html
"Oh yeah thieves, yes you all. Make some room over there for the *second glance at the list*... Lawyers"
- Rowan Atkinson
I think this is from a stand up comedy he did as the devil "Toby as his nickname commonly" for lining up sinners at hell.
Oh I remember that one :D
Lawyers also bend reality to the rules, just to the rules they're set with.
Your unicorn metaphor gave me a good laugh.
The unicorn one got me laughing
Every time he starts talking I think he is going to break into the V for Vendetta monologue
Perhaps he might knew that a corrupted lawyer is as bad as a corrupted king/minister. Because they able to bend the law for themselves.
Discovered this channel today and I have subscribed 👍
Shakespeare topics are always a mystery
Just a comment to drive engagement. This channel needs more subs!
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
American law is ridiculously byzantine. Ten times more so than the original Byzantine law.
Who doesn't hate lawyers?
Criminally undersubscribed
Thank you. - A lawyer
great work bro
why dont YOU hate lawyers is the real question.
Great content!!
2:15 that red hat was no accident
This is great I did the merchant of Venice he seems to have a fascination with lawyers.
This is going somewhere big
So Shakespeare didn't like lawyers or unicorns? Who the heck doesn't like unicorns??? Lol Great video, as always. Please keep the outstanding videos coming and God bless you, my friend!
4:19 That's not a very good comparison, don't ask me how I know that.
Woah, this channel gained 10 thousand subs since I looked at it last night.
I think the lawyer gig was as you said, a minor joke, and easy laugh
Lesson learned: don't kill the lawyers, kill Law
Law is actually pretty complicated, convoluted, and has a tendency to be based upon the insane ideas and actions of individuals.
If you have ever heard of a weird or obscure law, there was undoubtedly some incident that made that law seem like a really good idea at the time.
And it's amazing what people will draw connections between and therefore decide to do. Any profession that makes a pretence of involving human beings requires insane and sometimes stupidly creative thinking.
Case in point: The English law that makes "The suspicous handling of fish in a public place." An arrestable offense.
This is an actual law written some time in mid-Medieval period and has not been stricken by modern England.
At the time it made sense. English (along with most of Europe) ate enormous amounts of fish, particularly on Friday and especially during Easter (Lent). It was a very common and tragic tactic of criminals to poison fish and cause mass sickness or death. The law made it so doing anything weird with any fish would automatically get you arrested.
By the late middle-ages the consumption of fish decreased in favor of beef and thus the relevance of the law diminished as well- yet it's still on the books.
For a more modern example: here in the US a lot of states have laws that make it an arrestable offense to eat a very **specific food** in public.
These food laws are old and date back to a time when eating, say, peanuts in public might agitate a farmer's chickens or something so it made made illegal.
uuuugh screw you youtube algorithm for not favoring this awesome channel
Who doesn't hate lawyers though
I’m going into one of the most hated professions. Woo Hoo!!!!
Go into patent law.
Just to be clear: So we shouldn’t kill all the lawyers?
only Architects come to my mind who always want their clients to be rich , open minded and well educated. many other professions want you in trouble or sick.
Amazing video ☺️ I would say that the argument "kill the lawyers, solve the problems" is undoubtedly wrong. The opposite would be quite correct though, 'cause lawyers live in and with problems, and if you eliminate all the problems you won't have a need for them anymore. Unluckily, it's the most ancient dream, and at current time it's not been realized yet, so I'm afraid and ashamed to say that we will need lawyers for another while
As long as humans continue to have different understandings about anything, no matter how peaceable they are, you're going to want lawyers and judges to make an arbitrary ruling so that you can't be resentful at each other.
I especially appreciate the extra layer of meaning at 2:13
'lawyers are crooks who don't do anything but get guilty guys off' is a sentiment that almost certainly predated mr Shakespeare
His father was a thief he obtained 8,400 lbs of wool illegally, all his misdemeanours are on Wikipedia to read that’s where I got this info, I checked because I had initially thought he had stolen sheep but it says he obtained wool not sheep so maybe I was wrong nevertheless he was a rogue
He bought and sold wool without a license. He was never accused to stealing anything.
If we didn't have layers we wouldn't have laws that were 7,000 pages long.
If human beings didn't have desires - and weren't selfishly preoccupied with their desires rather than the common good - then laws wouldn't be 7000 pages long 3 days before they were to be ratified.
@@HolyKhaaaaan The laws are designed that way because the average human won't take the time to read it, let alone be able to remember it. I have read parts of 42 U.S.C. Then looked up words in Blacks Law Dictionary to see if they meant what I thought they meant and the didn't.
Not many people know but there is a law that says any laws written must in in a manor that the common human can understand, they disregard this law and use our ignorance against us. You don't need a law 7,000 pages long to say you can't do this or you will do this.
why is there a town in ontario named shaksepear
What if he hate inself?
I didn’t know there were commies in Shakespeare’s plays.
There have ALWAYS been "commies" it's just that sometimes they get listened to and sometimes they don't
The most famous communist in English history was...ROBIN HOOD!
Absolute personal equality has been a wet dream for lots of very sick people over the centuries.
A large swath of Christian heresies before the Protestant Revolution were very egalitarian.
Doesn't everyone?
Who don't? Even lawyers hate lawyers.
You tried valiantly to make a counter-argument, but the argument that Shakespeare supported law and lawyers is much stronger. Another example of his use of law is when his actors took apart their theater and rebuilt it as The Globe on the south bank of the Thames.
I can't tell if you're making a joke or not.
@@Spartan322 - No joke.
Some context might help. Shakespeare's fellow actor Richard Burbage and his family owned a theater cleverly named The Theater, which was built on leased land. When the lease ended, the owner, Giles Allen, refused to renew it. He planned to use the building for something else. The Burbages instead dismantled The Theater, transported the timbers across the Thames, and used them to build The Globe in 1599.
Giles Allen was furious at losing the building and initiated several lawsuits against the Burbages, and lost every one of them.
@@Jeffhowardmeade - Thanks for clarifying this. I had forgotten the exact details, other than that The Globe was built from parts of another theater.
@@pacificostudios He literally explains in the video how Shakespeare didn't hate lawyers nor law, even possibly being involved in being one at some point in his life. The only thing he may have shown was a lack of respect for the individuals practicing it.
I mean who doesnt?
I never read Henry VI.
Who doesn't?
I mean, this should have started with "aside from the obvious reasons that cause everyone to hate lawyers." Missing the easy layups here Side Quest.
This is defiantly not a comment to lure the algorithm to spread this video.
How interesting.
Hey, what's with the MAGA hat at 2:14? Are you trying to imply something?
It’s a red cap - MAGA isn’t written on it. Look for an argument elsewhere and just enjoy the video
Brown shirt manipulating a marionette with a red hat.
NOTHING TO SEE HERE
Trump lost lol
@@plmkoo6772 how you feeling right about now.
@@milliereynolds165 ah yes a cap very renaissance or ww2 definitely not a modern thing possibly talking about modern politic at all nnnooo.
B.S. artists are not a “necessary evil”.
Nice b8 mate
Who doesn't
Portia was a good guy, but she wasn't a lawyer. Just impersonated one.
Interesting, but you seem to conflate lawyers and legislators a few times
Kill yes yes exactly my thesp ❤
Very beautiful❤❤❤❤❤
Shakespeare is irrelevant in the equation most lawyers hate other lawyers enough said
Because he wasn’t stupid.
Lawyers - Lawful Evil
No lawyers are lawful neutral
@@mariodangelo9768 nope. Definitely lawful evil.
@@mariodangelo9768 - It heavily depends on the lawyer.
I recall that Dickens wasn't too keen on them either.
"The law is a ass." Oliver Twist (1838)
who doesn't hate them?
I say we send all lawyers to ask Shakespeare if he likes them. Probably the best way to solve the problem.
Too much analysis. Lawyers back then all worked for the rich to the detriment of the poor. Shakespeare has his lower class rebel expressing what a lower class rebel would most likely have said.
Not much different now tbh.
Only difference is that Lawyers have greater chance to profit from supporting the poor against someone wealthy than they did in the past.
Doesn't stop a team of lawyers from making mega-corps untouchable in a court of law though.
Because they were breathing
He was just trying to be edgy.
I dislike lawyers; A lot. HATE isn't healthy🙂👍
Glad to see you kept your political baises from spilling over into future vidoes
Make your videos longer. My attention span is good for a solid 20 minutes. This 5 minutes deal just isn't working.
I can't be the only one who thinks he is a hack
👍
SIR YOU SHOULD BE A MEME HOPE FULLY IF I USE YOUR PICTURE YOU WON'T MIND 😜
Do you need a REASON to hate lawyers? I thought that was just the default.
Watch Amber Heards Lawyers and you will know why.
Implying the answer to the Jewish question won't solve all our problems. 🙄
Why wouldn't he?
The underlining political biases here in the animation are annoying and take away from the objectivity of the video.
@@ヴァリ-z3e, okay cultist.
@@mrh4900 I’m anti Biden but anti trump
@@mrh4900 😂😭💀
How...?
Implying Brexit is too simple an answer spoiled the video for me.
Tell me who doesn't hate lawyers, based Shakespeare.
Because he was a smart man.
In Shakespeare's time, it was the lawyers, today it's the DENTISTS
Dentists aren't hated? Some people find them useless for some reason but don't hate them. Lawyers still get way more hate than dentists.
Most dentists are scammers that due useless fillings, veneers, and teeth cleanings
My reminder to have my teeth cleaned was never delivered by a deputy sheriff... yet.
You wouldn't hate the dentist so much if you just learned proper hygiene. Lol
Let's be honest, lawyers are mercenaries for hire, assholes, not fucking knights in shining armor that come to help you free of charge.
You could be defending people for the good of the state or for your personal beliefs as a public prosecutor with those skills but you rather charge people for their right of freedom and their ignorance of the law. Even if they are innocent, also where poor people get a prosecutor, corporations exclusively hire lawyers.
Really it should illegal to become or hire a lawyer, it just opens the balance of justice to wealth disparity and ensures corrupt assholes get preferential treatment in the eyes of the law.
It just fucks up the whole process of a fair trial.
It should be illegal to...study law? Is that what you're saying?
Public defenders are lawyers too.
@@weetdirt It shouldn't be a matter of money who gets what lawyer, or worse having a full harvard legal team vs a single man and a barely graduated defender.
Last year amazon avoided their taxes trough legal loopholes, because they could aford the best defence, making them that much richer.
Now a man that has been strugling to pay the bills because he suffered a work related acident, won't have any respite and will be cheated out of his lawfull retirement without a lawyer to represent him.
This is not justice, it's a unspoken cast system where the rich have greater rights than the poor.
All laywers like judges, should work for the state and be assigned to cases by chance, only then you can have a fair system legal system.
lawyer hate is universal
1