the real reason why many governments, including the American government, want to disarm their population. It's easier to tax the shit out of someone if you know they don't have the ability to resist you when you come to forcibly collect.
Actually it's pretty easy since the wages of sin is death, so all the money lenders have to do is to invade and get killed and they would have gained what they where owed as ordained by God almighty himself.
It is interesting. I'd honestly like to have that in grand strategy RTS games, since could be neat Alternatively, a video on how the colonies and how the UK handled debts during the revolutionary war could be neat, like did they have rival tax collector's attempting to get funds from the same places
It also sort of help that in the case of the British, Conqueror and creditor were often one in the same. In fact conquest being the result of not paying said debts, such as in the case of Egypt 😂
@@mandalorian_guy Newfoundland was it's own dominion for a while in the early 1900s. Went heavily into debt, bankrupted, and had to have the British directly rule them again.
There's an old saying in finance: "If you owe the bank a little money the bank owns you, if you owe the bank a lot of money then you own the bank." If a conqueror were to not pay back the debts of the nation it conquers then the nations that are owed money might be getting inclined to go to war with the potential conqueror. An example of this is world war I where the United States bought up enormous amounts of French and British bonds but then ultimately entered the war on behalf of the French and British because America needed them to survive so they would pay America back.
or, in a similar vein, the Habsburgs having so much debt with the Fugger family they were able to practically force them to give them more loans so they wouldnt just stop paying the old ones
I do wonder how the world would be if equity financing were used. 20% of my income for 10 years for $100,000, etc (much higher for a king who had more assets).
@@cookednick doesn't really matter, becuase America does include both North and South technically, so it's no fault of Brazilians if they also include themselves in the Americans.
There's also the story of what happens when a country radically changes its government. I recently read a story about how the Soviet Union didn't honor debts from the Czar. It wasn't until the Soviet Union fell and the Russian Federation came into being (and wanted access to foreign debt markets) that they agreed to pay off these old, 100 year old bonds from the days of the Czar.
Newfoundland (1949) and Texas (1845) were forced to join Canada and the us, respectively, partially due to debt. I think the Newfies couldve pulled a proto-MMT argument and just "printed" their way out since it was during the Keynesian era, though most countries were on the Bretton woods.
@@리주민 MMT relies on fiat currency. The entire theory is that demand for the currency can stabilize it allowing for monetary and fiscal expansions. You just have to not expand so hard that inflation ensues. Breton Woods would make even a proto MMT impossible because you would have to devalue your currency relative to gold or risk monetary crisis over a long enough period of time.
The thing about Texas is the US never assumed its debt, the State of Texas was fully liable for that debt, and settled it in 1850 by selling eastern New Mexico and southern Colorado to the Federal Government which paid off a majority of the debt.
On the other hand, quite interestingly the US assumed ALL of Mexico's debt to Americans (roughly $3 million) in addition to the $15 million cash for the land that was annexed.
I do not think the state of Texas was fully liable for the debt. I think it was an opportunity for them to grow and expand even more. If you check Mexico’s Texas map to the map of US’s Teaxas of today…..Texas is much SMALLER back then, than how big it is today. These claims were just an opportunity to grow into a bigger state with more influence. Which makes sense because the people of Texas of back then always seek to take advantage of anything they could take. When Texas was part of Mexico, Americans violated many laws such as taxes, trade and slavery. Slavery been the one that Texas kept having the most trouble with to the point its a major reason for it revolution. Many states of Mexico and the Mexican government kept telling Texas that they are braking the law. Such as you cannot make children slaves. Or forced slaves to have babies and then have baby slaves. Mexico enforced laws into Texas that such babies are free and cannot become slaves and any child bellow the age of 14 must be freed. They enforce these laws since the they would not obey the initial law that….you cannot own slaves since slavery is ban in Mexico in the first place. Also they were terrible ta paying taxes or more like unwilling, which is hilarious because the American independence began with, “No Tax without representation”. And yet they wanted representation after braking so many laws, no paying taxes and force people into slavery. The conclusion is that Texans of back then just were opportunistic that took any advantage to increase their wealth regardless of how inmoral something was. Texans even participated for the confederacy in the civil war to keep their slaves. In the treaty of Guadalupe was in huge favor of the US were they made them look like good victor and Texas decided to take advantage of the situation to increase it size and influence. But then again its not like the US is the first or last country to invade another country, then make itself look like a noble winner, there are plenty of European countries that did that several times. I just wanted to impose since the state of Texas was not justified in any claim, nor the US. Like Hawaii, they just overthrew their government and then annexed to the US. Or Alaska, were they pay a foreign power which was about to retire because it was too expensive for them and they did not had control on the region completely in the first place. I actually was surprised that during WWII that the US did not claimed half of Japan or any south east asian country that was invaded by Japan. But then again putting military bases is less costly than having to govern territories that are so far away. Just look England, France, Portugal and Spain. They are prime examples of trying to do that.
@@rotamrofsnart No it really isn't for a channel that's been going on this long doing some hard work compared to all the other crap you see on the internet getting millions of views, this is actually VERY underrated
As one historian said, English Kings had a long habit of borrowing large sums of money from both its own subjects and foreign creditors. What Cromwell introduced was the innovation of paying them back.
Basically, taking on the conquered debts grants legitimacy with the creditors (Typically very powerful people). Legitimacy with powerful people is what allows you to get away with conquest. Damn, got the urge to play EU4 now.
@@vinsonsidhartain a way you could say coring does that. You use Administrative power. And the amount of possible loans you can take decreases if your economy stays exactly the same or gets worse as before the annexation. But yes it isn't really represented in the game.
France - "Let me have those debts." *reads debt list, which mysteriously references something about future events and something called "the German Empire"* France - "Oh dear, what have I done?"
I stumbled on this video and i didn't expect much but this is one of the best animated history vids ive seen. What was even more surprising was it having less then 100k views. I feel like i found some holy grail few are privileged to see!
These videos always feel way longer than they are. And I mean that as a compliment! You pack so much into these videos that I feel like I’ve sat through a whole long video essay. Bravo on your fact-filled succinctness!
This video reminds me of a saying I heard while working in IT -"There is the right way, the wrong way, and the IBM way". I also came to learn that your can switch the word "IBM" with any huge organization/corporation such as GE, government, military, state of California, etc. that tend to have their own ideas and methods of getting things done.
That impression of Queen Victoria was the best part of the video! Lol. I love the way that you mix so much good information with great sense of humor and fun narration. Just such a great video and channel. Please keep the outstanding videos coming and God bless you, my friend!
your videos are so interesting and well put together, with original style and historical focus. I assume you're a team of people -- I hope you get the following you deserve in order to sustain this quality.
Very interesting. The bit about the bond holders becoming millionaires got me thinking about all the generational wealthy people we have today. It would be interesting to see exactly where much of their wealth came from.
@@namvo3013 They can, indeed, try. If they succeed they're wealthy(or wealthier). The reason it's relatively simple to remain rich is you can keep investing in safe bets, along with risky ones without any real danger. If I put $10,000 into a random start up company and they went bankrupt, that'd have a pretty measurable impact on me. Not to mention not really doing all the much for them(depending on size and expenses). If a billionaire invested 5 million dollars, it wouldn't have much impact on them if they lost it, but it is a significant boost in funds for a small company. And if they do relatively well the billionaire will make quite a bit back. They can afford to do this many times. If even one company become a major success, they'll be up millions, or even billions as an early investor. Meanwhile for my 10 grand, even if it becomes the next Amazon, I'd be lucky to retire on it.
@@SelfProclaimedEmperorAnd even those few who made their own fortunes in business did so with inherited seed capital. Elon Musk, for example, walked into a fortune from a South African mining empire.
Borrow money, build a decent place to live, wink suggestively at your next door neighbour and get invaded. You do a runner and the land is all the better for it.. Kind of
I thought you would explain Ottoman debts too. That was an interesting subject. Not only Turkey paid those debts, also the countries that born from Ottoman too paid those debts
@@kmmmsyr9883 Yes Greece was in debt over 100% when it was first formed to pay Ottoman debt and the debt for the arms / help given by the allies that helped them win their independence
The taking of debts rom conquered territory brought a sense of continuity and legitimacy. Bacially, what do you want? To pillage the territory or take it and make intitutions of goverment? Short term vs long term.
How does paying the Devil his due increase your legitimacy? I can only view someone as a real and moral leader if they tell the moneylenders to go back where they came from, which is Hell since debts are the tools of the Devil which he made to trap men and corrupt their hearts.
@@skitidet4302 So what you are saying is that invading another country and killing their people is fine. Lending money from those who have too much to build a better infrastructure for those who have too little is wrong. This kind of hypocrisy is why I hate Christians. What kind of twisted mind do you have if you think killing poor innocent people is fine and making their lives better is wrong?
Dang, British weren't screwing around. "You inherited their debt." "Cool, I'll pay it with your head." Honestly that's how I was expecting 90% of this to go. People just warring over debts.
If you (as a king) don't pay those debts, do you think private individuals/societies will finance your future businesses with new debts? Me as a moneylender surely not because you can't take some rules of this system but not the nasty ones.
Did not expect to hear my countries name on the second ever video i played on this channel😲 but im really happy i did, greetings from Serbia 🇷🇸❤️ this channel is amazing
@@WizzardJC well most unique thing about us is the language as we follow the rule "write as you hear,and read as it is written,one letter,one voice" for example saying "where am i" would be written as "ver em aj" if english language followed the same rule.tbh most people i explain the fact that each word can be changed in 7 different ways depending on the conversational circumstances,people really get confused about the variations,but it is technically a 3rd grader stuff here that everyone learns easly lol. junky cheetah here's your name written through these variations: junky cheetah,junky cheetaha,junky cheetahi,junky cheetah,junky cheetah,junky cheetahom,junky cheetahu it would probably be a little different if i converted text of j to џ and y to i,but instead i just changed the ends of the sentence as thats really the only thing that changed through variations.
Cannot believe a history buff like me has been missing out on this channel. "Theres the right way, then there's the German way, you know..." Well done good sir 🎩
@@shaggyd00kale58 It seems like a derivative of a classic US military adage, "right way, wrong way, army way." The idea was that regardless of if it was right or wrong, you'd end up doing it the army way, because otherwise you'd end up cleaning toilets, and often the army way would be the hardest of the three. Germany has a proud history of complicating or over-engineering anything and everything from succession laws to federalism, so I think it's less of a jab and more of a begrudging compliment- the German way is still the right way, it's just going to have a few extra steps in-between...
The politics of debt management in wars of conquest are interesting as well because the debtors could turn to their creditors and tell them, "You know, if I go down, you lose all that I owe you; you don't think Badguy McInvaderton is going to pay you, do you?" and use that as leverage for more loans or even outright mercenary aid. Which makes it actually worth McInvaderton's while to promise to pay off those debts should he succeed. He may even be able to buy support from the creditors if it looks like the debtor he's invading is less willing or able to pay back those debts.
It'd be interesting how China's debts will get resolved, since from the Qing Dynasty to the establishment of the PRC, China took on at least a _trillion_ USD worth of bonds. However "China" nowadays is split into the PRC (Mainland China) and the ROC (Táiwān), both officially claiming sovereignty over the other and neither willing to pay off those outstanding loans.
They have no choice really.. Invade someone with a debt to other nations, they demand debt payment but they are weak, so you conquer them, but guess what? They have debts too! and guess who they have debts to? A superpower who you have no chance of winning against. So i'd opt to just pay the debt.
YOU ARE AMAZING MY FRIEND.. i cant believe this video has been out since 2020. and i'm only seeing it now.. and to that I say, people at the youtube need to work harder
If the new rulers actually like you and wish to have good relations with your banks, maybe they'll pay it. Maybe. But in most cases, they'll just show you out the door. And if you try to insist upon these debts, the guards will ask you to face the wall.
That's bad business for the ruler. Credit is important to future lender to be doing business with the rulers especially after expensive endeavor like fighting a war. Any rulers that has bad credit can easily deposed by one with a good credit that could borrow more money.
@kang C There was no such thing as a credit score back in the day only reputations. Honoring Debts was usually dependent on if you wanted to make service of that lender or if that lender held the coveted title of “Next” (to be annexed) Lenders didn’t particularly care if their competitors had their debts honored only that their loans returned a profit. Now if you make a reputation of not paying any debts public services and raising armies becomes a little difficult, Briton however side stepped this problem by being the primary lender with Annexation usually being the result of defaulted debts.
@@simonnachreiner8380 it was. It certainly was and has ever been. You mean computers didn't exist back then, OK. But credit and writen records did. BTW, have you ever heard about "reputation"? There.
Agreed. The British defeat the French largely due to having extremely low interest rates from never defaulting and having Parliament control the purse. The kings of France defaulted constantly and the more you default the worse the credit and the more likely the next default.
Ah the British way of doing things! Do what you want and don't suffer the consequences until the future generations make it all go to shit and then the more further future generations have to pay the price
@@richardarriaga6271 I would make some serious arguments about those nations having already haunted Britain, and the western world they helped build, quite a bit over the last century. The only exception would be China, but a significant part of their current foreign policy is a long form of revenge for the opium wars. We just haven't yet begun to feel the consequences there.
@@nuclearsynapse5319 I was being sarcastic. Germany reparations and seizure of industrial areas that could have paid for reparations or grow its economy helped radicalize Germans into bombing London.
Normally I just lurk, but I'll help keep pushing the algorithm to recommend more people this wonderful video - by the looks of it, you might finally be getting your spot in the, er... Spotlight. Good work on this video, by the way!
Great content, original, and interesting. I’d like to see a video on the origins of the banjo. Most people assume it’s from America but actually originated in Africa.
Wow, I stumbled across this video and at least three or four times throughout the video I was just blown away by the quality of your script, your background art, and the seemingly ease to explain topics that aren't always easy to understand. I really enjoyed how you used the Serbian-Ottoman empire curfuffle as a "hypothetical fantasy" to introduce us to the subject of the video, but also giving us a fun and creative resource to view the subject through now. Very impressive work, instantly subscribed.
I like the fact that the medieval Serbian ruler is presented the way he is. Our rulers really did try hard to improve the medieval state.... and then the Turks came.
@kitkat47 Chrysalis Uh the grammar of that sentence is confusing as hell. Did you mean “Why, are you Serbian” as in asking if he’s a Serb Or “Why are you Serbian” as in why is he a Serb. Which in that case I’d assume it’s because his family is?
@@kitkat47chrysalis95 unfortunately, when you don't know how to communicate in written language, the only person who knows what you really wanted to say is you
It’s really weird to me, as an American, to see the “disputed land” associated with Texas in regards to their independence from Mexico. In every American textbook I’ve read, that land is always considered to be part of Texas, with no mention of a dispute.
Americans finding out that their history books are not always telling the truth, manipulating it, changing facts or omiting things thus making them seem like the good guys on every ever affair of your country's history.
As an American, every textbook I have ever seen has always included that "Disputed Land" bit, specifically so that its understood what the cause for conflict was. Doesn't have to, as most Mexican texts likely include that Disputed Land as Mexican territory anyway, but it is what it is.
From what I read, the Mexicans owned the land and American farmers moved over to the place, some with their slaves in tow. As the Mexicans were trying to abolition slavery ( Though this may not be the primary reason ) the more prominent followers decided by the time that the Mexicans were going to enforce the law there, they would simply make their own country, that country being Texas, which would then want to be a state under the US. So? It's not a dispute between America and Mexico, it was disputed between the country of Texas and Mexico. The Texans won the coup and we have the results. God bless.
You should move forward a few years to WW2, where the Soviets never paid anything on the land/lease shipments, the Germans received grants from the Marshall Plan, while the British were still paying off land/lease debts until a few years ago. Sometimes it doesn't pay to win.
Germany had the pay the money lent by the Marshall Plan as well as pay reparations to jew people which I think they are still paying. Also, remember the Nuremberg trials. About Britain still paying. Well, it's war and is destructive by its own mean, it's violent and brute. No one really wins when there's destruction and violence involved. This is real life, not a video game where you can destroy everything and still loot boxes
"It doesn't pay to win, buhu poor UK 😢" My brother in Christ, do you know how many Soviets died because of the war? They paid with blood at a higher interest rate than the UK ever did.
0:25 Those are all the same people ...the Venicians who made loans were Jewish and same for Dutch because interest was a sin at that time in the Pope's Church
Now, this sort a format - reminiscent of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is just GRAND - thanks for a healthy dose of entertainment and education!
Onda valjda shvataš da ni Nemanja, ni Dečanski, ni Milutin a ni Dušan nisu morali ni od koga da uzimaju pare. Više verovatno da su zapadu davali pa zapad podrži Osmane da ne mora da vraća dugove.
This is great. As an Italian i was never taught that Piedmont took on all the former states' debt, but makes a lot of sense in getting the greenlight by the great powers. People in my city always complain about the Piedmontese sacking the treasure of the state, and this explains where it's gone.
And what happens in the opposite case, a country that separates from another, does the new country owe all the money that the original country invested in that territory or not? and what about third parties? how does it work?
Typically the debts are divided on a case by case basis. This actually came up during the UK /Scottish 2014 referendum. The amount that was being thrown around was 30% of the debt.
mr sidequest man I get you in my recommendations now and I never heard of you, I would recommend to post a lot like as much as you can, just a tip from me, your videos are awesome, keep it up!
There's a British comedian who has an entire act about the British empire invading every country on earth, and he makes the argument that even if the British empire didn't invade your country directly, your country was apart of a different country at the time That country was invaded by the British empire.
A detail I appreciated above all here was the short but scathing framing of Hawaii’s annexation. Literally never knew Hawaii was a literal *kingdom* we bought from Dole from my education
If you’re a conqueror and you don’t want to pay for these debts then a smartest thing to do is to leave a tiny bit of territory to original government so it would continue to exist and manage their debt.
“Extracting payments from someone with this many swords and canons was never a simple affair” brilliant line.
the real reason why many governments, including the American government, want to disarm their population. It's easier to tax the shit out of someone if you know they don't have the ability to resist you when you come to forcibly collect.
Also known as the "Bigger Army Diplomacy"
Actually it's pretty easy since the wages of sin is death, so all the money lenders have to do is to invade and get killed and they would have gained what they where owed as ordained by God almighty himself.
@@skitidet4302 what the fuck does the wage of sin have to do with real wages? It's literally impossible to be free of sin anyways so fuck it.
@@skitidet4302 lol, you believe that bullshit? 🐵
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
I absolutely adored everything about this video. Financial history is so underrated.
Yeah
Well hello Brandon, funny to see you here! Patrolling the Mojave sure does make you wish for a nuclear winter.
It is interesting.
I'd honestly like to have that in grand strategy RTS games, since could be neat
Alternatively, a video on how the colonies and how the UK handled debts during the revolutionary war could be neat, like did they have rival tax collector's attempting to get funds from the same places
Finally.
After years of watching this channel.
It has finally hit the algorithm
It’s unfortunate that useful financial data only go back a few centuries so not much of history can be analyzed through that scope.
It also sort of help that in the case of the British, Conqueror and creditor were often one in the same. In fact conquest being the result of not paying said debts, such as in the case of Egypt 😂
if u dont want to be fully subjugated and annexed then pay ur tv licence
War of the unpaid parking ticket
Imagine having your whole country repossessed for a missed payment.
@@mandalorian_guy some don't have to imagine 🤣
@@mandalorian_guy Newfoundland was it's own dominion for a while in the early 1900s. Went heavily into debt, bankrupted, and had to have the British directly rule them again.
There's an old saying in finance: "If you owe the bank a little money the bank owns you, if you owe the bank a lot of money then you own the bank." If a conqueror were to not pay back the debts of the nation it conquers then the nations that are owed money might be getting inclined to go to war with the potential conqueror. An example of this is world war I where the United States bought up enormous amounts of French and British bonds but then ultimately entered the war on behalf of the French and British because America needed them to survive so they would pay America back.
or, in a similar vein, the Habsburgs having so much debt with the Fugger family they were able to practically force them to give them more loans so they wouldnt just stop paying the old ones
I do wonder how the world would be if equity financing were used. 20% of my income for 10 years for $100,000, etc (much higher for a king who had more assets).
Actually they didn't pay America, cuz here in Brazil we received nothing. They paid only the US 😢
@@cookednick Most people will say The america when talking about the continent
@@cookednick doesn't really matter, becuase America does include both North and South technically, so it's no fault of Brazilians if they also include themselves in the Americans.
There's also the story of what happens when a country radically changes its government. I recently read a story about how the Soviet Union didn't honor debts from the Czar. It wasn't until the Soviet Union fell and the Russian Federation came into being (and wanted access to foreign debt markets) that they agreed to pay off these old, 100 year old bonds from the days of the Czar.
Whaaaat? Seriously? So those nations still didn't forget their debts from 100 years back ?wow!
@@theemirofjaffa2266 old debts simply mature into cross-generational grudges.
Newfoundland (1949) and Texas (1845) were forced to join Canada and the us, respectively, partially due to debt. I think the Newfies couldve pulled a proto-MMT argument and just "printed" their way out since it was during the Keynesian era, though most countries were on the Bretton woods.
@@리주민 MMT relies on fiat currency. The entire theory is that demand for the currency can stabilize it allowing for monetary and fiscal expansions. You just have to not expand so hard that inflation ensues. Breton Woods would make even a proto MMT impossible because you would have to devalue your currency relative to gold or risk monetary crisis over a long enough period of time.
China still owes the US more than a trillion dollars. Since the government became communist the government doesn't recognize the debt.
As a Finance dude, I love economic history. Great that you tackle these ore obscure subjects and awesome video!
it's so boring though, at least look up exploration and LGBT people in history
@@TotallyOriginality why should we look up pedophiles in positions of power?
@@TotallyOriginality lol.
@@TotallyOriginality wtf 😒
@@lyfe918 what?
The thing about Texas is the US never assumed its debt, the State of Texas was fully liable for that debt, and settled it in 1850 by selling eastern New Mexico and southern Colorado to the Federal Government which paid off a majority of the debt.
On the other hand, quite interestingly the US assumed ALL of Mexico's debt to Americans (roughly $3 million) in addition to the $15 million cash for the land that was annexed.
That is in fact really interesting. Thanks for this tidbit
I do not think the state of Texas was fully liable for the debt. I think it was an opportunity for them to grow and expand even more. If you check Mexico’s Texas map to the map of US’s Teaxas of today…..Texas is much SMALLER back then, than how big it is today.
These claims were just an opportunity to grow into a bigger state with more influence. Which makes sense because the people of Texas of back then always seek to take advantage of anything they could take.
When Texas was part of Mexico, Americans violated many laws such as taxes, trade and slavery. Slavery been the one that Texas kept having the most trouble with to the point its a major reason for it revolution. Many states of Mexico and the Mexican government kept telling Texas that they are braking the law.
Such as you cannot make children slaves. Or forced slaves to have babies and then have baby slaves. Mexico enforced laws into Texas that such babies are free and cannot become slaves and any child bellow the age of 14 must be freed. They enforce these laws since the they would not obey the initial law that….you cannot own slaves since slavery is ban in Mexico in the first place.
Also they were terrible ta paying taxes or more like unwilling, which is hilarious because the American independence began with, “No Tax without representation”. And yet they wanted representation after braking so many laws, no paying taxes and force people into slavery.
The conclusion is that Texans of back then just were opportunistic that took any advantage to increase their wealth regardless of how inmoral something was. Texans even participated for the confederacy in the civil war to keep their slaves.
In the treaty of Guadalupe was in huge favor of the US were they made them look like good victor and Texas decided to take advantage of the situation to increase it size and influence. But then again its not like the US is the first or last country to invade another country, then make itself look like a noble winner, there are plenty of European countries that did that several times.
I just wanted to impose since the state of Texas was not justified in any claim, nor the US. Like Hawaii, they just overthrew their government and then annexed to the US. Or Alaska, were they pay a foreign power which was about to retire because it was too expensive for them and they did not had control on the region completely in the first place.
I actually was surprised that during WWII that the US did not claimed half of Japan or any south east asian country that was invaded by Japan. But then again putting military bases is less costly than having to govern territories that are so far away. Just look England, France, Portugal and Spain. They are prime examples of trying to do that.
The most underrated youtube channel. Thanks for the quality content!
i agree
I totally agree
Finally something that can be called underrated
@@Adrian13235 it's pretty highly rated, just not very well known.
@@rotamrofsnart No it really isn't for a channel that's been going on this long doing some hard work compared to all the other crap you see on the internet getting millions of views, this is actually VERY underrated
As one historian said, English Kings had a long habit of borrowing large sums of money from both its own subjects and foreign creditors. What Cromwell introduced was the innovation of paying them back.
E
In money?
@@Rig0r_M0rtis
Blood
Basically, taking on the conquered debts grants legitimacy with the creditors (Typically very powerful people). Legitimacy with powerful people is what allows you to get away with conquest. Damn, got the urge to play EU4 now.
Having play EU4 multiple times, I still have no idea how one actually plays EU4.
@@atraxisdarkstarwait u are supposed to know how to play ?
Idk prefair CK2
We don’t pay any conquered territories’ debt in EU4.
@@vinsonsidhartain a way you could say coring does that. You use Administrative power. And the amount of possible loans you can take decreases if your economy stays exactly the same or gets worse as before the annexation.
But yes it isn't really represented in the game.
France - "Let me have those debts."
*reads debt list, which mysteriously references something about future events and something called "the German Empire"*
France - "Oh dear, what have I done?"
What's Vichy France?
Don't forget one of the causes of the French Revolution.
If you read the german finance leaders autobiography, he explained how Post WWI France essentially caused Hitlers rise through greed and stupidity
@@richardarriaga6271 German controlled free france
@@Jay-qb9gi Yo Kennedy
Discovered this channel recently and it really is a gold mine, rather unfortunate it doesn't have more subscribers
Yea
PagMan
I stumbled on this video and i didn't expect much but this is one of the best animated history vids ive seen. What was even more surprising was it having less then 100k views. I feel like i found some holy grail few are privileged to see!
No, those are called Books.
These videos always feel way longer than they are. And I mean that as a compliment! You pack so much into these videos that I feel like I’ve sat through a whole long video essay. Bravo on your fact-filled succinctness!
4:53 Me who just looked up Italy's debt few minutes ago: "That is not a good idea"
This video reminds me of a saying I heard while working in IT -"There is the right way, the wrong way, and the IBM way". I also came to learn that your can switch the word "IBM" with any huge organization/corporation such as GE, government, military, state of California, etc. that tend to have their own ideas and methods of getting things done.
the apple way, where every uograde is $200
That impression of Queen Victoria was the best part of the video! Lol. I love the way that you mix so much good information with great sense of humor and fun narration. Just such a great video and channel. Please keep the outstanding videos coming and God bless you, my friend!
your videos are so interesting and well put together, with original style and historical focus. I assume you're a team of people -- I hope you get the following you deserve in order to sustain this quality.
You made both history and economics entertaining.
Kudos.
Very interesting. The bit about the bond holders becoming millionaires got me thinking about all the generational wealthy people we have today. It would be interesting to see exactly where much of their wealth came from.
Yup! From their secret relationships with government, passed down to later generations. Those without connections were basically screwed.
People can predict what will happen in the future, invest on it then reap the reward when it become true?
@@namvo3013 They can, indeed, try. If they succeed they're wealthy(or wealthier).
The reason it's relatively simple to remain rich is you can keep investing in safe bets, along with risky ones without any real danger. If I put $10,000 into a random start up company and they went bankrupt, that'd have a pretty measurable impact on me. Not to mention not really doing all the much for them(depending on size and expenses).
If a billionaire invested 5 million dollars, it wouldn't have much impact on them if they lost it, but it is a significant boost in funds for a small company. And if they do relatively well the billionaire will make quite a bit back.
They can afford to do this many times. If even one company become a major success, they'll be up millions, or even billions as an early investor.
Meanwhile for my 10 grand, even if it becomes the next Amazon, I'd be lucky to retire on it.
Contrary to what the tech bros claim, most millionaires and billionaires inherited it.
@@SelfProclaimedEmperorAnd even those few who made their own fortunes in business did so with inherited seed capital. Elon Musk, for example, walked into a fortune from a South African mining empire.
Lesson: If you are in the 6th - 18th Century in debt, just let your country be invaded by a superpower country and not pay it.
Well yes, but as he said in this video debts then were standing on individuals not governments so dynasty had to pay it off instead of country.
Borrow money, build a decent place to live, wink suggestively at your next door neighbour and get invaded. You do a runner and the land is all the better for it.. Kind of
@@haxor98 plus you can always live in your neighbors fancy basement
There's... what like a 75% chance the invader would kill the local ruler though.
@@professorhaystacks6606 thats why you flee before the fall.
Queen Victoria: oh dear of course I’ll pay
Also queen Victoria: pretty bold demand for someone in canon blast distance
Brilliant narration and awesome content. I don't know why UA-cam only recommended your channel now. But boy, I'm glad it did. Congratulations
I thought you would explain Ottoman debts too. That was an interesting subject. Not only Turkey paid those debts, also the countries that born from Ottoman too paid those debts
Where are you from Alpi
What about the rebels who helped take it down?
@@kv4648 Countries that annexed any former Ottoman territory. Greece, etc. also paid Ottoman debts. Turkey paid the most, tho, obviously.
@@kmmmsyr9883 Yes Greece was in debt over 100% when it was first formed to pay Ottoman debt and the debt for the arms / help given by the allies that helped them win their independence
This video is my introduction to this channel and after watching one other video, I've subscribed. Thanks for the content, it's delicious.
This is good, especially when I'm a fan of this kind of stuff. This is underrated. The calmness and the well-toned voice.
The taking of debts rom conquered territory brought a sense of continuity and legitimacy. Bacially, what do you want? To pillage the territory or take it and make intitutions of goverment? Short term vs long term.
I'm sure the money lender chews were happy about pushing that idea
How does paying the Devil his due increase your legitimacy? I can only view someone as a real and moral leader if they tell the moneylenders to go back where they came from, which is Hell since debts are the tools of the Devil which he made to trap men and corrupt their hearts.
@@skitidet4302 So what you are saying is that invading another country and killing their people is fine. Lending money from those who have too much to build a better infrastructure for those who have too little is wrong. This kind of hypocrisy is why I hate Christians. What kind of twisted mind do you have if you think killing poor innocent people is fine and making their lives better is wrong?
@@skitidet4302 To the cesar what is of the cesar, to the devil what is of the devil.
@@skitidet4302 so a real leader to you is someone who steals the money and gets rid of those who's money he took
Dang, British weren't screwing around.
"You inherited their debt."
"Cool, I'll pay it with your head."
Honestly that's how I was expecting 90% of this to go. People just warring over debts.
If you (as a king) don't pay those debts, do you think private individuals/societies will finance your future businesses with new debts?
Me as a moneylender surely not because you can't take some rules of this system but not the nasty ones.
@@anto8375 The "moneylenders" should not have financed projects outside their sovereigns borders, but we all know how subversive money lenders can be.
@@stevencooper4422 oy VEYYYYY
Wait are you saying wars are fought over money and power, not ideals and democracy!?
@@kane357lynch Really makes you think
A few channels are doing what you do on UA-cam, but you guys are by far my favourite among them. Keep it up!
Thanks!
Did not expect to hear my countries name on the second ever video i played on this channel😲 but im really happy i did, greetings from Serbia 🇷🇸❤️ this channel is amazing
I'm not Serbian but Iike Serbia so hello haha
@@WizzardJC well most unique thing about us is the language as we follow the rule "write as you hear,and read as it is written,one letter,one voice" for example saying "where am i" would be written as "ver em aj" if english language followed the same rule.tbh most people i explain the fact that each word can be changed in 7 different ways depending on the conversational circumstances,people really get confused about the variations,but it is technically a 3rd grader stuff here that everyone learns easly lol.
junky cheetah here's your name written through these variations:
junky cheetah,junky cheetaha,junky cheetahi,junky cheetah,junky cheetah,junky cheetahom,junky cheetahu
it would probably be a little different if i converted text of j to џ and y to i,but instead i just changed the ends of the sentence as thats really the only thing that changed through variations.
@@theicyphoenix_7745 but the rule spell as you hear isnt unique...
@@theicyphoenix_7745 that isnt unique with serbia
@@sillygoose4460 polish czech albanian korean arabic just to name a few
Cannot believe a history buff like me has been missing out on this channel.
"Theres the right way, then there's the German way, you know..."
Well done good sir 🎩
Is that a well known phrase, Or just a jab? I'm really curious.
Same. Such a good channel. I just found them recently. Good thing they seem to be blowing up now.
or as it was known the holy Roman way
Gee I wonder what group of people enacted that "pay the debts of another country's money loans" in germany.
@@shaggyd00kale58 It seems like a derivative of a classic US military adage, "right way, wrong way, army way." The idea was that regardless of if it was right or wrong, you'd end up doing it the army way, because otherwise you'd end up cleaning toilets, and often the army way would be the hardest of the three.
Germany has a proud history of complicating or over-engineering anything and everything from succession laws to federalism, so I think it's less of a jab and more of a begrudging compliment- the German way is still the right way, it's just going to have a few extra steps in-between...
Such interesting topics well packed into easily digestable short videos. Love it, i hope your channel takes off, you truly deserve it!
This has been a recurring issue for me for some time now. Tysm you’re a life saver 🙏
The politics of debt management in wars of conquest are interesting as well because the debtors could turn to their creditors and tell them, "You know, if I go down, you lose all that I owe you; you don't think Badguy McInvaderton is going to pay you, do you?" and use that as leverage for more loans or even outright mercenary aid. Which makes it actually worth McInvaderton's while to promise to pay off those debts should he succeed. He may even be able to buy support from the creditors if it looks like the debtor he's invading is less willing or able to pay back those debts.
These quests give great xp!
It'd be interesting how China's debts will get resolved, since from the Qing Dynasty to the establishment of the PRC, China took on at least a _trillion_ USD worth of bonds. However "China" nowadays is split into the PRC (Mainland China) and the ROC (Táiwān), both officially claiming sovereignty over the other and neither willing to pay off those outstanding loans.
5:55 perfectly balanced. Just as Spiffing Brit said
2:25 right way Vs German way
3:50 American jingoism
4:42 Italian bond
5:04 wallstreet bets
5:25 Japan in Korea
5:48 British inconsistencies
1:37 *Credit card declines*: Private army invades just to destroy the buildings
Loved the r/wsb shoutout lol
I found this channel today, this is one of the true underrated channels
I am genuinely surprised debts of conquered countries are paid off. That seems....odd and unenforceable to me.
They have no choice really.. Invade someone with a debt to other nations, they demand debt payment but they are weak, so you conquer them, but guess what? They have debts too! and guess who they have debts to? A superpower who you have no chance of winning against. So i'd opt to just pay the debt.
Well IT dependent ob the conquerer. They did only pay IT Back If they wanted. IT was basicaly morally rightfull bribery.
They want to be able to borrow more money
It was probably to get on the good side of the lender if they ever needed loans in the future
The bourgeoisie have too much power, not bribing them can be a costly affair.
I can't believe I just now found this channel this video was awesome.
YOU ARE AMAZING MY FRIEND.. i cant believe this video has been out since 2020. and i'm only seeing it now.. and to that I say, people at the youtube need to work harder
If the new rulers actually like you and wish to have good relations with your banks, maybe they'll pay it. Maybe. But in most cases, they'll just show you out the door. And if you try to insist upon these debts, the guards will ask you to face the wall.
That's bad business for the ruler. Credit is important to future lender to be doing business with the rulers especially after expensive endeavor like fighting a war. Any rulers that has bad credit can easily deposed by one with a good credit that could borrow more money.
@kang C
There was no such thing as a credit score back in the day only reputations. Honoring Debts was usually dependent on if you wanted to make service of that lender or if that lender held the coveted title of “Next” (to be annexed) Lenders didn’t particularly care if their competitors had their debts honored only that their loans returned a profit. Now if you make a reputation of not paying any debts public services and raising armies becomes a little difficult, Briton however side stepped this problem by being the primary lender with Annexation usually being the result of defaulted debts.
@@simonnachreiner8380 it was. It certainly was and has ever been.
You mean computers didn't exist back then, OK. But credit and writen records did.
BTW, have you ever heard about "reputation"? There.
Agreed. The British defeat the French largely due to having extremely low interest rates from never defaulting and having Parliament control the purse. The kings of France defaulted constantly and the more you default the worse the credit and the more likely the next default.
I absolutely love this art style and these videos.
Ah the British way of doing things! Do what you want and don't suffer the consequences until the future generations make it all go to shit and then the more further future generations have to pay the price
Persia, Palestine, China, Afghanistan, and Germany never came back to haunt the British for their short-term gain. 😉
yet
@@richardarriaga6271 I would make some serious arguments about those nations having already haunted Britain, and the western world they helped build, quite a bit over the last century. The only exception would be China, but a significant part of their current foreign policy is a long form of revenge for the opium wars. We just haven't yet begun to feel the consequences there.
@@nuclearsynapse5319 I was being sarcastic. Germany reparations and seizure of industrial areas that could have paid for reparations or grow its economy helped radicalize Germans into bombing London.
That's the thing about realpolitik, if you are conquered then you, by definition, deserve to be conquered.
I am from Serbia and I didn't expect you to mention us in your video, what a nice surprise :)
4:59 the name's bond . italian bond
I just found this channel and I'm already in love with the style of it's content
Nice pfp
Here before this channel blows up
2:37 oh god that must have taken long
2:26 Theres the right way. than there's the Riche way...
IYKYK
This was incredibly informative, and funny! Very nice work.
Great drawings, topic choice and channel! Thank you for your hard work
This man as under-rated as Dani Alves for Barcelona.
Normally I just lurk, but I'll help keep pushing the algorithm to recommend more people this wonderful video - by the looks of it, you might finally be getting your spot in the, er... Spotlight.
Good work on this video, by the way!
The best UA-cam videos are topics you’ve never thought about before, but as soon as you see the title, you are immediately interested.
Nocturne in E-flat major, Op. 9, No. 2 by Frédéric Chopin in case anyone was wondering what the song was. composed when he was 20.
It is edited I assume. Is it channel's own edit though I don't know. Would appreciate if someone tell.
Great content, original, and interesting. I’d like to see a video on the origins of the banjo. Most people assume it’s from America but actually originated in Africa.
Wow, I stumbled across this video and at least three or four times throughout the video I was just blown away by the quality of your script, your background art, and the seemingly ease to explain topics that aren't always easy to understand. I really enjoyed how you used the Serbian-Ottoman empire curfuffle as a "hypothetical fantasy" to introduce us to the subject of the video, but also giving us a fun and creative resource to view the subject through now. Very impressive work, instantly subscribed.
His art of the Serb Orthodox monastery was good too.
I like the fact that the medieval Serbian ruler is presented the way he is. Our rulers really did try hard to improve the medieval state.... and then the Turks came.
why are you serbian?
@kitkat47 Chrysalis
Uh the grammar of that sentence is confusing as hell.
Did you mean “Why, are you Serbian” as in asking if he’s a Serb
Or
“Why are you Serbian” as in why is he a Serb. Which in that case I’d assume it’s because his family is?
@@simonnachreiner8380 he knows what i mean
@@kitkat47chrysalis95 unfortunately, when you don't know how to communicate in written language, the only person who knows what you really wanted to say is you
@@impact0r he meant why, (pause) are you serbian
And not "Why are you Serbian?"
So he was asking is he is a Serb and not why he is a Serb
That was the most beautiful piece of art I’ve ever seen. Thank you.
The best educational channel the algorithm the linked me up with so far. Amazing job!!
“Someone save the records of our debts!”
5:47 why does this not surprise me?
0:49 "All the best with that, by the way." What is that supose to mean?
Sarcastic wish for the conquered nation to have a good time being occupied by the Ottomans
This channel is just way too underrated. This deserves more.
This just popped into my feed for no clear reason… instant subscribe
Amazing. Absolutely Amazing.
2:15 From the JEWISH Germans if you wanna be historically correct.
2:42 is the best part
UA-cam threw this video at me this morning (never seen the channel before) and all I can say is thank you algorithm, that was a great find.
I just found this channel and it's now one of my favorites
It’s really weird to me, as an American, to see the “disputed land” associated with Texas in regards to their independence from Mexico. In every American textbook I’ve read, that land is always considered to be part of Texas, with no mention of a dispute.
Americans finding out that their history books are not always telling the truth, manipulating it, changing facts or omiting things thus making them seem like the good guys on every ever affair of your country's history.
As an American, every textbook I have ever seen has always included that "Disputed Land" bit, specifically so that its understood what the cause for conflict was. Doesn't have to, as most Mexican texts likely include that Disputed Land as Mexican territory anyway, but it is what it is.
@@stephenjenkins7971 same, it's always listed as disputed
As an American I have seen the disputed claim.
From what I read, the Mexicans owned the land and American farmers moved over to the place, some with their slaves in tow. As the Mexicans were trying to abolition slavery ( Though this may not be the primary reason ) the more prominent followers decided by the time that the Mexicans were going to enforce the law there, they would simply make their own country, that country being Texas, which would then want to be a state under the US.
So? It's not a dispute between America and Mexico, it was disputed between the country of Texas and Mexico. The Texans won the coup and we have the results. God bless.
20% interest? With relatively no economic development? That's a loan shark
Not to mention the creditor should be punished for backing the losing horse.
1:49 why does the Serbian ruler say Moi? Is it just French or does that mean something in Serbian?
Im means "mine"
It is not Serbian,it is french,and it means nothing on Serbian
As a Bulgarian the image of the St Alexander Nevsky cathedral with a minaret at 0:48 almost gave me a heart attack
Thats not alexander nevsky cathedral
This is my first video of this channel and I'm so excited to have found it.
3:50 hmmm.... Perhaps.
You should move forward a few years to WW2, where the Soviets never paid anything on the land/lease shipments, the Germans received grants from the Marshall Plan, while the British were still paying off land/lease debts until a few years ago.
Sometimes it doesn't pay to win.
Germany had the pay the money lent by the Marshall Plan as well as pay reparations to jew people which I think they are still paying. Also, remember the Nuremberg trials.
About Britain still paying. Well, it's war and is destructive by its own mean, it's violent and brute. No one really wins when there's destruction and violence involved. This is real life, not a video game where you can destroy everything and still loot boxes
"It doesn't pay to win, buhu poor UK 😢"
My brother in Christ, do you know how many Soviets died because of the war? They paid with blood at a higher interest rate than the UK ever did.
0:25 Those are all the same people
...the Venicians who made loans were Jewish and same for Dutch because interest was a sin at that time in the Pope's Church
And also because Jewish people were commonly only allowed to hold careers in moneylending by antisemetic Christian states.
I am so glad I discovered this channel.
Now, this sort a format - reminiscent of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is just GRAND - thanks for a healthy dose of entertainment and education!
Imagine you are the ruler of medieval Serbia...
You have no idea how often I do! :)
Onda valjda shvataš da ni Nemanja, ni Dečanski, ni Milutin a ni Dušan nisu morali ni od koga da uzimaju pare. Više verovatno da su zapadu davali pa zapad podrži Osmane da ne mora da vraća dugove.
This is great. As an Italian i was never taught that Piedmont took on all the former states' debt, but makes a lot of sense in getting the greenlight by the great powers. People in my city always complain about the Piedmontese sacking the treasure of the state, and this explains where it's gone.
The only reason they assumed debts was because they knew they wanted to borrow from the bankers who loaned the money.
Great visuals and voice. I never leave a comment, but this video is so great
Great video and something I didn't consider before watching it. Keep up the good work!
0:20 Why medieval serbian peasant has a bag of british pound coins? Was he bribed by english crown to do smthng sinister in Serbia?
And what happens in the opposite case, a country that separates from another, does the new country owe all the money that the original country invested in that territory or not? and what about third parties? how does it work?
Typically the debts are divided on a case by case basis. This actually came up during the UK /Scottish 2014 referendum. The amount that was being thrown around was 30% of the debt.
Didn't Russia take all Soviet debts? On condition they keep all the nukes?
you make me wanna keep hopping on civ 6 lol
mr sidequest man I get you in my recommendations now and I never heard of you, I would recommend to post a lot like as much as you can, just a tip from me, your videos are awesome, keep it up!
What a ride of a video! Thank you
There's a British comedian who has an entire act about the British empire invading every country on earth, and he makes the argument that even if the British empire didn't invade your country directly, your country was apart of a different country at the time That country was invaded by the British empire.
its funny but also when the empire invades ur house may be swept into ruin by the sweepy boys
Al Murray?
Largely true.
False. Many debunking videos
@@SethTheOrigin Debunking what. New England was taken from the Dutch, Canada from the French, India from the Mughals
A detail I appreciated above all here was the short but scathing framing of Hawaii’s annexation. Literally never knew Hawaii was a literal *kingdom* we bought from Dole from my education
If you’re a conqueror and you don’t want to pay for these debts then a smartest thing to do is to leave a tiny bit of territory to original government so it would continue to exist and manage their debt.
This was fantastic quality!!!
First time viewer, your editing style & humour will take you far.