Great video! I really enjoyed it, but I have one suggestion that might make it even better for your audience. Using a pointer while explaining would really help us follow along more easily and understand your points better. Sometimes it’s hard to keep up without a visual guide. Keep up the great work!
Very good video! Another thing about both secondary and tertiary datum features referenced at MMB is that you can not be sure the datum precedence order will actually be kept in practice. Ideally, according to their order in the feature control frame, datum feature A would orient and constrain 3 DOF including 2 rotations, then datum feature B would locate and constrain 2 translations, then datum feature C should only do clocking by constraining the final rotational DOF. However, since the datum feature simulator pins B and C are of constant size, datum feature C could potentially be produced in a condition that would either cause it contact the datum feature C simulator pin or just have less clearance than B hole and simulator have. Then C would actually act as secondary or both B and C could act as a pattern datum feature and not according to their specified order... 🤔 Perhaps the second case in your video, where the MMB for datum feature C is smaller then the one for B, could reduce that uncertainty 🤔
Great video! I really enjoyed it, but I have one suggestion that might make it even better for your audience. Using a pointer while explaining would really help us follow along more easily and understand your points better. Sometimes it’s hard to keep up without a visual guide. Keep up the great work!
Very good video!
Another thing about both secondary and tertiary datum features referenced at MMB is that you can not be sure the datum precedence order will actually be kept in practice. Ideally, according to their order in the feature control frame, datum feature A would orient and constrain 3 DOF including 2 rotations, then datum feature B would locate and constrain 2 translations, then datum feature C should only do clocking by constraining the final rotational DOF. However, since the datum feature simulator pins B and C are of constant size, datum feature C could potentially be produced in a condition that would either cause it contact the datum feature C simulator pin or just have less clearance than B hole and simulator have. Then C would actually act as secondary or both B and C could act as a pattern datum feature and not according to their specified order... 🤔
Perhaps the second case in your video, where the MMB for datum feature C is smaller then the one for B, could reduce that uncertainty 🤔