Cool channel i got that mic too it does good for streaming games on fb and doesn't catch as much background noise like the yeti i had before i agree overpriced but its the last mic i am gonna buy for many years so i will make it worth it
"We all know it isn't worth it." I don't think I've seen anyone else say that about this mic. And the revelator lets in so much room noise, it's really not a competitor with the MV7.
Yeah I was under the impression is was going to be this great mic. Which is why I wanted to make sure my review showed off a real working condition. My studio is not perfect but the Revelator requires great sound proofing to be good.
Thanks for the good video, and for being the voice of doubt about this somewhat overrated microphone. The RK345 windscreen is better (if only because it's longer, and forces you farther away from the diaphragm), and I don't disagree with your comments about plosives with this mic. What I would add, though, is that the $400 SM7B also has issues with plosives, even though you don't hear a lot of people acknowledging it. It's fine if you angle the mic properly to avoid puffing that air directly into it -- but if you face right into theSM7B, the issue is the same as you demonstrated. The Revelator does look interesting!
I find it very strange for a 250$ microphone we got a terrible windscreen. I agree with the SM7B as well, I think since it's become a podcast "standard" no one questions why it is used. I mean heck the reason I bought the MV7 alone is because of SHURE's brand. I am glad I bought it and to experience it. I know there are mics out there for cheaper $$ and one of these days I will explore getting some for myself to play around with!
Cool channel i got that mic too it does good for streaming games on fb and doesn't catch as much background noise like the yeti i had before i agree overpriced but its the last mic i am gonna buy for many years so i will make it worth it
Yes I still like it more than my friends Yeti and it works well. If i had better sound treated room it would be less of an issue as well!
"We all know it isn't worth it." I don't think I've seen anyone else say that about this mic. And the revelator lets in so much room noise, it's really not a competitor with the MV7.
Yeah I was under the impression is was going to be this great mic. Which is why I wanted to make sure my review showed off a real working condition. My studio is not perfect but the Revelator requires great sound proofing to be good.
Thanks for the good video, and for being the voice of doubt about this somewhat overrated microphone. The RK345 windscreen is better (if only because it's longer, and forces you farther away from the diaphragm), and I don't disagree with your comments about plosives with this mic. What I would add, though, is that the $400 SM7B also has issues with plosives, even though you don't hear a lot of people acknowledging it. It's fine if you angle the mic properly to avoid puffing that air directly into it -- but if you face right into theSM7B, the issue is the same as you demonstrated. The Revelator does look interesting!
I find it very strange for a 250$ microphone we got a terrible windscreen. I agree with the SM7B as well, I think since it's become a podcast "standard" no one questions why it is used. I mean heck the reason I bought the MV7 alone is because of SHURE's brand. I am glad I bought it and to experience it. I know there are mics out there for cheaper $$ and one of these days I will explore getting some for myself to play around with!
How well does the RK345 fit? Is it loose or does it fall off?
It is a snug fit and will not fall off. Once it is on it is on. So far I really enjoy using it it is leagues better than the included screen.
nice video!
Thank you!