Thanks for the cast! You hit the nail on the head with the Shahak: we used it as a cheap and fast scout in case the enemy starts with a high amount of helicopters. An unexpected helodrop can be quite impactful - as Putin demonstrated.
As weird as it sounds sometimes watching Razzman & co is truly mesmerizing. Makes Wargame look like a total art with their moves. Similar to watching a brilliant chess player, pretty cool. Also very well done to "The Triad." they fought them as well as anyone could fight LTG/LTG/MAJG.
Impressive display of skill. Blueford was superb, impressive display of knowledge, tactics, and strategy. Redford was great too, put up a good fight, and made this much more interesting.
While there was a certain amount of RNG involved, severe micro errors were of much bigger significance - 2 missiles were shot on the move (and Fleyta has really bad accuracy, and only 20% stabilizer). More importantly - Mi 25 should focus the Tiran(which has worse armor than Achzarit), so Erikoisrajajääkäri could move in either simultaneously or a bit later, when there was no recon - they have a better chance of taking out this CV
Both teams had interesting ideas. BLUFOR scout plane is something I might start doing more often to get intel on possible helo rushes. REDFOR flank is something I personally try to do in half the games, and it usually works quite well. If that recon team had been able to cross the road earlier and spot the CV... I can only imagine the outcome. Same about the helo, it just missed the ATGM :/ Good game, I'm really hyped to see the 2nd round
Stealth, u ever considered to change youre icon settings? About taking out merging, so the icons stay exactly above the units different positions, so u can see even far outzoomed, in wich exact positions they are. With your current settings, is it outzoomed not visible where exactly the units are, because theyre labels are merged and in a row....
They have good units, sure, but they are not without weakness. Each teams plays each other twice. That means they each have the opportunity to play Israel. I'm not changing the rules mid-tournament.
@@Stealth17Gaming Understandable, but just a recon (SF, true) team with spike missile is borderline OP. Not even US and USSR have something like this. And then are the grenade launcher MBTs...
In a standard game Israel (top tier spam) is way better then US or URSS (which have a few really OP units to compensate mediocre infantry), but with no income US and URSS can use really with a lot of liberties their OP units (F-117/longbow/A10/Su25T/...) because with no income: 1:If you buy enough AA to counter this type of units (around 200pts, the price of 2 or 3 good AA units to cover a large part of the front, with only one the enemy will just strike on the other side) you will be in a deep sh.. if your enemy doesn't use air, effectively lacking 200pts.... 2: If you don't buy a good AA net (if you "only" take a few medium AA for example), you can play the game, and when you have invested all your points in other things your enemy will strike with a now near-invincible powerful unit (you will maybe hit them, but you won't kill them, and they will probably finish your AA on the next run). Israel doesn't have the same type of units which can even counter their counters.
![Wargame Red Dragon - The Final [Freepoint vs ItsRazzPutin - Tournament]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Aegzru48Kvc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Wargame Red Dragon - USA's Finest [Live US Armored]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/G_z0y_k0AyE/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for the cast! You hit the nail on the head with the Shahak: we used it as a cheap and fast scout in case the enemy starts with a high amount of helicopters. An unexpected helodrop can be quite impactful - as Putin demonstrated.
As weird as it sounds sometimes watching Razzman & co is truly mesmerizing. Makes Wargame look like a total art with their moves. Similar to watching a brilliant chess player, pretty cool.
Also very well done to "The Triad." they fought them as well as anyone could fight LTG/LTG/MAJG.
The moment I saw Razzman and co. I knew who would win, but the other team did hold their own pretty well.
How wonderful is ur channel l, I watch ur vids everyday, just today I watched ur 2 recon tutorial vids
I have >not< been waiting the whole evening on youtube for this.
Impressive display of skill. Blueford was superb, impressive display of knowledge, tactics, and strategy.
Redford was great too, put up a good fight, and made this much more interesting.
Impressive. Both teams. A perfect chess match on the bluefor side, and a resist-and-bite style defense on redfor site. F for both of 'em.
That was such unfair rng with the mi-25. All of the missiles missing that cv
that infiltration behind enemy lines almost made it to be a turning point but indeed missing every single missile made no sense....
He was moving while firing a missile with terrible accuracy when hovering. They should have been off and micro'd
Ultimately it would not have mattered, we had the conquest points lead, destruction points lead and would still have had a +1.
While there was a certain amount of RNG involved, severe micro errors were of much bigger significance - 2 missiles were shot on the move (and Fleyta has really bad accuracy, and only 20% stabilizer). More importantly - Mi 25 should focus the Tiran(which has worse armor than Achzarit), so Erikoisrajajääkäri could move in either simultaneously or a bit later, when there was no recon - they have a better chance of taking out this CV
But on the other hand, the Mi-25 got very lucky regarding the AA missiles and gun runs coming its way!
Kind of a small detail but shout out to that BGS team killing that T-55 at the end of the match! Love BGS/Grenzers!
JPSavage84 I think it was actually the 2A5 that got the kill
Both teams had interesting ideas. BLUFOR scout plane is something I might start doing more often to get intel on possible helo rushes.
REDFOR flank is something I personally try to do in half the games, and it usually works quite well. If that recon team had been able to cross the road earlier and spot the CV... I can only imagine the outcome. Same about the helo, it just missed the ATGM :/
Good game, I'm really hyped to see the 2nd round
The amount of team play and coordination is out of another world
The Reservistes use the MAS 49/56, which while not a bolt-action rifle, was the main service rifle that replaced their WW2-era bolt-action rifles.
that special forces infiltration by redfor, if it had moved just after the Tiger Hap left... if only Red had known, the opportunity was there :P
Another sweet game! this points cap making for some serious tactics
9:00 wow if the Panzergrenediers moved just a few meters and killed the MANPADs before the Tiger came that would have been such a huge diffrence
Meanwhile I can’t even beat the campaign
Really nice tournament. Low income forces ingenuity and risky plays.
it is not low income, it is NO-Income !
Stealth, u ever considered to change youre icon settings? About taking out merging, so the icons stay exactly above the units different positions, so u can see even far outzoomed, in wich exact positions they are. With your current settings, is it outzoomed not visible where exactly the units are, because theyre labels are merged and in a row....
Funny to see Razzmann here
Wait just a sec! Two LtGen and MajGen on the same team and one of them has an israeli deck. I have concerns about the fairness of this match-up.
They signed up as a team. Israel is allowed. It's all good.
@@Stealth17Gaming Also they have to take turn playing Redfor.
@@Stealth17Gaming Yeah, I have no problem with the premises, just saying that Red team were up against it pretty hard.
@@Soonzuh What's the solution though? Just ban players who're good at the game and have a high ranked?
@@herecomesthatboy1961 I wasn't looking for a solution. It was just a reaction, like when you see Germany play Luxemburg in football.
Was it fair? look at the ranks of bluefor lol
It's a tournament match. I'm not separating teams on whether they are fair or not.
@@Stealth17Gaming my bad :)
The more matches I watch with Israel, the more I think it should be considered equal to US and USSR (and thus not allowed in tournament)
They have good units, sure, but they are not without weakness. Each teams plays each other twice. That means they each have the opportunity to play Israel. I'm not changing the rules mid-tournament.
@@Stealth17Gaming Understandable, but just a recon (SF, true) team with spike missile is borderline OP. Not even US and USSR have something like this.
And then are the grenade launcher MBTs...
@@BarcelPL ROK has the latter too
In a standard game Israel (top tier spam) is way better then US or URSS (which have a few really OP units to compensate mediocre infantry), but with no income US and URSS can use really with a lot of liberties their OP units (F-117/longbow/A10/Su25T/...) because with no income:
1:If you buy enough AA to counter this type of units (around 200pts, the price of 2 or 3 good AA units to cover a large part of the front, with only one the enemy will just strike on the other side) you will be in a deep sh.. if your enemy doesn't use air, effectively lacking 200pts....
2: If you don't buy a good AA net (if you "only" take a few medium AA for example), you can play the game, and when you have invested all your points in other things your enemy will strike with a now near-invincible powerful unit (you will maybe hit them, but you won't kill them, and they will probably finish your AA on the next run).
Israel doesn't have the same type of units which can even counter their counters.
:P