FE Exam Statics - Zero Force Members On A Truss

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @drewnezelek6962
    @drewnezelek6962 5 років тому +9

    Got my results today and I passed thank god! I owe you a lot of credit to you because your channel really helped me buckle down and make the learning a hell of a lot easier and manageable! I wish the best for you and have no doubt you will succeed in whatever you decide to do! Now i'm going to go check on my mason jar sprouts and crack one to celebrate!!!!

    • @Genieprep
      @Genieprep  5 років тому +2

      Great job, I am really happy to hear that you passed! Congrats 😊 and thank you, I am glad my videos were helpful. Good luck on your future endeavors, and enjoy your broccoli sprouts 😂

  • @ahulse78
    @ahulse78 4 роки тому +6

    Nice quick video explaining it. Minor note: Although obvious, you didn't state to ignore the right side of the diagram because they all had forces on them.

  • @amer9106
    @amer9106 5 років тому +5

    I only had 5 days to study for my exam and I managed to pass, your videos helped me brush up on old topics I had forgotten. Keep it up, hopefully you can grow your channel and make something bigger out of it!

    • @Genieprep
      @Genieprep  5 років тому +1

      Congrats and that is awesome 😊

  • @zedia97
    @zedia97 5 років тому +5

    I'm happy to announce I passed the FE, thank you for the videos they were very helpful and informative :)

    • @Genieprep
      @Genieprep  5 років тому

      Hello, congrats on your exam, I am really happy for you and I am glad to hear that my videos were helpful!

  • @jasondiaz7429
    @jasondiaz7429 3 роки тому

    This youtube channel is amazing. Thank you so much for making these videos!

  • @jimmyjolly8532
    @jimmyjolly8532 4 роки тому +4

    What about P, L and M joints?

  • @Cc-jk9ov
    @Cc-jk9ov 4 роки тому +1

    Hello! Thank you for all your videos. Just wanted to confirm if member PG is considered a zero force member based on:
    the 3 members, 2 which are collinear and connected to a joint that has not external load rule. Thanks!

  • @teoman5503
    @teoman5503 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much, very well explained!!

    • @Genieprep
      @Genieprep  2 роки тому

      Thank you for watching! I'm glad you found it helpful

  • @brianwin5183
    @brianwin5183 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @02AJO
    @02AJO 4 місяці тому

    Your videos are really simple and helpful. But this is a little bit confusing. You calculated joint N twice first time to say CN is 0, at that time KN&NE were collinear then while considering Joint K you made KN 0. Now you should have done joint E which had a force to make your point more clear.

  • @ANIK8TV
    @ANIK8TV 5 років тому

    please make a video on ILD for hinged beam

  • @belsaoud6325
    @belsaoud6325 5 років тому +3

    Merci

  • @IbrahimBarnous
    @IbrahimBarnous 4 роки тому

    What about others members FP&PG&GH&GM&GL&HM&HI
    And thanks for your help

    • @008gilbert
      @008gilbert 3 роки тому

      They can't be Zero Force members since there are loads acting upon them.

  • @felipegarcia2269
    @felipegarcia2269 5 років тому

    Isn't KN and NE colinear?

    • @Genieprep
      @Genieprep  5 років тому

      At joint N, we have no external forces and 3 members, KN and NE are collinear, CN is not collinear and that is why CN is zero. I hope this makes sense and good luck with your studying!

    • @Drumlne12
      @Drumlne12 3 роки тому

      @Armen Ware it is because of the sum of the forces at N. If you had a force acting through NE then one of the other members around N would have to help out.

  • @tompusang6239
    @tompusang6239 5 років тому

    Subscribed

    • @Genieprep
      @Genieprep  5 років тому +1

      Thank you Tom for your support!

    • @tompusang6239
      @tompusang6239 5 років тому

      @@Genieprep keep uploading

  • @sd-zj2dq
    @sd-zj2dq 3 роки тому

    nice voice

  • @wesalnawabi7541
    @wesalnawabi7541 4 роки тому +1

    lack of illustration