They say a limit converges but I don't get it,, maybe I am dumb or maybe mental constructs are not a substitute for truth,, in reality we all know motion is possible,,
Solution to paradox often entails simple recognition of empiricle reality. Zeno's regression paradox is refuted by supplanting the "finite" assertions of fractions, in arithmatic, with the rational function of calculus. Similarly, Russel's "paradox of specification" is actually an affirmation of set theory's first axiom, defining the empty set, and not a denial of set theory's second axiom of speicification. Thus, the domain of the empty set is defined first by a+(-a)=0 and is further specified by expanding values with Cantor's "different orders of infinitude" as derivatives of the empty set. Additionally, the second axiom of set theory defines recognition of empiricle reality using an inseparable fusion of two variables, one from the natural order and the other from the existential order. Thus, the view of the philosopher is divided in two directions between sensible phenomenon and noumenal logic essence of the subconscious. Finally, that singular essence that binds the sum of all humanity, that noumenal logic essence of all languages, defines what's called the domain of universal grammar.
You need to convince whoever you have doing your editing for you to stop using AI-generated images. They keep turning out creepy. In this case, the third individual from the right in the first 'group of people queued for the Barbie movie' has a bulging insect-like right eye, a long center tooth in her mouth, and shares a torso with the person to her right. In the third group of such 'people,' the four individuals nearest the left have at least one long vertical pupil, and at least one finger with extra joints. Not to mention the separate issue that all four such images depict the only patrons of the film being individuals that resemble barbie dolls . . .
They go wrong because you can’t reason your way to truth. Pure reason doesn’t work. Sometimes it works, but you can’t be sure. Plato’s precious dialectic is faulty. It’s why we have the scientific method. And always questioning truth claims. No one has perfect knowledge. Yet the Plato types keep telling us they got all the answers. Zeno wasn’t about to stand in front of the arrow was he. Only the academy could take centuries to figure out why Zeno was wrong, the rest of us already knew. And we knew from experience, math, intuition and reason, not just step by faulty dialectical step till you believe in nonsensical conclusions. Yes I know Zeno and Parmenides were before Plato, they led directly to him. Cheers.
That when you have to reinvent the rules of physics and mathematics to win an argument(':
Show me a philosophy that accounts for the beauty of a sunset or the pain of separation
They say a limit converges but I don't get it,, maybe I am dumb or maybe mental constructs are not a substitute for truth,, in reality we all know motion is possible,,
Solution to paradox often entails simple recognition of empiricle reality. Zeno's regression paradox is refuted by supplanting the "finite" assertions of fractions, in arithmatic, with the rational function of calculus. Similarly, Russel's "paradox of specification" is actually an affirmation of set theory's first axiom, defining the empty set, and not a denial of set theory's second axiom of speicification. Thus, the domain of the empty set is defined first by a+(-a)=0 and is further specified by expanding values with Cantor's "different orders of infinitude" as derivatives of the empty set. Additionally, the second axiom of set theory defines recognition of empiricle reality using an inseparable fusion of two variables, one from the natural order and the other from the existential order. Thus, the view of the philosopher is divided in two directions between sensible phenomenon and noumenal logic essence of the subconscious. Finally, that singular essence that binds the sum of all humanity, that noumenal logic essence of all languages, defines what's called the domain of universal grammar.
You need to convince whoever you have doing your editing for you to stop using AI-generated images. They keep turning out creepy.
In this case, the third individual from the right in the first 'group of people queued for the Barbie movie' has a bulging insect-like right eye, a long center tooth in her mouth, and shares a torso with the person to her right.
In the third group of such 'people,' the four individuals nearest the left have at least one long vertical pupil, and at least one finger with extra joints.
Not to mention the separate issue that all four such images depict the only patrons of the film being individuals that resemble barbie dolls . . .
I agree, some of these are creepy! I find it amusing, but you're probably right that I should avoid them until these programs get a lot better!
I like it and would like to see more!
They go wrong because you can’t reason your way to truth. Pure reason doesn’t work. Sometimes it works, but you can’t be sure. Plato’s precious dialectic is faulty. It’s why we have the scientific method. And always questioning truth claims. No one has perfect knowledge. Yet the Plato types keep telling us they got all the answers. Zeno wasn’t about to stand in front of the arrow was he. Only the academy could take centuries to figure out why Zeno was wrong, the rest of us already knew. And we knew from experience, math, intuition and reason, not just step by faulty dialectical step till you believe in nonsensical conclusions. Yes I know Zeno and Parmenides were before Plato, they led directly to him. Cheers.