Absolute knowledge(if obtained) gives one the realization of freedom you cant be free if you have no understanding of what you are free of or how to use it.
Well, well, well. Finally. I like how you presented Spinoza’s ideal hence your introduction to a Hegelian dialectical ideal falls neatly into place. However, “Nature or God”, does not explain either and so not all philosophers need to be guided by Spinoza’s dictum. Every pot must sit on its own bottom or it is deemed useless.
Very interesting - But would it not be more fitting to see this conflict between transcendental philosophy and Hegel as more the domain of Fichte, rather than Kant himself? As whilst Hegel does pick apart a lot of Kant, he (imo) seems to build directly on Fichte's furthering of emerging Kantian discourse, rather than Kant himself.
Sorry I took so long to reply. The simple answer to your question is that Hegel rejects Kant's dividing reality into a world of appearance and a world of things in themselves that we can never know. Hegel sees reality as a unity of which we are a part.
@@richardhammerud3809 New subscriber lol, I'm a beginner in Philosophy so can you a detailed explanation of his Hegel's criticism on Kant? Thank you so much.
@@kendosa1 What's your point? Yes, all humans are animals. So? Just because something belongs to a group doesn't mean that every aspect of it is also part of the group. Spirit refers to the human only. Animals cannot raise existential questions, ponder the meaning of existence, or conceptualise death, and it is not a matter of intelligence since chimpanzees have the intelligence of 3 year old children, and toddlers of that age are, at least theoretically, able to understand what death is or what the question "what's the meaning of life" is referring to. Humans are the only animal with language, allowing us to have knowledge of things completely independently of our practical experience, which no animal can do.
💖💖💖💖Thank you so much! Why is it so difficult for philosophy professors to explain un easy terms like you do! 🤔
How lucky I am to have stumbled upon this channel today 🙏
Thank you very much. I appreciate your work.
Thank you for this very astute presentation
Very clear and concise.
Absolute knowledge(if obtained) gives one the realization of freedom you cant be free if you have no understanding of what you are free of or how to use it.
lifesaver
Well, well, well. Finally. I like how you presented Spinoza’s ideal hence your introduction to a Hegelian dialectical ideal falls neatly into place. However, “Nature or God”, does not explain either and so not all philosophers need to be guided by Spinoza’s dictum. Every pot must sit on its own bottom or it is deemed useless.
Very interesting - But would it not be more fitting to see this conflict between transcendental philosophy and Hegel as more the domain of Fichte, rather than Kant himself? As whilst Hegel does pick apart a lot of Kant, he (imo) seems to build directly on Fichte's furthering of emerging Kantian discourse, rather than Kant himself.
Thanks for making philosophy accessible to mere mortals belonging to the time constrained productive class…
By why does Hegel reject Kant?
Sorry I took so long to reply. The simple answer to your question is that Hegel rejects Kant's dividing reality into a world of appearance and a world of things in themselves that we can never know. Hegel sees reality as a unity of which we are a part.
@@richardhammerud3809 New subscriber lol, I'm a beginner in Philosophy so can you a detailed explanation of his Hegel's criticism on Kant? Thank you so much.
Sir you have not talked as you titled ....
Was this mistitled? Almost no discussion of Kant?
Sounds like teleological taoism. Is that a fair sketch?
All humans are animals. So he must not know he was talking about animal spirit.
It doesn't matter that humans are a type of animal. Spirit can only be human.
@@georgepantzikis7988 animal spirit
@@kendosa1 Why are you repeating the words "animal spirit"?
@@georgepantzikis7988 all humans are animals.
@@kendosa1 What's your point? Yes, all humans are animals. So? Just because something belongs to a group doesn't mean that every aspect of it is also part of the group. Spirit refers to the human only. Animals cannot raise existential questions, ponder the meaning of existence, or conceptualise death, and it is not a matter of intelligence since chimpanzees have the intelligence of 3 year old children, and toddlers of that age are, at least theoretically, able to understand what death is or what the question "what's the meaning of life" is referring to. Humans are the only animal with language, allowing us to have knowledge of things completely independently of our practical experience, which no animal can do.