Matthew 1:1-16 The genealogy of Jesus Christ
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 січ 2012
- An attempt to write out the genealogy of Jesus Christ as found in the first 16 verses of Matthew, all to music. Andrew Peterson wrote the superb accompanying song which is taken from his musical called "Behold The Lamb Of God".
![ЛЕБЕДЕВ у ДУДЯ: муху не обманешь 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E74h5fvVrqs/mqdefault.jpg)
The tone, melody, and they way he sang this reminded me of the Goodness of God. Jesus came from people who fell into sin were broken and healed back up by God for plan for us all. ❤
Great video! Very creative and useful.
Great song thank you
I am in Bible quizzing and need to memorize this for the big quiz
Thank you so much ! Hi to Turkey Churh .
Shalom
oh yea such a good video x
It's even worse than that. Because Jeconiah is in that lineage any offspring can't inherit the throne due to a curse from God.
"Thus says the Lord:
‘Write this man down as childless,
A man who shall not prosper in his days;
For none of his descendants shall prosper,
Sitting on the throne of David,
And ruling anymore in Judah.’”
(Jeremiah 22:30)
*
So, even if he were allowed as an adopted son to inherit (and he wouldn't be) he is of a Davidic branch that is banned by God from the throne.
God bless
And very good pictures Abbey church
Nice...I would like to know more about the last relatives of Christ!!
Thank you! I needed to come who came from who. The lineage came from Abraham, Judah and David ( Kingship). Matthew 1
we watched this at school x)
i just did to at school
I have the whole genealogy memorized.
Niceee
same, except you would be an expert by now since this comment was 9 years ago, about earlier this year or last year i began to memorize this genealogy from Adam to Jesus
Haha, neat video! Well done :)
As family Jesus is line to be King as He is Joseph’s eldest son. He is adopted into the kingly line.He is also born to David’s line through Mary.
🙏🏼🙌😀
As a matter of fact it is true, as well as significant, because Joseph carried the line of the kings of Judah. Jesus, being Joseph's adopted son, inherited that lineage from him.
Wowwwww!!!!
Great job!!!!👏🏾 👍🏾
How did you do this?
Can you teach me?!
Can you share the guitar chords for this?
Thanks for letting us know. But who was Joseph's father "to the Jewish leaders"? Because that's the issue here.
You know the whole thing that’s a big generation and you know the whole family that’s crazy
How to get this song?
What are the guitar chords for this?!
Banger in RE lmao
nice find. how do you think they'll try to circumvent it?
Joseph named Jesus giving him legal status as Jesus' father on Earth. Kinda like adoption... And the genealogy is very relevant for the Jewish culture because the Messiah would come from David's line.
I have a question: If Joseph wasn't Yeshua's biological father, only his legal guardian, how then is Yeshua of royal blood? Mary is not part of this opening genealogy. Am I missing something?
Mary is also the daughter of David, but not Solomon. Luke 3:31. Jesus is able to be King because of being the heir to the throne from Joseph. He is thus of the house of David. In Luke Jesus is of the lineage of David, but not the royal line. Mary and Joseph combine that Jesus is of the house and lineage and royal line of David.
to clear up the confusion here Joseph the father of Mary in not the Joseph in Luke the husband of Mary. It just a translation problem that has been over looked.
But now we know that the Joesph in that geneolgy wasn't Miriam's husband Joesph, it was her father Joesph. A common name. She married a man with the same first name as her father. This makes verse 17 correct.
Yep. Her husband Joseph lineage is in luke. He's the son of Heli.
The genealogies of both Mary AND Joseph are listed in the Bible, and both are important. Joseph was not the biological father of Jesus, but Jesus, being adopted by Joseph, was still a legitimate heir to his lineage.
lyrics would be appreciated
i never said that the genealogy of his stepfather was not relevant just that he was not a step son to everyone else to everyone else he was Biological son and Joseph does accept Jesus as his son so people call him son of Joseph
actually that's not a shifting, but an asking for evidence.
it would be interesting to see your evidence that an adopted child could legally claim the throne
Dude, I'm not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand. Jospeh's genealogy IS relevant, because he was the legal father of Jesus. That is why Matthew (and thereby this video) related his ancestry. And biological lineage was taken care of in Luke, so both legally and biologically, Jesus was a descendant of David.
Why does it say jecoiakim even though you wrote jeconiah.:)I like the song.
Jehoiakim... I noticed that too.
Around 1:25 you say Jehoiakim, but write Jeconiah. Pretty cool, though... God bless you.
No, both genealogies are from Joseph. According to Matthew 1:16, Joseph's father was Jacob, but according to Luke 3:23, Joseph was the son of Heli. The classical apologist's response is that Luke actually means "Heli's son-in-law", but the original Greek reads ὢν υἱὸς, ὡς ἐνομίζετο Ἰωσήφ τοῦ Ἠλὶ ("being the son -as was supposed- of Joseph, [the son] of Heli"). The word υἱὸς means "son" or "descendant", so biologically connected. If Luke really meant "son-in-law", he would have written γαμβρός.
That is only 13 generations but in matthew 1:17 says its 14 generations
Nehemia Gordon found 2 late manuscripts of Hebrew Matthew that have “Joseph the father of Miriam”. So that makes 14. She was married to a man with the same first name as her father. Matthew is her lineage, and Luke is her husband's lineage.
Well actually, you are the one making the claim an adopted son can inherit the royal lineage, but not yet given evidence for it. Like sabin97 correctly pointed out, I'm merely asking for evidence from the claim-maker who carries the burden of proof, which is you in this case. Unless you can persuade me that it was possible for an adopted son to inherit royal dignity from his stepfather, my point that Joseph's lineage doesn't matter still stands.
Jacob has 12 son he didn't had Jeues dad worny jospe
JACOB SHOWS UP TWICE? WTH?
Shifting the burden of proof, are we?
How was Jacob the father of Joseph (Jesus's stepfather)? He was the father of Old Testament Joseph. I have never understood that.
Two different people can have the same name. :)
14 + 14 + 14 = 42 but count them it's 41. Jesus is unlucky # 13. So, not word of G-D if you can't count. Jeconiah is counted twice, giving us a clue to the curse in Jeremiah.
To Hell with you... it's forty-two.
Matthew 1: 16 , 14:55 why jesus lineage chart, why a proof?
prophesized that messiah will come in david descendant
Why Jesus relate a son, Jesus 11 ? Mary madagence and Jesus... Tamar? Daugther.
Why Jesus and Mary had other son? I can t remember his name is jose or
Jesus and Mary madagence had children , why? Jesus 11 ( second son) , daughter tamar, other son, Josephus. Why evidence?
so he was an impostor?(not being a true descendant of joseph)
otherwise the genealogy of his step-father is 100% irrelevant.
sorry the genealogy of stepparents is irrelevant as they dont share dna. you do not descend from them.
this video is not about any bloodline. it doesnt even mention luke(which we can discuss later)
could you provide evidence that an adopted son could legally claim the throne?
if he was the son of joseph then he wasnt divine. so which is it? not divine, or not the son of joseph?
usurpers appear legitimate to the people they fool, are you saying jesus was an usurper to the throne?
did you not watch the video?
it gives the genealogy of joseph, and then just says mary was his wife
and her son(not his) was jesus.
the genealogy of joseph is irrelevant if jesus is not his son.
you are a descendant of your father, NOT of your stepfather.
I guess you never heard of adoption. By law an adopted son is equal to children conceived in the marriage. I have adopted grandchildren. They are mine as much as if they came into the family by birth.
@@brucejane7395
not sure if you have studied any biology at all(i'm assuming you are from usa).
your grandchildren are family, that's undeniable. but their are not genetically yours.
that means for inherited diseases, their medics shouldnt look at you, but at their biological grandparents. because they are not of your bloodline. they are literally not your descendants.
so yes. the genealogy of joseph is 100% irrelevant when talking about jesus.
Really? What evidence do you have that in Jewish law, an adopted son could inherit his stepfather's claims to the throne?
Jesus had no earthly father. Joseph was Jesus' LEGAL father, therefore his lineage was applied to Jesus. You seem to be applying your own cultural version of how things should be to this.
And as I said, two genealogies were given for Jesus in the Bible, one of Joseph and one of Mary, and both of them lead to King David.
Immanuel is from the seed of Dawid...not no HE'SUS XRISTOS !
Mary is descended from David,
You are descended from a snake.
Jewish people don't mess around when it comes to there genealogies they take it very seriously, I'm a Christian and I'm struggling with the fact that Joseph has no relation to Jesus, and Joesph carries the bloodline, and even so if Mary carried the bloodline i never heard of a woman being the head in genealogies.
I have just asked the same question. How then is Yeshua of royal blood if he didn't inherit DNA from Joseph. It doesn't make sense to me. I'm not trying to be a scoffer or attack the Bible, I genuinely want to know the truth.
Adoption. In those days, adoption wasn't where parents adopted babies; rather, they adopted full grown men if they didn't have a child to inherit and carry on the line. Here is the mind-blowing part about Jesus' lineage... Jesus was the biological son of Mary, who was a descendant of the tribe of Levi, the tribe which God had set apart for priesthood. Jesus IS our High Priest!!! Rightfully so. But Joseph was His father too, by adoption in a sense, and thereby becoming a descendant of the royal lineage meaning He IS our rightful King!!! He is the King Priest, who reigns justly over us and AT THE SAME TIME is the One who atoned for us. His bloodline is the perfect outpouring of God's wisdom to show us that Jesus is both our High Priest AND King. There is no need to fear His genealogy! It just strengthens His claim as the Son of God. :)
While a woman...I am not sure, Tamar, was actually Judah's woman. Albeit, she was the mother of his twin sons Perez, and Zelah, I think it a bit of a stretch to call her...'his woman'. However...I suppose that line fit well with your little diddy. So be it.
But Joseph had nothing to do with the birth of Christ
to the Jewish leaders Jesus WAS Joseph's son i say this to both of you
and i repeat
did you not watch the video? it is about the genealogy of joseph, not mary.
the genealogy of joseph is irrelevant as he was not the father. you are not a descendant of your stepparents, but of your parents. it's not cultural, it's basic biology.
my original post still stands(you probably should re-read it after you re-watch the video)
this has been resolved for so long its not funny. one more time. the lineage in matthew is marys. when translated HUSBAND of mary should read FATHER of mary as joseph is a family name appearing earlier twice i think. this resolves the 42 generation issue as well (3sets of 14)
he couldnt have come from this line read. jeremiah 22:24-30....see what you think.....
to the Jewish leaders Jesus WAS Joseph's son
It might help if you do some more of your own research and you will find that it is
Nice sounding song with funny drawings. A pity it is not true (compare to Luke 3,23-3,38 and 1 Chronicles 3,10-16) or not important (because Jesus was supposedly born of a virgin, so Joseph's genealogy doesn't matter).
"to everyone else to everyone else he was Biological son" that is definition of an impostor....
are you saying jesus was an impostor?
No Jesus was not the son of Joseph biologically but to everyone else(excluding Mary of course) Jesus was Referred to as the "son of Joseph" because they Thought that he was the son of Joseph
Since Jesus wasn't a blood relative of Joseph, none of those people were related to Jesus. Except for Mary of course.
+Joe Giuffre Mary and Joseph share common descendants. If you compare the genealogy that Luke gives in chapter 3, it states that Joseph is the son of Heli. This was actually his father-in-law since Jacob was his father (Matt. 1). Matthew 1 is Joseph's genealogy and Luke 3 is Mary's. But if you compare them most of the descendants are the same.
Chris Dorman Yep, it all goes back to Noah.
Joe Giuffre “Mary was a direct descendant of King David which gave Jesus the right to ascend the Jewish throne, both through Mary and through adoption by his foster father, Joseph. ... Thus, the genealogy of Christ in Luke is actually the genealogy of Mary, while Matthew gives that of Joseph. (Google)
Love it!!!
i thoguht this was the genealogy of jesus
not of joseph
joseph was NOT the father. either that or jesus was not divine and i assume you believe he was divine.
mary was not a decendant of joseph, unless he was into incest with his own daughter/grand daughter .
got the genealogy of mary? THAT would be the real genealogy of jesus...
This family tree is useless, beacuse Joseph is NOT Jesus's father. : )
no Joseph is not Christ's father, but because King Jeconiah's bloodline was cursed, none of his descendants could sit on the throne of Judah. Joseph is a direct descendant of Jeconiah, and legally is the person who would have the throne if the curse didnt exist. Because Joseph married Mary, his birthright passes on to Christ without being a ascendant of Jeconiah, making him the legal King of Judah. NOTHING in scripture is useless. It all has a purpose even if you dont understand
h8rman The main idea in Christianity is that Jesus' father is God ( also Jesus = God ) ! The only human blood line relevant to Jesus is his mother's ... not a guy's she went to.
***** Matthew's genealogy of Jesus .. Gens are information blocks passed from the parents to the child. It takes two sets of DNA info for the human ( from the mother and the father ) in order to have a new organism ... even if Jesus had just one set from Maria and the other was God's work, still there is no genetic information passed to him from Joseph.
***** "Because Joseph married Mary, his birthright passes on to Christ " ... DNA and birthright are two very different things. The fact is that Jesus is not a son of Joseph and there is no son-father connection here. Also Jesus's father is God. Joseph had nothing to do with it.
You think stepfathers don't count? I was adopted, and I call that man my father now... I was orphaned at the tender age of 49. My new daddy is Jesus!
The Christ is not a biological entity to be born or die. Jesus was the name given to the body. Jesus was born already anointed by the eternal Christ.
I appreciate your comment. My seeing is corrected since that beginning realization. Being born as Christ, The appearance of the one they called Jesus, never suffered under the delusion of separation from God. Therefore, He made no error in consciousness as to believe himself to be the appearance and not the indivisible Spirit.
Wrong
This absolutely make nosense Mary is from Judah Joseph is not