Spin vs Power Racquets - What's the difference and which one should you use?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 січ 2022
- 🤓Website: tennisnerd.net
🛑Patreon: / tennisnerd
🙏Support Tennisnerd: tennisnerd.net/support-tennis...
💌Instagram: / tennisnerdinsta
If you want to support Tennisnerd, please consider buying something from one of our affiliates:
🎾Tennis Warehouse: www.tennis-warehouse.com/?fro...
🎾Tennis Warehouse Europe: tenniswarehouse-europe.com/?fr...
🎾Tennis Only: www.tennisonly.com.au/?from=t...
🎾 Free 14 day trial with TopCourt: www.topcourt.com/n/TENNIS-CQ7...
🎾Learn stringing & customization courses.unstrungcustoms.com/?...
🎾Try Swingvision! swing.tennis/r/tennisnerd
🎾TopSpin Pro: topspinpro.com/ref/tennisnerd/
🎾 Your Super Superfoods: yoursuper.krym8q.net/c/231547...
🎾 Flexbar amzn.to/2YfKbtr
🎾 Angell racquets: www.angelltennis.com/?wpam_id=20
🎾 Tennis fitness courses www.memberstennisfitness.com/... - Спорт
Excellent explanation. I wanted a spin racquet and bought a Head Extreme Graphene 360. It plays stiffer than its 63 RA rating - probably because it is designed to flex in the throat where it's thinner. Also, at only 3 points headlight, it was not possible to get a lot of racquet head speed with it. Racquet head speed is essential to generate the generous spin that spin racquets were designed to create. This problem was remedied with the stiffer and more headlight Head Extreme Graphene 360+ version now on sale. Don't overlook how essential generating racquet head speed is in order to get the most out of spin racquets.
I get the most spin from the racquet I can swing fastest. Currently Prince txt 95 and phantom 93p. When the racquet is head heavy, I can't swing it as fast. Also, when you can swing it faster, you can afford yourself more footwork mistakes/being late
Fascinating, thank you. I’ve recently returned to tennis after a 30 year gap and am on my third racket! The first was a Pure Aero, the second an eZone, and now I have a Blade, which I love. You’ve just described exactly the pros and cons that led me on this journey. I just wish marketing departments could be more open as it would have saved me some cash! All interesting though, and I’m glad I had the experience.
Excellent explanation, tnx
Since I switched to Radikal pro 360+ I had chanced my string set up as well. I feel I master the all-around game perfectly well with it. I add lead at noon and to keep the balance at 315 wrapped it with Wilson leather replacement grip and Signum pro 0.70 mm wet grip soft. The string set up: main; rpm rough (black)130mm // cross; velocity (white) 125 mm(24X23 kg string tension). I have power, I have a decent amount of control, I have heavy spin. I can shift spin to flat power, in control. I feel I'm quite e a lucky player that this set of racquets I can comfortably change gears during the play. I had struggled to gain a coherent relationship with my racquets till I came up with this set-up. Thank you for your postings, I got quite ideas from you to develop the right perspective in choosing the right equipment.
Please compare the Aero vs, Vcore 98 and extreme tour in terms of power, spin, control and comfort. Thank you and love the channel!
Great idea Khalid!
Noted! Thanks!
This video's great! Usually people market power and spin together as a package, so it's nice to let people know they can shop for either more power or spin without necessarily having to take both!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Some strings have power and spin label, some spin and control... can you explain what exactly
Excellent overview - thanks for putting this together!
Glad it was helpful!
Great lecture! What I experience is that I am not a spin or power guy! not enough control!
Im looking for thin control.beams not heavy and moderate balanced. rather small head. my choice now:
HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige S.
(almost same specs like my old Head LM Radical MP;)
The thin profile at the throat is for brush aerodynamics?? I question that. The original thin throat on the Babolat rackets was built in to the original Babolat mold that they purchased from Pro Kennex - specifically the racket mold for the Pro Kennex Ceramic Destiny. This was a design feature for incorporating flex in the throat, with stiffness in the head. An extra wide head had certain benefits, but a lack of feel that all the other Pro Kennex rackets have. The thinner throat was the solution. I suspect it has a lot more to do with flex than aerodynamics.
These types of videos are great! Would be cool if you could make a video on thin box beam frames why they have such great feel.
Will do!
Nice video, I appreciate the complexity of the topic. Matching those frames with right strings, and change it frequently, is then the other key, because the strings are much more stressed. So my view is, pick the racquet that fits you and use the right strings to express the potential. A Spin o Power racquet with a 20/30 hours old bad poly is a nasty combination.
I got used to the 16x18 pattern of the Prince Phantoms. Controllable spin
Great video
In the future control spin racquets video, Please include the vcore 95 cuz might be smallest head size example
Coming up soon, Stefanno!
Hello so im farely new to this sort of information, ive been playing for a couple years and tried a bunch of racquets. I have a heavy topspin on my forehand shots (maybe because of my grip?) and pretty flat shots from my backhand side, so i have settled with the Wilson pro 97 v13, I'm not sure why I love it so much, I feel like I have more precision and control, I love the sound but my question is am I playing with the wrong stick? Am I not getting the most out of my game because of not using a spin racquet?
Thanks for this! Ive been juggling the decision which racquet to get: spin or power. And unrelated: please no mug near the racquets. I was afraid it would hv got knocked over! Haha
Very helpful video! I definitely learned something new. I appreciate you posting!
Great video! But I always have such question: which category does Pro Staff 97 belong to? I mean the normal version of PS97 but not RF97. From my personal side I hit more flatter, but I still want to add some spin to achieve more forgiveness. I am a one-handed backhand player. Thank you.
Control racket for me in a hundred sq inch. String tension maintenance is improved and you still get spin from the wider spacing.
I had a demo of a good friend's new VCore 98 and Ezone 100.
I really liked the swing&feel with access to power&spin by the 98 VCore. The Yonnex Poly Tour Pro string did the trick for controlled power and spin. It was fun to play with it.
The 100 Ezone had Babolot RPM Blast. It hit well. It had had to much power and it's frame was to big for my play style.
I did not like the racquets enough to give up my Wilson Pro Staff RF97V13 or RF97L. But, the top spin experience helped me pick a potential Yonnex Poly Tour string to enhance my Wilson racquet features. I've used RPM Blast in other racquets. At lower tensions for me it gives good control, feel and durability. So, instead of finding a racquet, I found a couple of strings to punch up the fun in my play. If you are looking for new magic, try a suitable string to aid your play style. It's definitely a less expensive way to boost racquet play.
The easier to notice, firstly, power and spin racquets mostly both have power. Then look at the racquet's neck, there should only 2 types: 6-strings or 8-strings. The 6 strings at the neck is a spin racquet.
I wonder where you'd put the Head Extreme Tour on your list...
Hi Jonas, thanks for the informative content. I play with a lot of spin - but have had some success in getting more weight/power on my shots by going for a more control orientated frame (currently new Vcore 97 18x20) - I can still generate enough spin with the racquet... Used to just go for spin frames!
What would be a good spin/control choice?
Please test the Addas GTX Pro.
I'm wondering why there was no mention at all of how string tension affects control and spin. I would think that would be pretty important.
More string tension = lower spin potential right? Since the strings can’t move?
good explanation for this topic... wish there was an all round racquet, but guess such a stick wouldn't have any advantage...
Rackets and strings and tensions and weight, balance, and swing weight create a bunch of sliders. When you move one slider another moves in the opposite direction. It's all a compromise. The best rackets for you will be those that have a set of sliders you prefer with how you swing, your goals on court, and so on.
Great video! Could you tell a little bit about yourself? Why have you moved to Malta, how long have you been living there etc. It could be interesting i think
Thanks Andrej, I will do that in a future video.
would have been nice to show some of the features you were talking about to the camera
What is your pick for the tennis racket with the most power and the best feel???
How about Fed using string “savers”? It doesn’t allow strings to move at all, but strings bite the ball better and spins it. It’s not Rafa style shot but still plenty spin
There was a chart I saw last year using data over a few months worth of tournaments on the ATP tour from a few years ago and measured average RPMs on backhands and forehands. The leaders were obviously players like Nadal, Berretini, and Casper Ruud. These players largely use spin oriented 100 inch rackets, with the odd exception like Thiem.
Obviously spin, power, and control can he achieved with various types of setups (player swing style and goals etc play such a big role in what setups will help them with what), so it's not like in this case you need a spin 100 to create spin, but many spin oriented players will opt for such a racket much like how many great servers have opted for extended length frames like Isner, Roddick, Tsonga etc and many flatter strikers who target smaller targets will opt for smaller head sizes and denser string patterns (Medvedev, for example) and so on and so forth
Where do you put the Wilson Blade? I’ve been told it’s for control
The blade comes with both 16x19 or 18x20 string bed so it depends
@@roman2374 16x19 is mine
Great explanation. Please do a Extreme tour vs Ezone 98 2022 battle.
Hi new to the sport but was wondering would my backhand slice benefit more from a spin racquet or a control oriented 95 18/20 racquet? Cheers!
Control rackets for sure. Slice you want easier Low trajectory shots
@@wanzacharywanisa5762 ok gotcha, but at the same time would the smaller 95 head size negatively affect the slice? Thanks for the reply!
The smaller head size also moves faster through the air. Just try not to pick a very heavy one for now. Till you have good timing. 310g
@@jorgeandrescoppiano.5715 that’s a really good point, thanks for the reply. I was considering the Dunlop CX 200 tour. It seems to have most of those characteristics. Do you think that’s a good choice?
@@Helios_17_ happy if it could help! The 200 Tour is 95 head size and 315g. It could work if you can handle the heft. But I think CX200 98 305g would be a better fit for entering the sport and get yourself rocking those ground strokes 😁😎
How do you know which creates more spin? Have you compared them?
Yes
@@Tennisnerd Thank you for answering! How did you compare spin?
Mannarino hits the ball flatter than anyone but uses a pure aero!
Yes, flst, but spinny as well. But it has a lot of side spin instead of top spin.
Title:What's the difference. Start: the similarities...
I love Rafa, but I use a Novak racquet. Go figure. 🤷♂️
Speed Pro is definitely a more well rounded racquet than the PA. Aero has so much pop it forces me to play in ways I don’t care for.
@@curttheboywonder maybe add weight? I think I have to hit the gym like rafa so I can swing the speed pro faster for more spin. FHs are fine, they land deep and with pace. BHs are flat and consistent, but consistently lacking in spin and power.
@@charlesdang2557 if you allow me, if your fhs are good then it could be a technique thing, maybe add more weight transfer forward, while brushing low to high
@@jorgeandrescoppiano.5715 Thank you Jorge. I will work on that this week
@@curttheboywonder I think its important to be aware that what works for one won't work for another. Your experience with the Aero obviously is not shared by many non pros in the world and many pros on both the WTA and ATP tour. Yet at the same time you're definitely not alone in your experience with the Aero. I think it comes down to swing style and preferences on court. The aero has supreme shot security with the right player, and this could be a player who plays with a lot of rpms or perhaps someone who enjoys the high launch angle. Often, when I encounter players who are against the Aero in real life I find that its because they swing very aggressively for small targets and need help keeping balls in and/or they don't play with enough spin to get the spin to dip the ball back in from its high launch with the racket.
I had the wilson clash and had terrible elbow pain. Then I switched to head gravity and no issues whatsoever. Just saying, that the clash isn’t necessary arm friendly.
Tennisnerd - I have a quick question. Before i do it, id thought i would ask you first. I was thinking of converting my 18x20 to 18x19 by skipping a main. Have you ever tried this set up? In a players frame with a 95 sq in head? I heard Novak does this.
So you’re saying that Roger Federer who use a string savers which decreases string movement doesn’t want more top spin on his shots