Ce char avec des équipages courageux...ont fait face... En 1940 Le blindage de ce tank à sauver l'officier solitaire dans sa tourelle Le Vendée... X années après...cette homme me montré son char avec émotion.... veille photo jauni au combien... historique. Ce char servit...pour beaucoup d'exemplaires...très améliorer....par la suite... Le Lee,le sharman,le t34... Souffrant de nombreux... problèmes Ce fut un char...illustre des combats de 1940.... Merci pour la vidéo... Cordialement Un très bon like...👍👍👍 Respect au riz ,pain ,Sel...de ces sombres années A Dunkerque et ailleurs... ces eux,.. les héros..
I would have liked to see our tanks evolving over the years of the second world war if Franc had not lost in June 1940... In my opinion in this case in 1945 the French tanks were monstrous and with monstrous power.
Well... There is (or was) the post WW2 French monster tank ARL 44! But even that one was outdated before it went into service. A design lineage going back to the Char B1, it was basically obsolete by the end of the 1940s.
@@coolman8208 il parle de la pièce que l'on voit en arrière plan à 1'43: du 75 sûrement pas car elle est bien trop grosse...le 75 c'était le canon casemate du B1b...
J'aurai bien aimé voir nos chars évoluant au fil des années de la seconde guerre mondiale si on n'avait pas perdu en juin 1940... A mon avis dans ce cas en 1945 les chars français auraient été monstrueux.
Le chars FCM F1, dit chars de rupture de 139tonnes. un seul exemplaire mis en service en 1940 fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCM_F1 Et le FCM 2C de 1921, en 10 exemplaire. fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCM_2C
Stonne montre justement qu'il ne vaut pas grand chose a l'echelon opérationnel. Flavion, Abbeville et Moncornet, démontrent qu'il est incapable de remporter une victoire ou d'avoir une valeur stratégique. Aujourd'hui c'est le char le plus surestimé du début de la SGM. D'ailleurs, en 1940 les soviets sortent les premières versions du T34 et du KV1
In the end what saved some individual Char B1s (and some of the battles they fought in) in the summer of 1940 was #1 their thick armour, better than the average early war tank from both sides; and #2 the average anti tank gun had a calibre of only about 40 mm. The one crew member only cupola of French tanks was a major design mistake. The commander had too much to do. Many French tanks were used piecemeal. The Germans often concentrated their armour, making local breakthroughs easier. A huge tank like the Char B1 should have been designed with a larger turret ring, and a bigger turret and a bigger multipurpose gun, so that the 75 mm hull gun would not be needed. But the French were already running out of time. The British Matilda II (good armour) and the American M3 (separate small AT gun and large HE gun) each had design elements similar to the Char B1. They were not bad tanks, certainly not in the first part of the war. But they were also not very good tanks.
Increíblemente los franceses tenían mejores tanques que los alemanes al principio de la guerra con un fuerte blindaje y razonable potencia de fuego creo que este tanque destruyo muchos panzers🇨🇵
I bet the rear turret hatch is rusted solid in that position because it can never be closed anyway because hanging out there is the only way the TC can see anything.
Char B1 Meh stupid tank Clicks at video Char b1? Never knew it really existed. Char B1 That's running oh thats nice Char B1 Spitting flames Wauw that tanks is just epic!!!!!
It is a cool tank yes but the turret was much too small. It should have had 3 soldiers in it and the biggest gun should have been a long barreled gun in the turret..
Yes but it's low velocity and was meant to fire HE rounds for anti infantry/gun emplacement/bunker use. It could not be aimed horizontally, so you had to turn the whole tank to aim. The main gun in the turret was a high velocity low caliber anti tank gun.
MustYouHaveAUsername The hull 75mm could fire an antitank round - APHE (Tungsten capped) 40 mm penetration at a range of 400 meters; then explode(hopefully) inside the enemy tank. Still, the Colossus(as the Germans nicknamed it) was a formidable heavy tank, WHEN PROPERLY EMPLOYED, which sadly was not usually the case. Say le Guerre!
+Giang Nguyen Andthe turret mounted gun as bigger than the guns mounted on German tanks in 1940... One on one the Char B1bis was the most dangerous tank on the battlefield in May 1940.
***** In terms of the fighting, the B1bis, when it got into actions where the Germans had to attack it head on, the French tank generally one. One B1bis in the area around Sedan managed to hold off several German attacks on a village by itself, which speaks as a testament to the strengths of its armor and firepower, which no German tank in 1940 could match... And in many cases the French didn't necessarily always have their tanks alone. A lone B1bis was a very good strong point, but the ultimate defeat of France isn't on how many tanks the French made, and in fact in 1940, the French had MORE tanks in service than the Germans did, or in what tanks they made... as many French "light tanks" proved to be better protected than Germany's tanks and tanks like the SOMUA S35 and B1bis had the real potential to turn the tide. In the fighting at Hannut, where France managed to get the sort of head on clash of tanks that they wanted, the French won the tactical engagement in northern Belgium. The problem was that the fight at Hannut was not against the main German thrust, which came farther south. This was a result of Gamelin's thought that the Ardennes would be impassable to tanks and thus why Sedan was practically unguarded with few of the heavy weapons that France had and the strategic reserve, originally at Rheims, removed to fight in northern Belgium. From there, the lack of tactical development in the 20s and 30s compounded France's problems... This, however, has NOTHING to do with the Char B1bis or how many were made. Had the French either guessed right that the main German thrust would be through the Ardennes, kept their strategic reserve in place, or updated their tactics in the 20s and 30s... they would have had a very good chance of winning in 1940 and turning the B1bis into the French "Tiger."
Every one of those I've ever seen running is blowing flames. It's a big, gas V12 running on magnetos of course. They run really well when they are under power, it sounds great. But they slobber and blow flames when idling and when the power is backed off. Did they all do that? Was it impossible to advance the timing on the mag, did it have a hose and a funnel for a carb?
The germans did not use the 88 for tank killing during the invasion of france. The used a much smaller 37 mm anti tank gun at that time which could not penetrate the front of the Char B-1 so they aimed for the grill on the side of the tank to knock them out. With the 88 there would be absolutely no need to aim for that grill since then 88 could penetrate the char B-1 from any angle and any distance. Allso the 88 was originally not an anti-tank gun but rather a anti-aircraft gun that was modified to a tank killing role during the battle in tunisia.
@@curious5661 no the lateral grill had the same armor performances as the standard sides, not less, the germans only "belive" that this was less armored...
@@leneanderthalien It's false. Major Paul Huard from 4DCr, was at Montcornet de Gaulle's attack, clearly stated that the grid is a weak point of the armor. No need to be scientist to know that a grid is always hardless than a full plate. Inside the space behind the grid, the hull is like a round trap.
@@curious5661 Rommel used the 88 at Arras the 27th of may 1940 against Matilda I and II 4 88gun were on Mont de Caubert at Abbeville to stop the attack of de Gaulle's 4DCr. The 88 gun was designed as anti tank since the begining, already defending the airfileds against T26 during the Spanish Civil War. And 3 people thumbs up your message ? Why, how ?
@@BFVK I cannot find any evidence for your claim that the 88 was designed to be an anti tank weapon. I know it was used in that role and perhaps you are correct in saying that it was used much earlier. But I'm pretty sure it was designed to be an anti-aircraft gun. The fact that it excelled in the direct-fire role does not take away from that. Oh and there's no need for you to be snarky.
C'est fous de se dire que se char malgré son imposante carrure peut aller.....encore plus vite et dire que c'était l'un des char les mieux blindé de la première guerres mondiale 😧
Aussi impressionnant qu'inefficace. Incapable de gagner une bataille, il n'a aucune valeur stratégique. Son seul point fort est le blindage, élément le moins important sur un char. Sa consommation est délirante. Regardez et écoutez le moteur a 2:47 quand il monte la rampe, le bruit d'un moteur d'avion, le moteur est poussé dans les tours, les pots d'échappement comme deux jolis chalumeaux, a ce moment la consommation d'essence est très élevée. Eh bien, en combat, en tout terrain, c'est la même consommation, le meme régime moteur car le pilote doit franchir des obstacles, des creux de terrain, ou "foncer" vers un couvert. Lors de son raid sur Moncornet, le B1 bis a eu besoin de 2 ravitaillements pour franchir 25 km ! A Abbeville des B1 bis ont du ravitailler 2 heures après le début de l'attaque, un combat en tout terrain avait vidé les réservoirs en quelques minutes ! Quand a la 1er DCr, elle est vaincue a Flavion, en cours de transfert vers le front, par une panne sèche... En plus d'etre lent, le B1 bis picole comme un trou. Le "autonomie 150 km" sur la fiche technique du char ce n'est qu'un chiffre sur du papier. Ce chiffre est obtenu en laboratoire par la consommation d'un litre d'essence selon le régime moteur idéal, le résultat 150 km est donc déduit par le nombre de litres que contient le réservoir. Ne croyez pas qu'on a rempli le char pour le faire rouler et qu'on a mesuré la distance parcourue au moment de la panne sèche... Rien que le fait de rouler sur route en dur avec une conduite souple MAIS en convoi militaire (respecter les distances, l'allure) réduit de plusieurs kilomètres l'autonomie théorique des fiches techniques de tous les véhicules. Oui il a de la gueule, oui il est impressionnant, mais pour gagner la guerre ce n'est qu'un tas de ferraille sans valeur.
BFVK 1551718 : t'est un gros con d'ignare: le char Tigre par exemple avait MOINS d'autonomie que le B1b et ça n'a choqué personne , la conso du B1b était absolument normale pour un moteur de 300cv tirant 31 tonnes ,quand à sa valeur au combat, 13 panzer 3 et 4 détruits par un seul B1b à Stonne c'était rien? ...pauvre naze...
@@leneanderthalien Tu as déjà lu des livres ? Avant d'insulter les autres de gros con ignare, lis des livres... "le char Tigre par exemple avait MOINS d'autonomie que le B1b et ça n'a choqué personne " Ben si DUGLAND, ça a choqué tout le monde, comme pour la consommation du B1 bis. Tous les livres sur le Tigre mettent en avant sa limitation opérationnelle a cause de sa trop forte consommation... Sur la consommation du Tigre, puisque tu ne sais pas lire, au moins écoutes cela, si tu comprends le français bien sur... ua-cam.com/video/9qQQJJB7qF0/v-deo.html Et du haut de tes hormones d'ados tu prétends insulter les autres d'ignares ? Mais c'est quoi cette génération de mal polis incultes qui ramène leur gueule sans avoir lu un quart de la moitié de ce que j'ai lu ??? Quand j'étais ado je n'insultait pas les anciens qui disaient des choses plus matures que moi... Tu n'en as pas connu, mais quand un chef de char sur S35 m'a dit que son char était mal conçu car il était débordé de taches dans sa tourelle, je devais faire comme toi ? Du haut de mes 14 ans j'aurais du l'insulter en lui disant que c'est un con ignare ? "Monsieur l'ancien combattant, vous etes un ignare imbécile" ??? Et oui, je ne suis pas un ado millenium, j'ai rencontré des gens que tu ne rencontreras jamais car ils sont morts aujourd'hui. Des gens a qui on ne dit pas "gros con ignare" parce qu'il dit un truc qui froisse ta fierté patriotique.
At some point, this joke makes no sense. French army wasn't "reversing" no more than other armies in History. Ok, Frenchs lost against Germans in 1940... they lost against german army, one of the best. But for exemple, Americans have lost the Viet Nam war in 1975 - after three desperate offensives - against Viet Cong... they lost against something who is not even an army, against disordered farmers with guns. So, please, just have a brain and learn who was really weak in wars.
MrDaleplan For the record, British Army was fighting on the continent too. They were wiped out and they fled across the channel while French Army was covering their ship boarding. The loss rate during the Battle of France was higher than during the WW1. Later in North Africa from May 26th to June 11th, 3700 men of the Free French Army stopped 37 000 men of Africa Corp commanded by Rommel in Bir-Hakeim (desert in Libya) while Montgomery was regrouping his troops in El-Alamein. This joke just prove how ignorant you are and is an insult to thousands of brave men who fought and died.
The allies were not prepared for Blitzkrieg in 1940, even USA didn't have the Sherman at this time, which they designed after the Somua s35 after the battle of France. And yes germans had the best tactics, but they couldn't win against two fronts later in the war.
Ce char avec des équipages courageux...ont fait face...
En 1940
Le blindage de ce tank à sauver l'officier solitaire dans sa tourelle
Le Vendée...
X années après...cette homme me montré son char avec émotion.... veille photo jauni au combien... historique.
Ce char servit...pour beaucoup d'exemplaires...très améliorer....par la suite...
Le Lee,le sharman,le t34...
Souffrant de nombreux... problèmes
Ce fut un char...illustre des combats de 1940....
Merci pour la vidéo...
Cordialement
Un très bon like...👍👍👍
Respect au riz ,pain ,Sel...de ces sombres années
A Dunkerque et ailleurs...
ces eux,.. les héros..
Это, конечно, легендарный танк. Приятно видеть действующий экземпляр.❤
Wow - I've never seen one operating before!
I would have liked to see our tanks evolving over the years of the second world war if Franc had not lost in June 1940... In my opinion in this case in 1945 the French tanks were monstrous and with monstrous power.
Now we will not find out
look the B1 Ter :)
Well... There is (or was) the post WW2 French monster tank ARL 44! But even that one was outdated before it went into service. A design lineage going back to the Char B1, it was basically obsolete by the end of the 1940s.
look at the ARL tracteur
This big gasoline engine has a beautiful sound!!
The Chat 1B was more than a match for the German tanks one destroyed 13 German tanks in under one hour.
+Ad Mirer its crew skills too
it was "pierre bilotte" in his tank "eure"
@@kevinDMC12 and he became war minister
oui,à Stone dans les Ardennes
Most of them came back with many holes in it from German tank shells and the Germans took some and put there tank cannons on it
Absolutely beautiful.
As much as i love the German tanks. I can’t dent that this is one cool looking tank.
I love this tank, nice to see one moving.
À 1:43, un joli obusier de 155 court Schneider de la Grande Guerre, roues à pneus pour la traction automobile: une arme encore très efficace en 1940.
Mon pseudo: 155 17 18
C'est justement parce que mon arrière grand père a utilisé ce canon en 1917-18 dans le 101e RAL
Maurice Viel 155 ? Je crois pas plutôt de 75 vérifier vos sources.
@@coolman8208 il parle de la pièce que l'on voit en arrière plan à 1'43: du 75 sûrement pas car elle est bien trop grosse...le 75 c'était le canon casemate du B1b...
This tank is one of my favorite tank.
The main Gun on the hull of B-1 bis is so cool.
Later same design was in M3 Grand/Lee
Mon char préféré sur War Thunder.
J'aurai bien aimé voir nos chars évoluant au fil des années de la seconde guerre mondiale si on n'avait pas perdu en juin 1940... A mon avis dans ce cas en 1945 les chars français auraient été monstrueux.
Le chars FCM F1, dit chars de rupture de 139tonnes. un seul exemplaire mis en service en 1940
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCM_F1
Et le FCM 2C de 1921, en 10 exemplaire.
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCM_2C
On peut également s'en faire une petite idée avec l'ARL44 : fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARL_44
J'ai découvert ce char il y a bien longtemps grâce à un bon vieux kit Matchbox :)
Celui avec le FT17 et la portion de route et la façade de maison détruite ? Souvenirs souvenirs ^^
Love to see the neutral steering at least in some seconds.
Siempre me gustó este tanque, está perfecto después de tantos años.
Классная.тачка
Damn that afterburner!
lmao
jolis allume cigares à l arrière
Ouais XD
Ce sont les flageolets.
Le meilleur char de son époque #stonne
J'étais à Stonne modelizm.forum2x2.ru/t646-topic
Stonne montre justement qu'il ne vaut pas grand chose a l'echelon opérationnel. Flavion, Abbeville et Moncornet, démontrent qu'il est incapable de remporter une victoire ou d'avoir une valeur stratégique.
Aujourd'hui c'est le char le plus surestimé du début de la SGM. D'ailleurs, en 1940 les soviets sortent les premières versions du T34 et du KV1
@@BFVK des prototypes de t34 et le 1v1 avait énormément de problème aussi
@@optionmarshall Je l'admet, par exemple il fallait taper au marteau pour passer les vitesses du Kv1.
Cela n'empeche pas la nullité du B1bis.
@@BFVK la nullité de presque tout les char de l'époque même le tigre
Et le porte char de creusot-loire juste a coté, un monstre.
Un très bon blindage, protecteur pour les tankistes
In the end what saved some individual Char B1s (and some of the battles they fought in) in the summer of 1940 was #1 their thick armour, better than the average early war tank from both sides; and #2 the average anti tank gun had a calibre of only about 40 mm.
The one crew member only cupola of French tanks was a major design mistake. The commander had too much to do. Many French tanks were used piecemeal. The Germans often concentrated their armour, making local breakthroughs easier. A huge tank like the Char B1 should have been designed with a larger turret ring, and a bigger turret and a bigger multipurpose gun, so that the 75 mm hull gun would not be needed. But the French were already running out of time.
The British Matilda II (good armour) and the American M3 (separate small AT gun and large HE gun) each had design elements similar to the Char B1. They were not bad tanks, certainly not in the first part of the war. But they were also not very good tanks.
🇫🇷Viva la France 🇫🇷
Flanders has a tank? Watch out, Simpson!
yea :D
Increíblemente los franceses tenían mejores tanques que los alemanes al principio de la guerra con un fuerte blindaje y razonable potencia de fuego creo que este tanque destruyo muchos panzers🇨🇵
they were not better, because they had one man turret, could be better on spec but didnt perform as good on field
@@mok822 they were much better, but the french military doctrine not
I bet the rear turret hatch is rusted solid in that position because it can never be closed anyway because hanging out there is the only way the TC can see anything.
The tank is bigger then my first apartment.
what a behemoth!
The engine sound like angry tiger
Char B1 Meh stupid tank
Clicks at video
Char b1? Never knew it really existed.
Char B1 That's running oh thats nice
Char B1 Spitting flames
Wauw that tanks is just epic!!!!!
Un monstruo antediluviano de la 1a. G.M.
si
you are a ignorant...
Segunda guerra mundial
amazing
フランス自由軍、技術の結晶👍
Le meilleur char de 1940👍
le b1 est un char normand un tres bon char d'ailleurs une puissance pour moi fenomenalle
+noah paris c'est un char francais
+Babouche Et c'est ou la Normandie hein ?
majuachilo production En France
majuachilo production J'me suis trompé avec un pays dsl
Y'a pas de mal ^_^ .
After burners
It is a cool tank yes but the turret was much too small. It should have had 3 soldiers in it and the biggest gun should have been a long barreled gun in the turret..
Best
Un engendro.
Not all tanks can be entered through a door.
The hull canon is bigger than the main one :]]
Yes but it's low velocity and was meant to fire HE rounds for anti infantry/gun emplacement/bunker use.
It could not be aimed horizontally, so you had to turn the whole tank to aim.
The main gun in the turret was a high velocity low caliber anti tank gun.
MustYouHaveAUsername The hull 75mm could fire an antitank round - APHE (Tungsten capped) 40 mm penetration at a range of 400 meters; then explode(hopefully) inside the enemy tank. Still, the Colossus(as the Germans nicknamed it) was a formidable heavy tank, WHEN PROPERLY EMPLOYED, which sadly was not usually the case. Say le Guerre!
+Giang Nguyen Andthe turret mounted gun as bigger than the guns mounted on German tanks in 1940... One on one the Char B1bis was the most dangerous tank on the battlefield in May 1940.
+Sam Nary Agreed...just hard to convince military Francophobes ;-)
***** In terms of the fighting, the B1bis, when it got into actions where the Germans had to attack it head on, the French tank generally one. One B1bis in the area around Sedan managed to hold off several German attacks on a village by itself, which speaks as a testament to the strengths of its armor and firepower, which no German tank in 1940 could match...
And in many cases the French didn't necessarily always have their tanks alone. A lone B1bis was a very good strong point, but the ultimate defeat of France isn't on how many tanks the French made, and in fact in 1940, the French had MORE tanks in service than the Germans did, or in what tanks they made... as many French "light tanks" proved to be better protected than Germany's tanks and tanks like the SOMUA S35 and B1bis had the real potential to turn the tide. In the fighting at Hannut, where France managed to get the sort of head on clash of tanks that they wanted, the French won the tactical engagement in northern Belgium.
The problem was that the fight at Hannut was not against the main German thrust, which came farther south. This was a result of Gamelin's thought that the Ardennes would be impassable to tanks and thus why Sedan was practically unguarded with few of the heavy weapons that France had and the strategic reserve, originally at Rheims, removed to fight in northern Belgium. From there, the lack of tactical development in the 20s and 30s compounded France's problems...
This, however, has NOTHING to do with the Char B1bis or how many were made. Had the French either guessed right that the main German thrust would be through the Ardennes, kept their strategic reserve in place, or updated their tactics in the 20s and 30s... they would have had a very good chance of winning in 1940 and turning the B1bis into the French "Tiger."
Every one of those I've ever seen running is blowing flames. It's a big, gas V12 running on magnetos of course. They run really well when they are under power, it sounds great. But they slobber and blow flames when idling and when the power is backed off. Did they all do that? Was it impossible to advance the timing on the mag, did it have a hose and a funnel for a carb?
the engine was a 6 cylinder 307hp Renault modified aviation engine
@@leneanderthalien later upgraded to a Renault V12, with 100bhp more than the original I6
Sur les coter vers le bas au niveau des chenilles il me rappelle le leclerc
Cool vid 😀
Put a turbocharger on that thing!
En cccp Russian Pologne ils dit que les chars francais ont 7 vitesse arriere et 1 vitesse avant et standard drapeaux blanc aussi
C'est des clichés ont en fait aussi sur la Pologne l'Italie la Belgique et les anglais
certains chars ont un inverseur qui leur permet théoriquement de rouler aussi vite en avant qu'en arrière...
Звук мотора какой-то. Тракторный тамже. Стоять должен. Бензиновый 306 лошадок
Obviously not the original gearbox.
2:47
thought they were all destroyed? or is this one of the captured german ones?
I do not know, but in any case, he has the original French cupola and not the cupola modified by the Germans.
it remains about 10 B1 bis a little everywhere in France without the B1 bis country which is in other country
the B1b was captured, modified and use from the germans as flame trower and howitzer
one awesome french tank ... I use it a lot on my PS4 :-) fast reload
as long as your penetrate the enemies armor lol. i use this too but on xbox.
PRÉSENTATION CHARS B1 ET FT17 / MOURMELON (reportage photo) 1989 / 1994
loup-mouton.blogspot.fr/2017/04/presentation-chars-b1-et-ft17-mourmelon.html
Bonne lecture.
char Renault FT pas FT17...
what is that hole on the side?
+Andreas Karma So the driver can go to toilet without exiting the tank :D
+datsun83 match with french,i always tho that they are sensitive lol
+Andreas Karma it's the carrier pigeon entry.
emergency exit.
Mud chute
Cool mais impôt
i, with all my soul, hate tanks... because they are made to kill...
but damm this killer looks cute
inside a tank of this size, you can put beds for the crew!
Rare.
The 88s would aim for the big side grill.
The germans did not use the 88 for tank killing during the invasion of france. The used a much smaller 37 mm anti tank gun at that time which could not penetrate the front of the Char B-1 so they aimed for the grill on the side of the tank to knock them out. With the 88 there would be absolutely no need to aim for that grill since then 88 could penetrate the char B-1 from any angle and any distance. Allso the 88 was originally not an anti-tank gun but rather a anti-aircraft gun that was modified to a tank killing role during the battle in tunisia.
@@curious5661 no the lateral grill had the same armor performances as the standard sides, not less, the germans only "belive" that this was less armored...
@@leneanderthalien It's false. Major Paul Huard from 4DCr, was at Montcornet de Gaulle's attack, clearly stated that the grid is a weak point of the armor.
No need to be scientist to know that a grid is always hardless than a full plate. Inside the space behind the grid, the hull is like a round trap.
@@curious5661 Rommel used the 88 at Arras the 27th of may 1940 against Matilda I and II
4 88gun were on Mont de Caubert at Abbeville to stop the attack of de Gaulle's 4DCr.
The 88 gun was designed as anti tank since the begining, already defending the airfileds against T26 during the Spanish Civil War.
And 3 people thumbs up your message ? Why, how ?
@@BFVK I cannot find any evidence for your claim that the 88 was designed to be an anti tank weapon. I know it was used in that role and perhaps you are correct in saying that it was used much earlier. But I'm pretty sure it was designed to be an anti-aircraft gun. The fact that it excelled in the direct-fire role does not take away from that.
Oh and there's no need for you to be snarky.
C'est fous de se dire que se char malgré son imposante carrure peut aller.....encore plus vite et dire que c'était l'un des char les mieux blindé de la première guerres mondiale 😧
Hans, get ze Luftwaffe.
Aussi impressionnant qu'inefficace. Incapable de gagner une bataille, il n'a aucune valeur stratégique.
Son seul point fort est le blindage, élément le moins important sur un char. Sa consommation est délirante. Regardez et écoutez le moteur a 2:47 quand il monte la rampe, le bruit d'un moteur d'avion, le moteur est poussé dans les tours, les pots d'échappement comme deux jolis chalumeaux, a ce moment la consommation d'essence est très élevée. Eh bien, en combat, en tout terrain, c'est la même consommation, le meme régime moteur car le pilote doit franchir des obstacles, des creux de terrain, ou "foncer" vers un couvert.
Lors de son raid sur Moncornet, le B1 bis a eu besoin de 2 ravitaillements pour franchir 25 km !
A Abbeville des B1 bis ont du ravitailler 2 heures après le début de l'attaque, un combat en tout terrain avait vidé les réservoirs en quelques minutes !
Quand a la 1er DCr, elle est vaincue a Flavion, en cours de transfert vers le front, par une panne sèche... En plus d'etre lent, le B1 bis picole comme un trou.
Le "autonomie 150 km" sur la fiche technique du char ce n'est qu'un chiffre sur du papier. Ce chiffre est obtenu en laboratoire par la consommation d'un litre d'essence selon le régime moteur idéal, le résultat 150 km est donc déduit par le nombre de litres que contient le réservoir.
Ne croyez pas qu'on a rempli le char pour le faire rouler et qu'on a mesuré la distance parcourue au moment de la panne sèche...
Rien que le fait de rouler sur route en dur avec une conduite souple MAIS en convoi militaire (respecter les distances, l'allure) réduit de plusieurs kilomètres l'autonomie théorique des fiches techniques de tous les véhicules.
Oui il a de la gueule, oui il est impressionnant, mais pour gagner la guerre ce n'est qu'un tas de ferraille sans valeur.
Un peu comme le char tigre quoi :)
BFVK 1551718 : t'est un gros con d'ignare: le char Tigre par exemple avait MOINS d'autonomie que le B1b et ça n'a choqué personne , la conso du B1b était absolument normale pour un moteur de 300cv tirant 31 tonnes ,quand à sa valeur au combat, 13 panzer 3 et 4 détruits par un seul B1b à Stonne c'était rien? ...pauvre naze...
Ferme ta gueule quand on y connais rien on s ferme sa gueule clodo
@@leneanderthalien Tu as déjà lu des livres ? Avant d'insulter les autres de gros con ignare, lis des livres...
"le char Tigre par exemple avait MOINS d'autonomie que le B1b et ça n'a choqué personne "
Ben si DUGLAND, ça a choqué tout le monde, comme pour la consommation du B1 bis. Tous les livres sur le Tigre mettent en avant sa limitation opérationnelle a cause de sa trop forte consommation...
Sur la consommation du Tigre, puisque tu ne sais pas lire, au moins écoutes cela, si tu comprends le français bien sur...
ua-cam.com/video/9qQQJJB7qF0/v-deo.html
Et du haut de tes hormones d'ados tu prétends insulter les autres d'ignares ? Mais c'est quoi cette génération de mal polis incultes qui ramène leur gueule sans avoir lu un quart de la moitié de ce que j'ai lu ??? Quand j'étais ado je n'insultait pas les anciens qui disaient des choses plus matures que moi...
Tu n'en as pas connu, mais quand un chef de char sur S35 m'a dit que son char était mal conçu car il était débordé de taches dans sa tourelle, je devais faire comme toi ? Du haut de mes 14 ans j'aurais du l'insulter en lui disant que c'est un con ignare ? "Monsieur l'ancien combattant, vous etes un ignare imbécile" ???
Et oui, je ne suis pas un ado millenium, j'ai rencontré des gens que tu ne rencontreras jamais car ils sont morts aujourd'hui. Des gens a qui on ne dit pas "gros con ignare" parce qu'il dit un truc qui froisse ta fierté patriotique.
@@BFVK C'est vous qui commencez à insulter les autres. Commencez par être poli, on vous répondra poliment.
Being a French tank It would have been quicker to reverse this on
At some point, this joke makes no sense.
French army wasn't "reversing" no more than other armies in History.
Ok, Frenchs lost against Germans in 1940... they lost against german army, one of the best.
But for exemple, Americans have lost the Viet Nam war in 1975 - after three desperate offensives - against Viet Cong... they lost against something who is not even an army, against disordered farmers with guns.
So, please, just have a brain and learn who was really weak in wars.
ʎɯɐᗡ bet youre fun at parties
MrDaleplan For the record, British Army was fighting on the continent too. They were wiped out and they fled across the channel while French Army was covering their ship boarding. The loss rate during the Battle of France was higher than during the WW1.
Later in North Africa from May 26th to June 11th, 3700 men of the Free French Army stopped 37 000 men of Africa Corp commanded by Rommel in Bir-Hakeim (desert in Libya) while Montgomery was regrouping his troops in El-Alamein.
This joke just prove how ignorant you are and is an insult to thousands of brave men who fought and died.
The allies were not prepared for Blitzkrieg in 1940, even USA didn't have the Sherman at this time, which they designed after the Somua s35 after the battle of France. And yes germans had the best tactics, but they couldn't win against two fronts later in the war.
@@yankee.98 and, not forgott that Germany had in 1939-40 close twice the population of France...many forgot this "detail"...
говнотанк
Зато в нем можно ходить. ))) и двери есть
@@gariktankist Ёсли ёсть двёри и можно ходить, тогда я живу во французском танкё!
FYI, all WW2 French tanks have a built-in pole with a white flag which can be raised by the tank commander by pulling a lever inside the vehicle
El Guapo son of a bitch
...
all
American tanks have a built-in pole with a retarded flag which can be raised by the tank commander by pulling a lever inside the vehicle
Yummy yummy ! American propaganda ! 😋
No seriously,France still have 1115 battles won,what about your country ?