Wartime Churchill Tank driving with latest Challenger 2 Tank

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 480

  • @williamcll
    @williamcll 11 років тому +349

    A young challenger have a weekend jog with his great grandfather.

  • @Shunteration
    @Shunteration 9 років тому +630

    *Churchill*: So, laddie, have you sparred with any of the Germans yet?
    *Challenger*: Uh, grandpa, we've been allied with them since the '50s...
    *Churchill*: Oh, yeees, I remember! We won the war in the end! Jolly good show. Then, what about the Russkies? Have you shot any bolshevik tanks yet?
    *Challenger*: Well, some secondhand T-54s and -62s, yes, but... Grandpa, the Soviet Union dissolved over twenty years ago...
    *Churchill*: Oh, alright, alright. Sorry, chap, I'be been loosing track of time, it'll happen to you when you get old, or rather, IF you get old, as it goes in our line of service.
    *Challenger*: True...
    *Churchill*: . . .
    *Challenger*: . . .
    *Churchill*: ...So, have you shot down any frenchies yet?
    *Challenger*: Grandpa, I swear to God...!

    • @mrbordmechaniker
      @mrbordmechaniker 8 років тому +28

      Made my day xD

    • @techmaniac43
      @techmaniac43 8 років тому +12

      made my day x2 hahahaha xD

    • @Twirlyhead
      @Twirlyhead 8 років тому +14

      Tanks for the memories.
      PS. You forgot the East Germans.

    • @Shunteration
      @Shunteration 8 років тому +5

      They used Soviet tanks as well.

    • @Twirlyhead
      @Twirlyhead 8 років тому +3

      +SONBoomer
      But Britain never "allied" with them I think.

  • @margaretmcclurkin868
    @margaretmcclurkin868 10 років тому +73

    My Father was a Churchill Tank driver and mechanic, 6th Guards Tank Brigade. Nulli Secundus.

    • @kayagorzan
      @kayagorzan 4 роки тому

      Did your dad told you how it feels?

    • @laksamanasuhendra5868
      @laksamanasuhendra5868 4 роки тому

      :0
      Cooooooooooool

    • @jackkruese4258
      @jackkruese4258 3 роки тому

      Brave man facing the Germans in a Churchill tank, it’s a piece of junk.

    • @georgeallen7101
      @georgeallen7101 Рік тому

      @@jackkruese4258 might be worth remembering the 3 Churchill tanks that climbed a gradient in North Africa that the Germans considered to steep for a tank to climb and proceed to reduce a column of artillery and support vehicle to burning scrap . Did l mention the one that could fire a jet of flame 120 yards ? Infantry tank that did a good job, handled by well versed crews . They were Murdered at Dieppe because they were on a suicide mission,

  • @vthegoose
    @vthegoose 2 роки тому +20

    I absolutely love the Churchill. Just the way it slowly trundles along, not a care in the world, just moving with such confidence

  • @clintrat1932
    @clintrat1932 10 років тому +57

    Haha, the Challenger driver constantly glances sideways at G/ma when they're near... worried to scrape the lovely Churchill! Marvellous restoration.

  • @LordDarthHarry
    @LordDarthHarry 9 років тому +383

    Challanger: come on Grandad. You need the excercise, pick up the pace a bit!
    Churchil: Quiet you! back in my day I use to fight Tigers you know!
    Challanger: Yes Grandad.....i know.....
    Churchil: and there were Panthers too!
    Challanger:....yes Grandad....

    • @hypernoid0178
      @hypernoid0178 8 років тому +33

      +LordDarthHarry
      Churchill: Plus I heard those Jerries got themselves a new tank called the Leopard! I wish I could've shot em up...
      Challenger: Uh, ahem, yeah.... about that....

    • @REALjohnmosesbrowning
      @REALjohnmosesbrowning 8 років тому +16

      Churchill: What? Jerries are Jerries all the same, right?
      Challenger: Erm... yeah, sure. We'll go with that.
      Churchill: Great! Is there one around here to shoot up?
      Challenger: I'm going to go home now

    • @LoderryPlaysPVP
      @LoderryPlaysPVP 7 років тому +2

      lol

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 7 років тому +17

      Chieftain: Son, what are you blabbering on about with granddad? You're 2nd cousin's family and great-uncle are coming over!
      (Door opens)
      Centurion: Chally, how long is it been?
      Challenger: Hey great-uncle.
      M60: Cheiftain, we've arrived, we've brought Sherman and Lee over too. As well as Abrams is that alright?
      Chieftain: Leave Churchill, Sherman, and Lee to talk, let the kids play around. Doesn't Leopard 2 live in the neighborhood to? See if he can come over!
      Challenger: Dad...
      Chieftain: Fine. Where's your older brother?
      Challenger: No clue. Left this morning. Didn't want to see the family.

    • @HO-bndk
      @HO-bndk 5 років тому +2

      Challenger: Ok grandpa. All I've ever done is shot a few ancient Iraqi T-55s and killed a friendly Challenger and some British IFVs.

  • @Orca19904
    @Orca19904 5 років тому +45

    War Thunder after the version 1.87 update.
    On a serious note, it's truly amazing the size disparity between these two tanks; if you were to see a Churchill by itself you might think it was a big tank, but then you see it next to the Challenger 2 and it looks downright tiny next to that monster.

    • @theminuskai7453
      @theminuskai7453 Рік тому +3

      Modern MBTs would be considered super heavy tanks by ww2 standars, only difference is now they can be fast and reliable thanks to modern engines

  • @GarlicAvenger
    @GarlicAvenger 4 роки тому +21

    "Just going for a walk with my grandpa. He may be old and slow, but he has done more than enough to deserve dignity and my respect."
    I think this in my recommended in 2020 because I watched a video of a veteran who turned 100 years old get an Honorary Colonel rank.
    And this is much the same, tank you to all the machine spirits that rest with the souls of our forefathers.

  • @biggles1483
    @biggles1483 9 років тому +115

    Right, this is going to sound strange, but did anyone else dribble a little bit at the close up view of the Churchill's suspension in action?!

    • @wisedonkey7644
      @wisedonkey7644 7 років тому +9

      Satisfying

    • @roberth.goddardthefatherof6376
      @roberth.goddardthefatherof6376 7 років тому +5

      just some coil springs going up and down, you should see HVSS on an m4 in action.

    • @BHALT0S
      @BHALT0S 6 років тому +3

      I thought the clanking sound was much more satisfying, like the sound of something reliable and heavy.

    • @wisedonkey7644
      @wisedonkey7644 6 років тому +6

      Why not just agree that everything on the Churchill is satisfying

    • @VRichardsn
      @VRichardsn 5 років тому +2

      Not at all. Seeing suspension at work is really nice. There is an ice footage around here of a Panther going at speed over bumpy terrain while remaining perfectly horizontal. Mesmerizing.

  • @TheIhredpower
    @TheIhredpower 8 років тому +108

    I like how the Churchill has such an effortless look to it when it moves over the terrain. I know watching Tiger 131 move is like watching something in pain as it clanks along.

    • @REALjohnmosesbrowning
      @REALjohnmosesbrowning 8 років тому +21

      The Churchill moves pretty fluidly for something of that age, and especially, size and weight. Like a Sherman.

    • @iannordin5250
      @iannordin5250 5 років тому +45

      @@REALjohnmosesbrowning the Churchill has designed from the ground up to move through the worst obstacles. It was made with the infantry-support role in mind, so it sacrificed speed for the ability to go and climb wherever the solders went. Shermans, Tigers, Panzers, T34s, etc, may have been faster, but the Churchill was far more "rugged." Its transmission was designed to to effectively balance and carry its weight with a limited amount of wear or stress. Meanwhile the other heavies were constantly on the verge of snapping their own. The churchill, like many other british tanks, had problems, but transmission and suspension wasn't one of them. Its innovative differential also meant it was one of the few tanks of the war capable of fine movement, which is one of the reasons it appears so graceful for such an old design.

    • @Surv1ve_Thrive
      @Surv1ve_Thrive 4 роки тому +9

      @@iannordin5250 Ian thanks an excellent summing up of the Churchills strengths in mobility.

    • @matymajuk
      @matymajuk 2 роки тому

      I dont think so, tiger just feels heavier

    • @xxfyrezgamerxx6279
      @xxfyrezgamerxx6279 2 роки тому +2

      Even though the churchill tank was a slow moving tank it managed to beat hill climbs very goodly

  • @etaylor495
    @etaylor495 6 років тому +23

    “You may be well armoured kid, but can you do this?”
    *Furiously neutral turns on the spot *

  • @5Ring
    @5Ring 8 років тому +49

    Reminds me of some of the WOT random battles I've been on the bottom end of.

  • @legendaryexplorer8119
    @legendaryexplorer8119 3 роки тому +10

    1:54- one of the most satisfying sounds to listen to the tracks clatter along

  • @xxstormxx1941
    @xxstormxx1941 9 років тому +174

    churchill: "Im too old for this shyat".

  • @soulessshadow5356
    @soulessshadow5356 3 роки тому +16

    It surprises me how small the Churchill looks compared to the Challenger 2, I never realized until now just how huge the Challenger 2 is in basically every aspect(height, width, and length)

  • @joughton89
    @joughton89 8 років тому +29

    look at the way the turret of the challenger keeps elevation, technology is sweet.

    • @gavinlee9781
      @gavinlee9781 5 років тому +1

      Jack O Shermans did that in the 40’s

    • @andrewwoodhead3141
      @andrewwoodhead3141 4 роки тому

      @@gavinlee9781 actual footage?

    • @bulbusarues
      @bulbusarues 3 роки тому

      @@andrewwoodhead3141 Shermans had gyroscopic stabilizers, though not to such as good effect.

    • @andrewwoodhead3141
      @andrewwoodhead3141 3 роки тому +1

      @@bulbusaruesOnly in elevation. It was an early piece of technology , rarely used in the field. I mean , kudos to the Americans for outfitting their tanks with such a cutting edge , experimental even , piece of tech, but it proved to be somewhat unpractical . It took a long time to warm up from a cold start , it could only handle relatively slow speeds , and ,without stabilization in the lateral plane ,it failed to confer any significant combat advantage.
      In any case, few of the troops were trained in its use.
      The first really effective use of giro stabilization on a gun tank was the British Centurion Mk 3. With Stabilization in both planes and linked to an analogue computer, the 84mm 20 pounder gun could be laid accurately at speeds of up to 15 MPH. This doesn't seem much today , but 15 MPH was the top speed of that Churchill !

    • @vthegoose
      @vthegoose 2 роки тому

      @@gavinlee9781 you’re technically correct, but the Sherman stabilizer was a very simple vertical axis stabilizer. It basically allowed the gun to remain more or less on target after stopping. The modern 2 axis stabilizers allow accurate fire on the move

  • @captaindreadnought212
    @captaindreadnought212 9 років тому +49

    i love how theres a warning light on the challenger, like who isn't going to see a 62 ton tank coming? :')

    • @1234fivedude
      @1234fivedude 8 років тому +4

      +Captain Dreadnought blind people

    • @sircalculus1448
      @sircalculus1448 8 років тому +8

      The Churchill driver ;p

    • @ThePsiclone
      @ThePsiclone 5 років тому +6

      well, at least one German woman didn't when one ran over her car when she pulled out infront of it...she was lucky and wasnt hurt badly. The car was less fortunate, that got a flat that a spare tyre couldn't fix.

    • @Mister_Kourkoutas
      @Mister_Kourkoutas 4 роки тому

      You’d be surprised haha

    • @CustodianHadrian
      @CustodianHadrian 4 роки тому +3

      Never underestimate mankind's lack of attention, especially in modern times.

  • @hcrun
    @hcrun 9 років тому +36

    It's a cute little thing. Makes me hope that it follows me home so I can keep it. :)

    • @pancakepredator8474
      @pancakepredator8474 9 років тому +18

      actually rhe churchills huge compared to other tanks of the era

    • @Tuhoeterra
      @Tuhoeterra 9 років тому +5

      +PancakePredator ikr and feared, you dont get called a "Croc" for being cute and cuddley lol

    • @TigerBaron
      @TigerBaron 8 років тому +14

      The Croc was the Flamethrower version of it, not the one displayed in the video tho.

    • @mikereger1186
      @mikereger1186 3 роки тому

      @@TigerBaron not the only tank converted as a flamethrower either... I seem to recall the ubiquitous M4 doing it in some photo or other...

    • @TigerBaron
      @TigerBaron 3 роки тому +1

      @@mikereger1186 There were 2 versions.
      One was deployed to Europe and called Crocodile as well and the other was the Zippo deployed by the USMC in the Pacific.

  • @AWMJoeyjoejoe
    @AWMJoeyjoejoe 3 роки тому +5

    I love the challenger. Even with all that extra armour she can still shift! What a beast

  • @Boskov01
    @Boskov01 3 роки тому +8

    Wow, I never realized the Churchill was so small. So many times in different media like cartoons and video games, they make the Churchill look so much bigger. Still, my favorite British Tank (Second only to the Mark IV Male, because come on, gotta respect the classics man).

    • @jimtaylor294
      @jimtaylor294 Рік тому

      To be fair; Tanks in general were smaller & lighter then 😂
      The Churchill though ended up with thicker frontal armour than the Tiger I, and could turn a lot quicker than it too 😉 .
      (though *using* the Nuetral Steer capability was discouraged by the brass, due to the extra training being deemed too time consuming 🤦‍♂️)

  • @squagthekingsquid969
    @squagthekingsquid969 Рік тому +1

    it brings me joy to see that there are still relic tanks that are fully functioning.

  • @Cerberus919
    @Cerberus919 10 років тому +64

    Challenger 2 is like, let me follow u great grandfather Churchill...

    • @mikereger1186
      @mikereger1186 3 роки тому

      Technically it’d be the Centurion as its Great Grandad, it was a separate split from the cruiser line which ended at Comet and I-tanks ending at Black Prince.

  • @garydunken7934
    @garydunken7934 10 років тому +8

    Nice to see a Churchill that can drive around after all these years.
    That Challenger 2 is very mobile like a medium-heavy. Looks very beefy.

  • @beltfed4624
    @beltfed4624 4 роки тому +59

    Challenger: I'm one of the most advanced pieces of hardware on the battlefield, and I'm packed with millions of dollars worth of highly sophisticated software!
    Churchill: Back in my day, men with strong muscles, nerves of steel, and cast iron guts drove me right into battle! Straight down the enemy's throat! And the most sophisticated thing they had was a radio the size of a shoe box. Keep bragging junior, a little static electric could knock you right outta the game, but a little grease and oil and I'm still as good as ever!

    • @cblue3
      @cblue3 4 роки тому +5

      Challenger 2 can be aimed manually just like the Churchill if fire control systems are lost.

    • @gimmeabreak4435
      @gimmeabreak4435 4 роки тому

      Don’t pit them against each other dude.

    • @SirPwnington
      @SirPwnington Рік тому +1

      Cringe.

  • @lenrat117
    @lenrat117 7 років тому +14

    This is strangely adorable :D

  • @MCMLXXXIV1984
    @MCMLXXXIV1984 2 роки тому +1

    British tank building at its best! The iconic Churchill and the mighty Challenger 2! Magnificient pieces of engineering indeed! With best regards from Germany

  • @GraemePryce1978
    @GraemePryce1978 10 років тому +13

    Great video! I had to chuckle at the warning beacon on top of the Challenger - as if anybody would need to see an orange flashing light before they noticed THAT was coming towards them. lol

    • @willbarber7549
      @willbarber7549 9 років тому +2

      Graeme Pryce Well recently in Germany a young female driver managed to drive into a Challenger 2 on a main round.

    • @GraemePryce1978
      @GraemePryce1978 9 років тому +1

      Will Barber Yeah, I saw a report on that! LOL

    • @willbarber7549
      @willbarber7549 9 років тому +2

      Graeme Pryce How can someone not see a Challenger 2.... Also I believe one of her excuses was that it was "camouflaged"

    • @GraemePryce1978
      @GraemePryce1978 9 років тому +2

      Will Barber I know! lol The camoflage is good but not that good!
      I had to laugh that the car was a write off but the tank didn't even need the paint touching up.
      Good story! :-)

    • @GraemePryce1978
      @GraemePryce1978 9 років тому

      Dan H It's not about to fire, it's taking part in a military display.

  • @khrystree9233
    @khrystree9233 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent quality footage, Churchill seemed quicker than i expected! Great bits of british kit. K

  • @rat_king-
    @rat_king- 5 років тому +13

    say what you want, but that track design, has got to be part of the reason for its good hill climbing

    • @mikereger1186
      @mikereger1186 3 роки тому +1

      I vaguely recall that the originals performed poorly and were soon upgraded... hence the better performance.

  • @1Maggot1
    @1Maggot1 10 років тому +20

    it's like the grandfather with his grandson

  • @Adam-xd4sb
    @Adam-xd4sb 11 років тому +4

    Such a beautiful, awe inspiring and majestic piece of British firepower. The Challenger 2 that is... the Churchill gets its looks from it's namesake... Tank's lead the way!
    I wouldnt want to be in that drivers compartment, when a lucky SABOT round just happens to penetrate that armor... Yes, I know... It's highly unlikely, but still...

  • @captin-crane3324
    @captin-crane3324 6 років тому +2

    I love seeing new school run with old school

  • @woooster17
    @woooster17 11 років тому +2

    Great to see the evolution of the British Tank clearly here. Tank men are brave men!

  • @ex59neo53
    @ex59neo53 10 років тому +11

    Challenger may be good ,but Churchill made History :)

    • @khrystree9233
      @khrystree9233 2 роки тому

      Remember the Challenger scored the longest range kill on record. K

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet 2 роки тому

      @@khrystree9233 challenger 1

  • @ragerancher
    @ragerancher 10 років тому +6

    Amazing to think that an army of Churchills, which could survive head on with a Tiger at long range, wouldn't stand a chance against 1 modern tank at any range. Technology has come on so much.

    • @UneducatedCraftProEdition
      @UneducatedCraftProEdition 10 років тому +2

      Yeah in history, it sayed that one churchill's armour is stronger than the Tiger tank.
      Still amazing to see now but comparing it with the challenger... Wow the size and speed difference.:P Still very good Historic british engineering right there.

    • @sergeantkazotsky5616
      @sergeantkazotsky5616 2 роки тому

      @@UneducatedCraftProEdition believe you mean the Mark 7, 152mm at the front including the front of the turret. I myself don't know if a Mark 7 ever saw a Tiger in combat, but if it did I'd definitely say it had a more than decent chance of taking the big cat out, though that's just me speculating.

    • @nerd1000ify
      @nerd1000ify Рік тому

      @@sergeantkazotsky5616 Head-on at long distance it would be more or less a stalemate, the Churchill Mk VII had the same 75mm cannon as the standard Sherman which couldn't penetrate the Tiger I's front armour, while at longer distances (more than 500m) the Tiger's 88mm cannon couldn't defeat the Churchill's front plate without super rare APCR rounds. The Churchill is vulnerable within 500m however, while the Tiger is immune to the Churchill's gun unless attacked from the side or rear.
      Of course as an infantry support tank the Churchill was unlikely to meet the Tiger, and if it did then towed antitank guns would likely be close at hand. So the Churchill's best bet would be to retreat and let them deal with the problem.

  • @mavericmorph5358
    @mavericmorph5358 11 років тому +14

    Love tanks of WW2...
    It's when design and tactics really took off, on all fronts.
    I do have a soft spot for the Churchill tho!
    It was a shame we didn't have the black prince or the Centurion in WW2!
    That would have shocked zee Germans!

    • @nickellison2785
      @nickellison2785 2 роки тому

      Black prince was too unreliable and centurion was a few weeks late

    • @stuartburton1167
      @stuartburton1167 2 роки тому

      @@nickellison2785 I don't think the Black Prince was unreliable after all it was basically a modified Churchill with the same engine, transmission and suspension. It was just that it could barely move under its own power. If the BP had a Meteor engine and had arrived on the battlefield in 1943 it might have been a useful heavy.

    • @nickellison2785
      @nickellison2785 2 роки тому

      @@stuartburton1167 If something can barely move under its own power then I would say that’s unreliable, it’ll put loads of strain on the transmission and driveshaft to get it moving at a decent speed. Take the Ferdinand for example, or even the Maus

  • @ashleybevis9769
    @ashleybevis9769 2 роки тому +1

    Would love to no if this was filmed in Bordon/whitehill in hampshire, the old REME training ground, I used to watch the tanks as a kid , in the 80/90s. Brought back fond memories still love tanks to this day❤😊

  • @everythingphil9376
    @everythingphil9376 5 років тому +1

    Wow what a great contrast seeing the two together.

  • @MikesMovies
    @MikesMovies 10 років тому +1

    Fantastic to see a Churchill!

  • @whateverprecisely
    @whateverprecisely Рік тому +1

    Notice the latest tank, when driving over terrain, the gun stays at the same angle relative to the horizon. Truly amazing, active gun levelling

  • @BIOSHOCKFOXX
    @BIOSHOCKFOXX 4 роки тому +2

    In Challenger team is fully equipped ready for combat... in Churchill all mates are in polo shirts and sunglasses ready for the summer season.

  • @spidlenexor
    @spidlenexor 2 роки тому +2

    its amazing to think that absolutely no tank and anti tank vehicle of ww2 could even dent todays mbts with any kind of ordinance, and that a single abrams, challenger, leopard or t80, could wreck havoc on an entire batallion of those tanks by themselves absurdly quickly and out of efective retaliation range

  • @doggonemess1
    @doggonemess1 2 роки тому +3

    I never thought a Churchill tank could look small.

  • @bobcohoon9615
    @bobcohoon9615 2 роки тому +2

    Am surprised at how agile the Churchill can be ! They had an ability to climb slopes very well and get through muck that would stop other tanks

  • @Keinlicht
    @Keinlicht 10 років тому +7

    No need to argue about which tanks were the best guys, the war is over!

  • @sniper9786
    @sniper9786 3 роки тому +1

    Nice ground clearance on the Church

  • @GamingChannel-bg1rz
    @GamingChannel-bg1rz 6 років тому +2

    This is a good tank,I play it all the time

    • @crazy4milsurps
      @crazy4milsurps 5 років тому

      i took a bunch of rounds from a sluggfest with 3 panzers and knocked them out then i got taken out by a 4th on darkest hour. 10 minute battle and was so much fun

  • @HUBdbz
    @HUBdbz 9 років тому +9

    both outstanding tanks

  • @gerardmajax2365
    @gerardmajax2365 4 роки тому +3

    I'm pretty sure the Challenger can't follow the Churchill on extreme cross country slopes. Those tracks can make it climb mountains !

  • @ex59neo53
    @ex59neo53 10 років тому +5

    In fact this video is about a grand-son having a ride with his grand'pa :)

  • @doubledoublekitkatplaygrou2736

    Aww how precious there Bonding 😍

  • @archephoto
    @archephoto 10 років тому +20

    chruchhill 7 is a sexy beast

    • @NUK3B0YHD
      @NUK3B0YHD 10 років тому +3

      It's a Churchill 1 and it isn't a beast.

    • @archephoto
      @archephoto 10 років тому +9

      all churchills where and will always be beasts.

    • @duckluck5639
      @duckluck5639 10 років тому

      TheXtraMan99 KV's never engaged Churchill's, And if they ever got in front of a Churchill VII then their fucked. 152mm of armor vs 90mm...

    • @phil180700
      @phil180700 10 років тому +1

      ***** Churchills where terrible just look at the tracks how bad they where desinged. You cant attack wich such slow an loud tanks

    • @treylaw4705
      @treylaw4705 10 років тому

      sexy tank with a sexyer gun

  • @truongtin3911
    @truongtin3911 10 років тому +4

    It's like a grandad and his grandson walking togheter

  • @MikesMovies
    @MikesMovies 10 років тому +3

    Wish there was a RC model of this!

  • @wellardme
    @wellardme 11 років тому +1

    Such a wonderful video. Thanks for posting:)

  • @TechnicolorYawn
    @TechnicolorYawn 9 років тому +84

    When will WG stop allowing these failplatoons?

    • @binka9066
      @binka9066 8 років тому +1

      pure XD

    • @pukalo
      @pukalo 7 років тому +4

      On April 18, 2017

  • @sbraypaynt
    @sbraypaynt 6 років тому +3

    It’s like a bloke going for a stroll with his grandad

  • @REALjohnmosesbrowning
    @REALjohnmosesbrowning 6 років тому +3

    The first thing I notice is how much louder the Challenger's engine is.

    • @thewomble1509
      @thewomble1509 5 років тому +2

      Churchill had a naturally aspirated 350hp Bedford engine. C2 has a twin turbo,12 cylinder 1,200hp unit.

  • @TheSonic10160
    @TheSonic10160 11 років тому +7

    Bloody hell Churchills are quiet.

  • @somebody9651
    @somebody9651 3 роки тому

    Challenger 2 really enjoys hanging out with his grandpa

  • @markbalcombe9750
    @markbalcombe9750 9 років тому +1

    Took us to invent the tank to deal with the carnage that was The Somme and the Germans to actually "get it" in WW2 and for Britain to play catch up for a long time afterwards. The video succinctly proves the point.

    • @Tuhoeterra
      @Tuhoeterra 9 років тому +6

      +Mark Balcombe thats probably not fair. The Conqueror more than held its own compared to Soviet counterparts. the Chieftain was a marvellous tank and many of its innovations live on in Tanks in current NATO arsenal.

  • @neza6268
    @neza6268 4 роки тому +2

    Challenger: you still got the tea grandpa?
    Churchill: Yes as always, all British tank does that my dear grandson

  • @patchedupdemon7104
    @patchedupdemon7104 9 років тому +2

    how the gun stays level on th c2 looks so cool

  • @funnyguy3D
    @funnyguy3D 5 років тому +1

    You always forget how small tanks were back then and how much bigger they are now, almost makes you think that Churchill isnt the proper size, like it's a miniature version :P

  • @thathorsethatdrivesasherma7003
    @thathorsethatdrivesasherma7003 9 років тому +3

    I don't know why, but I prefer the nice "Hum" of the Churchill's engine against the Challenger's engine sound.

  • @NSYresearch
    @NSYresearch 4 роки тому +1

    Beautiful.... i love British tanks.

  • @ianmangham4570
    @ianmangham4570 Рік тому

    And Churchill is a big tank ,big Challenger is a MONSTERS

  • @emmanuelperez9490
    @emmanuelperez9490 3 роки тому +1

    Good God the Megatron is a beautiful tank

  • @Bravo955
    @Bravo955 6 років тому +1

    It would be kinda funny to see the Challenger crew try to drive the Churchill and see what they think about it, just put go pros on them and let them try to figure out how to get it moving.

  • @johnnochristopher8837
    @johnnochristopher8837 10 років тому +1

    Amazing comparison of ww2 to current tank advancements of the British Army

  • @georgeallen7101
    @georgeallen7101 Рік тому

    Has anyone proved the legend of its abilities to climb gradients of 60degrees plus . My father’s favourite tank , even after A sprocket off one nearly cut him in half.

  • @thejudge-kv2jk
    @thejudge-kv2jk 5 років тому

    Very cool video!

  • @i_nameless_i-jgsdf
    @i_nameless_i-jgsdf 9 років тому +4

    WW2 machines still are more beautiful.

    • @i_nameless_i-jgsdf
      @i_nameless_i-jgsdf 9 років тому

      Joanna Marie Gelera ugly

    • @goatwarrior3570
      @goatwarrior3570 9 років тому +4

      +Joanna Marie Gelera Problem with modern tanks is they all look the same.

    • @jackchanbh70
      @jackchanbh70 9 років тому

      The Axis PoweR i agree

    • @CJ_the_Traveller
      @CJ_the_Traveller 9 років тому +2

      +Abaddon Interitus because it's the most optimised design, tank designers back then designers were experimenting with all sorts of ideas and roles for the tank.
      Not that experimenting has stopped but mostly it's now increasing the survivability of a tank.
      Unless something comes along that questions that optimised design or pushes it out of it's role the overall shape of the tank will remain the same.
      The BMPT is an interesting offshoot of today tanks with an emphasis on a direct infantry support role with more fire-power than current armoured infantry carriers.

    • @goatwarrior3570
      @goatwarrior3570 9 років тому

      Chris Howells tru dat. Not very interesting for tank enthusiasts. Companies like Tamiya may as well start producing a generic modern tank kit and packaging it with a selection of decals for which country and model number you want it to represent hhhh

  • @edim108
    @edim108 Рік тому

    Looking at the grace and speed the Challenger 2 is able to move with it's crazy to think it's almost 25 metric tons heavier than the Churchill...

  • @richsmith8035
    @richsmith8035 9 років тому +1

    I like the Churchill tanks, but talk about TUNNEL VISION for the driver!

  • @RD2564
    @RD2564 Рік тому +1

    You look at the giant hole in the front to the Churchill and Cromwell tanks and you say you to yourself yes, it is no wonder the UK became a 3rd world country shortly after the war. My lord man, how hard is it to angle the glacis plate? The English didn't figure it out until Centurion.

  • @Daehawk
    @Daehawk 9 років тому +1

    I love that the CHurchill is nice and simple...clean. The modern tank looks like it has a ton of junk stuck all over it.

    • @AceTheMM
      @AceTheMM 8 років тому

      Yeah, tank designs today are so boring and bland.

    • @crawler6019
      @crawler6019 8 років тому

      Yes! I've been saying that for years! Back in the day, people were creative and such! Now it's just M1 Abrams look a-likes.

    • @AceTheMM
      @AceTheMM 8 років тому

      CrawlerEnder 935 Exactly!

    • @thewomble1509
      @thewomble1509 6 років тому

      @@crawler6019 That's because Chobham type armour can't be moulded or bent. it is applied in blocks to the fabricated inner shell. The outside armour is just a covering to stop the layout of the laminate armour being visible.

    • @sergeantkazotsky5616
      @sergeantkazotsky5616 2 роки тому

      tbf alot of that stuff is protective equipment, reactive armour panels and like trophy systems and radars an whatnot, personally i kinda like that it looks like its carrying an entire arsenal with it lol

  • @ildart8738
    @ildart8738 2 роки тому

    Why is the stab on on the Challenger? They're just wearing out the gyros and the stab servos.

  • @startingbark0356
    @startingbark0356 5 років тому +1

    Ok now i want to see a TOG II moving around

  • @bumpermanthesecond615
    @bumpermanthesecond615 Рік тому +1

    Modern tanks: smooth armour and sharp edges
    British ww2 heavy tanks: STEEL BOX

  • @drazic13
    @drazic13 Рік тому

    Churchill: Are you coming?
    Challenger: You go ahead son. I'll catch up
    Challenger - thinking to himself: "How times have changed... Just gonna pop the kettle on!"

  • @czdefence
    @czdefence 3 роки тому

    Please, can we use footage from your UA-cam channel for our videos about military cars, trucks a other machines? We tag your channel as a source ,... thank you. :)

  • @EmperorNefarious1
    @EmperorNefarious1 10 років тому +2

    the Churchill isn't really a grandparent of the Challenger 2, The modern tanks are decedents of cruiser tanks like the Crusader and the Cromwell, where the Churchill is an infantry tank.

    • @sotnos3196
      @sotnos3196 10 років тому

      Yes but they both share the same super heavy armour, the churchill was the most armoured allied tank at the time, same with the challenger.

  • @DotDotDotDashDashDashDotDotDot
    @DotDotDotDashDashDashDotDotDot 7 років тому

    Challenger 2: "Grandfather what was it like in world war 2?"
    Churchill: *tells long ass story

  • @Cesarc2
    @Cesarc2 7 років тому

    Otro monstruo antediluviano.

  • @ArtietheArchon
    @ArtietheArchon 10 років тому +2

    chally gets a lot of criticism on the internet for its power to weight ratio but it sure looks nimble in this vid

  • @diggraver2929
    @diggraver2929 4 роки тому

    Are ya winning son?
    We sure are grandad.

  • @arandombattlebrother6608
    @arandombattlebrother6608 4 роки тому

    Dude the effect one the video at 2:18

  • @AceTheMM
    @AceTheMM 8 років тому

    Churchill is the most elegent tank in history.

  • @brogogeta9998
    @brogogeta9998 5 років тому

    Is that a crocodile variant of the Churchill

  • @yatsumleung8618
    @yatsumleung8618 5 років тому

    I'm surprised the Churchill isn't very big... sizes deduced from drawings are sometimes misleading

  • @engasal
    @engasal 10 років тому

    Some people think that the most beautiful thing you can see is a horse majestically running along a beach at sunset....Nah mate, CR2 bombing around an assault course!

  • @atomicace321
    @atomicace321 6 років тому +2

    When the modern tank Starts to wonder why World of tanks hasn't got an update To fix the pairing system

  • @kennethrobinson9893
    @kennethrobinson9893 3 роки тому +1

    Just how small the churchill looks compared to the challenger 2

  • @TigerBaron
    @TigerBaron 8 років тому

    Ah, the grandfather-grandson comparison.

  • @szymkosv8776
    @szymkosv8776 4 роки тому

    2:24 what a hell is that camera effect

  • @chubbycakes6446
    @chubbycakes6446 7 років тому +1

    as the young boy follows his aged father into battle...

  • @fabianthomas7312
    @fabianthomas7312 8 років тому

    big brother by Churchill s side

  • @rednoob8954
    @rednoob8954 7 років тому

    Is that a Churchill mark two?

  • @cpt.shmitt7387
    @cpt.shmitt7387 9 років тому +2

    Is this in Bovington camp?

    • @rsdave84
      @rsdave84 9 років тому +2

      Yes it is, atdu. I was the guy in the turret.

    • @cpt.shmitt7387
      @cpt.shmitt7387 9 років тому

      nice, glad to have met you. I went to Bovington this May

    • @rsdave84
      @rsdave84 9 років тому +1

      Bovington is great, really enjoy going there. I don't really work on the tanks anymore due to a falling out but I'm slowly getting back into it on my own. Just got the go ahead to start work on a kettenkrad and i also own a m151a2 mutt but thats a long way off being done. I will start posting videos as i progress with the projects.

    • @cpt.shmitt7387
      @cpt.shmitt7387 9 років тому

      looking forward to seeing it

    • @Surv1ve_Thrive
      @Surv1ve_Thrive 4 роки тому

      @@rsdave84 how have you been getting on?