@@yukin1990 咪玩？飛得起就已經唔係垃圾，COMAC有 type cert, 航空公司有 C of A, suppliers 有齊DOA, POA 就已經唔係垃圾，全世界有幾多間公司可以做 CS25 嘅大機？啲人笑C919係萬國牌，咁佢地不如試下 set 萬幾個 standards然後叫全世界嘅供應商follow 跟住如期送去上海 assemble然後做 test最後 test flight然後交貨 total flow 嘅 system integration?! 日本仔三菱都做唔到最後蝕幾百億收檔！鬼佬話大陸貨垃圾人講你就信，究竟知唔知飛機係點做？！
Thank you for sharing,very detailed oriented and 100% accurate. When safety compromise either profits,it is totally unacceptable. I remember many years back,there was a lady call 綠茵 ,she always appeared on AM 1400 in Bay Area about autobiography of the rich and famous. You are the next best female personality on air . 👍👍👍👍👍❤️. Keep up the good work.
You are absolutely correct. Boeing was an incredible airplane manufacturing company and I had said many times that 747 was the best airplane Boeing had produced. I remember the first time the 747 had its inaugural flight to Hong Kong in 1970, I was a young boy very interested in airplanes. At that time we lived only 3 miles from the old Kai Tuk Airport. So when I saw the news on TV about the inaugural landing, we all went up to the roop top, waiting for the 747 landing. Let me tell you, the sight was incredible ! We were actually able to see the numbers on belly of the plane and the landing gear! At that time, no body had seen a plane as large as the 747, especially up-close! 30 years later I still love this plane each time I flied to Asia. I never had any concern or worry even during severe turbulence. I felt very safe when I flied this amazing plane. Today, I don't have the same confidence with the 777 or 787 when I travel long-distance. America and Europe have been ridiculing the Chinese-made C919 since its announcement which was designed to compete with the Boeing 737. So far 1,200 C-919 have been ordered by the 3 largest airlines in China. If nothing bad happens in the next 5 years, I believe the C-919 will give the Boeing 737 a run for the money. For other small to medium size anilines in developing countries, the C-919 will be a very attractive alternative for the 737.
Time05:00 Boeing early era > a company ruled by engineers doing business (safety issues cannot be compromised even in conflict with profit matters) Boeing present era > a company rules by businessman knowing engineering matters (profits cannot be compromised even in confict with safety matters)
When morality comes up against profit, it is seldom that profit loses. ★「當道德踫上利益，利益鮮少敗陣。」 ─ Shirley Chisholm，美國首位非裔女性民主黨總統提名候選人 【解讀：很多人因著自身的利益，會選擇違背良知，並作出不道德（甚至傷天害理）的事情。】👉🏻見利忘義
Thanks Vincent, Hang 同其他 Yolo街 嘅觀眾嘅提醒，我想更正一下之前嘅資訊，: Boeing 同 Airbus 唔係唯一嘅商用飛機製造商，佢哋只係全球最大同專注於長途航線嘅製造商。
仲有其他 飛機製造商，例如加拿大嘅 Bombardier、巴西嘅 Embraer，以及日本嘅三菱航空機株式会社（Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation），佢哋主要生產短途航線嘅區域性噴射機。希望呢個更正可以幫大家更清楚了解商用飛機市場嘅情況！😊✈
仲有中國商飛COMAC呢？呢隻係潛質股泥架
@@waikeiauyeung2725 咪玩啦。。。。。。。COMAC仲垃圾
@@yukin1990 咪玩？飛得起就已經唔係垃圾，COMAC有 type cert, 航空公司有 C of A, suppliers 有齊DOA, POA 就已經唔係垃圾，全世界有幾多間公司可以做 CS25 嘅大機？啲人笑C919係萬國牌，咁佢地不如試下 set 萬幾個 standards然後叫全世界嘅供應商follow 跟住如期送去上海 assemble然後做 test最後 test flight然後交貨 total flow 嘅 system integration?! 日本仔三菱都做唔到最後蝕幾百億收檔！鬼佬話大陸貨垃圾人講你就信，究竟知唔知飛機係點做？！
其實唔需要用a350 事件帶出波音事件,每間飛機制造商都有各自既問題,只是波音太千瘡百孔得多, 如果737 max 同777x 唔重新設計或QC 放任不理,換幾多CEO 都冇用, 支持你詳細既解說👍👍
仲要唔好用商人為主嘅文化，應該要以工程師為主文化，回歸初心！
@@yukin1990 商業世界管理層永遠不會去想技術為主的公司如果沒有了前沿的技術去維持公司的長遠發展, 總會有倒下的一天(Compaq, Intel, Sony ,etc) 大把例子可以reference, 短視的只顧商業為主管理層破壞了不少科技公司,可悲
都賣左咁多， 點會重新設計 ？
應根！
條片同你說話的節奏很好，睇聽得十分舒服
好多謝你嘅鼓勵！🫶✨
支持靚女~把聲好好聽😊😊❤❤
其實所有人同公司一樣：
不思進取，唯有落後於人！
多謝支持！❤️🚀
Thanks!
Thank you YS!!
說得精彩啊！廣東話聽起來真親切，其實美國企業大多數都像波音一樣，近這廿年都是以利潤行先，張大部分或全部生產外判以降低成本而忽略技術開發和質量提升，只有Tesla是一個例外。
她是我聽過的廣東話頻道當中-聽感最舒服的一位UA-camr, 字正腔圓說文有調理~而且每次都做足功課👍
Tesla 嘅車其實都係低成本唯先，內籠好簡潔可以按嘅制都唔多，好多操作要靠獨控屏幕，其實唔整按鈕已經係削減成本。
@@johnnyyiu7947我個鬼佬同事買左Tesla, 佢話plastic, 啲人仲以為好野😂，on99😂
@@johnnyyiu7947Tesla 電子零件故障率係幾低下，因為所有software 都係自己設計
係香港話。
Good👍
Thank you Willie!!!
737應該停止生產! 不過波音近幾年真係唔得，不停出事 ! 客機敗給空中巴士，軍用飛機屢次輸比洛克希德同諾格，外太空更加被馬斯克的Spacex遠遠拋離！
多謝！
好多謝你嘅鼓勵！🫶✨
Nice tone and voice . Thanks for the search and putting it all together.
You are so welcome Barry! Happy 2025
Thank you for sharing,very detailed oriented and 100% accurate. When safety compromise either profits,it is totally unacceptable. I remember many years back,there was a lady call 綠茵 ,she always appeared on AM 1400 in Bay Area about autobiography of the rich and famous. You are the next best female personality on air . 👍👍👍👍👍❤️. Keep up the good work.
我好有興趣聽王在的故事，麻煩你呀唔該
講中晒而家的企業問題：
老闆要利潤最大化>>>
主管短期捽到條數就係神仙，為削減開資而凌駕各項專業>>
直接消耗公司的名譽與人才>>>
出問題再請新主管>>>
新主管再捽數搵錢走人.......
外判是常識，管理無道和不容許批評才是核心問題。
加油呀！靚女、支持
靚女❤把聲性感又好聽❤
分析得好詳盡, 講得非常好!
請問幾時會講 737Max 既問題?
出咗片啦
@@yologuy 剛睇左啦! 讚!
You are absolutely correct. Boeing was an incredible airplane manufacturing company and I had said many times that 747 was the best airplane Boeing had produced. I remember the first time the 747 had its inaugural flight to Hong Kong in 1970, I was a young boy very interested in airplanes. At that time we lived only 3 miles from the old Kai Tuk Airport. So when I saw the news on TV about the inaugural landing, we all went up to the roop top, waiting for the 747 landing. Let me tell you, the sight was incredible ! We were actually able to see the numbers on belly of the plane and the landing gear! At that time, no body had seen a plane as large as the 747, especially up-close! 30 years later I still love this plane each time I flied to Asia. I never had any concern or worry even during severe turbulence. I felt very safe when I flied this amazing plane. Today, I don't have the same confidence with the 777 or 787 when I travel long-distance. America and Europe have been ridiculing the Chinese-made C919 since its announcement which was designed to compete with the Boeing 737. So far 1,200 C-919 have been ordered by the 3 largest airlines in China. If nothing bad happens in the next 5 years, I believe the C-919 will give the Boeing 737 a run for the money. For other small to medium size anilines in developing countries, the C-919 will be a very attractive alternative for the 737.
I miss the 747 : (
多謝靚女主持❤❤我個人覺得全美大部分既公司都有類似問題，就係產業金融化，製造業空心化，畢竟華爾街力量太勁，而金融化搵錢快又易，邊有咁多心思製造。btw，你個樣好性感
多謝你嘅鼓勵! ❤️🚀
C919最快今九月將會取得歐盟適航證，唔洗你叫都會坐919
好嘢喎😮，講咗17分鐘居然冇一句廢話👍
哈哈，多謝你嘅讚賞！
Bonnie 嘅片，質量好高，大家CLS 係must😊
好鈡意妳把聲❤
你開場講A350機翼嗰件事，我仲以為你會繼續講落去😂😂， 我都好有興趣airbus嗰單嘢如果你可以講就好喇😝
很好的分享👍.
講得好精彩
由daily crash-10帶來ge優良傳統隔咗廿年後由搭載may crash any second系統ge 737Max繼承
very easy to listen to and the host's voice tone sounds smart. thanks
netflix 都有documentary 講boeing 好腐敗，仲有間諜攝影機揭露生產過程的缺失，越睇越恐怖
Time05:00
Boeing early era > a company ruled by engineers doing business (safety issues cannot be compromised even in conflict with profit matters)
Boeing present era > a company rules by businessman knowing engineering matters (profits cannot be compromised even in confict with safety matters)
濟州航空事故之後再睇一次😢
感謝分享！希望可以分享王座的資料。
是王助
收到 👍
what is the background of this
tuber
之前睇空中浩劫都有好多DC事故，啲觀眾都叫喱個型號飛機做Daily Crash，都唔係冇原因架😂
想了解王助嘅生平事跡
繼ge又一個巨人沒落
多謝Bonnie 嘅科技資訊💪💪💪
近這廿年都是利潤行先, 仲有DEI化 , DEI凌駕各項專業.不容許專業Engineers 批評 DEI 人嘅技術和質量, 去聽証會前又 被人隊冧. 同LA Fires 後果一樣!
有個波音品質經理講出左飛機吾安全, 係佢去聽証會前被人隊冧左, 呢种新聞香港妓者是不可能報的
這就是原因我每次坐飛機時都一定要選擇空中巴士
講下王助好呀👍
非常有趣的講解。繼續努力。非常感謝。
Thx 🙏🏻 Bonnie
波音自收購咗因為貪婪無視產品質量導致死傷無數最終衰亡既麥道之後，就開始被當時麥道既無能管理層滲透取代，變成一樣咁不務正業唯利是圖既公司，會淪落到今時今日咁既田地都係自己攞黎
請在下一集繼續說：波音、然之後說一下空中巴士A380 因為我记得A380開始的时候也因機翼出問题而全面停飛、有波音也很想聽一下由香港去澳門的波音喷射船
Who is Wong Tsoo ?
Very good information ❤
我朋友在波音公司工作了40年，據他轉述波音公司現在的員工和歐巴馬八年後的波音公司員工素質的差別：民主黨政府打着DEI的訴求硬性規定要美國超過500-1000名員工的公司雇用有色人種、同性戀、技術水平未達標的員工。試問波音公司不垮才怪？台灣的台積電遲遲無法在美國亞利桑那州完成建廠，也是拜登政府DEI政策導致。
太多印度阿差員工，遲早會出事啦 ！
有色人種&同性戀跟工作能力有直接關連嗎？ 請展示實質證據。此外，你在Boeing 工作的朋友，是有色人種，還是主流族裔呢？
客觀來說黑專八年以來，黑人因有正罟撑腰都可以做大做强😢
@@patriciang4940 你的智商堪憂啊！(硬性規定要美國超過500-1000名員工的公司雇用有色人種、同性戀、技術水平未達標的員工。)
有這樣的硬性規定 , 這些員工會用心工作 ?
可以告訴你是 "萬中無一"！這就是人性！ 現在嚴重懷疑你爸爸製造你時 , 未盡全力。有所保留。
When morality comes up against profit, it is seldom that profit loses.
★「當道德踫上利益，利益鮮少敗陣。」
─ Shirley Chisholm，美國首位非裔女性民主黨總統提名候選人
【解讀：很多人因著自身的利益，會選擇違背良知，並作出不道德（甚至傷天害理）的事情。】👉🏻見利忘義
Hello from Seattle 😄
靓女的节目真好！谢谢你！❤
多謝你嘅鼓勵！
Hello YoLo how are you 😊. 说話流利 應該不用看稿 加上每次都做足功課…. 使到節目順利進行 值得稱赞👍👍👋👋👏👏🤝🤝💪💪🌹🌹🌹🌹❤️❤️❤️❤️🍷🍷🍷🍷🥂🥂🥂🥂cheers !
Thank you!
好多謝，增知識。
［賺到盡］！呢個商業方向唔單止係大企業，香港各行業都係行緊呢個方向，真係救命！
今後座空巴,多謝!
係囉，快 d 轉坐 919 啦
呢樣嘢就梗㗎啦，點子波音公司員工唔敢坐波音，直頭係全世界人民都係唔敢坐波音要坐c919啦，不過唯獨是某一個國家嘅主席就唔敢坐c919
品質逃脫 = 品質保障形同虛設 😂😂😂
good sharing
感謝Bonnie, 希望可以多講一點美國領導科技發展的各行各業歷史故事，以及最近的情況。❤🙏（為何黃助的名字沒有錢學森的出名？）
收到 👍至於點解王助冇錢學森咁出名，你睇埋王助呢集就會知啦😉📺
@@yologuy 多謝Bonnie, 我是Kurious 的年費會員🙏❤️D.W.
香港很多公司都係咁，出面請啲金融佬直接空降做CEO，對該行業係零經驗。請返來最大目的係如何推高股價，集資，借貸和cut cost。每年出30個月花紅，公司出事就立即辭職走人。可憐的下屬孭鑊被人告，公司倒閉員工失業。高層CEO已到下間上市公司又黎過。
Enjoy the programme
真係好癲，有無心做事，time will tell
Airbus都有好多問題你地行外人唔知姐，
btw商用飛機唔係得2間製造商
你講得啱，我會係上面作出更正！👍
死因可唔可以話係判上判上判上判?
謝謝❤❤
wish to hear more about Wang Tsoo
我曾經坐過A340,用法國CFM引擎，比勞斯來斯引擎静😅
That's why I'm afraid to fly because the majority of the airlines use Boeing airplanes.
支持廣東話youtube製作
坐C919吧
請說黄在的事, 謝謝
期待着知道一些黄助（？）
收到 👍王助
Now the saying is 'if it's Boeing I ain't going' 😂😂😂 who wants to risk of NOT arriving safely at your destiny?
其實商用飛機manufacturer唔只得Boeing同Airbus!
唔止兩間商用飛機製造商架，Boeing , Airbus 之外仲有例如 Bombardier, Embraer, etc.
但大型長途客機都係呢兩家獨大
多謝指出！👍 我會喺上面作出更正！
其實仲有中國商飛。波音公司嘅問題，其實中國商飛嘅工程師一早已經知道。
My god, 真係將人命較飛？
點都好過屍久一狗啦😂
商用飛機製造商全世界唔止兩間呀~
sounded like Chinese management style to manage Boeing without caring people's lives !! so sad!! :(
依家好鐘意SCRUM, 呢種砌積木遲早累死好多大企業~
習主席出國外訪都是乘坐國航747-400 飛機😆😆
737就撞毀多过食飯
@@Dhyk-e2u 如果多過食飯，你以後唔好去旅行🥰🥰
It is not surprising as President Xi 唔敢搭C919 飛機
I rode on a DC 10 in the 70 s , I really didn't know it was so risky 😢
掃逃質量^一掃質
想聽B737max的問題的視頻
聯合科技的行政制度是好有問題，只看錢，不看質素
即係好似叫阿仔唔好做自己嗰行一樣啫😅我自己好鍾意波音飛機
蓮粒 羅斯 size 都唔岩😂
great !!
其實還有什麼型號是安全飛？😮💨😮💨😮💨✈️✈️✈️✈️🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣
全球只有兩間飛機制造商，大量生產飛機難免也有大量失誤，也不容許第三間出現，競對手少了質素自然少了。
某程度上麥道既劣質文化污染左波音
唔好意思, 我係度想講兩句. 我唔知道你係咪波音內部既員工, 我自己曾經係Renton 737 MAX Final assembly 既Quality Engineer, 而家喺Seattle Delivery Center 做Flight Testing System Engineer. 如果你唔係波音或者前麥道既員工, 我諗我應該比你有資格去講以下嘅說話-你所講嘅同我每日同management, engineering team 同 flight line mechanics 既信念同認知都好唔一樣. 波音有160000嗰員工, 如果你問我對波音飛機既品質有冇信心, 我可以同你講我有信心. Manufacturing 全世界包括Airbus 等世界級工廠都只係喺3 Sigma既region. 6 Sigma 係冇人做到. Quality escape 係現實, 唔係廢話, Airbus Comac一樣有. 我係Renton Factory既時候親身 Gemba 佢哋既QA 係點樣做FOD check, 點樣 buy off NCR. 所以請唔好用「波音員工自己都唔敢坐」呢啲誤導性既title.
P.S. 如果你對737 MAX 既system design 包括同NG 有物分別既問題, 我唔介意話比你聽. 不過MAX 既墜毀係pilot error 同maintenance error. 波音原本設計嘅alpha vane冇system redundancy 係不智, 不過並非design error. 利申： FAA licensed Commercial pilot Instrument rated.
Jane 多謝你嘅回覆！其實，好難得有第一手 info 嘅人喺度分享內部人員嘅睇法！我好有興趣知多啲。
至於我片入面嘅資訊，我通常都會用幾個唔同嘅來源去核實，今次參考咗幾個比較 in-depth嘅紀錄片，包括PBS、Al Jazeera同Netflix嘅紀錄片。我真係想知你點睇PBS嗰個紀錄片32:49到35:40嗰段 (ua-cam.com/video/Z76YpCz9N2Y/v-deo.htmlsi=E4Eh3hFeGgU915vo)，AA 個機師逐行逐行睇 Ethiopia 嗰個機師做嘅嘢，結論係嗰個機師已經跟足波音出嘅指引去處理MCAS問題。好多受訪嘅機師都話飛機嘅整體設計冇大問題，最大嘅問題係波音高層為咗省錢，完全冇訓練機師用MCAS系統。而且他們也沒有意識到 MCAS over compensate，即使manual override 後也繼續重新 kick in。
不過點都好，真係多謝你嘅分享！
@@yologuy因為時間關係我並冇睇晒淨係睇咗你講嗰幾分鐘。大概31分鐘開始，內容都有講到我哋嘅QRH 係有Runaway Stab Trim 嘅指引。條片裏面亦都有講到，副駕駛正確地執行左Stab Trim Cut Out嘅步驟。問題係唔知點解佢哋唔減速，令到Manual Trimming 變得極度困難。解決嘅方法有兩個，第一個當然就係減速，然後先 Manual Trim, 第二個方法就係先啟動 Electric Trim，利用操縱桿上邊既Trim Switch trim 好左部飛機，然後先再執行cut out。問題係點解兩位飛機師都冇意識要減速？737 MAX 嘅超速提示（我地叫Clackers) 設定喺當速度超過346 knots 或者Mach 0.826 就會不停咁發出好似雀仔叫咁嘅聲音，提示飛機師飛機已經超速。其實呢啲一連串嘅錯誤喺極短嘅時間內piled up. 埃塞俄比亞航空呢單，當佢哋起飛嘅時候Stick Shaker就已經提示緊機師佢哋有unreliable AOA/ unreliable airspeed 嘅可能性，佢哋應該照住 unreliable airspeed memory item checklist 設定引擎輸出。如果佢哋第一步有做啱，後邊MCAS 係被cut off 嘅時候，佢哋就可以人手manual trim. 退一步講，就算佢哋冇做呢一步，聽到clackers超速提示嘅時候佢哋就應該減速。你架車壞咗迫力，你仲會唔會係咁踩油門？正常應該都唔會。 逝者為大，我唔係想踩多佢哋兩腳，不過我絕對同意我哋前任CEO Dennis所講，pilot error 係意外主因。
@@yologuy然後簡單回應一下你講MCAS嘅問題。第一，MCAS 並唔會overcompensate。MCAS不停既啟動係因為alpha vane 失靈。第二，機師對於Runaway Stab既QRH section 9.1 (亦即係你所指嘅對應指引）step 2 同3 並無被正確執行，自動油門從來都未被disengaged。更重要嘅係指引明明講咗要用electric trim好咗先cut out electric trim, 如果當時機組人員有咁做就唔會發生意外。喺你quote條片度，若果你認真睇，你就會發現佢直接跳到去Step 5 㩒 Cut Out. 喺我嘅角度，你quote 嗰條片係錯誤描述，或者話講一半唔講一半。波音一開始冇將MCAS說明擺喺FCOM 度係失策，但係其實飛機上有好多唔同嘅系統都係背景運作，機師並唔需要知道。例如 Landing Attitude Modifier，或者係Cabin Smoke Pseudo Removal Mode…etc。如果我夾硬要用一個例子，我會話例如自動波車，份Manual 都唔會話俾你聽自動波係點運作，但係唔知道自動波點運作並唔會另你忽然間唔識揸車。呢樣算係gray area。以機師既身分黎講，我自己就認為波音可以做好啲，但係MCAS 有冇係FCOM入面根本唔影響機師控制飛機。
有樣嘢你講啱。我認識既所有波音737 MAX機師，which exceeds a couple dozen，冇任何一位同我傾過偈嘅認為呢隻飛機係設計上唔安全。 我並唔係話咁好有代表性，一定會有機師唔同意737係一個安全嘅設計，不過我咁啱有737既system knowledge，所以我明白點解佢地對737有信心。
講咁多 technical
Term 同proof 都無用
現實就係成日出事
如果你講嘅野係啱
就係仲未搵出有無真正technical problem
可以係採購零件問題
咁己經唔關engineering
有無公司人 貪腐？
咁大企業 很難查
@@moliumusic 我唔知你講既「咁多問題」係咪單指波音。按AVherald統計, 波音同Airbus 既出事率/dispatchability 係接近一様。我唔講technical aspect既資料，咁有邊個可以講？ 歸類大多數既留言都係 「波音腐敗」，「利益行頭，波音比班MBA做管理, 冷落engineering」，「737 MAX 60年老設計不思進取」…etc. 博主自己都強調波音股價至上，導致質量下降。既然要討論，咁要有實際既理據。睇返上面依啲留言根本全部都係groundless claim. 推高股價就會必然導致質量下降，依個某程度上係邏輯謬誤，更加唔好講其他黑波音既留言就連邏輯冇。
單係講個結果，然後事後孔明邊個唔識？你唔熟悉嘅同時，但係又唔想人講technical details, 咁仲點討論？
對於黄座（？），所知甚少，也許是他留在了那个他成長的地方…、而為何钱学森那么出名，廣為人知，我想是因为他對於國家貢献巨大，他被美麗國驅逐出去時，帶走了大量的数据資料…、帮助了國家的某领域的研究及发展，似乎有点像這些年所謂的千人计划的最早期的构思吧😂，真的是历害了，我的國！
737 MAX? Never.
同APPLE做緊既野一樣
想知黃助
收到 👍
还有国産客机C919🎉
你先做白老鼠好冇？就算波音再唔掂,我都唔會搭C919
@wailam2713 我尊重你的选擇，时間許可搭船囉。👶🎉
@@wailam2713香港航線都開Q埋啦😂你考慮多十年先😂😂😂我坐左兩轉上海喇
@@shlwkhk 一路走好夾唔送🤣
America and Boeing should learn their lesson by outsource to India.
有中文字幕了😊🎉