@@Sotto_ Charles wants you to see who he is. He showed everybody in the opening ceremony of the commonwealth games but most people dont want to see it. This artist was obviously chosen because he uses masonic symbolism in his portraits of famous people. He wouldn't have been chosen without them knowing who he is and how he works.
The use of a Monarch butteryfly over the right shoulder seems a bit 5th grade-ish. The rest of it just looks like a head floating in a pool of blood. Gruesome at best.
There was literally no point in the way J. Yeo painted the King. I’m not British and I know King Charles wasn’t the best with Diana but the way he was portrayed here was just abysmal.
Why would you take artistic liberties, especially in this way, of the King or any Monarch for that matter? What is wrong with you? You paint the King properly or step aside and let a truly artistic artist take the role. He needs a Regal Royal Portrait. You can always paint how you do with your other work at a nother time. If your intentions weren't meant for the work you were tasked to do, then you shouldn't be painting at all.
I've looked at other works by Mr. Yeo, and his other portraits seem much more balanced. He has done beautiful portraits of Prince Philip and the former Duchess of Cornwall, Her Majesty Queen Camilla. He also used this same style for other figures he has painted, including his own father, but those portraits use different tones and have better definition and contrast. I think the red in this portrait is totally overwhelming and detracts from the subject. It makes a statement, but generally not a positive one. And although the red has a slightly pink tone to it, it still illicits too much of a connection to imagery of fire and blood. Those are not kind symbols to be associated with a King, especially King Charles. It has prompted unjustified vile remarks against the King. Surely the artist wasn't oblivious to how this would be received, which really makes you question his intent, no matter how he tries to justify it.
Find out what he is involved in and you will change your mind. He wants to enslave you and change your way of life dramatically that’s if you survive he is a member of the world economic foreign wake up please.
That is your interpretation of red... Red also means and symbolises many other positive and beautiful things, such as abundance, love, passion, character, energy, strength, security, warmth. Let's be more open minded, art give us that possibility ❣
@@christinesbetterknitting4533 ohhhh what does it say because I see exactly what I wrote??? I think I may have been invaded here because of all the comments I leave on MM&H
First time I saw this picture I thaught it was a joke. I'm sorry, but for me it seems like the King is in bloud or fire. What will people think about this picture in 100, 200, 500 years, maybe after a bloudy/fire-full war?
If you have paid, get a refund... , delete this and sit before a proper artist representing you at this time of your life , in positiveness ..Not some one who wants to be artistic about you in the most bizzare ways ....,this is not the time such a morbid picture should be released especially when the royal family is struck by so much illness....
The King should have been painted wearing The Garter Robes or a miitary uniform. Very poor representation of His Majesty. Red on red? Seriously?? The "artist" needs to go back to school.
Don't like anything that requires an explanation. And it's supposed to be a portrait not a life story, should have gone with the same guy who did William and Katherine
It's an interesting portrait and the likeness is wonderful, but His Majesty King Charles III emerging from a wall of blood is difficult not to see when you look at it.
Was a photograph airbrushed? The hidden picture looks very similar to a photograph of the king wearing his reds. In this monstrosity I see a painter with a very negative story he's trying to tell. I've had 6 year olds draw a better picture of a butterfly than this is. I feel sorry for His Majesty. What's he going to do with this horror?
I don’t think it was a compliment. It would be interesting to know how that artist was contracted. Yeo was delighted at watching King Charles squirm uncomfortably.
Art doesnt have to be stereotypically beautiful.... he's portrayed something. You have to admit the skill of the artist in the detail of the face, all art is an expression, too many people are seeing it initially and hating it as opposed to feeling....
Have you seen what happens if you put this picture upside down with the kings head at the bottom. Then mirror it from the right hand side..... The evil will be revealed.
Why did King Charles allow himself and his country to be shamed like this! When so many are facing trying times and quite rightly afraid for their future.
Es demasiado intenso, recibo un mensaje negativo, respetando al artista y su obra. Me parece un retrato fuerte, me hace pensar que destaca malas decisiones del rey, sufrimiento, sumido en un infierno de sufrimientos. No consigo ver ese cuadro X segunda vez.
I actually like it. I'm Irish btw and not a British Royal Family aficionado, nor have any great interest in more impressionistic/'creative' art. I think this portrait is striking and the overall design is clever and very well executed.
@@marieross it is you who do not understand or aware of what goes behind closed doors of elites in what they are doing. It made me sad to say this truth out. Many paedophiles artists are commissioned to paint for the elites too and those you are not going to see it in UA-cam. You think it is mean, but it is actually simply factual but they are not showing you that.
@@deeboo9978 i graduated in an art school in architecture with great friends knowing exactly what’s going on, by sharing you one fact, you accuse me of this? Hahahah… 🤣😂 if you are elite enough to be invited to their ceremonies, then you will know I am not slandering. There are proper rituals with blood 🩸 this is what our King Charles likes to be portrayed. As simple as that. At least you can Google again the satanic ceremony in the las t Commonwealth Games in Birmingham, that Bull of Baal is still in a train station in Birmingham. Then you can also Google the worship of Shiva in NASA or Satan ceremonies for the opening ceremony of the European tunnels in Switzerland. 🇨🇭 they have the satanic Goat worshipping there too. Human as slaves in worshipping Satan in the form of a goat. You can wait and see if there will be a real Princess Kate and her children ever come out alive and well again too. I have nothing to gain here but only sadness for the Late Queen.
Mr. Yeo, your painting is marvelous. If you like it, no one else's opinion is important or right. Thank God we live where everyone can comment about how they feel when observing a work of art. Frankly, Picasso does nothing for me, but I recognize his artistic genius and liked his works done when he was very young.
No the artist isn't "an antimonarchist". If you had listened to the artist, he said he started painting the portrait when Charles was the Prince of Wales (red is the most significant colour of Wales). He became Kind half way through him painting it.
@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz Then why on earth continue with all of the red? He should have chosen a more regal background. I notice the artist dressed himself in regal purple for the unveiling. That was by no mistake. 🙄 Some artists think far too highly of themselves and they try too hard to be controversial at any cost. It doesn't resonate well with people, especially for a formal portrait.
@@richardwait1206 I suppose art is subjective. To most it looks like an anti royalist joke, it makes him look covered in the blood of his sins and demonic.
I love it! It looks epic, like an Arthurian legend coming out of the mists. Honestly, what do people want, every portrait to just be King Charles standing there in a suit or King Charles standing here in a uniform? He can have a photo taken for that. It's art people, lighten up. The face is perfect btw - and the rest keeps it interesting.
Actually I agree. I really did like his face It was definitely the King. The face is kind, generous , caring, honest. The red is certainly growing on me. 🇦🇺🦘🐨💐❤️
He is throwing a bunch of useless word salad. Doesn't explain why he made this very creepy painting. Totally upsets my stomach. I am not religious at all, but this is making me feel something. There is a bad spirit over there. There is something demonic behind all this and it's almost like they are tired of hiding. They should have just cut the BS and reveal everything. What difference will it make now? The world already knows and they have took the initiative to tell the world in a not-so-subtle way.
Years ago my Mother in law threw an annual Halloween party. They were fun. Every year she would have a different special event or game. One year she hired an "aura reader" He took like a Polaroid pic of each of us and on most you could see a faint delicate color around the person. Like a rainbow or pale blue etc. Mine had this massive red cloud around me. It looked like a fat bright blood red feather boa around me. My heart and stomach just dropped and I froze when I saw it. I didn't like or enjoy that at all. It really distressed me a lot.
@tsmith9078 Well, I was spending the evening with my Mother in Law. Lol. I don't think this aura reader was legit anyway. But it Freaked me out a bit, nobody else's picture turned out like mine. Mine looked like rage.
This is his portrait, already revealed by King Charles himself who understands how art can differ. The King is not bothered, so anyone else's dismay doesn't matter.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Looks like it was made by a serial killer
I think it's the perfect portrait for King Tampax.
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
@@No_free_speech_in_YT_regime lolll
@@No_free_speech_in_YT_regime That's right! He wanted to be Camilla's tampon! Ew!
The only thing in my mind when I saw it was blood. He’s covered in blood with a blood soaked wall behind him.
Have another cup of coffee and look up. Wow You are seriously out there. Jeez.
how very apt
He’s the foretold Antichrist of Biblical prophecy so yes, it’s probably very purposeful. Look up ”Antichrist and a Cup of Tea” by Tim Cohen. God bless
That red is not the color of blood. You are reaching to see what you can criticize.
Yep, blood of innocents.
These Satanists not trying to hide at all anymore
If you mean the painter, that's hard to argue. Why else paint something like this?
If a child painted it, they would get sent to a psychologist.
It tells us what is to come. It makes me step back, feeling blatant evil in our face.
Be watchful. 😮
Maybe the artist is showing the world who king Charles is....maybe he's a cheeky feller 😏
@@Sotto_ Charles wants you to see who he is. He showed everybody in the opening ceremony of the commonwealth games but most people dont want to see it. This artist was obviously chosen because he uses masonic symbolism in his portraits of famous people. He wouldn't have been chosen without them knowing who he is and how he works.
@@holyglitch1126 Look at his portraits of other famous people. Charles knew.
So you want to tell everyone why you put Baphamet, one- eyed symbol, demons, and monarch butterfly programming in this portrait?
Nostradamus predicted that prince chuck here would be the ruin to the royal 'empire'
Can someone explain the symbology of the butterfly please?
@@DianaEversolereally?
Butterfly in occult means demon possession and mind control @@CosmicSeeker69
@@CosmicSeeker69monarch programming
If a child painted that, the parents would be concerned.
😂😂😂
Why make the color red over the whole painting? Its one of the most terrible paintings ive ever seem. Especially one for a royal
Jews have a thing for "Red".
Jews
@@isolinear9836 nailed it!
@@RabbiPorkchopracists like you.
It's supposed to represent blood
The use of a Monarch butteryfly over the right shoulder seems a bit 5th grade-ish. The rest of it just looks like a head floating in a pool of blood. Gruesome at best.
😂👍
Apparently King Charles requested the monarch butterfly to be in the painting
Monarch butterflies are used and known for occult practices.
Butterfly is a clue that there is a butterfly image.
Yeah... look up the Monarch project. The butterfly is used in mind control experiments as a metaphor for transformation into a split personality.
Awful. Sorry
There was literally no point in the way J. Yeo painted the King. I’m not British and I know King Charles wasn’t the best with Diana but the way he was portrayed here was just abysmal.
For such a well painted face, the rest is like 'what?'
i love it, its memorable and will easily stand out in a room.
Satanic
@@awake1000 The color red has many meanings. I see it as a power piece.
Even the face is showing you who he really is.
@@official2mt37 It certainly will. 😬
It looks like he's portrayed as satan!
BINGO
S.a.t.a.n.s little helper
Antichrist
That for sure.
He is the anti christ and he will be the one who sit in the temple and claim to be God
So much BS excuses for painting a horrible painting.
Don't like the truth when you see it then?
So explain why you did this atrocity!
They paid for that???
No we paid. The British taxpayer.
We paid for that monstrosity
We most probably paid for it.🤮🤮🤮
I don’t care for this don’t like it
Not everyone? Don't make me laugh, it's universally bad. How could they even approve this...
Why would you take artistic liberties, especially in this way, of the King or any Monarch for that matter? What is wrong with you? You paint the King properly or step aside and let a truly artistic artist take the role. He needs a Regal Royal Portrait. You can always paint how you do with your other work at a nother time. If your intentions weren't meant for the work you were tasked to do, then you shouldn't be painting at all.
Somebody say ____it get paint so on purpose
A blood soaked portrait is completely appropriate for Savile's best friend.
I agree 💯% Definitely not a Painter, accustomed to painting portraits 🙈
Portrayed him perfectly. All the right symbolism there for you to figure out who he really is.
Beautifully see it and absolutely correct
I don't not like it. It gives me the chills.
Mission accomplished, then.💀
It’s a mirror image. Look it up.
Demonic
Then do yourself a favor and never look at a Brekzenski painting haha
@@Arginnemirror and reflection
My Dog Saw it on The News & Was Scared of it, He Ran away then barked at it, He Never does That...! 😔
Dogs just know.
Widziałam dwa razy diabła, więc się nie dziwię
If an animal backs away from something you know it's evil.
😂
He is the AntiChrist. It explains who he really is. Yes, your dog is smart for not liking him.
Its a great anti-monarch piece. Not sure how he got away with convincing anyone otherwise
Exactly. How on Earth did the get approved by the team of media advisors. Absolutly Satanic, no doubt.
I've looked at other works by Mr. Yeo, and his other portraits seem much more balanced.
He has done beautiful portraits of Prince Philip and the former Duchess of Cornwall, Her Majesty Queen Camilla.
He also used this same style for other figures he has painted, including his own father, but those portraits use different tones and have better definition and contrast.
I think the red in this portrait is totally overwhelming and detracts from the subject.
It makes a statement, but generally not a positive one.
And although the red has a slightly pink tone to it, it still illicits too much of a connection to imagery of fire and blood. Those are not kind symbols to be associated with a King, especially King Charles.
It has prompted unjustified vile remarks against the King.
Surely the artist wasn't oblivious to how this would be received, which really makes you question his intent, no matter how he tries to justify it.
Well written. I said Fire!
Yes well said
Find out what he is involved in and you will change your mind. He wants to enslave you and change your way of life dramatically that’s if you survive he is a member of the world economic foreign wake up please.
Marxists Wipeout of the regal sovereign uniform.
😊
Promotion for Carrie 2 ?? Face is great red is horrible, bloodbath springs to mind
That is your interpretation of red... Red also means and symbolises many other positive and beautiful things, such as abundance,
love, passion, character, energy, strength, security, warmth. Let's be more open minded, art give us that possibility ❣
Wrong color of red for blood.
@@christinesbetterknitting4533Not when it's art... it can symbolise thus it represents.
@anacatalinalopezlutz3143
King Charles III is none of those things.
@@StarTzarina That's your perception. I have a different perception of the King, my own is positive.
Looks like a form of devil worship from a Hammer House of Horror! Wonder how much it cost?
£8 million.
No disrespect to King Charles, but. HE WAS ROBBED.! I suppose that means no OBE for me.
@trevorbrassey1651
🎖️ Awwwww 😤
@@trevorbrassey1651more like the taxpayers were robbed
Indeed! What mugs we are!
Well he sealed his fate of ever painting another portrait for anyone else lol
You got auto-corrected and you didn't leave the comment you meant to leave.
@@christinesbetterknitting4533 ohhhh what does it say because I see exactly what I wrote??? I think I may have been invaded here because of all the comments I leave on MM&H
You said he sealed his fate of ever painting another portrait for anyone else, and you are sooo RIGHT, !!!
I like the face rendering, but not enough contrast or detail in the remainder 98% of the painting.
First time I saw this picture I thaught it was a joke.
I'm sorry, but for me it seems like the King is in bloud or fire.
What will people think about this picture in 100, 200, 500 years, maybe after a bloudy/fire-full war?
Charles was the Prince of Wales when the artist started to paint it. Red is the significant colour of Wales.
The first thing I thought when I read your comment was "Why did this commenter mis-spell "blood?"
You won't be here.
@@christinesbetterknitting4533it is called typo love
What people who know the history of the family think of his ancestors now.
The excessive red ruins it! 🫤
Agreed.
Doesn't red stand for communism ?
He could have put different shades of red
@@A-Grammie-On-the-ROCK red stands for a 100 different things
I mean no disrespect here but the painting is reminiscent of an Evil Dead movie poster. Sorry.
Satan himself 😮
Netanyahu first then him 👹
Terrible modern art as usual, so disappointing.
Away with the secret cult monarchy
Most disturbing
All the bloodshed of the Royal Family symbolised in one painting.
If you have paid, get a refund... , delete this and sit before a proper artist representing you at this time of your life , in positiveness ..Not some one who wants to be artistic about you in the most bizzare ways ....,this is not the time such a morbid picture should be released especially when the royal family is struck by so much illness....
This is utterly repulsive and disgusting. His Majesty should burn it. Its utterly terrible. I wonder if it is some kind of joke. Ghastly.
There is no illness. They were arrested.
I agree with you there.
Make sure the next artist is not Marxist, Communist or Socialist. Just a normal artist appreciative of the money and acknowledgment.
It’s horrible.
It looks like Satan - the red background ruins the portrait
and butterfly ( monarch programming)
The King should have been painted wearing The Garter Robes or a miitary uniform.
Very poor representation of His Majesty. Red on red?
Seriously?? The "artist" needs to go back to school.
Don't like anything that requires an explanation. And it's supposed to be a portrait not a life story, should have gone with the same guy who did William and Katherine
It's absolutely horrendous and should never be seen again. Doesn't someone look at these things before they are unveiled?
It's an interesting portrait and the likeness is wonderful, but His Majesty King Charles III emerging from a wall of blood is difficult not to see when you look at it.
Its nothing like blood.
Blood of Dianna
King of what?
The back ground should have been blue and yellow complimenting his red uniform. His face is marvelous.
His face is stunning.
Jonathan Yeo, troll of the year 😂
Marxist of the month...
Why is it. That the worse the art, nowadays the artist cannot do without a lot of text to explain what the eye does not appreciate😊?
Художник это наивысшее проявление оптимизма!!! НаВерное Очень Грустно Жить в Мире, в котором Приходится Обьяснять Банальные Вещи Всем Подряд.)))
@@СветланаЧерняк-ц2дBanal is only one of the right words here😊
Hellfire.
🔥🔥🔥
Was a photograph airbrushed? The hidden picture looks very similar to a photograph of the king wearing his reds. In this monstrosity I see a painter with a very negative story he's trying to tell. I've had 6 year olds draw a better picture of a butterfly than this is. I feel sorry for His Majesty. What's he going to do with this horror?
It's a no for me
I don’t think it was a compliment. It would be interesting to know how that artist was contracted. Yeo was delighted at watching King Charles squirm uncomfortably.
Revolting portrait
Hes burning... on fire... wierd .
Sack this 'artist'
Placing 2 portraits side by side but in reverse reveals the baphomet image which isn’t surprising in the slightest
Art doesnt have to be stereotypically beautiful.... he's portrayed something. You have to admit the skill of the artist in the detail of the face, all art is an expression, too many people are seeing it initially and hating it as opposed to feeling....
This isn’t just a difference you can explain away. It’s not a portrait. I’m not sure what to call the great mess on the canvas.
I thought it was a joke...turns out the painting is actually real and horrendous....and Charles deserves it.
Not good
The fact that this is in stereo is diabolical in itself
He captured the face of the King remarkably well.
Not sure why the rest was chosen 🤔
"King"
So they saw this finished product, and said ‘sure, that works’? This is awful
It shows his evilness. They dont even try to hide it.
Is this some kind of accusation about imperialism and the blood on the hands of empire? I really feel like it is.
Lazy work is what this is.
Have you seen what happens if you put this picture upside down with the kings head at the bottom. Then mirror it from the right hand side..... The evil will be revealed.
The excessive use of red depicts the pure colonization massacre
Take the L
True.
Why did King Charles allow himself and his country to be shamed like this!
When so many are facing trying times and quite rightly afraid for their future.
Es demasiado intenso, recibo un mensaje negativo, respetando al artista y su obra. Me parece un retrato fuerte, me hace pensar que destaca malas decisiones del rey, sufrimiento, sumido en un infierno de sufrimientos. No consigo ver ese cuadro X segunda vez.
Evil
It just makes me think of bloodshed and war. Doesn't fit the King's persona at all.
Quite fitting actually!
Please review the color of blood. This is not it.
Horrific! What was the point of this? What a waste of time and money.
I actually like it. I'm Irish btw and not a British Royal Family aficionado, nor have any great interest in more impressionistic/'creative' art. I think this portrait is striking and the overall design is clever and very well executed.
Looks like the walk to Purgatory….
Not everyone?! You mean absolutely no one😂 it's awful. Looks like "the portrait of Dorian Grey" 😂 at the end of the book 😮
That's why I like it.
Like his face floating within the fireplace smiling at you.
Art as beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I would have liked to see King Charles more clearly. My opinion.
He’s gone demonic long time already…
@@lucialindeboom1382petty mean comment
@@lucialindeboom1382
If that’s what you see then that’s what’s within you. It’s your eyes that seeing it, pieces of art are your interpretation.
@@marieross it is you who do not understand or aware of what goes behind closed doors of elites in what they are doing. It made me sad to say this truth out. Many paedophiles artists are commissioned to paint for the elites too and those you are not going to see it in UA-cam. You think it is mean, but it is actually simply factual but they are not showing you that.
@@deeboo9978 i graduated in an art school in architecture with great friends knowing exactly what’s going on, by sharing you one fact, you accuse me of this? Hahahah… 🤣😂 if you are elite enough to be invited to their ceremonies, then you will know I am not slandering. There are proper rituals with blood 🩸 this is what our King Charles likes to be portrayed. As simple as that.
At least you can Google again the satanic ceremony in the las t Commonwealth Games in Birmingham, that Bull of Baal is still in a train station in Birmingham. Then you can also Google the worship of Shiva in NASA or Satan ceremonies for the opening ceremony of the European tunnels in Switzerland. 🇨🇭 they have the satanic Goat worshipping there too. Human as slaves in worshipping Satan in the form of a goat. You can wait and see if there will be a real Princess Kate and her children ever come out alive and well again too. I have nothing to gain here but only sadness for the Late Queen.
Mr. Yeo, your painting is marvelous. If you like it, no one else's opinion is important or right. Thank God we live where everyone can comment about how they feel when observing a work of art. Frankly, Picasso does nothing for me, but I recognize his artistic genius and liked his works done when he was very young.
It's so bad I'm starting to think the artist is an antimonarchist
No the artist isn't "an antimonarchist". If you had listened to the artist, he said he started painting the portrait when Charles was the Prince of Wales (red is the most significant colour of Wales). He became Kind half way through him painting it.
@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz
Then why on earth continue with all of the red? He should have chosen a more regal background.
I notice the artist dressed himself in regal purple for the unveiling. That was by no mistake. 🙄
Some artists think far too highly of themselves and they try too hard to be controversial at any cost. It doesn't resonate well with people, especially for a formal portrait.
@@Sotto_
Only the artist can answer that question.
@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz
And so he should.
Don’t worry about criticism this is a wonderful work of art and credit to you for producing a modern & absolutely genuine work. Love it.
What do you love about it exactly?
@@silver4831 as it states above. Modern & genuine work of art.a breath of fresh air from the traditional portraits of RF
@@richardwait1206 I suppose art is subjective. To most it looks like an anti royalist joke, it makes him look covered in the blood of his sins and demonic.
Royal blood bath
The portrait suits the king very well
That portrait is scary 😨
That portrait is freaking scary. Awful. The hands look like scaly talons
Horrible.
I’m telling my children this is the roman emperor Nero
I love it! It looks epic, like an Arthurian legend coming out of the mists. Honestly, what do people want, every portrait to just be King Charles standing there in a suit or King Charles standing here in a uniform? He can have a photo taken for that. It's art people, lighten up. The face is perfect btw - and the rest keeps it interesting.
Mordred more like.
His face is spectacularly done. The rest is starting to grow on me.
Actually I agree. I really did like his face It was definitely the King. The face is kind, generous , caring, honest. The red is certainly growing on me. 🇦🇺🦘🐨💐❤️
His face is embellished
@@hannas-e343
Embellished? It's a painting!
David Ike was right all along!
Draco....
Charles III: Revelling in his Satanism.
That the interpretation of an artist not the king that thinking knows better but even a student could have done better 😅😅😅
People are certainly devided thats for sure.
I’ve yet to see a single positive remark. So NO, No one is “devided”.
@@LaDivinaLover I've seen loads of comments from people who like it........ You're wrong, look around.
What was he even thinking?
Its hideous
He is throwing a bunch of useless word salad. Doesn't explain why he made this very creepy painting. Totally upsets my stomach. I am not religious at all, but this is making me feel something. There is a bad spirit over there. There is something demonic behind all this and it's almost like they are tired of hiding. They should have just cut the BS and reveal everything. What difference will it make now? The world already knows and they have took the initiative to tell the world in a not-so-subtle way.
......................................................
Unless that is the painting of his aura? It's a Hellish look to it was this intentional?
Years ago my Mother in law threw an annual Halloween party. They were fun. Every year she would have a different special event or game. One year she hired an "aura reader" He took like a Polaroid pic of each of us and on most you could see a faint delicate color around the person. Like a rainbow or pale blue etc. Mine had this massive red cloud around me. It looked like a fat bright blood red feather boa around me. My heart and stomach just dropped and I froze when I saw it. I didn't like or enjoy that at all. It really distressed me a lot.
@@lisascorp Red in the aura shows anger or being upset, its a ring around the body about 1cm not like this disgusting thing.
@tsmith9078 Well, I was spending the evening with my Mother in Law. Lol.
I don't think this aura reader was legit anyway. But it Freaked me out a bit, nobody else's picture turned out like mine. Mine looked like rage.
Looks like King Charles is ready for a battle
BLOOD🩸 IN HIS HANDS.
(Rest in peace, Princess Diana💐)
Feels like the painter wanted to paint for himself
Just change the background, king's body gets lost and it's disrespectful.
This is his portrait, already revealed by King Charles himself who understands how art can differ. The King is not bothered, so anyone else's dismay doesn't matter.
Red roses everywhere!
I love it! It looks epic, like an Arthurian legend coming out of the mists.
Evilllllllllllll and they are not hiding it anymore
People may say genius but I see the red as prominent before the king.
I like it. Something unexpected but very interesting
It’s horrible. Hire someone else to do it another one!!!
He's horrible, so it doesn't need to be repainted.
Beautiful, exactly what all countries under British empire were thinking