The fact that Cassidy is the one that controls the head and Crying Child controls the body could explain why Golden Freddy’s jumpscare is just his head. That’s the only hostile part of him. Up until UCN, when Crying Child is put to rest, and only Cassidy remains. That could also explain why the jumpscare is a fully animated Fredbear
also explains gf just slouching in the floor rather than standing up, as his body may be controled by a spirit that already moved on, thanks to the puppet and the happiest day minigame
@@CouchCactus Maybe it's something he was asked not to mention or he felt others should discover for themselves since he was able to see many of the props in person and had a lot of meta knowledge about the movie?
@@homerman76 Matpat was at the set in very early production so it's likely that this set wasn't made/was in the process of being made when he went for his recording.
I love this theory so much. The whole “flip the happiest day and it becomes the bite” was soooo good. But the glued face on golden Freddy kid was incredible!
I also want to bring attention to the fact that golden Freddy’s jump scares have always been just the head, which lines up with the vengeful spirit being the head since the body is not vengeful
Except, notably, UCN! There and in no other games Golden Freddy can do a full-body jumpscare when you deathcoin him, and if you consider that at this point CC should have moved on and been laid to rest, that only strengthens the theory, because that would leave only Cassidy still in control of Golden Freddy, and therefore able to attack with his full presence!
I LOVE the clue that blond kid's face is glued on top of another kid's face in the movies. Its such a small, hard to notice detail, but says so much. I've never seen it until now
I watched the movie with my younger sister because she liked FNAF, I wasn't into it, but I noticed it and it freaked me out lol now I'm a FNAF head lol
That's also why its always Golden Freddy's head as the jumpscare whereas the body is lifeless and doesn't move, the crying child doesn't want to be aggressive and doesn't move whereas cassidy attacks as a floating head
Maybe that could be an explanation of the Golden Freddy jumpscare crashing your game, it's CC trying to protect us, it's the only jumpscare in the games where it doesn't result in a bloody game over screen
The more I learn about FNAF lore, the more I admire Scott's ways of creating such a complex story, so much so that even the first game is still relevant even a decade after its release.
I'm pretty sure Scott made this accidentally, hence all the plot holes throughout the games. I like Scott and his games, but I'm not going to lie and say everything made sense, because it doesn't, which is explains why there are various of theories of the same thing.
@@DarthTrooper2021If you think about it his extremely avoidant way of telling the story would be quite beneficial in covering any plot holes, weird leaps of logic or retcons that might exist in the story. There's a lot to be said about the way FNAF does storytelling but it's hard to deny that it works for it!
@@DarthTrooper2021 I always felt like Scott, after failing at his previous games, just kinda let the fans speak and took their ideas and theories for FNAF. He’s got the best strategy of just letting the fans create the story/theories for him. If anything the fans should be thanking themselves.
@@MrAmbition774 I know this is a month later, but thank you. I'm not the only one who sees this. It was the community who made FNAF what it is, Scott just built the foundation for it. He made the game, we made the story.
Let’s not forget in the movie Abby literally changes the drawing of spring Bonnie holding hands with the MCI into what actually happened (spring Bonnie holding a knife over the dead bodies of the MCI) and only then do the animatronics close in on Afton
@@uglebeffus it would be funny if he just drew with his nondominant hand in a fist formation just to draw as childlike as possible to gaslight the animatronics better
@@ender01o66 This likely was their first time seeing this as it also was my first time learning this. May not have been John who found it but they likely learned this from this video.
@@tristanjohn1733 The hidden details in the movie and the story around Golden Freddy are insane. I would’ve never noticed this despite having seen the movie multiple times, this is actually next level storytelling😭
Someone using the movie for a theory is so exciting!! It seems like everyone was so quick to brush it to the side from a theory perspective, but I think there’s so much in there that could help us with the lore (like the cut-out picture you shared here). So neat!
Yeah, I think that the movie also gave us a clue on what happened to Susie’s dead dog from FFPS (It possessed Chica’s cupcake, who acts like a dog throughout the film)
So, all the way back in the days of fnaf 2, if someone went "hey why does the full body of golden freddy show up but only the head flies at you in the jumpscare?" They were actually really onto something! (or at least retconned to be)
All those people are finally getting their "Called it!" hype moment 10 years later hahahaha. Just wanted to add on and say that's not what a retcon is, it would just be considered an elaboration/explanation. Retcon is when you change something already implied or established. Some people believe Charlie's gender was a retcon due to the old minigames saying "Save Him".
Even though most of this is still stuff a majority of the fandom probably already knows, John does such a great job explaining it and wrapping it in a neat bow. Something even Game Theory struggled to do sometimes. Great video, man. Keep it up.
You'd be surprised, a lot of people seem to have been unaware about the blond kid's head being placed over the 5th MCI kid's head. Garrett was also said to not be in the MCI by Vanessa, so it shouldn't be him either.
@@omeletttteWhen it concerns the amount of clear clues talking about Golden Freddy, the established theory _is_ the simplest one. Doesn't mean it's not convoluted, but the alternate theories that have been going around have to bend the evidence quite a bit to make their perspectives work, ultimately being more convoluted than the established theory. That's not to say the take was bad by any means, but I do think it ultimately made some sacrifices to evidence for the sake of supporting itself.
The fact that the only part glued on top of the other kid’s drawing is just the head is a great supporting detail to your theory about how Cassidy is the one in control of the head of Golden Freddy.
16:10 I like how the blonde kid (presumably Cassidy)’s head is glued on top of (presumably garrets)’s body. How Crying child cannot see and is the body, but Cassidy is the head using golden Freddy’s body
Dude that glued face is such a crazy find. I think you might have just found either one of the biggest hints towards something I've ever seen or a production error
Oh for goodness sake did Scott really take the weird choice of making Golden Freddy's Jumpscare just his head flying at you and make it diegetic? Because this convoluted plot detail really does seem to solely exist to explain that design choice lol.
that's probably like half the "story" atp scott does something without thinking much about it, fans are delusional and try and fit it into lore and then scott decides to add it because he can't write very well
@@MistyWatersss It's more likely: Scott (Like Hussie) drops a bunch of possible Plot Hooks, and works them in later to have it Connect Back. FNAF 2 is LITERALLY this
Honestly, this is the most relevant, coherent and possibly true theory I've seen in a while We already thought about the two spirit situation, but now I'm 100% sure it's THESE specific ones Also, at the part with the drawing from the movie, I legit had a jawdrop, because I didn't realise til now that the Golden Freddy kid has another face glued on...
18:17 Into the Pit didn’t change much about Golden Freddy other than basically confirming that the Fazbear Frights novels are NOT canon to the games. The biggest reason why is because the missing children were not missing. In fact it was clearly VERY well known that they were dead. Also, they died in a party room which is just not how it goes in the games.
>The biggest reason why is because the missing children were not missing. In fact it was clearly VERY well known that they were dead. Also, they died in a party room which is just not how it goes in the games. To be fair, this COULD easily be explained by "It's weird Imprint Shit/not the actual events", the exact same way that there nothing *human* inside the suit, and instead there's just some sort of organic toothy flesh monster. More notably: It's not the FNAF 1 Layout (or similar) Inside OR Outside the Pit, and the Saferooms have already been Sealed.
The fact that the Fazbear Frights novels are confirmed as non-canon solidifies the theory that the Stitchwraith is nothing more than an example/representation of how Golden Freddy works!!
@@higueraft571 it also wouldn’t make sense to be canon too bc we see Garrets plane and we know the movie isn’t canon and also Vanny’s mask which also doesn’t make sense. Tho I do feel there are some little things that give us hints to the lore this game just ain’t part of the continuity
The ballpit is not time travel. The reason the Missing Children were found in the game is because the ballpit is not a time machine, but a memory pit. A ton of stuff that happens is inaccurate because it's based on distorted memories, and the Frights epilogues literally confirm this.
@@gamesuarx I know it’s an inaccurate memory, but the layout of Jeff’s Pizza is the exact same as the one for Freddy’s. And the party room is still there. So I don’t think that really works in this case.
This makes perfect sense. Afton killed a kid and tried to use his remnant to revive the crying child in golden freddy's body, but instead both souls are in the body. Another slam DUNK from my boi
@@ender01o66Yeah, this is speculation from the Dual Process theory video and I believe does have some questionable interpretations in the evidence used to support it. I feel like the answer might still just be as simple as "CC possessed Golden Freddy because he died to it".
@@yfrit_gg >I feel like the answer might still just be as simple as "CC possessed Golden Freddy because he died to it". Pretty much this yeah. The "trying to revive his kids" idea i've never really felt fits William OR what we've seen.
I agree with this and also like the connection rye toast drew that Cassidy is so vengeful because William spring locked him. That would explain a lot of the releations between golden Freddy and drowning in red lakes. In the silver eyes William says getting spring locked causes you to drowned in your own blood and the book calls out he is remembering something
"I agree with this and also like the connection rye toast drew that Cassidy is so vengeful because William spring locked him." Her* They also have the Crying Child's memories, so they've experienced the same torment he has, which would make anyone vengeful. "That would explain a lot of the releations between golden Freddy and drowning in red lakes." There's also the red lake in RUIN. This red lake represents the blood from the victims this Remnant came from. It's the same case with the ball pit in ITP.
@@ender01o66 >They also have the Crying Child's memories Not Necessarily? They'd be able to Communicate, but i dont think they instinctively have Shared Awareness... As far as i know there's 0 evidence for this at all. >so they've experienced the same torment he has, which would make anyone vengeful. To the wrong person though, in an entirely unrelated situation??? Cassidy is Vengeful because not only was she murdered by William in the MCI, but she got one of THE most Brutal/Gruesome deaths possible, then was worn around for ANOTHER killing spree, helpless to stop him, after she died.
@@higueraft571 1. You've never heard of ShatterVictim/equivalent? 2. Imagine using Tik Tok theories as if they're factual evidence. Please, don't do that in a response if you want it to be taken seriously.
I recomend that you look up my method of getting the crying child's name. Wolfies method is to match up cc's answers with cassidy's questions in the survival logbook. While the last answer "I'm scared" is a bit off it might match with the question of "Do you have dreams?" which is on page 41. Now you have the word "Evad". But there is a mirror next to the wordsearch reading "What do you see?" which might suggest by flipping the word "Evad" backwords to "Dave". It is also worth noting that in every night you have to take a moment and self-reflect, hence why Evad becomes Dave. The Dave name has also been present before inside the FNaF books which feels like the name Dave might be onto something....
@@enmadaniaisabel1552 >MICHAEL IS THE CC His ass is absolutely not. CC Objectively Died in a Hospital. And if CC *somehow* didnt die in a Hospital, he would NOT be old enough to work at a Fazbear location in 1987 (especially if he's like 8-10 in 1983, that'd put him at most at 14). >(AKA PHONE GUY) Not only dumb, now canonically proven wrong. (Phone Guy is clearly an adult by 1985, meanwhile Michael/Foxybro is likely 14 or so in 83, meaning he ALSO is not a legal adult by the time Phone Guy is recording the MCI Tapes, someone who is clearly an adult)
@@higueraft571 Also FNAF 3 implies Phone Guy worked at safety instructions on Fredbear Diner, which means he was already an adult by 1983 to not only work there but also be responsible for the springlocks
@@arealhumanbean3058 >on Fredbear Diner Considering these messages HEAVILY imply that this is just prior to the MCI (springbonnie moved, soon followed by the saferoom sealing), it's likely this was the FNAF 1 location, not Fredbear's (which was almost certainly closed by 1985)
I was skeptical about the "2 spirits 1 freddy" theory, but this video finally convinced me. Very well explained, everything makes sense, theory holds all the water... bravo!
Ok this theory is actually so convincing. I know a lot of these ideas have been brought up before, but the way this is suggested through the lore and books actually lines up so well. This is why we love FuhNaff- you cooked so hard
"Ok this theory is actually so convincing. I know a lot of these ideas have been brought up before, but the way this is suggested through the lore and books actually lines up so well. This is why we love FuhNaff- you cooked so hard" What point specifically was convincing?
@@mafi978 two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time, and yet we see this exactly contradicted in the books. you can't just use a one-off to completely disprove a theory with this much evidence
@@bynosaurus4024 Maybe and only maybe the FF books aren't in the same continuity as the games, have you ever stopped to think about that???? :/ VIP is literally saying "Two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time", and we know VIP is 100% in the same continuity as the games, and there is also that FNAF World ending of the two Fredbears. The case of Molten Freddy/Ennard is different bc MF is an amalgam made of metal, cables and endoskeletons, and is not a stable body, while GF is, it can't maintain its body as we have seen in PS and SB, it is not the "same space" and it is infused with big quantities of the remnant, not pure souls as GF would be.
Another addition to the idea that Garrett also possesses Golden Freddy in the movie is that in Abby’s drawing of Afton killing the children, she draws a child with a top hat, a child in blue, a blonde girl and a boy with a hook, clearly depicting the ghosts that possess Freddy, Bonnie, Chica and Foxy respectively. The fifth child however has no identification linking to the Golden Freddy child, instead wearing red, which is the colour of the shirt we see Garrett wearing in Mike’s flashbacks. The argument against this is that this child’s hair is drawn in a way that could be a black cap, which Garrett does not wear, but my response to this is that the Bonnie child is shown wearing a blue hat which he doesn’t wear, and also we don’t exactly have any male hair drawn by Abby in this drawing to compare against, since the others are all wearing hats, so it could very well just be how she drew male hair, especially since I believe she draws this hastily. I think the red shirt’s connection to Garrett as an alternate depiction of Golden Freddy combined with the other drawing where Golden Freddy child’s face is taped over are stronger evidence than the counterpoints.
Ooooh, also if that's the case... Abby has been talking to the GF spirit the entire movie, and we see that she sees him as a child, not as the suit. If all the other ones are depicting the children the way they appear... Why not do that with Golden Freddy kid? Why change it to look so different, when if anything this should be the one she would recognize how to draw the MOST. 🤔
I hate the 2 spirit golden theories because they usually have too many plotholes but this explains a lot of FNAF 4, the security log book, Fazbear frights, and golden Freddy perfectly
This is the most clear and concise 2 spirit Golden theory I've seen yet. The way he directly correlated the Stitchwraith to the faded and altered spirits was especially convincing IMO.
@@knaughta.masso-kist5944 What’s missing is that Andrew had an evil spirit in him that presented itself as “William Afton” but was defeated by the puppet with a song, making it questionable if it was ever William Afton at all. I say this because it implies that “William Afton” will actually be someone who knows Charlie to be easily manipulated by her. And “William Afton” could be the “him” that is controlling Cassidy’s spirit. Inception kinds of twisting.
@@knaughta.masso-kist5944 On a second thought, maybe Shadow Freddy is the shadow princess that lingers in Cassidy (the golden princess) to control her. And “the one you shouldn’t have killed” could be related to it, like a BROTHER. Something like Shadow Bonnie, the entity that would be lingering in Springtrap, like how shadow Freddy lingers in GF. It makes more sense since the entity refers to the “one you shouldn’t have killed” to be someone else. An outright boy getting avenged for.
That’s insane detail the blond haired kid’s face was GLUED onto the body. John can pick out nearly any hidden detail. Such a great theory. Amazing job!
The link to the movie made this really solid. Also explains why Abby out of all kids in the town got contacted by the spirits, it's Garret's sister. With golden Freddie I was personally wondering if faded and altered text might be the same person, difference being possession and agony. Altered not seeing and not remembering but he does recognise faded's voice, that's Cassidy. They know that voice belongs to "Cassidy" (which might be them. They have to know each other to recognise each other btw, that's an interesting point too in my opinion). But if the movie meant to clarify stuff about the game then that one drawing was a really solid point and solved it, 2 kids possessing 1 animatronic.
"With golden Freddie I was personally wondering if faded and altered text might be the same person, difference being possession and agony. Altered not seeing and not remembering but he does recognise faded's voice, that's Cassidy. They know that voice belongs to "Cassidy" (which might be them. They have to know each other to recognise each other btw, that's an interesting point too in my opinion)." Fun fact, like how Cassidy talks directly in the Logbook, and CC uses edited text, in FNaF 1, Cassidy laughs in her own voice, while CC communicates through edited text. They also both have a drawing they drew when alive, both saying "(It's) Me" on them in different handwriting. A girl in lower case, and a boy being watched by an animatronic in upper case. "then that one drawing was a really solid point and solved it, 2 kids possessing 1 animatronic." So does the drawings in FNaF 1, but the community sadly overlooked it.
The changing of memories theme in the games also explains the drawings in the movie. That's something I've seen a lot of criticism for; people seem to think the drawing of all the kids holding hands with the yellow rabbit suddenly making them forget what happened to them is a random and poor narrative choice. I think this video explains perfectly how that mechanic works, though, and the drawings changing the kids' memories makes perfect sense in the context of the games. What I now no longer understand is why the souls were never set free in the movie if their worst memory was altered in such a way. Maybe it has to do with the intent of whomever is altering those memories, or maybe it's because Cassidy (or their equivalent in the movie) held on to vengeance and is preventing everyone else from moving on - but if his memories were altered too, as shown in the drawing where his head is placed on top of the other kid's and mirroring how Golden Freddy works in the games, then why isn't he at peace? Shouldn't it then be the other way around, where now Garrett *can't see* the good altered memory and is now the one capable of vengeance? Shouldn't it be Garrett's head plastered on top in the picture, so that he's the one able to *see* the good memory? Is Cassidy just immune to the memory change because of the sheer intensity of his vengeance? It's not like the other kids were willing to just let it go; I mean they were ultimately the ones to bring Afton to his demise, and Chica and Carl actually did the most to ensure the springlocks went off. Maybe that's just meant to be a parallel to the "I was the first" line and show that she's also more angry than the others, but I find it odd that Golden Freddy and his spirit(s) weren't even present when Afton was springlocked. The final scene with Cassidy closing the door on Afton and imprisoning him in the restaurant to suffer is great, but I feel like he should have played more of a part in Afton's death like he did in the fnaf 3 minigame. Maybe this doesn't actually mean anything for once, though. I don't know. Just some thoughts.
This has always been my theory as well (and tbh I assumed it was easily the most popular), but one aspect that I've seen be questioned before is the notion of Cassidy being TOYSNHK. Specifically, the idea being what makes Cassidy so special? That of all of Afton's victims and all his heinous crimes, why is Cassidy the one that should have been spared (instead of Charlie, Susie, or CC for instance)? And my interpretation has always been that "TOYSNHK" is basically a threat-that it's not saying "This was where you went too far, William", it's saying "This was where your plan backfired. This was the wrong kid to pick."
I think the reason Cassidy is The One You Should Not Have Killed is because they had more of a capacity for hatred and vengeance than the other kids did. I think that's why she set up UCN where the other kids just moved on. I also see it as a message to the likes of "you shouldn't have killed this kid specifically", but moreso in terms of "you picked the wrong kid to mess with".
@@uglebeffus >is because they had more of a capacity for hatred and vengeance than the other kids did. Consider instead: Cassidy was shoved in a SPRINGLOCK SUIT. One of THE most brutal ways to die, and a whole level beyond just getting Stuffed/Murdered like the other Kids. ADDITIONALLY, William had the sheer Gall 2 years later to wear her around while he kills AGAIN.
this makes so much sense i genuinely think this is the cleanest golden freddy theory i’ve watched. it’s funny cause all these points have definitely connected in my head but because the community at the time was a little misguided i was also confused about all of this
"this makes so much sense i genuinely think this is the cleanest golden freddy theory i’ve watched." Close, but not close enough. "it’s funny cause all these points have definitely connected in my head but because the community at the time was a little misguided i was also confused about all of this" has the community ever not been misguided by their own actions?
@@ender01o66 i didn’t say it’s confirmed it just makes the most sense to me so far compared to many other golden freddy theories i have seen. also obviously we’ve been misguided by ourselves since we are literally all we got to solve this games lore. i think it’s okay to be open to theory’s and even just consuming them for the fun of it
@@mafi978 2 of anything cannot occupy the same space at the same time. unless you like collisions💀 in this case it makes sense to maybe have cassidy’s body and soul in golden freddy and also crying child’s soul. if anything there’s only one body stuffed in it but 2 souls occupying. again, stitch wrathe told us this is possible so i don’t see how vip, a book about security breach, is fully relevant to this specific topic
I always thought that (until fnaf 3) golden freddy was the killer himself. It just sorta made sense that in a series called "Five Nights at Freddy's" that the main killer would be freddy. And that what made the spirit haunting golden freddy so special was the fact that they were stuffed in the same suit that the killer wore. Just a little head canon i used to believe that always made a little sense to me. Amazing video btw, keep up the good work! :] Edit: oh and i forgot to mention that Golden freddy's titular phrase is "it's me" maybe pointing to "it's me the killer" Doesn't really matter anymore since William used the springbonnie suit but it's a fun thought experiment!
The Fact that Phone Guy specifically mentions a yellow suit in the back room was moved in Fnaf 2 really made me think Golden Freddy was originally supposed to be the killing suit. It was the only yellow suit in the series at the time that wasn't Chica.
"I always thought that (until fnaf 3) golden freddy was the killer himself. It just sorta made sense that in a series called "Five Nights at Freddy's" that the main killer would be freddy. And that what made the spirit haunting golden freddy so special was the fact that they were stuffed in the same suit that the killer wore. Just a little head canon i used to believe that always made a little sense to me. Amazing video btw, keep up the good work! :]" This is true though, the killer used both Golden Freddy and Spring Bonnie suits.
@@NotUlpoadingAnything "The Fact that Phone Guy specifically mentions a yellow suit in the back room was moved in Fnaf 2 really made me think Golden Freddy was originally supposed to be the killing suit. It was the only yellow suit in the series at the time that wasn't Chica." Both were used.
Personally, I really love Dual Process Theory's interpretation, mainly because it's so narratively satisfying, but you do make some good points. Guess we're just gonna be chasing this one around the mulberry bush forever.
I appreciate that repeat yourself in the video. Every time you give an answer and reach a conclusion you summarize what you've said before moving onto the next topic. It really helps the viewer understand, thank you for doing this
"I appreciate that repeat yourself in the video. Every time you give an answer and reach a conclusion you summarize what you've said before moving onto the next topic. It really helps the viewer understand, thank you for doing this" I agree, it's really helpful, and nice.
I solved the retcon. It’s Golden Freddy MCI. Golden Freddy was originally the suit used for the MCI, but then the twist of FNAF 3 is that it’s primary antagonist is the actual killer who used the golden Bonnie suit. That’s why the retcon was seemless, it was a twist. Watch the videos from FNAF 1 and 2 and everyone will say GF was the suit used to cause the MCI. Now 100% of the community knows it was Springtrap. Remember, the one piece of evidence that GF was the MCI suit was “There was a spare suit in the back, a yellow one. Someone used it.” That also explains how the retcon was done before the Reddit post, which was prior to FNAF 6 came out. That game was the one that revealed that Puppet was a girl and that “Save HIM” referred to the puppet, not the spirit. The timing of the post means the retcon needs to be between FNAF 2 and FNAF SL (as FNAF 1 can’t retcon FNAF 1) Edit: as Piggehh pointed out below, GF doesn’t start attacking the player until the same night where “there was a suit in the back, a yellow one” was used for either the MCI, DCI, or just one murder (Cassidy?). This means “the yellow suit” HAD to have been GF, as that implication is extremely obvious, as there was only one yellow suit in the lore at that time.
that's unlikely to be true because there were still 5 victims and we know from FNAF 2 that the 5th was golden freddy. So Golden Freddy was the suit that killed them AND the 5th kid? Golden Bonnie just makes more sense, and given the fact that FNAF 3 only came out 3-4 months after FNAF 2, it's kinda unlikely Scott didn't have the idea for Golden Bonnie in his head already, especially because Shadow Bonnie exists. It's not a bad theory AT ALL though
We were never told what type of suit was used, just that it was yellow. Golden Freddy was our only option back then but Scott probably planned for a yellow bonnie variant by that point. I don't think this was the retcon but good idea
@@DaDaPieGaming What is stopping pre-FNAF 3 theorists from assuming that the body was not hidden in GF, or that the GF suit was used and the body was stuffed after the killer left the suit?
@@SaggyWaggy-is8it That’s the thing though: the retcon was so seamless that no one noticed and he never needed to clarify it (his words in the post are something like that). FNAF 1 was supposed to be the FINAL game he ever made. There’s no way he was planning FNAF 3 whenever he was working on his “last” game. The killer in F1 was disguised as a character and lured children away, but the animatronic suits are full of things that will kill you if you’re inside them. Thus, the final suit is slumped over, showing how it doesn’t have the internals necessary to transport itself. This means the only option for the MCI suit in FNAF 1 was either Golden Freddy, or a fur suit/costume that was never mentioned.
Awesome theory John, really takes me back to the good old time when theories were simple, effective and easy to follow. You’ve got a lot of nice catchs in this one and several mind blowing moments. Loved the reflection of the happiest day part. Very entertaining to watch, good job man! Keep the amazing work!
Heard Astralspiff talking about this video, John literally called him like at 2AM about the lore. 😂 About ONE specific detail that he realized blew the lid open on the FNAF lore. I can't wait to find out
"About ONE specific detail that he realized blew the lid open on the FNAF lore. I can't wait to find out" I wonder what it is... The Remnant lake in RUIN?
loved how this video was presented (that being game release order rather then chronologically) ive been on and off in the fan base for like 2 years and only occasionally look into the lore now but this video was structured in such an informing way i wasnt confused at any part, please make more like this!
"loved how this video was presented (that being game release order rather then chronologically)" It's the best way to go to be fair. "ive been on and off in the fan base for like 2 years and only occasionally look into the lore now but this video was structured in such an informing way i wasnt confused at any part, please make more like this!" Exactly.
I always love watching your theories, the way you use logic and connect the dots so coherently without stretching makes it feel like it all connects together so well and that there is a pattern we can follow to figure out the rest of the lore.
If this is true it would litterly explain why in fnaf 3's bad ending both eyes were lit up even though 2 spirits possessed Golden Freddy bcs Cassidy possesses the head. Nice theory!
What’s in the box? It’s the pieces put together. I think that what was in the box was supposed to be CC’s Foxy plush. I think this because CC’s Foxy plush is literally without its head. It is in pieces. It is Michael’s repressed memories of tormenting his brother. It’s why he wears a Foxy mask, to taunt his brother over what he did to one of his friends. I think that eventually, Michael opens the box (which we see in FNAF World) and puts the plush back together, which is why in the FNAF 4 gameplay we see the plush in the closet as whole, not without its head. The only way Michael would have been able to help the other children is to first confront what he did to his brother. This is why Happiest Day resembles CC’s birthday at Fredbear’s, not because we are releasing CC, but because Michael is using those memories he finally put back together to help the spirits currently trapped. I think the reason Scott chose to forget (or more aptly, not follow up on) what was in the box, was because he felt that Michael’s arc of confronting his past was not clear enough, and so he created Sister Location. Sister Location shows us Michael trying to atone for past mistakes by putting his sister back together, and shows us that Michael holds a grudge against his father. I do think Scott eventually gave the role of freeing the spirits to Henry rather than Michael though, because we didn’t understand what Scott meant with the box. We know that we play as the same character in the first four FNAF games because the Mike and Fritz get fired for the same reason, the night guard in FNAF 3 has seen animatronics that you could only see at the FNAF 2 location (Withered Golden Freddy, Mangle, etc), and the character we play as in FNAF 4 hears audio from one of the FNAF 1 phone calls in reverse. The character from FNAF 4 also has purple toys of a fan, a robot, and a phone, which not only indicate he is a security guard, but also that he has a connection to Purple Guy (William Afton), as the only toys that are purple are the ones relevant to him being a security guard. Scott also hinted that we played as Michael when in the GT livestream, he asked “Have you thought about who the security guard is?” and “four games, one story” on his website. It’s possible Scott was trying to tell us that Michael was dreaming of the FNAF 4 mini-games too, as Mangle should not exist in 1983, if Mangle had a toy it would be Funtime Foxy, not Mangle. Scott drew attention to Toy Chica’s missing beak as a way to get us to look at the other toys, specifically Foxy, and why the Foxy plush is missing its head. I also think it’s possible that the reason that The Silver Eyes trilogy places such an emphasis on Theodore, the Ella doll and closets, was to point us in the right direction. I know none of this is really relevant I just wanted to share.
Technically speaking, there is nothing in the box anymore-hell, the box doesn't even exist now. Scott told Dawko that the idea of what he wanted to be in the box no longer fits into the current narrative, so we shouldn't waste our time on it anymore.
@@grandempressvicky6387 I know nothing is in the box now, but that doesn’t mean I can’t think about what Scott had in mind when he was making it. He had something he wanted to pursue, but the story didn’t pan out that way. So by looking at how the story turned out, compared to just eh story of the first four games, we can get a better idea of what might have been in it.
@@Randombookwoorm I think Scott used Sister Location as a different kind of box. They have both portrayed (or would have) Michael confronting his past. However, Sister Location changes some of the details, by introducing Elizabeth, and having Michael be injected with remnant (memories) rather than opening the box (which we don’t even know is open, but FNAF World suggests it is). By Pizzeria Simulator, the role of “person who wants to release the children” is given to Henry as well, which I don’t think was originally the plan at all.
15:28, The character that played as the kid possessing Golden Freddy doesn’t have blonde hair, his hair was dyed to that color. But the one thing that is connected to what you just said, is that the kid who plays as that spirit has blue eyes, and when you brighten up the image for Cassidy in ultimate custom night, The eyes are blue too.
@@Limomonyeah that was what I was gonna say. That basically confirms it bc they went out of their way to make sure the child was blonde, seems pretty important
"The character that played as the kid possessing Golden Freddy doesn’t have blonde hair, his hair was dyed to that color." Yup, he was a brown haired boy with blue eyes, and his hair was dyed blond. Who knows, this may or may not have lore significance (his hair may have been brown, but becoming Golden Freddy altered his hair colour). "But the one thing that is connected to what you just said, is that the kid who plays as that spirit has blue eyes, and when you brighten up the image for Cassidy in ultimate custom night, The eyes are blue too." Yes, the (not confirmed to be Cassidy) TOYSNHK image has blue eyes, not when you brighten it up, but when you put the eyes into photonegative, as they were edited with a photonegative filter, so applying it again undoes the effect. The Crying Child in FNaF World also has blue eyes. Also, the blond boy having blue eyes may connect to the eye colour of the Yellow Bear in the Movie.
@@Daydream_N "yeah that was what I was gonna say. That basically confirms it bc they went out of their way to make sure the child was blonde, seems pretty important" Yeah, they're 99.9% TOYSNHK.
I was thinking about the idea of "the one you should not have killed". Given the happiest day minigame's connection to the crying child's death scene, could it make sense that Afton killed the four children wearing the masks as revenge for them killing his child? Then, if he stuffed them into the matching suits, that would align with the happiest day minigame. Then the "one you should not have killed", probably Cassidy, could be a random victim, or somebody innocent who Afton killed despite them not being involved in the incident at all. That would explain the vengeance of the spirit as well as the particular reason he should not have been killed. The only issue could then relate to other victims from Afton, since he'd have no motivation to do that. I like this video's theory btw, it all seems to match up very nicely
This was really good. The ONLY thing I think would've been awesome if you mentioned it (after explaining that Cassidy controls the head), is that, precisely, each time you get a jumpscare from GF is in fact, the head. And also in UCN the GF at the end seems like it's being restricted by it's body (aka the other spirit) but this is something more subjective, it's just a detail that I like to point out.
I got chills when you brought up the movie evidence! I never noticed that in the drawing! Your theory makes complete sense from beginning to end and has me believing this too.
"I got chills when you brought up the movie evidence! I never noticed that in the drawing!" Yup, it's been there since last year, but only a few people (including me) noticed it was there (and we were called crazy for it). I'm glad it's out in the spotlight now, so there's more people agreeing with it.
The movie thing is a bit of a mind blown moment. In terms of ‘how’ CC ends up in Golden Freddy, my best guess is he initially possessed the plush. What if William used the plush as part of how he lured the MCI. An inverted Funtime Freddy, a Bonnie with a small Freddy in his hand. When he had his hands full with two kids at once, he used the plush to quiet one kid while he killed the other. Lacking a place for the extra kid, he had to put them into Golden Freddy. Wild speculation of course. It could also be William knowing the plush is haunted and trying to give CC ‘life’ by transferring it into a larger body. [maybe where his remnant studies began or were leading]
The thing I dislike about the Stitchwraith parallel is that the "lore relevant parallels" should always lead us towards already established information. When did Scott establish "two souls in Golden Freddy"? At the very latest, he did that in FNAF 4. And HOW did he do that? That's the problem I want answered. The Logbook and Stitchwraith should expand on the concepts introduced in FNAF 4. They shouldn't be treated as PRIMARY evidence, but just a push towards evidence left in FNAF 4 (or earlier). FNAF World does that quite well because it just ties "putting back together" with FNAF 3 minigames - it's a simple connection that we've made before World was released. In the same way, FNAF 4 makes connections between Bite Victim and Golden Freddy and it creates confusion between him and the fifth MCI victim, HOWEVER, FNAF 4 on its own says nothing that could imply that they're BOTH possessing Golden Freddy. That's my problem with this theory. For me, ShatterVictim/MemoryVictim makes more sense. I think the connections are more symbolical. Bite Victim seems to be Golden Freddy (it's a connection with FNAF 3) but he also seems to be bite victim (of '87; it's a connection with FNAF 2) and he also has ties with Mike (connection with FNAF 1). I think he's "Golden Freddy" as much as he's Jeremy or Mike. He's connected to other games, but not in a literal way. For more elaboration, google both ShatterVictim and MemoryVictim because they're both very interesting theories.
@@zeldafan6124 I'm saying that Bite Victim "seems to be Golden Freddy" but he ALSO "seems to be FNAF2 Bite Victim". The point is that he is neither of them, but he is connected through a parallel to both.
I think the two souls possessing golden Freddy is established in FNAF 2 by the shadow animatronics one is more aggressive and shows in the office i.e. Shadow bonnie which I think is a stand in for the vengeful spirit she takes form as a bunny as a nod to her killer William Afton in the spring bonnie suit while shadow Freddy is the crying child who is more passive and is only confined in the parts and service room.
@@Ponguj "The thing I dislike about the Stitchwraith parallel is that the "lore relevant parallels" should always lead us towards already established information." Exactly. For example, Hide and Seek shows that RWQFSFASXC can hide in shadows, which allows them to control the thing or person the shadow belongs to. This is previously shown in FNaF 4, where RWQFSFASXC is in Fredbear's shadow during the Bite of '83. This story also has instances of where RWQFSFASXC stops hiding in their shadow, and stays where the actual shadow was a few moments ago. This same thing happens in FNaF 4, where an employee wears Fredbear in FNaF 4, but RWQFSFASXC pretending to be Fredbear's shadow is still there on stage. "When did Scott establish "two souls in Golden Freddy"?" FNaF 1, he used a similar method that he used in the Movie, using the drawings, with it being more or less obvious. "That's the problem I want answered." Answered it for you. "The Logbook and Stitchwraith should expand on the concepts introduced in FNAF 4. They shouldn't be treated as PRIMARY evidence" Btw, to continue the Stitchwraith parallel, Andrew is killed by Fetch's jaws clamping down on his head, he then leaves a hospital in TMIR1280, and walks over to another Fetch animatronic and possesses it. The battery from this animatronic is then used in the Stitchwraith. Like Crying Child, he acts as a power source. As for the Logbook... like how Cassidy talks directly in the Logbook, and CC uses edited text, in FNaF 1, Cassidy laughs in her own voice, while CC communicates through edited text. They also both have a drawing they drew when alive, both saying "(It's) Me" on them in different handwriting. A girl in lower case, and a boy being watched by an animatronic in upper case. "then that one drawing was a really solid point and solved it, 2 kids possessing 1 animatronic." So does the drawings in FNaF 1, but the community sadly overlooked it. "FNAF World does that quite well because it just ties "putting back together" with FNAF 3 minigames - it's a simple connection that we've made before World was released." Yup, exactly. There's also the connection made between Crying Child and the Shadow (puppet) in FNaF 3. "For me, ShatterVictim/MemoryVictim makes more sense." For me, ShadowShatterVictim makes the most sense of any theory, as it implements everything with no stone left unturned. "I think the connections are more symbolical. Bite Victim seems to be Golden Freddy (it's a connection with FNAF 3)" And the other animatronics, as shown in FNaF 1's hallucinations. "but he also seems to be bite victim (of '87; it's a connection with FNAF 2)" The FNaF 4 teasers and FNaF World Mobile also suggest this. "For more elaboration, google both ShatterVictim and MemoryVictim because they're both very interesting theories." I'll go more in-depth with ShadowShatterVictim if you wish.
@@zeldafan6124 Meanwhile Crying Child lost his frontal lobe, but survived inside the other animatronics. This is also the plot of The Desolate Hope, Scott's game prior to FNaF 1, where a human child survives within the code of five robots, with the fifth being a broken down one that's always sitting. The plot of ITP also comes from Chipper and Son's, where a robot replaces the protagonist's father.
Wow incredible uncovering this!! You helping solve plus scotts way of uncovering things without directly telling us is just amazing. I love all the theories all being born and this is what keeps this community alive and thriving. And new generations loving it. Im 32 I've been watching fnaf lore for a very long time now. I have an 11 year old son who on his own got into fnaf a few years ago. It's amazing we both get to talk about lore and watch the movies and let's plays together. Love it. Scott created something so special. Plus he seems like a great guy. I love this community so much and people like you who keep it thriving!
This has actually given me an idea for the case of the Shadow animatronics. The only shadows are Freddy and Bonnie, both of which relate to Animatronics filled with hate and malice. Cassidy in GF, and Afton in SB. We know manifestations of emotions exist in the FNaF universe, so it could be possible that both Shadow Freddy and Shadow Bonnie are manifestations of *Hatred and Malice, both representing Cassidy and Afton* I could also just be spitballing too much here
This is a really great theory! For some additional evidence - consider that in FNAF 4 Night 4, we see what looks like a child stuck in a springlock suit, and we also see in FNAF 3 Stage 01 that there was a single child who went missing at Fredbear's. Cassidy seems to have died in a Springlock suit like Afton, which would explain why they both possess supernatural abilities and seem more in-control than the others.
I'm still not completely sold on the whole two characters thing, even after all these years. But damn that picture evidence is really good, great spot that! Also I have a friend whom I think looks quite similar to you, and weirdly enough he was the one I went to the FNAF movie with! Just thought it was a funny coincidence worth mentioning.
"I'm still not completely sold on the whole two characters thing, even after all these years. But damn that picture evidence is really good, great spot that!" There's also the "(It's) Me" drawings in FNaF 1. One of a boy, and we hear the voice of the other, a girl. Crying Child also alters the text in the FNaF 1 location, and in Mike's eyes. This interaction of direct speech and altered text is identical to how they communicate in the Logbook. "Also I have a friend whom I think looks quite similar to you, and weirdly enough he was the one I went to the FNAF movie with! Just thought it was a funny coincidence worth mentioning." lmao, he's a mimic.
10:02 how is the question of why they are important answered by ucn? We find out they're "the one you should not have killed" but I don't think it answers why they are important? Unless it's supposed to mean theyre important because they're keeping Afton hostage in hell but it still doesn't explain why they're important enough to have that power
>but it still doesn't explain why they're important enough to have that power Simple, Cassidy is really, REALLY fucking pissed. Getting the most Overkill Death, then being worn around for William's second Murder Spree will do that.
Also in fnaf 2, golden freddy can become a floating head and in the jumpscare, the only part of him that appears is his head so CC in fnaf 2 was trying to hold Cassidy back, but ultimately failed after Cassidy separated the head and jumpscared the nightguard
"Also in fnaf 2, golden freddy can become a floating head and in the jumpscare, the only part of him that appears is his head" This is due to the MCI possessing the heads of the animatronics. This is shown in Give gifts. Give life. I'd say nice try, but it's unrelated to the actual duo evidence. Also, it's not just the FNaF Movie drawings that suggest a duo... the game drawings do as well.
I think your explanation on golden Freddy is the most logical theory we can make. It makes with all information we can gather from the games, books and even from the movie the most sense. Good job 🎉
My big issue with the debate is always this: if Cassidy is the vengeful spirit...why? So much effort is put into explaining who Golden Freddy is, but when it comes to Cassidy (which I do think is likely) I feel nothing. So Afton's biggest threat is some random kid he killed who happened to want to torture him because...reasons? I genuinely hope future games cover this because it's bugged me for so long.
I think it's because Afton put Cassidy in the Golden Freddy suit in fnaf 2 and springlocked them to death. That’s what happened the day someone "used" the old yellow suit and why the restaurant was under investigation then closed. A murder disguised as a accident. I think that's the multiple spring lock failure mentioned in fnaf 3. And why at the end of UCN Golden Freddy is twitching exactly like Springtrap was in fnaf 3. To show that he had been spring locked as well.
@@bigking3218 Again where's the narrative? sure okay the death is brutal but who is She? What does She do? How did She end up there? Why did Afton springlock her and not the others? She has nothing to her name other than hate and it's not like with AM where the Hate is part of the irony of his character being an AI and such aswell and this is important the Guy has other stuff going for him. As for her what does she have? nothing. For crying out loud we know more about Susie than the "Protagonist" of the story. (Also narratively there is just nothing and in fact makes her even more infuriating cause you mean a background character in the first few games and a dead child of an event that happened long ago is that important to the overarching narrative of the story?)
There's some context in FNaF World you left out that actually inclines me to believe Happiest Day being for the Crying Child wasn't the intended reading here. At one point in the game, Glitch Fredbear says "You need to leave breadcrumbs for him, to help him find his way," in reference to the clocks. And at the end of the game, once you collect all the clocks & enter a secret portal, the yellow eyes tells the Crying Child "The pieces are in place for you. All you have to do is find them." All this implies that the Crying Child isn't the one who receives Happiest Day, but instead the one who sets it up, as he's the one "finding" the Happiest Day minigames.
I think the glowing eyes are meant to be a different character than glitchbear, talking to (proably) CC. The opening cutscene repeats the "I will put you back together" line. Also, notably, only glowing eyes are visible... almost like the person they are talking to "can't see". The player is probably either Mike or Cassidy (if you subscribe to the theory that the spirits can interact with the game world), so it's not CC who sets up happiest day, he's just being addressed in some of the cutscenes.
@@timeturnerdust6093 Why would they be different characters? Glitchbear has those same yellow eyes, and there's no indication that they're different. The player also can't be Mike or Cassidy, since Glitchbear tells the player "You were created for one thing." The player is most likely just Adventure Freddy. CC setting up Happiest Day is just what the text suggests. I'm just the messenger.
@@UnoriginalJokester I mean it's definitely possible that they're the same character, but I'd also argue that an 8-bit style limits how you can represent spooky glowing eyes in the dark haha. FNAF is also frustratingly vague sometimes. I think that if they're not the same character, then they're talking to different characters in those different forms. I think that the glowing-eyes form of glitchbear is talking to CC, and in the full-body form he's talking to the player character (who I don't think is CC). I think that CC setting up his own happiest day makes no sense. Like, he's been a super passive character this whole time and suddenly he gains the agency and ability to free his own soul? idk. Like, obviously possible but I don't find it likely.
also the "created for just one thing" thing could be referring to the player's avatar so that they can interact with the spirit/game world, but I'd have to look back for the context of the line since it's been a while since I've seen gameplay
@@timeturnerdust6093 Again, we have no reason to believe Glitchbear & the yellow eyes are separate characters. They both share the same motivation of helping CC & putting pieces in place for him, and something as simple as changing eye color wouldn't be restricted under an 8-bit style. And yeah, regardless of if they're different characters or not, CC is only being spoken to in the intro & ending cutscenes. That's basically a guarantee. That's the thing, though. FNaF World telling us CC set up Happiest Day means there's no proof that Happiest Day was for CC at all. They're completely different roles. The problem there is that Glitchbear doesn't say "your avatar" or something like that. It says "YOU were created for one thing." And while FNaF can be vague sometimes, I wouldn't accuse it of being THAT misleading.
Funny thing, in a scrapped r rated script for the FNAF film, Abby's drawing had all the kids who were said/shown to be killed, but in the final film, the blonde boy is missing from the drawing, I recently theorized that maybe he and Garrett are actually one and the same somehow. Like some sort of a split personality thing. This could also apply to the crying child maybe having a split personality. Kind of like gollum and dr. Jakyll.
But then why do we get the "come find me" at the end of the movie with the puppet's music box playing? Mike never got closure for his brother. You know?
@@LightningTime777 "But then why do we get the "come find me" " "(Come) Find Me" is a quote associated with RWQFSFASXC/Glitchtrap in the games. "with the puppet's music box playing?" Have you seen the Secret Of The Mimic trailer? The music isn't exclusive to the Marionette. The music is linked to Henry, the creator. "Mike never got closure for his brother. You know?" Perhaps he will, one day...
Random thing, i was wondering. There's probably a simple explanation that i didn't see, but with the somewhat established timeline, why would the crying child have all four plushies and fredbears family diner still exists? Im guessing there's a time overlap im missing as to where freddy and the gang also existed while fredbears was still open.
I love this theory SO MUCH Ah it feels like you’ve put the pieces together in my mind :,,) I’ve been following this for so long! I remember when these games came out and no one could understand why /why/ that mini game showed the masks… was it the children? Why in the bad ending does it show all the masks? Are they all at peace? But this theory shows that we are going into the crying child’s mind and saving him, by changing his birthday! And you’re the first one I’ve seen make that connection that it’s his birthday. And that the point is to change the meaning. I’m so excited for the next fnaf movie too omg
I think the writing in the dust in the movie confirms that garret is in Golden Freddy as well as the Cassidy stand in. There would be no point to have that there if not to say that.
@@ender01o66Think about it in the context of the games. Mike is working in fnaf 1, and crying child is telling him it's me. In the movie, Mike is working in fnaf 1, and Garret is telling him it's me. It'll be a big reveal in one of the movies that Garret is possessing one of the animatronics. In my opinion there's no way they stop Garret's story at "yeah I killed him lol"
@@Forgottensnapdragon yeah the whole entire theory is that there are 2 kids inside golden freddy. Also what evidence is there that he's going to be the puppet?
The fact that Cassidy is the one that controls the head and Crying Child controls the body could explain why Golden Freddy’s jumpscare is just his head. That’s the only hostile part of him. Up until UCN, when Crying Child is put to rest, and only Cassidy remains. That could also explain why the jumpscare is a fully animated Fredbear
woah I love this!! I agree, that makes a lot of sense!
we need this comment to be seen
My exact thoughts like death coin basically makes crying child dissapear and vengful spirit stays to attack you with full body of golden freddy.
GREAT POINT OMG
also explains gf just slouching in the floor rather than standing up, as his body may be controled by a spirit that already moved on, thanks to the puppet and the happiest day minigame
I’m 100% sure as a 56 year old man I’ll still be wondering about golden Freddy and its role in this franchise.
Fax tho😂
Honestly I believe he's role is to keep fans theories
@@sediqammar-gx1vb if only it could be that easy
agreed
@@sediqammar-gx1vbthat needs to end sooner or later
I never even wouldve noticed that the blonde kids head was glued onto the drawing if it wasnt for you. Amazing discovery John!
@Kassibon-rg1km I would've thought even Matpat noticed that
@@CouchCactus Maybe it's something he was asked not to mention or he felt others should discover for themselves since he was able to see many of the props in person and had a lot of meta knowledge about the movie?
@Kassibon-rg1kmI discovered this a year ago when the Movie first released.
This isn’t a new discovery.
@@homerman76 I guess we'll never know
@@homerman76 Matpat was at the set in very early production so it's likely that this set wasn't made/was in the process of being made when he went for his recording.
I love this theory so much. The whole “flip the happiest day and it becomes the bite” was soooo good. But the glued face on golden Freddy kid was incredible!
I think this guy solved it
@@siu474sameee
I think there's reason to say if that was the case, the masks would line up, no? But it doesn't
I also want to bring attention to the fact that golden Freddy’s jump scares have always been just the head, which lines up with the vengeful spirit being the head since the body is not vengeful
Except, notably, UCN! There and in no other games Golden Freddy can do a full-body jumpscare when you deathcoin him, and if you consider that at this point CC should have moved on and been laid to rest, that only strengthens the theory, because that would leave only Cassidy still in control of Golden Freddy, and therefore able to attack with his full presence!
Amazing
I believe CC posses golden freddy after Fazbear frights burning
I LOVE the clue that blond kid's face is glued on top of another kid's face in the movies. Its such a small, hard to notice detail, but says so much. I've never seen it until now
Fun fact: Cassidys face is actually one of Scotts kids 😉
Congrats, you've seen it now.
@@ender01o66 I've known that for a while
@@nabulsi05vlogsandstuff10 Nice.
I watched the movie with my younger sister because she liked FNAF, I wasn't into it, but I noticed it and it freaked me out lol now I'm a FNAF head lol
I still love how Golden Freddy is STILL the most mysterious animontronic in the series 10 years later
Shadow Bonnie
@@TheWaffleManiac07not 10 years
@@SaggyWaggy-is8it true
@@TheWaffleManiac07 RWQFSFASXC
JJ and Yendo: hi
That's also why its always Golden Freddy's head as the jumpscare whereas the body is lifeless and doesn't move, the crying child doesn't want to be aggressive and doesn't move whereas cassidy attacks as a floating head
Maybe as a reflection of how CC's head was biten by Fredbear?
Omg
👀👀👀
@@PhillipClearmanMaybe.
Maybe that could be an explanation of the Golden Freddy jumpscare crashing your game, it's CC trying to protect us, it's the only jumpscare in the games where it doesn't result in a bloody game over screen
The more I learn about FNAF lore, the more I admire Scott's ways of creating such a complex story, so much so that even the first game is still relevant even a decade after its release.
I'm pretty sure Scott made this accidentally, hence all the plot holes throughout the games. I like Scott and his games, but I'm not going to lie and say everything made sense, because it doesn't, which is explains why there are various of theories of the same thing.
@@DarthTrooper2021If you think about it his extremely avoidant way of telling the story would be quite beneficial in covering any plot holes, weird leaps of logic or retcons that might exist in the story. There's a lot to be said about the way FNAF does storytelling but it's hard to deny that it works for it!
@@DarthTrooper2021 I always felt like Scott, after failing at his previous games, just kinda let the fans speak and took their ideas and theories for FNAF. He’s got the best strategy of just letting the fans create the story/theories for him. If anything the fans should be thanking themselves.
@@MrAmbition774 I know this is a month later, but thank you. I'm not the only one who sees this. It was the community who made FNAF what it is, Scott just built the foundation for it.
He made the game, we made the story.
Let’s not forget in the movie Abby literally changes the drawing of spring Bonnie holding hands with the MCI into what actually happened (spring Bonnie holding a knife over the dead bodies of the MCI) and only then do the animatronics close in on Afton
Makes me wonder who drew the friendly drawing in the first place. Couldn't have been Afton unless the dude literally draws like a toddler lol
@@uglebeffus it would be funny if he just drew with his nondominant hand in a fist formation just to draw as childlike as possible to gaslight the animatronics better
The first drawing was Afton to make the ghost children think he's the good guy @@uglebeffus
My jaw literally dropped at the glued artwork from the movie, great find John
"My jaw literally dropped at the glued artwork from the movie, great find John"
John wasn't the first to find this, it was discovered a year ago.
@@ender01o66 This likely was their first time seeing this as it also was my first time learning this. May not have been John who found it but they likely learned this from this video.
16:08 HOLY SHIT DUDE. this is exactly why I love watching theories. You always find something a lot of us miss 😭🙏
exactly my thought
@@str4wb4eelook at “Cassidy” feet! There’s a really tiny person that could represent the crying child buried deep in the endoskeleton!
Bro just commented about this fact bc mannnnm WHATTT?!?!!? I would’ve never noticed this
@@tristanjohn1733 The hidden details in the movie and the story around Golden Freddy are insane. I would’ve never noticed this despite having seen the movie multiple times, this is actually next level storytelling😭
I already discovered that a year ago.
It's why they're only pretending to be under the control of the Yellow Rabbit.
Someone using the movie for a theory is so exciting!! It seems like everyone was so quick to brush it to the side from a theory perspective, but I think there’s so much in there that could help us with the lore (like the cut-out picture you shared here). So neat!
Yeah, I think that the movie also gave us a clue on what happened to Susie’s dead dog from FFPS (It possessed Chica’s cupcake, who acts like a dog throughout the film)
@@angelbasiliorodriguezbusto2065Who knows. The dog thing has yet to be confirmed.
@@angelbasiliorodriguezbusto2065I'd rather imagine that her dog just died... But is fair
@angelbasiliorodriguezbusto2065 That's so heartbreaking but also adorable that she still has her doggie with her 😭
@@angelbasiliorodriguezbusto2065 yeah, i also think that. The cupcake parallels really good to Susie's dog and the movie kinda strengthens the theory
the GASP i GUSPT when i realized what your implication was about this dynamic being present in the movie
I think its obvious to say that Golden Freddy was Kanye West all along. He wanted his nitrus
Little did he know the dentist was William Afton in disguise and he was giving him nightmare gas instead of laughing gas
@@RebatDialga ☠☠☠
Can i have the nitrus today
his happiest day is being surrounded by a life time supply of nitrus
the only correct golden freddy take
So, all the way back in the days of fnaf 2, if someone went "hey why does the full body of golden freddy show up but only the head flies at you in the jumpscare?" They were actually really onto something! (or at least retconned to be)
XD
"(or at least retconned to be)"
No, there was a reason back in 2014. We're shown this in Give gifts. Give life., and later in FNaF 3's endings.
All those people are finally getting their "Called it!" hype moment 10 years later hahahaha.
Just wanted to add on and say that's not what a retcon is, it would just be considered an elaboration/explanation. Retcon is when you change something already implied or established. Some people believe Charlie's gender was a retcon due to the old minigames saying "Save Him".
@@ender01o66scott cawthon retcons stuff all the time
@@jrob4988 No, he has not.
Can you even give examples to back up your statement?
@@ender01o66 R u delusional?? This whole series is based on recons it doesnt even need proof to know that
"Sheen, this is the 5th time you've found a clue that solves Golden Freddy"
But miss fowl, this clue is different!! 😂
@@SilvaShadow1990 This is a rare clue that was only available during a 2-day event in Japan!
@@SilvaShadow1990 LMAO
@@King_Luigi 😭
@@King_LuigiLet's not give them anymore ideas...
Even though most of this is still stuff a majority of the fandom probably already knows, John does such a great job explaining it and wrapping it in a neat bow. Something even Game Theory struggled to do sometimes. Great video, man. Keep it up.
You'd be surprised, a lot of people seem to have been unaware about the blond kid's head being placed over the 5th MCI kid's head.
Garrett was also said to not be in the MCI by Vanessa, so it shouldn't be him either.
This man might have actually just solved golden freddy
BROOOO I almost clicked off the video at like 12 minutes but omg connecting it to the movie and the stuff about "the happiest day" was brilliant
Can't wait for Mat's 2 hour analysis of the video😂
Yup
Oh you know already it gonna be a 2 parter 😂
Which would be funny because 90% of this video is stuff Mats been saying already for like 2 years now
Same :3
@@CamKoudo lmao
we had a whole arc about golden freddy trying to reimagine his lore just to land right back at "yeah theres two and its cassidy and crying child"
Occam's Razor. Sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one.
@@shinon748 it does not feel like the simplest answer when for 4 games it seemed heavily implied only 1 child was in control
@@omeletttte well the release order matters like the guy said
@@omeletttteWhen it concerns the amount of clear clues talking about Golden Freddy, the established theory _is_ the simplest one. Doesn't mean it's not convoluted, but the alternate theories that have been going around have to bend the evidence quite a bit to make their perspectives work, ultimately being more convoluted than the established theory. That's not to say the take was bad by any means, but I do think it ultimately made some sacrifices to evidence for the sake of supporting itself.
I was scrolling through some shorts and saw this as a notification and mentally said “Now here’s a guy who knows what he’s talking about!”
XD
😅😅
The fact that the only part glued on top of the other kid’s drawing is just the head is a great supporting detail to your theory about how Cassidy is the one in control of the head of Golden Freddy.
16:10 I like how the blonde kid (presumably Cassidy)’s head is glued on top of (presumably garrets)’s body. How Crying child cannot see and is the body, but Cassidy is the head using golden Freddy’s body
Wait that’s a really good point too…..
Dude that glued face is such a crazy find. I think you might have just found either one of the biggest hints towards something I've ever seen or a production error
This is the clearest and most satisfying Golden Freddy theory I've seen yet. I really like how you've crafted a clear timeline of evidence. Great job!
Oh for goodness sake did Scott really take the weird choice of making Golden Freddy's Jumpscare just his head flying at you and make it diegetic? Because this convoluted plot detail really does seem to solely exist to explain that design choice lol.
Cant wait for the day when chipper will be lore relavent
that's probably like half the "story" atp
scott does something without thinking much about it, fans are delusional and try and fit it into lore and then scott decides to add it because he can't write very well
This is due to the MCI kids possessing the heads of the animatronics. Cassidy only controlling the head allows her to attack at full power.
@@MistyWatersssto be fair, this is actually pretty unique and clever writing on Scott’s part
@@MistyWatersss It's more likely:
Scott (Like Hussie) drops a bunch of possible Plot Hooks, and works them in later to have it Connect Back.
FNAF 2 is LITERALLY this
Honestly, this is the most relevant, coherent and possibly true theory I've seen in a while
We already thought about the two spirit situation, but now I'm 100% sure it's THESE specific ones
Also, at the part with the drawing from the movie, I legit had a jawdrop, because I didn't realise til now that the Golden Freddy kid has another face glued on...
18:17 Into the Pit didn’t change much about Golden Freddy other than basically confirming that the Fazbear Frights novels are NOT canon to the games. The biggest reason why is because the missing children were not missing. In fact it was clearly VERY well known that they were dead. Also, they died in a party room which is just not how it goes in the games.
>The biggest reason why is because the missing children were not missing. In fact it was clearly VERY well known that they were dead. Also, they died in a party room which is just not how it goes in the games.
To be fair, this COULD easily be explained by "It's weird Imprint Shit/not the actual events", the exact same way that there nothing *human* inside the suit, and instead there's just some sort of organic toothy flesh monster.
More notably:
It's not the FNAF 1 Layout (or similar) Inside OR Outside the Pit, and the Saferooms have already been Sealed.
The fact that the Fazbear Frights novels are confirmed as non-canon solidifies the theory that the Stitchwraith is nothing more than an example/representation of how Golden Freddy works!!
@@higueraft571 it also wouldn’t make sense to be canon too bc we see Garrets plane and we know the movie isn’t canon and also Vanny’s mask which also doesn’t make sense. Tho I do feel there are some little things that give us hints to the lore this game just ain’t part of the continuity
The ballpit is not time travel. The reason the Missing Children were found in the game is because the ballpit is not a time machine, but a memory pit. A ton of stuff that happens is inaccurate because it's based on distorted memories, and the Frights epilogues literally confirm this.
@@gamesuarx I know it’s an inaccurate memory, but the layout of Jeff’s Pizza is the exact same as the one for Freddy’s. And the party room is still there. So I don’t think that really works in this case.
Anyone else just notice we are asking the same question in Help Wanted 2?
"What makes you so special?"
Can't wait to learn that we are playing as Golden Freddy during Help Wanted 2.
XD
@@AFunkyPillowIt's more likely to be Michael.
@@ender01o66I thought we all agreed it was bonnie bro? 😭
@@shabevhhI think it is 😭😭
This makes perfect sense. Afton killed a kid and tried to use his remnant to revive the crying child in golden freddy's body, but instead both souls are in the body.
Another slam DUNK from my boi
I don't recall this being said in the video 🤔
@@ender01o66Yeah, this is speculation from the Dual Process theory video and I believe does have some questionable interpretations in the evidence used to support it. I feel like the answer might still just be as simple as "CC possessed Golden Freddy because he died to it".
@@yfrit_gg >I feel like the answer might still just be as simple as "CC possessed Golden Freddy because he died to it".
Pretty much this yeah.
The "trying to revive his kids" idea i've never really felt fits William OR what we've seen.
I agree with this and also like the connection rye toast drew that Cassidy is so vengeful because William spring locked him. That would explain a lot of the releations between golden Freddy and drowning in red lakes. In the silver eyes William says getting spring locked causes you to drowned in your own blood and the book calls out he is remembering something
"I agree with this and also like the connection rye toast drew that Cassidy is so vengeful because William spring locked him."
Her*
They also have the Crying Child's memories, so they've experienced the same torment he has, which would make anyone vengeful.
"That would explain a lot of the releations between golden Freddy and drowning in red lakes."
There's also the red lake in RUIN. This red lake represents the blood from the victims this Remnant came from. It's the same case with the ball pit in ITP.
I think Cassidy is a guy cause of the movie now@@ender01o66
@@ender01o66 >They also have the Crying Child's memories
Not Necessarily? They'd be able to Communicate, but i dont think they instinctively have Shared Awareness...
As far as i know there's 0 evidence for this at all.
>so they've experienced the same torment he has, which would make anyone vengeful.
To the wrong person though, in an entirely unrelated situation???
Cassidy is Vengeful because not only was she murdered by William in the MCI, but she got one of THE most Brutal/Gruesome deaths possible, then was worn around for ANOTHER killing spree, helpless to stop him, after she died.
@@higueraft571 1. You've never heard of ShatterVictim/equivalent?
2. Imagine using Tik Tok theories as if they're factual evidence. Please, don't do that in a response if you want it to be taken seriously.
I recomend that you look up my method of getting the crying child's name. Wolfies method is to match up cc's answers with cassidy's questions in the survival logbook. While the last answer "I'm scared" is a bit off it might match with the question of "Do you have dreams?" which is on page 41. Now you have the word "Evad". But there is a mirror next to the wordsearch reading "What do you see?" which might suggest by flipping the word "Evad" backwords to "Dave". It is also worth noting that in every night you have to take a moment and self-reflect, hence why Evad becomes Dave. The Dave name has also been present before inside the FNaF books which feels like the name Dave might be onto something....
I THINK DAVE IS THE NAME OF THE FOXYMASK OLDEN BROTHER (AKA PHONE GUY)
MICHAEL IS THE CC
@@enmadaniaisabel1552 >MICHAEL IS THE CC
His ass is absolutely not.
CC Objectively Died in a Hospital. And if CC *somehow* didnt die in a Hospital, he would NOT be old enough to work at a Fazbear location in 1987 (especially if he's like 8-10 in 1983, that'd put him at most at 14).
>(AKA PHONE GUY)
Not only dumb, now canonically proven wrong. (Phone Guy is clearly an adult by 1985, meanwhile Michael/Foxybro is likely 14 or so in 83, meaning he ALSO is not a legal adult by the time Phone Guy is recording the MCI Tapes, someone who is clearly an adult)
@@higueraft571
Also FNAF 3 implies Phone Guy worked at safety instructions on Fredbear Diner, which means he was already an adult by 1983 to not only work there but also be responsible for the springlocks
@@arealhumanbean3058 >on Fredbear Diner
Considering these messages HEAVILY imply that this is just prior to the MCI (springbonnie moved, soon followed by the saferoom sealing), it's likely this was the FNAF 1 location, not Fredbear's (which was almost certainly closed by 1985)
I was skeptical about the "2 spirits 1 freddy" theory, but this video finally convinced me.
Very well explained, everything makes sense, theory holds all the water... bravo!
Ok this theory is actually so convincing. I know a lot of these ideas have been brought up before, but the way this is suggested through the lore and books actually lines up so well. This is why we love FuhNaff- you cooked so hard
"Ok this theory is actually so convincing. I know a lot of these ideas have been brought up before, but the way this is suggested through the lore and books actually lines up so well. This is why we love FuhNaff- you cooked so hard"
What point specifically was convincing?
Yeah, but "Two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time"
- Five Nights at Freddy's: VIP
:/
@@mafi978 do we take this as verbatim despite the exceptions?
@@mafi978 two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time, and yet we see this exactly contradicted in the books. you can't just use a one-off to completely disprove a theory with this much evidence
@@bynosaurus4024 Maybe and only maybe the FF books aren't in the same continuity as the games, have you ever stopped to think about that???? :/
VIP is literally saying "Two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time", and we know VIP is 100% in the same continuity as the games, and there is also that FNAF World ending of the two Fredbears.
The case of Molten Freddy/Ennard is different bc MF is an amalgam made of metal, cables and endoskeletons, and is not a stable body, while GF is, it can't maintain its body as we have seen in PS and SB, it is not the "same space" and it is infused with big quantities of the remnant, not pure souls as GF would be.
Another addition to the idea that Garrett also possesses Golden Freddy in the movie is that in Abby’s drawing of Afton killing the children, she draws a child with a top hat, a child in blue, a blonde girl and a boy with a hook, clearly depicting the ghosts that possess Freddy, Bonnie, Chica and Foxy respectively. The fifth child however has no identification linking to the Golden Freddy child, instead wearing red, which is the colour of the shirt we see Garrett wearing in Mike’s flashbacks.
The argument against this is that this child’s hair is drawn in a way that could be a black cap, which Garrett does not wear, but my response to this is that the Bonnie child is shown wearing a blue hat which he doesn’t wear, and also we don’t exactly have any male hair drawn by Abby in this drawing to compare against, since the others are all wearing hats, so it could very well just be how she drew male hair, especially since I believe she draws this hastily. I think the red shirt’s connection to Garrett as an alternate depiction of Golden Freddy combined with the other drawing where Golden Freddy child’s face is taped over are stronger evidence than the counterpoints.
Perhaps.
Although, I just remembered, Vanessa said Garrett was before the Freddy's murders, before the MCI.
Ooooh, also if that's the case... Abby has been talking to the GF spirit the entire movie, and we see that she sees him as a child, not as the suit. If all the other ones are depicting the children the way they appear... Why not do that with Golden Freddy kid? Why change it to look so different, when if anything this should be the one she would recognize how to draw the MOST. 🤔
I hate the 2 spirit golden theories because they usually have too many plotholes but this explains a lot of FNAF 4, the security log book, Fazbear frights, and golden Freddy perfectly
Exactly
Oh Don't start on how there could be 3 spirits in golden freddy
This is the most clear and concise 2 spirit Golden theory I've seen yet.
The way he directly correlated the Stitchwraith to the faded and altered spirits was especially convincing IMO.
@@knaughta.masso-kist5944 What’s missing is that Andrew had an evil spirit in him that presented itself as “William Afton” but was defeated by the puppet with a song, making it questionable if it was ever William Afton at all.
I say this because it implies that “William Afton” will actually be someone who knows Charlie to be easily manipulated by her. And “William Afton” could be the “him” that is controlling Cassidy’s spirit. Inception kinds of twisting.
@@knaughta.masso-kist5944 On a second thought, maybe Shadow Freddy is the shadow princess that lingers in Cassidy (the golden princess) to control her. And “the one you shouldn’t have killed” could be related to it, like a BROTHER. Something like Shadow Bonnie, the entity that would be lingering in Springtrap, like how shadow Freddy lingers in GF.
It makes more sense since the entity refers to the “one you shouldn’t have killed” to be someone else. An outright boy getting avenged for.
That’s insane detail the blond haired kid’s face was GLUED onto the body. John can pick out nearly any hidden detail. Such a great theory. Amazing job!
This was a really good video, I liked it a lot.
Also, WHAT?? I DIDNT KNOW ABOUT THE GLUED FACE IN THE MOVIE, that was a crazy reveal!
The link to the movie made this really solid. Also explains why Abby out of all kids in the town got contacted by the spirits, it's Garret's sister.
With golden Freddie I was personally wondering if faded and altered text might be the same person, difference being possession and agony. Altered not seeing and not remembering but he does recognise faded's voice, that's Cassidy. They know that voice belongs to "Cassidy" (which might be them. They have to know each other to recognise each other btw, that's an interesting point too in my opinion).
But if the movie meant to clarify stuff about the game then that one drawing was a really solid point and solved it, 2 kids possessing 1 animatronic.
"With golden Freddie I was personally wondering if faded and altered text might be the same person, difference being possession and agony. Altered not seeing and not remembering but he does recognise faded's voice, that's Cassidy. They know that voice belongs to "Cassidy" (which might be them. They have to know each other to recognise each other btw, that's an interesting point too in my opinion)."
Fun fact, like how Cassidy talks directly in the Logbook, and CC uses edited text, in FNaF 1, Cassidy laughs in her own voice, while CC communicates through edited text.
They also both have a drawing they drew when alive, both saying "(It's) Me" on them in different handwriting. A girl in lower case, and a boy being watched by an animatronic in upper case.
"then that one drawing was a really solid point and solved it, 2 kids possessing 1 animatronic."
So does the drawings in FNaF 1, but the community sadly overlooked it.
The Nitrous behind the slaugther
GAS goon in the wild?
Can i have nitrous today?
@@RightFootCreep nitrus*
@@meliss i really dont care
¥$
With all of these golden Freddy videos I’m curious if Steel Wool will add some new information about him in the upcoming leaks
What do you mean?
leaks?
The changing of memories theme in the games also explains the drawings in the movie. That's something I've seen a lot of criticism for; people seem to think the drawing of all the kids holding hands with the yellow rabbit suddenly making them forget what happened to them is a random and poor narrative choice. I think this video explains perfectly how that mechanic works, though, and the drawings changing the kids' memories makes perfect sense in the context of the games.
What I now no longer understand is why the souls were never set free in the movie if their worst memory was altered in such a way. Maybe it has to do with the intent of whomever is altering those memories, or maybe it's because Cassidy (or their equivalent in the movie) held on to vengeance and is preventing everyone else from moving on - but if his memories were altered too, as shown in the drawing where his head is placed on top of the other kid's and mirroring how Golden Freddy works in the games, then why isn't he at peace? Shouldn't it then be the other way around, where now Garrett *can't see* the good altered memory and is now the one capable of vengeance? Shouldn't it be Garrett's head plastered on top in the picture, so that he's the one able to *see* the good memory?
Is Cassidy just immune to the memory change because of the sheer intensity of his vengeance? It's not like the other kids were willing to just let it go; I mean they were ultimately the ones to bring Afton to his demise, and Chica and Carl actually did the most to ensure the springlocks went off. Maybe that's just meant to be a parallel to the "I was the first" line and show that she's also more angry than the others, but I find it odd that Golden Freddy and his spirit(s) weren't even present when Afton was springlocked. The final scene with Cassidy closing the door on Afton and imprisoning him in the restaurant to suffer is great, but I feel like he should have played more of a part in Afton's death like he did in the fnaf 3 minigame. Maybe this doesn't actually mean anything for once, though. I don't know.
Just some thoughts.
This has always been my theory as well (and tbh I assumed it was easily the most popular), but one aspect that I've seen be questioned before is the notion of Cassidy being TOYSNHK. Specifically, the idea being what makes Cassidy so special? That of all of Afton's victims and all his heinous crimes, why is Cassidy the one that should have been spared (instead of Charlie, Susie, or CC for instance)? And my interpretation has always been that "TOYSNHK" is basically a threat-that it's not saying "This was where you went too far, William", it's saying "This was where your plan backfired. This was the wrong kid to pick."
I think the reason Cassidy is The One You Should Not Have Killed is because they had more of a capacity for hatred and vengeance than the other kids did. I think that's why she set up UCN where the other kids just moved on.
I also see it as a message to the likes of "you shouldn't have killed this kid specifically", but moreso in terms of "you picked the wrong kid to mess with".
@@uglebeffus >is because they had more of a capacity for hatred and vengeance than the other kids did.
Consider instead:
Cassidy was shoved in a SPRINGLOCK SUIT.
One of THE most brutal ways to die, and a whole level beyond just getting Stuffed/Murdered like the other Kids.
ADDITIONALLY, William had the sheer Gall 2 years later to wear her around while he kills AGAIN.
this makes so much sense i genuinely think this is the cleanest golden freddy theory i’ve watched. it’s funny cause all these points have definitely connected in my head but because the community at the time was a little misguided i was also confused about all of this
"this makes so much sense i genuinely think this is the cleanest golden freddy theory i’ve watched."
Close, but not close enough.
"it’s funny cause all these points have definitely connected in my head but because the community at the time was a little misguided i was also confused about all of this"
has the community ever not been misguided by their own actions?
Yeah, but "Two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time"
- Five Nights at Freddy's: VIP
:/
@@ender01o66 i didn’t say it’s confirmed it just makes the most sense to me so far compared to many other golden freddy theories i have seen. also obviously we’ve been misguided by ourselves since we are literally all we got to solve this games lore. i think it’s okay to be open to theory’s and even just consuming them for the fun of it
@@mafi978 2 of anything cannot occupy the same space at the same time. unless you like collisions💀 in this case it makes sense to maybe have cassidy’s body and soul in golden freddy and also crying child’s soul. if anything there’s only one body stuffed in it but 2 souls occupying. again, stitch wrathe told us this is possible so i don’t see how vip, a book about security breach, is fully relevant to this specific topic
My brain started inventing new types of flabbergastedness right at the 14:00 mark 😭
I always thought that (until fnaf 3) golden freddy was the killer himself. It just sorta made sense that in a series called "Five Nights at Freddy's" that the main killer would be freddy. And that what made the spirit haunting golden freddy so special was the fact that they were stuffed in the same suit that the killer wore. Just a little head canon i used to believe that always made a little sense to me. Amazing video btw, keep up the good work! :]
Edit: oh and i forgot to mention that Golden freddy's titular phrase is "it's me" maybe pointing to "it's me the killer"
Doesn't really matter anymore since William used the springbonnie suit but it's a fun thought experiment!
The Fact that Phone Guy specifically mentions a yellow suit in the back room was moved in Fnaf 2 really made me think Golden Freddy was originally supposed to be the killing suit. It was the only yellow suit in the series at the time that wasn't Chica.
@@NotUlpoadingAnything yes I totally agree!
"I always thought that (until fnaf 3) golden freddy was the killer himself. It just sorta made sense that in a series called "Five Nights at Freddy's" that the main killer would be freddy. And that what made the spirit haunting golden freddy so special was the fact that they were stuffed in the same suit that the killer wore. Just a little head canon i used to believe that always made a little sense to me. Amazing video btw, keep up the good work! :]"
This is true though, the killer used both Golden Freddy and Spring Bonnie suits.
@@NotUlpoadingAnything "The Fact that Phone Guy specifically mentions a yellow suit in the back room was moved in Fnaf 2 really made me think Golden Freddy was originally supposed to be the killing suit. It was the only yellow suit in the series at the time that wasn't Chica."
Both were used.
Personally, I really love Dual Process Theory's interpretation, mainly because it's so narratively satisfying, but you do make some good points. Guess we're just gonna be chasing this one around the mulberry bush forever.
3:32 “nowhere near the fredbear suit”
*shows an image of CC being inside of Fredbear’s mouth*
11:37 That brief silence with the beatdrop was clean
True.
I appreciate that repeat yourself in the video. Every time you give an answer and reach a conclusion you summarize what you've said before moving onto the next topic.
It really helps the viewer understand, thank you for doing this
"I appreciate that repeat yourself in the video. Every time you give an answer and reach a conclusion you summarize what you've said before moving onto the next topic.
It really helps the viewer understand, thank you for doing this"
I agree, it's really helpful, and nice.
I solved the retcon. It’s Golden Freddy MCI.
Golden Freddy was originally the suit used for the MCI, but then the twist of FNAF 3 is that it’s primary antagonist is the actual killer who used the golden Bonnie suit.
That’s why the retcon was seemless, it was a twist. Watch the videos from FNAF 1 and 2 and everyone will say GF was the suit used to cause the MCI. Now 100% of the community knows it was Springtrap. Remember, the one piece of evidence that GF was the MCI suit was “There was a spare suit in the back, a yellow one. Someone used it.”
That also explains how the retcon was done before the Reddit post, which was prior to FNAF 6 came out. That game was the one that revealed that Puppet was a girl and that “Save HIM” referred to the puppet, not the spirit.
The timing of the post means the retcon needs to be between FNAF 2 and FNAF SL (as FNAF 1 can’t retcon FNAF 1)
Edit: as Piggehh pointed out below, GF doesn’t start attacking the player until the same night where “there was a suit in the back, a yellow one” was used for either the MCI, DCI, or just one murder (Cassidy?). This means “the yellow suit” HAD to have been GF, as that implication is extremely obvious, as there was only one yellow suit in the lore at that time.
I can actually see this being the case
that's unlikely to be true because there were still 5 victims and we know from FNAF 2 that the 5th was golden freddy. So Golden Freddy was the suit that killed them AND the 5th kid? Golden Bonnie just makes more sense, and given the fact that FNAF 3 only came out 3-4 months after FNAF 2, it's kinda unlikely Scott didn't have the idea for Golden Bonnie in his head already, especially because Shadow Bonnie exists. It's not a bad theory AT ALL though
We were never told what type of suit was used, just that it was yellow. Golden Freddy was our only option back then but Scott probably planned for a yellow bonnie variant by that point.
I don't think this was the retcon but good idea
@@DaDaPieGaming
What is stopping pre-FNAF 3 theorists from assuming that the body was not hidden in GF, or that the GF suit was used and the body was stuffed after the killer left the suit?
@@SaggyWaggy-is8it
That’s the thing though: the retcon was so seamless that no one noticed and he never needed to clarify it (his words in the post are something like that).
FNAF 1 was supposed to be the FINAL game he ever made. There’s no way he was planning FNAF 3 whenever he was working on his “last” game. The killer in F1 was disguised as a character and lured children away, but the animatronic suits are full of things that will kill you if you’re inside them. Thus, the final suit is slumped over, showing how it doesn’t have the internals necessary to transport itself. This means the only option for the MCI suit in FNAF 1 was either Golden Freddy, or a fur suit/costume that was never mentioned.
15:29 can you imagine the casting director looking for a kid to play Cassidy, and had that photo for reference 😂
Scott probably just used the ORIGINAL image.
Awesome theory John, really takes me back to the good old time when theories were simple, effective and easy to follow. You’ve got a lot of nice catchs in this one and several mind blowing moments. Loved the reflection of the happiest day part. Very entertaining to watch, good job man! Keep the amazing work!
Heard Astralspiff talking about this video, John literally called him like at 2AM about the lore. 😂
About ONE specific detail that he realized blew the lid open on the FNAF lore. I can't wait to find out
"About ONE specific detail that he realized blew the lid open on the FNAF lore. I can't wait to find out"
I wonder what it is...
The Remnant lake in RUIN?
13:40 literally gasped
SAME
IT DOES NOT LOOK THE SAME ONLY THE ROOM SHAPE IS THE SAME I DONT GET IT
It's not 1 for 1, but I feel it looks enough the same that it feels intenional.
I truly believe Scott rarely does things like that arbitrarily.
SAME BRO
@@risefingerboard515Fredbear masked kid looking in front of The marionette, Freddy, Bonnie, chica, and foxy masked children, does not ring a bell?
loved how this video was presented (that being game release order rather then chronologically)
ive been on and off in the fan base for like 2 years and only occasionally look into the lore now but this video was structured in such an informing way i wasnt confused at any part, please make more like this!
"loved how this video was presented (that being game release order rather then chronologically)"
It's the best way to go to be fair.
"ive been on and off in the fan base for like 2 years and only occasionally look into the lore now but this video was structured in such an informing way i wasnt confused at any part, please make more like this!"
Exactly.
I always love watching your theories, the way you use logic and connect the dots so coherently without stretching makes it feel like it all connects together so well and that there is a pattern we can follow to figure out the rest of the lore.
If this is true it would litterly explain why in fnaf 3's bad ending both eyes were lit up even though 2 spirits possessed Golden Freddy bcs Cassidy possesses the head. Nice theory!
I agree.
12:30 I think it's straaange because crying child was killed by the head and murder victim was likely put inside body but whatevaa😅
Been waiting for another theory from you. I love your takes on the lore, no matter how crazy they might be
Yeah, they're pretty fun, even if I don't agree.
NAHHH the gluing over the picture is the most creative thing ever, but you explain everything in a way that makes things feel so simple
My mind was BLOWN upon watching this video. This is definitely my favourite fnaf theory video, it's so AMAZING.
DUDE! I absolutely love your videos! Please never stop! I always look forward to you posting another! ❤
What’s in the box? It’s the pieces put together. I think that what was in the box was supposed to be CC’s Foxy plush. I think this because CC’s Foxy plush is literally without its head. It is in pieces. It is Michael’s repressed memories of tormenting his brother. It’s why he wears a Foxy mask, to taunt his brother over what he did to one of his friends. I think that eventually, Michael opens the box (which we see in FNAF World) and puts the plush back together, which is why in the FNAF 4 gameplay we see the plush in the closet as whole, not without its head. The only way Michael would have been able to help the other children is to first confront what he did to his brother. This is why Happiest Day resembles CC’s birthday at Fredbear’s, not because we are releasing CC, but because Michael is using those memories he finally put back together to help the spirits currently trapped. I think the reason Scott chose to forget (or more aptly, not follow up on) what was in the box, was because he felt that Michael’s arc of confronting his past was not clear enough, and so he created Sister Location. Sister Location shows us Michael trying to atone for past mistakes by putting his sister back together, and shows us that Michael holds a grudge against his father. I do think Scott eventually gave the role of freeing the spirits to Henry rather than Michael though, because we didn’t understand what Scott meant with the box.
We know that we play as the same character in the first four FNAF games because the Mike and Fritz get fired for the same reason, the night guard in FNAF 3 has seen animatronics that you could only see at the FNAF 2 location (Withered Golden Freddy, Mangle, etc), and the character we play as in FNAF 4 hears audio from one of the FNAF 1 phone calls in reverse. The character from FNAF 4 also has purple toys of a fan, a robot, and a phone, which not only indicate he is a security guard, but also that he has a connection to Purple Guy (William Afton), as the only toys that are purple are the ones relevant to him being a security guard. Scott also hinted that we played as Michael when in the GT livestream, he asked “Have you thought about who the security guard is?” and “four games, one story” on his website. It’s possible Scott was trying to tell us that Michael was dreaming of the FNAF 4 mini-games too, as Mangle should not exist in 1983, if Mangle had a toy it would be Funtime Foxy, not Mangle. Scott drew attention to Toy Chica’s missing beak as a way to get us to look at the other toys, specifically Foxy, and why the Foxy plush is missing its head.
I also think it’s possible that the reason that The Silver Eyes trilogy places such an emphasis on Theodore, the Ella doll and closets, was to point us in the right direction.
I know none of this is really relevant I just wanted to share.
Technically speaking, there is nothing in the box anymore-hell, the box doesn't even exist now. Scott told Dawko that the idea of what he wanted to be in the box no longer fits into the current narrative, so we shouldn't waste our time on it anymore.
I like this theory, but Scott abandoned the box, an that makes you thing he tried to represent what was in the box using SL?
This is what I’ll be believing from now on, genius !
@@grandempressvicky6387 I know nothing is in the box now, but that doesn’t mean I can’t think about what Scott had in mind when he was making it. He had something he wanted to pursue, but the story didn’t pan out that way. So by looking at how the story turned out, compared to just eh story of the first four games, we can get a better idea of what might have been in it.
@@Randombookwoorm I think Scott used Sister Location as a different kind of box. They have both portrayed (or would have) Michael confronting his past. However, Sister Location changes some of the details, by introducing Elizabeth, and having Michael be injected with remnant (memories) rather than opening the box (which we don’t even know is open, but FNAF World suggests it is). By Pizzeria Simulator, the role of “person who wants to release the children” is given to Henry as well, which I don’t think was originally the plan at all.
15:28, The character that played as the kid possessing Golden Freddy doesn’t have blonde hair, his hair was dyed to that color. But the one thing that is connected to what you just said, is that the kid who plays as that spirit has blue eyes, and when you brighten up the image for Cassidy in ultimate custom night, The eyes are blue too.
Then it was a very conscious decision to make him blonde, if anything this only strengthens his theory.
@@Limomonyeah that was what I was gonna say. That basically confirms it bc they went out of their way to make sure the child was blonde, seems pretty important
"The character that played as the kid possessing Golden Freddy doesn’t have blonde hair, his hair was dyed to that color."
Yup, he was a brown haired boy with blue eyes, and his hair was dyed blond. Who knows, this may or may not have lore significance (his hair may have been brown, but becoming Golden Freddy altered his hair colour).
"But the one thing that is connected to what you just said, is that the kid who plays as that spirit has blue eyes, and when you brighten up the image for Cassidy in ultimate custom night, The eyes are blue too."
Yes, the (not confirmed to be Cassidy) TOYSNHK image has blue eyes, not when you brighten it up, but when you put the eyes into photonegative, as they were edited with a photonegative filter, so applying it again undoes the effect.
The Crying Child in FNaF World also has blue eyes.
Also, the blond boy having blue eyes may connect to the eye colour of the Yellow Bear in the Movie.
@@Limomon "Then it was a very conscious decision to make him blonde"
Yup, it indeed was.
Kelsey is the Yellow Bear kid with blond hair and blue eyes.
@@Daydream_N "yeah that was what I was gonna say. That basically confirms it bc they went out of their way to make sure the child was blonde, seems pretty important"
Yeah, they're 99.9% TOYSNHK.
CC being bit and possessing the head would make more sense to me but who knows how possessions really work in this universe
CC never died stuck in the mouth tho.died in a hospital.
@@Deadhead-kq4hr You can't possess if ur aren't dead.
@@wutsBlanc could still end up possessing it as a passive haunting of the suit
@@Deadhead-kq4hr agony is made of anger which Cc is incapable of.
@@Deadhead-kq4hr cassidy put him back as explained in the video.
I was thinking about the idea of "the one you should not have killed". Given the happiest day minigame's connection to the crying child's death scene, could it make sense that Afton killed the four children wearing the masks as revenge for them killing his child? Then, if he stuffed them into the matching suits, that would align with the happiest day minigame. Then the "one you should not have killed", probably Cassidy, could be a random victim, or somebody innocent who Afton killed despite them not being involved in the incident at all. That would explain the vengeance of the spirit as well as the particular reason he should not have been killed. The only issue could then relate to other victims from Afton, since he'd have no motivation to do that. I like this video's theory btw, it all seems to match up very nicely
This was really good. The ONLY thing I think would've been awesome if you mentioned it (after explaining that Cassidy controls the head), is that, precisely, each time you get a jumpscare from GF is in fact, the head.
And also in UCN the GF at the end seems like it's being restricted by it's body (aka the other spirit) but this is something more subjective, it's just a detail that I like to point out.
I got chills when you brought up the movie evidence! I never noticed that in the drawing! Your theory makes complete sense from beginning to end and has me believing this too.
"I got chills when you brought up the movie evidence! I never noticed that in the drawing!"
Yup, it's been there since last year, but only a few people (including me) noticed it was there (and we were called crazy for it).
I'm glad it's out in the spotlight now, so there's more people agreeing with it.
The movie thing is a bit of a mind blown moment.
In terms of ‘how’ CC ends up in Golden Freddy, my best guess is he initially possessed the plush. What if William used the plush as part of how he lured the MCI. An inverted Funtime Freddy, a Bonnie with a small Freddy in his hand. When he had his hands full with two kids at once, he used the plush to quiet one kid while he killed the other. Lacking a place for the extra kid, he had to put them into Golden Freddy. Wild speculation of course.
It could also be William knowing the plush is haunted and trying to give CC ‘life’ by transferring it into a larger body. [maybe where his remnant studies began or were leading]
The thing I dislike about the Stitchwraith parallel is that the "lore relevant parallels" should always lead us towards already established information. When did Scott establish "two souls in Golden Freddy"? At the very latest, he did that in FNAF 4. And HOW did he do that? That's the problem I want answered.
The Logbook and Stitchwraith should expand on the concepts introduced in FNAF 4. They shouldn't be treated as PRIMARY evidence, but just a push towards evidence left in FNAF 4 (or earlier). FNAF World does that quite well because it just ties "putting back together" with FNAF 3 minigames - it's a simple connection that we've made before World was released.
In the same way, FNAF 4 makes connections between Bite Victim and Golden Freddy and it creates confusion between him and the fifth MCI victim, HOWEVER, FNAF 4 on its own says nothing that could imply that they're BOTH possessing Golden Freddy. That's my problem with this theory.
For me, ShatterVictim/MemoryVictim makes more sense. I think the connections are more symbolical. Bite Victim seems to be Golden Freddy (it's a connection with FNAF 3) but he also seems to be bite victim (of '87; it's a connection with FNAF 2) and he also has ties with Mike (connection with FNAF 1). I think he's "Golden Freddy" as much as he's Jeremy or Mike. He's connected to other games, but not in a literal way. For more elaboration, google both ShatterVictim and MemoryVictim because they're both very interesting theories.
Bite of 87 victim didn't die though? Phone guy says that it's amazing how someone can survive without a frontal lobe
@@zeldafan6124 I'm saying that Bite Victim "seems to be Golden Freddy" but he ALSO "seems to be FNAF2 Bite Victim". The point is that he is neither of them, but he is connected through a parallel to both.
I think the two souls possessing golden Freddy is established in FNAF 2 by the shadow animatronics one is more aggressive and shows in the office i.e. Shadow bonnie which I think is a stand in for the vengeful spirit she takes form as a bunny as a nod to her killer William Afton in the spring bonnie suit while shadow Freddy is the crying child who is more passive and is only confined in the parts and service room.
@@Ponguj "The thing I dislike about the Stitchwraith parallel is that the "lore relevant parallels" should always lead us towards already established information."
Exactly.
For example, Hide and Seek shows that RWQFSFASXC can hide in shadows, which allows them to control the thing or person the shadow belongs to.
This is previously shown in FNaF 4, where RWQFSFASXC is in Fredbear's shadow during the Bite of '83.
This story also has instances of where RWQFSFASXC stops hiding in their shadow, and stays where the actual shadow was a few moments ago.
This same thing happens in FNaF 4, where an employee wears Fredbear in FNaF 4, but RWQFSFASXC pretending to be Fredbear's shadow is still there on stage.
"When did Scott establish "two souls in Golden Freddy"?"
FNaF 1, he used a similar method that he used in the Movie, using the drawings, with it being more or less obvious.
"That's the problem I want answered."
Answered it for you.
"The Logbook and Stitchwraith should expand on the concepts introduced in FNAF 4. They shouldn't be treated as PRIMARY evidence"
Btw, to continue the Stitchwraith parallel, Andrew is killed by Fetch's jaws clamping down on his head, he then leaves a hospital in TMIR1280, and walks over to another Fetch animatronic and possesses it. The battery from this animatronic is then used in the Stitchwraith. Like Crying Child, he acts as a power source.
As for the Logbook... like how Cassidy talks directly in the Logbook, and CC uses edited text, in FNaF 1, Cassidy laughs in her own voice, while CC communicates through edited text.
They also both have a drawing they drew when alive, both saying "(It's) Me" on them in different handwriting. A girl in lower case, and a boy being watched by an animatronic in upper case.
"then that one drawing was a really solid point and solved it, 2 kids possessing 1 animatronic."
So does the drawings in FNaF 1, but the community sadly overlooked it.
"FNAF World does that quite well because it just ties "putting back together" with FNAF 3 minigames - it's a simple connection that we've made before World was released."
Yup, exactly.
There's also the connection made between Crying Child and the Shadow (puppet) in FNaF 3.
"For me, ShatterVictim/MemoryVictim makes more sense."
For me, ShadowShatterVictim makes the most sense of any theory, as it implements everything with no stone left unturned.
"I think the connections are more symbolical. Bite Victim seems to be Golden Freddy (it's a connection with FNAF 3)" And the other animatronics, as shown in FNaF 1's hallucinations.
"but he also seems to be bite victim (of '87; it's a connection with FNAF 2)"
The FNaF 4 teasers and FNaF World Mobile also suggest this.
"For more elaboration, google both ShatterVictim and MemoryVictim because they're both very interesting theories."
I'll go more in-depth with ShadowShatterVictim if you wish.
@@zeldafan6124 Meanwhile Crying Child lost his frontal lobe, but survived inside the other animatronics.
This is also the plot of The Desolate Hope, Scott's game prior to FNaF 1, where a human child survives within the code of five robots, with the fifth being a broken down one that's always sitting.
The plot of ITP also comes from Chipper and Son's, where a robot replaces the protagonist's father.
Wow incredible uncovering this!! You helping solve plus scotts way of uncovering things without directly telling us is just amazing. I love all the theories all being born and this is what keeps this community alive and thriving. And new generations loving it. Im 32 I've been watching fnaf lore for a very long time now. I have an 11 year old son who on his own got into fnaf a few years ago. It's amazing we both get to talk about lore and watch the movies and let's plays together. Love it. Scott created something so special. Plus he seems like a great guy. I love this community so much and people like you who keep it thriving!
Maybe the nitrus is actually a convoluted hint from Scott
This has actually given me an idea for the case of the Shadow animatronics. The only shadows are Freddy and Bonnie, both of which relate to Animatronics filled with hate and malice. Cassidy in GF, and Afton in SB.
We know manifestations of emotions exist in the FNaF universe, so it could be possible that both Shadow Freddy and Shadow Bonnie are manifestations of *Hatred and Malice, both representing Cassidy and Afton*
I could also just be spitballing too much here
This is a really great theory! For some additional evidence - consider that in FNAF 4 Night 4, we see what looks like a child stuck in a springlock suit, and we also see in FNAF 3 Stage 01 that there was a single child who went missing at Fredbear's. Cassidy seems to have died in a Springlock suit like Afton, which would explain why they both possess supernatural abilities and seem more in-control than the others.
Nope, because Cassidy dies in 1985. The “child” is literally wires coming out the suit. MCI83 is debunked.
I'm still not completely sold on the whole two characters thing, even after all these years. But damn that picture evidence is really good, great spot that!
Also I have a friend whom I think looks quite similar to you, and weirdly enough he was the one I went to the FNAF movie with! Just thought it was a funny coincidence worth mentioning.
"I'm still not completely sold on the whole two characters thing, even after all these years. But damn that picture evidence is really good, great spot that!"
There's also the "(It's) Me" drawings in FNaF 1. One of a boy, and we hear the voice of the other, a girl.
Crying Child also alters the text in the FNaF 1 location, and in Mike's eyes.
This interaction of direct speech and altered text is identical to how they communicate in the Logbook.
"Also I have a friend whom I think looks quite similar to you, and weirdly enough he was the one I went to the FNAF movie with! Just thought it was a funny coincidence worth mentioning."
lmao, he's a mimic.
Video starts here btw 0:01
ty
ty
ty
ty
ty
10:02 how is the question of why they are important answered by ucn? We find out they're "the one you should not have killed" but I don't think it answers why they are important? Unless it's supposed to mean theyre important because they're keeping Afton hostage in hell but it still doesn't explain why they're important enough to have that power
>but it still doesn't explain why they're important enough to have that power
Simple, Cassidy is really, REALLY fucking pissed.
Getting the most Overkill Death, then being worn around for William's second Murder Spree will do that.
Also in fnaf 2, golden freddy can become a floating head and in the jumpscare, the only part of him that appears is his head so CC in fnaf 2 was trying to hold Cassidy back, but ultimately failed after Cassidy separated the head and jumpscared the nightguard
"Also in fnaf 2, golden freddy can become a floating head and in the jumpscare, the only part of him that appears is his head"
This is due to the MCI possessing the heads of the animatronics. This is shown in Give gifts. Give life.
I'd say nice try, but it's unrelated to the actual duo evidence.
Also, it's not just the FNaF Movie drawings that suggest a duo... the game drawings do as well.
Personally, I think the little girl with Security Puppet is Charlotte before she gets killed
the girl with the green bracelet? well, yeah
I think your explanation on golden Freddy is the most logical theory we can make.
It makes with all information we can gather from the games, books and even from the movie the most sense.
Good job 🎉
the way I squeal seeing “NEED MORE PROOF?” text at 14:51 his catchline is so gold
golden freddy is kanye
Find your dreams come true
Damn right
ye
Thanks For this john! Love your content ❤❤❤❤
3:03 “in this game we got a huge chunk of lore relating to the crying child” yeah and fredbear got a huge chunk of the crying child too
That’s pretty funny dude 😂
Deserves more likes lol
I don’t think he enjoyed that kiss…
16:36 got chills, i need to rewatch fnaf movie for the 7th time
That final tie to the movie at the end made me so excited. Awesome video as always!
My big issue with the debate is always this: if Cassidy is the vengeful spirit...why? So much effort is put into explaining who Golden Freddy is, but when it comes to Cassidy (which I do think is likely) I feel nothing. So Afton's biggest threat is some random kid he killed who happened to want to torture him because...reasons? I genuinely hope future games cover this because it's bugged me for so long.
This is why I believe most of dual process theory. It's just more satisfying narratively.
@@claudiaamengualmateo6989That theory was perfect down to the last minute detail.
I think it's because Afton put Cassidy in the Golden Freddy suit in fnaf 2 and springlocked them to death. That’s what happened the day someone "used" the old yellow suit and why the restaurant was under investigation then closed. A murder disguised as a accident.
I think that's the multiple spring lock failure mentioned in fnaf 3. And why at the end of UCN Golden Freddy is twitching exactly like Springtrap was in fnaf 3. To show that he had been spring locked as well.
@@TomandJerryandSpike Except when they said Michael was the Vengful Spirit, and when they completely ignored the second entity in the logbook
@@bigking3218 Again where's the narrative? sure okay the death is brutal but who is She? What does She do? How did She end up there? Why did Afton springlock her and not the others? She has nothing to her name other than hate and it's not like with AM where the Hate is part of the irony of his character being an AI and such aswell and this is important the Guy has other stuff going for him. As for her what does she have? nothing. For crying out loud we know more about Susie than the "Protagonist" of the story. (Also narratively there is just nothing and in fact makes her even more infuriating cause you mean a background character in the first few games and a dead child of an event that happened long ago is that important to the overarching narrative of the story?)
I love how you always use Markiplier’s footage 😂😂😂
There's some context in FNaF World you left out that actually inclines me to believe Happiest Day being for the Crying Child wasn't the intended reading here.
At one point in the game, Glitch Fredbear says "You need to leave breadcrumbs for him, to help him find his way," in reference to the clocks. And at the end of the game, once you collect all the clocks & enter a secret portal, the yellow eyes tells the Crying Child "The pieces are in place for you. All you have to do is find them."
All this implies that the Crying Child isn't the one who receives Happiest Day, but instead the one who sets it up, as he's the one "finding" the Happiest Day minigames.
I think the glowing eyes are meant to be a different character than glitchbear, talking to (proably) CC. The opening cutscene repeats the "I will put you back together" line. Also, notably, only glowing eyes are visible... almost like the person they are talking to "can't see".
The player is probably either Mike or Cassidy (if you subscribe to the theory that the spirits can interact with the game world), so it's not CC who sets up happiest day, he's just being addressed in some of the cutscenes.
@@timeturnerdust6093 Why would they be different characters? Glitchbear has those same yellow eyes, and there's no indication that they're different.
The player also can't be Mike or Cassidy, since Glitchbear tells the player "You were created for one thing." The player is most likely just Adventure Freddy.
CC setting up Happiest Day is just what the text suggests. I'm just the messenger.
@@UnoriginalJokester I mean it's definitely possible that they're the same character, but I'd also argue that an 8-bit style limits how you can represent spooky glowing eyes in the dark haha. FNAF is also frustratingly vague sometimes.
I think that if they're not the same character, then they're talking to different characters in those different forms. I think that the glowing-eyes form of glitchbear is talking to CC, and in the full-body form he's talking to the player character (who I don't think is CC).
I think that CC setting up his own happiest day makes no sense. Like, he's been a super passive character this whole time and suddenly he gains the agency and ability to free his own soul? idk. Like, obviously possible but I don't find it likely.
also the "created for just one thing" thing could be referring to the player's avatar so that they can interact with the spirit/game world, but I'd have to look back for the context of the line since it's been a while since I've seen gameplay
@@timeturnerdust6093 Again, we have no reason to believe Glitchbear & the yellow eyes are separate characters. They both share the same motivation of helping CC & putting pieces in place for him, and something as simple as changing eye color wouldn't be restricted under an 8-bit style.
And yeah, regardless of if they're different characters or not, CC is only being spoken to in the intro & ending cutscenes. That's basically a guarantee.
That's the thing, though. FNaF World telling us CC set up Happiest Day means there's no proof that Happiest Day was for CC at all. They're completely different roles.
The problem there is that Glitchbear doesn't say "your avatar" or something like that. It says "YOU were created for one thing." And while FNaF can be vague sometimes, I wouldn't accuse it of being THAT misleading.
Funny thing, in a scrapped r rated script for the FNAF film, Abby's drawing had all the kids who were said/shown to be killed, but in the final film, the blonde boy is missing from the drawing, I recently theorized that maybe he and Garrett are actually one and the same somehow. Like some sort of a split personality thing. This could also apply to the crying child maybe having a split personality. Kind of like gollum and dr. Jakyll.
LOVE the find about the drawing in the movie!! Awesome detail, awesome work. Great video!
I came to the same conclusion about the movie, I don't think Garret is the Puppet.
But then why do we get the "come find me" at the end of the movie with the puppet's music box playing? Mike never got closure for his brother. You know?
@@LightningTime777 yes he did thats what the ending was about
@@LightningTime777 "But then why do we get the "come find me" "
"(Come) Find Me" is a quote associated with RWQFSFASXC/Glitchtrap in the games.
"with the puppet's music box playing?"
Have you seen the Secret Of The Mimic trailer? The music isn't exclusive to the Marionette.
The music is linked to Henry, the creator.
"Mike never got closure for his brother. You know?"
Perhaps he will, one day...
@@ender01o66 No come find me is said through a weird voice thing that is associated with the puppet in the "S A V E T H E M" minigame
0:16 golden freddy
No shit 😭
goldem freddy
Golden Freddy
Golden Freddy
0:16 golden . . .freddy
1:14 oh yeah he is speacial i mean he can't walk like the others
Random thing, i was wondering. There's probably a simple explanation that i didn't see, but with the somewhat established timeline, why would the crying child have all four plushies and fredbears family diner still exists? Im guessing there's a time overlap im missing as to where freddy and the gang also existed while fredbears was still open.
I love this theory SO MUCH
Ah it feels like you’ve put the pieces together in my mind :,,) I’ve been following this for so long!
I remember when these games came out and no one could understand why /why/ that mini game showed the masks… was it the children? Why in the bad ending does it show all the masks? Are they all at peace?
But this theory shows that we are going into the crying child’s mind and saving him, by changing his birthday! And you’re the first one I’ve seen make that connection that it’s his birthday. And that the point is to change the meaning.
I’m so excited for the next fnaf movie too omg
Put the pieces together in your mind?
Your mind is the FNAF 4 box??? /j
I think the writing in the dust in the movie confirms that garret is in Golden Freddy as well as the Cassidy stand in. There would be no point to have that there if not to say that.
"I think the writing in the dust in the movie confirms that garret is in Golden Freddy as well as the Cassidy stand in."
How so?
@@ender01o66Think about it in the context of the games. Mike is working in fnaf 1, and crying child is telling him it's me. In the movie, Mike is working in fnaf 1, and Garret is telling him it's me. It'll be a big reveal in one of the movies that Garret is possessing one of the animatronics. In my opinion there's no way they stop Garret's story at "yeah I killed him lol"
GF is possessed by some blonde kid in the movie, it's theorized that Garret is going to be the one to possess the puppet in the next movie
@@Forgottensnapdragon yeah the whole entire theory is that there are 2 kids inside golden freddy. Also what evidence is there that he's going to be the puppet?
@@DukeYeet Someone on Reddit explained it pretty well