its kinda fun to think about how these giant dinosaurs lived and and way they managed to sustain themselves on such a large scale. but how can they know the behavior of these giants?
I saw the movie ""Dionosaurus" at my friends birthday party around the late 1950s early 1960s. His grandparents were stockholders in the theater, so we got in for free. I would have never paid to see this particular movie. In one scene the T-rex was large enough to pick up, throw down, then stomp on a school bus. In another scene, presumably, the same T-rex was only large enough to pick up a grown man enough so that his feet cleared the ground.
I certainly do miss all of the dinosaurs 🦕, and I do certainly wish that I could have lived when all of them lived, and this would certainly have been a wonderful blessing to all and to me ❤😊
I would be terrified. What about the dinosaurs like T-Rex? Would they still be around? We'd need a Jurassic Park, and we all know how that movie turned out!!!!
In real life, there couldn't have been much difference in weight, between the argentinosaurus and the puertasaurus. Even the puertasaurus was around 70 tons, in my opinion.
Those were the two biggest from over 300,00 caught and measured by whalers and i believe the biggest one ever measured and verified by biologists was 29.9 meters. A 30 meter Blue Whale is the equivalent of an 8 foot human, the average full grown Blue whale is 21 to 22 meters. There probably isn't a Blue Whale alive now that is 30 meters because of how rare it is for them to reach that size.
Good video, better than 99% on youtube, good job! Still i would change minor details, some more accurate sizes and definitely dreadnaughtus would fall off the top 5 list. 8.5/10
the lengt of their tale is impressive, I try to imagine the speed the tip would reach if they used it as a giant whip, the detonation must have been supersonic, the force brought about by the speed must have ripped through anything.
I’m a firm believer most of this sauropods are the same animal just different stages of life, some young, some old, some males and some females.. 🤷🏽♂️ we’ll never know, everything is pure speculation😏
Kinda unrelated, but I took a huge dump this morning. Yesterday was 4/20 and I ate a pizza, 14 hot wings, 2 bags of funyons, a pint of ice cream, and grilled cheese with ranch dressing. Also had 2 liters of soda.
Because bruhathkayosaurus is not considered among most paleontologists to be the dimensions reported. The only evidence supporting it's size are a few drawings of the fossils that no longer exist.
one thing t-rex did that mapusaurus didnt. is drive the titanosaur's out of range. alimosaurs didnt survive in rex territory. they were driven down to modern day mexico. what did survive was probably the most dangerous herbivore to exist. triceratops. it makes sense too. a juvenile or adult t-rex could kill and eat a baby/juvenile alamosaurus titanosaur . so the breeding would have only fed the rex who would absolutely not engage healthy adults unless desperate, and if it did, the rex would have died very likely. but over time, that explains north america losing titanosaurs. and gaining triceratops hirridus.
From the first animals build i wud say it probz did use that neck to reach high vegetation coz it meks sense to do so n y wudn an animal use that neck if it had it? Plus it doesnt mean the animal had to walk around like that all the time. It wud reach up jus to bring something down n then carry on horizontally
Because they have to be unique and universal for scientist to use. And since these animals were gone long before modern times there are no vernacular names for them. Modern animals also have scientific names, for example the african elephant is Loxodonta africana, white rhino is Ceratotherium simum, blue whale is Balaenoptera musculus, humans are Homo sapiens, etc.
You can tell by the size of the bone. People been studying this they even know more then you. If you find one bone that is 18 feet long means animal probably bigger then a small lizard hah
it is almost impossible for a huge animal to be fossilized so the only thing to do is extrapolate from a more complete juvenile or a closely related species.
I wonder if someone ever found one of their stomachs to asure us that they were herbivores, and if any scientist ever thuoght about the tail being the longer part for balance instead of the neck
The end of “the age of the dinosaurs” dominated by reptilian type creatures is described in Jeremiah 4: 23-28 KJV and 2 Peter 3: 5-7. This sets up the destroyed state of earth and universe we see starting in Genesis 1:2. The rebuilt in 6 days earth and universe we know now has reptilians cursed to be crawling or slithering on their bellies. I believe the reason for that destruction was Satan/Lucifer fall described in Isiah 14: 12-17 KJV. The Bible matches with archeology when it is correctly understood vs what mainstream churches interpret it saying.
i dont where ya got your dictate but "sauris" means "flight" not lizard ...it goes with the english word of "sore" aka "soar" and "sar" as in ce'sar \dino; means "big eater" aka "dine oh" simple double expression of "oh" hints "big flyers" but many use the word "dinosaur" to be simpler as "old animals" because it includes the smaller and for date proximaty... probly better spoken "di'noster'is" as "big, old, known," ie from the "big old times" \"di" like as "de" speach is simple "of" and "noster" from "knowelege" rhymetic link of "nose" vs "knows" ie ge'nos'is but "sauris" is basicly "bird like" ie from "sor" and as t-rex was most famous and yet "bird like" in shape... if ya wanted to say "lizard like" dig closer to original "serpant" otherwise "nephilm" is the only biblical word that fits the acro name of [_not _exactly _people _haveing _incredable _large _mandibles ] which fits to most dino period animals descriptions..but key note does that mean the writers of old knew regular modern english way back then? imposible if ya think only people writt vs god inspired knew even the future lingos to called it exactly what fits best...
also note sauropods are snake like theres no proof they actualy stood or upheld their necks or walked like elephants but slithering like big anacondas hides the big fat belly but snake like is the more promenant creaturel shape.. later developing legs is our worst idea as snakes that could later run but even dogs eat grasses to settle stomach issues so diet contents cant always proove as main diet being vegetation just big mouths that happen to get alota vegitation when snaping at a smaller creature big and fast would be noisey yet big and slow makes sneaky the bigger animals become hush babies cuz it avoides trouble and gets them more but nothing prooves they roamed like giraffs holding necks up even elephants mostly only hang and dangle their noses even though they can reach higher places but not everything stretches its fuller muscels unless it has too ...but also it can explain biblical curse "to crawl on their bellies" ie they might have rose become too dangerous with legs then declined for their habitual behavior as back to snake like features ie possibly earlier genetic manipulations but i dont beleive poof apearance of ideots either where ever we came from nore do i think we stayed ignorent but rises and falls shows calamity can pretty well whipe out most traces of a species and declines can make ideocey and few traces can show there was genious beings long ago as if we been through the jurassic shows before and theres usualy deeper lodgic for hints of changeing a creature...as clue that its been done and was doable...otherwise its just clue that it aplies to everything that eats anything basicly survives on its belly ...yet both can apply to say we had that kinda intelegence before id just say its all simply juggeling whats there...and idk
How could there be much disagreement about the size of dinosaurs? The skeletal remains reveal quite a lot of info - It's stupid to show those sauropods on land when they spent most of their time in water. They needed water to help support their weight, and it was a safe space away from predators.
Many dinosaurs are known from fragmentary remains, sometimes a single or even a partial bone. This is the reason why some estimates vary because if you don't know the proportions of the said dinosaurs you can't be 100% certain about the length or weight even when you use close relatives for the calculations. Essentially different methods give different results for such dinosaurs. Sauropods didn't need water to support their weight. Their bodies are extremely pneumatised and they weighted far less than they would have otherwise. Their bones are hollow and filled with airsacks which also extends through different parts of the body. They literally wouldn't be able so sink if they go in the water and would instead float because of their low body density. Plus they already have a great defense against predators which is their size. The biggest sauropods would be for the most part safe from any contemporary predator. Even in group, attacking a creature 10 times your own body mass is usually not worth the risk especially when there would almost certainly be safer options.
@@Andrey.Ivanov - Do facts and science somehow change? NO. Sauropods were NOT land animals which spent most of their time on land. The problem with current day lines of reasoning is that we somehow determine a hell of a lot of conclusions based on extremely little actual information and firm facts. Standing in water hardly means standing ON water. Sauropods were not aquatic animals, and their feet were still on the ground even when their body may have been half way under water.
@@JPOG7TV Less than 1% of all the dinosaur species that ever lived left any fossil examples. And even of the very few species we have found, what are the odds we found the largest of that species? So, it’s ridiculous and anti-scientific to claim any species is the largest, longest, hardest, smallest, etc. “that ever lived.”
The "cartoon", WALKING WITH DINOSAURS will make you dumber. Hold a broom on the extreme end in one hand. First vertically, then lower it horizontally. Saying a long necked animal like a giraffe walking with its head close to the ground is too dumb.
What actual "science" is this video based on? And which complete facts? Is it mostly just a bunch of semi-educated guesses? Some of the dinosaurs mentioned are very well known, but others seem to be rather new discoveries.
Its almost like they discover new species because, I don't know, maybe its THEIR JOB to do so? It seems like you deny the science because your small mind cant understand it.
Think loch ness was real but they all died not from asteroid but from flood Noahs ark , ark covenant cain avenge seven fold, much more i solved in Bible
@@kakhakooh bro i feel sorry for you because if you dont believe what i say doesnt mean am wrong. you are the very person whom i will ask to prove that birds truly evolved into dinosaurs but u cant prove it. you are the ignorant blind followers who are decieved that grass didnt exist when dinosurs were alive but yet they find grass in the bellies of the dinosaurs. you are even too stupid & blind to see that man was created just take a look at the complexity of the solar system, your brain, your immune system. if you cant see that behind all that there is an intelligent designer then u are ignorant & stubborn. a car exists because someone sat down & designed it now how about the complex animals & the solar sysyem. use your mind dont let them think for u. again just because you dont believe in something doesnt mean its not true
@@Gwaithmir i dont need to grow up, i can stay young & be more knowledgeable than you. but what i can tell you is that you need to have an open mind without bias. how do you explain finding red blood cells in the tissue of the dinosaurs that supposedly died millions of years ago? that showed that the dinosaurs died out but not millions of years ago. you can deny all you want that the bible is wrong, you can deny that God didnt create the world thousands of years ago but that doesnt mean the bible is wrong or that God didnt create the world, you can also deny the evidence that shows that he created the world but that doesnt mean that the evidence is not there.
The Earth was rotating much slower then and "WHAM" the ASTEROID Hit at a glancing BLOW witch sped the rotation of the EARTH up faster, creating stronger GRAVITY Killing Everything heaver than 50 pounds, So if the cave MAN had several children under 50 pounds, they would populate the world!! ( INBRED??)
1) Sauroposeidon 4:50
2) Dreadnoughtus schrani 11:17
3) Patagotitan 17:24
4) Puertasaurs 21:28
5) Agrentinosaurus 27:46
6) Mapusaurus 32:40
I wish we had a few roaming around now. They would be great to see.
They are on some planet in our solar system so in time we will be filming them!!
Great video, I remember in the the 90s brachiosaurus was the largest known dinosaur ,but now its not ewen in the top 5 !
its kinda fun to think about how these giant dinosaurs lived and and way they managed to sustain themselves on such a large scale. but how can they know the behavior of these giants?
I mean the "closest" animal behavior we have is giraffes when it comes to saurpods
I saw the movie ""Dionosaurus" at my friends birthday party around the late 1950s early 1960s. His grandparents were stockholders in the theater, so we got in for free. I would have never paid to see this particular movie. In one scene the T-rex was large enough to pick up, throw down, then stomp on a school bus. In another scene, presumably, the same T-rex was only large enough to pick up a grown man enough so that his feet cleared the ground.
I certainly do miss all of the dinosaurs 🦕, and I do certainly wish that I could have lived when all of them lived, and this would certainly have been a wonderful blessing to all and to me ❤😊
I would be terrified. What about the dinosaurs like T-Rex? Would they still be around? We'd need a Jurassic Park, and we all know how that movie turned out!!!!
thumbnail , t-Rex chatting with humon - dam , that thing is huge
In real life, there couldn't have been much difference in weight, between the argentinosaurus and the puertasaurus.
Even the puertasaurus was around 70 tons, in my opinion.
For sure..
The longest blue whales are up to 33.4 meters long which is 109.58 feet ! Two females caught by whalers were 33.4 meters long !
Those were the two biggest from over 300,00 caught and measured by whalers and i believe the biggest one ever measured and verified by biologists was 29.9 meters. A 30 meter Blue Whale is the equivalent of an 8 foot human, the average full grown Blue whale is 21 to 22 meters. There probably isn't a Blue Whale alive now that is 30 meters because of how rare it is for them to reach that size.
I wonder who decided that dinosaurs roared? I thinks it would have been more like what crocodilians do or chirping sounds like birds.
his name is Steven Spielberg. He decided
Good video, better than 99% on youtube, good job! Still i would change minor details, some more accurate sizes and definitely dreadnaughtus would fall off the top 5 list. 8.5/10
Very well video. Used sauropods as largest land animals ever existed instead of just going on popular carnivore theropods
such a good and interesting video.
Great video. Support your channel!
the lengt of their tale is impressive, I try to imagine the speed the tip would reach if they used it as a giant whip, the detonation must have been supersonic, the force brought about by the speed must have ripped through anything.
I’m a firm believer most of this sauropods are the same animal just different stages of life, some young, some old, some males and some females.. 🤷🏽♂️ we’ll never know, everything is pure speculation😏
i love u and ur dino facts !
Great show!!
Kinda unrelated, but I took a huge dump this morning. Yesterday was 4/20 and I ate a pizza, 14 hot wings, 2 bags of funyons, a pint of ice cream, and grilled cheese with ranch dressing. Also had 2 liters of soda.
Someone had a good time lol
Too bad that you didn't leave out the first sentence...
😂
Here you go *attention*
Forgot the most important the bitcoin halving took place 🎉
Of all the dinosaurs above, my favorite is dreadnoughtus. What about you?
what if we got it all wrong and sauropods were actually strict carnivores.
You forgot bruhathkayosaurus
🤔 interesting??
Because bruhathkayosaurus is not considered among most paleontologists to be the dimensions reported. The only evidence supporting it's size are a few drawings of the fossils that no longer exist.
@@swampmonster4935 that’s not true at all there is photo evidence and a actual paper on the animal.
you should write a blog, lol😂
i could do what t-rex couldnt. and beat one in a fist fight.
school was just a waste of time. all what we were taught was about 5 kinds of dinasaour and learned about none of these.
💯
people who loves sauropods
So technicly sauroposeidon is the largest jurassic dinosaur ?
Chapters please
1) Sauroposeidon 4:50
2) Dreadnoughtus schrani 11:17
3) Patagotitan 17:24
4) Puertasaurs 21:28
5) Agrentinosaurus 27:46
6) Mapusaurus 32:40
The thumbnail is me and my dad
one thing t-rex did that mapusaurus didnt. is drive the titanosaur's out of range. alimosaurs didnt survive in rex territory. they were driven down to modern day mexico. what did survive was probably the most dangerous herbivore to exist. triceratops. it makes sense too. a juvenile or adult t-rex could kill and eat a baby/juvenile alamosaurus titanosaur . so the breeding would have only fed the rex who would absolutely not engage healthy adults unless desperate, and if it did, the rex would have died very likely. but over time, that explains north america losing titanosaurs. and gaining triceratops hirridus.
From the first animals build i wud say it probz did use that neck to reach high vegetation coz it meks sense to do so n y wudn an animal use that neck if it had it? Plus it doesnt mean the animal had to walk around like that all the time. It wud reach up jus to bring something down n then carry on horizontally
why are dinasour names and time perlod so complex? its just hard to remember
Because they have to be unique and universal for scientist to use. And since these animals were gone long before modern times there are no vernacular names for them. Modern animals also have scientific names, for example the african elephant is Loxodonta africana, white rhino is Ceratotherium simum, blue whale is Balaenoptera musculus, humans are Homo sapiens, etc.
skill issue
Language seperates the elites from the commoners to show their superiority.
Moore Maria Lopez Steven Garcia Mark
Fish
Wonder what those giant dinosaurs ate?
Plants
We found one bone , let's create a whole new species with a bunch of inflated statistics ...
You can tell by the size of the bone. People been studying this they even know more then you. If you find one bone that is 18 feet long means animal probably bigger then a small lizard hah
it is almost impossible for a huge animal to be fossilized so the only thing to do is extrapolate from a more complete juvenile or a closely related species.
Clearly you know more than the scientists lmao
@@JPOG7TV bro thinks he's a scientist 🧐
I wonder if someone ever found one of their stomachs to asure us that they were herbivores, and if any scientist ever thuoght about the tail being the longer part for balance instead of the neck
They have. Theres fossils of it
mayo family lol
How did they sleep
Probably while standing and for short intervals through the day. Similar to what giraffes and some other animals do. That's my guess atleast
Like bats
Job , in the bible , saw a Behemoth , aka known as Brontosaurus .
I'm not sure if Job saw it, but without a doubt, it was the creature God was describing.
Lame.
The end of “the age of the dinosaurs” dominated by reptilian type creatures is described in Jeremiah 4: 23-28 KJV and 2 Peter 3: 5-7. This sets up the destroyed state of earth and universe we see starting in Genesis 1:2. The rebuilt in 6 days earth and universe we know now has reptilians cursed to be crawling or slithering on their bellies. I believe the reason for that destruction was Satan/Lucifer fall described in Isiah 14: 12-17 KJV. The Bible matches with archeology when it is correctly understood vs what mainstream churches interpret it saying.
Behemoth was an elephant
@@JPOG7TV no it was not. People could kill elephants back then.
❤
👍
The largest dinosaur that has been discovered recently is the Bruhathkayosaurus Matleyi. It's larger than the Blue whale.
Nope bruhathkayosaurus I'd much bigger than the argentinasourus
false
They're all the same. Red thumb.
He literally explains how they are all different, are you deaf?
i dont where ya got your dictate but "sauris" means "flight" not lizard ...it goes with the english word of "sore" aka "soar" and "sar" as in ce'sar \dino; means "big eater" aka "dine oh" simple double expression of "oh" hints "big flyers" but many use the word "dinosaur" to be simpler as "old animals" because it includes the smaller and for date proximaty... probly better spoken "di'noster'is" as "big, old, known," ie from the "big old times" \"di" like as "de" speach is simple "of" and "noster" from "knowelege" rhymetic link of "nose" vs "knows" ie ge'nos'is but "sauris" is basicly "bird like" ie from "sor" and as t-rex was most famous and yet "bird like" in shape... if ya wanted to say "lizard like" dig closer to original "serpant" otherwise "nephilm" is the only biblical word that fits the acro name of [_not _exactly _people _haveing _incredable _large _mandibles ] which fits to most dino period animals descriptions..but key note does that mean the writers of old knew regular modern english way back then? imposible if ya think only people writt vs god inspired knew even the future lingos to called it exactly what fits best...
also note sauropods are snake like theres no proof they actualy stood or upheld their necks or walked like elephants but slithering like big anacondas hides the big fat belly but snake like is the more promenant creaturel shape.. later developing legs is our worst idea as snakes that could later run but even dogs eat grasses to settle stomach issues so diet contents cant always proove as main diet being vegetation just big mouths that happen to get alota vegitation when snaping at a smaller creature big and fast would be noisey yet big and slow makes sneaky the bigger animals become hush babies cuz it avoides trouble and gets them more but nothing prooves they roamed like giraffs holding necks up even elephants mostly only hang and dangle their noses even though they can reach higher places but not everything stretches its fuller muscels unless it has too ...but also it can explain biblical curse "to crawl on their bellies" ie they might have rose become too dangerous with legs then declined for their habitual behavior as back to snake like features ie possibly earlier genetic manipulations but i dont beleive poof apearance of ideots either where ever we came from nore do i think we stayed ignorent but rises and falls shows calamity can pretty well whipe out most traces of a species and declines can make ideocey and few traces can show there was genious beings long ago as if we been through the jurassic shows before and theres usualy deeper lodgic for hints of changeing a creature...as clue that its been done and was doable...otherwise its just clue that it aplies to everything that eats anything basicly survives on its belly ...yet both can apply to say we had that kinda intelegence before id just say its all simply juggeling whats there...and idk
Nice SYFI video. Don't get me wrong, dinosaurs did exist.
Harris Jessica Moore Jason Wilson Amy
How could there be much disagreement about the size of dinosaurs? The skeletal remains reveal quite a lot of info -
It's stupid to show those sauropods on land when they spent most of their time in water.
They needed water to help support their weight, and it was a safe space away from predators.
Many dinosaurs are known from fragmentary remains, sometimes a single or even a partial bone. This is the reason why some estimates vary because if you don't know the proportions of the said dinosaurs you can't be 100% certain about the length or weight even when you use close relatives for the calculations. Essentially different methods give different results for such dinosaurs. Sauropods didn't need water to support their weight. Their bodies are extremely pneumatised and they weighted far less than they would have otherwise. Their bones are hollow and filled with airsacks which also extends through different parts of the body. They literally wouldn't be able so sink if they go in the water and would instead float because of their low body density. Plus they already have a great defense against predators which is their size. The biggest sauropods would be for the most part safe from any contemporary predator. Even in group, attacking a creature 10 times your own body mass is usually not worth the risk especially when there would almost certainly be safer options.
@@Andrey.Ivanov - Do facts and science somehow change? NO. Sauropods were NOT land animals which spent most of their time on land. The problem with current day lines of reasoning is that we somehow determine a hell of a lot of conclusions based on extremely little actual information and firm facts.
Standing in water hardly means standing ON water. Sauropods were not aquatic animals, and their feet were still on the ground even when their body may have been half way under water.
BS right from the start Dinos only been around since 1842 Thats when Dick came up with the name.
Blue whale is the heaviest animal, not the largest.
“It’s also the largest animal that has ever lived.” (01:55)
Prove it.
The largest animal is the blue whale to have ever lived
@@christopherburnham1612
Guess that wraps it up.
more like that we know of
They measured it lmao what do you want
@@JPOG7TV
Less than 1% of all the dinosaur species that ever lived left any fossil examples. And even of the very few species we have found, what are the odds we found the largest of that species?
So, it’s ridiculous and anti-scientific to claim any species is the largest, longest, hardest, smallest, etc. “that ever lived.”
The "cartoon", WALKING WITH DINOSAURS will make you dumber. Hold a broom on the extreme end in one hand. First vertically, then lower it horizontally. Saying a long necked animal like a giraffe walking with its head close to the ground is too dumb.
Walking with dinosaurs was an amazing documentary and taught us all. I hope you see the real light one day 🤷🏻♂️🤦♂️🙈🤔
@@johngreystone I worked 28 years as a Paleontologist.
@@thatbeme Yet your reasoning doesn't sound like it was written by one
The numbers mean so little when said in both metric & whatever you call the American measurements.
🤔 interesting??
What actual "science" is this video based on? And which complete facts?
Is it mostly just a bunch of semi-educated guesses?
Some of the dinosaurs mentioned are very well known, but others seem to be rather new discoveries.
Its almost like they discover new species because, I don't know, maybe its THEIR JOB to do so?
It seems like you deny the science because your small mind cant understand it.
Think loch ness was real but they all died not from asteroid but from flood Noahs ark , ark covenant cain avenge seven fold, much more i solved in Bible
The bible is a comic book writteby drunk monks.
That's how you started out with the saddest JW moment? Not with the happy JP introduction?
Yesterday, a cat jumped on a box.
What a joke....Fake A.F.
God created the universe about 7000 years ago not billions of yours ago. & birds are birds not desendants of dinosaurs
Lol, insane ignorant nonsense.
@@kakhakooh bro i feel sorry for you because if you dont believe what i say doesnt mean am wrong. you are the very person whom i will ask to prove that birds truly evolved into dinosaurs but u cant prove it. you are the ignorant blind followers who are decieved that grass didnt exist when dinosurs were alive but yet they find grass in the bellies of the dinosaurs. you are even too stupid & blind to see that man was created just take a look at the complexity of the solar system, your brain, your immune system. if you cant see that behind all that there is an intelligent designer then u are ignorant & stubborn. a car exists because someone sat down & designed it now how about the complex animals & the solar sysyem. use your mind dont let them think for u. again just because you dont believe in something doesnt mean its not true
@@naijukaedgar843 The fossil record and radiometric dating prove that you're wrong. Grow up and get an education!
@@Gwaithmir i dont need to grow up, i can stay young & be more knowledgeable than you. but what i can tell you is that you need to have an open mind without bias. how do you explain finding red blood cells in the tissue of the dinosaurs that supposedly died millions of years ago? that showed that the dinosaurs died out but not millions of years ago. you can deny all you want that the bible is wrong, you can deny that God didnt create the world thousands of years ago but that doesnt mean the bible is wrong or that God didnt create the world, you can also deny the evidence that shows that he created the world but that doesnt mean that the evidence is not there.
God runs on His own schedule, not ours. Who's to say that 7,000 of God's years don't equal 4.5 billion of OUR years?
It's a matter of perspective.
Anyone who thinks those giant sauropods lived on land is seriously lacking in basic intelligence.
The Earth was rotating much slower then and "WHAM" the ASTEROID Hit at a glancing BLOW witch sped the rotation of the EARTH up faster, creating stronger GRAVITY Killing Everything heaver than 50 pounds, So if the cave MAN had several children under 50 pounds, they would populate the world!! ( INBRED??)
Evolution 🤣