Extinct. This is so cool. By the way, I have difficulty communicating because I had a stroke in Broca’s area, the part of the brain that controls speech. 2/8/2021 but I lived again. (My wife helped me compose this.)
@@TheaSvendsen @Thea Svendsen I am "THE" true nature program watcher. I just found funny that when I was thinking to myself "what an annoying narrator" I read Fredrik's comment and felt complied to reply. But hey... I completely respect your opinion. Mine remains the same though ! 😉😃
I’m very fascinated by this early period of the age of reptiles. It is a confusing mess of near dinosaurs along with true dinosaurs. All seemed to hang in the balance, but out of it came the dinosaurs, one way or another. I find it so fascinating how so many different branches of reptiles existed at this time, and all seemed very similar in so many ways, and different in their own ways too. I love how out of this, already diverse group of reptiles, came the archosaurs which also diversified, and out of that diversification came the dinosaurs, who would themselves again diversify in their ascension. The age of reptiles truly fascinates me. I always think about how for hundreds of millions of years, aliens who might have visited us, would have considered Earth to be a reptilian planet. And if they came back now, they’d be like, “What happened to all the giant reptiles??” Lol!
Liked this. Better just ot see what these animals may have looked like in artistic impressions than all the theories that overload much of the material on past life. I just like to see amazing life forms in all their variety and this video give a lot most on Jurassic life than I have seen yet. Thanks. For me this is pretty much perfect for viewing of past life. Love to see more on previous plant life too as there really isn't all that much out in media
Ignoring the egregious error of the title, it's nice to see a documentary on the early Mesozoic that isn't dinosaur centric. Because they did become the dominant group of animals in that time period, they gave rise to the birds, and their abrupt demise at the hands of the Chixulub meteor, the dinosaurs tend to hog the limelight to the point that we forget there were other creatures around when they first emerged. Yet, although these almost forgotten creatures are called reptiles, quite a number of them are more closely related to us. Either way, its nice to see a video about them!
"Ignoring the egregious error of the title" - what error? "Chixulub meteor" - asteroid, not meteor " the dinosaurs tend to hog the limelight to the point that we forget there were other creatures around when they first emerged. Yet, although these almost forgotten creatures are called reptiles, quite a number of them are more closely related to us" - if the animals referred to _are_ in fact reptiles (I don't know which you are talking about), then NO, NONE of them are more closely related to us than to dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are reptiles too, we are not. That alone rubbishes your statement.
I find these programs so comforting. Our planet and the life on it has existed an unimaginably long time before us. It will be here long after we are gone.
"A Basil Tortoise with Jagged Shell & Spiny Neck & Head", sounds like a Alligator Snapping Turtle to me, the standard Snapping Turtle is equally dangerous & can carry these traits also
@@davidsheckler4450 oh so you're a thicko then. Where is your proof to the contrary? I trust you have some verified papers from verified sources? No? Thought not. Thicko.
@@MahmWithThePlan "Verified papers" 😅🤣😂😅🤣😂😅🤣😂 that's absolutely ridiculous. Anyone can print up "verified papers " That means absolutely nothing. Unless you were there & can physically prove that you only have a "belief" which is fine you can believe anything you want. Care to share any fake-a-saurs selfies you might have taken? 🤔🤷 Thought not Jurassic Park lover. You've only established that you choose to believe unproven hearsay. I don't need "verified papers" 😅🤣😅😂🤣😅 what a ridiculous Sheeple statement. The fact that there isn't any REAL AND LEGITIMATE evidence anywhere is all that I need...unless again you have physical evidence which we both know don't 👍
If scientist prove synapsids and reptiles are different class of animals, means Triassic is the age of Synapsids because the dominant animals in the Triassic Period is synapsids and the synapsids loses dominance during late Triassic.
I really really love this. Thanks so much for making this. I will like and subscribe! But I have to say something… That thing looks nothing like a kangaroo!! 😭😭 19:35
@@WokeandProud You're assuming "facts" based on hearsay. You have zero physical evidence. You can't verify or corroborate anything. "Believing" isn't evidence
@@davidsheckler4450The evidence says otherwise ill side with the raw data and the scientific consensus your argument from ignorance and incredulity mean nothing reality doesn't care about your feelings and neither do I.
When you say unlike nothing else, that is essentially using a double negative. It's the equivalent of saying like everything else what you should be saying is unlike anything else I'm pretty sure the meaning behind that was intended to be that it was unique, so unlike anything else would be the appropriate way to state that
😂 You remind me of myself. Double negatives were my late wife’s only grammatical errors. (She couldn’t hardly get it.) 😅 This seems like an actual person’s voice. I’m more forgiving if I get the courtesy of a real voice. But a poorly written script by a non-native speaker using an AI can irk me.
@@martinphilip8998 You'd probably absolutely love my mother and her frequent use of irregardless. lol. I've actually heard that from other people but I hear it from her the most often although technically it is not grammatically correct, Especially when she uses it in a context where she actually means to say regardless. i'm not grammar police, but there are certain things that irk me from time to time especially when they are repeated errors. A lot of us use improper grammar especially when speaking informally, but certain things just tend to stick out like a sore thumb.
@@amandamatheny3675 Lol, I probably would love your mother. I’m just 70 year old boy. I had a career teaching gifted elementary students and modeled language. Lexicographers and grammarians would tell us that language is malleable and changes over time. To them I would ask, why then did my English teachers humiliate me for 5 years? Jess sayin’. Lol.
You mean that there wasn't always a USA? The countries are usually mentioned as a reference for where the remains of different animals were found in the present day.
The narration for this is beyond irritating. The speech is so slow and the voice sounds AI generated. The content is very interesting, it's just presented in a mind-numbing way.
I'm calling BULLSHIT on saying #Africa has the world's last #megafauna; the #IndianSubcontinent and the various islands of #Malayasia/#Indonesia still harbour various species of rhino and Asian elephants, which I assume are both big enough to qualify...?
This guys uses so many superlatives in introducing various creatures it's difficult to take him seriously on them. Seems like every other creature is introduced as the "strangest" or the "most remarkable." Not every animal can be the strangest, only one can - else you rob any meaning from using a superlative.
Yeah, oddly there was an ancient ocean cutting through North America from the Hudson Bay to the Golf of Mexico. Bones of ancient sea life are found all the time in Montana to Minnesota.
Actually they do know how periods begin & end. They're the ones who named the periods & why they changed from one to another. Science doesn't work on just hypothesis. The periods you're eluding to are made of rock, & easy for 'them' to age it. These rock layers might have fossils in & they're the same age as the rock they're in. "They're" (science) not lying or exaggerating anything.
@@michealtaylor7745 they made up periods because no humans were alive to back up literally any fact that they claim,. (To an exstent) obviously we know of these periods but still when they ended and begun there is simply no way to know
@@michealtaylor7745 not saying really that anyone's wrong but the fact that it's near impossible to know something that we simply can't know for a fact that humans did not exist we are only really guessing
Drepanosaurus, in my theory/opinion, may have been a representative of the Mesozoic’s equivalent of ‘primates’ and may elude to the fact that there was a Sapient life form wandering around then, and likely before. Life desires sentience, it’s encoded in DNA of all life.
in what way is life desiring sentience?? im not saying it's impossible for a hominid-like reptile to have existed back then. But looking at animals nowadays (and the extinct ones we have discovered) none other than us and our relatives seems to have taken this path. also seeing that we are the only hominids that are alive today and the rest died out, it might be because it's not normally a beneficial path to go down and maybe we are the exception. I hope this makes sense
not saying it's impossible ofc, but it's kind of a human bias to believe our evolutionary path to be the "desired one"/end goal. when in fact much of the evidence so far seems to be saying something else
@@agathacathartese7041 nothing ‘wishy-washy’ about my statement, only your limited imagination/perception. I shouldn’t have to go into an essay about; environmental constraints, convergent evolution, homologous structures and repeating forms/body plans and roles/niches in the environment for someone to grasp my concepts. If you can’t see a Drepanosaurus potentially using it’s bizarre finger like an aye-aye, and a mirror of our existing ecosystem could have been mirrored in Cycles’ past, then I’m not trying to communicate with you. Maybe, someone with more of an understanding that the ‘more things change the more they stay the same’ Nature’s blueprint seems to have ideas all it’s own. Ichthyosaurs were essentially that Cycles’ dolphins and porpoises. Maybe, think out of the box, it’s more cozy out there when you realize we only have a small percentage of the world’s snapshot across time. Ok, pumpkin, thanks mmmm bye.
@@brockdavid nah dude, you're not thinking outside the box lol that's dumb as hell. To just invent some random scenario based on (very likely not very educated) speculation and wild leaps of logic, and then believe in it, is dumb as all hell lol
Extinct. This is so cool. By the way, I have difficulty communicating because I had a stroke in Broca’s area, the part of the brain that controls speech. 2/8/2021 but I lived again. (My wife helped me compose this.)
🙏Your wife is a big helper of yours ❤️bless you 🙏
I hope all is well with you Sir. And stay strong stay safe
Best wishes for you and your loved ones.
Your wife is awesome bro, thank you for commenting
❤❤❤
Perfect bedtime story. I like the calm voice 👍🙌🙂
he he he... I just hate it... it is so forced and unnatural... no one talks like that !
@@ruipratas83 Have you never watched a documentary about nature? Pretty much all the narrator’s sounds like this.
@@TheaSvendsen @Thea Svendsen I am "THE" true nature program watcher. I just found funny that when I was thinking to myself "what an annoying narrator" I read Fredrik's comment and felt complied to reply.
But hey... I completely respect your opinion.
Mine remains the same though ! 😉😃
@@leitaoruimfp The voice is a newer text-to-speech voice. I think that it does a good job.
I’m very fascinated by this early period of the age of reptiles. It is a confusing mess of near dinosaurs along with true dinosaurs.
All seemed to hang in the balance, but out of it came the dinosaurs, one way or another.
I find it so fascinating how so many different branches of reptiles existed at this time, and all seemed very similar in so many ways, and different in their own ways too.
I love how out of this, already diverse group of reptiles, came the archosaurs which also diversified, and out of that diversification came the dinosaurs, who would themselves again diversify in their ascension. The age of reptiles truly fascinates me.
I always think about how for hundreds of millions of years, aliens who might have visited us, would have considered Earth to be a reptilian planet. And if they came back now, they’d be like, “What happened to all the giant reptiles??” Lol!
Awww seriously raccoons 🦝 are so so cute my heart just melts for them and their little hands ❤
Raccoons are not cute. One literally killed all of my chickens and chicks
Liked this. Better just ot see what these animals may have looked like in artistic impressions than all the theories that overload much of the material on past life. I just like to see amazing life forms in all their variety and this video give a lot most on Jurassic life than I have seen yet. Thanks. For me this is pretty much perfect for viewing of past life. Love to see more on previous plant life too as there really isn't all that much out in media
The strangest reptiles the world has ever seen….. shows a picture of a butterfly 🦋 😂. Still love the program.
Ignoring the egregious error of the title, it's nice to see a documentary on the early Mesozoic that isn't dinosaur centric. Because they did become the dominant group of animals in that time period, they gave rise to the birds, and their abrupt demise at the hands of the Chixulub meteor, the dinosaurs tend to hog the limelight to the point that we forget there were other creatures around when they first emerged. Yet, although these almost forgotten creatures are called reptiles, quite a number of them are more closely related to us. Either way, its nice to see a video about them!
"Ignoring the egregious error of the title"
- what error?
"Chixulub meteor"
- asteroid, not meteor
" the dinosaurs tend to hog the limelight to the point that we forget there were other creatures around when they first emerged. Yet, although these almost forgotten creatures are called reptiles, quite a number of them are more closely related to us"
- if the animals referred to _are_ in fact reptiles (I don't know which you are talking about), then NO, NONE of them are more closely related to us than to dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are reptiles too, we are not. That alone rubbishes your statement.
@@Dr.IanPlect damn lol, can’t argue with you there
@@eyeoferin 👍
You're also ignoring the fact that fake-a-saurses can't be proven
@@Dr.IanPlectYou're ignoring the fact that none of this is verifiable
You have an amazing voice that makes me peaceful . Thanks for this valuable information .
I find these programs so comforting. Our planet and the life on it has existed an unimaginably long time before us. It will be here long after we are gone.
“The Great Dying” is what I’ll call my mother in law’s last moments on this earth when she too becomes a thing of the past.
My dad would agree, he despises his ex wife’s mom 😂
Liked..., I do need subtitles to fully understand the text.., but I like this kind of content.
Greetings bibia.
You guys should make a video on EACH PERIOD OF DINOSAURS!!! IT WOULD BE SO COOL
"A Basil Tortoise with Jagged Shell & Spiny Neck & Head", sounds like a Alligator Snapping Turtle to me, the standard Snapping Turtle is equally dangerous & can carry these traits also
When animals are removed from the desperate struggle for survival, they are almost invariably sweet, playful, loving creatures wanting only affection.
That's what I thought before a raccoon killed me.
S.W.
Same with people most of the time.
Go play with the tigers at the zoo, they shouldn't be hungry and they're safe from harm.
😢all I can say is, keep on communicating you're doing just fine. Michael said that, bye for now my friend.
This channel should without question get a like for every view it gets an how it doesn't seems so wrong!!!!
Why would I put a "like" on unverifiable cartoon nonsense
@@davidsheckler4450 why would you leave such a negative comment on a comment that's far from negative?
@@houseguest4534 Why do you blindly believe in fake-a-saurses 🤷
@@davidsheckler4450 oh so you're a thicko then. Where is your proof to the contrary? I trust you have some verified papers from verified sources? No? Thought not. Thicko.
@@MahmWithThePlan "Verified papers" 😅🤣😂😅🤣😂😅🤣😂 that's absolutely ridiculous. Anyone can print up "verified papers " That means absolutely nothing. Unless you were there & can physically prove that you only have a "belief" which is fine you can believe anything you want. Care to share any fake-a-saurs selfies you might have taken? 🤔🤷 Thought not Jurassic Park lover. You've only established that you choose to believe unproven hearsay. I don't need "verified papers" 😅🤣😅😂🤣😅 what a ridiculous Sheeple statement. The fact that there isn't any REAL AND LEGITIMATE evidence anywhere is all that I need...unless again you have physical evidence which we both know don't 👍
Humans got to be the strangest animals to exist then
If scientist prove synapsids and reptiles are different class of animals, means Triassic is the age of Synapsids because the dominant animals in the Triassic Period is synapsids and the synapsids loses dominance during late Triassic.
Thanks! :D T&M
I really really love this. Thanks so much for making this. I will like and subscribe!
But I have to say something… That thing looks nothing like a kangaroo!! 😭😭 19:35
My favorite is dinocephalosarus it had to feed off of the coast like a heron
Excellent video and narration marred by booming audio.
Almost makes it unlistenable
When i was a kid i thought triassic periods is just fill with boring reptiles but it actually very interesting
As a kid that's ok...but you're supposed to be grown now & understand none of this is verifiable or provable
@@davidsheckler4450 oxygen thief
@@davidsheckler4450Other then all the overwhelming evidence from every edifice of modern biology you creationists are high on cope.
@@WokeandProud You're assuming "facts" based on hearsay. You have zero physical evidence. You can't verify or corroborate anything. "Believing" isn't evidence
@@davidsheckler4450The evidence says otherwise ill side with the raw data and the scientific consensus your argument from ignorance and incredulity mean nothing reality doesn't care about your feelings and neither do I.
which type of extinct reptile is believed to be the largest predator of the Triassic period btw?
I like this channel a lot. But I tend to fall asleep a lot from the narrators voice lol.
so many wonderful pets before
When you say unlike nothing else, that is essentially using a double negative. It's the equivalent of saying like everything else what you should be saying is unlike anything else I'm pretty sure the meaning behind that was intended to be that it was unique, so unlike anything else would be the appropriate way to state that
😂 You remind me of myself. Double negatives were my late wife’s only grammatical errors. (She couldn’t hardly get it.) 😅
This seems like an actual person’s voice. I’m more forgiving if I get the courtesy of a real voice. But a poorly written script by a non-native speaker using an AI can irk me.
@@martinphilip8998 You'd probably absolutely love my mother and her frequent use of irregardless. lol. I've actually heard that from other people but I hear it from her the most often although technically it is not grammatically correct, Especially when she uses it in a context where she actually means to say regardless. i'm not grammar police, but there are certain things that irk me from time to time especially when they are repeated errors. A lot of us use improper grammar especially when speaking informally, but certain things just tend to stick out like a sore thumb.
@@amandamatheny3675 Lol, I probably would love your mother. I’m just 70 year old boy. I had a career teaching gifted elementary students and modeled language. Lexicographers and grammarians would tell us that language is malleable and changes over time. To them I would ask, why then did my English teachers humiliate me for 5 years? Jess sayin’. Lol.
@@amandamatheny3675 That isn't a double negative.
Your audio is terrible otherwise an excellent production
the way this doc mentions countries, as if the earth always looked like modern times for eons
You mean that there wasn't always a USA? The countries are usually mentioned as a reference for where the remains of different animals were found in the present day.
Were there really trees as early as we're talking about here?
Yeah trees are a lot older than this
@@oscarcroft8342 Thanks. I thought there was only ferns and alike that erarly. Big but not trees as we mean them today.
Different trees have been around for a long time. Even before the Carboniferous.
Uhh, didn’t the Permian period come after the mass extinction??
That depends, which mass extinction are you referring to?
No, the "Great Dying" ended Perm and started Trias.
It was even the end of Paläozoic era and the beginning of Mesozoic era.
@@Berlitz20 Followed by the Homophobic era. Lol!
@@saltycreole2673 cringe
voice is too bass heavy - surely treated post production
This is just a guy voicing over images it's not a proper documentary. Take this information with a pinch of salt.
The narration for this is beyond irritating. The speech is so slow and the voice sounds AI generated. The content is very interesting, it's just presented in a mind-numbing way.
Uh ,North America would have not looked like it does today so I call amateuresque.
It's to show where they are found and where America Used to Be and Looked.
"Unlike nothing else.."
What?
Why do you show pictures of animals that have nothing to do with the Triassic?
I'm calling BULLSHIT on saying #Africa has the world's last #megafauna; the #IndianSubcontinent and the various islands of #Malayasia/#Indonesia still harbour various species of rhino and Asian elephants, which I assume are both big enough to qualify...?
Very informative, but the word 'strange' is definitely being overused here, making listening a bit hard.
I was good until that huge bug came on the screen...😮
This screams AI generated video. If you’re genuinely interested in the topic then there’s better options
This guys uses so many superlatives in introducing various creatures it's difficult to take him seriously on them. Seems like every other creature is introduced as the "strangest" or the "most remarkable." Not every animal can be the strangest, only one can - else you rob any meaning from using a superlative.
However they all do end up being remarkable anyway.
The Age of Cartoons
I: is a richard head . Got it?
Yes yes yes the best❤❤
AI
I got 7 ads 😢 really disrupted the experience
ADD AN AD BLOCKER TO YOUR BROWSER!
No ads, load an ad blocker i use Adblock plus. only disruption was when my cat walked across the keyboard.
Lolz
Loved to watch your vids but can't stand the narration. Just speak normally instead of the metered dance sentences.
Can the bones of these animals or other proof be found anywhere? I doubt it.
Yeah, oddly there was an ancient ocean cutting through North America from the Hudson Bay to the Golf of Mexico. Bones of ancient sea life are found all the time in Montana to Minnesota.
They're not periods, but events from the global flood.
Is that the flood where god murdered every single baby on the earth?
No.
Ugh, I hate science fiction.
Indeed, Christianity among the worst.
It's not science fiction dunning Kruger it's the past cope and seethe.
What's science fiction about it? God made a many of animals and life before Humans walked.
Why can't it be "God is (Why) & Evolution is (How)?"
What is the relevance of a humming bird and a raccoon. This is click bait.
Damm cool Video but in 9 minutes 3 chimericals it sucks…. So not gona watch this
ADD AN AD BLOCKER TO YOUR BROWSER!
Is that how you think the word *commercial* is spelled?
No one knows how any of the periods happend or ended or started it's all just a bunch of surmisers
Actually they do know how periods begin & end. They're the ones who named the periods & why they changed from one to another. Science doesn't work on just hypothesis. The periods you're eluding to are made of rock, & easy for 'them' to age it. These rock layers might have fossils in & they're the same age as the rock they're in. "They're" (science) not lying or exaggerating anything.
@@michealtaylor7745 I know I was just stating that in reality they don't factually know some of the things they claim
@@michealtaylor7745 they made up periods because no humans were alive to back up literally any fact that they claim,. (To an exstent) obviously we know of these periods but still when they ended and begun there is simply no way to know
@@patrickchristie7282 Such as? Where do you think they might be wrong?
@@michealtaylor7745 not saying really that anyone's wrong but the fact that it's near impossible to know something that we simply can't know for a fact that humans did not exist we are only really guessing
No confirm proved just another lousy scientist imaginative dream
No evidence provided just another lousy ignorant claim
Seriously dude, actually try putting some effort into researching paleontology.
What
Argument from incredulity.
Yeah, it's called fossils and bones.
Me when the video first starts: 😃😋🧐🤓
Me 5mins after video starts: 🥱😴😪😖
Drepanosaurus, in my theory/opinion, may have been a representative of the Mesozoic’s equivalent of ‘primates’ and may elude to the fact that there was a Sapient life form wandering around then, and likely before. Life desires sentience, it’s encoded in DNA of all life.
in what way is life desiring sentience?? im not saying it's impossible for a hominid-like reptile to have existed back then.
But looking at animals nowadays (and the extinct ones we have discovered) none other than us and our relatives seems to have taken this path.
also seeing that we are the only hominids that are alive today and the rest died out, it might be because it's not normally a beneficial path to go down and maybe we are the exception.
I hope this makes sense
not saying it's impossible ofc, but it's kind of a human bias to believe our evolutionary path to be the "desired one"/end goal. when in fact much of the evidence so far seems to be saying something else
Yeah, this is a really washy statement. It's a cool theory but nothing really backing it up
@@agathacathartese7041 nothing ‘wishy-washy’ about my statement, only your limited imagination/perception. I shouldn’t have to go into an essay about; environmental constraints, convergent evolution, homologous structures and repeating forms/body plans and roles/niches in the environment for someone to grasp my concepts. If you can’t see a Drepanosaurus potentially using it’s bizarre finger like an aye-aye, and a mirror of our existing ecosystem could have been mirrored in Cycles’ past, then I’m not trying to communicate with you. Maybe, someone with more of an understanding that the ‘more things change the more they stay the same’ Nature’s blueprint seems to have ideas all it’s own. Ichthyosaurs were essentially that Cycles’ dolphins and porpoises. Maybe, think out of the box, it’s more cozy out there when you realize we only have a small percentage of the world’s snapshot across time. Ok, pumpkin, thanks mmmm bye.
@@brockdavid nah dude, you're not thinking outside the box lol that's dumb as hell.
To just invent some random scenario based on (very likely not very educated) speculation and wild leaps of logic, and then believe in it, is dumb as all hell lol
Yeah, no thanks.