Kenworth 963 vs ZikZ 612H vs Azov 73210 vs Paystar 5600TS | Snowrunner

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @hermanjohnson9180
    @hermanjohnson9180 Рік тому +14

    They are not smaller they're supposed to have a worse rating in mud.
    But because of the nature of the dual tires in snowrunner you actually get more traction in mud. Especially if there's weight on the frame from cargo. This has already been tested and verified. The 5600TS has the most wheels in the game. The off-road class only (Tayga) tires and dual tires have the widest footprint in relation to tire size in the entire game.

  • @TheFzzzN
    @TheFzzzN Рік тому +13

    I'm almost sure that Azov was driving without an active suspension. If this is really the case, then the comparison is incorrect. To be honest, it is annoying that every second one does not test it on the maximum configuration.

    • @vladvulcan
      @vladvulcan 10 місяців тому

      +++++++

    • @Gamerhopper
      @Gamerhopper 10 місяців тому

      Zik will drown in water no matter the suspension ,already tried it

    • @TheFzzzN
      @TheFzzzN 10 місяців тому

      Ошибайтесь. @@Gamerhopper

    • @believer431
      @believer431 8 місяців тому

      Justice for the Azov 73210 😢✊

  • @Santoroz
    @Santoroz Рік тому +5

    Zikz 612 is better with the Fine Tuned gearbox. You should test the 612 again with that to see. It's advanced special low gear is way low at .50

  • @MASKOAA
    @MASKOAA Рік тому +9

    Paystar might do better with OHD tires even though they are smaller

  • @michat395
    @michat395 Рік тому +5

    Good job, but i think zikz should have fine tune gearbox its faster in offroad.

  • @NeutralGenericUser
    @NeutralGenericUser Рік тому

    Awesome! I loved this video; as someone new to this game, I really appreciate these videos. Another advantage for the Kenworth is rock climbing; thanks to its massive tires and ground clearance, it's the best rock climber out of these trucks imo.

  • @lonewanzerpilot
    @lonewanzerpilot Рік тому +3

    I hope devs NEVER nerf the Zikz 612.
    Let it be the really skilled players' brag; "I never needed the Mastodon".
    Meanwhile, let us other casuals who just want to access game content have a truck that can do most of Amur.

    • @Danko05
      @Danko05 Рік тому +2

      Actually it got buffed, its tires got a change in their stats that makes them a lot better.

    • @vladvulcan
      @vladvulcan 10 місяців тому

      It needs a nerf. Since it's available from level 1 and has multiple tires to choose from, these tires have to be level locked. It should come with ATHS I, then get OHS at level 11, only then on level 13 should the ZHM and MHS be unlocked. Same with engines. I don't understand why some trucks have AWD and difflock unlocked at high levels (13-14), and such OP trucks with everything always on don't even have a single level locked upgrade.

    • @believer431
      @believer431 8 місяців тому +1

      @@vladvulcan It doesn't need a Nerf, c'mon. I have a better idea, make the truck available at level 30, or make it a contract or task in Amur to acquire it, like the 605r

    • @vladvulcan
      @vladvulcan 8 місяців тому

      @@believer431 No one will agree waiting to start using a DLC trucks that they paid for

    • @martymcfly3091
      @martymcfly3091 3 місяці тому +1

      Yes and I would never buy a DLC from them again if they nerf my paid DLC truck!

  • @G0dzilla971
    @G0dzilla971 Рік тому +2

    612 should have won but it’s from overhang slowed it down a lot when running into water or snow while kenworth is a high truck and wide tires and is able to pull through faster then the 612

  • @eelnikar
    @eelnikar Рік тому +4

    Paystar performs better with ohd tires overall

  • @efreitorhabibulin238
    @efreitorhabibulin238 Рік тому +3

    i'm a huge fan of old soviet era trucks, but ziks' fuel consumption should be ~50% more and close to kenworth (the real ziks has 2 v12 engines and does about similar 2-3mpg), but i think it is done this way to balance things out as a lot of soviet and russian trucks/scouts are nerfed quite a bit (tatarin and Yar are fully amphibious in real life, yet in game tatarin can barely touch water), voron trucks in real life can have same mud tires tayga has, etc.

    • @Andrea-B-65-UK
      @Andrea-B-65-UK Рік тому +1

      It's the Zil 135 (P & ML versions) that has two engines both 180 BHP with ridiculous amounts of torque & max speed of around 37 mph. The only Maz truck ever fitted with more that one engine was the enormous Maz 7909 which could be fitted with two rear mounted gas turbines to supply more power for its electro-mechanical drivetrain
      The Zil 167 was also trialled with duel engines. The engine most commonly found in Soviet era multi axle (8X8 & over) trucks is the T34/T55 tank engine or a derivative of it

  • @Tytus01UNIT
    @Tytus01UNIT Рік тому +8

    GOSH... again... another interesting test that I have to recalculate because creators don't use the best tires... such a big mistake with 5600TS tires. OHD I (0.8/3/1.9). GENERAL RULE: If u see any truck in ShowRunner with OHD, use it. Double tires on the back are best and it is no small difference.

  • @tylermathis-kx7pu
    @tylermathis-kx7pu Рік тому +3

    I guess the Kenworth is way better with the 15L Wanderer engine? It’s a real struggle bus with the stock one.

    • @vladvulcan
      @vladvulcan 10 місяців тому

      of course every truck is maxed out

  • @MrCrowtheKing
    @MrCrowtheKing Рік тому +6

    Hast du bei den Azov 73210 das aktive Fahrwerk benutzt? Die paar Zentimeter haben bei mir oft ein Unterschied gemacht.

    • @MCoTEDDY
      @MCoTEDDY Рік тому +1

      Video is in english, your question is in german... notice any issue?

    • @MrCrowtheKing
      @MrCrowtheKing Рік тому +3

      @@MCoTEDDY Did you use the active landing gear on the Azov 73210? The few centimeters often made a difference for me.

    • @MrCrowtheKing
      @MrCrowtheKing Рік тому +3

      @@MCoTEDDY Avez-vous utilisé le train d'atterrissage actif sur l'Azov 73210 ? Les quelques centimètres faisaient souvent la différence pour moi.

    • @MrCrowtheKing
      @MrCrowtheKing Рік тому +3

      @@MCoTEDDY هل استخدمت معدات الهبوط النشطة على Azov 73210؟ غالبًا ما أحدثت السنتيمترات القليلة فرقًا بالنسبة لي.

    • @MrCrowtheKing
      @MrCrowtheKing Рік тому +3

      @@MCoTEDDY Вы на Азове 73210 активное шасси использовали? Несколько сантиметров часто имели для меня значение.

  • @frestyze
    @frestyze 5 місяців тому

    You should start a 4 player coop and do a race using your most trusted truck. I think that would be very entertaining.

  • @brokenmonkeyrc8350
    @brokenmonkeyrc8350 10 місяців тому

    What an excellent review! Thank you very much.

  • @zachthepizzaguy
    @zachthepizzaguy Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the great vid! very informative!

  • @Quakez0r
    @Quakez0r Місяць тому

    Azov 7 is not really the best truck at anything, but it's a truck you can more or less complete the whole game with. It's pretty good in any situation.

  • @nunosantos00
    @nunosantos00 6 місяців тому +1

    I still don't have that Ziks but those are some of the best trucks in reviews by far.
    Paystar 5600TS is like many International with upgrades,drunk truck with a very small fuel truck.
    Azov 73210,very good but that long nose at the front makes it useless in some terrain.
    Kenworth is size over substance,you put some cargo on it and doesn't even have to be very heavy and it can barely crawl up hill and i have the best engine possible and all upgrades and even it's special MSH mud tires.
    I would choose that Ziks over the other 3 any day.

  • @zeusyoursonhasreturnedibri7603

    Blud you dont even know when to shift in which gear zixz612h would easily win but u keep shifting it in low gear

  • @Shiftry87
    @Shiftry87 Рік тому

    The fuel economy test was abit wierd becouse a trucks range is heavily gonna depend on the terrain its going through becouse its burning more fuel and goes way slower in a swamp then on a road so for better accuracy i would have suggested this test in medium difficult mud terrain. But that would probadly have taken way to long and this track test still gave u a general ide of the different ranges compared betwinn the trucks.

  • @DittusToth
    @DittusToth 22 дні тому

    Lol... Why dont you use High gear in the first test? Low + only use when the mud too deep and the tyres going down

  • @أحمدالغريب-ص9ح
    @أحمدالغريب-ص9ح 8 місяців тому

    Is the Sony X90L TV suitable for Snow Runner?

  • @iliakalvani8820
    @iliakalvani8820 Рік тому

    بازم عالی

  • @aydinAGF
    @aydinAGF Рік тому +1

    bro can i ask where are you from?

  • @DrRock1970
    @DrRock1970 2 місяці тому

    Kenworth crashes all the time coz the driver regularly falls asleep at the wheel coz it's so slow

  • @rubberducky4692
    @rubberducky4692 5 місяців тому

    Azov is without raised suspension

  • @captaindreadnought212
    @captaindreadnought212 Рік тому +1

    As much as I like it I think the Azov is a really overrated truck, no other vehicle gets stuck on roots and rocks more (other than the Mack which they're fixing)

    • @vodkawhisperer3923
      @vodkawhisperer3923 11 місяців тому

      It has the best utility out of them all

    • @vladvulcan
      @vladvulcan 10 місяців тому +1

      @@vodkawhisperer3923not really

    • @vladvulcan
      @vladvulcan 10 місяців тому +1

      It was overrated when the game just came out, but now DLC trucks make it redundant.

  • @josephfuller6229
    @josephfuller6229 3 місяці тому +1

    Personally I don't ever find it necessary to use low in the zik612

  • @Danko05
    @Danko05 Рік тому +7

    Nice video, I'm really enjoying the new Kenworth and Azov 73210 has always been among the best, with the active suspension even better.
    All those trucks are good, sadly they gave Paystar stupidly small fuel tank.

  • @butzemann2022
    @butzemann2022 5 місяців тому +1