The US Navy wants to build thousands of drones to counter China. Nobody wants to build them.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • The US Navy is seeking contractors to build thousands of low-cost unmanned drones to counter China's dominance in these technologies. But the military-industrial complex is committed to continue the focus on large, high-cost ships and submarines.
    Despite the Navy's public insistence that unmanned drones and submersibles are a priority, it has made few capital commitments, especially long-term, to attract interest from shipbuilders. What's more, legacy shipbuilders for the Navy strongly prefer to make weapons systems according to the models that exist now, given profit margins and lack of capacity.
    Resources and links:
    Chinese shipbuilding capacity over 200 times greater than US, Navy intelligence says
    www.foxnews.com/world/chinese...
    Active aircraft carriers, by country
    www.visualcapitalist.com/visu...
    Insight: Sea drone warfare has arrived. The U.S. is floundering.
    www.reuters.com/business/aero...
    Houthi fight extracts heavy cost from Pentagon
    thehill.com/policy/defense/45...
    3 U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones, worth about $30 million each, have crashed in Yemen since November
    www.cbsnews.com/news/3-u-s-mq...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 530

  • @thewackymonkey920
    @thewackymonkey920 14 днів тому +326

    China has millions of STEM graduates yearly, and the US has millions of undecided genders yearly.

    • @peterlim1972
      @peterlim1972 14 днів тому +44

      @@HarlanK The Chinese are returning to China even those that was born in the US as they are not treated well. It's a racist policy. Young Chinese may stay and work to learn and gain experiences but ultimately they return to China. The US economy is also not very rosy today while China is still growing.

    • @melvinbarnett1910
      @melvinbarnett1910 14 днів тому +15

      😂😂😂 faaacts

    • @peterlim1972
      @peterlim1972 14 днів тому +5

      @@melvinbarnett1910 A one liner wonder. 🤣🤣

    • @kenw.4539
      @kenw.4539 14 днів тому +21

      The US has millions of lawyers who run our government at all levels, Federal, State, local.

    • @Feibie
      @Feibie 14 днів тому

      Parasitic ​@@kenw.4539

  • @abrarabbaby
    @abrarabbaby 14 днів тому +161

    America will probably ask China to manufacture all those drones for them 😂😂😂😂

    • @josephdewuhan
      @josephdewuhan 14 днів тому

      Just like all the MAGA labels, hats, shirts, and flags are made in evil Chyna.

    • @cool-eye3674
      @cool-eye3674 14 днів тому +24

      That's over-capacity at its best.

    • @adamiskandar5107
      @adamiskandar5107 14 днів тому +5

      Aren't they worried that the drones will self-destruct at the critical moment?

    • @hc1897
      @hc1897 14 днів тому +8

      Maybe not the actual assembling, but from the parts + material point of view, it already is.

    • @michaelfung4629
      @michaelfung4629 14 днів тому +1

      They'll definately do that!

  • @peterlim1972
    @peterlim1972 14 днів тому +222

    China peobably has millions of drones and the Chinese drones are way better and cheaper. China's DJI is the world largest producer of commercial drones and supplies 70% of these drones to the world. Countries have been tinkering with these drones to make them into weapons. They're cheap and good and is even better than US military drones.

    • @gelinrefira
      @gelinrefira 14 днів тому +39

      China is likely also going to be the first navy to field the world's first drone carrier.

    • @Rudyjosephjr
      @Rudyjosephjr 14 днів тому +16

      ​@@gelinrefirareminds me of Protoss swarm fleet

    • @leonardpearlman4017
      @leonardpearlman4017 14 днів тому +1

      Yeah, it looks like it's a Drone INDUSTRY in China! If we produce thousands, why wouldn't they ramp up integrated giant factories and produce MILLIONS? Let's not go there. WE started this little technological revolution, were in the lead for awhile and felt very clever about it... now it's turned on us, and we're going to see if we can't make it WORSE?

    • @turtlesoup8134
      @turtlesoup8134 14 днів тому +5

      @@gelinrefira The drone carrier is probably a submersible. Otherwise, the large aircraft carriers and amphibious landing ships will carry the long range large drones.

    • @danielb7253
      @danielb7253 14 днів тому

      Chinese drones use western made chips.

  • @brianliew5901
    @brianliew5901 14 днів тому +112

    China can produced 30 million cars annually and drones is just a piece of cake. Never ever stir a locust nest unnecessarily.

    • @ramonching7772
      @ramonching7772 14 днів тому +27

      Agree. That's what the US did to Russia with Ukraine. They are now in a quandary of how to avoid surrendering and save face. 😂😂😂

    • @cb250nighthawk3
      @cb250nighthawk3 14 днів тому

      Using the Filipino idiots 😂😂😂

    • @hanmi1216
      @hanmi1216 14 днів тому +21

      ​@@ramonching7772they don't have to save face, they don't have any 😅😅😅😅

    • @davidwoon6402
      @davidwoon6402 14 днів тому +7

      I believe you meant 'hornets' and not locusts.. right?! The ones with the venomous stings that buzzzzz around like crazyyyy when it spot unfriendly personnel! Well.., 🇺🇸 is definitely unfriendly..! 😅😂

    • @brianliew5901
      @brianliew5901 14 днів тому +6

      @@davidwoon6402 Locusts are more numerous and more devastating, leaving nothing untouched.

  • @polysporin8332
    @polysporin8332 14 днів тому +137

    US thousands of drones vs. China millions of drones. Hmmm 🤔

    • @seymorefact4333
      @seymorefact4333 14 днів тому +22

      you mean BILLIONS OF DRONES!

    • @brianliew5901
      @brianliew5901 14 днів тому

      More than half of the thousands US drones were made in China.😂😂😂😂😂

    • @antwango
      @antwango 14 днів тому +5

      its more like tens of drones versus millions!!

    • @monipenny408
      @monipenny408 14 днів тому +4

      China produces a full EV every few seconds, drones would be a piece of cake.

  • @michaelmarchal4004
    @michaelmarchal4004 14 днів тому +90

    Haha, If the USA can do it imagine how much China can build. 😅😅😅

    • @Cheesecake99YearsAgo
      @Cheesecake99YearsAgo 14 днів тому +4

      Arouns 200x in volume 😂

    • @topsuperseven7910
      @topsuperseven7910 14 днів тому +1

      Much less without high end chips and 10x less wealth than the USA.

    • @couthelloworld
      @couthelloworld 14 днів тому +5

      @@topsuperseven7910 high end chips doesn't need on drones that explode.

    • @topsuperseven7910
      @topsuperseven7910 14 днів тому

      @@couthelloworld maybe but youre going to want them on them on the long distance remote controllers and all the systems to run them as well as these facilities that will mass produce them... until US high end chip missiles obliterate them.

    • @oberstleutnant787
      @oberstleutnant787 14 днів тому +1

      That's why USa accuse China of "over capacity"

  • @hongkongchina2048
    @hongkongchina2048 14 днів тому +70

    How much did you spend to shoot down the weather balloons? 🎈

    • @dice138
      @dice138 14 днів тому +20

      I heard from the news back then. They used the sidewinder missiles to shoot down the weather balloon. About a million each. They used about 3 or 4 of them. The balloon cost less than $1000 on Taobao.😂

    • @benjaminnguyen554
      @benjaminnguyen554 14 днів тому +9

      @@dice138 lol

    • @danielli9167
      @danielli9167 14 днів тому +6

      What happen is it were 5k drones in formation?

    • @saynotowars
      @saynotowars 14 днів тому +14

      When the United States shot down the Chinese spy balloon intending to showcase its prowess, the opposite happened. Instead, the U.S. was ridiculed for spending millions of dollars to shoot down a balloon worth only a few thousand dollars, which could be purchased on Amazon or Alibaba.😂😂😂

    • @cb250nighthawk3
      @cb250nighthawk3 14 днів тому +9

      ​@@danielli9167
      Biden and Trump would disappear into their business class bunkers. 🤣

  • @user-oi5to6zy5l
    @user-oi5to6zy5l 14 днів тому +113

    I'd be so depressed if I was pro American.

    • @Ludak021
      @Ludak021 14 днів тому +1

      I think you wouldn't give a rats as$ about any of this...for now

    • @jazening3075
      @jazening3075 14 днів тому

      It’s actually not the American Citizens that is the issue or problem. It’s the American Government that is the problem. I refused to Vote because of that matter but the majority of the people here in America are quite pleasant but some do feel a sense of superiority because they are Anglo-Saxon Caucasian, European descendants. Ooh, yeah - they also feel that they are titled & privileged because they are White Americans, which is disturbing and those are the Racist White Americans. I just stay far away from those kinds of people.👍🙂

    • @antwango
      @antwango 14 днів тому

      you'd be dowsing yourself and burning either yourself or your uniform in public with no one caring! says alot about the US and West!!! theres no comparison with any other country on the globe right now making these sorts of statements and the media not reporting on any of this BS!!!

    • @Airbender-kl7cu
      @Airbender-kl7cu 14 днів тому

      🤣🤣

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 14 днів тому +1

      Nah, the true Americans are trying to redefine the free speech, they're doing a good job, whom would have thought they can reconstruct their First Amendment. 😁😁

  • @tonywatt3281
    @tonywatt3281 14 днів тому +26

    If you ever watched the Chinese New Year drone show every year since the debut of drone shows at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, how the performance dazzles, you should be able to conclude their Military will certainly be more innovative and impressive.

  • @zomplak
    @zomplak 14 днів тому +46

    key word of the day is "CHEAPER but not CHINA"
    1 country investing for scientist and engineer while the other invest on racist and lobbyist

    • @kenw.4539
      @kenw.4539 14 днів тому

      The Chinese are not allowed to succeed unless they are under the West's total domination like the Japanese and South Koreans. It makes the white people uncomfortable and angry as that's a challenge to their imperialism and colonialism.

    • @jacquelineperet6599
      @jacquelineperet6599 14 днів тому

      💯✅️💯✅️

    • @frankm6218
      @frankm6218 14 днів тому

      and MAGAs.

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 14 днів тому

      And lawyers.....tins of lawyers.

  • @amandagrant4331
    @amandagrant4331 14 днів тому +95

    As far as I know, US drones are very expensive.
    This is also the reason why Chinese, Turkish and Iranian drones have been put into war in Ukraine.

    • @tangbesitangbesi7009
      @tangbesitangbesi7009 14 днів тому +8

      Not only expensive, there are reports that they tend to drop out of the sky half way to their targets

    • @user-qu8zq2ve7x
      @user-qu8zq2ve7x 14 днів тому +7

      China does not sell UAVs for war, Russia and Ukraine each buy DJI from other countries and send it to the battlefield, which has nothing to do with China. They will also go to Shenzhen to buy parts for drones and assemble them themselves, but these are legitimate civilian products, and we can't restrict the flow of these drones.

    • @yaelz6043
      @yaelz6043 13 днів тому

      At a guess they are overengineered like the rest of America's arsenal.

  • @kiplinghu
    @kiplinghu 14 днів тому +67

    China Chongqing motor bike manufacturer can shift into Drone factory at the production rate of 1 million drones per year in war time. And that is only based on its current production rate; such number can be increased to 2 millions/y by working 24/7, and expanding its unused facilities.

    • @leonardpearlman4017
      @leonardpearlman4017 14 днів тому +15

      This is (something like) what I'm always saying! It seems obvious that in China there's co-ordination in advance for war production! I bet they have long since decided what they're going to do when the time comes, in detail, and the plans are probably kept up to date. America out-produced its rivals in WWII, this story is familiar to everyone. Not so familiar is the idea that we will BE out-produced this time, and be on the other end of that stick as we say.

    • @hanmi1216
      @hanmi1216 14 днів тому +15

      And that's only 1 bike manufacturer in 1 city. If they enter a war time economy, imagine how much they can produce in a year? Since they are the factory of the world with "overcapacity"

    • @antwango
      @antwango 14 днів тому

      China has AI controlled and robotic manufacturing and massive 3D printing giga factories or whatever lol!!! This is the reason the US and the West uses China as a manufacturer! China is super efficient, super fast! good luck to india or anybody else trying to follow in the shadows of China as a manufacturer! the drop off is immense!

    • @trekpac2
      @trekpac2 14 днів тому

      Yes, the Chinese have astounding ability to refit quickly to change production lines ad finitum. But the West does not.

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 14 днів тому +7

      @@leonardpearlman4017 Chinese manufacturing is extremely agile, and can modify or stand up new product lines much faster than any other country, especially America. We saw this during Covid when they suddenly shifted to mass production of PPE and built 2 hospitals in as many months. If you are that quick, you don't need such hard plans in place, you simply switch to what's needed.

  • @roddiechan
    @roddiechan 14 днів тому +51

    US keeps talking about going to wars. Why don't they try world peace talk for a change. Ooops, the MIC will be unemployed n their pockets will be empty😂😂

    • @luisanthonychau
      @luisanthonychau 14 днів тому +5

      It is more than MIC. It is the survival of USD; hence, the survival of US regime.

    • @litesp
      @litesp 14 днів тому

      @@luisanthonychau The USD is threatened by US policy. Sanctions, weaponizing the USD, theft of national assets are backfiring.

    • @bertanelson8062
      @bertanelson8062 2 дні тому

      Exactly.

  • @mijmijrm
    @mijmijrm 14 днів тому +83

    i think it's probably a good thing that the most belligerent are the worst at making weapons.

    • @shaundudley4576
      @shaundudley4576 14 днів тому +6

      Lovely Thought

    • @josephdewuhan
      @josephdewuhan 14 днів тому +10

      Never thought of that. But a good point to convince the public so that they demand their rulers behave less belligerent.

    • @timothyrockwell2638
      @timothyrockwell2638 14 днів тому

      Of course, they are literally poorly educated barbarians whose entire economic system and foreign policy is based on exploitation, and in the words of Trump's former director of CIA and Secretary of the State Dept, "We lied, we cheated, we stole, we had entire training courses. It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment."

  • @TAL142
    @TAL142 14 днів тому +15

    This Sputnik moment is different. China is sole superpower in manufacturing. Nobody can out manufacture China. They have the entire supply chain. The reason China is not building hundreds of warships is because they don’t want their ship building relying solely on military spending like US did. Basically US ship building and steel industries went out of business when there were no more government military spending. China wants to build ships for economic growth and dual use. The goal is to build enough warships to defend but avoid over expanding. This way they can build newer warships constantly to replace older warships with newer and better warships.

  • @sword7872
    @sword7872 14 днів тому +19

    Its a good thing that the expensive weapons are not the winners in a war. This is the best kind of human progress where the $200 weapon can destroy a $2m weapon.

    • @adamiskandar5107
      @adamiskandar5107 14 днів тому +6

      Before this, the hegemon was the sole heavyweight champion with no challengers. Someone pls tell the hegemon that the law of the jungle no longer applies and it need to abide by the rules of civilization.

    • @bemmychan1518
      @bemmychan1518 13 днів тому +1

      That's actually good for MIC business. If the US weapons are cheap, they would need trillion units to make it worthwhile for the MIC. 😂😂😂😂

  • @tompell3032
    @tompell3032 14 днів тому +32

    The US military the biggest spender by far. Why? They are paying $90,000 for small steel bushings in a small ziploc bag (20 to 30 bushings in all),. Now you can undertand why.

    • @kenw.4539
      @kenw.4539 14 днів тому

      That's just the tip of the iceberg. ALL the defense contractors have been doing that all the time for decades, stealing billions of dollars of precious US tax dollars not going to infrastructure or education or health care or housing and the politicians know about it and let them get away with it. Under Trump, the number of Pentagon inspector generals went way down even though everyone knew this is going on. It's literally like some kind of mafia, organized crime racket. That's not an understatement sadly.

    • @keyser021
      @keyser021 14 днів тому

      Rep. Gaetz got Def. Sec. Austin to admit on camera that only 29% of ALL F35s produced are flyable, the other 71% are R&D mishaps. At $100 million per plane, think of the TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS of $ that is grifted and stolen from US tax payers, to get in return an F35 that is obsolete via drone swarms. Geniuses running the grift.

    • @beegonee
      @beegonee 14 днів тому +2

      And still imported from china..😅

    • @tompell3032
      @tompell3032 13 днів тому +3

      @@beegonee pay the chinese $10, then resell to uncle SAM for $90,000.

    • @bemmychan1518
      @bemmychan1518 13 днів тому +1

      And don't forget the cost of toilets and screws and nuts! They are super high quality and super expensive. 😂😂😂😂

  • @CraigTheBrute-yf7no
    @CraigTheBrute-yf7no 14 днів тому +38

    Yemen is building underground drone bases with cheap chinese AI chips

    • @user-gb5qd6mp5x
      @user-gb5qd6mp5x 14 днів тому +8

      The large-scale industrialization of drones. The cost of starting a war is very low, and one million US dollars is enough to start a war, which is thanks to China's industrial revolution

    • @user-ed9so2rb4k
      @user-ed9so2rb4k 13 днів тому +1

      Talking about Yemen, isn't this nation among the poorest of the Arab nations? And yet, they could prevent the might of NATO from using the Suez Canal. Why is the might of the US unable to stop this threat? Obviously, there is a lot of explanation. The US military leadership thought high priced products are superior? If such quality is the yardstick, it is obvious the real value of US industrial complexes are definitely over-priced by too many folds!

  • @rontsang4308
    @rontsang4308 14 днів тому +6

    Hollywood needs these ships for movie props. How are they going to make Tom looks cool without those aircraft carriers?

  • @tomiputra3720
    @tomiputra3720 14 днів тому +23

    1 US drone equal the prices 1000 -10.000 Chinese drones 😅

    • @mileszhang5773
      @mileszhang5773 14 днів тому +4

      and the chinese drones are better

    • @peterlim1972
      @peterlim1972 14 днів тому +3

      Three of the most expensive US drones whose name I can't remember was taken down by the Houthis.Each drone cost $30 million. It makes me wonder how the US, the UK etc can win in a war with China when they can't even defeat the Houthis?

  • @Dordord
    @Dordord 14 днів тому +23

    32 ASAE radars on the Fujian carrier are waiting for those drones😂😂😂

    • @mileszhang5773
      @mileszhang5773 14 днів тому +2

      not fujian carrier, there will be a new type of drone carrier

  • @raymondtay9442
    @raymondtay9442 14 днів тому +27

    Capt America will sanction the drones and all will fall into the sea!

  • @TrollogyExpert
    @TrollogyExpert 14 днів тому +29

    The US navy is not shooting down drones with $2mil missile, that would be very dangerous because there is no such thing as 100% interception rate, they need to fire 2 $2mil missiles per drone.

    • @hanmi1216
      @hanmi1216 14 днів тому +13

      Well, when they shoot down a balloon they indeed need 2 missiles, because the first 1 is missed. A drone is faster than a balloon, I guess they're missed a lot.

    • @trekpac2
      @trekpac2 14 днів тому +4

      The US has been shooting down some cheap drones with expensive missiles.

    • @tangbesitangbesi7009
      @tangbesitangbesi7009 14 днів тому +3

      Couldn't agree more with you

  • @wimbletone1
    @wimbletone1 14 днів тому +43

    Dumb vs Dumb UsA is so Not awinner anymore

  • @siewkonsum7291
    @siewkonsum7291 14 днів тому +32

    The Chinese can do the same. Their standby stock of all kinds of drones that can convert to military purposes is 200 millions units at any time. 😊

  • @cool-eye3674
    @cool-eye3674 14 днів тому +35

    "Cheap" might be a dirty word in the MIC circle. They probably don't care much about casualties in action, or the actual effectiveness of the equipment they built. All they want is money. It's a shameful culture. The US will continue to spend more on defense (in fact, it's offense) budgets, while getting less from the money.

    • @kenw.4539
      @kenw.4539 14 днів тому

      The Russians just destroyed 5 $10 million dollar M1 Abrams tanks in Ukraine in the past few days without much effort because they are supposedly exploiting a flaw in these tanks.

    • @tangbesitangbesi7009
      @tangbesitangbesi7009 14 днів тому +3

      Well said

    • @litesp
      @litesp 14 днів тому +2

      The US has the most expensive military in the world, not the most effective.

    • @jsb8888
      @jsb8888 13 днів тому +1

      ask Ukrainian why they prefer Chinese drone than fancy expensive US one. It is reliability. Boeing and US automakers are examples of poor quality US manufactures.

  • @leoncioco3305
    @leoncioco3305 14 днів тому +19

    The folly we embark, when we could just as easily cooperate and prosper together..

    • @antwango
      @antwango 14 днів тому

      yeeeah the entire world knows this its just the usual colonials who want to remain colonials!

  • @misty671
    @misty671 14 днів тому +6

    We need to stop war mongering and focus on improving the lives of our citizens.

    • @paulw4487
      @paulw4487 14 днів тому +1

      US govt has given up on improving lives of Americans. On fact it will need to take things away like medicare....just to minimize the deficit.

    • @bemmychan1518
      @bemmychan1518 13 днів тому +2

      Well, the US government believes in killing off all the external competitors first before focusing on internal. Whereas the Chinese believes in strengthening internal first, before embarking on external. 😂😂😂😂

  • @user-ew5eh2co5p
    @user-ew5eh2co5p 14 днів тому +29

    US’s 11 carriers is a number only. Most of these carriers are old and needs lots of services.

    • @danielb7253
      @danielb7253 14 днів тому

      Plz inform with facts. Not just generalizations. U ever serve?

    • @michaelloong964
      @michaelloong964 14 днів тому +7

      Half of them are in the repair docks waiting for $90000 bushings.

    • @UlyaGaniya
      @UlyaGaniya 14 днів тому +7

      They're likely floating coffins by today standard

    • @hanmi1216
      @hanmi1216 14 днів тому

      ​@@danielb7253you'll generalise if all the US products are like that. Just looked at Boeing. Or Chevrolet cars.... My dad's Chevrolet takes longer in the repair shop than in my house garage. Use 1 month then 3 months in the repair shop, and keep repeating....

    • @willengel-vs8ht
      @willengel-vs8ht 14 днів тому +3

      the most they can get underway is 3-4 at one time. the rule of thumb is 3-3-3. three underway, three in routine maintenance, 3 major overhaul.

  • @SteveBurg2001
    @SteveBurg2001 14 днів тому +13

    Giant aircraft carriers don't seem viable in a modern war. They're mostly a jobs program in the US, and probably a nice juicy target for hypersonic drones.

    • @hanmi1216
      @hanmi1216 14 днів тому +4

      The Jobs program is the number 2. Number 1 is the pocket of the lobbyist, MIC and politicians. The Jobs program is only a collateral that will be used during elections.

    • @litesp
      @litesp 14 днів тому +4

      Floating cemetery.

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 14 днів тому

      They're still very good for bullying small, weak countries. America loves to bully small, weak countries, so they still need carriers. For now.

    • @georgepoitras3502
      @georgepoitras3502 11 днів тому

      The Hypersonic missiles that don't work and get shot down all of the time over Ukraine? Those hypersonic missiles? NO ONE CARES.

  • @alanbgtan
    @alanbgtan 14 днів тому +10

    Yes US & China are competing & US is spending more. But it cost $billions in USA just to build one whereas it cost few thousands of $ for China to do same. It’s not the same

  • @lutherquick165
    @lutherquick165 14 днів тому +3

    You need to keep this format - your 18,000 subscribers should be 18,000,000 - keep at this. Great work. I love the short video format.

  • @teac117
    @teac117 14 днів тому +10

    I always laughed in the game Civ when my aircraft carriers lost to enemy phalanx units. Who would have thought it was an accurate sim.

  • @mrblurblur2003
    @mrblurblur2003 14 днів тому +8

    The only way for US Navy to be cost effective is to sit down and talk to the Chinese and forge a long term contract on building low cost drones. Now it is advised that the US Navy be humble and polite to the Chinese and they won't take kindly to rude officers such as Blinken did. Btw bring along your finest champagne 😂

  • @stevenpreston5619
    @stevenpreston5619 14 днів тому +7

    30 million for a reaper drone, which really only cost 1 million to make.......no wonder U.S has the largest spending on weapons ( ALL overpriced by 20 - 100 times )...Sick😢

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 14 днів тому +1

      A mug that cost 1,280, 6 goats cost 2 millions, stretcher that cost ....

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 14 днів тому

      The American taxpayers are paying all these nonsense, and it's middle class that made up of the big chunk of tax paying....if you're rich enough, you don't pay tax but pay the lobbyists.

  • @user-nz8wm2ct4n
    @user-nz8wm2ct4n 14 днів тому +10

    An out of the box suggestion: Out-source the lot to China - China could build for the US navy cheaper, faster and better. What is there not to like?😁

    • @cool-eye3674
      @cool-eye3674 14 днів тому

      There is a problem. Chinese manufacturers can't get hold of (American made) chips and batteries to put into American drones. The user manuals will be in Chinese language.

    • @user-nz8wm2ct4n
      @user-nz8wm2ct4n 14 днів тому +6

      @@cool-eye3674 No problem. Just use Chinese chips and batteries which are far better. They can be debugged to eliminate back-channels and spywares. The user manuals? Even less of a problem. No user manuals now. An AI algo could be used to communicate/speak and exhibit in any language. Even explain in simple English for the slow-minded.😁

    • @adamiskandar5107
      @adamiskandar5107 14 днів тому

      @@user-nz8wm2ct4n Too late. They may have banned DJI first, but now the Chinese government are controlling the export of 'strategic materials/products' to unfriendly foreigners. Even if the US government were to beg them to 'recouple', they would likely think twice. Trust once lost would take a long time to rebuild.

    • @JustianoHolguin
      @JustianoHolguin 14 днів тому

      ​@@user-nz8wm2ct4n
      The real issue, politicians and protectionism for their homemade, expensive electronics.

    • @IwanSetiawan-cc4ft
      @IwanSetiawan-cc4ft 14 днів тому

      @@user-nz8wm2ct4n exactly

  • @conybrown991
    @conybrown991 2 дні тому

    Never thought about building thousands drone is a topic.

  • @wnklee6878
    @wnklee6878 14 днів тому +2

    Ruling the world is not what it used to be.

  • @yingxu7908
    @yingxu7908 14 днів тому +2

    Thank you Kevin have fun🎉🎉🎉加油👏

  • @DingoHammer
    @DingoHammer 14 днів тому +3

    I think a US admiral once said that there are two types of ships, submarines and targets.

    • @cb250nighthawk3
      @cb250nighthawk3 14 днів тому +1

      I think he said "submarines and sitting ducks" 😂😂😂

    • @UlyaGaniya
      @UlyaGaniya 14 днів тому

      Wait until chinese underwater drones revealed, all will be target

  • @TanuKart
    @TanuKart 14 днів тому +1

    imagine shooting a weather balloon for millions of dollars

  • @trekpac2
    @trekpac2 14 днів тому +3

    Kevin, your analyses are extremely well done, factual, connected to top news sources.
    Who ARE you!? I’d like to know more about you, broadcasting prolifically from a different city in China every day.

  • @CattleFarmer667
    @CattleFarmer667 14 днів тому +2

    Why not? A bag bushing cost USD90k for US army. I'm sure someone can make lots of money making drone for US.

  • @user-iv2px8eb1e
    @user-iv2px8eb1e 14 днів тому +2

    When you have a thousand they are will has a ten thousands, don't forget they're world factory

  • @Larkinchance
    @Larkinchance 14 днів тому +3

    Amid a public relations fan-fair, China introduced a new aircraft carrier. I suspect that it was just for show to set the US off on a ship building spree. This is old established technology and the carrier and the fighter jets that it carries are obsolete. I suspect that China is investing their energies in AI piloted drones that be launched in a synchronized swarm in addition to public relations traps for the US to step into.
    The most expensive and irreplaceable element in a jet fighter is the human pilot.
    In the end, when the US is gone, Taiwan will rejoin China because China will make it an attractive proposition.
    A sea-land invasion is "so old world"

    • @kl9518
      @kl9518 14 днів тому

      Just like the Terracotta Army.

  • @dsc0273
    @dsc0273 14 днів тому

    Thanks Kevin

  • @DailyBeatings
    @DailyBeatings 14 днів тому +2

    Modern warfare will be fought with drones, missiles, and AI. China has absolute advantage in two of these...

  • @Kenny-vd5cw
    @Kenny-vd5cw 14 днів тому

    productivity was is and always will be the key.

  • @silversurfer8237
    @silversurfer8237 14 днів тому +1

    The G.I. Joe movies showed lots of drone warfare in 2009 and 2013. One would have thought the US military would be extensively using drones in their operations. It sounds like the PLA are bigger fans of the G.I. Joe movies.

  • @ayadealjanabi1544
    @ayadealjanabi1544 14 днів тому +7

    As always, another fantastic video. Fast becoming my goto channel for updates from the east 👍

  • @benjaminnguyen554
    @benjaminnguyen554 14 днів тому +3

    lol the rules of engagement are hilarious 😎

  • @scott331
    @scott331 14 днів тому +3

    So, the Clone wars has begun 😂😂 Next 3, RoboCop, then the X-Wing fighter, and Millennium Falcon😂😂

  • @davidhuynh5010
    @davidhuynh5010 12 днів тому

    A wise man. THEY need to listen to you.

  • @weewahgan6922
    @weewahgan6922 14 днів тому

    Thanks for the brief.

  • @hocyrusgreat9324
    @hocyrusgreat9324 5 днів тому

    First millennium is about individualism. Second millennium is about cooperation.

  • @xushenxin
    @xushenxin 14 днів тому +1

    If it is lower cost, then it means defense contractors will get less money. This is not allowed to happen.

  • @softde
    @softde 14 днів тому +1

    thank you Kevin for speaking the truth

  • @firstlast-pt5pp
    @firstlast-pt5pp 14 днів тому

    @5:22 - cheap and fast - that's the problem

  • @JAREDPLY1
    @JAREDPLY1 14 днів тому +5

    China, Russia, Iran and NK are a defacto military alliance, 3 of the 4 have nuclear weapons and all have great military industrial capacity. The reason being is their government control, at an instant they can produce military equipment and ammunition that is cheaper and competent on the battlefield if war escalates. The US military can no longer rely on accuracy and better performing equipment if they are being destroyed by the sheer volume of drones and artillery, ships and missiles. The US MIC cannot compete, they just don't have enough capacity.

    • @adamiskandar5107
      @adamiskandar5107 14 днів тому

      How I wish they realized that and rationally stop all their warmongering. Almost all military conflicts around the world would stop if the hegemon "convert their swords into plowshares".

    • @hanmi1216
      @hanmi1216 14 днів тому

      "Rely on accuracy and better performing? " That's an oxymoron with the US military....
      Accuracy? They can't even shoot down a balloon in the first shot using the so-called the best missile in the world.... Better performing? Just look at F35, never go to war but fall a lot....

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 14 днів тому

      Iran may have nuclear weapons, and should be treated as such. Having strong industrial base means that they don't need government control - they can pivot quickly simply by virtue of knowing how to build things efficiently.

    • @bemmychan1518
      @bemmychan1518 13 днів тому

      Meanwhile the US are destroying it's economy and dollars hegemony...

  • @panyaboonc5621
    @panyaboonc5621 14 днів тому +1

    US should ask China to build for them.

  • @pgdog888
    @pgdog888 14 днів тому +2

    America just talks alot now days. But nothing to show for. A legit paper tiger.

  • @Realist-sh3dg
    @Realist-sh3dg 14 днів тому +2

    According to Winston Churchill Generals and Admirals plan for the last war. The US is still planning and building for another WWII.

  • @donhuang9855
    @donhuang9855 13 днів тому +1

    That is a big mistake to make as you don’t compete on something where China has a distinct comparative advantage over the USA in this area, given that China can out manufacture weaponized drones in larger qualities, more cheaply, more advance technically, integrated with satellite-enabled real-time services, and embedded with anti-disruptive software.

  • @user-ej6sk1tu2u
    @user-ej6sk1tu2u 14 днів тому +2

    Thank you for your clear and slow English. Of course also for the content of your videos that explain many facts regarding the new rolle of China in the world, usually forgotten or misrepresented by the main stream media.

  • @willsteiner8021
    @willsteiner8021 3 дні тому

    Amazing

  • @liamporter1137
    @liamporter1137 14 днів тому +1

    Thanks for sharing and surfacing the truth. 👏👍

  • @yangtianyi9563
    @yangtianyi9563 14 днів тому

    The problem is our military drones are 10 times cheaper and 5 times better.

  • @ulooqulg
    @ulooqulg 10 днів тому

    They already built a dedicated UAV CARRIER , multiple UAV copter motherships... LoL.

  • @yaoypl
    @yaoypl 14 днів тому +1

    The US Air Force pays $90,000 for a package of bushings that normally costs well under $100 🤣🤣🤣

  • @abstragento0087
    @abstragento0087 14 днів тому

    A opportunity to start building them by the state focused on quality instead of profit

  • @flagpole974
    @flagpole974 14 днів тому

    There are 3 fitms just in central texas building small uas systems- i personally have built some of these systems as a precision welder

  • @Ace1000ks19751982
    @Ace1000ks19751982 14 днів тому +1

    China has a giant industrial capacity, I am sure they can build millions of drones while the US can build thousands of drones. LOL

  • @user-br9oi2sh7o
    @user-br9oi2sh7o 14 днів тому +1

    The US can ask its Favorite Allies India to hep producing it by giving them the Blue Print and the Indian will be far too happy to do that so they can make a copy and wouldn't worry about copy rights if the US wants to sue. That's a WIN-WIN situation, one gets the products at cheaper prices and the other can save time on research. Go ahead!

  • @davidrichards1741
    @davidrichards1741 14 днів тому +2

    Haha, China could build them, for a tenth of the cost of the US with infinitely better quality

  • @martinwilby8942
    @martinwilby8942 14 днів тому +1

    be good

  • @jameskpaywilliams4865
    @jameskpaywilliams4865 14 днів тому +1

    Chinese experts are are everywhere.

  • @davidlim5
    @davidlim5 14 днів тому +1

    Kevin. US Navy no one building for them? Why? US can't pay!!!

  • @ButchCassidyAndSundanceKid
    @ButchCassidyAndSundanceKid 5 днів тому +1

    I remember when the U.S. shot down the Chinese "spy" balloon, it used an AIM-9X Sidewinder fired by the F-22 Raptor, the balloon probably cost the Chinese peanuts to make. The Chinese must be laughing.

  • @AIPretendingToBeHuman
    @AIPretendingToBeHuman 14 днів тому +1

    So US military spending is 10x of Russia's. Given the US's military track record against the Houthis, the Afghans, the Vietnamese, the North Koreans, it would be tough to argue we're getting our money's worth. What I'm really wondering is what the Chinese are getting for their military spending. They don't seem to be a wasteful people.

  • @alko_xo
    @alko_xo 13 днів тому

    Wait, are you saying that the F-35 is not a Wunderwaffe?!

  • @CK-jo9im
    @CK-jo9im 11 днів тому +1

    I am an African, I think what the US only best is weapons, weapons and weapons. Nothing good for humanity, not so?

  • @user-mk4fh2fq7p
    @user-mk4fh2fq7p 14 днів тому +20

    The military race could be a lot closer and narrowing. China is way more productive and being more militarily innovative.

    • @under18fearless
      @under18fearless 14 днів тому

      China’s military industrial complex is less corrupted than the US military industrial complex. China gets 90 cents to a dollar but US only get 10 cents to a dollar spent. Thus US military equipments is 9 times more expansive than a Chinese equivalent.

  • @MrStevemur
    @MrStevemur 14 днів тому +4

    News articles often cite the number of aircraft carriers as though that measures the whole strength of a country's military. There'll be a whole article about the US and China tussling over Taiwan, and the military comparison will be just one statistic: the US has 11 aircraft carriers and China has 3.

    • @wangleo6788
      @wangleo6788 14 днів тому

      航母的作战半径算400km,如果是台海战争,中国大陆距离台湾的一百多公里,可以认为中国有个上万平方公里的航母在台湾岛旁边。。。

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 14 днів тому

      The West still thinks it's WW2, when carriers ruled the seas. Admitting that carriers are useless against China would make them look bad.

  • @alanfing639
    @alanfing639 14 днів тому +1

    yep, im starting to see that,with good people like you, i guess we have to hit bottom , for a long time.that might be a good thing

  • @piay9647
    @piay9647 14 днів тому

    these era is retrofitting techs from early innovations adaptation

  • @BarbarosGunes
    @BarbarosGunes 14 днів тому +1

    Yes, boeing, general dynamics or lockheed martin manufacture the drones, each for a few million dollars 😁

  • @wnklee6878
    @wnklee6878 14 днів тому +1

    The US wants to build back better.

  • @user-vp6vf8wm2s
    @user-vp6vf8wm2s 14 днів тому +3

    Americans are always ahead, in talking, yaba yabi yab yab going nowhere

  • @tompell3032
    @tompell3032 14 днів тому +1

    the Navy can always ask DJI to build them.

  • @DragonYang01
    @DragonYang01 14 днів тому

    If the cost to win a bid on a military project from US government is 10x higher than the size of the program, nobody would be interested in even bidding on it. Many commercial companies have internal practice not to take US government money. Once you take government's money, the accounting requirements by government may cause so much more, defeating the purpose of getting any money from them.

  • @duileyah
    @duileyah 14 днів тому +1

    Maybe the US should ask China if they want to manufacture these drones for them.....I mean, they'ver asked for dumber shit.

  • @raygan777able
    @raygan777able 14 днів тому +2

    3M for a drone? Gosh. China can build 30 of the same with that.

    • @bemmychan1518
      @bemmychan1518 13 днів тому

      300 more like... 😂😂😂😂

  • @piay9647
    @piay9647 14 днів тому +1

    they're tasting their own meds... greedsowgreed

  • @redeoghan
    @redeoghan 14 днів тому

    They can't charge stupid amounts per drone without raising eyebrows.

  • @davidaaa3523
    @davidaaa3523 14 днів тому

    The US Navy can always buy Made-In-China at their local Toys-R-Us store

  • @TheRealMcCoyAndChipsAhoy
    @TheRealMcCoyAndChipsAhoy 14 днів тому +1

    WAR WAR WAR....it's all they care about.. It's madness !

  • @maggiechan33
    @maggiechan33 14 днів тому

    Appreciate your dry humor: "...we'll run out of money before the Houthis do".

  • @chaoskid1211
    @chaoskid1211 9 днів тому

    Lol. Good luck Ghina. Meanwhile, you dont have 1 blue water naval ship. Lol

  • @jimmielin1141
    @jimmielin1141 14 днів тому +3

    CH 4, the Chinese equivalent to American reaper drone only Costs 3 million dollars so there’s that.

    • @kenw.4539
      @kenw.4539 14 днів тому +1

      Yep, vertically integrated manufacturing like BYD.

  • @RePete02
    @RePete02 13 днів тому

    It's difficult to imagine the number of small, fast and lethal under sea drones China is capable of utilizing very quickly in the Taiwan Strait or anywhere else in their own back yard. Remember, one does not have to sink an enemy combatant's ship or submarine, only put it out of action. An aircraft carrier is useless unless it can launch and recover aircraft. It's very hard to fight when you're busy pumping and patching a badly listing ship. Drones of all types by the thousands and missiles of all sorts are the mainstay of today's warfare.