Interesting subject, but I would like to add, that through Christian beliefs the abolishment of slavery happened, no other religion wanted to stop the practice and yet England in 1808 started to systematically stop all exports of slaves using its Naval which was considered the best in the world at the time. England also paid reparations and it took over 200 years to pay. Check uk reparations in google. If it was not for the England This discussion forum would not exist.
People should have a choice to believe in whatever they want to believe in. It is sad that a particular religion decides death should be an appropriate punishment should one decide to not believe in it anymore.
The repugnancy of extreme religion. No one ever speaks of the degeneracy of the religion itself, the treatment of women, and the treatment of dissidents.
Some of you have apparently grown conceited enough to think that I should not visit you. But please God it will not be long before I do come in person. Then I shall be able to see what power, apart from their words, these pretentious ones among you really possess. For the kingdom of God is not a matter of a spate of word but of the power of Christian living.
Even if that were the case, luckily freedom of religion is not a concept invented or defined by the supreme court. People can even engage in legally protected activism with the goal of a more democratic polity and abolishing the supreme court.
Yes it has. There’s plenty of precedent to support that statement. Removing teachers ability to force kids to pray in public schools is a great example from 1962.
They are the same thing. The right for you not to perform salat and heed the adhan is the same right I have to not genuflect to your imaginary crucifix shishkebab. They are _exactly_ the same thing. Your right to practice your religion without influence from others is the same right I have to practice none at all without influence from others. Freedom of religion is about the demands of others. You do not get to demand I participate or respect yours. It's notable that you don't understand this simple concept.
@@TagSpamCop You're clueless. No one is demanding you participate in their approved religion when they express it in public. So someone praying after a sporting event is in no way forcing you to participate. You can walk away or you can cover your ears in a juvenile manner that no doubt suits you.
But many people appear to interpret it as the right never to be reminded that religion exists, and the right to forbid people to mention it outside their own four walls
No, it's the right that if you tell us a magical space wizard exists, we can say "I don't believe you," and articulate why. If you shut up about gods, we'll shut up about why your claim doesn't make sense. That's literally the point of secularism. Those are your beliefs. I don't have to participate in or respect them. Any more than you have to participate in Islam haram/halal compliance, or salat (prayer). If you expect to receive different treatment for your religion than you show for other religions, then you need to ask yourself why. You're an atheist about thousands of other gods.
"Psychiatric Hospital" is nothing but a sugarcoated p.c. term. Anyone with average intelligence or above average intelligence aren't fooled by this dishonest modern term. As horrible as the old terms "Insane Asylum", "Crazy House", "Mad House", "Nut House", "Loony Bin" & "Funny Farm" are at least they're honest.
Sarah Haider is a great force for good. Her work is incredibly important.
Thank you Sarah. You've always been an inspiration and I'm sorry things have been getting so hopeless. Please don't give up. We need people like you.
It's always nice to hear you speak Sarah ❤️
Extremely intelligent spokesperson for the good.
Sarah Haider is very good choice of spokesperson for this movement
Very happy to see this EXMNA and FAIR crossover. I donate to both.
Such a brave, amazing, inspiring woman. ❤
Love to Sarah. She's empowering others to break free from religious persecution.
Interesting subject, but I would like to add, that through Christian beliefs the abolishment of slavery happened, no other religion wanted to stop the practice and yet England in 1808 started to systematically stop all exports of slaves using its Naval which was considered the best in the world at the time. England also paid reparations and it took over 200 years to pay. Check uk reparations in google. If it was not for the England This discussion forum would not exist.
Very nice and good visions
Very well said.
Love to this organization and all its people.
That's not what it means. That's what it includes. Big difference.
People should have a choice to believe in whatever they want to believe in. It is sad that a particular religion decides death should be an appropriate punishment should one decide to not believe in it anymore.
👍
I need it help and support
SH is attractive.
Just don't spread ignorance and Muslim stereotypes... freedom from that as well.
This would have been a great pregaU video 😂😂
The repugnancy of extreme religion. No one ever speaks of the degeneracy of the religion itself, the treatment of women, and the treatment of dissidents.
Some of you have apparently grown conceited enough to think that I should not visit you. But please God it will not be long before I do come in person. Then I shall be able to see what power, apart from their words, these pretentious ones among you really possess. For the kingdom of God is not a matter of a spate of word but of the power of Christian living.
"Freedom of Religion Means Respecting the Right To Be Without It" U.S. Supreme court has never held you being without religion has to be respected.
Even if that were the case, luckily freedom of religion is not a concept invented or defined by the supreme court. People can even engage in legally protected activism with the goal of a more democratic polity and abolishing the supreme court.
Yes it has. There’s plenty of precedent to support that statement. Removing teachers ability to force kids to pray in public schools is a great example from 1962.
The founding fathers intended freedom of religion, not freedom from religion
They are the same thing. The right for you not to perform salat and heed the adhan is the same right I have to not genuflect to your imaginary crucifix shishkebab. They are _exactly_ the same thing. Your right to practice your religion without influence from others is the same right I have to practice none at all without influence from others. Freedom of religion is about the demands of others. You do not get to demand I participate or respect yours. It's notable that you don't understand this simple concept.
@@TagSpamCop You're clueless. No one is demanding you participate in their approved religion when they express it in public. So someone praying after a sporting event is in no way forcing you to participate. You can walk away or you can cover your ears in a juvenile manner that no doubt suits you.
AND freedom from religion
But many people appear to interpret it as the right never to be reminded that religion exists, and the right to forbid people to mention it outside their own four walls
No, it's the right that if you tell us a magical space wizard exists, we can say "I don't believe you," and articulate why. If you shut up about gods, we'll shut up about why your claim doesn't make sense. That's literally the point of secularism. Those are your beliefs. I don't have to participate in or respect them. Any more than you have to participate in Islam haram/halal compliance, or salat (prayer). If you expect to receive different treatment for your religion than you show for other religions, then you need to ask yourself why. You're an atheist about thousands of other gods.
"Psychiatric Hospital" is nothing but a sugarcoated p.c. term. Anyone with average intelligence or above average intelligence aren't fooled by this dishonest modern term. As horrible as the old terms "Insane Asylum", "Crazy House", "Mad House", "Nut House", "Loony Bin" & "Funny Farm" are at least they're honest.
No. I hope that's ironic rather than simply dumb.
@@michaelqdlap I take you've personally never been incarcerated(voluntarily or involuntarily) in such a place
@@goldenvulture6818 No, but I've worked in one. Does it matter?
@@michaelqdlap Yes it does
I appreciate Sarah. Go ahead with the truths