Everytime I see the old ECAM I'm fascinated by how good their design of the system graphics was so that they had to change so little over all those years.
honestly for high passenger routes that consistently fill a a320 that last for about 45 mins-2 hours I reckon a a310 would be perfect but a modern version. Was a great plane just came too early
Actually they took of in Flex mode, with autothrust engaged. The throttle moves automatically in the A310 and the pilot only holds his hand on it. He only has to move it manually to~40% N1, then he presses TOGA and the rest of the take-off and climb is in auto. You can see the green "autothrust" light on the left side of MCP (below their selected speed - '256') turned on when they start to accelerate.
I remember flying on one of these A310’s. Is the fuel reading in kilograms or pounds? The A310’s I flew on were listed in pounds. According the the fuel readout at flight level 15,000 feet and climbing , the amount of fuel on board was under 29,000. If that’s in pound, that cutting it close in the distance they have to travel even with a excellent tailwind.
@@plsniper Good for you. I'm a retired employee who worked for an airline that had mainly an all Airbus fleet. Well over 15k pilots, and not 1 ever told me they hated their airplane.
@@TWA-km9wt I worked for Delta. Had both, Boeings and Airbuses. All pilots loved Boeings. Not all liked airbuses. :) Pilots usually like to have a direct control of an aircraft. They don't like the computers deciding weather to let the pilot do something or not.
@@plsniper Well like I said, I never met 1 pilot who didn't like the Airbus, and we flew every variant of the aircraft, from the A319- A340. In fact they loved the aircraft. I find it hard to fathom that any pilot who doesn't like the airplane he/she is flying, would continue flying it, especially when they're flying hundreds of passengers, whose safety they are responsible for.
@@Capt_Ahmed.Ibrahim No, the gear up command was at the right time. But the FO called 'positive rate' when the aircraft was still on the ground, and the VSI was indicating 100 ft/min or so due to the nose rotating (but again, aircraft was still on the ground). That's why you're not meant to call positive rate until the VS increases to over 500/600 fpm.
Gear up command is perfectly fine. It can come as early as the screen height. What is the point of keeping it down? you will not be able to put your nose back down and land on the RWY in case of dual engine failure. And this on the other hand, is pretty much unlikely anyways. Keeping the gear up longer just produces unnecessary drag, especially if you suddenly happen to have just one engine. I agree with Ben Kolbeck, the positive climb call was definitely too early. But the gear up absolutely fine
It has a retro feeling to it with the old Airbus user interface and analog gauges
WOW!! Airbus with a yoke...sweet...
It has a body of a airbus plane but it has a cocpit of a boeing plane
Infinite flight player no
The a300 and a310 are the only airbus aircrafts with a yoke. They started using the sidestick when developing the fly by wire system for the a320
@@sebastianbernabe3800 yes i remember the crash with that Ai France plane..
This is old airbus, maybe?
Everytime I see the old ECAM I'm fascinated by how good their design of the system graphics was so that they had to change so little over all those years.
Such an overpowered plane, yet super efficient for it's time in the early 80s. Look how quickly that altimeter is spinning.
honestly for high passenger routes that consistently fill a a320 that last for about 45 mins-2 hours I reckon a a310 would be perfect but a modern version. Was a great plane just came too early
3500 fpm at 250 kts is impressive for its era
This is so awesome! I live close enough to KBOS to see planes heading for 4L / 4R. This is great to see this perspective of my home airport!
positive climb...... maybe from the cockpit
Yep... good job the capt waited until they were actually in the air to call gear up
Uh, yeah, I figured someone else may have noticed that... Waiting to be off the ground is a good thing before gear up.
@@Spyke-lz2hl 😂😂😂
Microsoft flight sim and ini builds did a great job re-creating this air craft.
Yes it’s my go to aircraft to fly
@@matthumphrey8774 I disagree somewhat, the cockpit sounds are horrible. I also don't like the forward fuselage.
Sensational Video JustPlanes Team! Liked
I love how she doubled check his response ❤ amazing work guys 🎊 ❤
V1.... Rotatepositiveclimb
What a nice flight. Sad not see much of this bus in the air anymore
Absolutely wonderful..love it, thanks for the post
thanks a lot. at least one video of a310 showing instruments in a good quality.
wow nice team work on both Pilot
Que Vídeo Maravilhoso Amo o Airbus A310 Parabenizar
Awesome
Great video!
Great take off!
Think piolets are amazing ..think this channel is amazing. .thanku. .love an god bless x
Good climb performance.
Indeed! Don't see that kind of climb performance going past 20,000 these days. I did hear that the A310 was known for it's performance.
Why is it that this channels videos almost never picks up the engines spool and throttle up?
Good old plane ! 😁😍
Muito legal!
Is this the same plane that did the hard landing?
where is this glorious accent from?
320 kias during climb wow
Oh,cockpit like MD-82:))
"Autobrake? AUTOBRAKE??"
Interesting they took off with manual thrust control and were flying manual for the first few minutes
Actually they took of in Flex mode, with autothrust engaged. The throttle moves automatically in the A310 and the pilot only holds his hand on it. He only has to move it manually to~40% N1, then he presses TOGA and the rest of the take-off and climb is in auto. You can see the green "autothrust" light on the left side of MCP (below their selected speed - '256') turned on when they start to accelerate.
I remember flying on one of these A310’s. Is the fuel reading in kilograms or pounds? The A310’s I flew on were listed in pounds. According the the fuel readout at flight level 15,000 feet and climbing , the amount of fuel on board was under 29,000. If that’s in pound, that cutting it close in the distance they have to travel even with a excellent tailwind.
Dude u realise airlines can choose the metric system, right ... Since this is a Portuguese airliner, u guess
.. Its in kg's ...
Can someone plz explain why the engine throttles were moving up by themselves at take off thanks
I think they used autothrottle during takeoff. So autopilot.
Because why not
@@FSstefan7 oh TOGA make sense thank you
@@davehagen2540 I just watched a vid about that, thank you
@@diogopinto9462 lol
how there is negative alt?
I wish Airbus would have kept yokes instead of going to side sticks.
I like how they requested FL230 from the controller and ended up having cleared to FL320 instead.
Just Planes do once something with Afghanistan flying Kam Air or Ariana Afghan Airlines or a flight to OAKB with THY for example, please
I really like the A300 and A310. Any other Airbus I can't stand. That side stick crap and over computerized cockpit is not for me.
Well, it's very well liked by pilots.
@@TWA-km9wt LOL, no, I do not agree.
@@plsniper
Good for you. I'm a retired employee who worked for an airline that had mainly an all Airbus fleet. Well over 15k pilots, and not 1 ever told me they hated their airplane.
@@TWA-km9wt I worked for Delta. Had both, Boeings and Airbuses. All pilots loved Boeings. Not all liked airbuses. :) Pilots usually like to have a direct control of an aircraft. They don't like the computers deciding weather to let the pilot do something or not.
@@plsniper
Well like I said, I never met 1 pilot who didn't like the Airbus, and we flew every variant of the aircraft, from the A319- A340. In fact they loved the aircraft. I find it hard to fathom that any pilot who doesn't like the airplane he/she is flying, would continue flying it, especially when they're flying hundreds of passengers, whose safety they are responsible for.
interesting to note that the a310 doesnt have a side stick but a actual control column
The original A300/310 aircraft were designed in the 70's, way before the fly by wire new technology A318/A320/330/340 variants.
Hii
Hilarious reading 15yo gamers commenting on the flight ops competency of a highly professional crew.
Oque me deixa triste é saber que nunca vou fazer isso
no altitude, v/s tape on PFD eh...
103% of N1 on climb at FL110????!!!!!! I can't understand that! (And take off power at 98%)
because 98% N1 at takeoff roll will consume more fuel than 103% N1 at FL110
wait some seconds before positive climb..
I love the Airbus fleet of aircraft. Got to fly in a A300 a few times with TAA / Australian Airlines.
2003 wasnt actually that long ago
2013?
awesome
Nice old-School aircraft
r-r-r-r-rotate
Positive climb called way too early... sloppy mistake from a commercial pilot
I was thinking the same... When I flew I always waited several seconds to make sure the airplane really maintains a positive rate.
I think beacouse he is a pilot and he flied too much so he know that the plane is flied and he can take the action of gear up
@@Capt_Ahmed.Ibrahim No, the gear up command was at the right time. But the FO called 'positive rate' when the aircraft was still on the ground, and the VSI was indicating 100 ft/min or so due to the nose rotating (but again, aircraft was still on the ground). That's why you're not meant to call positive rate until the VS increases to over 500/600 fpm.
Gear up command is perfectly fine. It can come as early as the screen height. What is the point of keeping it down? you will not be able to put your nose back down and land on the RWY in case of dual engine failure. And this on the other hand, is pretty much unlikely anyways. Keeping the gear up longer just produces unnecessary drag, especially if you suddenly happen to have just one engine. I agree with Ben Kolbeck, the positive climb call was definitely too early. But the gear up absolutely fine
I totally missed that. She called it out of habit, without checking.
Boeing Sounds This Airbus
Its safer because its an Airbus ..
When Airbus actually built planes....
uhm what
Yoke is a stupid invention ever created, thank god airbus moving to sidestick