Great video. For me I just picked up the PO in black 8900 movement, 43.5 and love it. I was bringing my SMP 300m 2254.50 in for service and just couldn’t resist. I love the size and movement.
Haha...I couldn't wait to get home to check out your video. I managed to sneak it in at work. Another good video, Dan. I'm really enjoying your channel so far. Of those 2 I'd have to go with the LM. There are many reasons for this choice, with the main ones being size and the open 6 and 9 numerals on the LM. Those open numerals are a nice nod to the first gen PO. All the best!
I have a first generation PO chronograph and just picked up the new PO without a chronograph. I prefer the new one, as I like the new numeral font, improved bezel (worlds better), new crown and He escape valve, upgraded movement (worlds better), bracelet (worlds better), etc. I do prefer the old steel case back (I don’t really like display backs), and the old second hand which I hadn’t noticed until you pointed it out. I also prefer the uniform lume color of the older POs. My older PO chronograph is a 46mm behemoth that I honestly don’t have the wrist size for, and it doesn’t get worn.
The first gen Chrono is a beast! I could never get one with the weird dial layout and date window. I agree that the new one is a huge upgrade on the first gen, but my PO really was the sweetspot as it were. Enjoy your new watch! 😁
Even with the endlinks on the 2500, it still wears better due to thickness. The 8500s are too top heavy. The first 8500 with the matt ceramic bezel and matt Black dial would be my 2nd pick... if it were thinner. Slim wristed guys would be limited to the 2500 versions. Having worn a standard orange PO 2500 for 10 years, I would say its a great weekender but as I've aged I wore it less. I feel the newer ones lost the elegance and smart casual appeal and went full shiny tool watch. The smp300m 2500 ceramic is a more cost effective sample of the glossy dial/ceramic bezel and dressy diver. But for me its more common, not a fan of skeleton hands or the lack of taper on the bracelet. Bought and sold but a solid watch. The 2020 smp300s have crossed into the same big shiny tool aesthetics of the newer POs, an overlap. Omega have vacated the dress diver space and left it to the sub. I tried on the 2020 sub and its ok but i did see it under the indoor lights, the LEPO and sub don't look at there best then. The sub bracelet and claps have lost its elegance and the watch is too common, esp with the fakes out there, it nice but really did little for me in person. The first ceramic subs are too boxy. The older non ceramic subs have the proportions but not the sturdiness or tech/materials. So, after looking at blancpain as well (bathyscaphe is stunning in person but only a 40mm version would do, the dial is one of the best) my conclusion is this. This PO limited edition liquidmetal is the perfect dressy diver (for me). The hands have the elegance, the visual effect is amazing, esp in natural light. The design more timeless than the newer models and it has enough visual interest vs something like the sub. It honestly still looks better than anything new I have seen in person for the last decade. It seems to go with everything I wear. In 10 years I have seem plenty of planet oceans (more 2500s) but never seen someone with the limited edition on. Sure it commands a premium but its reasonable compared to the sub at retail or any of the newer POs. If you gave me 2020 sub at retail I would sell it on for this. I managed to pick up a mint example last week. Its a keeper for sure. It'll get noticed for its looks and not the brand name. I have got the perfect fit for me in hot and cold weather without needing to resize, although an upgrade to the newer omega clasp is possible. They do come up for sale now and then, so anyone looking for a smart diver I wouldn't hesitate.
I disagree. The older PO's only appear flatter and less top heavy, but they have that protruding case back which does not allow the watch to sit flat on your wrist. The 2500's actually sit higher on the wrist and wobble more if you add lack of micro adjustable clasp. Female vs Male end links is an acquired taste, once your eyes get used to one version, the other starts to look odd.
Agreed that the 8900 is a superior movement in everyway, but aesthetics often count for more when choosing a watch. In that respect the LE trumps it IMHO.
@@TheSurreyWatchGuy True. It all comes down to personal taste, and design is in that respect very important. I personally like both, but admittedly prefer the 8900 because of the movement (and the fact you can see it!). Whichever a person prefers. Both are great choices!
@@TheSurreyWatchGuy that’s interesting, I find the 8900 better aesthetically, particularly the indices, I like that they’re a bit squarer. One of the best things about watches, there’s something for everyone
The liquid metal is in my opinion the best ever planet ocean released. The size, weight, deep gloss black dial and red text and second hand contrast is brilliant. Also the Lume being all one colour is another plus, not a fan of multi coloured lume....
Only the blue bezel and dial titanium PO with the 8500 movement has a liquidmetal bezel. The others have matte ceramic. The watch in this review is 8900. Different generation.
Mine is a 2017 had a big f on with it no adjustment clasp pis poor fit had to buy 1 ,my strap 18 mm new model 19 mm got the 6 adjust clasp with diver exstion no it was pop in out so had to get it with out still feeling wrong have a lush blue golden eye fits fabulous the po is just 2 hi 16mm don't like the new 43 8900 2 bright
@@granto6738 It 100% isn't. www.omegawatches.com/en-gb/watch-omega-seamaster-planet-ocean-600m-omega-co-axial-42-mm-23230422101001 No liquidmetal here fella.
No micro adjustment clasp on them I have 42 mm skyfall had 2 buy 1 f total headache don't no y omega waited so long I even email the CEO of omega no reply ,don't no if I would have va other plaint ocean have va quarts blue diver 300 fabulous, bit pissed off with omega
The Skyfall is 8500.The micro adjust came out on the 8900 version. You can get the clasp to fit yours if you so wish. See this link forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?450103-Omega-Micro-Adjustable-Clasp
Great video. For me I just picked up the PO in black 8900 movement, 43.5 and love it.
I was bringing my SMP 300m 2254.50 in for service and just couldn’t resist. I love the size and movement.
Brought the 8900, love it, wear it every day. Imo, its a perfect time machine. Liked and subscribed. John
Haha...I couldn't wait to get home to check out your video. I managed to sneak it in at work.
Another good video, Dan. I'm really enjoying your channel so far.
Of those 2 I'd have to go with the LM. There are many reasons for this choice, with the main ones being size and the open 6 and 9 numerals on the LM. Those open numerals are a nice nod to the first gen PO.
All the best!
Cheers René! I agree completely. The only pluses with the current gen is the better movement and re designed end links.
Both are great - whichever you choose - it's the right choice. PS just purchased the 8900 calibre in black
You made a mistake, the lug to lug length of the PO 8900 is 49 mm, not 52.5 mm.
You're 100% correct sir. I got my measurements mixed up.
I have a first generation PO chronograph and just picked up the new PO without a chronograph. I prefer the new one, as I like the new numeral font, improved bezel (worlds better), new crown and He escape valve, upgraded movement (worlds better), bracelet (worlds better), etc. I do prefer the old steel case back (I don’t really like display backs), and the old second hand which I hadn’t noticed until you pointed it out. I also prefer the uniform lume color of the older POs. My older PO chronograph is a 46mm behemoth that I honestly don’t have the wrist size for, and it doesn’t get worn.
The first gen Chrono is a beast! I could never get one with the weird dial layout and date window. I agree that the new one is a huge upgrade on the first gen, but my PO really was the sweetspot as it were. Enjoy your new watch! 😁
I bought the new Planet Ocean 43.5mm 8900 movement. Lovely watch.
Great choice.Enjoy in good health.
Which colour dial did u choose...
@@davidarchangels6500 The black one was my watch at the time.
Even with the endlinks on the 2500, it still wears better due to thickness. The 8500s are too top heavy.
The first 8500 with the matt ceramic bezel and matt Black dial would be my 2nd pick... if it were thinner. Slim wristed guys would be limited to the 2500 versions.
Having worn a standard orange PO 2500 for 10 years, I would say its a great weekender but as I've aged I wore it less.
I feel the newer ones lost the elegance and smart casual appeal and went full shiny tool watch.
The smp300m 2500 ceramic is a more cost effective sample of the glossy dial/ceramic bezel and dressy diver. But for me its more common, not a fan of skeleton hands or the lack of taper on the bracelet. Bought and sold but a solid watch.
The 2020 smp300s have crossed into the same big shiny tool aesthetics of the newer POs, an overlap.
Omega have vacated the dress diver space and left it to the sub.
I tried on the 2020 sub and its ok but i did see it under the indoor lights, the LEPO and sub don't look at there best then. The sub bracelet and claps have lost its elegance and the watch is too common, esp with the fakes out there, it nice but really did little for me in person.
The first ceramic subs are too boxy.
The older non ceramic subs have the proportions but not the sturdiness or tech/materials.
So, after looking at blancpain as well (bathyscaphe is stunning in person but only a 40mm version would do, the dial is one of the best) my conclusion is this.
This PO limited edition liquidmetal is the perfect dressy diver (for me). The hands have the elegance, the visual effect is amazing, esp in natural light. The design more timeless than the newer models and it has enough visual interest vs something like the sub. It honestly still looks better than anything new I have seen in person for the last decade.
It seems to go with everything I wear.
In 10 years I have seem plenty of planet oceans (more 2500s) but never seen someone with the limited edition on.
Sure it commands a premium but its reasonable compared to the sub at retail or any of the newer POs. If you gave me 2020 sub at retail I would sell it on for this.
I managed to pick up a mint example last week. Its a keeper for sure. It'll get noticed for its looks and not the brand name.
I have got the perfect fit for me in hot and cold weather without needing to resize, although an upgrade to the newer omega clasp is possible.
They do come up for sale now and then, so anyone looking for a smart diver I wouldn't hesitate.
I disagree. The older PO's only appear flatter and less top heavy, but they have that protruding case back which does not allow the watch to sit flat on your wrist. The 2500's actually sit higher on the wrist and wobble more if you add lack of micro adjustable clasp. Female vs Male end links is an acquired taste, once your eyes get used to one version, the other starts to look odd.
If you want one, try them. They both work on small wrists, when you like a big watch.@@TurnRiver
I’d say the new seamaster ‘no time
To die’ version fits right into the dress diver category perfectly. In fact I think it’s hard to beat !
Great video! Be nice to see this comparison with the very first PO
Cheers Gareth! The 2500 is the icon eh.
Liquid metal is my favourite. The open 6 and 9 😍 Both are too big for me really though.
They're quite large watches. The 39.5mm 8800 PO would probably fit though.
The 2500 is much more proportioned. 2500 for the win!
100% agree.
Exactly on point. They got it right on the first generation.
what is the difference between a Co- aixial 3800,880 and the 3500?
I love the current generation PO 😎
Love the Black One 😍 ist a Dream.
It's a sexy watch for sure.
Both are great, the liquid metal bezels are superb. But the 8900 is the superior movement
Agreed that the 8900 is a superior movement in everyway, but aesthetics often count for more when choosing a watch. In that respect the LE trumps it IMHO.
@@TheSurreyWatchGuy True. It all comes down to personal taste, and design is in that respect very important. I personally like both, but admittedly prefer the 8900 because of the movement (and the fact you can see it!).
Whichever a person prefers. Both are great choices!
@@GuyVanderAa Indeed they are. No wrong answer there.
@@TheSurreyWatchGuy that’s interesting, I find the 8900 better aesthetically, particularly the indices, I like that they’re a bit squarer. One of the best things about watches, there’s something for everyone
@@modernastronomers2596 100% differences and opinions are to be celebrated 🙂
Liquid metal all the way!
Great vid Dan
Haha! Cheers Mark.
The liquid metal is in my opinion the best ever planet ocean released. The size, weight, deep gloss black dial and red text and second hand contrast is brilliant. Also the Lume being all one colour is another plus, not a fan of multi coloured lume....
I agree with you 100% my friend 😃
Your diver extension isn't closed properly.
Black is nicer. :)
Word!
I just ordered the ceramic / titanium 39.5 black PO and now I feel stupid spending the extra money and not getting this one.
I wasn't aware of a 39.5mm ceramic and titanium PO? Can you share the reference number?
Like what you are doing.
Thanks my friend :-)
2:31 it's not zero two. It's O2, as in oxygen. Is in zirconium dioxide. One zirconium atom to two oxygen atoms.
I choose the new version planet ocean
i just got the new model. man looks like such a scratch magnet. i dont even really want to wear it
No you'll be surprised. I've had my PO almost 9 years and it's in great condition. Just enjoy the watch :-)
Put it on a strap? The ceramic and crystal won't scratch. It the ar coating gets marked you could always have it replaced at service
Why would anyone want an 'elegant' toolwatch?
Two very pedestrian watches.
So Nice 💘💘💘💘💘💘
Thanks so much.
All 8500 movement r liquid metal
Only the blue bezel and dial titanium PO with the 8500 movement has a liquidmetal bezel. The others have matte ceramic. The watch in this review is 8900. Different generation.
@@TheSurreyWatchGuy the mat is liquid metal bud trust me skyfall
Mine is a 2017 had a big f on with it no adjustment clasp pis poor fit had to buy 1 ,my strap 18 mm new model 19 mm got the 6 adjust clasp with diver exstion no it was pop in out so had to get it with out still feeling wrong have a lush blue golden eye fits fabulous the po is just 2 hi 16mm don't like the new 43 8900 2 bright
@@TheSurreyWatchGuy where u from ? I'm in Durham England
@@granto6738 It 100% isn't. www.omegawatches.com/en-gb/watch-omega-seamaster-planet-ocean-600m-omega-co-axial-42-mm-23230422101001 No liquidmetal here fella.
No micro adjustment clasp on them I have 42 mm skyfall had 2 buy 1 f total headache don't no y omega waited so long I even email the CEO of omega no reply ,don't no if I would have va other plaint ocean have va quarts blue diver 300 fabulous, bit pissed off with omega
The Skyfall is 8500.The micro adjust came out on the 8900 version. You can get the clasp to fit yours if you so wish. See this link forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?450103-Omega-Micro-Adjustable-Clasp