The problem with this is that many things can go wrong with the software, the moving parts, the cameras (imagine this in poor lighting). Sawstop relies on a physical effect that's infinitely repeatable and always happens the same way, even with things that are not your hand (conductive materials). I agree with the poster below, who said this could be combined with Sawstop technology, thus eliminating the need to replace the blade everytime it goes off, but still having that last resort backup "blade-destroying-and-finger-saving" feature. (Hoping it never goes off, of course).
They should totally collaborate! If this is cheaper I could see why places might choose this over saw stop but it would make so much more sense to prevent "dangerous acts" than wait until critical failure/maiming imminent.
This will be a way better solution than the sawstop tech that is now owned by Festool. I would imagine they will push back hard, though, as sawstop has never been known to sit by and wait. The fact that it is much faster, has an earlier reaction, isn't damaging to the blade, or requires replacement parts after activation is an absolute game changer. When you can reset the saw in seconds, and continue your work, is phenomenal! I pray they find a way to further develop this or a similar system for use with existing saws and can make it affordable for everyone.
You could probably engineer it so that sawstop is used as a back up. Though I'm hesitant to trust computer vision as much as what sawstop has (which does not excuse poor safety procedure, since both systems are not substitutes for poor safety procedures).
I agree that there are definitely a lot of benefits to a system like this, but the major drawback is the complexity of the setup. Sawstop may have an imperfect solution using one time use cartridges and destroying a blade, but by doing so it allows the solution to be put into things like jobsite saws, where setting up a camera and computer are impractical.
The problem with this is that many things can go wrong with the software, the moving parts, the cameras (imagine this in poor lighting). Sawstop relies on a physical effect that's infinitely repeatable and always happens the same way, even with things that are not your hand (conductive materials). I agree with the poster below, who said this could be combined with Sawstop technology, thus eliminating the need to replace the blade everytime it goes off, but still having that last resort backup "blade-destroying-and-finger-saving" feature. (Hoping it never goes off, of course).
They should totally collaborate! If this is cheaper I could see why places might choose this over saw stop but it would make so much more sense to prevent "dangerous acts" than wait until critical failure/maiming imminent.
I’m pretty sure they considered and addressed all of the points you made long before selling them to high school shop programs.
As long as it works more often than a tesla autopilot.
🤣🤣🤣. Tesla is probably doing better than most drivers but the standard for them has to be higher.
This will be a way better solution than the sawstop tech that is now owned by Festool. I would imagine they will push back hard, though, as sawstop has never been known to sit by and wait. The fact that it is much faster, has an earlier reaction, isn't damaging to the blade, or requires replacement parts after activation is an absolute game changer. When you can reset the saw in seconds, and continue your work, is phenomenal!
I pray they find a way to further develop this or a similar system for use with existing saws and can make it affordable for everyone.
You could probably engineer it so that sawstop is used as a back up. Though I'm hesitant to trust computer vision as much as what sawstop has (which does not excuse poor safety procedure, since both systems are not substitutes for poor safety procedures).
I agree that there are definitely a lot of benefits to a system like this, but the major drawback is the complexity of the setup. Sawstop may have an imperfect solution using one time use cartridges and destroying a blade, but by doing so it allows the solution to be put into things like jobsite saws, where setting up a camera and computer are impractical.
At 32 seconds, it loses track of the hand. I'd still trust saw stop over this.
What an improvement from hot dog blade
Whatever it takes to protect the hot dog.
@@ManCrafting lol. Long Live Hot Dog!
Wow!! Interesting 🤔!!!
I love seeing new tech. This may be for a limited few, but it’s a start for now.
It's crazy how far technology has come.
Totally. They use AI to accumulate more images over time. Currently over 90,000 in its learning library.
Keeping all 10 is always the goal ! Amazing technology.
Exactly. How’s things in the Windy City?
@@ManCrafting Couldn't be better.
What about gloves
I’d probably never where them, but I’m guessing the covered that in their 90,000 image library.
Yeah I would not trust this system lol
I would.