Supreme Court hears Trump presidential immunity claim | Special Report

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
  • The Supreme Court has concluded arguments over Donald Trump's claim he is entitled to broad immunity from federal prosecution for allegedly official acts while he was in the White House. Nancy Cordes anchored CBS News' special report on the arguments.
    #news #trump #supremecourt
    CBS News 24/7 is the premier anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations that is available free to everyone with access to the internet and is the destination for breaking news, live events, original reporting and storytelling, and programs from CBS News and Stations’ top anchors and correspondents working locally, nationally and around the globe. It is available on more than 30 platforms across mobile, desktop and connected TVs for free, as well as CBSNews.com and Paramount+ and live in 91 countries.
    Subscribe to the CBS News UA-cam channel: / cbsnews
    Watch CBS News: cbsnews.com/live/
    Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
    Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
    Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
    Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
    Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
    Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
    For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 954

  • @lang6626
    @lang6626 Місяць тому +90

    Its not a matter of Biden and Trump anymore but the future of the country

    • @PaulJackson59A
      @PaulJackson59A Місяць тому

      The Supreme Court is IMHO, in a large part corrupt. The Conservative Supremes pretend to be ORIGINALISTS, HOWEVER, they are not unless it fits their whim. The Supreme Court Judges know DAMN WELL, that our Founding Fathers did not want a Unitary Presidency, they Did Not want a Monarchy. The settlers her were in a large part those who left England because of the English Monarchy and the Devine Rights of Kings and Queens. In no reasonable way can they construe the Presidency to be a position above the law.
      Read the Federalist Papers, STOP BEING SHEEPLE!!!
      Additionally, Trump's Acts were not within the outside orbit of his power or authority. The Executive Branch has no Authority WRT to Presidential Elections. Presidents are immune to Civil Suits while holding office, not Criminal Acts. Even further a past President is not covered by Civil or Criminal immunity for unofficial acts!

    • @user-il1ky3jx7x
      @user-il1ky3jx7x Місяць тому +7

      You are soo right 👍

    • @Ech0s_1972
      @Ech0s_1972 Місяць тому +4

      100%

    • @TMerton2
      @TMerton2 Місяць тому

      T

    • @toddprifogle7381
      @toddprifogle7381 25 днів тому

      Sincerely I've been seeing it that way for some time now .

  • @KwabenaWiafe-wp6qm
    @KwabenaWiafe-wp6qm Місяць тому +33

    It's so hard and stressful listening to these arguments. Oh my God. What is wrong with the supreme court

    • @user-tf2gn2km3i
      @user-tf2gn2km3i 14 днів тому +4

      Look up federalist society and their goals . That will answer your question when you learn that 6 of the 9 are members of that society.

    • @tinasummers4578
      @tinasummers4578 2 дні тому

      Insanity

  • @rerun3283
    @rerun3283 Місяць тому +97

    Why is this even a question?

    • @PalmBalms
      @PalmBalms Місяць тому +9

      Agreed, your right it's not a question, but their sure trying to make it one

    • @kingayy9267
      @kingayy9267 Місяць тому

      Because 45 is a spoiled toddler who refuses to admit his extensive wrongdoings, and his SC cronies are willing to help him continue to avoid consequences by dragging out the case.

    • @mateomelendez3733
      @mateomelendez3733 Місяць тому +6

      I don't know why/how this is a question. But I believe in 2024, the discussion of this is just a waste of time and the taxpayers' dollars! The Justices seem to be asking good questions. I have already heard enough to respond "NO Presidential immunity! Hopefully SCOTUS will render the same decision as I did.

    • @rerun3283
      @rerun3283 Місяць тому +3

      @@mateomelendez3733 I agree!

    • @MariePerdigone
      @MariePerdigone 19 днів тому

  • @thomasjamison2050
    @thomasjamison2050 Місяць тому +155

    Will someone please ask this guy why all the other presidents were able to fully function without immunity? Maybe it was because they didn't need it to stay out of prison?

    • @marypentecost1296
      @marypentecost1296 Місяць тому +8

      Hmmmm, Mr. President Biden's behavior and that of His Administration, aspects, perhaps of Mr. President Obama make this Very Relevant.

    • @tabathak4955
      @tabathak4955 Місяць тому +3

      Or maybe bc they were all guilty also, and it would have been a domino effect.

    • @cassandratq9301
      @cassandratq9301 Місяць тому +3

      They did point that out later.

    • @johntillotson4254
      @johntillotson4254 Місяць тому +14

      The Judges are sold out

    • @wesdunn9995
      @wesdunn9995 Місяць тому

      Clinton should have been charged obama should have been arrested for drone strikes killing civilians??? Even GWB dirt on him from weapons of mass destruction that never existed period look at the facts and facts tell us they all used it

  • @Raven-si7bm
    @Raven-si7bm Місяць тому +103

    Can’t believe the court is actually hearing this.

    • @pwilki01
      @pwilki01 Місяць тому +12

      They have debased themselves.

    • @user-xj9tj7vo4t
      @user-xj9tj7vo4t Місяць тому

      They were already debased. Three lied in their senate hearings, and Thomas is still there. Worst, most corrupt SCOTUS in my 73 years.

    • @Devon1122
      @Devon1122 Місяць тому

      Entertaining it .

    • @Raven-si7bm
      @Raven-si7bm Місяць тому +8

      @@Devon1122 it’s entertainment for sure - more of a joke that the Supreme Court is promoting. Pathetic

    • @Ech0s_1972
      @Ech0s_1972 Місяць тому +5

      So corrupt

  • @RichardBrady-yc7he
    @RichardBrady-yc7he Місяць тому +47

    These right wing justices are disgraceful. Thomas and Alito in particular are lost in criminality themselves, how can they adjudicate?

  • @andrewpatten9829
    @andrewpatten9829 Місяць тому +101

    The Court took this appeal solely to delay the start of the trial. The arguments are patently absurd and baseless. It should have let the D.C. Circuit's decision stand.

    • @baikawei6540
      @baikawei6540 Місяць тому +1

      Are you for real

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 Місяць тому +16

      I agree. It's extremely damaging to its reputation and, more importantly, to the authority of the lower courts!

    • @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj
      @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Місяць тому +1

      So said you,

    • @andrewpatten9829
      @andrewpatten9829 Місяць тому +8

      @@ShelbyRadar-hb7tj yes, so said I.

    • @kingayy9267
      @kingayy9267 Місяць тому +4

      @ShelbyRadar
      Yes! They _did_ say that!
      Did you figure that out all by yourself? Wow!
      Good for you, Shelby!

  • @PP-mz4hv
    @PP-mz4hv Місяць тому +57

    Staging a coup "could be" an official act? Tuesday, November 5, 2024 will be a test of all U.S.citizens.

    • @SandraWeiss-jc6xz
      @SandraWeiss-jc6xz Місяць тому

      WRONG

    • @paigemprice
      @paigemprice Місяць тому +2

      ​@@SandraWeiss-jc6xzWhy is voting wrong?

    • @kingayy9267
      @kingayy9267 Місяць тому +6

      @paigeprice4574
      Because Fox "News" told her it was.
      It's pathetic and would be laughable if it weren't tearing America apart at the seams.

    • @kingayy9267
      @kingayy9267 Місяць тому +3

      Indeed it will be a test that the rest of the world, in addition to the responsible, intelligent majority of Americans, will be watching unfold with bated breath.

  • @jr499
    @jr499 Місяць тому +101

    It's absurd that they're even considering this. Regardless of their decision, their corruption is undeniable.

    • @PCLee345
      @PCLee345 Місяць тому +15

      In absolute agreement, this is beyond absurdity!

    • @garcia4835
      @garcia4835 Місяць тому +9

      Exactly! How can they here such a case that has a chance of making trump a dictator!

    • @Klock72
      @Klock72 Місяць тому +9

      I agree. They are setting a precedent for all future presidents when they shouldn’t have even heard it.

    • @deborahbeltz718
      @deborahbeltz718 Місяць тому +2

      ​@Klock72 they have to hear it, and they have to abide by the law !

    • @deborahbeltz718
      @deborahbeltz718 Місяць тому +1

      They are nowhere near corruption!

  • @jaymieholmes638
    @jaymieholmes638 Місяць тому +116

    absolutely not, NO ONE is ABOVE the law. NO ONE..

    • @teevee2145
      @teevee2145 Місяць тому +1

      most of us gubmint is

    • @JoeJoe-di4oj
      @JoeJoe-di4oj Місяць тому

      Donald trump is above the law. They are showing us that he is. 🤔

    • @PassdeDutchie
      @PassdeDutchie Місяць тому +2

      5th Avenue - Trump...

    • @marcontreras8932
      @marcontreras8932 Місяць тому +14

      Make America Safe Again 🙏 VOTE TRUMP

    • @writekelly
      @writekelly Місяць тому +8

      Vote dems across the board, fund education and social support as a preventative measure to help the gullible.

  • @osmargonzales6036
    @osmargonzales6036 Місяць тому +18

    So easy to see.
    Double Standard treatment.
    In your Face.
    No remorse.
    Don't care if you like it or not attitude.
    In November Vote Blue.
    Keep the MAGA extremist Cult Out!!
    Period.

  • @bek7562
    @bek7562 Місяць тому +107

    This discussion should terrify anyone, regardless of Democrat or Republican. The precedent this could set is upsetting. At this point they’re basically just saying “should a president be allowed to manipulate the country’s system in order to permanently hold power”.

    • @bek7562
      @bek7562 Місяць тому +5

      Did he JUST say “logically”, that’s like saying someone isn’t smart enough to understand he’s correct…

    • @paladro
      @paladro Місяць тому

      if this useless court deems a president immune, then biden can just jail trump as a national threat and ally of putin.

    • @rennartminott8549
      @rennartminott8549 Місяць тому

      ​@@bek75621 1
      Hi how is the nite going?

    • @user-cd3tq9ye2p
      @user-cd3tq9ye2p Місяць тому

      no

    • @gb3346
      @gb3346 Місяць тому

      If this bs doesn't drive people to the polls in droves to vote against Frump, nothing will. Even MAGA folks should be terrified of what is happening.

  • @T.Z.M4N
    @T.Z.M4N Місяць тому +126

    Why would a criminal ask for immunity if he never done nothing wrong?

    • @sharonwashington9315
      @sharonwashington9315 Місяць тому +20

      exactly, he knows he is guilty

    • @ronaldpreville1053
      @ronaldpreville1053 Місяць тому +12

      You are guilty Trump

    • @maxinemcelroy8902
      @maxinemcelroy8902 Місяць тому

      Ask obiden when he gets prosecuted for treason

    • @lizandjoey1
      @lizandjoey1 Місяць тому +8

      He has another criminal trial

    • @sddrunner
      @sddrunner Місяць тому +9

      Duh he’s being charged unlawfully figure it out.
      Go watch cartoons maybe you will get them

  • @dmann1115
    @dmann1115 Місяць тому +30

    If all the charges in the indictment are about non-official acts, which is the case, then why is the Supreme Court even getting involved in this matter?? Nobody is arguing that Trump was acting officially. The question of official vs. non-official doesn't even arise from the indictments!!! It's hard to see a legitimate legal question that made it necessary for SCOTUS to hear this case. It ends up serving only one purpose, and that is to delay the Jan. 6 case against Trump long enough to insure it won't be heard until after the election. Unforgivable.

    • @cassandratq9301
      @cassandratq9301 Місяць тому +4

      Excellent point! Aside from steering the Constitution into very dangerous waters, most T.V. lawyers seem to believe that was the intent of taking the case.

    • @katherineroth2310
      @katherineroth2310 Місяць тому +4

      The Truth will overcome. But you’re so right. That argument of public vs private acts was a complete waste of brain power to listen to. He didn’t do what a rational, responsible person would do.

  • @andrewsims1356
    @andrewsims1356 Місяць тому +15

    The biggest Chad move Biden could do is wait for the immunity and then refuse to give up the precidency 😂

    • @rogercrannell4563
      @rogercrannell4563 11 днів тому

      I'll se you there to back up what you said? U.S. vets took an oath! Are you telling me you are ready?

    • @user-tc7df1en3p
      @user-tc7df1en3p 7 днів тому

      He wouldn't know unless he is guided. We need real leadership! Trump knows how to lead. This is what Trump has done all his life. People make mistakes and so does the department of justice. We live in an imperfect world, or we wouldn't be here on this page figuring this out. Come on now!

    • @user-tc7df1en3p
      @user-tc7df1en3p 7 днів тому

      Well, with a billion dollars and 200,000 thousands coming to Joe Biden's home. I don't think so. Did Trump have checks moved from his house for such an amount. Talking about the removal of documents. Wow! Why is this ignored, it sticks in my mind. This needs justification to why Joe Biden can get away with this type of action. 😮

  • @rwarren58
    @rwarren58 Місяць тому +105

    Hey Roberts. Do you think the Supreme Court will survive once you give trump immunity to do as he wants?

    • @RR-qr8on
      @RR-qr8on Місяць тому +13

      Then Biden can do whatever he wants as well. That’ll scare all of them.

    • @JMBAmericanIronShallNotBeInfri
      @JMBAmericanIronShallNotBeInfri Місяць тому

      @@RR-qr8on Hey clueless, Biden has been doing whatever he wants, ignoring the constitution when it is useful to push his agenda that he can't get approved by congress.

    • @cassandratq9301
      @cassandratq9301 Місяць тому

      How can Roberts not see the jeopardy? One ruling that goes against a next President Trump 5-4, with Roberts being the swing vote, boom! Roberts is corruptly impeached + removed, or worse.(Remember, Trump could legally BRIBE the Congress to impeach + remove.) After that, no decision goes against Trump. This is so obvious.

    • @deannaponcho4297
      @deannaponcho4297 Місяць тому

      ​@@RR-qr8on❤❤

    • @DG-wu7ke
      @DG-wu7ke Місяць тому

      They will give Biden the right to take out selected federal judges too!

  • @rosehuber1997
    @rosehuber1997 Місяць тому +44

    No one, no one should have total immunity. Complete immunity would mean that the President is not answerable to anyone. That is not right. He is a public servant and is answerable to the American people.

    • @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj
      @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Місяць тому +2

      That's a good things you are not SCOTUS, so what you think really dont count

    • @Shineon83
      @Shineon83 Місяць тому

      NO one has it now. Do you even know what “Presidential immunity” involves? As it NOW stands, A President can NOT be prosecuted for OFFICIAL acts while in Office….However, he CAN be prosecuted for PRIVATE acts….
      MSM = A great drug

    • @ivyrose779
      @ivyrose779 Місяць тому +2

      @@Shineon83Yes, and they’re arguing to change it to complete immunity.

    • @pperk1219
      @pperk1219 Місяць тому +1

      While I disagree, I think the argument is that Congress should hold a president liable. This, of course, is contrary to what the Senate claimed in choosing not to find the president guilty of the alleged charge of impeachment.

    • @erniebrustsr7014
      @erniebrustsr7014 Місяць тому

      ONLY ON ELECTION DAY

  • @exeterline1930
    @exeterline1930 Місяць тому +81

    I hope Thomas was listening to discussion on bribery.

    • @lukie9284
      @lukie9284 Місяць тому +5

      😂 😂

    • @lukewarme9121
      @lukewarme9121 Місяць тому +1

      Thomas wasn’t involved with Burisma. Think Mr. 10% Big Guy.

    • @garyl4007
      @garyl4007 Місяць тому +3

      I think we should review black and white marriages next

    • @PalmBalms
      @PalmBalms Місяць тому +2

      I agree ,but why would he care , he enjoys taking them

    • @generalputnam2990
      @generalputnam2990 16 днів тому

      And Alito to the Fake Slates of Electors. Sidney Powell testified that he was standing by to issue s Stay of the Electoral tally certification for his DC District in ¹/6/21.

  • @hanskleinjan
    @hanskleinjan Місяць тому +17

    This is about the ultimate credibility of the Supreme Court specifically and the US in general.

    • @user-tc7df1en3p
      @user-tc7df1en3p 7 днів тому

      And understanding the real laws of the land!

  • @tjwatson2249
    @tjwatson2249 Місяць тому +60

    I’m sorry, but the whole time I’m just thinking, “dude, clear your fricken throat!”

    • @garcia4835
      @garcia4835 Місяць тому +9

      Of course the orange menaces lawyer would sound like a demon

    • @plynch9145
      @plynch9145 Місяць тому +5

      That demonic insult in The Exorcist springs to mind as an explanation.

    • @bernicehinds6154
      @bernicehinds6154 Місяць тому +3

      Lol Lol 😆

    • @jamespeters4215
      @jamespeters4215 Місяць тому +4

      @@plynch9145 sounds like that recorded voice stitched together from the future in 12 monkeys

    • @AfroHairScience
      @AfroHairScience Місяць тому +5

      I thought it was me....😂😂😂😂 I keep envisioning Froggy from the Lil Rascals.
      He ought be ashamed of himself arguing for ABSOLUTE immunity.
      Why would he arguing for immunity for the president when the THEY LEFT Europe because they hated aristocracy? 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • @markkozlowski3674
    @markkozlowski3674 Місяць тому +74

    There is simply no way this case can be decided for Trump without overthrowing the constitutional order of the United States.

    • @cajunlogicdiy
      @cajunlogicdiy Місяць тому +2

      Wrong again.

    • @pamelanesin6916
      @pamelanesin6916 Місяць тому +11

      I've watched Trump ever since I saw him go with Vladimir Putin and not want have any interpretationof what Putin and he talked about but from the look of Putin's face it was like Trump gave America to Putin

    • @cajunlogicdiy
      @cajunlogicdiy Місяць тому

      @@pamelanesin6916 Yet he didn't. So, there's that.😁

    • @michaelhalterman8144
      @michaelhalterman8144 Місяць тому

      ​@@pamelanesin6916That's a big jump in logic

    • @pamelanesin6916
      @pamelanesin6916 Місяць тому +1

      @@cajunlogicdiy who you follow the propaganda Channel like Fox ?
      I read many different sources of Free Press and I follow The Washington Post

  • @howardpoulin23
    @howardpoulin23 Місяць тому +27

    Judge Jackson is awsome!

    • @paigemprice
      @paigemprice Місяць тому +4

      KBJ is the new RBG

    • @RidingWithBiden
      @RidingWithBiden 15 днів тому +3

      I believe she is the most qualified of any of the justices. She is an amazing woman.

    • @katherineroth2310
      @katherineroth2310 14 днів тому +1

      Yes the voice of clarity

  • @LG-nm6pn
    @LG-nm6pn Місяць тому +62

    The amount of money being spent for someone whom is OBVIOUSLY guilty is disgusting

    • @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj
      @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Місяць тому +2

      You are not the judge nor jury,your statement is inappropriate.

    • @BoldlyDream
      @BoldlyDream Місяць тому

      @@ShelbyRadar-hb7tj no one needs to be judge or jury, we all saw January 6th and tRUMP doesn’t deny he took national security documents. The hearings are a formality!!!

    • @LG-nm6pn
      @LG-nm6pn Місяць тому

      @@ShelbyRadar-hb7tj And yet you’re judging my statement- the irony of it all is comical. It’s folks like you whom have and continue to stay uneducated about simple facts regarding a narcissist conman that will just complain over and over er again and do nothing. That’s what the (R) party is currently doing. NOTHING.

    • @punkswithpeacesigns
      @punkswithpeacesigns Місяць тому

      @@ShelbyRadar-hb7tj NO its not. In fact, even Trumpers as you know he is but your confirmation bias won't let you admit it. If you really believe it, then you don't be mad if Biden were to lose, he just refuses to leave office. You won't mind will you?

    • @LG-nm6pn
      @LG-nm6pn Місяць тому +4

      @@ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Get over yourself.

  • @NatalieWilsonDNP
    @NatalieWilsonDNP Місяць тому +11

    Damn!! Justice Brown-Jackson is good!!!!❤❤❤

  • @toddmurphy523
    @toddmurphy523 Місяць тому +26

    Immunity should just be a medical term, not a judicial term.

    • @lukewarme9121
      @lukewarme9121 Місяць тому

      Woman should be a female term, not a male term.

  • @johnrogers1456
    @johnrogers1456 Місяць тому +21

    The Supreme Court should never have heard this case.

    • @deborahbeltz718
      @deborahbeltz718 7 днів тому +1

      Everyone has a right to ask the grand jury to hear their CASE it is in our law.

    • @user-tc7df1en3p
      @user-tc7df1en3p 7 днів тому +1

      Why not, when " all" people are entitled to a fair trial when they believe or know that there was some wrong in the decision that concludes the case. It was more personal as stories keep changing.

  • @janedoe1229
    @janedoe1229 Місяць тому +45

    Why corrupt Clarence Thomas is seated. His wife was a participany of June 6th.

    • @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj
      @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Місяць тому +1

      To answer your question , he is seated because he is a Justice, in case you are uniform.

    • @katherineroth2310
      @katherineroth2310 Місяць тому

      Now there’s a question. Of course they can’t prove he sides with his wife, she is persuasive- she’s been able to get elected to Congress

    • @katherineroth2310
      @katherineroth2310 Місяць тому

      Hey Shelby - assume following the law. Thomas was found to have taken gifts ( not bribes but against the law) Different kinds of illusionary morality. Trump does it through his voice ad his perfection of sounding like Billy Graham while spouting whatever truths complimentary to him

    • @lukewarme9121
      @lukewarme9121 Місяць тому +2

      You watch too much Fake News.

    • @BoldlyDream
      @BoldlyDream Місяць тому +6

      @@ShelbyRadar-hb7tjThomas should have recused himself!!! Your answer is absurd.

  • @HaroldHiller
    @HaroldHiller Місяць тому +9

    This is 😢😢stupid. Why is the Supreme Court even listening to this? Makes them look stupid

  • @BlueTsunami.2024
    @BlueTsunami.2024 Місяць тому +89

    If this goes the way I think it will, then it's time for Biden to round up Seal Team 6.

    • @markkozlowski3674
      @markkozlowski3674 Місяць тому +17

      It will go 8-1 against Trump. Possibly 9-0. Trump's argument is utterly baseless.

    • @user-lh5sj8un4d
      @user-lh5sj8un4d Місяць тому

      That's terrible, this is what MAGA wants. They say democrats are communists already, that would just prove it.

    • @tylermaley7246
      @tylermaley7246 Місяць тому +5

      Biden is busy rounding up ice cream and pillows for his late night snack and nap time lol but ok…

    • @michellemugrauer8879
      @michellemugrauer8879 Місяць тому

      @@markkozlowski3674 lmao 🤣 WOKE

    • @maryford650
      @maryford650 Місяць тому +1

      If it goes Trump's way
      I'm with you.

  • @bek7562
    @bek7562 Місяць тому +22

    I cackled out loud at his silence after her asking “if a president orders the military to stage a coup?”

  • @o2lakowski
    @o2lakowski Місяць тому +9

    Why are these justices arguing hypotheticals like Trump's attorney is arguing hypotheticals rather than this particular case in front of them? Because what other protection offered to a president is taking the matter to SCOTUS for interpretation!

  • @Jenahh-aye
    @Jenahh-aye Місяць тому +64

    This dude gotta quit chain smoking.

    • @taY_Ler-MaDe
      @taY_Ler-MaDe Місяць тому +3

      🤣 Seriously like wow!

    • @techpappee
      @techpappee Місяць тому +2

      It sounds like some coke voices as well.

    • @martin2289
      @martin2289 Місяць тому +2

      The voice of evil.

    • @andywelsh3031
      @andywelsh3031 Місяць тому

      😂

    • @cassandratq9301
      @cassandratq9301 Місяць тому +1

      He clearly has a permanent physical condition which creates a raspy voice.

  • @randyerwin6016
    @randyerwin6016 Місяць тому +5

    But Justice, what if he had his fingers crossed behind his back when he took the oath...

  • @Infj4321
    @Infj4321 Місяць тому +6

    Perhaps more Justices are needed so the court won’t be skewed in favor of Trump / Republicans

  • @nurlindafsihotang49
    @nurlindafsihotang49 Місяць тому +4

    3 supreme judges of USA crazy enough to weight in, rather than throw a book, hell whole library to the Trump lawyer....are beyond me.
    Wth...!?

  • @BlueTsunami.2024
    @BlueTsunami.2024 Місяць тому +46

    Okay, if SCOTUS rules in favor of absolute Presidential immunity: All Hail King Dark Biden!

    • @SomethingBlonde-oc7sc
      @SomethingBlonde-oc7sc Місяць тому +12

      Ahahaha it is almost as if the people who think they want this have not thought it through. 🤭 Blue tsunami, indeed. 💙🌊

    • @michellemugrauer8879
      @michellemugrauer8879 Місяць тому +1

      @@SomethingBlonde-oc7sc LMAO 🤣 🤣🤣🤣🤣 #enjoyingthemovie🤣🤣

  • @MrJoco69
    @MrJoco69 Місяць тому +3

    Immunity should only be considered for very special situations.

  • @anarosado5215
    @anarosado5215 Місяць тому +14

    No one is above the law you do a CRIME YOU THE TIME GOD IS GOOD ALL THE TIME AMEN

    • @user-tc7df1en3p
      @user-tc7df1en3p 7 днів тому

      Prove it! If it was so, then we wouldn't have all this discussion.

  • @danah358
    @danah358 Місяць тому +4

    Was very impressed by the Govt’s lawyer Michael Dreeben..well done!

  • @DannyGray-kh5zv
    @DannyGray-kh5zv Місяць тому +5

    Its rediculous that they are even wasting time with this

    • @paigemprice
      @paigemprice Місяць тому +1

      They're giving Trump time, a delay, so he's not prosecuted during election

  • @davegarmendia1717
    @davegarmendia1717 Місяць тому +5

    NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!

  • @sarfrazkhan2318
    @sarfrazkhan2318 Місяць тому +5

    Devil might be at work . God Almighty save us !

  • @michaelhalterman8144
    @michaelhalterman8144 Місяць тому +7

    What a waste of time. I don't understand Trumps attorneys gameplan here. There's absolutely no chance SCOTUS rules in their favor.

    • @1thirdstone1
      @1thirdstone1 Місяць тому +2

      Don't be surprised.

    • @carlosnava8485
      @carlosnava8485 Місяць тому +6

      Game plan is delay

    • @michaelhalterman8144
      @michaelhalterman8144 Місяць тому

      @carlosnava8485 I agree with you but to what end? They're simply just not going to be able to delay the trial until the election, which I assume is the goal. Eventually, they will run out of excuses to delay and then he will be in the midst of a criminal trial during the height of his campaign.

  • @jantidwellaustin874
    @jantidwellaustin874 Місяць тому +13

    No Immunity Defendant Trump. 🎉

  • @frankjones4357
    @frankjones4357 Місяць тому +15

    The Emperor has no clothes. hahaha

  • @k.a.stensson
    @k.a.stensson Місяць тому +6

    Why did you bother splitting from England if you are going back to the age of Kings now?

  • @dr9gonkid20
    @dr9gonkid20 Місяць тому +8

    Not much to report
    No immunity

  • @SandraWeiss-jc6xz
    @SandraWeiss-jc6xz Місяць тому +5

    They'd better get this one right!!!

  • @shirleylori7892
    @shirleylori7892 Місяць тому +6

    😅😮lock him up don't let him run for president.

  • @eomaudits1148
    @eomaudits1148 Місяць тому +40

    Very absurd the supreme court is hearing this. Justice thomas needs impeached

    • @adrianh4989
      @adrianh4989 Місяць тому +5

      Amen.

    • @estherlamigueiro6217
      @estherlamigueiro6217 Місяць тому

      Why? Because you want he thinks what you want about it?

    • @deborahbeltz718
      @deborahbeltz718 Місяць тому +1

      Don't pick on judges. They voted them in to uphold the constitution and the law of the framers!

    • @GrumpyJerk
      @GrumpyJerk Місяць тому +3

      @@estherlamigueiro6217, what? Is that English?

    • @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj
      @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Місяць тому +2

      This is the USA. People dont need to be impeached because of personal reasons, dislikes, or personalities, nor should you or anyone.

  • @jwingate2060
    @jwingate2060 Місяць тому +4

    This lawyer sounds like he has spent a lifetime of defending people just like himself. He is wasting his time and everyone else. If you are a law student pay attention, he is talking so fast that everything he his saying is entrapping his argument. He is horrible.

  • @georgecarberry9222
    @georgecarberry9222 Місяць тому +5

    OMG!!! This is outrageous!!! The supreme court shouldn't even be listening to this moronic nonsense!!!

  • @rosettaarmstrong9433
    @rosettaarmstrong9433 19 днів тому +5

    No one is above the law means just that, NO ONE.

  • @eomaudits1148
    @eomaudits1148 Місяць тому +16

    God this lawyers voice is hidious like he spunds like a snake

  • @ezmarke6204
    @ezmarke6204 Місяць тому +3

    l cannot even say how horrendously offensive it is that this subject is actually being discussed as though it would ever be considered ! These are the things we pay these supreme court judges to do on our behalf 's ? It is crystal clear after listening to this insane discussion that these supreme court judges are absolutely devoid of justice, which i feel is most likely it why our country has been drained of any there might of been. Society better wake up and stand against all the crap going on all around us, instead of getting distracted by what is going on in other countries and other crap they are distracting people with! It is time to gather are wits and number of monstrous proportion of citizens who are ready to strip all of their immunity , they have been getting away with all their corruption we have been fed by them quite generously !

  • @irenemanzanarez6260
    @irenemanzanarez6260 Місяць тому +4

    They are JUST BUYING TIME.....
    DELAY...DELAY...DELAY..

  • @Ech0s_1972
    @Ech0s_1972 Місяць тому +5

    Insanity. This would grant kingship.

  • @oldmanfromoc7684
    @oldmanfromoc7684 Місяць тому +5

    Lock him up now

  • @fidenful
    @fidenful Місяць тому +75

    No one is above the law. Period.
    It is shameful that the SC should be even discussig the point

    • @drekoelprodigio
      @drekoelprodigio Місяць тому +6

      Where else would they discuss it? The View? TMZ? Your local CVS pharmacy? That’s the one forum that can discuss that topic. When the Biden’s get the same treatment I would love to see if people react the same. Democrat doesn’t equal good and Republican doesn’t equal evil. Research is very important in decision making.

    • @trinamanning1055
      @trinamanning1055 Місяць тому

      Democrats are way above the law.

    • @alexandermendez2348
      @alexandermendez2348 Місяць тому

      President is above the law. He has immunity

    • @louhovatter
      @louhovatter Місяць тому +3

      Not even Biden!

    • @louhovatter
      @louhovatter Місяць тому

      The current President hopes they get immunity! When he leaves office he’ll be charged with several crime! Money laundering to state with!

  • @DarwinSecrist-wy3pi
    @DarwinSecrist-wy3pi Місяць тому +5

    Bidden was 80 million strong votes ha ha

  • @yahairamedium4389
    @yahairamedium4389 Місяць тому +6

    please Civics ioi in school covered this shame on the courts and lawyers, we all Trump is using his position for self-gain, give this; lawyer a cough drop!

    • @paigemprice
      @paigemprice Місяць тому

      Do they still teach civics

  • @maryford650
    @maryford650 Місяць тому +3

    Would we get off of a crime because we say "I was so stressed out making this decision while doing my job I made a mistake."? Give me a break.

  • @user-il1ky3jx7x
    @user-il1ky3jx7x Місяць тому +4

    Let us pray for our country and Government.Please 😔🙏🙏

  • @AzzStar
    @AzzStar Місяць тому +4

    Listening to this argument I am sorry for my country USA.

  • @HeroOfTime622
    @HeroOfTime622 Місяць тому +12

    Here we go

    • @Annejo2018
      @Annejo2018 Місяць тому

      We’re already there

  • @S.Womack346
    @S.Womack346 Місяць тому +4

    This is ridiculous

  • @jaymieholmes638
    @jaymieholmes638 Місяць тому +29

    The Supreme Court better do the LEGAL thing, instead of the Trump thing. There will be fighting in the streets.

    • @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj
      @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Місяць тому +1

      Are you making threats?

    • @Shineon83
      @Shineon83 Місяць тому

      Do you even understand the boundaries of Presidential immunity? As the law NOW stands : A President can NOT be prosecuted for OFFICIAL acts. He/she CAN, however, be prosecuted for PERSONAL acts….So, what’s your issue?

    • @carlosf.5282
      @carlosf.5282 Місяць тому

      There will be FAAFO-ing in the streets. Think it's a game.

    • @shawnyoung8752
      @shawnyoung8752 15 днів тому

      ​@@Shineon83That means that instead of going through the proper channels of declassifiing documents. Trump just took them before he left office. Then he was asked 1 time then 2nd time. They know he is holding back many. Then he is found saying he took documents and they should not be shown. When classified material is to be shown its is for only certain people that are to be allowed to it . Say 32. They dint make 40 45 copies. They make the exact count. They are numbered and kept track of. In 80s they had 3 4 military veterans who had been in service for decades. They just made copies at hime or other places cause they were trusted. Then the clasified things were printed on paper that wouldnt be able to be photocopied, faxed,photograph. If it was tried it would be detected. Trump was as bad a OJ. He just changed his story 4 times in 6 months. Not a week. He denied it. Then he blamed it on lady lawyer that was hired 1 day before the 2nd turnover if documents. He could blane her. Yet he then said i didnt consider the proper way that was to declassified things i didnt think it was right. Then he said i can just think about it and it was declassified. Then he asked for them back. So the FBI Planted them. Then you say i took them cause it wasnt a thing i thoight mattered. Then he jyst declassified them thinking about it? Then he wanted them back? From planted documents to yes i took them to i want them back? If anyone's fingerprints orher tha his are on most documents? He showed or was not securing them. If anyone was caught with the Coke a cola recipe. KFC. Mc Donald's.? You would go to jail for 25 years . Yet You think this cliwn is ok with these acts?

  • @sandymac6503
    @sandymac6503 Місяць тому +10

    To make a distinction between a private and an official act suggests that the incumbent of the American presidency has the ability to periodically go on or off duty.. Rather, from the moment a president assumes office to the expiry of that appointment, the incumbent is never off duty. The official is not an hourly rated employee!

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 Місяць тому

      Wrong. The president does a lot of things that are not official. Running for re-election is one of them. If he does something criminally unlawful in pursuit of re-election, he is liable to criminal charges.

    • @proferwinstephan6641
      @proferwinstephan6641 День тому

      ich schlage vor alle USA Richter sollen sich Zusammen und einen Protest gegen die Suprem Richter machen . Thomason u Alio müssen sofort abgesetzt werden Die Reps mit ihrem Speeker bekommen so und so die nächste Quittung sie werden aus dem Kongress und Senat herausfliegen Das USA Volk wird diese Verzögerung rächen .

  • @jmont1031
    @jmont1031 Місяць тому +4

    Trumps attorney fighting off objections: nahh ahh. I disagree.

  • @jorgebravo4544
    @jorgebravo4544 Місяць тому +6

    President should have immunity. Biden could get rid of the fascist judges😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @sandradavis9422
      @sandradavis9422 Місяць тому +1

      Well he could get rid of the fascist at every level. Mtg 👋😂

  • @eldaza03
    @eldaza03 Місяць тому +4

    This hearing sounds like a game “follow my lead defense attorney “ the court lead this guy to his answers and when he got a wrong one they say “that is not what we are talking about here. SMH

  • @sherrylander2643
    @sherrylander2643 Місяць тому +4

    This is going to take the Supreme Court some time to make a decision because it will become law for so many years into the future.

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 Місяць тому +2

      Actually, those justices who kept saying that they were concerned for the future were departing from a longstanding principle that guides the work of the Supreme Court. That is, that it keeps its review to the most narrow margins, to deliberate only over the specifics of the case before them, rather than venture into the realm of legislating from the bench. They seem to have totally forgotten that, or at least a few of them have, in their current deliberations. It's pretty alarming, frankly. Too much of today's discussion had nothing to do with the Jan. 6 case!

    • @sherrylander2643
      @sherrylander2643 Місяць тому

      @@dmann1115 Agreed. The defense representatives kept swaying the arguments as each Judge tried to focus on the issues in the case.

    • @ivyrose779
      @ivyrose779 Місяць тому +3

      It shouldn’t be a question at all. Complete immunity for the President is the literal opposite of what the United States was founded on and has stood for in all of its existence.

    • @shawnyoung8752
      @shawnyoung8752 15 днів тому

      So Trump made a official act that he called the Georgia officials and asked for them to find him votes. Then he also made a official act with taking documents from the whitehouse that he first claimed were planted. Then he did not think the proper way to declassify them were necessary. Then he could just think of it and they were declassified. Finally he asked for them back. So his official act was that he never took anything from the and the FBI planted them. So he wants president al immunity for something that the FBI planted on him? His perfect call to Georgia officials was also official and he should be not be charged with any crime of trying to ask them for votes to help him win? That means that every time he has acussed other of crimes didnt they have immunity?

  • @JJenkins06095
    @JJenkins06095 Місяць тому +2

    “The unsouling of America” ~Judge Luttig

  • @theroguespointpirate7447
    @theroguespointpirate7447 Місяць тому +18

    Dark Biden going to get him LoL

  • @katherineroth2310
    @katherineroth2310 Місяць тому +3

    I hope Republicans
    Are listening. Especially to. Justice Sotomayor .

  • @chocolab3014
    @chocolab3014 Місяць тому +3

    I can't listen to that guy any longer! Disgusting!

  • @MrJoco69
    @MrJoco69 Місяць тому +1

    The Court should simplify the question of what could be Immunity!

  • @HOHLfmly
    @HOHLfmly Місяць тому +2

    The question can a Pesident be charged with doing an illegal act?
    Questioning whether it was official or private should bear no weight because the results are the same.
    Official Act- done with the advice of the president's advisors.
    Private Acts-”cannot be immune because the fact president is provided with the best legal counsel to help with official acts, meaning, he is told by his lawyers “You cannot do that it is illegal”. HERE IT COMES: If the president does not take the advice of the presidential advisors and goes ahead with an illegal act,
    He has done- “An Illegal Act”!

  • @charlesschmuckatelli7888
    @charlesschmuckatelli7888 Місяць тому +3

    Official power with corrupt intent is jail bait. Ask any commissioned officer...

  • @jimboateng681
    @jimboateng681 Місяць тому +9

    This guy sounds like a fool telling Americans the President can commit any crimes any gets away with it He doesn’t sound like a great lawyer his answers are vague

    • @kirinayamamoto2071
      @kirinayamamoto2071 Місяць тому +1

      Only President Klown, I don't think any past president have a circus like him or need immunity for any official matters

  • @AlexandraDelRio1
    @AlexandraDelRio1 Місяць тому +2

    I’m not American and even my blood runs cold listening to this. This is maniacal

  • @originalbaxtervoelker9213
    @originalbaxtervoelker9213 Місяць тому +2

    Sauer is wasting our time

  • @cristinesaunders2428
    @cristinesaunders2428 Місяць тому +15

    This dude is guilty and that is why he's a Trump "Fast Talker" about nothing!

    • @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj
      @ShelbyRadar-hb7tj Місяць тому +1

      So, unfortunately, but a good thing that's not you are not the judge and jury.

  • @carolmckellar8819
    @carolmckellar8819 Місяць тому +9

    He is guilty

  • @sylvainlabbe4899
    @sylvainlabbe4899 16 днів тому +2

    Let’s have a dictatorship, with full immunity, right ?😮😅

  • @calvinbrown1995
    @calvinbrown1995 Місяць тому +13

    When people break state and federal laws, they do not have immunity from the crimes. No matter who you are even Supreme Court judges.

    • @wesdunn9995
      @wesdunn9995 Місяць тому

      Looks like biden and his family have no worries about breaking the law

    • @carolmckellar8819
      @carolmckellar8819 Місяць тому +1

      Presidents can do thing. The courts have no power against them I have no pride in our country anymore the judge ruined our laws and my life Americans are help less any more we no laws no pride in our country I am extremely disappointed in our judges

  • @edc8388
    @edc8388 Місяць тому +1

    It beggars belief that any nation calling itself civilised would even think to ask these questions with the expectation that they might actually get the answer they are demanding !. It's a new kind of insanity.

  • @woke1340
    @woke1340 Місяць тому +3

    Trump lawyer doing his best to argue what is indefensible 😂

  • @burnellmusic
    @burnellmusic Місяць тому +5

    Is it just me, or does the Trump attorney sound like a Dalek?

  • @clarissacooper5821
    @clarissacooper5821 Місяць тому +1

    His lawyer sounds like a robot! 🤷🏽‍♀️

  • @cassandratq9301
    @cassandratq9301 Місяць тому +2

    These comments about voices are tedious. Whatever you think about the merit of their actual arguments, both lawyers are obviously very quick on their feet + well-prepared. Commenting on something out of their control is unnecessary.

  • @johntillotson4254
    @johntillotson4254 Місяць тому +3

    This man is a danger to this country. This should not even be an issue. This is ridiculous

  • @AndreaCuchetto
    @AndreaCuchetto Місяць тому +7

    Listen for Kavanaugh to posit something to the effect of: the _majority_ of people think President Ford pardoning Nixon is one of the “better decisions”....
    WTAF?!?

    • @paigemprice
      @paigemprice Місяць тому +2

      If Nixon has immunity why did he need a pardon? Is what I would have asked

    • @RidingWithBiden
      @RidingWithBiden 15 днів тому +2

      It was undoubtedly a very poor decision. I was shocked at the time. Romney got it wrong as well when he said that Biden should have pardoned Trump when he took office. Can you imagine the uproar had Biden done that? He never would have regained the respect of Democrats.

  • @PearlOfTheQuarter23
    @PearlOfTheQuarter23 Місяць тому +2

    The framers argument is stupid

  • @lashirllee4169
    @lashirllee4169 18 днів тому +2

    Dang this is so depressing, what kind of devil's worship is
    This ??? We all need to pray 😢

  • @ClydeWilliams-vl7ou
    @ClydeWilliams-vl7ou Місяць тому +2

    Justice

  • @nickinurse118
    @nickinurse118 Місяць тому +13

    Ms Jackson is the only sane voice in the room

  • @Cherokeeseeker
    @Cherokeeseeker 23 дні тому +1

    This will all be studied in depth through the ages. The true truth will eventually ring true

  • @daynettradakovich8381
    @daynettradakovich8381 Місяць тому +2

    This is bullsh*t no one is above the law.

  • @shiddykiddy-lp4dz
    @shiddykiddy-lp4dz Місяць тому +3

    Biden is the president and will probably be the next one too. It'll be really cool if Biden gets all that power. We have lots of ideas for him when it comes to Trump's people 🤣🤣🤭🤭