@@grantmccoy6739 Diesels are built from the ground up for high compression and fuel oil. these tiny fours are blown within an inch of their lives. look on the internet.....you won't have to look far to find blown head gaskets, thrown rods, and melted pistons. not to mention crudded up intake valves due to direct injection (thank the EPA) Ford has a class action lawsuit against their 3 and 4 cylinder ecoboost motors for bad block/head design and blown head gaskets. This just doesn't happen with normal V-8's and 6's.
I am glad GM finally updated the interior. It looks nice and the styling had to grow on me. My dad had a 1978 Chevy truck 🚚 . Always a soft spot for the bow tie.
I ran 13.7 in the 1/4 mile using a Dragy with a 2020 6.2 High Country, S&B intake, headers with hi-flow cats, 35s, 10 speed, 6+ inch lift, and a re-tune. Decently quick trucks!
Damn that's nice for the size my buddies gr corolla ran 13.3 with the little 1.6 3 cylinder turbo and my Veloster N DCT ran a 13.5 both stock but holy shit a 6 inch lift truck moving that fast must look crazy😅😅😅😂😂
People are buying pick ups now for luxury. There's no reason to buy a High Country, Sierra Denali, F-150 Limited, or Ram Limited for any other reason than luxury and features. The demand for luxury pick ups have skyrocketed over the last decade or so. They still want the feel of a truck but with all the amenities of a luxury car. Have you seen the commercial for the Silverado? He didn't want to let his wife and friends in because they were all muddy. That's what it has come to
Don't care for the looks but I would still buy one if I could get in a 2 door short bed with the 6.2. But Chevrolet is not Burger King, you can't get it your way.
Because Toyota Tundra was bigger when they came out with the 5.7 engine and suddenly everyone else started getting better engines and trucks got bigger
Having used many of the Silverado's for work over the years. The Silverado's from the 1990's - 2006 had a much better driver profile over the front of the hood. The half ton trucks and also the 3/4 and 1 ton trucks have such a tall grill. It's hard to get a feel of how close your parking to fences , curbs or a wall. Makes for a shitty work truck !
That spot for the supercruise monitor in the wheel it's exactly where my driving instructor taught me to place my hands when I was doing my drivers training in 1980! 😂
@@toronado455your hands aren’t on the wheel while using super cruise so it won’t matter. Furthermore, they teach people to hold their hands at 9 and 3 or 8 and 4 now. 10 and 2 is old school out of date and dangerous.
I wounder how many people will go to the shop saying hands free drive ( and I am sure a few other options ) are not working? The senor is in the Steering Wheel. A steering wheel cover is going to get people upset for sure. Unless they make one with the area on the wheel still open/not covered.
Chevy poses a lot of threats to ford and dodge, those days are not over. GM outsells ford AND dodge in truck and car sales, and GM is the biggest automotive company in America, and the 2023 Chevy and GMC trucks are way better than any ford or dodge, sooooooooooo
@@scobo4743 I have owned pickups since I was a kid and still own one. All were non aspirated engines WTF are you talking about? My brother owned turbo cars and they were much faster than V8s.
It's interesting you can get super cruise now but the price of trucks is stating to make electric vehicle prices look mid level and "normal". I wonder what the average vehicle price would be if you removed truck sales.
Glad John cam stay positive reviewing this, he's seen some great truck designs in his time and is now subjugated to... this. Always glad he can keep a positive attitude even in this grotesque automotive landscape
Amazed at the power of the 4 cylinder engine. I would be satisfied with any trim level Chevrolet Silverado but I think I prefer the GMC Sierra and while I prefer the rumble of a V8 the 300+ hp and 400+ lb ft of torque of the 2.7 liter 4 cylinder would make it adequate.
Can some Murrican explain why, excluding towing and off-road use, a pickup truck is superior to a van? They have less enclosed cargo space and cargo space in general, are much bigger than vans with a similar amount of cargo space, and consume more fuel.
It all depends on your needs. Open truck beds are good for hauling outdoor equipment or ATVs; basically anything dirty, full of gasoline (you don't want fuel vapors in the cab with you), or taller than the cab, and since the tailgate seems to be extinct on full size SUVs here in favor of lift gates, they are better for hauling long building supplies in large quantities as the tailgate extends the load floor of the bed. You also can install a tonneau cover or fiberglass bed topper to enclose the cargo area and change its proportions. Vans and full sized 3-row SUVs are better people movers with seven or eight seats and can fit 4x8 building materials inside with the seats down typically, but a lot of pickups here are sold as five or six passenger crew cabs (the latter if you have a front bench seat). We have a full sized 1/2 ton truck primarily to tow our camper trailer, but it's a six-seater crew cab so it's also useful as a daily driver/family hauler. It's bigger and less economical compared to a minivan, for example, but it does what we need it to and it's not our only vehicle; we also have a small SUV that gets better mileage and fits in tighter parking spots.
@@voided3 I'm not talking about a minivan, I mean something like a Ford Transit or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter. Those can definitely fit something like an ATV, dirt bike or sheets of plywood. The cargo space is separate from the cab. The only downside is that vans typically don't fit more than a driver and 2 passengers.
@@mbox314 1. That depends on one's own personal prejudices. 2. Fair enough, but it's not like the cargo space can't be cleaned? Something like hay can just be brushed off.
@@Tuppoo94 Gas is alot cheaper in the US and it is one of the cheapest parts of owning a vehicle, gasoline is $3000/year while insurance and depreciation is 4-6000/year. Trucks fit people's needs better than vans do. Typically people use vans when they have a business that involves carrying around lots of small expemsive stuff like a plumber, well pump or HVAC tradesmen. Also towing trailers and going off road is much more common, It was last week I was using my truck to pull tree stumps out of the ground, the big tow hooks and 4wd were both in use. I frequently tow a trailer as I have a side business plasma cutting metal. I used to use my toyota avalon to tow a trailer but unfortunately the car aged out and nearly all modern sedans are not rated to tow trailers.
@@joeblow5037 these companies are so greedy. It’s doesn’t take 40K to build a short cab 2WD base engine base interior truck esp if the base engine in that RAM is the 3.6 that they have been building for the past 10+ years.
GMC and Chevy sell more than ford. Ford is just cleaver by saying the “F” series is the best selling which includes the f150 and all the f trucks. So the F150 doesn’t always outsell the Silverado.
LOL. But if you read a little more closely I said “doesn’t always “ which means you can find years where Silverado beat F150. But main point being GM sells more trucks than all F series combined. Probably not always but currently they do. 🎉
"Just $40,000". Child, most people out here are lucky if they can afford a $20,000 vehicle, and even the work truck model for this starts at over 40 grand?? And then when new car sales are in the toilet, they have to nerve to wonder why. These cars have been getting ridiculously expensive, meanwhile people have been lucky to make enough money to barely make ends meet. Guess I'll be sticking with used cars for a while 🤷🏽♀️
I have a 1985 Chevy C30 dump from when trucks where actually trucks. It'll run forever. Let's go hook chains and see if the new truck can pull the old one around..... 😂
Just love MotorWeek. Great video but still very disappointed with these new GM trucks even after this update. Roof structure above the front doors and front door frames are still way too short and odd looking, especially from a side profile. Useless wax on the frames, ugly body plugs along the underside of the rocker panels, stupid mirror placement on the front doors. Because of this, there's still an ugly black piece of triangular plastic in the corner of the window where the mirrors SHOULD be mounted. Overall styling is still ugly, better than before, but still ugly. Same goes for the new GM full size SUV's. In addition, their IRS lower control arms hang down WAY too low and is very unsightly when looking at them from behind. Why can't GM tuck them up nicely like other manufacturers? Dumb. Very beautiful interiors though, I will say that. It's the exteriors that's the problem. Looks like the upcoming HD Silverado is still very awkward and horrible looking. A slight improvement but not by much. Several people at work have bought one of these new gens because they're brand loyal. They've all admitted to not liking the looks of them and much prefer the previous gen. They've also not noticed the things I've mentioned until I brought it to their attention. Again, buying them due to brand loyalty and definitely not because they're a good looking vehicle...which I think is also being stubbornly dumb.
Complete junk. Already sold my High Country back to the dealership. Tried for many years to stay with Chevy but just can't do it anymore. Will be buying a loaded Ram for the first time ever. With the cheaper materials, the junk transmissions that the dealership just blows you off when you raise concern about the hard shifts, the numerous recalls, leaky sills, and the price they expect you to pay, I can't justify dealing with them anymore.
What a shame. GM used to produce the best half tons in terms of quality, but that was over 20 years ago. Now they just make overpriced junk. Countless stories of engine and transmission failures on the newer 1500’s.
Nice that GM offers both a gasoline turbo-4, and a light duty diesel in this truck. Shame about those nasty digital instruments and touchscreens, though. This is a Detroit truck, not a Tesla.
That depends On the Trimline. If you want just the "base" models it will be lower than 50K. If you want the Top-Of-The-Line everything it will be over 70k
Oh man. I think we’re in the new malaise era. Gigantic vehicles with unnecessary luxury options that take away from the actual driving, and sometimes even distract from it. 🤦🏻♂️ Overcomplicate the simple things; just because. That shifter…. Makes…. Makes me… think the rams dial shifter is a, dare I say it, better idea. 🤢
Nice looking, but GM’s poor build quality and garbage customer service sent me looking elsewhere a long time ago. Of your brand was bailed out, chances are it found itself in a bad place for good reason.
Folks, don't be fooled, this is NOT A ROAD TEST. IT IS A COMMERCIAL MASQUERADING AS EDITORIAL. Motorweek are supplied by local dealerships under the proviso that they give good reviews. They are "flown" by manufacturers' marketing departments to racetracks and other exotic locations to test new vehicles... and you bet they are expected to provide positive coverage, otherwise that access dries up. It is "access journalism." What kind of automotive journalist calls an article a "road test" which includes NOTHING about gasoline consumption? They didn't even need to do a test themselves, they could have just looked it up on Chevy's website. But no... it's not present in the video at all. Finding out what the quarter-mile top speed is somehow important enough to make it into the video however. FYI Chevy's website says "estimated 17MPG Combined" - and that is "no payload, towing nothing." 24-gallon tank... $80+ to fill it up. Motorweek had nothing to say at all about this aspect of the truck, or the climate-warming pollution that occurs as a result.
@@lotsofcurveslover they could measure the pollution coming out of the tailpipe! They could discuss how much it costs to fill it up with gasoline. They could discuss the range of the truck with no payload, half-payload and full payload. They could discuss the oil-change interval and how much that costs at a local Chevy dealership (perhaps, even the one that supplied the truck!). They could discuss the cost of replacing the tires - from Tire Rack!!!
This vid is deceiving in its claim that Ford F-150 outsells the Silverado , when you combine the GMC Sierra with the Silverado ( same truck basically), the sales numbers are very close , the Ford on top by a small margin
Eh. I don’t know. I don’t really think it’s deceptive to say that one model outsells the other. Realty is that, even though they ride on sister platforms of tech and engineering, the Silverado and Sierra are different models.
@@nashgover2095 Bro, as2020 Silverado HD owner, I've driven the GMC before purchase, they are for all intent and purposes the same truck with a few aesthetic changes, I put them in the same carpool ( My opinion)
That is a shockingly nice interior. I'm also surprised to hear the 4 cyl creates over 400 lb-ft of torque. That's just crazy.
don't expect to get 300k miles out of a blown 4
@@joeblow5037 I don't understand why? Diesels usually last really long. What's the difference?
@@grantmccoy6739 Diesels are built from the ground up for high compression and fuel oil.
these tiny fours are blown within an inch of their lives.
look on the internet.....you won't have to look far to find blown head gaskets, thrown rods, and melted pistons.
not to mention crudded up intake valves due to direct injection (thank the EPA)
Ford has a class action lawsuit against their 3 and 4 cylinder ecoboost motors for bad block/head design and blown head gaskets.
This just doesn't happen with normal V-8's and 6's.
@@joeblow5037 so it's not because they are turbo 4's, it's because they aren't built correctly. Big "if" there.
@@grantmccoy6739 sure
I'll play
name me a turbo 4 that is built 'correctly'
I am glad GM finally updated the interior. It looks nice and the styling had to grow on me. My dad had a 1978 Chevy truck 🚚 . Always a soft spot for the bow tie.
Huge improvement
Mister Davis is back !!! Made the video worth watching
Looks good. The best looking of the newer over-styled trucks.
Much better styling inside and out. Looks premium. A welcome update.
Ima just say that truck is faster then 6.5 seconds to 60 it’s at least 6 flats while the Rst model can do 5.4
This is one great looking Chevy truck! And that’s a lot coming from me! Since I never really cared for their pick up trucks line ups before!
Very nice this styling of Chevy Silverado. Best truck of the every times
I ran 13.7 in the 1/4 mile using a Dragy with a 2020 6.2 High Country, S&B intake, headers with hi-flow cats, 35s, 10 speed, 6+ inch lift, and a re-tune. Decently quick trucks!
Damn that's nice for the size my buddies gr corolla ran 13.3 with the little 1.6 3 cylinder turbo and my Veloster N DCT ran a 13.5 both stock but holy shit a 6 inch lift truck moving that fast must look crazy😅😅😅😂😂
I use my trucks for work. where is the storage space for the 2 way radios ? shifter should be on the steering columb where it is out of the way.
I think it’s still available on the lower trims, the luxury trims don’t take actual work needs into account sadly.
People are buying pick ups now for luxury. There's no reason to buy a High Country, Sierra Denali, F-150 Limited, or Ram Limited for any other reason than luxury and features. The demand for luxury pick ups have skyrocketed over the last decade or so. They still want the feel of a truck but with all the amenities of a luxury car. Have you seen the commercial for the Silverado? He didn't want to let his wife and friends in because they were all muddy. That's what it has come to
The W/T is a Work Truck
also WALKY TALKY
Nobody actually uses a truck for work anymore. It's bizarre
I like the bumper mounted USB ports.
Are the fluid dipsticks accessible through some hidden port by the bumper, or do you have to buy the optional ladder?
Depends how 🤔 tall you are. 😏
I don't think they have a dipstick for the transmission any more.
oil stick drone 🦟
These engines grenade before the first oil change. 😂
Thankfully ladders are on sale right now
That 2.7L is going to be fun in the Colorado
Don't care for the looks but I would still buy one if I could get in a 2 door short bed with the 6.2. But Chevrolet is not Burger King, you can't get it your way.
That front of the car is real and not a joke? It's great for not seeing the people you would hit with it's massive height
Does anyone know why 1/2 ton trucks have gotten so big? Just curious.
Double cab?
Market demand and government safety standards mostly.
Because Toyota Tundra was bigger when they came out with the 5.7 engine and suddenly everyone else started getting better engines and trucks got bigger
@@reyperez3424 no. Gm has being using a small block v8 forever basically.
Having used many of the Silverado's for work over the years. The Silverado's from the 1990's - 2006 had a much better driver profile over the front of the hood. The half ton trucks and also the 3/4 and 1 ton trucks have such a tall grill. It's hard to get a feel of how close your parking to fences , curbs or a wall. Makes for a shitty work truck !
Great job on the inside
Great and nice Silverado
Till the IR emitters for occupant monitoring are covered with a Pep-Boys Loonie Tunes steering wheel cover.
That spot for the supercruise monitor in the wheel it's exactly where my driving instructor taught me to place my hands when I was doing my drivers training in 1980! 😂
@@toronado455your hands aren’t on the wheel while using super cruise so it won’t matter. Furthermore, they teach people to hold their hands at 9 and 3 or 8 and 4 now. 10 and 2 is old school out of date and dangerous.
I wounder how many people will go to the shop saying hands free drive ( and I am sure a few other options ) are not working?
The senor is in the Steering Wheel. A steering wheel cover is going to get people upset for sure. Unless they make one with the area on the wheel still open/not covered.
I have never seen someone put a steering wheel cover in a new car, only older cars with a gross old sticky steering wheel.
Why not show the mpg for all of the versions? Small diesel?
Chevy poses a lot of threats to ford and dodge, those days are not over. GM outsells ford AND dodge in truck and car sales, and GM is the biggest automotive company in America, and the 2023 Chevy and GMC trucks are way better than any ford or dodge, sooooooooooo
Wow, a four cylinder turbo is out pulling the 5.3 v8.
They always did!
It's surprising to me as well.
For 5 years then it will die and the v8 will last longer than the life of the truck
@@scobo4743 you think the head gasket will fail or something? I can't imagine that it wouldn't be as capable as the diesel...
@@scobo4743 I have owned pickups since I was a kid and still own one. All were non aspirated engines WTF are you talking about? My brother owned turbo cars and they were much faster than V8s.
That leather interior color is cool.
It's interesting you can get super cruise now but the price of trucks is stating to make electric vehicle prices look mid level and "normal". I wonder what the average vehicle price would be if you removed truck sales.
I suspect they would skyrocket for car sales given they make a lot more profit on trucks than cars.
Quite a bit slower 0-60 than the Sierra Denali last year you tested
The front fascia looks nicer than the 2021 model. Chevy needed to update the interior to keep up with Ram.
Glad John cam stay positive reviewing this, he's seen some great truck designs in his time and is now subjugated to... this. Always glad he can keep a positive attitude even in this grotesque automotive landscape
BLUE leather!?!?! Yes please 🙏🏼
Did they fix the lifter problems?
Amazed at the power of the 4 cylinder engine. I would be satisfied with any trim level Chevrolet Silverado but I think I prefer the GMC Sierra and while I prefer the rumble of a V8 the 300+ hp and 400+ lb ft of torque of the 2.7 liter 4 cylinder would make it adequate.
Each gas engine needs at least 50hp bump.
Can some Murrican explain why, excluding towing and off-road use, a pickup truck is superior to a van? They have less enclosed cargo space and cargo space in general, are much bigger than vans with a similar amount of cargo space, and consume more fuel.
It all depends on your needs. Open truck beds are good for hauling outdoor equipment or ATVs; basically anything dirty, full of gasoline (you don't want fuel vapors in the cab with you), or taller than the cab, and since the tailgate seems to be extinct on full size SUVs here in favor of lift gates, they are better for hauling long building supplies in large quantities as the tailgate extends the load floor of the bed. You also can install a tonneau cover or fiberglass bed topper to enclose the cargo area and change its proportions. Vans and full sized 3-row SUVs are better people movers with seven or eight seats and can fit 4x8 building materials inside with the seats down typically, but a lot of pickups here are sold as five or six passenger crew cabs (the latter if you have a front bench seat). We have a full sized 1/2 ton truck primarily to tow our camper trailer, but it's a six-seater crew cab so it's also useful as a daily driver/family hauler. It's bigger and less economical compared to a minivan, for example, but it does what we need it to and it's not our only vehicle; we also have a small SUV that gets better mileage and fits in tighter parking spots.
1. Vans have a child molester look to them
2. Dirt, manure, hay and other loose loads are best carried outside the vehicle rather than inside.
@@voided3 I'm not talking about a minivan, I mean something like a Ford Transit or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter. Those can definitely fit something like an ATV, dirt bike or sheets of plywood. The cargo space is separate from the cab. The only downside is that vans typically don't fit more than a driver and 2 passengers.
@@mbox314 1. That depends on one's own personal prejudices.
2. Fair enough, but it's not like the cargo space can't be cleaned? Something like hay can just be brushed off.
@@Tuppoo94
Gas is alot cheaper in the US and it is one of the cheapest parts of owning a vehicle, gasoline is $3000/year while insurance and depreciation is 4-6000/year. Trucks fit people's needs better than vans do. Typically people use vans when they have a business that involves carrying around lots of small expemsive stuff like a plumber, well pump or HVAC tradesmen.
Also towing trailers and going off road is much more common, It was last week I was using my truck to pull tree stumps out of the ground, the big tow hooks and 4wd were both in use. I frequently tow a trailer as I have a side business plasma cutting metal. I used to use my toyota avalon to tow a trailer but unfortunately the car aged out and nearly all modern sedans are not rated to tow trailers.
Work truck is 41K sheesh.
even TFL payed 40k for a stripped V-6 2 door 4wd RAM.
and they even scoured the Internet to get a deal THAT good.
$36,395 MSRP per the Chevy website.
@@tedschmitt178 nice. So MW is liars.
@@joeblow5037 these companies are so greedy. It’s doesn’t take 40K to build a short cab 2WD base engine base interior truck esp if the base engine in that RAM is the 3.6 that they have been building for the past 10+ years.
6.5 seconds to 60 is impressive for being a snail off the line
Who gives a F**k how fast a pickup can do the quarter mile in? Just a way to sell a pickup for the same price as a Mercedes.
GMC and Chevy sell more than ford. Ford is just cleaver by saying the “F” series is the best selling which includes the f150 and all the f trucks. So the F150 doesn’t always outsell the Silverado.
They do combined but the F150 outsells the Silverado by over 100,000 units by itself. You torpedoed your own argument right off the hop
@@johnmiller4973 ... Or more accurately, he "cleavered" it?😉
LOL. But if you read a little more closely I said “doesn’t always “ which means you can find years where Silverado beat F150. But main point being GM sells more trucks than all F series combined. Probably not always but currently they do. 🎉
@@mmarx1682 I think Ram is currently #2 behind F-150 by individual model. Silverado styling was the reason.
@@777jones yes I agree ram probably looks the best currently
So what is the actual price after you factor in the dealer MSRP mark-ups?
What? You don't want to pay 75 grand for a Chevy?
@@CalvinHikes 75k easy. I like my 2017. I don't owe anything on it. Kinda hard to justify the spend when not much has changed.
Are dealers still doing markups? Mine gave me a discount on a 2022 ltz.
Bowtie Beautification
Great job
From paris france...
Keep it up
I love that music at the end.
Previous gen exterior was so nice, disappointing redesign
"Just $40,000". Child, most people out here are lucky if they can afford a $20,000 vehicle, and even the work truck model for this starts at over 40 grand?? And then when new car sales are in the toilet, they have to nerve to wonder why. These cars have been getting ridiculously expensive, meanwhile people have been lucky to make enough money to barely make ends meet. Guess I'll be sticking with used cars for a while 🤷🏽♀️
And yet these trucks are selling faster then they can make them.
Damn 2.7 doing 430 torque and the 6.2 460 torque
IS THAT MY DADDY?!
I have a 1985 Chevy C30 dump from when trucks where actually trucks. It'll run forever.
Let's go hook chains and see if the new truck can pull the old one around..... 😂
Pavement princessess
That 0-60 and 1/4 time is off..
stuff has got WAY to expensive
Top of mind.... 🤔
Am I the only one who finds the music in these reviews irritating?
Mama likes 🥰🥰 I wonder how much a month is that sucker.
The 2.7t is the more common and interesting engine. Too bad they tested that montroscopity of a v8 that I would have guessed to be a little quicker.
Just love MotorWeek. Great video but still very disappointed with these new GM trucks even after this update.
Roof structure above the front doors and front door frames are still way too short and odd looking, especially from a side profile. Useless wax on the frames, ugly body plugs along the underside of the rocker panels, stupid mirror placement on the front doors. Because of this, there's still an ugly black piece of triangular plastic in the corner of the window where the mirrors SHOULD be mounted. Overall styling is still ugly, better than before, but still ugly.
Same goes for the new GM full size SUV's. In addition, their IRS lower control arms hang down WAY too low and is very unsightly when looking at them from behind. Why can't GM tuck them up nicely like other manufacturers? Dumb.
Very beautiful interiors though, I will say that. It's the exteriors that's the problem.
Looks like the upcoming HD Silverado is still very awkward and horrible looking. A slight improvement but not by much. Several people at work have bought one of these new gens because they're brand loyal. They've all admitted to not liking the looks of them and much prefer the previous gen. They've also not noticed the things I've mentioned until I brought it to their attention. Again, buying them due to brand loyalty and definitely not because they're a good looking vehicle...which I think is also being stubbornly dumb.
Every pickup look the same I can’t tell the difference anymore
Time will tell if these new Silverados will be trouble free. Previous models, well...were not.
Pickup life cycle, no touchscreen look like break
Complete junk. Already sold my High Country back to the dealership. Tried for many years to stay with Chevy but just can't do it anymore. Will be buying a loaded Ram for the first time ever. With the cheaper materials, the junk transmissions that the dealership just blows you off when you raise concern about the hard shifts, the numerous recalls, leaky sills, and the price they expect you to pay, I can't justify dealing with them anymore.
Chevy is the best, and that is a fact, and ford and dodge are dead, SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
@@traciweisenbachCITB ignorant and uneducated. Numbers don't lie. Ignorance is obviously bliss with you.
Chevy trucks classic is best
I'd rather buy and svt lightning
Electronic shifter, piss off wheel fans
What a shame. GM used to produce the best half tons in terms of quality, but that was over 20 years ago. Now they just make overpriced junk. Countless stories of engine and transmission failures on the newer 1500’s.
GM and Chevy make the best vehicles, and you KNOW IT, sooooo
Nice that GM offers both a gasoline turbo-4, and a light duty diesel in this truck. Shame about those nasty digital instruments and touchscreens, though. This is a Detroit truck, not a Tesla.
Too much extra bullshit I don't need in a truck and way too expensive.
GMC trucks look the same for the past 20 years
A $70k truck; the status symbol of suburban America. Don't scratch that bed when loading that bag of Home Depot mulch!
That depends On the Trimline. If you want just the "base" models it will be lower than 50K.
If you want the Top-Of-The-Line everything it will be over 70k
Get sum young blood in the video not this old guy
Please, please, PLEASE no more “top of mind” affectations. Unless you are talking about dead people.
Oh man. I think we’re in the new malaise era. Gigantic vehicles with unnecessary luxury options that take away from the actual driving, and sometimes even distract from it. 🤦🏻♂️
Overcomplicate the simple things; just because. That shifter…. Makes…. Makes me… think the rams dial shifter is a, dare I say it, better idea. 🤢
More Chevy junk it has the shity afm and dfm stay away more broken lifters and bent push rods total junk motors
Nice looking, but GM’s poor build quality and garbage customer service sent me looking elsewhere a long time ago. Of your brand was bailed out, chances are it found itself in a bad place for good reason.
"Top of Mind"?
🤦♂
Folks, don't be fooled, this is NOT A ROAD TEST. IT IS A COMMERCIAL MASQUERADING AS EDITORIAL. Motorweek are supplied by local dealerships under the proviso that they give good reviews. They are "flown" by manufacturers' marketing departments to racetracks and other exotic locations to test new vehicles... and you bet they are expected to provide positive coverage, otherwise that access dries up. It is "access journalism." What kind of automotive journalist calls an article a "road test" which includes NOTHING about gasoline consumption? They didn't even need to do a test themselves, they could have just looked it up on Chevy's website. But no... it's not present in the video at all. Finding out what the quarter-mile top speed is somehow important enough to make it into the video however. FYI Chevy's website says "estimated 17MPG Combined" - and that is "no payload, towing nothing." 24-gallon tank... $80+ to fill it up. Motorweek had nothing to say at all about this aspect of the truck, or the climate-warming pollution that occurs as a result.
Climate warming pollution. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂 Quit drinking the moronic Kool aid.
How would you improve the review?
@@lotsofcurveslover they could measure the pollution coming out of the tailpipe! They could discuss how much it costs to fill it up with gasoline. They could discuss the range of the truck with no payload, half-payload and full payload. They could discuss the oil-change interval and how much that costs at a local Chevy dealership (perhaps, even the one that supplied the truck!). They could discuss the cost of replacing the tires - from Tire Rack!!!
@@MartinGalway all good points, thanks.
Lol. Gtfoh looney tunes
This vid is deceiving in its claim that Ford F-150 outsells the Silverado , when you combine the GMC Sierra with the Silverado ( same truck basically), the sales numbers are very close , the Ford on top by a small margin
Eh. I don’t know. I don’t really think it’s deceptive to say that one model outsells the other. Realty is that, even though they ride on sister platforms of tech and engineering, the Silverado and Sierra are different models.
@@nashgover2095 Bro, as2020 Silverado HD owner, I've driven the GMC before purchase, they are for all intent and purposes the same truck with a few aesthetic changes, I put them in the same carpool ( My opinion)