Wow. Wasn’t expecting the winning sequence to involve sacrificing one passed pawn….only to trap the rook by force! This was a very interesting endgame.
@0:57, according to SF 16.1, black's winning move was 1. ...Rb1+ 2. Kd2...c1=Q 3. RxQ...RxR 4. KxR...g3! 5. Rf1...Be2 6. Rg1...Kf4. Zhu points this out at 7:29. Looks like Ivanchuck is too stubborn to accept that it is the winning maneuver to me lol.
Zhu Jiner боролась до конца с Легендой, анализировала партию вместе с Легендой, расставила фигуры Иванчуку после партии, она была скромна и профессиональна, было очень приятно за ней наблюдать, великолепный момент!
Let's face it...Ivanchuk is a LEGEND in the chess world. His masterful game against Garry Kasparov at the Linares tournament in 1991 is considered one of the most memorable chess matches. Ivanchuk, playing white, defeated Kasparov using the Sicilian Defense, Canal-Sokolsky (Nimzovich-Rossolimo, Moscow) attack. This victory was significant since Kasparov was the reigning World Champion at the time! What I find sad is that chess legends like Ivanchuk...and others...begin to lose their "sharpness" as they get older...and they start losing to these young and upcoming superstars who are barely adults! Chess engines have contributed to the astronomical rise in chess strength (especially for youths) over the past twenty years.
Yes, I know he didn’t lose this particular game. But that doesn’t change the overall point of my comment. Chess legends like Ivanchuk…who are inevitably getting on in years…are now at the mercy of these young and upcoming chess superstars who may have learned the moves just a few short years ago…largely because of the use of engines to enhance and accelerate the learning process. Frankly, it’s hard for me to wrap my head around that…because the experience and wisdom of chess legends like Ivanchuk cannot be acquired overnight!
@@vcliburn you literally said "they start losing to these young and upcoming superstars" but anyway maintaining a draw at old age actually shows sharpness is not dull yet counter to your melodramatic narrative
@@AdamLuiTube It's really not a "melodramatic narrative" when you look at it from the standpoint that a player with Ivanchuk's vast experience should be expected to beat...and not just draw...these young players repeatedly, and with no difficulty at all. But that's simply not the case. This is in no way a criticism or a negative reflection on Ivanchuk, but rather a rude awakening of how chess learning has evolved so rapidly in recent years. For example, Fischer grew up in the 1940s & 50s, and he obviously had no access to chess engines. At that time he was a very rare exception. However, nowadays such "talents" are much more commonplace...not only in the U.S. but worldwide. I can attribute this tremendous rise in chess "talent" among youths to the use of powerful chess engines in learning, studying, and practicing chess. Nothing more, and nothing less.
0:56 Horrible blunder from Chucky Of course he had to play 1....Rb1+ 2.Kd2 c1=Q+ 3.Rxc1 Rxc1 4.Kxc1 g3 5.Rf1 Be2 And white is totally lost because one of black pawns will promote Once you know Idea 1... Rb1+ , it is easy even to win it vs tricky and evil Stockfish. But of course you have to stop for a 20 -30 sec and calculate a little bit and find it . Ivanchuk rushed , played Kh5 too quickly and winning moment was gone.
Yes, I saw what Zhu Jiner shown him but imao it was not so easy to calculate on that time. Ivanchuk played good enough. It reminds me somehow the candidates 2024 game Gukesh - Abasov where I think the last one was pretty sure it's a draw, but the king of Gukish was better so this type of position is quite hard to calculate even in classics.
4:50, he should've promote the pawn to a rook or queen with check! What he did was illegal and should stop the clock to summon the arbiter for his illegal move.
@@trumpforever6706 actually it's chess, not checkers, it's hard already, no need to put more pressure cause you are playing a legend. What he did is illegal and I would have called the arbiter, he can forfeit if he does it twice. Just bad stuff from chuky.
Wow. Wasn’t expecting the winning sequence to involve sacrificing one passed pawn….only to trap the rook by force! This was a very interesting endgame.
@0:57, according to SF 16.1, black's winning move was 1. ...Rb1+ 2. Kd2...c1=Q 3. RxQ...RxR 4. KxR...g3! 5. Rf1...Be2 6. Rg1...Kf4. Zhu points this out at 7:29. Looks like Ivanchuck is too stubborn to accept that it is the winning maneuver to me lol.
Maybe too tired. He is not 20 anymore. After 4 hours + of play it's difficult to stay focused.
Zhu Jiner боролась до конца с Легендой, анализировала партию вместе с Легендой, расставила фигуры Иванчуку после партии, она была скромна и профессиональна, было очень приятно за ней наблюдать, великолепный момент!
Two individuals from great civilization and heritage.
4:50 pawn promoted to pawn
The most awkward yet amazing post game analysis!
A legend vs a future legend
China has so many amazing lady chess players
Chucky is very dramatic... lmao😂
"Taking your loss is an essential part of the game." - P.W.
Let's face it...Ivanchuk is a LEGEND in the chess world. His masterful game against Garry Kasparov at the Linares tournament in 1991 is considered one of the most memorable chess matches. Ivanchuk, playing white, defeated Kasparov using the Sicilian Defense, Canal-Sokolsky (Nimzovich-Rossolimo, Moscow) attack. This victory was significant since Kasparov was the reigning World Champion at the time! What I find sad is that chess legends like Ivanchuk...and others...begin to lose their "sharpness" as they get older...and they start losing to these young and upcoming superstars who are barely adults! Chess engines have contributed to the astronomical rise in chess strength (especially for youths) over the past twenty years.
he didn't lose...
Yes, I know he didn’t lose this particular game. But that doesn’t change the overall point of my comment. Chess legends like Ivanchuk…who are inevitably getting on in years…are now at the mercy of these young and upcoming chess superstars who may have learned the moves just a few short years ago…largely because of the use of engines to enhance and accelerate the learning process. Frankly, it’s hard for me to wrap my head around that…because the experience and wisdom of chess legends like Ivanchuk cannot be acquired overnight!
He didn't lose. He is old and he's still a beast @@vcliburn
@@vcliburn you literally said "they start losing to these young and upcoming superstars" but anyway maintaining a draw at old age actually shows sharpness is not dull yet counter to your melodramatic narrative
@@AdamLuiTube It's really not a "melodramatic narrative" when you look at it from the standpoint that a player with Ivanchuk's vast experience should be expected to beat...and not just draw...these young players repeatedly, and with no difficulty at all. But that's simply not the case. This is in no way a criticism or a negative reflection on Ivanchuk, but rather a rude awakening of how chess learning has evolved so rapidly in recent years. For example, Fischer grew up in the 1940s & 50s, and he obviously had no access to chess engines. At that time he was a very rare exception. However, nowadays such "talents" are much more commonplace...not only in the U.S. but worldwide. I can attribute this tremendous rise in chess "talent" among youths to the use of powerful chess engines in learning, studying, and practicing chess. Nothing more, and nothing less.
0:56
Horrible blunder from Chucky
Of course he had to play
1....Rb1+ 2.Kd2 c1=Q+ 3.Rxc1 Rxc1 4.Kxc1 g3 5.Rf1 Be2
And white is totally lost because one of black pawns will promote
Once you know Idea 1... Rb1+ , it is easy even to win it vs tricky and evil Stockfish. But of course you have to stop for a 20 -30 sec and calculate a little bit and find it . Ivanchuk rushed , played Kh5 too quickly and winning moment was gone.
Yes, I saw what Zhu Jiner shown him but imao it was not so easy to calculate on that time. Ivanchuk played good enough. It reminds me somehow the candidates 2024 game Gukesh - Abasov where I think the last one was pretty sure it's a draw, but the king of Gukish was better so this type of position is quite hard to calculate even in classics.
Absolutely spectacular!
Zhu was so respectful to Ivanchuk that she did not even remind him that he had lost on time! Amazing!!!
I'm not sure you watched the whole video before posting your comment
What? I think you are drunk or sth
5:33
@@abhisheksreekumar3510 are you another Indian?
From whr did u get your beer ?? 😂😂😅
Assalamualaikum alhamdulillah insyaallah semoga tetap semangat dan bersabar 😊
4:50 illegal move. He should have promoted. Imagine if white had played Kb2 instead of Kxd1 would he have magically put a queen there?
how did he miss rb1+
The man is getting old...
4:50, he should've promote the pawn to a rook or queen with check! What he did was illegal and should stop the clock to summon the arbiter for his illegal move.
Ridiculous and petty subtleties. You have the great honor of playing against Ivanchuk and you get lost in trifles?
@@trumpforever6706 actually it's chess, not checkers, it's hard already, no need to put more pressure cause you are playing a legend. What he did is illegal and I would have called the arbiter, he can forfeit if he does it twice. Just bad stuff from chuky.
@@golendorfjules1838 he was being respectful of her though, expecting her not to be so dumb as to not eat so why place queen down?
Logically, it was like a queen to be taken as quicly as possible. No pawn can be promoted to sergeant-major pawn.
@@trumpforever6706 is it really an honor to play a poor man's kramnik who seems to be exhibiting signs of early dementia?
Kalah kuning