One of my favorite channels. Every time I go out with my telescope to shoot a Messier object I always watch your video on whatever Messier object I choose and learn something about what I’m capturing!! Thank you for these videos they are awesome 😎
I happened to recently be watching some old Sixty Symbols videos from way back in 2009/10. Mike's presentation was certainly never bad but has improved dramatically - his videos have so much clarity to them now and they're great to watch :)
I just want to thank you Brady and the various subject experts you feature across all the Brady Haran network channels for your efforts to educate people. Edit: also shout-out to Sean Riley and computerphile
These guys always say that these open clusters or globular clusters "are kind of boring and unremarkable" but then show how unique and intriguing they get when you study them.
He said this object made it onto Astronomy Picture of the Day, "a year or so back," but the date in his printout says February of 2014. So was this video filmed nearly 4 years ago?
Energy exchange limit or limit for two point to interact. it is a bit hard to write down this thought for me. if two points have relative speed more then speed of light, they not able to interact. but they can interact through the third point. (exactly like dark matter) (try to imagine world WITH OUT this).
I'm waiting for the day when I get to hear a segue like: "Today I want to talk about Messier Object X, *an open cluster!* Along with Messier Object X, there is another object, Object Y, that I would like to talk about. It's similar to Open Cluster X in that it is also visible in the sky at night...." *never mentions X again
Why is in this context a 1000 light years too far for them to probably never interact? I don't think the size of each cluster was mentioned, but in terms of say our galaxy, that's saying these clusters are as close as one 50th of the diameter of the Milky Way. That then seems close to me?
Scott Its quite simple. Most of the matter in the universe is in state of plasma. Clouds of gas, nebulae, stars etc. Its all plasma. Only planets, moons and small rocks(asteroids) are not in plasma state. But according to my knowledge plasma and its behavior is govern by electric and magnetic forces not gravity. These forces are way stronger than weak gravity. I remember have read article where scientists created a model of how our solar system formed - you know this story right? Billions of years ago there was a uniform cloud of gas and this cloud started to collapse and spinning and our sun was formed and all the planets. Well, they made this model, throw in all the parameters and...none large mass in the middle was created and none large objects like planets or moons. The model of how stars and planets are forming based on gravity is not working. Plasma can exist in 3 modes. Dark, glow and arc mode. So if most of the universe is in plasma state and we know that plasma obey electro-magnetic forces why these forces are ignored?
One of my favorite channels. Every time I go out with my telescope to shoot a Messier object I always watch your video on whatever Messier object I choose and learn something about what I’m capturing!! Thank you for these videos they are awesome 😎
I happened to recently be watching some old Sixty Symbols videos from way back in 2009/10. Mike's presentation was certainly never bad but has improved dramatically - his videos have so much clarity to them now and they're great to watch :)
This was a great episode! Defo gonna read that paper. Thanks for linking it in the description.
Cheers for the upload, this is one of my favourite channels. Mike is a champ.
I just want to thank you Brady and the various subject experts you feature across all the Brady Haran network channels for your efforts to educate people.
Edit: also shout-out to Sean Riley and computerphile
I have 11th.
Yeeeeaaahh!!! A new Deep Sky Video is like Christmas!
Brady you are the boss. You made boring topic such as open clusters very interesting for watching
Lovely video. Really great synopsis of a primary paper that I bet I'd have no chance understanding while following up with current evidence. Great!
Glad to watch a new vídeo !
I love open clusters. So beautiful.
Love this videos. Don’t stop
Yes! Exactly what my tired mind needed. Sweet! Ty.
These guys always say that these open clusters or globular clusters "are kind of boring and unremarkable" but then show how unique and intriguing they get when you study them.
Great information!
AHHHH MORE DEEPSKYVIDEOS YESSS!
So you guys are going to do a series on all of the NGC catalog items when you're done with Messier's, right?
at 3:21 evr does astronomy stuff too? Awesome.
He said this object made it onto Astronomy Picture of the Day, "a year or so back," but the date in his printout says February of 2014. So was this video filmed nearly 4 years ago?
Filmed a few weeks ago - sorry I was a little casual with the date of the APOD!
@@AstroMikeMerri A year is nothing in astronomy! 'Or so' could be a century!
Nice! thanks
Energy exchange limit or limit for two point to interact.
it is a bit hard to write down this thought for me.
if two points have relative speed more then speed of light, they not able to interact.
but they can interact through the third point. (exactly like dark matter)
(try to imagine world WITH OUT this).
Haha after "not the most exciting cluster in the world" I was mindlessly expecting "but the most enthusiastic!"
Professor Merrifield is going full Santa by 2019.
'adopted twins', wouldn't that be weird? A couple adopting two kids with the same birthday and age?
Yay! New video! :D
I kinda like to see prof Merrifield wearing handlebar moustache.
I'm waiting for the day when I get to hear a segue like: "Today I want to talk about Messier Object X, *an open cluster!*
Along with Messier Object X, there is another object, Object Y, that I would like to talk about. It's similar to Open Cluster X in that it is also visible in the sky at night...."
*never mentions X again
New camera?
I like Mike
Why is in this context a 1000 light years too far for them to probably never interact? I don't think the size of each cluster was mentioned, but in terms of say our galaxy, that's saying these clusters are as close as one 50th of the diameter of the Milky Way. That then seems close to me?
The radius of M38 is about 13 light years, so yes, 1000 light years is pretty far by open cluster standards.
@@Lexivor Thanks, that does give some perspective on the relative sizes (and my lazyness to google myself). Expected a far greater structure.
Professor M was kind of hard on M38 at the end. I thought this was very interesting.
Wow new lens?????????
I thought so, too. Looks great!
That apple watch, tho.
Looking at outer rim of the galaxy.
that wedding ring is kinda tight, isnt it
"Not the most exciting cluster in the world" erm...
is it an Einstein-Rosen bridge? Trololololol
Electro-magnetic forces must be behind formation of these objects. Gravity is very weak force.
Then fly you fool...
Nemo
What do you mean? And why you call me fool you impolite troglodyte.
Scott
Its quite simple. Most of the matter in the universe is in state of plasma. Clouds of gas, nebulae, stars etc. Its all plasma.
Only planets, moons and small rocks(asteroids) are not in plasma state.
But according to my knowledge plasma and its behavior is govern by electric and magnetic forces not gravity. These forces are way stronger than weak gravity.
I remember have read article where scientists created a model of how our solar system formed - you know this story right?
Billions of years ago there was a uniform cloud of gas and this cloud started to collapse and spinning and our sun was formed and all the planets.
Well, they made this model, throw in all the parameters and...none large mass in the middle was created and none large objects like planets or moons. The model of how stars and planets are forming based on gravity is not working.
Plasma can exist in 3 modes. Dark, glow and arc mode.
So if most of the universe is in plasma state and we know that plasma obey electro-magnetic forces why these forces are ignored?