Karen Read witness saw 'black blob' in the snow | Banfield
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
- A witness in the Karen Read murder trial says she saw a "black blob" in snow on the night John O’Keefe died. Read is charged with second-degree murder in the 2022 death of O'Keefe, her boyfriend at the time. He was found in the snow outside fellow Boston Police Officer Brian Albert's home in Massachusetts. Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent Sean McDonough weighs in on "Banfield."
Ashleigh Banfield is the definitive authority on the nation’s biggest true crime stories. A veteran award-winning journalist, Ashleigh brings a sharp focus to the crime stories gripping America, distilling facts and analyzing context in a way which captures viewers’ interests and imaginations. No one knows the prosecution and the defendants’ cases better than BANFIELD, all the while keeping the victim at the heart of every story we tell - just another reason NewsNation is truly News for All America.
Weeknights at 10pm/9C. #Banfield
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
More from NewsNation: www.newsnationnow.com/
Get our app: trib.al/TBXgYpp
Find us on cable: trib.al/YDOpGyG
How to watch on TV or streaming: trib.al/Vu0Ikij
She didn't see anything
BS. All liar's
Love Sean McDonough. Thanks Ashley for having him on. His perspective is very enlightening.
I would have been more believable Julie Nagals had said "i saw a pink Elephant".
I don’t believe this witness saw everything, sus! She didn’t mention blob during her interview
Free Karen Read she’s innocent being framed💞💞
Kim🇬🇧
The headlights of every car that backed out of the driveway to pass by the house would have shined across the ENTIRE lawn as the car slowly angled out to straighten in the road. Not one person saw, in the bright lights, a large body, excessive blood lost, shoe, hat or 47 pieces of red plastic??
Sean is absolutely correct about the tail light damage and has the proof. Julie Nagel never saw a body and is covering for the Albert family that she is very close to. No one else saw anything on the lawn that night. Thanks for having Sean the investigator on. He is so well informed on the Read case.
If a black blob that was 5 to 6 feet long was on someone’s front long, that could potentially be a person, then, if that person is alive, it is an intruder lurking in wait. A threat to all in the house. Alert! Look out! Or, it is a person who is not conscious, who is in distress, who needs help. Same callout. Help! Either way, for a body to be conscious or subconscious on the lawn is of concern. I can’t believe she said nothing. Makes no sense. SMH.
It's called a shrub.
To answer Ashley's question, you will see that tail light evidence when the defense starts their case in chief.
I’m not buying what the prosecutors are attempting to show. She is innocent from what I’ve seen and heard.
This story has evolved. Trooper Proctor didn’t interview her for eight months. Giving her plenty of time to realize it was important for someone to have seen something on the lawn. Even then, all she could say was that she might’ve seen an “object.” A year and a half after that statement, the object evolved into a “blob”that is 5 to 6 feet long that could be a body. ???
She’s FACTUALLY innocent..this case is wild. I’m from the area! Complete coverup to hide JO reporting on shady stuff by the McAls
This story has evolved. First they were going to blame the snowplow driver. Then someone heard Karen say "did I hit him" and were going to charge her with domestic violence. (The broken glass). When it became apparent that 95 lb Karen Read overpowering 218 lb John O'Keefe wasn't credible they looked elsewhere. Then Jen M. pointed out the cracked tail light on Karen's SUV Proctor grabbed it and took off running. Now it's "she backed up 62' and hit him at 24.2 miles an hour". Only a moron or a Mass. state trooper could believe any of this nonsense.
The snow plow driver came by the 54 Fairview house shortly. after 3:00 am that night and saw no body on or near the lawn of the Albert home! The black blob Julie Nagal supposedly saw is in her drunken imagination.
Or the bushes along the property line. They play semantics with words and play word games here. The bushes would look like a black blob. The fire hydrant and the electrical box is also over there. I think she’s speaking of the bushes. She is kind of right. Those bushes would look like a black blob in the dark. Especially when you’re drunk.
34
Or the azalea bush. When you're self professed blotto what you think you see or don't see is always questionable.
A blob is an X Files thing.
Sean!!!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Ashley, ask Sean about the FBI, and the "non-state grand jury hearing"?
Sean is amazing!
She can't say that she saw a body so the scenario fits for a blob to plant dought, she's not even sure. Blobbing lies
Shall we talk about the footprints seen in video leading to back yard uncovered by leaf blower 🤔
Omg, I missed that!!!
Prosecution case is still up. We won’t see the taillight evidence until the Defense case in chief.
Great show!!! Sean is great!!
Completely intoxicated seeing black blobs yeah ok major sus lock all these liars up
Sean !!!!👍👍👍👍
Yeah, she was really sober too.
Sean is AWESOME and a DEA experienced investigator. His channel is Going Thru The Motions. This case is a wild cover . One “witness” googled How long to Die in the cold well before he was reported missing. CMON!
✌🏻Sean. Just left your rant😂
That "rant" was fabulous. Watched it twice.
Love this guy!
Sean is 💯 right, Karen was framed and it’s not so difficult to imagine that 5 - 8 people makes a coverup and the rest just follows because they either RT l trust them or are afraid of losing their jobs….
Love Sean. Thanks Ashley for having him on your show. I honestly had to laugh because he seemed so prim and proper during your interview but he gets so fired up on his own channel that Sean seemed like a different person all together but I actually love both versions. 😊 The taillight evidence or lack there of will definitely be presented by the defense in full detail but I would be shocked if this case isn't thrown out after the prosecution Rest because I just don't see the Common Wealth ever being able to meet their burden of proof. Something that amazes me is how unvalidated evidence is being allowed into this trial; for instance today a witness named Allie introduced screenshots of text msgs that overlapped two days but there was no actual Date Stamp separating Fri Jan.28 1158pm and into the next day Sat, Jan. 29th when other messages were time stamped say at 1204am... etc. Evidence seems to have been manufactured and these taillight pieces in my opinion fall into this same category... manufactured or planted. Just my thoughts... of course and I have been glued to this trial!
This case is unbelievable! Wow just wow.
Love Sean ❤
Love Sean, just found his channel. Wish Id have found sooner
Where is the video when karen reed came home after dropping her husband off that can prove alot... this case is really crazy
This video, 2 others and her Lexus data are “missing”
@@TheTommyBernhardPodcast wowww that's fishy ASF
All MISSING
The police took her car and phone on 29 January. Police could have erased it.
That's crazy but when I think about the techs could wipe her phone or plant things in her phone because they got the access which is scary ASF 🤔🤔
Did the plow truck driver see that when he reported the ford edge
I dont know about anybody else but does that tailight picture (the one fully intact) is so blurry. Does it look like a whole tailight.
I think she saw a reflection of herself.
Love Sean!
How is 5 am the time of showing the light intact ? They was said twice (5 am)
That's when Karen left her home to look for John at 5:00 am the morning AFTER John was killed.
Why didn’t Julie McCabe say to police that Julie N said she saw something when they were in the car going home that night?
The prosecutor is grasping at straws. The taillight was possibly damaged at John's home when she was backing out of his driveway. Which part don't they understand???
Aliens? 👽 👽 👽 👽 👽 👽 👽
This is an Occam's razor. The simplest answer is most likely the right one. Karen Reid is guilty!
WRONG!!
Wrong. Karen Read is 💯 factually innocent. Catch up please
The prosecutor is grasping at straws. The taillight was possibly damaged at John's home when she was backing out of his driveway. Which part don't they understand???