Thanks Ken for this one. You really simplified it. I still had to relisten to a lot of things you said, as usual, to grasp the ideas. I gain a little more understanding day by day. I watch your science videos daily.
Probably your best shot at the explanation of this topic yet. This attempt sounds a lot more digestible to laymen. I can send this to friends that are not so much into this or are starting.
Spot On!! We were discussing both the three dimensional curvilinear vectors and "pressure fields" in our weekly roundup meeting yesterday afternoon. Thank you for your analogies to help describe these principles to the public. Tesla was correct that space has no properties, and acceleration towards the lowest pressure point appears to be true, at least from our observations. Particle propaganda is a plague.
Great! I am pleased to say that after 5 days of watching your videos intently I am able to coherently experience and follow your thought process. The truth you speak is notable along with your impressive ability to navigate the magnitudinal force vectors of reality. Respect.
Point-non-dimensional infinite electrostatic energy potential --> Discharge -->Electric currents creating magnetic currents (electric power and magnetic volume) Where is our model wrong?: Two electrons seem to cancel their magnetic field --> No, if they would, helium, where two electrons share orbital would not be dimensional, because it would not have magnetism. It has magnetism, it has volume, and we got wrong how EM-dynamics works, which is why Ken is right
Please may I ask for your view on the notion that the universe is expanding? ...My personal research has led me to the conclusion that it is not. As you say, space has no properties and therefore cannot affect matter, hence, galaxies cannot be 'pushed' away... ..?
Hey Ken Wheeler! What about that straight line of sight from the coast of England or Ireland to the bottom of the Isle of Man?? Which is 30-45 miles away....What about that straight line in Nature??
Ether forming crystals.. depending on frequency and energy.. like ether cymatics... based on torus/hyperbole structure.. pressure driven by the Ether... as above so below.. holographic fractal surface info ..
Wisdom teachings gratefully received, thanks Ken! Keep repeating your knowledge of magnetism because it's important we keep hearing these principals over and over. Many thanks
stars appear to me to be just electric luminous spinning energy and they call them galaxies .They are all over our head at different levels and not very far.
Stig Martin - I would say it’s other way around, but like you said, you’re entitled to your own opinion. And I won’t add goofy emojis to attempt to make fun of you.
@@LOGOS_Official The other way around? That is utterly ridiculous. Without having to go high into the atmosphere, there are several ways to confirm the curvature of the Earth. One way is to stand on a beach and watch a ship sail into the distance. Because of the "curvature of the planet", the ship gives the appearance that it's sinking once it gets close to the horizon. A few hours later, that same ship "reappears" because it's coming back to dock. I've witnessed it hundreds of times. A second way to KNOW the Earth is curved is to understand the construction of long bridges. They're built with a curve to correlate with the Earth's curvature. That being said, I won't use emojis to make fun of you like the other guy did. I'll just get right to the point and say you're a fucking idiot.
@Ken can you explain WaterWitching? I am capable of using two common cothes hangers to locate water lines underground. I was told few people are capable of it. Is it magnetism beteen my self holding the rods and the water? What creates the pull for the rods to seperate when crossing the water lines? The rods straighten out in the directions the water flows. I had an old man teach me this 20 years ago and have used it over a hundred times to locate existing water and sewer lines in the ground.i used this method when installing poles in the ground for PrimeStar satellite dish systems back in the day.
Can you make that video again with your paint program where you inverted the dielectric inertial plane and magnetic field? Dielectric inertial plane on the outside and magnetic field on the inside if i remember correctly. I can't find your old video on it you made few years back.
This is Great! But pleas explain nuclear power. If it’s not atoms bumping then what is generating the all the power? You touched on it here but not clear on it?
"The energy of the explosion comes not from converting matter to energy, but from the kinetic inter-atomic energy released. This energy did not just appear from a transformation of matter into energy as Einstein and his fools have forwarded, but was always contained within the internal motions of the inter-atomic and nucleal dielectric inertia. The only transformation that occurred was the conversion of rotational kinetic energy into linear kinetic energy. An atomic explosion, for example, is nothing more complex than many many trillion tightly wound pocket watches which are near instantly disassembled releasing their stored inertia." page 31, third edition
You need to explain more on low pressure points Does centrifugal have low pressure points Does centripetal have low pressure points Also explain why don’t Magnet’s have polarities Please don’t give me a thumbs up 👍 Explanation is better Thanks 🙏 Ken
Hey Mac that’s not nice to say brosef We all don’t know the truth about the universe all we can do is have theory I just like more explanation on topics to clearly make sense of what one ☝️ preaches Please don’t be like that Everyone should respect ✊ others even though they don’t agree with one another god bless and love ❤️
When you say things like 'the only thing that gives magnitude in the visible universe is magnetism', it almost seems like that was a known fact at some point and the similarity of the words it's not random (ofc it wouldn't be totally random in any case, but it's too not-random). Like we are remembering rather than learning, as Plato put it. About homeostasis, does that mean entrophy is a result of homeostasis? Or the same thing under a different name/interpretation? (I was told all things tend to entrophy)
My head is spinning! Thank you! I would agree! If you could separate and categorize your videos, maybe I could get a better understanding! Thank you again! You and Eric Dollard would have a good talk!🙃
What do you mean when you say a magnetic field is a force vector and that a force creates space. but then you say don't confuse that with the reification or inflation of space? Space has no properties? So what space is it creating? Is it the "space" we are living in? Or some "conceptualized space" in some theory?
I am interested in what you said re: the universe being an inverse tree, and that it would take a long video to explain .. for a future vid if discussing that interests you .. thx
Bit off topic-But hoping in the relevance to new comments/new vid I could get an answer from you that I might have missed in another vid! • What dictionary or sources would you recommend for learning Ancient Greek ? -Thanks man
Wait a minute so is the field around a magnet an actual whole 3d toroid or is it just a fast spinning 3d spaghetti vector that just appears as a toroid because of its fast spin ?
Hippies have jumped on it, so main stream science dismisses all of it. It would he cool to have someone with an actual grasp of it explain and experiment
What about longitudinal pressure? JJ Thomson, in "electricity and matter" states the faraday tubes moving longitudinal does not drag along Aether. So, no pressure? But this same longitudinal motion is capable of charging (really fast) a capacitor creating a dielectric field. Which when moved transversly (current discharge) does create pressure... So we have pressure generation without pressure mediation?
Master Ivo: If you think about it, pressure not originating from pressure mediation must be necessary, since the phenomenal universe must have come from somewhere; something must cause the aether to ripple to begin with. The better question is what, or who, is throwing rocks in the cosmic waters, or winding the cosmic clock, so to speak.
I appreciate the knowledge and theories you are sharing, but as a journalistic researcher with no formal science background, I find you talk so fast, with your words often running together, that it is difficult for a 'layperson' like myself to really 'get' what you're explaining. Would you consider slowing down and clearly articulating your words in your 'presentation speaking', because it would make it a lot easier to really grasp the full extent of what you're conveying. Thanks.
I've seen a ton of your videos and this is perhaps your best. But, forgive my ignorance, are you saying that magnetism is the fundamental 'force' not electricity?
Thank you for the answer Are you planing on printing your book. Reading long text on a screen is hard. Not to mention limiting. BTW have you seen the works of Dr David Hawkins Thanks again.
Thanks brother! I would love to see your teach on the poincare disk geometry as it relates to the cosmos. I know how busy you are, but for the mean time, can you recommend a good read on it? I feel this is what I need to predict the "where" for major weather... Peace and Cheers!
Yes. Happens all on its own. This is the experience. Like the moon Wa"x"ing and Wa"n"ing. Wa=water x=expanding n=contracting. It's a cycle as we head towards the null point in the centripetal vortex. Peace and cheers!
I don't understand re: you say space has attributes but no properties. I was of the understanding (from researching plasma physics) that so-called 'empty space' in the cosmos is 99.9% plasma. I suppose the remaining .01% of space that is "not plasma" is the "ultra-high energy electrostatic condensate" you refer to, of 'physical matter'. So where is this "empty space"?
@@anitareasontobelieve7375: no, what you describe are all phenomena, which are manifestiations of the ether rippling, and what Ken is talking about in this video. My question is about what causes the initial ripples, i.e. what mysterious force brings manifestation into being.
If they went near it with all the fortified inorganic iron in their blood they would get tiny little magnets floating around sticking together. Mainstream medical calls it Leukemia. Stay away from MRI's Cat scans, etc. iyoutome.com/magnets
ken, this is way off subject I realize, but iv just watched the latest vid from the hairman, seems we all should dump our dslr,s ? they are crap, had it ect. seems cannon mirrorless and all their new lenses are the only way to go ?????
Cognitive dissonance is what affects time travel. When we gain true knowledge we "time" travel. As Led Zeppelin sang, "yes there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road you are on". Peace and Cheers!
The ether when disturbed, i.e. brought out of balance, will always seek back to its point of lowest potential, i.e. completely at rest; it's analogous to a still pond in which you throw a rock, causing waves to ripple in the medium of water temporarily, until finally dissipating into its point of lowest potential, once more becoming still. The better question is what causes the disturbances to begin with; who is throwing rocks in the cosmic waters? That's the mystery of mysteries.
@@nicholastidemann9384 Hi Nicholas. so all matter is made because of magnetism, right? could you explain a bit about how magnetism is making matter. thanks.
Alex Davidson I’d like to work on that with ya. I think I’m close to visualizing what Ken teaches. We know pure inertia has no movement and that light is an aether disturbance that illuminates matter. So why is there illumination well because it’s the same as why is there matter. Because there is incoherent matter taking up space and manifestation is creating the purterbations in an infinite cycle until we are coherent again. Jamaicans call it one love. Ken calls it the absolute. Peace and cheers
You say that nature is simple then why invent counterspace ? You say that space has no attributs like preasure then what is counterspac if not 0 space preasure ? There are some experiments that rotating big mass dragg near space with it. It can be eather but why add another medium if we can add properity to space (im not talking about einsteins gravity and space bending its stupid and observations of galaxy rotation prove it )
Not everything is relative. All observations are biased but they all point towards the truth. There are things that exist from all perspectives, therefore they are universal (i.e. not relative). Reality is absolute and exists outside of our perception.
@@rodarywindsorcleveland8506 😊I'm also quite funny...hence the 😉wink. Lol. Life is Good. God Bless. Having a blast hangin out with the cool kids on Kens channel. 😎☀☀
@@ePLAYASLAYA lol "Its research".. even the people devloping QCD have no idea wtf is going on.. that's how theorys are sometimes.. Theoria proberbly solved "Quantum gravity" in his teens or sleep.. .. so im asking HIM is quantum gravity a waste of time?..
@@leeparker5822 and I'm telling YOU that HE would probably tell YOU the same thing it's not even about who's right or wrong the "quantum theorists" or Ken I'm just telling you to grow up and decide for yourself eventually if you're smart you'll find the right answer and if you're not smart you wont either way if you're not smart you're not ever gonna really know so learn how to be smart and decide for yourself maybe do some experiments
@@ePLAYASLAYA so: if one person holds knowledge that could change the the universe and save decades of research (AND experiments) and billions of ££££££££ you shouldn't ask? CAN'T WAIT TO SEE IF "AI" agrees with you.. if that says no to us for the same reasoning ? Is the world just going to say "ok no problem"
Hey ken I have learned alot from your videos i wanted to see if i can show you something with magnets I'm sure you know but wanted to make sure everything you say is the truth but please reply so i could mention it if you could spare a few mins I'm derek
Ken, you are a savant. A genius. You challenge my intillect and force me to think. Did you know Einstein's theory of relativity is used to explain why we can't measure or scientifically prove earth is spinning or moving through space. What? No way! You said homeostasis. That's funny. So is Einstein. Is holography related to magnetism? If you chop a hologram into pieces the pieces retain the whole like a magnet. No?
@@Paygelove that's an interesting concept. I guess all the people who have gone out to get tripods which operate in counter rotation to the rotation of the earth so then you can get still images of celestial objects are just ripping people off, and that the people with camera's with zooms that are great enough to be heavily effected by the rotation of the earth truly don't need it at all, because the Earth is not rotating ... hmm now that's an interesting riddle isn't it .. but I guess it's all just marketing fluff just to make more money ..... smh Also the problem that they had with GPS when it was in its infancy wasn't corrected with similar mathematics. If you were ask a long range sniper if they have to compensate for the Coriolis effect either as they can just aim and shoot over a mile without the earth rotating the object that they are shooting at move out of the way. But it's okay, there is absolutely no practical applications and proof of the rotation of the Earth.
Thanks Ken for this one. You really simplified it. I still had to relisten to a lot of things you said, as usual, to grasp the ideas. I gain a little more understanding day by day.
I watch your science videos daily.
Probably your best shot at the explanation of this topic yet. This attempt sounds a lot more digestible to laymen. I can send this to friends that are not so much into this or are starting.
You really think this or are you just kidding?
@@MychelleSeymourHeyyouremember do you really think particles mediate all interactions or are you insane?
@@maeton-gaming I apologize, I shouldn't have questioned another's beliefs. Sometimes I just get ahead of myself.🙏
Watching your videos makes me believe sanity still exists. Keep it it up and thanks!
Spot On!! We were discussing both the three dimensional curvilinear vectors and "pressure fields" in our weekly roundup meeting yesterday afternoon. Thank you for your analogies to help describe these principles to the public. Tesla was correct that space has no properties, and acceleration towards the lowest pressure point appears to be true, at least from our observations. Particle propaganda is a plague.
You are so so AWESOME my brother.
And I though DAN WINTER spoke fast... WOW
Thank You
Your work is BADLY NEEDED in our Information False World.
ALOHA
i know you have a lot of videos but is it possible to categorize your science videos away from your film and camera videos. Thanks.
Umm, the titles do that for you...
... playlists? ... maybe Ken could create a nice little playlist just for this, would be awesome...
It would be too easy for censorship! Like this keeps them in suspense
You can add them to your own playlist. You do have to go thru them once but then it’s done. And you can share the playlist to others
🤙🏻
Another brilliant video Ken. Please don't stop making these.
Great!
I am pleased to say that after 5 days of watching your videos intently I am able to coherently experience and follow your thought process. The truth you speak is notable along with your impressive ability to navigate the magnitudinal force vectors of reality. Respect.
Extremely useful explanation in helping me think with more clairvoyance. Thank you very much.
Point-non-dimensional infinite electrostatic energy potential --> Discharge -->Electric currents creating magnetic currents (electric power and magnetic volume)
Where is our model wrong?: Two electrons seem to cancel their magnetic field --> No, if they would, helium, where two electrons share orbital would not be dimensional, because it would not have magnetism. It has magnetism, it has volume, and we got wrong how EM-dynamics works, which is why Ken is right
Brilliant video..Firing on all cylinders in this one uncle Kenny!
Please may I ask for your view on the notion that the universe is expanding?
...My personal research has led me to the conclusion that it is not. As you say, space has no properties and therefore cannot affect matter, hence, galaxies cannot be 'pushed' away...
..?
Amazing, can’t get enough of the physics talks. Thank you so much Ken!!!
You look naturally joyful here! Thank you!
I have made a couple snarky comments here before, but this was superbly expressed.
Hey Ken Wheeler! What about that straight line of sight from the coast of England or Ireland to the bottom of the Isle of Man?? Which is 30-45 miles away....What about that straight line in Nature??
Thanks Ken, for putting forth the effort to share these ideas with us.
I've always thought of matter as a standing wave of harmonics. This is the first I've heard the term " electro static condensate". Bravo sir!
amazing it would have been nice to have been taught this in 9th grade or earlier... but its never to late for the facts.
Great as usually... Can you make a quick explanation of why the planets orbiting the sun, and why they don't clashing into it? Thanks :)
“Condensite!”I love it! Yes😊☀️. Awesome video and you have a gift for breaking down these difficult concepts.
Ether forming crystals.. depending on frequency and energy.. like ether cymatics... based on torus/hyperbole structure.. pressure driven by the Ether... as above so below.. holographic fractal surface info ..
Magnitude of Order .. in a platonic Musical Scale system .. sacred geometry ..
Resonance Science Foundation UA-cam interview Jean-Pierre Petit ... he mumbles a bit but have a fantastic concept of universe..
Wisdom teachings gratefully received, thanks Ken! Keep repeating your knowledge of magnetism because it's important we keep hearing these principals over and over. Many thanks
your argument is brilliant
stars appear to me to be just electric luminous spinning energy and they call them galaxies .They are all over our head at different levels and not very far.
The Earth is a sphere.
Code Tech - that’s a debate that’s been going on for thousands of years, we still don’t have a fool proof way of proving it’s a sphere.
Stig Martin - I would say it’s other way around, but like you said, you’re entitled to your own opinion. And I won’t add goofy emojis to attempt to make fun of you.
@@LOGOS_Official The other way around? That is utterly ridiculous. Without having to go high into the atmosphere, there are several ways to confirm the curvature of the Earth. One way is to stand on a beach and watch a ship sail into the distance. Because of the "curvature of the planet", the ship gives the appearance that it's sinking once it gets close to the horizon. A few hours later, that same ship "reappears" because it's coming back to dock. I've witnessed it hundreds of times. A second way to KNOW the Earth is curved is to understand the construction of long bridges. They're built with a curve to correlate with the Earth's curvature. That being said, I won't use emojis to make fun of you like the other guy did. I'll just get right to the point and say you're a fucking idiot.
Thank you for sharing. I believe parts of reality are slipping into my head. 👍🏻
@Ken can you explain WaterWitching?
I am capable of using two common cothes hangers to locate water lines underground. I was told few people are capable of it.
Is it magnetism beteen my self holding the rods and the water? What creates the pull for the rods to seperate when crossing the water lines? The rods straighten out in the directions the water flows. I had an old man teach me this 20 years ago and have used it over a hundred times to locate existing water and sewer lines in the ground.i used this method when installing poles in the ground for PrimeStar satellite dish systems back in the day.
Can you make that video again with your paint program where you inverted the dielectric inertial plane and magnetic field? Dielectric inertial plane on the outside and magnetic field on the inside if i remember correctly. I can't find your old video on it you made few years back.
This is Great! But pleas explain nuclear power. If it’s not atoms bumping then what is generating the all the power? You touched on it here but not clear on it?
"The energy of the explosion comes not from converting matter to energy, but from the kinetic inter-atomic energy released. This energy did not just appear from a transformation of matter into energy as Einstein and his fools have forwarded, but was always contained within the internal motions of the inter-atomic and nucleal dielectric inertia. The only
transformation that occurred was the conversion of rotational kinetic energy into linear kinetic energy. An atomic explosion, for example, is nothing more complex than many many trillion tightly wound pocket watches which are near instantly disassembled releasing their stored inertia." page 31, third edition
Homeostasis is in a spherical property=even magnetism... The proof is in the fact that you can push a magnet in every polarity equating to a sphere..
thank you brotha. it's nice to stop looking. i imagine a world based upon this perspective of science....
and can only hope.
There are straight lines in the universe.)))
Crystals my friend....
Even your favorite bysmuth forms straight lines.
you da man Ken. what are your thoughts on the rodin coil?
Creepy smile-thing. Still watched.
brave and woke
You need to explain more on low pressure points
Does centrifugal have low pressure points
Does centripetal have low pressure points
Also explain why don’t Magnet’s have polarities
Please don’t give me a thumbs up 👍
Explanation is better
Thanks 🙏 Ken
Hey Mac that’s not nice to say brosef
We all don’t know the truth about the universe all we can do is have theory
I just like more explanation on topics to clearly make sense of what one ☝️ preaches
Please don’t be like that
Everyone should respect ✊ others even though they don’t agree with one another god bless and love ❤️
When you say things like 'the only thing that gives magnitude in the visible universe is magnetism', it almost seems like that was a known fact at some point and the similarity of the words it's not random (ofc it wouldn't be totally random in any case, but it's too not-random). Like we are remembering rather than learning, as Plato put it.
About homeostasis, does that mean entrophy is a result of homeostasis? Or the same thing under a different name/interpretation? (I was told all things tend to entrophy)
My head is spinning!
Thank you!
I would agree! If you could separate and categorize your videos, maybe I could get a better understanding!
Thank you again!
You and Eric Dollard would have a good talk!🙃
Mine is to.... Most times. 🤪 But I assume it's cause I'm a dizzy girl. Lol ditsy. Whatever.
So light is the thin place where the field becomes matter?
What do you mean when you say a magnetic field is a force vector and that a force creates space. but then you say don't confuse that with the reification or inflation of space? Space has no properties? So what space is it creating? Is it the "space" we are living in? Or some "conceptualized space" in some theory?
I am interested in what you said re: the universe being an inverse tree, and that it would take a long video to explain .. for a future vid if discussing that interests you .. thx
have you ever explained your ink? obviously each one means something big to you and I love the fact 1/phi-3 is it.
Bit off topic-But hoping in the relevance to new comments/new vid I could get an answer from you that I might have missed in another vid! • What dictionary or sources would you recommend for learning Ancient Greek ? -Thanks man
Watching these videos always makes me correct my posture.
Any thoughts on the work of Dan Winter?
Thank you for this video. It is a very nice reiteration synthesis. Bravo
Wait a minute so is the field around a magnet an actual whole 3d toroid or is it just a fast spinning 3d spaghetti vector that just appears as a toroid because of its fast spin ?
It's a torroid made up of curved vectors all next to each other around the circle.
Thank you Ken.
Polycontrast interference photography can can be adjusted to notice field density differences.
Hippies have jumped on it, so main stream science dismisses all of it. It would he cool to have someone with an actual grasp of it explain and experiment
What about longitudinal pressure?
JJ Thomson, in "electricity and matter" states the faraday tubes moving longitudinal does not drag along Aether. So, no pressure?
But this same longitudinal motion is capable of charging (really fast) a capacitor creating a dielectric field. Which when moved transversly (current discharge) does create pressure...
So we have pressure generation without pressure mediation?
Master Ivo:
If you think about it, pressure not originating from pressure mediation must be necessary, since the phenomenal universe must have come from somewhere; something must cause the aether to ripple to begin with. The better question is what, or who, is throwing rocks in the cosmic waters, or winding the cosmic clock, so to speak.
Seems everything comes down to Ether or Aether. What is the explanation of what the Ether or Aether is?
How can you talk about ether on one hand and then say space has no properties on the other. Can you explain what you define as ether. Thanks
you see some kind of insane contradiction where none exists, space is NOTHING
Thank you for your reply
This is one of my favorite if not favorite of your video's yet. Love your video's on understanding how reality & Nature work's.
I appreciate the knowledge and theories you are sharing, but as a journalistic researcher with no formal science background, I find you talk so fast, with your words often running together, that it is difficult for a 'layperson' like myself to really 'get' what you're explaining. Would you consider slowing down and clearly articulating your words in your 'presentation speaking', because it would make it a lot easier to really grasp the full extent of what you're conveying. Thanks.
Of course, naturally.
Would this mean that there are no dimensions in space I'd like to know
I've seen a ton of your videos and this is perhaps your best. But, forgive my ignorance, are you saying that magnetism is the fundamental 'force' not electricity?
Electricity is manifested because of magnetism and dielectricity
3. you are using sound to describe light
Thank you for the answer
Are you planing on printing your book. Reading long text on a screen is hard. Not to mention limiting.
BTW have you seen the works of Dr David Hawkins
Thanks again.
Love it!
Thanks brother! I would love to see your teach on the poincare disk geometry as it relates to the cosmos. I know how busy you are, but for the mean time, can you recommend a good read on it? I feel this is what I need to predict the "where" for major weather... Peace and Cheers!
Sorry, one more question again, can space be uncreated?
Sure, just fill it up.
Yes. Happens all on its own. This is the experience. Like the moon Wa"x"ing and Wa"n"ing. Wa=water x=expanding n=contracting. It's a cycle as we head towards the null point in the centripetal vortex. Peace and cheers!
Did you finish the booklet on light?
working on it
@@alexdavidson7785 yes but light is not only visible. That is only a small portion of it.
Can I know this is off the subject but what causes lightning
Nothing more than static charge from clouds to ground.
Can you explain your take on diamagnetism of water
“The incommensurability of the field pressure of a force vector” I see i see
Does an EMP effect a DC power line like an AC power line?
I don't understand re: you say space has attributes but no properties. I was of the understanding (from researching plasma physics) that so-called 'empty space' in the cosmos is 99.9% plasma. I suppose the remaining .01% of space that is "not plasma" is the "ultra-high energy electrostatic condensate" you refer to, of 'physical matter'. So where is this "empty space"?
Ken means space in general, like what is in a vacuum chamber, not "Space, the final frontier".
@@codetech5598 Got it.
I truly love your videos and really would like to perhaps throw some things your way to think about..? In all love ❤️
What precisely is the force which causes the disturbances in the ether which give rise to phenomena? The One?
Those are varried. Burning does illumination/light. Giant bodies do gravity/magnetism. The perturbations are many.
@@anitareasontobelieve7375: no, what you describe are all phenomena, which are manifestiations of the ether rippling, and what Ken is talking about in this video.
My question is about what causes the initial ripples, i.e. what mysterious force brings manifestation into being.
lets say there was a magnet that was a pyramid at 200ft tall. what would it be like for the people, environment, ect.?
If they went near it with all the fortified inorganic iron in their blood they would get tiny little magnets floating around sticking together. Mainstream medical calls it Leukemia. Stay away from MRI's Cat scans, etc. iyoutome.com/magnets
ken, this is way off subject I realize, but iv just watched the latest vid from the hairman, seems we all should dump our dslr,s ? they are crap, had it ect. seems cannon mirrorless and all their new lenses are the only way to go ?????
Dude, MAGNetism - MAGNitude!
Do a video on the PoinCare disk model
please
Good job sir 👍 Thank you 🙏
No permanent matter? What about the Emerald Tablets?
Ken this is one of your best
key aspect
Are you trying to say sunshine is aftermath of premade galaxy? Lol....initialsMN
what about time travel? how can it be done?
Cognitive dissonance is what affects time travel. When we gain true knowledge we "time" travel. As Led Zeppelin sang, "yes there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road you are on". Peace and Cheers!
What Humans's Call #Space is Not.
BRO THE FUCKING SAFIRE PROJECT IS TRIPPY ASF...
Excellent video, but why doesn't the moon seek homeostasis and slam into the earth?
Hi Ken. Do you have an opinion on the work of The Thunderbolts Project and/or Nassim Haramein?
Hi Ken. what makes matter dissipate.
The ether when disturbed, i.e. brought out of balance, will always seek back to its point of lowest potential, i.e. completely at rest; it's analogous to a still pond in which you throw a rock, causing waves to ripple in the medium of water temporarily, until finally dissipating into its point of lowest potential, once more becoming still.
The better question is what causes the disturbances to begin with; who is throwing rocks in the cosmic waters? That's the mystery of mysteries.
@@nicholastidemann9384 Very well said. "who is throwing the rocks in the cosmic waters?" We are..... Go ahead bite the big apple :-)
@@nicholastidemann9384 Hi Nicholas. so all matter is made because of magnetism, right? could you explain a bit about how magnetism is making matter. thanks.
Alex Davidson I’d like to work on that with ya. I think I’m close to visualizing what Ken teaches. We know pure inertia has no movement and that light is an aether disturbance that illuminates matter. So why is there illumination well because it’s the same as why is there matter. Because there is incoherent matter taking up space and manifestation is creating the purterbations in an infinite cycle until we are coherent again. Jamaicans call it one love. Ken calls it the absolute. Peace and cheers
So is The Great attractor the universal null point?
Hahahaha yes!!! So like a child, now i want to know why energy condensates( ie mass) searches for homeostasis?
Because it "moves" towards the lowest pressure.
Stop calling airhead that way.
You say that nature is simple then why invent counterspace ? You say that space has no attributs like preasure then what is counterspac if not 0 space preasure ? There are some experiments that rotating big mass dragg near space with it.
It can be eather but why add another medium if we can add properity to space (im not talking about einsteins gravity and space bending its stupid and observations of galaxy rotation prove it )
add a medium? that IS THE MEDIUM ROFL !!
If space is nothing, counterspace is something. At least that's what I gather.
Everything is relative. All observations are biased by the observer’s frame of reference.
I think Ken is describing the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
Not everything is relative. All observations are biased but they all point towards the truth. There are things that exist from all perspectives, therefore they are universal (i.e. not relative). Reality is absolute and exists outside of our perception.
You Kick Ass!! I are getting really smart😉appreciate You, I do.
@@rodarywindsorcleveland8506 😊I'm also quite funny...hence the 😉wink. Lol. Life is Good. God Bless. Having a blast hangin out with the cool kids on Kens channel. 😎☀☀
@@rodarywindsorcleveland8506 I'm gonna check out Einstein. Cracks me up the way Ken busts on him. Lol.
Is 4th edition available? Can not find it.
YOU DON KNOW ME. YOU DON KNOW MY LIFE!!! 😤😤🤓🤔🤔🤔
Alex Davidson what you talkin about
Alex Davidson ok
1. Moon shadow is warmer than moon light.
Really like these videos when u cover more of these physic theory concepts I find it fascinating thanx
Hi Ken, What is pressure in relation to fractals? It seems fractals exist before the pressure or space. Some call these archetypes I guess.
Sounds like Newton was Short Sighted. Only short lines seem straight. Hopefully people will start to thinking in 3D.
Please,, should I stop "quantum gravity reseach" (QCD) don't want to waste another year of my life??? :(.....
If you even have to ask that question for someone else to answer then maybe you should just suck your own thumb and eat baby food
@@ePLAYASLAYA lol "Its research".. even the people devloping QCD have no idea wtf is going on.. that's how theorys are sometimes.. Theoria proberbly solved "Quantum gravity" in his teens or sleep.. .. so im asking HIM is quantum gravity a waste of time?..
@@ePLAYASLAYA and you try doing math in 8 dimensions and see if it's that easy
@@leeparker5822 and I'm telling YOU that HE would probably tell YOU the same thing it's not even about who's right or wrong the "quantum theorists" or Ken I'm just telling you to grow up and decide for yourself eventually if you're smart you'll find the right answer and if you're not smart you wont either way if you're not smart you're not ever gonna really know so learn how to be smart and decide for yourself maybe do some experiments
@@ePLAYASLAYA so: if one person holds knowledge that could change the the universe and save decades of research (AND experiments) and billions of ££££££££ you shouldn't ask? CAN'T WAIT TO SEE IF "AI" agrees with you.. if that says no to us for the same reasoning ? Is the world just going to say "ok no problem"
Other nature seek homeostasis? I was lead to this video in hopes of learning how to manipulate the nonsense but i guess I came to a dead end.
Hey ken I have learned alot from your videos i wanted to see if i can show you something with magnets I'm sure you know but wanted to make sure everything you say is the truth but please reply so i could mention it if you could spare a few mins I'm derek
Ken, you are a savant. A genius. You challenge my intillect and force me to think. Did you know Einstein's theory of relativity is used to explain why we can't measure or scientifically prove earth is spinning or moving through space. What? No way!
You said homeostasis. That's funny. So is Einstein. Is holography related to magnetism? If you chop a hologram into pieces the pieces retain the whole like a magnet. No?
@@Paygelove that's an interesting concept. I guess all the people who have gone out to get tripods which operate in counter rotation to the rotation of the earth so then you can get still images of celestial objects are just ripping people off, and that the people with camera's with zooms that are great enough to be heavily effected by the rotation of the earth truly don't need it at all, because the Earth is not rotating ... hmm now that's an interesting riddle isn't it .. but I guess it's all just marketing fluff just to make more money ..... smh
Also the problem that they had with GPS when it was in its infancy wasn't corrected with similar mathematics.
If you were ask a long range sniper if they have to compensate for the Coriolis effect either as they can just aim and shoot over a mile without the earth rotating the object that they are shooting at move out of the way.
But it's okay, there is absolutely no practical applications and proof of the rotation of the Earth.
Bending unicorn farts!