@@Robert-ty3qi trump is a lame duck before he's even inaugurated. He can't be stabbed in the back because he doesn't care about any policy. He just wanted the big seat again because he has a power fetish. That's all he wants. He doesn't give a shit what his cabinet does.
@@Robert-ty3qino, but at work I generally like to staff my team with people that are not afraid to push back against me and to provide different perspectives. If you’ve ever held any kind of a job in a team based environment you’d quickly realize the value in having competing smart minds in a room that don’t subscribe to groupthink
@@Robert-ty3qithat’s a massive overcorrection. The cabinet and executive, other than the president, should be filled with neutral, non-partisan people.
@@kenhiett5266they really don’t. They can’t see a revolution happening in front of them being told by the ppl doing it. That’s how bad the brain rot is.
I'll take that wager. Last time he was advised to take insiders and did take some. This time he choose who he thinks would work best with him to achieve his goals.
Very ridiculous to put Gabbard in this set. Hillary seemed threatened by her in 2016. And it appears that the nyt picked up on the resulting bogus natrative (gossip) initiated by Hillary against Tulsi. Gaetz and RFK do seem terrible.
Tulsi is a member of a cult, the “Science of Identity Foundation”. She is a Hindu nationalist, maligned Obama for not using the term “radical Islam”, and is a stooge for Putin on top of that.
I’ve listened to Tulsi Gabbard speak many times and her opinions on military conflict always included diplomacy and negotiation. She thought that we should talk to Assad in Syria instead of just invading and bombing them. She is in the military so she knows how wrong it is to shoot first and negotiate later.
exactly. NYT can't see past their woke rabies to admit she's a great pick. Would love to dig up what these dipshits had to say about any of these disastrous Biden picks: Yellen, Garland, Buttigieg, Mayorkis, Levine.
@@grumpyoldcat8302- do you mean in 1948 when Israel became a nation and was immediately attacked by the Palestinian Arabs, Egypt, Iraq, TransJordan, and Syria?
I love Gabbards foreign policy takes. Let’s talk to dictators why not? They are the leaders of these countries we need to have diplomacy. The majority of the American People are anti-war and pro diplomacy. I see the Military industrial complex is in your pockets.
What dictators are you talking about ? USA never stopped dealing with, empowering and sometimes crowning dictators MBS , ALSISI (trump favourite dictator) , KING HASAN VI of morroco, KING ABDULLAH of Jordan Those are the arab ones only Even Saddam the acked him all along until 1990 , Husni Mubarak ? Shah Muhammad reza bahlawi of iran ? Chile's Binochat ? Guatemala castillo ? How mant others do you want ?
How did talks Kim Jong Un in the first Trump term end up? Any insights? Don't get me wrong. I was for talking to the guy. But he played with the great businessman president "bigly."
Ross will always, and I mean ALWAYS, find some twisted justification for the Tangerine Tyrant's insanity and repulsiveness. Hard pass on this nonsense.
Ah, this explains why Trump's previous reformation of mail ordered meat, airlines, and casinos went so well. Expertise or knowledge of the industry, who needs it! ;-p
Maybe the NYT is right and this is a terrible mistake. However, maybe not. Britain's arguably greatest post-war Foreign Secretary was Ernest Bevin, who'd previously been a union leader who'd worked all his life in heavy industry. He was an absolutely no-nonsense working class man ruled by facts and common sense. The Oxbridge-educated mandarins in Whitehall adored him, revering his good name to this day.
@@nedludd3641are you actually too stupid to see how utterly incomparable Bevin is to any of these cabinet picks? Fucking hell, just admit you’re okay with fascism already
Being skilled at jockeying to the top of a bureaucracy is the worst type of person for leading an important institution. That's one of the biggest problems with Washington and why Hegseth is an enlightened pick.
NYT: "let's talk about the backgrounds on the trump appointees" Trump admin: hold my beer. You are falling into the same liberal media ecosystem think tank. Far more productive is discussing solutions, alas, just saying.
attacking the trump regime will be critical to the next democratic elections, especially the midterms where democrats have overpolled in the past. 99% of trump's strategy was attacking the Biden presidency
This is what happens when you elect someone to the highest office, ignoring all the glaring warning signs of troubling leadership and basing your vote solely on your wallet.
This is what happens when the democrats totally undermine their own credibility and the democratic process, and prop up a horrible canidate they knew would lose.
@@jeffreycobb6336then you voted to give up your rights. There is a delightful quote from Benjamin Franklin you need to hear: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." This is more true today than ever.
Obama was the first president in history that failed to achieve a 3% growth rate. An astonishing feat of incompetence considering the economy was already shored up. We had nowhere to go but up. As soon as 45's policies had time to take effect, the economic graphs went up like a rocketship. Obama was the epitome of a collegiate mind. All theory with no practical application beyond community organizing. He didn't understand the first thing about the global power structure or how to wield ours. Obama is easily the most overrated president in my lifetime, followed by an international business man with a litany of real world accomplishments.
Actually he has years of experience as president and many more in business. From my point of view, that qualifies him much better than lifetime swamp dwellers who have corruptly enriched themselves off the taxpayers. You'll never understand how disgusted we are with the people you would have govern us for your own very selfish ends.
@@kenhiett5266Uhm, that was after the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. How many years did it take to recover from 1929? Just sayin.
@@kenhiett5266false, the gdp obamas past 3 years was over 3. And the gdp under trump was .1 higher in his first 3 years (before covid)..... .1. Thats hardly anything.
I see the shallow one liner didn't work. Do you have a second one liner? Truth has been cornered by the conservatives who actually do the deep research. All you have left is screaming and stomping your feet and throwing words that end in "ist" around. Good luck because those words have been devalued because of the wonton use and now hold little of their previous strength.
I appreciate sober analysis without all the wild histronics I get out of more mainstream media. I feel like maybe we should stop using that term, cable news hardly qualifies as "mainstream" when a majority of people under 60 aren't watching it at all anymore.
I enjoy listening to how lefties are processing this. I think you guys are failing to appreciate how appointments who are outsiders, or non establishment is a feature and not a bug. The fact that you don’t understand what “trumpification” of a department is, speaks about you. It’s clearly about reform and cutting government waste. I’d anticipate massive layoffs and realignments. Also closing departments as the result of DOGE.
You have no idea how the government actually works if you believe any of this crap. Take a fucking civics course, it’s not that hard to educate yourself
@@no-barknoonan1335Tell that to Israel/Palestine. Tell that to Solemani. Tell that to Venezuela. Quit the bullshit, unless you’re a complete and utter moron, you don’t actually believe they’re *not* warmongers.
Smearing Gaetz as incompetent and a likely pedo, while trying to rationalize all the bad reasons orange man would pick him isn't slanted *enough* for you? lol
Smearing Gaetz as incompetent and a likely pɛð0, while trying to rationalize all the bad reasons orange man would pick him isn't slanted *enough* for you? lol
Smearing Gaetz as incompetent and likely guilty based on unevidenced allegations, while trying to rationalize all the bad reasons orange man would pick him isn't slanted *enough* for you? lol
three time trump voter here, Matt gaetz is rather clownish, but hardly a horrible pick if we're speaking objectively. Speaking subjectively, he's not gonna bring about or back consensus or 'decency' to the AG office that's been lacking in such since William Barr, and even before then under Obama we had awful ag's too.
You should probably do some actual research then. Calling something slanderous when YOU ADMIT TO NOT KNOWING WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT is fucking pathetic. Idiots like this shouldn’t have a say in how our country is run, your incompetence makes you a danger to those around you.
@@grumpyoldcat8302Ma'am, settle down. You have one unit from a night school in Mississippi. The fact that I never heard of him has nothing to do with the slanderous tone and verbiage in the reporting.
French's argument about experience falls flat. In living memory we had JFK (43), Clinton (46) and Obama (47) elected leaders of the Free World. RFK Sr. was 35 when he became his brother's AG. Our current AG and DEFSEC are complete disasters, it would be difficult to do worse.
Rfk jr is one of the (very) few bright spots. His assesment of the issues is spot on, and even if he only does half of what he is claiming we will be far better off. There is ZERO reason why we should be literally subsidizing diabetes with food stamps by allowing them to buy soda, for example.
@@jeffreycobb6336only an idiot would think DOGE is a good idea. The “waste” they plan to get rid of is HEALTHCARE FOR VETERANS? If you support Trump or DOGE then you hate the troops
No, any investigation means that those investigated must hire lawyers and spend a lot of money while living for a long time with threat of prosecution hanging over their heads. I have experience with cases where individuals were wrongfully accused. Even though they were eventually found to be innocent, each case took 3 yrs to resolve and ruined each individuals’ life. Investigations also take up a lot of resources that should be invested into something productive for our country.
@@legion-s7tkeep up the childish deflection lmao. Trump winning doesn’t have anything to do with your constant whataboutism and ad hominem arguments, but you just go right ahead and admit to begin too intellectually stunted to use logic and reason in your thinking.
Once in office, could the 25th Amendment be invoked, submitting, among other evidence, the egregious behavior of Trump during his campaign and, as of now, his cabinet picks?
Doing so would require the Vice President and members of the Executive Cabinet or Congress to determine the President is unfit to hold office, an unlikely situation given..... 1: Vance is riding high on the MAGA train and wouldn't be so stupid to bite the hand that feeds him. 2: Trump will staff his Cabinet entirely with sycophants and toadies who will show unwavering loyalty to him. 3: There's no chance in hell a Republican-majority Congress would invoke the 25th. The only way Trump is leaving office before the end of his 2nd term is by death or some incapacitating health crisis; he won't be removed through impeachment or a Republican coup!
It’s literally his cabinet that votes on that, though. Like, even IF you could convince a majority of the public to support this, you would have to also convince the literal yesmen who you’re opposing the appointment of to begin with
@@Ryan-on5on Thank you for your very comprehensive answer. It was edifying. But I will still keep my hopes up. First, I can't help but see a power struggle in Trump's mix of so many volatile egos. For instance, I envision bitterness ahead for Vance, especially with Musk seemingly acting as V.P., or "co-President". Second, already, Trump is getting a lot of Republican opposition against the Gaetz nomination. Third, Thune is a Mitch McConnell mentee; hat thickens the plot. It's all wishful thinking on my part, I know. Thank you, again.
lol I love how out of touch the NYT is with reality.
You guys are over thinking this. It has nothing to do with anything other than will you bend the knee. Period!!!
So, you'd pick people who would stab you in the back ?
@@Robert-ty3qi trump is a lame duck before he's even inaugurated. He can't be stabbed in the back because he doesn't care about any policy. He just wanted the big seat again because he has a power fetish. That's all he wants. He doesn't give a shit what his cabinet does.
@@Robert-ty3qino, but at work I generally like to staff my team with people that are not afraid to push back against me and to provide different perspectives. If you’ve ever held any kind of a job in a team based environment you’d quickly realize the value in having competing smart minds in a room that don’t subscribe to groupthink
"Bend the knee and kiss the royal ass."
@@Robert-ty3qithat’s a massive overcorrection. The cabinet and executive, other than the president, should be filled with neutral, non-partisan people.
I wager they'll all be fired and replaced long before the end of this administration. Let the Crazy Train begin
Wow, do you not get it.
@@kenhiett5266they really don’t. They can’t see a revolution happening in front of them being told by the ppl doing it. That’s how bad the brain rot is.
I'll take that wager. Last time he was advised to take insiders and did take some. This time he choose who he thinks would work best with him to achieve his goals.
Anyone would be an IDIOT to take you on that wager. :D
@@jeffreycobb6336well the point of a president is to not have much power, and to be counterbalanced by the apparatus of the executive.
Very ridiculous to put Gabbard in this set. Hillary seemed threatened by her in 2016. And it appears that the nyt picked up on the resulting bogus natrative (gossip) initiated by Hillary against Tulsi.
Gaetz and RFK do seem terrible.
Tulsi is a member of a cult, the “Science of Identity Foundation”. She is a Hindu nationalist, maligned Obama for not using the term “radical Islam”, and is a stooge for Putin on top of that.
Putin is dancing in the Kremlin.
I’ve listened to Tulsi Gabbard speak many times and her opinions on military conflict always included diplomacy and negotiation. She thought that we should talk to Assad in Syria instead of just invading and bombing them. She is in the military so she knows how wrong it is to shoot first and negotiate later.
Tell that to Israel/Palestine. Don’t know how anyone can be this braindead
exactly. NYT can't see past their woke rabies to admit she's a great pick. Would love to dig up what these dipshits had to say about any of these disastrous Biden picks: Yellen, Garland, Buttigieg, Mayorkis, Levine.
@@grumpyoldcat8302 And yet here you are
Peace in our time, then?
@@grumpyoldcat8302- do you mean in 1948 when Israel became a nation and was immediately attacked by the Palestinian Arabs, Egypt, Iraq, TransJordan, and Syria?
Gaetz is "gross"?? Please don't underplay. Having sex with underage girls isn't "gross"; it's predatory.
Ah yes, the guilty until proven innocent is such liberal value. Good on you
@@oliversmith2129there was already a lengthy investigation dipshit. You have GOT to stop drinking the Trump cult koolaid
I love Gabbards foreign policy takes. Let’s talk to dictators why not? They are the leaders of these countries we need to have diplomacy. The majority of the American People are anti-war and pro diplomacy. I see the Military industrial complex is in your pockets.
Peace in our time, eh?
That's about to blow up in your face with Ukraine because Putin's been playing Trump for a fool.
What dictators are you talking about ?
USA never stopped dealing with, empowering and sometimes crowning dictators
MBS , ALSISI (trump favourite dictator) , KING HASAN VI of morroco, KING ABDULLAH of Jordan
Those are the arab ones only
Even Saddam the acked him all along until 1990 , Husni Mubarak ? Shah Muhammad reza bahlawi of iran ? Chile's Binochat ? Guatemala castillo ?
How mant others do you want ?
Yeah, talk with war criminals. Totally fine. You are pardoning war criminal soldiers anyway, right? What's the big deal?
How did talks Kim Jong Un in the first Trump term end up? Any insights?
Don't get me wrong. I was for talking to the guy. But he played with the great businessman president "bigly."
Ross will always, and I mean ALWAYS, find some twisted justification for the Tangerine Tyrant's insanity and repulsiveness. Hard pass on this nonsense.
Good bye America, it was fun
Do not obey in advance.
Why are giving the keys to the institutions to people who have no institutional experience? Because that's the first step towards reforming them.
What an idiotic thing to say
@@grumpyoldcat8302RFK is mentally stronger than the Lady/Man running things before.
@@grumpyoldcat8302cry more. Plz my goblet is getting empty.
Ah, this explains why Trump's previous reformation of mail ordered meat, airlines, and casinos went so well. Expertise or knowledge of the industry, who needs it! ;-p
@grumpyoldcat8302 why would I care how the deep state has done things if I want the government to not do a vast majority of those things anymore.
Maybe the NYT is right and this is a terrible mistake. However, maybe not. Britain's arguably greatest post-war Foreign Secretary was Ernest Bevin, who'd previously been a union leader who'd worked all his life in heavy industry. He was an absolutely no-nonsense working class man ruled by facts and common sense. The Oxbridge-educated mandarins in Whitehall adored him, revering his good name to this day.
None of these creatures could wipe the boot of an Ernest Bevin
@@briandelaney9710 - not Elon Musk? not Tulsi?
Notice the “working class” part of your explanation.
@@nedludd3641are you actually too stupid to see how utterly incomparable Bevin is to any of these cabinet picks? Fucking hell, just admit you’re okay with fascism already
@@theoldreliable1105 - that's a good point :)
Being skilled at jockeying to the top of a bureaucracy is the worst type of person for leading an important institution. That's one of the biggest problems with Washington and why Hegseth is an enlightened pick.
Get out of here, shill.
NYT: "let's talk about the backgrounds on the trump appointees" Trump admin: hold my beer. You are falling into the same liberal media ecosystem think tank. Far more productive is discussing solutions, alas, just saying.
attacking the trump regime will be critical to the next democratic elections, especially the midterms where democrats have overpolled in the past. 99% of trump's strategy was attacking the Biden presidency
It's all about the credentials for the intellectual class
This is what happens when you elect someone to the highest office, ignoring all the glaring warning signs of troubling leadership and basing your vote solely on your wallet.
This is what happens when the democrats totally undermine their own credibility and the democratic process, and prop up a horrible canidate they knew would lose.
We voted for the who man and his ideas knowing he is not perfect.
@jeffreycobb6336 also knowing that the alternative was also very far from perfect (and I didnt vote for either one)
@@jeffreycobb6336then you voted to give up your rights. There is a delightful quote from Benjamin Franklin you need to hear:
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
This is more true today than ever.
@@grumpyoldcat8302 The alternative was a bumbling moron who failed upwards all her life
All his picks are creepy.
What the hey man?!
All? That alone shows your ignorance and bias.
@ johnkidd1226 Good. you know? Someone has to call it the way he see it. We can’t all be mindless automatons.
@@johnkidd1226says the Trump cultist throwing a tantrum all over this video
@@grumpyoldcat8302the only one's I've seen throwing tantrums are the fools that thought Cumalla actually had a chance
@@grumpyoldcat8302 Not a cult. Not a tantrum. Why do all you elitists have to be educated in the meaning of such simple words.
Can’t believe that Ross is adopting the position he is. Is he trying to stay in Trump good graces? His argument makes no sense at all.
Can you admit being wrong about the character of America? We are 1980, not 2020. Get bent NYT.
Gaetz was also nominated by an inexperienced, unqualified, personally grosse president. A perfect fit.
Obama was the first president in history that failed to achieve a 3% growth rate. An astonishing feat of incompetence considering the economy was already shored up. We had nowhere to go but up. As soon as 45's policies had time to take effect, the economic graphs went up like a rocketship. Obama was the epitome of a collegiate mind. All theory with no practical application beyond community organizing. He didn't understand the first thing about the global power structure or how to wield ours. Obama is easily the most overrated president in my lifetime, followed by an international business man with a litany of real world accomplishments.
Actually he has years of experience as president and many more in business. From my point of view, that qualifies him much better than lifetime swamp dwellers who have corruptly enriched themselves off the taxpayers. You'll never understand how disgusted we are with the people you would have govern us for your own very selfish ends.
@@kenhiett5266Uhm, that was after the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. How many years did it take to recover from 1929? Just sayin.
@@kenhiett5266false, the gdp obamas past 3 years was over 3. And the gdp under trump was .1 higher in his first 3 years (before covid)..... .1. Thats hardly anything.
I see the shallow one liner didn't work. Do you have a second one liner? Truth has been cornered by the conservatives who actually do the deep research. All you have left is screaming and stomping your feet and throwing words that end in "ist" around. Good luck because those words have been devalued because of the wonton use and now hold little of their previous strength.
It's Moopin' time!
I appreciate sober analysis without all the wild histronics I get out of more mainstream media.
I feel like maybe we should stop using that term, cable news hardly qualifies as "mainstream" when a majority of people under 60 aren't watching it at all anymore.
Good point, but its tough to change an accepted term that everyone understands to mean one thing.
David French is so arrogant and elitist I bet you he thinks he's the smartest person in the room he probably thinks he's smarter than Elon musk
Musk's head is full of figures but he can't manage his way out of a paper bag.
That is not a high bar...
@@MichaelJohnson-vi6eh He is managing a 11 figure networth while you get paid for making comments.
@@MichaelJohnson-vi6eh - Musk can’t find his way out of a paper bag? The guy literally built, launched, and caught a rocket. You’re a fool.
I enjoy listening to how lefties are processing this. I think you guys are failing to appreciate how appointments who are outsiders, or non establishment is a feature and not a bug. The fact that you don’t understand what “trumpification” of a department is, speaks about you. It’s clearly about reform and cutting government waste. I’d anticipate massive layoffs and realignments. Also closing departments as the result of DOGE.
You have no idea how the government actually works if you believe any of this crap. Take a fucking civics course, it’s not that hard to educate yourself
@@grumpyoldcat8302 Educate yourself that you lost and that you don't get a say in any of this. But continue to piss in the storm why don't you
I agree with Ross!!!!!!!! about DOJ and lets have what we voted for!!!!
It is so funny to hear them say Tulsi is the worst pick lmao "Oh no! Trump picked someone who is not a warmonger!"
She literally supports Israel and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Not a warmonger my ass, you don’t know a damn thing
Wait and see, this comment ^ will age like milk. You will see who the warmongers are by the time this is over.
@@no-barknoonan1335Tell that to Israel/Palestine. Tell that to Solemani. Tell that to Venezuela.
Quit the bullshit, unless you’re a complete and utter moron, you don’t actually believe they’re *not* warmongers.
Ross will rationalize any republican move,yikes.
Not like that type of thing is unusual for Democrats or other partisans in general.
Smearing Gaetz as incompetent and a likely pedo, while trying to rationalize all the bad reasons orange man would pick him isn't slanted *enough* for you? lol
Smearing Gaetz as incompetent and a likely pɛð0, while trying to rationalize all the bad reasons orange man would pick him isn't slanted *enough* for you? lol
Smearing Gaetz as incompetent and likely guilty based on unevidenced allegations, while trying to rationalize all the bad reasons orange man would pick him isn't slanted *enough* for you? lol
This is why the night of the 5th came as such a shock to you. Don't bother pretending it didn't.
I'm a new Trump voter. I've never heard of Matt gaetz but this seems rather slanderous.
three time trump voter here, Matt gaetz is rather clownish, but hardly a horrible pick if we're speaking objectively. Speaking subjectively, he's not gonna bring about or back consensus or 'decency' to the AG office that's been lacking in such since William Barr, and even before then under Obama we had awful ag's too.
You should probably do some actual research then. Calling something slanderous when YOU ADMIT TO NOT KNOWING WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT is fucking pathetic. Idiots like this shouldn’t have a say in how our country is run, your incompetence makes you a danger to those around you.
@@grumpyoldcat8302 to fix your Trump derangement syndrome, maybe go outside and touch some grass, go on a date, it'll be good for you
@ calling people deranged for calling out a fascist and his cronies is more of a confession than anything
@@grumpyoldcat8302Ma'am, settle down. You have one unit from a night school in Mississippi. The fact that I never heard of him has nothing to do with the slanderous tone and verbiage in the reporting.
I would like a new version of The West Wing. What is a good title? and who will be the director?
All the good comments have been relegated to the Newest tab via the algorithm. lol
French's argument about experience falls flat. In living memory we had JFK (43), Clinton (46) and Obama (47) elected leaders of the Free World. RFK Sr. was 35 when he became his brother's AG. Our current AG and DEFSEC are complete disasters, it would be difficult to do worse.
You have to be a special kind of stupid to honestly believe that
Obviously you don't have a clue. But you work for the New York Times. So that's expected.
Fantastic news. But keep crying NYT.
Rfk jr is one of the (very) few bright spots. His assesment of the issues is spot on, and even if he only does half of what he is claiming we will be far better off. There is ZERO reason why we should be literally subsidizing diabetes with food stamps by allowing them to buy soda, for example.
I would add the DOGE office will also be a good thing to rid the gov of much of it's waste.
In what world is an anti-vaxxer in charge of DHHS a BRIGHT SPOT?! You need to get your fucking head checked.
@@jeffreycobb6336only an idiot would think DOGE is a good idea. The “waste” they plan to get rid of is HEALTHCARE FOR VETERANS? If you support Trump or DOGE then you hate the troops
Kansas City says “Hello!”
Great departure from MSM bias. Differing opinions stated clearly for the listener to parse. Bravo!
They are still too milquetoast on this pod not nearly enough understanding that progressives are literally evil
Gee did they both think Biden and then Kamaltoe was going to win? 😆 “expert” opinions indeed
Ross Thought Trump was going to win.
God knows what will haooen. A very apt slogan for the coming months.
Hey, why not that for the TV version of the White House drama/comedy "God knows what will happen"?
hEY ANOTHER TITLE IS "We voted, ...so Bring it On!"
Lets speculate and call it news. Blah Blah Blah.
If they didn't commit a crime they have nothing to fear. The reason they are afraid is that they know they are guilty.
No, any investigation means that those investigated must hire lawyers and spend a lot of money while living for a long time with threat of prosecution hanging over their heads. I have experience with cases where individuals were wrongfully accused. Even though they were eventually found to be innocent, each case took 3 yrs to resolve and ruined each individuals’ life. Investigations also take up a lot of resources that should be invested into something productive for our country.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Horrid opinions 😂 not convincing at all fellas
Yall are mad annoying
TALK about competence you're side had cackling Kamla!!!
You have got to stop drinking the Trump cult koolaid. In no way is this an apt comparison
@@grumpyoldcat8302 WHO, won the election and the popular Vote again?
@@legion-s7tkeep up the childish deflection lmao. Trump winning doesn’t have anything to do with your constant whataboutism and ad hominem arguments, but you just go right ahead and admit to begin too intellectually stunted to use logic and reason in your thinking.
@@grumpyoldcat8302 Did you see the ELECTION RESULTS? Can a Kamla word salad help you explain them?
Once in office, could the 25th Amendment be invoked, submitting, among other evidence, the egregious behavior of Trump during his campaign and, as of now, his cabinet picks?
No, but what can happen is he does what he said he would do during the campaign. You’ll suffer a great golden age so stfu
Doing so would require the Vice President and members of the Executive Cabinet or Congress to determine the President is unfit to hold office, an unlikely situation given.....
1: Vance is riding high on the MAGA train and wouldn't be so stupid to bite the hand that feeds him.
2: Trump will staff his Cabinet entirely with sycophants and toadies who will show unwavering loyalty to him.
3: There's no chance in hell a Republican-majority Congress would invoke the 25th.
The only way Trump is leaving office before the end of his 2nd term is by death or some incapacitating health crisis; he won't be removed through impeachment or a Republican coup!
It’s literally his cabinet that votes on that, though. Like, even IF you could convince a majority of the public to support this, you would have to also convince the literal yesmen who you’re opposing the appointment of to begin with
@@Ryan-on5on Thank you for your very comprehensive answer. It was edifying. But I will still keep my hopes up. First, I can't help but see a power struggle in Trump's mix of so many volatile egos. For instance, I envision bitterness ahead for Vance, especially with Musk seemingly acting as V.P., or "co-President". Second, already, Trump is getting a lot of Republican opposition against the Gaetz nomination. Third, Thune is a Mitch McConnell mentee; hat thickens the plot. It's all wishful thinking on my part, I know.
Thank you, again.
@@grumpyoldcat8302As opposed to the nomen Dems pick for their cabinet. You are so principled.