Identical Ammunition in Different Guns

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 жов 2020
  • Paul tests identical ammo in different guns.
    Shirts and patches from Tristar Trading Co:
    Other platforms:
    Rumble: rumble.com/c/PaulHarrell
    Odysee: odysee.com/@paul_Harrell
    Paul's Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=5769301
    This video was edited and uploaded by:
    Brad Nelson - minutemantheory.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @Tadicuslegion78
    @Tadicuslegion78 3 роки тому +709

    Me: I should go to bed.
    Paul Harrell: Permission Denied

    • @possiblepilotdeviation5791
      @possiblepilotdeviation5791 3 роки тому +31

      Program Compliance dictates you must watch this video.

    • @christopherhayden3911
      @christopherhayden3911 3 роки тому +5

      Same except there is a hurricane :/

    • @billdont2458
      @billdont2458 3 роки тому +1

      Right! Lol

    •  3 роки тому +4

      Spot on, was getting ready to shut down for the nite, then Paul pops up, dogs can wait for their 11pm MST outside business detail.

    • @rowdybroomstick1216
      @rowdybroomstick1216 3 роки тому

      Same here. Must stay awake

  • @tyrranicalt-rad6164
    @tyrranicalt-rad6164 3 роки тому +749

    Paul actually doesn't use a shooting chronograph. He just hears the shot and knows its exact FPS !!! 🤣

    • @ahuman2695
      @ahuman2695 3 роки тому +18

      A pretty awesome plot twist

    • @ironbomb6753
      @ironbomb6753 3 роки тому +9

      @@ahuman2695 👍🤣😎

    • @FoulPet
      @FoulPet 3 роки тому +29

      I thought he felt the change in air pressure since he constantly tells us he wears eye and ear pro.

    • @chpalmer2007
      @chpalmer2007 3 роки тому +10

      I seriously could believe that. Some people are just that good! :)

    • @416loren
      @416loren 3 роки тому +52

      I agree. We never actually see the results on the chronograph. Paul barks out the numbers and the chronograph is too afraid to say different.

  • @Cod3Thr33
    @Cod3Thr33 3 роки тому +130

    I like how he clearly identifies the question first, then thoroughly answers it.

    • @coldfront7914
      @coldfront7914 3 роки тому +4

      Welcome to the channel haha!

    • @DEATH_TO_TYRANTS
      @DEATH_TO_TYRANTS 3 роки тому +7

      If Paul's nothing else, he's clear and thorough.

    • @robwilkes3351
      @robwilkes3351 3 роки тому +3

      I've seen the same method used in answering questions during presentations in the military. "Your question was XXX", gives answer, "Des that answer your question". It's an effective way to make sure everyone is on the same page.

  • @reginaldscot165
    @reginaldscot165 3 роки тому +314

    Paul's Wife: "why do you need 2 of the same gun Paul, it's getting ridiculous?"
    Paul: *points to this video*

    • @jonrolfson1686
      @jonrolfson1686 3 роки тому +30

      They are like earrings: they must be paired to assure maximum elegance.

    • @blairbuskirk5460
      @blairbuskirk5460 3 роки тому +10

      Well he has a good head start on an old west gunslinger costume for Halloween.

    • @GuyWithAnOpinion2
      @GuyWithAnOpinion2 3 роки тому +19

      Having a consecutive pair of Vaqueros in .45 Colt is a strong indicator that Paul or one of his friends is involved in Cowboy Action Shooting.

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 роки тому +11

      Don't be silly; Paul would never marry a woman who'd say that!

    • @chrisgabbert658
      @chrisgabbert658 3 роки тому +7

      His and hers🤔

  • @GrubbyPaddler
    @GrubbyPaddler 3 роки тому +569

    Is that a beretta 92 self loading semiautomatic pistol loaded with green and white box 115grain round nose in your pocket... or are you just pleased to see me?

    • @colzod1559
      @colzod1559 3 роки тому +56

      No, it's a Beretta M9 loaded with Remington green and white box 124 grain full metal jacket. :)

    • @Wonky-Donkey
      @Wonky-Donkey 3 роки тому +12

      I'm just happy to see you.

    • @Hanzer-ns5bh
      @Hanzer-ns5bh 3 роки тому +13

      "Can't it be both?"

    • @Cautionary_Tale_Harris
      @Cautionary_Tale_Harris 3 роки тому +7

      Right or left pocket?
      Left pocket is a banana.

    • @michaeldoe4805
      @michaeldoe4805 3 роки тому +23

      You be the judge

  • @dessy0523
    @dessy0523 3 роки тому +511

    This might just be one of the most informative channels out there

    • @chemusvandergeek1209
      @chemusvandergeek1209 3 роки тому +21

      This, plus Forgotten Weapons, and Mark Novak's Anvil are some of my favorites.

    • @basedgodstrugglin
      @basedgodstrugglin 3 роки тому +4

      It’s no might, regardless of what the information is

    • @politicallyunreliable4985
      @politicallyunreliable4985 3 роки тому +9

      This and Lucky Gunner have the most informative content. They just don't talk a bunch of crap.

    • @sillysad3198
      @sillysad3198 3 роки тому +5

      and therapeutic too

    • @muhammades20
      @muhammades20 3 роки тому +2

      It’s really is

  • @richiet6381
    @richiet6381 3 роки тому +188

    I swear it never cease to amaze me when you just pulls out weapons out of the blue… I know there’s a Sherman tank somewhere in there…

    • @hotrodray6802
      @hotrodray6802 3 роки тому +4

      He probably is a fan of the Marx brothers.

    • @ravissary79
      @ravissary79 3 роки тому +11

      He has a jacket of holding.

    • @richiet6381
      @richiet6381 3 роки тому +2

      For real!!!! Ya never know!

    • @jonrolfson1686
      @jonrolfson1686 3 роки тому +2

      The ability to accurately select at will all the desired items from any garment’s endlessly capacious pockets was a skill particularly ascribed to Harrell, Tempestuous Óðinn’s wiser, calmer elder brother.

    • @shawnr771
      @shawnr771 3 роки тому +2

      Plasma cannon in the 40 watt range.

  • @HT-ww3zg
    @HT-ww3zg 3 роки тому +332

    Actual conversation:
    Wife: "What are you watching?"
    Me: "UA-cam video about shooting."
    1 minute silence.
    Wife: "He needs a new coat. That one is all frayed and the seam is coming undone in the back. Probably because he sits on it."
    I laughed so hard - I would never have noticed that in a million years. It was the first thing she noticed - she could care less about guns and shooting.

    • @thelz7909
      @thelz7909 3 роки тому +59

      Ah, but little did you know, she was hinting to you that you need to buy her a new coat.

    • @benjaminshropshire2900
      @benjaminshropshire2900 3 роки тому +57

      Same video, same monitor, same time, different people and they see different things. Now *THAT* is a kind of diversity we can all benefit from having around. If everyone noticed and didn't noticed the same things, we would all loose out.

    • @fefohood
      @fefohood 3 роки тому +48

      Nice couple. You shoot, she analyzes the crime scene.

    • @kirkalley3469
      @kirkalley3469 3 роки тому +9

      I am surprised at the fray, people brainwashed from the military would use a lighter to burn them off and then line up for inspection.

    • @darrylhays5804
      @darrylhays5804 3 роки тому +21

      To be fair I noticed it too but when one has a multi dimensional pocket garment like that it can be overlooked.

  • @ludecom-cz1wz
    @ludecom-cz1wz 3 роки тому +424

    I'm sad for all the Meat Targets that did not find a forever home in this episode.

    • @rsbrehm
      @rsbrehm 3 роки тому +8

      I'm hungry.

    • @greggc8088
      @greggc8088 3 роки тому +6

      Would have made a nice stew.

    • @ABrit-bt6ce
      @ABrit-bt6ce 3 роки тому +5

      They have gone to live on a farm in Manchester.

    • @bobcat9501
      @bobcat9501 3 роки тому +1

      Well now he’s gonna have to go back and make a new video!!!

    • @georgec8859
      @georgec8859 3 роки тому +3

      the meat targets are recovered, made safe to eat and sent to a wolf sanctuary.

  • @mmclaurin8035
    @mmclaurin8035 3 роки тому +321

    There might be a hurricane outside, but as long as I have power and Paul Harrell, I'm gonna be fine.

    • @stevencooper4422
      @stevencooper4422 3 роки тому +14

      Godspeed. Shame it hit the same place twice

    • @A-Negative
      @A-Negative 3 роки тому +15

      Stay safe and apologies but you’ll have to put up with a hurricane in the background

    • @Jeremy-sf2xf
      @Jeremy-sf2xf 3 роки тому +7

      Hate to hear that for y'all. My area got rocked by Sally. She was a bitch of one and they got what she would do totally wrong. I live in Baldwin county so she went right over the top of us. Thankfully I only lost part of a shed and a lot of trees. Had power out for about a week. So we did lose all our food in the freezer and fridge.
      Hope you make it out ok.

    • @casualobserver3145
      @casualobserver3145 3 роки тому +5

      Same here. The wind is howling & the sky is angry in Baton Rouge but I’m safe & happy watching Paul Harrell videos.

    • @dutchmccutch615
      @dutchmccutch615 3 роки тому +3

      God speed sir! I hope yall make it through it unscathed! Haha Paul is awesome!

  • @rogerjewell6753
    @rogerjewell6753 3 роки тому +133

    Who else was waiting to see if he pulled that other .22 rifle out of his coat pocket?

    • @JamesThomas-gg6il
      @JamesThomas-gg6il 3 роки тому +2

      He did, just didnt get it on camera

    • @kirkalley3469
      @kirkalley3469 3 роки тому +1

      When he pulled out and held up the two nylon 66 mccandless moose poacher guns, i could see the muzzles were perfectly horizontal with eachother.

  • @wheneggsdrop1701
    @wheneggsdrop1701 3 роки тому +215

    It's an even better day when paul harrell uploads.

    • @2realink279
      @2realink279 3 роки тому

      Fr!

    • @charleshills8540
      @charleshills8540 3 роки тому +1

      All without taking his eye off the target.

    • @darthkek1953
      @darthkek1953 3 роки тому

      It's an even even better day when he unloads... downrange.

    • @stonercat1232
      @stonercat1232 3 роки тому

      Yeah I fucking love this channel I’d love to meet him irl lol

  • @iboopedyournose
    @iboopedyournose 3 роки тому +58

    I think after watching all of Paul’s videos to date, I’ve been conditioned to automatically be happy when hearing the intro theme.
    Thanks for the great content as always!

  • @louisbecker5941
    @louisbecker5941 3 роки тому +201

    The double-barreled shotgun results were similar to a politician speaking out of each side of his or her mouth.

    • @davidunderwood3605
      @davidunderwood3605 3 роки тому +15

      Now that smacks of alot of truth.

    • @michaelblacktree
      @michaelblacktree 3 роки тому +13

      Are you implying the shotgun was full of crap? 😛

    • @louisbecker5941
      @louisbecker5941 3 роки тому +39

      @@michaelblacktree
      Maybe I'm implying that Nancy should have a 'full choke' installed...🤣

    • @michaelblacktree
      @michaelblacktree 3 роки тому +3

      hehe

    • @aroostook88
      @aroostook88 3 роки тому +2

      In doing that test, Paul made sure his home was safe. Joe Biden said that would work.

  • @turbot8er672
    @turbot8er672 3 роки тому +24

    I think there's more difference between two "identical rounds" than there is between two "identical firearms."

  • @jaqcp
    @jaqcp 3 роки тому +286

    Aaaaand he never looked at the gun or speedloader when reloading. Caleb can't do that.

    • @davidunderwood3605
      @davidunderwood3605 3 роки тому +8

      He's practicing what he teaches, and what better way than on video to show us.

    • @per_petual1453
      @per_petual1453 3 роки тому +9

      @@alisterbh gun nuts media, see paul's "rebuttal" video

    • @gladbag2005
      @gladbag2005 3 роки тому +5

      the chronograph started ptsd therapy from the constant mean mugging

    • @guysevedz3581
      @guysevedz3581 3 роки тому +10

      Who is Caleb?

    • @Cautionary_Tale_Harris
      @Cautionary_Tale_Harris 3 роки тому +6

      Haha, I remember that dude.
      One of the smallest men I've ever seen.

  • @edwardgreenaway1808
    @edwardgreenaway1808 3 роки тому +49

    What a nice bit of land to play in.

    • @johnmat4678
      @johnmat4678 3 роки тому +8

      Pretty soon a communist country.

    • @gregb6469
      @gregb6469 3 роки тому +4

      @Pavel Manzhetov -- There is a serious effort to have the southern and western counties of Oregon become part of Idaho.

    • @bryanhawk6052
      @bryanhawk6052 3 роки тому +3

      Looks like Missouri to me

  • @jaxyt94
    @jaxyt94 3 роки тому +33

    Great content Paul. This is the best informative gun channel on UA-cam.

  • @fallenpastabean804
    @fallenpastabean804 3 роки тому +72

    Paul, paul, paul.. You've been in the game long enough. You've also established a reputation for being one of the only gun guys (if not the only) who knows how to create a detailed, educated, non-biased video for either reviewing or comparing two or more variables (guns, ammunition, and the like). Now, why haven't we seen an in-depth .45 acp vs 9mm comparo? I'm sure everyone would love to see a Paul Harrel approach on this topic i.e. educated, non-biased, and most importantly, non-toxic way of creating content about the comparison! :)
    Give this a thumbs up if you agree so Paul can see this comment and hopefully consider it!

    • @johnnybeanz1296
      @johnnybeanz1296 3 роки тому +1

      Fallen Pastabean almost $1.00 per round for 45acp these days. Just a thought.

    • @elgringosupremo
      @elgringosupremo 3 роки тому +10

      He has said before that he has no interest in making videos on things that have been done to death by others. I agree with him on this.
      I really don’t know what revelations you could expect to get from one more comparison. 45 has more recoil, makes bigger holes, and the guns generally have lower capacity. 9 has less recoil, makes smaller holes, and the guns generally have higher capacity. There’s your comparison. Anything beyond that is something you could infer from that info, or anecdotal.

    • @kirkalley3469
      @kirkalley3469 3 роки тому

      True he seems fair in his testing. After all he could use a tough steak for the meat target when shooting federal ammo then switch to a pile of raw hamberger when testing green and white box🤔

    • @KarltheKrazyone
      @KarltheKrazyone 3 роки тому +3

      InRange has done some good stuff over the years using spinner targets as a combined test of impact and recoil disruption. The reality is that you get a big chart of advantages for anything, but everyone is going to score those out differently, so there is no one answer.

    • @fallenpastabean804
      @fallenpastabean804 3 роки тому +5

      @@elgringosupremo I suppose you have a valid point. However, would I be wrong for simply wanting a perspective from Paul Harrel because of his interesting style of presentations and entertaining "part where he talks a lot"? You be the judge.

  • @thecheapshot1065
    @thecheapshot1065 3 роки тому +21

    Scientist finally confirmed the universe could begin with a big bang turns out it was Paul learning how to shoot for the first time

  • @buddha8204
    @buddha8204 3 роки тому +16

    Fun Fact: The double-barreled shotgun velocities are the combination to Paul's enormous gun safe.

  • @digitalgods5568
    @digitalgods5568 3 роки тому +126

    Paul Harrell: "And the gun I'm using is stamped on the barrel...Marteen Amanetti FUBAR Spain. I'm probably pronouncing that wrong."

  • @herbertgearing1702
    @herbertgearing1702 3 роки тому +16

    "Fubar Spain" "I'm probably pronouncing that wrong"

  • @nesquick84
    @nesquick84 3 роки тому +18

    I wish I could have Paul Harrell as my professor for all my classes. He manages to convey useful information in the most interesting manner possible.

    • @shawnr771
      @shawnr771 3 роки тому +3

      Every professor and instructor needs to take lessons.

  • @giddy6196
    @giddy6196 3 роки тому +30

    Dam, i want a training facility!

  • @LawrencePilgrim
    @LawrencePilgrim 3 роки тому +35

    Great video, I can't wait to see the halloween special for this year. If its not too late, I remember you mentioning reading books about criminal profiling and statistics. I think that would make a great video. Anyway, thanks for this video!

    • @mattali4163
      @mattali4163 3 роки тому +5

      I never thought about it, but that would make a great presentation!

    • @gmpalmgren
      @gmpalmgren 3 роки тому +1

      Always interesting. The last video I watched was Paul cleaning guns. I rank that one a little higher. Why? Because Paul talked more. I did not get my fill of Shatner-like pauses this week.

  • @2dAnglicoSix
    @2dAnglicoSix 3 роки тому +34

    Fine firearms all! However, I really admire your pair of Remington Nylon 66’s. The Nylon ‘66 brings back great memories. It was truly a rifle way ahead of its time. My only bittersweet memory involving my personal Nylon ‘66 was in trading mine away years ago while a young Marine for partial payment toward a first generation Colt AR rifle. ‘Semper Fi’. Joseph S.,100% Combat-related Disabled Veteran.

    • @2dAnglicoSix
      @2dAnglicoSix 3 роки тому +6

      Matt Schmitt ... You’re welcome! Obviously, I didn’t pay the greatest price because I am still alive. However, I was virtually bed-ridden for nearly a decade. The God of Scripture along with Messiah Yeshua (Jesus) of Nazareth ultimately healed me and I am now able to enjoy life once again. The decade lost will remain lost. One of the reasons that I support DJT (as compared to the alternatives) is that he has promised to bring the US troops home from Afghanistan by the end-of-the-year. FYI, the war in Afghanistan is NOW our Nation’s longest war! With Osama bin Laden dead, we accomplished the principle purpose in our initial involvement. The lives and limbs lost by our service-members remain a permanent scar. Even if we stayed there 27 years (instead of 17) when we leave... Afghanistan will remain Afghanistan. It has NO impact to the direct security of our Nation, infrastructure, or our people. Politicians from BOTH parties have been complicit! Defend the homeland is DOD’s constitutional charter. Best Regards, Joseph S.

    • @chrisgabbert658
      @chrisgabbert658 3 роки тому

      I traded my for a Browning Momad.

    • @clintonr9804
      @clintonr9804 3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for your service, and all you have given for everyone, here and abroad.
      My first was a green Nylon 66 given to me by my dad when he first taught me how to shoot in the '60's. It was stolen from the family farm by a renter we took pity on. Twenty years later, I purchased my own brown 66, which I used to teach my daughter and son to shoot not long ago. It will not be going anywhere.
      Years after my dad died, my mother decided "it wouldn't be safe" for me to keep firearms as I had children in the house. She gave away his Snub-nosed 38 Police Special, a 22 auto, and other weapons I had been promised. My kids were more knowledgeable and trustworthy around firearms than she ever was!

    • @2dAnglicoSix
      @2dAnglicoSix 3 роки тому +1

      Clinton R , Thank-you for those kind words! It really means more to me than words can ever express. The Department of Defense (DOD) serves little real purpose were it not for a citizenry that is truly worth protecting, such as yourself! Finally, may you continue to be blessed by the wisdom you have shown in teaching your children respect for tools that can either save lives or take lives. In doing so, you have supported our God-given 2A rights, shown them an enjoyable potential future hobby, and removed the mysticism surrounding forbidden objects. Best regards, Joseph S.

    • @fls360
      @fls360 3 роки тому

      I still have a 66 tucked away from 1971........somewhere.

  • @nunya3163
    @nunya3163 3 роки тому +20

    Would love to see this done with Glocks and 1911's.

  • @alvaryoru5441
    @alvaryoru5441 3 роки тому +13

    Not gonna lie, seeing those Vaqueros being unholstered made me smile for no real reason other than aesthetics.

  • @bynumite76
    @bynumite76 3 роки тому +35

    I just love the little supersonic crack of the .22. Yeah I'm a geek.

    • @michaelblacktree
      @michaelblacktree 3 роки тому +3

      Same here. It's pretty satisfying.

    • @borkwoof696
      @borkwoof696 3 роки тому

      What a geek you are

    • @shawnr771
      @shawnr771 3 роки тому

      Got to hear that just the day about a hundred times.
      Very satisfying.

    • @kevinwarnock3106
      @kevinwarnock3106 3 роки тому +1

      I spent my teenage years hunting ground squirrels in Northeast Oregon, a couple friends, each with a couple 500 round boxes of .22 ammo and a lot of open ground. Great way to spend a Saturday.

  • @darthkek1953
    @darthkek1953 3 роки тому +9

    That range has what we call in the UK "the zombie apocalypse bus."
    People in the US think of them as school buses, but we mainly see them with spikes on in zombie movies & games.

    • @darthkek1953
      @darthkek1953 Рік тому +1

      @@kennydoggins1712 Depends where you are in the country. Where I am at the moment they are lone single-deck smaller coaches due to small population. Where I grew up, a large rural catchment area, they ran a fleet of more than a dozen double-deckers.

  • @kevinsmith3901
    @kevinsmith3901 3 роки тому +10

    All I can say is: Thank you sir.
    Thanks for taking the time to educate me.
    Thank you for your service, and thanks for continuing to serve.
    I think its the other way around...Bill Shatner has Harrellesque pauses.
    Keep up the great work.
    -- the smitz

  • @altruisticscoundrel
    @altruisticscoundrel 3 роки тому +37

    I know you like costumes. What about a poncho, wow brimmed sombrero, and a thick black mustache when you shoot the vaqueroes at the same time?

    • @hotrodray6802
      @hotrodray6802 3 роки тому +4

      Wish Id thought of this comment.👍

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 роки тому +3

      Next you'll want him to impersonate Speedy Gonzales...

    • @jddrafts
      @jddrafts 3 роки тому +4

      Mark H. Slowpoke Rodriguez.

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 роки тому +1

      @@jddrafts :)

    • @mwnciboo
      @mwnciboo 3 роки тому

      Not 1970's enough...

  • @jesteravrgjoe2888
    @jesteravrgjoe2888 3 роки тому +62

    The answer is in the difference in metallurgy.
    Tool steel creates more drag on the projectile than stainless. The chrome mixture in stainless makes for a slicker barrel when compared to the high carbon tool steel.
    Another variable is tool fatigue.
    Hammer forged barrels are made on a mandrel. At the end of the life of the mandrel. The rifling, and barrel can be less desirable. A more accurate barrel is made at the beginning of the life of the mandrel. The better definition of rifling allows for the shooter to break in the rifle barrel into a sweet spot where the rifling, and round meet perfectly for better accuracy, or in the case of precision shooting. Where the barrel, and ammunition allows for consistent pressures leading to consistent accuracy.

    • @ostiariusalpha
      @ostiariusalpha 3 роки тому +10

      There are also slight differences in bore tightness between manufacturers and even individual firearms.

    • @jesteravrgjoe2888
      @jesteravrgjoe2888 3 роки тому +3

      ostiariusalpha
      I added more information to my comment that addresses tool fatigue the leads to less desirable barrels, and rifling.

    • @richardburnett-_
      @richardburnett-_ 3 роки тому +2

      Need a stainless vs carbon steel barrels comparison video.

    • @davidunderwood3605
      @davidunderwood3605 3 роки тому +2

      @@richardburnett-_ also melonite vs. blued vs. stainless. I have melonited barrel thats so slick that slugging it is incredibly easy.

    • @bman_-ze4gu
      @bman_-ze4gu 3 роки тому

      Much respect for all the knowledge you have I really enjoy mechanical things and I got that passion with firearms unfortunately I was 8 at the time and couldn't interact with them I got into motorcycles and cars instead and am pretty knowledgeable at 19 I hope I can get nearly as knowledgeable about firearms as I am about cars and motorcycles.

  • @john-paulsilke893
    @john-paulsilke893 3 роки тому +14

    So distracted by the intro. Paul isn’t being attacked by the weather; either rain or snow.

  • @Cautionary_Tale_Harris
    @Cautionary_Tale_Harris 3 роки тому +4

    Paul needs all the space inside the school bus when he empties the guns and ammo from his coat pockets.

  • @garyK.45ACP
    @garyK.45ACP 3 роки тому +6

    2:29 Before you fire a shot...
    The answer, in my experience is "Yes, but..."
    In my collection I have 3 S&W J frame revolvers, all with 1-7/8" barrel, a Model 40, a Model 640 and a Model 642.
    I also had (now passed on to two sons) two identical Ruger Model 77 RSI rifles in .243 both with 18.5" barrels and I have two Kimber Ultra .45s an Ultra Carry II and an Ultra CDP II, both with 3" barrels. I have 2 identical Colt Officer's Model Match Revolvers both with 6" barrels. I also have 4 .357 revolvers with 4" barrels but they are different makes or models. I have several O/U shotguns but have never tried the chrono test with them, or, for that matter any of my other shotguns.
    In ALL of them, identical ammunition fired over my PACT Model 1 Chronograph result in different velocity averages...and in the case of the Ruger rifles, one of them shoots consistently "faster" with any load I have tried through them.
    BUT...the velocity averages, while different, almost always fall within the "extreme spread" of the two guns. Meaning that individual shots from the same gun can, and do, result in variances as great, or greater, than the average difference between two different guns.
    So...YES, but the difference is negligible, IMO.
    Back to the video...your J frames had an average velocity difference of 46 fps but extreme spreads of 96 and 84 fps respectively. Your tests with the other guns confirmed that. So your results were consistent with what I have found.
    Different...BUT negligible.

  • @thecheapshot1065
    @thecheapshot1065 3 роки тому +16

    Paul Harrel never actually has to pull the trigger of a gun. He just looked at the bullets and quietly says”RUN!”

    • @jonrolfson1686
      @jonrolfson1686 3 роки тому +3

      Well - There goes the 'variability in velocity is somewhat related to the strength of the trigger-squeeze' hypothesis.

  • @williamboulanger3639
    @williamboulanger3639 3 роки тому +7

    Once again Paul brings us to school - " HEY " he even brought the bus ! The dislikes must be from the ones that didn't see the right length bus for them and FEEL left out .

  • @Arkancide
    @Arkancide 3 роки тому +4

    Ah, Nylon 66. First gun I ever fired, given to me by my father, and still hangs up in my bedroom. Such a nostalgic report too.

    • @keirantalent
      @keirantalent 3 роки тому

      When you see the guns they used to make with quality and compare that to the company now it’s heartbreaking...

  • @seanridner1385
    @seanridner1385 3 роки тому +7

    Been wondering about this video idea for a while now. Great timing Paul!

  • @the_chomper
    @the_chomper 3 роки тому +139

    posted 4 minutes ago and its 17 minutes long and already a down vote... well we know who it is at least and hes prolly trying to look cool with a revolver.

    • @residentevil4freek
      @residentevil4freek 3 роки тому +35

      Give him a break, it's Friday, he's probably 8 whiskeys in by now

    • @ScottKenny1978
      @ScottKenny1978 3 роки тому +8

      @@residentevil4freek what do you mean, 8?
      I've seen him drink, and that's way low.

    • @johnsmith-sp6yl
      @johnsmith-sp6yl 3 роки тому +15

      he's jealous of the rosewood grips and the sequential serial numbers.

    • @jeffhightower8085
      @jeffhightower8085 3 роки тому +5

      Caleb naughty naughty

    • @residentevil4freek
      @residentevil4freek 3 роки тому +6

      @@ScottKenny1978 8 pints

  • @BELCAN57
    @BELCAN57 3 роки тому +7

    I was hoping to hear that Remington's ammunition division had been purchased by Paul Harrell. Oh well....

  • @nosoapradio1665
    @nosoapradio1665 3 роки тому +4

    I just finished watching several videos back to back, just to find one more new upload "15 minutes ago".
    Thank you, sir!

  • @jackstrouse4833
    @jackstrouse4833 3 роки тому +71

    So happy there's someone who likes investigating banal (yet interesting) topics like this.

    • @sanguinemoon9201
      @sanguinemoon9201 3 роки тому +5

      Don't mind those that do not speak/read English (American or other), complaining. The ability to communicate effectively through language and opposable thumbs are all that separate us from the poo-flingers.

  • @swampwhiteoak1
    @swampwhiteoak1 3 роки тому +6

    Thank you for another fascinating video exploring a topic of keen interest to us “gun minded” individuals.
    Paul and his friends have a fantastic collection of firearms.

  • @monogamousbonobo3923
    @monogamousbonobo3923 3 роки тому

    Another informative video Paul! Thanks for all you do, a great way to get start my day!

  • @556nutt
    @556nutt 3 роки тому +3

    This man never looked down for any of his reloads. :) Thats someone who has done this a time or two. Keep up the great work paul

  • @killervztwogaming5796
    @killervztwogaming5796 3 роки тому +6

    FUBAR Spain is such a beautiful place this time of year.

  • @kentuckybackwoods7114
    @kentuckybackwoods7114 3 роки тому +5

    I've had firearms of the same model and configuration shoot completely differently. This especially true when pattering shotguns for turkeys with different ammo and choke tubes. I've also noticed a difference in older firearms vs newer ones of the same model caliber/gauge. Of course this is affected by barrel life and manufacturing processes over the years. It would not surprise me if two firearms directly off the assembly line with one different digit in serial number would shoot differently to some minor degree. This goes back to the age old rule of knowing your shooting habits and knowing your firearms "pull." Surprisingly, I do have a colt snubby and s&w snubby that do practically shoot identically at least in my hands. Go figure.

  • @pinbana230
    @pinbana230 3 роки тому +2

    Hey Paul! Just wanted to say hi and thanks for all the work you've put in to this channel and community throughout all these years. Hope to see you into the future.

  • @808maxstone
    @808maxstone 3 роки тому

    Very interesting results. Thanks for the video Paul

  • @buckberthod5007
    @buckberthod5007 3 роки тому +9

    That man pulled a magician trick at 3:02

  • @jessehayes486
    @jessehayes486 3 роки тому +4

    Just when you thought there are no more questions or mysteries in the universe that Paul can't answer for us...thanks again Paul!

  • @diceblue6817
    @diceblue6817 3 роки тому

    Awesome video with some great insights! Very interesting to see these differences

  • @marley4142
    @marley4142 3 роки тому +1

    Your patient, analytical and professional, you deserve more subscribers.

  • @michaelholland2915
    @michaelholland2915 3 роки тому +8

    You make pockets look good, Sir.

  • @michaeltellurian825
    @michaeltellurian825 3 роки тому +12

    Field trips have gotten more sophisticated since I was a kid.

    • @Cautionary_Tale_Harris
      @Cautionary_Tale_Harris 3 роки тому +2

      Paul needs the space inside the school bus when he empties the guns and ammo from his coat pockets.

  • @rickm4295
    @rickm4295 3 роки тому +2

    Paul put his old jacket on for this one....he means business today

  • @richarddavis1884
    @richarddavis1884 3 роки тому

    Good information as always. Thanks Paul!

  • @kings-bay-2902
    @kings-bay-2902 3 роки тому +3

    What we learn from this man is priceless.

  • @jamescarnevale3312
    @jamescarnevale3312 3 роки тому +11

    BZ. The only thing missing is the data tabulation on the cardboard easel.

  • @jimbojimbo8
    @jimbojimbo8 3 роки тому

    Another great and informational video from Paul thank you my friend I appreciate the effort you put into teaching

  • @tonyv8925
    @tonyv8925 3 роки тому

    That was a great video. I just enjoyed you shooting various models and calibers. Thank you for this presentation.

  • @archimagirus_sancti
    @archimagirus_sancti 3 роки тому +78

    "It's not enough difference to make a difference." Paul Harrell quote of 2020 to save us from violent political chaos. Don't let this year's madness rip us apart. War is hell

    • @leadbellywolf578
      @leadbellywolf578 3 роки тому +5

      Amen brother

    • @archimagirus_sancti
      @archimagirus_sancti 3 роки тому +2

      Almighty God, save us from chaos. Mother Mary and all Saints, pray for us

    • @commanderbeepo8066
      @commanderbeepo8066 3 роки тому +11

      The emperor protects, but a loaded bolter doesn't hurt

    • @archimagirus_sancti
      @archimagirus_sancti 3 роки тому +2

      @@commanderbeepo8066 My 92FS gives me enough warm fuzzies to sleep at night

    • @MRCOLOURfilld
      @MRCOLOURfilld 3 роки тому +1

      Ah horseshoe theory at its worst.

  • @chrish.4067
    @chrish.4067 3 роки тому +8

    Paul's field jacket is older than some of his commentors.

  • @NomadicHacker.
    @NomadicHacker. 2 роки тому

    Very informative. Thanks for putting the time in to make this video

  • @flightparamedic505
    @flightparamedic505 Рік тому +1

    Great video. Thanks Paul !

  • @yankeegmail
    @yankeegmail 3 роки тому +3

    This reminds me of a table in a previous edition of the Speer reloading manual--I think it had a drawing of an antelope skull on the cover--that had a table of about 20 different handguns of the same caliber (brought in by employees) and the velocity obtained with identical loads. There was surprising variation.

  • @drklop
    @drklop 3 роки тому +8

    Did Model 36 have significantly more rounds fired through it than Model 638 over its lifetime? I wonder if barrel wear was the key factor that caused the difference.

  • @alniles3183
    @alniles3183 3 роки тому +1

    as always, an excellent, well thought out and presented video

  • @hobbyhermit66
    @hobbyhermit66 3 роки тому

    Interesting. Thanks for testing and upload.

  • @almostontimehero5415
    @almostontimehero5415 3 роки тому +41

    "The longer the barrel, the better performance you get." - Paul Harrel
    Case closed, Paul has put the eternal question to rest!

    • @slick3129
      @slick3129 3 роки тому

      @rogerwilco99 I believe it was Guns and Ammo years ago that pointed out 9MM started losing velocity in barrels of 16" or longer.
      That was standard velocity ammo; I might expect that +P would do better since both 357Mag and 44Mag both posted significant increases at that barrel length.

    • @BandAid350z
      @BandAid350z 3 роки тому

      More performance, sure; is there really a debate on that? The cost is weight and maneuverability. A Beretta 92 with a 10” barrel will see higher velocities. Do you want to CC a 10” pistol?

    • @michaelshapiro1543
      @michaelshapiro1543 3 роки тому +1

      "Up to a point," he wisely added. (To make a long story short.)

    • @michaelshapiro1543
      @michaelshapiro1543 3 роки тому +1

      @rogerwilco99 : And he did specify, "velocity". (Not 'performance'.)

    • @BallisticGrandpa
      @BallisticGrandpa 3 роки тому +1

      Sometimes caliber is more important than barrel length, but it's best to have plenty of both.😉

  • @sawyernorthrop4078
    @sawyernorthrop4078 3 роки тому +45

    Given that the firearms tested are revolvers, is it possible that differences in the amount of cylinder gap provided varying pressures from the same ammunition, giving different velocities?

    • @jorgesolis9468
      @jorgesolis9468 3 роки тому +5

      Forcing cone as well could be applied also I believe

    • @ravissary79
      @ravissary79 3 роки тому +4

      Yup and these vary from sample to sample even in identical models.

    • @jorgesolis9468
      @jorgesolis9468 3 роки тому +1

      @@ravissary79 what about barrel material

    • @ravissary79
      @ravissary79 3 роки тому +4

      @@jorgesolis9468 pretty much any difference can cause a variance in velocity.

    • @ravissary79
      @ravissary79 3 роки тому +6

      @@jorgesolis9468 but to be fair, Paul's example of this (his two nearly identical guns ie: same model) had the least variance.

  • @uglygunguy4810
    @uglygunguy4810 3 роки тому

    That was an awesome presentation. It was informative and interesting--as always.

  • @Korellix125
    @Korellix125 3 роки тому

    After watching a lot of your videos and hearing you discuss this topic a lot it took me a while to watch this. Such small differences can come from a multitude of different things. As always though, we can rely on you to put it to the test.

  • @Leonardokite
    @Leonardokite 3 роки тому +4

    For the revolvers I'd be interested to know the gap between the cylinder and barrel on the respective guns. You could use an automotive feeler gauge.

    • @bagertja
      @bagertja 3 роки тому +1

      My thoughts exactly.

  • @charleshetrick3152
    @charleshetrick3152 3 роки тому +15

    “So I says to Mabel, I says-“

  • @charleshanna2089
    @charleshanna2089 3 роки тому

    Great Video as always Paul
    Thank you for everthing that you do

  • @carlpeters1278
    @carlpeters1278 3 роки тому

    Awesome insight. Thanks Paul.

  • @buckberthod5007
    @buckberthod5007 3 роки тому +36

    My theory is tolerances in the gun, if one gun has a better gas seal then the other it could build more pressure to propel the round at a higher velocity and variances in the rounds themselves due to primer burn and power burn. But as always, you be the judge.

    • @thomaswashburn3513
      @thomaswashburn3513 3 роки тому +4

      I totally agree. If one firearm is shot a lot more than another, it will effect the tightness of the bullet in the barrel as well. A tighter barrel fit may sound like more friction, but more friction is better than some gas escaping around a bullet (too loose for the barrel). I have a Winchester 1873 made in 1888 that always keyholes. My guess is the barrel is way out of tolerance, thus allowing a lot of the gases to escape before the round is out of the barrel. But, it’s still fun to shot something made almost a century and a half ago.

    • @brazoon1
      @brazoon1 3 роки тому +3

      Conversely, if the seal was a little too tight it could cause extra friction which would slow down the bullet.

    • @thomaswashburn3513
      @thomaswashburn3513 3 роки тому

      brazoon1 I have been told to “shoot in” a firearm with a few hundred rounds as soon as I get it. There opinion was: There is a sweet spot.

    • @hotrodray6802
      @hotrodray6802 3 роки тому

      Ive seen variations in 45 acp.

  • @jerkygutts8386
    @jerkygutts8386 3 роки тому +9

    “I’m probably pronouncing that wrong.” 🤣😂 “Fubar”Spain must be shotgun headquarters over there

    • @jonrolfson1686
      @jonrolfson1686 3 роки тому

      'Fubar Spain' was a malign side-effect of GCA 68.

  • @fetidcreeper
    @fetidcreeper Рік тому +1

    Having sequential vicaros is pretty cool. The only thing he was missing was the outfit, possibly a hat and blanket poncho

  • @joehalligan7497
    @joehalligan7497 3 роки тому

    Still one of my favorite channels!
    Thanks for your work Mr. Harrell!

  • @joebob4609
    @joebob4609 3 роки тому +11

    I will try this at home.
    No I wouldn’t Paul said NO.

  • @af7119
    @af7119 3 роки тому +47

    This guy can't be any good. I don't see a giant beard, a trucker hat, tattoo sleeves, or roid rage. ;)

    • @chrish.4067
      @chrish.4067 3 роки тому +9

      A trucker hat on backwards.

    • @garyh.7282
      @garyh.7282 3 роки тому +10

      Forgot shaved and polished head , wife beater tshirt

    • @chrish.4067
      @chrish.4067 3 роки тому +11

      And "don't tread on me" or similar slogan t-shirt.

    • @MrCh1cken
      @MrCh1cken 3 роки тому +8

      Or a Channel Title with "Active", "Tactical" or some variant of of "Shoot" in it.

    • @TractorWrangler01
      @TractorWrangler01 3 роки тому +5

      You want to see something funny? Watch the guys with the beards put one of those little Beretta Cheetahs 380s back together by racking it 50 times untill it will allow them to close the slide release. It's good for a quick laugh. I should make a video for them but it's just too funny to mess up.

  • @michaelpage4199
    @michaelpage4199 3 роки тому

    That was a great video. Interesting results. Thanks

  • @OGSontar
    @OGSontar 3 роки тому

    So, I watched this video when it came out in October of 2020, and it popped up in my feed again in April of 2021. Paul has me so well conditioned, that even though I remembered it, I still clicked on it and watched it to the end. Thanks, Paul! It appears your training of us is highly successful. Your video shows up, we click and watch. Where that video is in the list of your videos makes no significant difference at all.

  • @JaggedEmpire1
    @JaggedEmpire1 3 роки тому +3

    With all the trashy crap on UA-cam and all over the news right now, I need some calming, relaxing educational content. So here I am.

  • @apathy2673
    @apathy2673 3 роки тому +15

    I got a lot of "you're an idiot" looks when I would ask this.

    • @Xictlii
      @Xictlii 3 роки тому +12

      some very concerned citizens questioned my governor if coronavirus only targetted the LGBTQ, so I doubt that this question is that "dumb".

    • @maxlutz3674
      @maxlutz3674 3 роки тому +6

      Many people do not think that far. When you question things that are taken for granted, the fault is assumed to be with you. That applies to advertised velocities too. The question is legit even if there was no difference.
      On a similiar topic I know some shooters who got an answer to the question "Does temperature affect velocities?". It was fairly inconvenient as it was at a competion on a cold day and the answer was "Yes. And you are disqualified because the velocity of your rounds is too low.". Though luck as they chronographed their ammo on a nice warm day.

  • @squirrelwesson3969
    @squirrelwesson3969 3 роки тому +1

    Paul's videos are always worth the watch if you actually care about interesting facts and questions he's trying to bring clarity to. I can see this having a follow up video breaking down and explaining WHY there can be a difference between different firearms from different manufacturers that are similar in spec but achieving different velocities. In the case of revolvers, I suspect it has a lot to do with the cylinder gap and cylinder length possibly.

  • @rvail136
    @rvail136 3 роки тому

    Paul, very informative as always. You're the go to guy for...complete information on pretty much anything related to firearms. You are very exacting with your facts and figures. That I appreciate very much.

  • @jeffallan3140
    @jeffallan3140 3 роки тому +11

    Only 3 minutes old and still 352 viewers before me....damn LOL

  • @billystink4611
    @billystink4611 3 роки тому +8

    They say to “slug your bore” when hand loading for a new firearm to properly measure the exact bore diameter. Maybe the slight differences in bore diameters are causing the different results? I don’t know, just a thought. I’m new to hand loading and not any kind of expert.

    • @yfelwulf
      @yfelwulf 3 роки тому +3

      Good if your casting your own bullets and want a perfect fit. If you want to measure exact chamber size. There is a quick melt metal you can use to cast your chamber. www.rotometals.com/chamber-casting-alloy-ingot-aka-low-158-190f/

    • @PS-rr2jt
      @PS-rr2jt 3 роки тому +1

      I slugged my m44 to determine which bullet diameter to use. I can’t use the .308, have to use .311 or .312. My barrel averaged .3115.

    • @gundude82
      @gundude82 3 роки тому +1

      @@PS-rr2jt What kind of accuracy are you getting? I love my mosins, but never considered them very accurate rifles.

    • @PS-rr2jt
      @PS-rr2jt 3 роки тому +1

      2.5 moa with my reloads, so not terrible, but not great either. I’m still playing with load development. Right now I’m working with Hornady #3131 and Sierra #2315 174gr bullets. It took several attempts at cleaning the bore when I first got the rifle to get all the copper out of it. If nothing else, it’s just fun to go out and shoot the thing.

    • @OhioCruffler
      @OhioCruffler 3 роки тому +1

      Yes, bore diameter can make a big difference in velocities.

  • @robmandoline2711
    @robmandoline2711 3 роки тому

    I just wanted to thank you for all the great info over the years Sir

  • @dualsportbandit
    @dualsportbandit 3 роки тому

    keep up the hard work PH..i've enjoyed your content immensely!

  • @retailwarrior1502
    @retailwarrior1502 3 роки тому +3

    When you use multiple projectile shells with the chronograph, how does it take its measurements? Does it read the first projectile, the last projectile, the fastest, the slowest, the wad because its biggest? Maybe it takes an average of all the projectiles.

    • @PaulHarrell
      @PaulHarrell  3 роки тому +4

      At the close distance that I am shooting, the shot column is sill together enough to be measured as one projectile. At longer ranges we get more readings of "error" and more damage to the chrono

  • @evin98
    @evin98 3 роки тому +62

    Ha. Paul still has the bus I sold him at the Rainbow Gathering.

    • @nikodempaszkiewicz8211
      @nikodempaszkiewicz8211 3 роки тому +3

      I was wondering why there's a bus chilling in the back. Oh the memories.

  • @krihanek117
    @krihanek117 3 роки тому

    Always good stuff, thanks Paul,